VIDEO: Persian Comic on ‘Accountability’ thumbnail

VIDEO: Persian Comic on ‘Accountability’

By Vlad Tepes Blog

It is good to see that for the moment, at least somewhere in the United Kingdom you can say something true if it’s stated as a joke.

On the other hand, this wasn’t done that recently.

WATCH: Women Hate Accoutability — Nicholas De Santo



EDITORS NOTE: This Vlad Tepes Blog column and video posted by is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

The post VIDEO: Persian Comic on ‘Accountability’ appeared first on Dr. Rich Swier.

Islam: America’s Historical Failure thumbnail

Islam: America’s Historical Failure

By Amil Imani

Honestly, I don’t know what will work! Apathy, political correctness, and massive Islamic lobbying have successfully prevented the public from truly grasping the all-pervasive, invasive Islamic assault.

As usual, the sworn enemies of the United States- leftist politicians, hungry for votes- despise America and harbor hatred for our Constitution. They delightfully embraced and welcomed this ‘Trojan Horse’ army inside our gates. It was a perfect marriage; both sides needed one another to survive.

These desert dwellers and the Quran-trained people, aided by our leftist politicians, exploit the provisions of the most benevolent system known to humanity- our democratic republic- to undermine it from within.

Islamists, by sheer numbers, will eventually be in a position to vote out democracy in many countries. They will elect Muslims to all positions of local influence, who will create and enforce policies according to the Quran. Once they control a town, they will establish informal Sharia, and there’s nothing the government can (or will want to) do about it.

Oddly enough, our elected officials have entirely overlooked the Islamization of European cities. Many European leaders have acted out of intense fear, granting Muslims the right to create their own shadow governments within countries like Sweden, England, the Netherlands, France, and Belgium, where they control their populations through Sharia Law without any accountability.

America, the greatest superpower on the planet, is gradually losing its power to these newcomers, and out of fear of being labeled racist, they, too, look the other way and remain silent.

The United States was in an excellent place to learn from its fellow European allies and stop this mess of Islamic immigration before it was too late. Even the attacks of 9/11 were not convincing enough for many of our fellow American citizens to wake up!!

Rather than seek a drastic solution to halt the progress of Islam, some of our fellow citizens and elected officials have welcomed more Muslims for resettlement and provided additional resources at the taxpayers’ expense to establish more mosques.

By now, we know that the apparatus that moves Islamic ideology is the life manual of Islam: the Quran, the Hadith, and the Sunna. Unfortunately, Muslims themselves are the ones who Islam most victimizes. They have inherited this viral psychological disease of hate and violence that they live by and transfer it to their children, as well as to sympathetic people in their cause.

It is generally assumed that peaceful religions address matters of importance to daily life and those that transcend it. Religion is believed to exercise a civilizing influence by structuring social life, promoting spirituality, and advancing a range of human virtues. Zoroaster, for instance, based his faith on the triad of good thoughts, good speech, and good deeds; Moses framed the fundamentals of his faith in the Ten Commandments; and Jesus placed love at the core of his beliefs.

Many people adhere to religion to find comfort and guidance in life. These perceived benevolent aspects of religion give it a special status. However, concerns about religious overreach have prompted societies to implement safeguards against that possibility.

The bottom line is that Islam remains a paradox for many, including America’s law enforcement agencies. Many so-called experts have struggled to decipher and understand this ideology, except for a few individuals I know.

It is a virtue to take action to oppose the hateful, a vice to ignore it. It is a virtue to hate tyranny, misogyny, discrimination of all sorts, oppression, and all manner of violations of the legitimate rights of individuals and peoples. Islam is a form of religious fascism, a destroyer of liberty and much of what free people cherish. Therefore, it must be confronted and destroyed ideologically.

Fellow Americans, it is time for us to confront the advancement of Islam in America. The destiny and survival of the free world are at stake. Avoiding this responsibility would be an unpardonable act by every enlightened individual and organization that values humanity.

Life, liberty, and dignity.

©2025 . All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLES:

A Criminal Investigator-Intelligence Analysts’ Handbook of Islam

Grand Mufti of Pakistan declares official World Wide Jihad against Israel and all once Islamic lands

RELATED VIDEO: ‘Women Under Sharia’ with National Security Expert Clare Lopez



The post Islam: America’s Historical Failure appeared first on Dr. Rich Swier.

A Criminal Investigator-Intelligence Analysts’ Handbook of Islam thumbnail

A Criminal Investigator-Intelligence Analysts’ Handbook of Islam

By Amil Imani

Dr. William Gawthrop has written a highly commendable, well-researched, and well-reasoned “handbook for practitioners, analysts, and investigators.”

“William Gawthrop retired after 48 years of service in the United States Army as a counterintelligence officer and a GS-14 intelligence analyst for the United States Government. He is a Joint Military Intelligence College graduate with a Master’s of Science, Strategic Intelligence; the United States Army’s Command and General Staff College; United States Marine Corps Command and Staff College; and the United States Army War College Defense Strategy Course. He earned a Ph.D. in Criminal Justice. His latest book is The Criminal Investigator – Intelligence Analyst’s Handbook of Islam.”

This remarkable book delves into crucial details of many aspects of Islamic law and the ideological motivations of the perpetrators. This book provides excellent references. The civilized world must honor individuals who serve the cause of freedom, often at significant cost to themselves, and even pay the ultimate price for their labor. The fortitude and integrity of someone’s argument are usually best judged not by the force with which it is presented but by the clarity and accuracy with which they offered. Dr. Gawthrop has painstakingly and meticulously presented his new book, The Criminal Investigator’s Handbook of Islam for Intelligence Analysts.

I highly recommend this book to researchers, investigators, and analysts.

If you don’t mind, I’d encourage you to share this with educators, law enforcement, and other trusted individuals.

©2025 . All rights reserved.

The post A Criminal Investigator-Intelligence Analysts’ Handbook of Islam appeared first on Dr. Rich Swier.

Leftist Violence — Angry Student Wrecks Pro-Life Club’s Table thumbnail

Leftist Violence — Angry Student Wrecks Pro-Life Club’s Table

By Conservative Commandos Radio Show and AUN-TV

GUESTS AND TOPICS

MATT LAMB

Matt Lamb is an associate editor for The College Fix. He also writes for LifeSiteNews, AMAC Newsline, and Human Life Review. He has written for the Washington Examiner and Headline USA. He previously worked for Students for Life of America, Students for Life Action, and Turning Point USA, along with Open the Books. The College Fix regularly trains students and helps them find jobs in media, with alumni at Fox News, The Daily Wire, Washington Examiner, National Review, a host of other publications.

TOPIC: Leftist violence — Angry student wrecks pro-life club’s table

RYAN YOUNG

Ryan Young is the senior economist at the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI). His research focuses on regulatory reform, trade policy, antitrust regulation, and other issues.

TOPIC: Tariff relief on electronics

©2025 . All rights reserved.

The post Leftist Violence — Angry Student Wrecks Pro-Life Club’s Table appeared first on Dr. Rich Swier.

Resurrection Hope thumbnail

Resurrection Hope

By Jerry Newcombe, D. Min.

Some modern Americans claim to not fear death. On November 15 last year, boxer Mike Tyson told a 14-year-old girl interviewing him that he has no fear of what happens after he dies.

When he was asked about his legacy after his death, Tyson told her: “It means absolutely nothing to me. I’m just passing through. I’m gonna die and it’s gonna be over. Who cares about legacy after that?”

So, death ends it all, and after that there’s nothing more? Such a view, widely held by some today, contrasts greatly with a Biblical worldview, the view that helped undergird much of the settling and founding of America.

The oldest city in North America is St. Augustine, Florida, founded in 1565. About half a century before, it was discovered by Spanish explorer Ponce de Leon.

He came to the shores of what is today Florida on Easter Sunday, 1513. In his native Spain, the cathedrals were filled with flowers to celebrate the resurrection of Jesus. What the Spanish explorer saw were resplendent flowers in this new land.

So he called it the land of the flower…La Florida. The name stuck (without the “La,” of course).

Easter commemorates the time when Jesus Christ walked out of His own tomb. By His resurrection, He changed everything.

Even the day of the week He arose was changed. Sunday is the Lord’s Day. It is the day that hundreds of millions of people around the world worship Him in honor of His resurrection on that first Easter Sunday.

Even the Constitution talks about the length of days (Sundays excepted) Congressional bills are under consideration to be signed by the president. Sundays excepted shows the founders honored the Lord’s Day, the Christian Sabbath.

Through the centuries many Americans also honor Jesus’s resurrection and His conquering death.

For example, one of the most visited houses in America is Mount Vernon, the home of George Washington, the father of America.

He is buried on the grounds there, and behind the stone coffins that bear his and Martha’s remains is a stone plaque that bears witness to Christ conquering the grave.

The plaque contains the Savior’s words from John 11:25-26: “I am the Resurrection and the Life, sayeth the Lord. He that believeth in me, though he were dead yet shall he live. And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die” I have taken a photo of that plaque.

George Washington was a regular reader of the Bible (KJV) and the Book of Common Prayer (1662), which draws heavily from the KJV.

In 1755, the 23-year-old future president survived a military battle that was a massacre for the British and the American troops together by the French and some Indians, in the greater Pittsburgh area. This was during the French and Indian War.

Washington was the only officer to survive that battle, and apparently there was no chaplain on hand, so George Washington led the funeral service by torchlight for the slain British commander, General Edward Braddock.

The young Virginian used the Book of Common Prayer funeral service that night by torchlight.

The service begins with the declaration of Jesus written above, from John 11, now found behind Washington’s sarcophagus.

Here are some of the other Scripture-based prayers he read that fateful night: “We meekly beseech thee, O Father, to raise us from the death of sin unto the life of righteousness; that, when we shall depart this life, we may rest in him, as our hope is this our brother doth; and that, at the general Resurrection in the last day, we may be found acceptable in thy sight; and receive that blessing, which thy well-beloved Son shall then pronounce to all that love and fear thee…Grant this, we beseech thee, O merciful Father, through Jesus Christ, our Mediator and Redeemer. Amen.”

The Christian view is that Jesus Christ is the Son of God who came into this world for the purpose of redeeming lost humanity. He was fully divine and fully human. He was the only person who ever lived that was sinless.

But on the cross on Good Friday, He became sin for fallen humanity. He was punished for our transgressions. Then He was buried and sealed in a stone-cold tomb with a contingent of Roman guards outside His grave. But on Easter Sunday, He walked out of His tomb and changed all history in the process. It took many appearances to convince His disciples that He was really alive.

But they spread the message, despite great personal cost (including in many cases their own lives). This message of hope and the forgiveness it brings has now spread into all the world and it continues to spread. It is a message of hope for all who believe. It is relevant for all, including boxers, explorers, and presidents.

©2025 All rights reserved.

The post Resurrection Hope appeared first on Dr. Rich Swier.

Comrade Newson and His Filipina Marxist Attorney General Sue President Trump Over Tariffs thumbnail

Comrade Newson and His Filipina Marxist Attorney General Sue President Trump Over Tariffs

By Geoff Ross USN retired Surface Warfare/Air Warfare

The Communist Chinese cheerleader Comrade Governor Newsom is suing the Trump Administration for the tariffs imposed globally initiated to equalize free balanced trade between the United States and other nations.

Newsom is having another one of his Trump Derangement Syndrome episodes as he tries to save his very close relationship with his pals in Communist China and its tyrannical leadership.

Newsom and his waterboy state attorney General (Filipina born) Rob Bonta want a ruling to stop the tariffs because they are hurting California consumers and businesses. Seriously? Sounds like they are worried about Chinese stores going under, not American.

Rob Banta is the same low IQ attorney that tried to eliminate cash bonds for criminals, just let them walk free from jail with no bondsman. He also banned private prisons. He even prosecuted companies for so-called excessive carbon emissions.

Perhaps the State Department should look at Comrade Banta’s immigration status and send his Marxist ass back to Quezon City in the Philippines where he was born and then he can focus on their air quality which is actually bad unlike California.

Newsom is also crying that more than 60,000 businesses in California export goods, apparently mainly to Communist China. Well the solution is to export California goods to friendly countries, not a country hell bent on invading Taiwan, a country trying to take complete control of the South China Sea and threatening the Philippines, Thailand and Australian economic fishing zones.

Newsom is also saying that tariffs will affect the procurement of construction materials critical to rebuild parts of Los Angeles, (Pacific Palisades) an illegal immigrant controlled city burned to a crisp from the fires his administration created by lack of forest management and failing to provide water to the fire fighters to save a fish.

Newsom says he needs timber, wood, steel, aluminum, and drywall products which are all available for procurement in the United States but Newsom wants to purchase these products from Communist China and the future 51st state of the United States Canada.

Newsom also fails to mention that the Mayor of Los Angeles a Communist Cuba government sympathiser, has yet to issue a single building permit so new home construction can begin using debris clearing as an excuse.

So while Comrade Newsom reminisces on his past trips to Communist China to discuss the fraudulent climate change agenda and his unconstitutional ban on the sale of new gasoline powered vehicles, lawn mowers, leaf blowers. BBQ grills and farm equipment.

With zero diplomatic experience, he actually spent more time meeting with his Communist Chinese pals discussing trade agreements of which California and the United States were always on the losing end of the deal, but not anymore. Not with Trump running things.

Governor Newsom and other Communist sympathisers in the Democrat Party have zero objectives to make America and California great again. They are concerned only with appeasing their handlers in the Chinese Communist Party leadership who have made significant inroads into state and local government blue states like California.

It’s very difficult for the Communist Chinese to infiltrate the Trump Federal level of leadership so they focus on weak local blue state operations like California. Vermont, Colorado, Minnesota and Massachusetts. Just follow the money and the politicians frequent trips to Beijing.

Governor Newsom and a few others like him are a bigger threat to our republic than the Communist Chinese because he (they) have control internally of their states like California. But, Trump will win and he will make America great again no matter how many of these low life bottom feeding Marxists cockroaches in the local and blue state governments try to stop him.

©2025 . All rights reserved.

The post Comrade Newson and His Filipina Marxist Attorney General Sue President Trump Over Tariffs appeared first on Dr. Rich Swier.

America at the Tipping Point thumbnail

America at the Tipping Point

By Amil Imani

First published in 2019

Yet, too few people are discussing it or talking about it. Why? Many Americans have been conditioned to be tolerant and compassionate, to embrace multiculturalism, and to respect each other’s beliefs, ideals, and values. That’s wonderful in a utopian world, but the fact is, Islam doesn’t embrace any aspect of Western civilization—much less American culture. We said on 9/11 that we’d “never forget,” but guess what? Many of us have. America is slowly and methodically being dismantled as a nation by Islamic subversion, and our cherished freedoms are more fragile than ever. While we know how to fight the enemy abroad with combat troops, intelligence, and drone strikes, we’re doing nothing to combat the very same enemy that resides on our soil in broad daylight.

Let me be clear: if we don’t defeat Islam politically and quickly here, without a doubt, our children and grandchildren will be engaged in a religious and ideological bloody war, the likes of which have never been seen on American soil before. Just the other day, one day after the 9/11 anniversary, another Muslim, Zulfat Suara, “became first elected to Nashville office, winning at-large Metro Council seat,” and we all have already witnessed the two junior Muslim Congresswomen, Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib’s public discourse in the U.S. Congress. Wait, there are a lot more Muslims who plan to run in the 2020 elections and beyond.

And because a Muslim must follow Islamic laws and not man-made laws like the US Constitution, a Muslim can never be both a Muslim and an American at the same time. It is impossible. That’s where the clash begins, and no elected official in this country is willing to or wants to take the bull by the horns and discuss it. What a shame!

Do all Muslims adhere to the commands of the Quran? No, thank God. However, as they integrate into their communities and increase in numbers, they tend to become more militant and less tolerant of the laws and regulations of those communities. Any religion whose holy book instructs its followers to commit acts that contradict the rules of this country should not only lose its tax-exempt status but also forfeit its First Amendment protection and be banned from the United States altogether.

In countries such as France, Britain, and several North African countries, where Islamic enclaves and ghettos have emerged, local mullahs enforce Sharia law despite its conflict with national or state laws. What many Americans fail to understand is that Sharia law forms the foundation of Islamic theocracy and totalitarianism. The establishment of global Sharia law serves as their ultimate goal. The Quran is clear in its directive to Muslims to create a global Islamic state (Caliphate), over which the Islamic messiah, or Mahdi, will rule with Sharia as the sole law of the land. There is no mistake: this is the intent of influential Islamic elements in America.

The problem is too few Americans are aware of it, and organizations like the Muslim Brotherhood and CAIR are taking full advantage of American’s naiveté. On top of that, a consortium composed of pandering liberal politicians, blinded by short-term self-interest and egotism, attention and fund-seeking self-proclaimed prima donna professors, and bastions of useful idiots, are the witting or unwitting promoters of Islamism.

Understand that Sharia is very complex and derived from multiple Islamic sources. The Quran, considered the “uncreated word of Allah,” is the primary source of Sharia law. The Hadith (sayings and actions of Muhammad) is the second most crucial document in Sharia. Historic rulings by jurists over the years and so-called reasoning by analogy make up the other two less influential sources of Sharia. Together, they constitute Islam’s theological core, and they result in a totalitarian way of life for Muslim followers and non-Muslims.

Honor killings, marital rape, female genital mutilation, severing of hands and feet are but a few of the other components of Sharia law. When Muslim men are directed to beat their wives for rejecting sexual advances, it’s evident that American values are in direct conflict with what Islamic law requires of its followers. So, how do we reconcile this?  We can’t!

In short, we need to open our eyes and see how the scheme played out in Europe. Much of Europe is already past the stage of no return. This is not a game. This is real. This ideology will devour your entire family, both Republicans and Democrats, if not now, soon enough. Americans need to wake up now and stop Islam from growing to the point of no return.

©2025 . All rights reserved.

The post America at the Tipping Point appeared first on Dr. Rich Swier.

FEC Opens Probe of Jasmine Crockett and Trump Signals Support for Religious Americans thumbnail

FEC Opens Probe of Jasmine Crockett and Trump Signals Support for Religious Americans

By Conservative Commandos Radio Show and AUN-TV

GUESTS AND TOPICS

STEPHANIE N. TAUB

Stephanie N. Taub serves as Senior Counsel with First Liberty Institute, focusing on restoring religious liberty in the marketplace. At First Liberty, she advocates for the rights of employees and business leaders of faith to work with integrity, consistent with their religious convictions. Taub has authored pieces published by National Review and the Federalist Society and has appeared on Fox News. The Texas Review of Law and Politics published her article on federal employment law protections for faith-based employers. The article elaborates on the statutory right of religious institutions to cultivate communities of faith.

TOPIC: President Trump signals support for religious Americans

FRED LUCAS

Fred Lucas is the Manager of the Investigative Reporting Project at The Daily Signal. He is an award-winning journalist and veteran White House correspondent who has written and reported for Fox News, Newsweek, National Review, History Magazine Quarterly, The Washington Examiner, Newsmax, TheBlaze, Townhall, The Federalist, The National Interest, The American Spectator, The American Conservative, and other outlets. Before going to Washington, he reported on state capitals in Kentucky and Connecticut.

TOPIC: FEC Opens Probe of Jasmine Crockett



©2025 . All rights reserved.

The post FEC Opens Probe of Jasmine Crockett and Trump Signals Support for Religious Americans appeared first on Dr. Rich Swier.

EXCLUSIVE: Election Integrity Watchdog Skewers Michigan Gubernatorial Candidate For Allowing Illegals To Vote thumbnail

EXCLUSIVE: Election Integrity Watchdog Skewers Michigan Gubernatorial Candidate For Allowing Illegals To Vote

By The Daily Caller

The Fair Election Fund, an election integrity watchdog organization, is launching a new effort to hold each secretary of state in battleground states accountable in how they oversee elections, starting with Michigan’s Jocelyn Benson, the Daily Caller has learned.

The Fair Election Fund is releasing a new report on Monday about Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson detailing her “performance administering recent elections with a focus on the 2024 campaign,” according to materials obtained by the Caller. The organization writes in its 51-page report, obtained by the Caller, that they are giving Benson a “D” grade, arguing that she undermined “the confidence of voters in Michigan” and even most recently admitted that at least 15 non-citizens voted in the previous election.

“Fair Election Fund’s analysis revealed numerous examples of Secretary Benson failing to enforce existing election laws. These actions resulted in lawsuits brought by election officials, concerned citizens, and a variety of organizations in the lead up to the 2024 election,” the report writes.

“The lawsuits challenging Secretary Benson’s actions routinely resulted in courts finding her actions were unlawful,” the report continues.

The press release on the report notes that the organization’s review comes after Benson and the state of Michigan released its own review of the 2024 election, finding that 15 non-citizens likely voted in November.

“This is a serious issue, one we must address with a scalpel, not a sledgehammer,” Benson, who recently announced a run for governor to succeed Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, wrote in a press release.

The Fair Election Fund contrasts Benson’s report with her decision on Thursday to oppose the “the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act” which would require voters to prove that they are a U.S. citizen at the polls using their passport or birth certificate. The House of Representatives voted 220 to 208 in favor of the act on Thursday.

The organization also writes that under Benson’s watch, a Chinese national allegedly voted in the 2024 general election. Michigan officials brought charges against the Chinese national in October.

“Nine days before Election Day 2024, Haoxiang Gao — a 19-year-old Chinese national studying at the University of Michigan — registered to vote using his student ID, signed a document attesting that he was a United States citizen, and cast a ballot at an early voting site in Ann Arbor, Michigan,” the report reads. “Importantly, Gao was caught because he turned himself in by contacting the local clerk and asking for his ballot back — Benson’s voter-fraud defenses clearly failed.”

The watchdog also pointed to a judge’s decision to strike down Benson’s order instructing clerks to initially presume the validity of absentee ballot signatures. The Republican National Committee sued the Michigan secretary of state over the order.

Michigan Court of Claims Judge Christopher Yates struck down the guidance in June, writing that it was “a foul under Michigan law.”

“This was particularly egregious because this is not the first time Secretary Benson had attempted to create a presumption of validity for signatures — it was at minimum her third attempt. In 2020, she attempted to create the presumption by including it in her guidance to clerks, which ultimately resulted in a court ruling her actions were unlawful and violated the Michigan’s administrative procedure act,” the Fair Election Fund wrote in its report.

The Fair Election Fund also pointed to the state’s voter rolls and how they were maintained as a reason for their low grade for Benson.

“Benson admitted that in 2020 the Michigan voter rolls lacked ‘sufficient comprehensive efforts’ to maintain clean voter rolls, but only after she vigorously denied and fought the allegation that voter rolls were bloated,” the organization wrote.

The RNC sued Benson in March 2024, alleging that the state is failing to abide by the National Voter Registration Act’s (NVRA) requirement that voter rolls must keep “clean and accurate voter registration records.” The suit, however, was tossed out.

“While the RNC’s suit was dismissed on legal technicalities about whether they were ‘injured’ by the out-of-balance voter rolls and whether their claim was properly formatted, a conclusion the RNC is appealing, any objective comparison of Michigan’s voter roll maintenance to that of other states shows that Michigan can — and should — be more diligent in managing its voter rolls,” the Fair Election Fund writes.

“Benson admitted that in 2020 the Michigan voter rolls lacked ‘sufficient comprehensive efforts’ to maintain clean voter rolls, but only after she vigorously denied and fought the allegation that voter rolls were bloated. The court in the RNC’s suit granted her a temporary reprieve, but it remains to be seen whether she will again change her tune, do an about face, and announce that the voter rolls are bloated,” the report continues.

Benson’s office did not respond to a request for comment in time for publication.

AUTHOR

Reagan Reese

White House correspondent. Follow Reagan on Twitter.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Just Four Dems Vote To Keep Non-Citizens From Voting In U.S. Elections

Arizona Counties Agree to Cross-Check Voter Rolls for Noncitizens

RELATED VIDEO: Antonio Gracias: How both Social Security fraud and Voter Fraud works in 12 minutes

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

The post EXCLUSIVE: Election Integrity Watchdog Skewers Michigan Gubernatorial Candidate For Allowing Illegals To Vote appeared first on Dr. Rich Swier.

Critically Thinking About Success: Part 2 thumbnail

Critically Thinking About Success: Part 2

By John Droz, Jr.

Applying the Success Equation to U.S. K-12 Education. 

This is a follow-up to Critically Thinking about Success (Part 1). I’m following the same format, but looking at how we can achieve success by relatively quickly fixing America’s totally broken K-12 education system…

I’ve always had a fascination with why certain people stood out from the crowd and were successful. As I developed my Critical Thinking skills, I researched and paid attention to what common traits these people had — and applied them to a variety of issues that I’ve dealt with.

I contend if we follow the five Traits below, that will maximize our chances of success regarding what to do with the Department of Education (DOEd)…

Successful people are often called dreamers — as they see possibilities that almost everyone else discards as pie-in-the-sky. But their dreams have at least three characteristics:

a) they are precise (not vague),

b) they are aspirational, and

c) they are within reason. These three attributes help a believer to stay focused on their vision.

The VISION is: to transform DOEd so that it facilitates a significant improvement of the US K-12 education system, within five (5) years.

As with almost all visions of successful people, the vast majority of citizens will be skeptical that this can be done. They will have an array of excuses (like the fifteen listed here), but to Critical Thinkers, there are legitimate counters to every concern regarding DOEd.

One way or another, almost everything has already been done before. (In fact, many historians look at history as a collection of repetitious cycles. A related famous saying is: “If you don’t learn from history, you are doomed to repeat it.”)

There are two primary ways of learning: Education or Experience. I found that those who are successful maximize the education part. In other words, a significant key to success is to learn as much as possible from the failures and accomplishments of others.

Most people are saying something like: “Get rid of DOEd because they have been a disaster.” That statement is absolutely true, but is getting rid of DOEd our best option to bring about our Vision? Unequivocally NO!

Critical Thinkers will approach this situation by saying: “Let’s identify and learn from the multitude of DOEd mistakes made in the past — and see that the transformed DOEd avoids those pitfalls.”

For example, Critical Thinkers will notice that DOEd never spelled out what the top priorities were for our K-12 education system! That is a simply stunning omission that explains a lot.

The good news is that this is easy to fix quickly. This error is compounded by the fact that when I read the Mission Statements of all fifty State Education Departments, there is zero uniformity among these!

So a powerful role that DOEd can play is leadership. The goal would be to get all States to have the same K-12 education objectives. How they achieve them will be left up to each State. See fifteen examples where DOEd leadership can be an extraordinary game changer.

We ALL have been presented with (and will continue to be in the future) multiple opportunities. Unfortunately, many people don’t recognize most opportunities until they are in the rearview mirror. Successful people have developed the acuity to recognize a much greater selection of opportunities than others do.

We literally have in our grasp a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to quickly and substantially improve the American K-12 education system. Again please carefully read fifteen powerful examples of what can easily be done.

To not take full advantage of this opportunity will in the future be looked at as a watershed mistake in American history. To consciously choose to make the situation worse (by turning over K-12 education to some fifty failing bureaucracies) would be criminal.

There are talkers and doers… Recognition of opportunities is an essential matter — but it is for naught if it isn’t acted on.

As a physicist, I can tell you that one of the fundamental principles of physics is the Law of Inertia. Basically what it means is that it takes more energy (effort) to get a stopped object to move forward, than it takes to get an already moving object to continue to move forward. The same applies to organizations. If their leaders are in a moving forward mindset, they will be more open to opportunities than someone who is defensively protecting their turf, or who simply decides a priori that something can’t be done, is too much trouble, etc.

The facts are that DOEd Secretary Linda McMahon:

1) can fire anyone at DOEd,

2) can hire anyone for DOEd,

3) can establish whatever policies and procedures she wants,

4) can spend $80± BILLION of annual discretionary funds anyway she sees fit, etc., etc.

What this means is that Linda can scrap the entire DOEd and start over —with essentially full control over every important aspect of it. In other words, Linda has the power to transform DOEd into a major beneficial force regarding American K-12 education.

This needs to be fully appreciated as an unprecedented opportunity, which requires prompt, meaningful action on her part to have DOEd blossom into a fabulously powerful force for good.

Every lofty goal comes with an assortment of obstacles. If they weren’t there everyone else would be doing it, and it would no longer be a lofty goal — it would be an everyday matter. So having a positive, persistent attitude is a key attribute of successful people.

There will be obstructions and obstacles in transforming DOEd into what it should be — like a large collection of vocal naysayers who lack the vision of how to convert DOEd into a major success.

We need to keep our eye on the prize, which means staying focused on the extraordinary benefits to America from starting to annually graduate 4± million well-educated, thinking citizens (instead of what’s happening now: annually graduating 4± million non-thinking citizens who are indoctrinated with progressive ideology). Reversing those figures would be profoundly beneficial to America’s future.

There are no guarantees in life. Even if you adopt the above five traits, unforeseen circumstances might derail an otherwise good plan. I have a few adages I adhere to, and the most important one is: “Work as if everything depends on you, but pray as if everything depends on God.”

The benefits from properly transforming DOEd reimburse every cost and sacrifice at least a hundred times over. All we need is the vision and an unwavering commitment to make it happen.

©2025   All rights reserved.

Here is other information from this scientist that you might find interesting:

I am now offering incentives for you to sign up new subscribers!

I also consider reader submissions on Critical Thinking on my topics of interest.

Check out the Archives of this Critical Thinking substack.

WiseEnergy.orgdiscusses the Science (or lack thereof) behind our energy options.

C19Science.infocovers the lack of genuine Science behind our COVID-19 policies.

Election-Integrity.infomultiple major reports on the election integrity issue.

Media Balance Newsletter: a free, twice-a-month newsletter that covers what the mainstream media does not do, on issues from COVID to climate, elections to education, renewables to religion, etc. Here are the Newsletter’s 2024 Archives. Please send me an email to get your free copy. When emailing me, please make sure to include your full name and the state where you live. (Of course, you can cancel the Media Balance Newsletter at any time – but why would you?

Bill Maher Says His Dinner With Trump Showed ‘Why The Democrats Are So Unpopular’ thumbnail

Bill Maher Says His Dinner With Trump Showed ‘Why The Democrats Are So Unpopular’

By The Daily Caller

HBO host Bill Maher on Friday described President Donald Trump as a “possible friend” while reporting on a star-studded dinner at the White House and lambasted critics who said he should have refused to meet with the Republican president because of all the areas where they disagreed.

Maher joined UFC President Dana White and musician Kid Rock at the White House for the dinner, which took place in late March. During the “Real Time with Bill Maher” show’s monologue, the comedian described speaking candidly about policies he disagreed with, and said Trump’s “no anger” reactions during the dinner were “emblematic” of why the Democratic Party was unpopular.

“Honestly, I voted for Clinton and Obama, but I would never feel comfortable talking to them the way I was able to talk with Donald Trump,” Maher said during a 13-minute report on the dinner. “That’s just how it went down, make of it what you will. Me, I feel it’s emblematic of why the Democrats are so unpopular these days.”

WATCH:

Maher described how he disagreed with Democrats on multiple issues, notably Israel’s war with the radical Islamic terrorist group Hamas, child sex changes, biological men competing in women’s sports and wokeness. He related his favorite moment of the dinner.

“So MAGA fans, don’t worry, your boy gave me nothing, just hats. Hats and a very generous amount of time and a willingness to listen and accept me as a possible friend even though I’m not MAGA, which was the point of the dinner,” Maher said. “My favorite part of the whole night was [when] we were standing in the blowjob room — we were — and he said, ‘You know, I’ve heard from a lot of people who really like that we’re having this dinner. Not all, but a lot.’ And I said ‘Same. A lot of people told me they loved it, but not all.’ And we agreed, the people who don’t even want us to talk, we don’t like you.”

After audience applause from the reference to former President Bill Clinton’s liaisons with former White House intern Monica Lewinsky died down, Maher then tore into those who didn’t like his attendance at the dinner, taking aim at Democratic Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey’s record-setting Senate speech.

“Don’t talk. As opposed to what, writing the same editorial for the millionth time and making 25-hour speeches into the wind?” Maher asked. “Really, that’s what liberals have? He takes the piss out of everybody else and we can hold ours?”

“Okay, that’s my report. You can hate me for it, but I’m not a liar. Trump was gracious and measured and why he isn’t that in other settings, I don’t know and I can’t answer. And it’s not my place to answer, I’m just telling you what I saw,” Maher continued. “And I wasn’t high. Damn! Missed opportunity.”

AUTHOR

Harold Hutchison

Reporter.

RELATED ARTICLE: Hollywood Actor Defends Child Sex Changes With Bizarre Analogy About ‘Suppressed’ Left-Handed People

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

John Cornyn: The ‘Mirage of Texas Conservatism’ thumbnail

John Cornyn: The ‘Mirage of Texas Conservatism’

By Amil Imani

Senator John Cornyn has long positioned himself as a stalwart of Texas values — challenging on borders, supportive of law and order, and a champion of conservative principles. Yet, beneath the polished rhetoric and carefully crafted image lies a troubling pattern of inconsistency that undermines his credibility. Cornyn’s tenure reveals a disappointing truth for conservatives who value results over promises: he excels at talking the talk but falters when it’s time to walk the walk. This is not a mere partisan jab but a call to scrutinize a record that fails to deliver the decisive action Texans deserve.

Cornyn’s most glaring shortfall is his handling of immigration, a cornerstone issue for any Texas Republican. He has repeatedly pledged to secure the border and tackle illegal immigration, resonating with the state’s right-leaning electorate. In a 2020 Spanish-language ad, he even claimed to “strongly support the legalization of Dreamers,” a bold statement aimed at softening his image among Latino voters. However, his voting record tells a different story. As highlighted by America’s Voice, Cornyn voted against the Dream Act in 2010 and opposed bipartisan immigration reform bills in 2006, 2007, and 2013, measures that included provisions for Dreamers alongside enhanced border security. This dissonance between words and actions has earned him the moniker “Cornyn Con,” a term that encapsulates his knack for promising much and delivering little.

For conservatives, this is not merely a flip-flop; it represents a betrayal of principle. Border security is non-negotiable in a state like Texas, where illegal crossings strain local resources and fuel national debates. Yet, Cornyn’s tenure as a senior senator – including his time as Senate Majority Whip from 2015 to 2019 – has coincided with ongoing border challenges. Critics argue he has squandered opportunities to advocate for robust, conservative-led solutions. Instead, he often aligns with establishment inertia, as evidenced by his support for President Trump’s border wall funding while neglecting the broader inefficiencies of federal immigration policy. The Texas Tribune pointed out his absence from a 2019 vote to overturn Trump’s emergency declaration, a move that diverted $265 million from Texas military bases – a decision that many conservatives viewed as prioritizing political loyalty over state interests.

Cornyn’s apologists might label him a pragmatist navigating a divided Senate, but for the true conservative base – those aligned with warriors like Ken Paxton – this is a feeble excuse for spinelessness. Consider his ineffective 2021 immigration discussions with Senators Kyrsten Sinema and Thom Tillis. Cornyn hinted at a deal, then proposed a cowardly plan covering only 650,000 “active” DACA recipients, neglecting the 3 million invaders that the House-passed Dream and Promise Act – a deplorable amnesty giveaway – would coddle. Paxton, who has fought vigorously to dismantle DACA as an illegal affront to Texas sovereignty, would view this as a capitulation to the open-border crowd. The Washington Post derided it as a GOP tactic – feigned compromise followed by finger-pointing when it fails. For hardcore Texas patriots, this isn’t leadership; it’s treasonous evasion by a RINO who prefers appeasement over confrontation.

Beyond immigration, Cornyn’s record raises broader concerns about his commitment to fiscal conservatism and limited government – hallmarks of the GOP base. He voted for the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, a victory for supply-side enthusiasts, but also supported excessive spending bills that inflated the national debt. The Congressional Budget Office projected that deficits soared past $1 trillion annually during his tenure, a trend that frustrates fiscal hawks who expected more pushback from a supposed conservative stalwart. His lukewarm response to the 2020 COVID-19 relief debates – dismissively tweeting “blah blah blah” in reaction to Democrat objections, according to America’s Voice – further highlights a lack of seriousness regarding economic stewardship.

Cornyn’s nearly perfect 95% Trump loyalty score might fool some MAGA diehards, but it serves as a red flag for true conservatives – like Ken Paxton – who don’t bow to any White House, even Trump’s. His cowardice during the family separation crisis – a policy that Paxton would have supported to keep illegal families off Texas soil – reveals his gutless core. He expressed weak “concerns” in 2018, too timid to endorse a hardline stance or advocate for its end on principle. From Paxton’s perspective, defending the border means no mercy and no retreat; Cornyn’s meekness isn’t toughness- it’s a traitor’s timidity.

Texas deserves a senator who combines rhetoric with resolve. Cornyn’s 20-year tenure, though marked by electoral success, lacks the transformative victories conservatives desire. His immigration inconsistencies, fiscal variability, and reluctance to challenge party orthodoxy depict a career politician more focused on self-preservation than on bold governance. As the state becomes increasingly diverse and competitive – evidenced by tightening GOP margins in recent elections – conservatives should demand a leader who delivers, not one who merely makes promises.

John Cornyn’s façade of principled leadership has persisted too long; it’s time for a reckoning.

©2025 . All rights reserved.

Critically Thinking About Success thumbnail

Critically Thinking About Success

By John Droz, Jr.

Plus some tidbits from my personal experiences. 

I’ve always had a fascination with why certain people stood out from the crowd and were successful. As I developed my Critical Thinking skills, I researched and paid attention to what were common traits these people had — and applied them to myself. I’m sharing these with you and then will show an example of how I personally utilized this information.

[Note: The example I am citing below is financial success, but the traits apply to any type of success.]

Successful people are often called dreamers — as they see possibilities that almost everyone else discards as pie-in-the-sky. But their dreams have at least three characteristics:

a) they are precise (not vague),

b) they are aspirational, and

c) they are within reason (not that you are going to beat Tiger Woods’ golf records).

These three attributes help a believer to stay focused on their vision.

When I was 25 my vision was: I wanted to be able to retire by the time I was 40.

I had an interesting job at GE Aerospace (and was soon promoted to management), but I had other interests in life. To be able to enjoy them, I needed to be financially independent, so that I would be able to go where I wanted, and do what I wanted, when I wanted. I shared my vision with some co-workers and friends. They smiled and said: “That’s nice — good luck with that!”

Even though I didn’t know anyone who retired by 40 (through their own efforts), this was a high goal that I was quite sure was doable if I adequately applied myself to it.

One way or another, almost everything has already been done before. (In fact, many historians look at history as a collection of repetitious cycles. A related famous saying is: “If you don’t learn from history, you are doomed to repeat it.”) There are two primary ways of learning: Education or Experience. I found that those who are successful maximize the education part. In other words, a significant key to success is to learn as much as possible from the accomplishments and failures of others.

After considering (and in some cases trying out) several strategies to bring about retirement by 40, I decided to invest in real estate. A critically thinking person knows that a trial and error (i.e., the experience) approach to real estate investing (or any other such option) likely takes way too long (putting at risk my goal of 40), and will also likely result in unnecessary financial and other setbacks that could jeopardize the whole plan.

I did not have the benefit of knowing anyone who had done this, so I chose to learn from strangers. I went to a local bookstore and bought every book they had on investing in real estate. Over the next year or so I carefully read some fifty of those books. Some books were fabulous and others I maybe only picked up one good idea. However, my perspective was that one usable idea could give me $10,000 profit — so that was a good return on a $20 investment (for the book) and 3± hours of reading.

We ALL have been presented with (and will continue to be in the future) multiple opportunities. Unfortunately, many people don’t recognize most opportunities until they are in the rearview mirror. Successful people have developed the acuity to recognize a much greater selection of opportunities than others do.

I was in rural upstate NY, which was not identified by anyone as a hot spot for real estate investing. That said, my real estate investment crash course (the 50± books) gave me some ideas about what to look for. Before buying any property I also created my own documents that would help me assess opportunities — like a Return on Investment (ROI) form.

BTW, some of the 50± books I read were on Income Taxes, as understanding (and taking advantage of) tax laws is a very important part of a successful real estate investment strategy. It also clarified for me what category of real estate I should be investing in.

There are talkers and doers… Recognition of opportunities is an essential matter — but it is for naught if it isn’t acted on.

As a physicist, I can tell you that one of the fundamental principles of physics is the Law of Inertia. Basically what it means is that it takes more energy (effort) to get a stopped object to move forward, than it takes to get an already moving object to continue to move forward. The same applies to people. If you are in a moving forward mindset, you will be more open to opportunities than someone who is defensively protecting their turf, or who simply decides a priori that something can’t be done, is too much trouble, etc.

All the planning in the world means little if you aren’t willing to jump into the deep end. Shortly after the book education phase, I started making offers on select real estate properties. The details of getting appropriate real estate brokers, lawyers, banks, etc. is too long to go into here, but I also did that.

Before I got married (age 26) I had purchased my first real estate investment, as well as a home. My wife was on board and was supportive in several ways. We were on our way!

Every lofty goal comes with an assortment of obstacles. If they weren’t there everyone else would be doing it, and it would no longer be a lofty goal — it would be an everyday matter. So having a positive, persistent attitude is a key attribute of successful people.

From the get-go, I had several challenges regarding my real estate investing plan. One example is that I had limited cash to buy properties. As a 25-year-old, I had already started saving but had not had enough years to accumulate an appreciable amount. Once again I turned to the 50± books I had read for clever ideas on leveraging, etc.

There were multiple other problems to deal with. For example, we bought a home in November, that had been shut down. The Realtor assured us that the water had been properly drained. I worked on upgrading the unheated home over the Winter. In the Spring when I turned on the water, I ended up having to repair some 40 pipe breaks and leaks — some within walls. Ugh. The water had only been shut off, not properly drained. Lesson learned.

There are no guarantees in life. Even if you adopt the above five traits, unforeseen circumstances might derail an otherwise good plan. I have a few adages I adhere to, and the most important one is: “Work as if everything depends on you, but pray as if everything depends on God.” This perspective has worked for me, but you decide what’s best for you.

Here is the result of my real estate saga. Since I was paying close attention (not just robotically going forward), I realized when I was 34 that I had attained my goal of financial independence — several years ahead of schedule. So I formally retired from my management job at GE. (I remember at my exit interview the higher level manager told me that he thought my “retirement” was a ploy to get a promotion. Funny.) My wife also retired from her executive secretary position at a major manufacturing company.

Subsequently, many people asked how we were able to retire at age 34. If they seemed to be genuinely interested I would outline the plan I adopted. To this day I’m surprised how many people’s first reaction was something like “You were lucky!”

A careful reader will know that luck had very little to do with it…

The plan for my next Substack commentary is to show how success with the failing US K-12 education system is finally in our grasp — but it means applying the above five traits.

©2025 All rights reserved.

Here is other information from this scientist that you might find interesting:

I am now offering incentives for you to sign up new subscribers!

I also consider reader submissions on Critical Thinking on my topics of interest.

Check out the Archives of this Critical Thinking substack.

WiseEnergy.orgdiscusses the Science (or lack thereof) behind our energy options.

C19Science.infocovers the lack of genuine Science behind our COVID-19 policies.

Election-Integrity.infomultiple major reports on the election integrity issue.

Media Balance Newsletter: a free, twice-a-month newsletter that covers what the mainstream media does not do, on issues from COVID to climate, elections to education, renewables to religion, etc. Here are the Newsletter’s 2024 Archives. Please send me an email to get your free copy. When emailing me, please make sure to include your full name and the state where you live. (Of course, you can cancel the Media Balance Newsletter at any time – but why would you?

Conservatives Shut Out By ‘Big Law’ Have Little Sympathy As Firms Face Major Upset Under Trump thumbnail

Conservatives Shut Out By ‘Big Law’ Have Little Sympathy As Firms Face Major Upset Under Trump

By The Daily Caller

Lawyers who faced professional penalties for standing by President Donald Trump can’t help but view objections of law firms targeted by executive orders as hypocritical.

Those now positioning themselves as defenders of the legal system did nothing when Trump-allied attorneys were losing their law licenses and major firms were refusing to back the president, conservative supporters of Trump’s efforts say.

“Their silence in the face of the same conduct over the past 4 years against lawyers (including me) who represented President Trump is deafening,” John Eastman told the Daily Caller News Foundation.

Following an order in February stripping security clearances from attorneys at Covington & Burling, the firm representing former special counsel Jack Smith, Trump fired off a series of orders limiting some of the nation’s top law firms’ access to government contracts and buildings.

Three firms targeted by executive orders, Perkins Coie, WilmerHale and Jenner & Block, have opted to fight back in court. Other firms — among them Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher and Flom; Willkie Farr & Gallagher; Milbank; and Paul Weiss — struck deals with the administration to provide millions in pro bono legal services and avoid diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) practices.

Eastman, who faced disbarment proceedings in California for aiding Trump’s effort challenge the 2020 election results, is unsure whether Trump’s orders will be upheld but finds it fascinating that “law firms and blue state AGs are weighing in screaming about how improper it is to target lawyers because of their representation of clients unpopular with the administration.” He is currently appealing last year’s California State Bar recommendation that he be disbarred.

“In my view, the only way to defeat the lawfare and weaponization of the last 4 years is to apply it on a reciprocal [basis] so that the perpetrators of that lawfare feel the heat now that the [shoe] is on the other foot,” Eastman told the DCNF. “Much like the Independent Prosecutor statute, which was weaponized against the Reagan Administration, went the way of the dodo bird once it was turned on the Clinton Administration.”

Big Law, Big Lib

Support for left-wing causes in “Big Law” firms is pervasive. A 2024 study by Notre Dame law professor Derek Muller found that 95% of pro bono amicus briefs filed by Big Law firms on issues of highest salience like abortion or LGBTQ issues took the liberal side, while 64% of the total 851 briefs analyzed supported the liberal position.

Fifth Circuit Judge James Ho made a similar observation in a March concurrence, writing that judges “shouldn’t be surprised when ‘topflight’ firms consistently jump in on only one side of politically charged disputes.”

Some of Trump’s legal allies see the orders as a smart way to right the ship — or at least save it from sinking into a complete ideological takeover.

1/8 Let me comment on what’s going on with the prominent law firms, often called BigLaw (a world I come out of but have been unjustly canceled from due to allegations both fake and which profoundly misunderstand how Article II of the Constitution and its adjacent legal…

— Jeff Clark (@JeffClarkUS) March 22, 2025

“Thank goodness for Trump, who saw that in just the span of 20 years, BigLaw had become so monolithic and dominated by the Left that he had to take some action to push back on these firms,” Jeff Clark, a former DOJ official who Trump recently selected to run the White House’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), wrote on X. “Allowing the trend to continue threatens liberty because the best legal know-how and resources are only put only on one side, accelerating a leftist political monopoly that would have destroyed the country and made it unrecognizable if it had not been halted.”

Clark was named a defendant in the now-doomed case brought against Trump by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, who was disqualified from prosecuting it in December due to her romantic relationship with a special prosecutor she appointed. The D.C. Bar disciplinary panel also recommended suspending his law license in August.

During the 2020 election, Trump was “starved of BigLaw support while Biden had his pick of the litter,” Clark noted on X.

“In just 20 years — from 2000 when BigLaw firm Gibson Dunn represented Bush the younger in Bush v Gore — not a single big firm would step up to try to help President Trump, which is backwards because (putting aside the anomaly of a big polling bounce after 9/11), President Trump is far more popular with ordinary people in larger numbers than Bush 43 ever was,” he wrote.

Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, formerly a registered Democrat, left his post as partner at the oldest Wall Street law firm in 2023 to defend President Donald Trump in the case brought by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg.

Blanche’s former firm, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, signed a pro bono deal of at least $100 million with the administration on Friday, Trump announced on Truth Social.

Mike Davis, founder of the Article III project, told the DCNF that firms are going to feel the “legal, political and financial consequences” for lawfare against Trump, his aides and allies.

“What client is going to hire a law firm with Trump’s scarlet letter on it?” he said.

‘Making Big Law Great Again’

The pressure is bringing tensions inside and outside firms to a tipping point.

Over 500 firms signed on to an amicus brief filed by former Obama solicitor general Donald Beaton Verrilli Jr. in support of Perkins Coie.

Some law students at top schools are reconsidering offers to work at firms that made deals, with students at Georgetown Law canceling a recruiting event with Skadden Arps, the Wall Street Journal reported.

At Harvard Law School, more than 90 professors signed a letter to students that decried “severe challenges to the rule of law” taking place under the Trump administration.

Harvard law professor Adrian Vermeule objected to his colleagues’ letter, writing in an open letter on substack that it “attempts to appropriate a shared ideal and turn it to sectarian ends, implicitly aiming to define anyone who disagrees as an opponent of the rule of law altogether.”

“Where were the letter’s signatories when federal prosecutors took the unprecedented step of bringing dozens of criminal charges against a former president, who also happened to be the leading electoral opponent of the then-incumbent president?” Vermeule questioned. “Where were the signatories when Jeff Clark, Rudy Giuliani, John Eastman, and other lawyers were disbarred or threatened with disbarment, and indeed prosecuted, for their representation of President Trump? Was this not a threat to the rule of law? Where were the signatories when radical activists menaced Supreme Court Justices in their homes, or when a mob hammered on the doors of the Supreme Court itself?”

White House spokesman Harrison Fields told the DCNF that Trump is “Making Big Law Great Again.”

“Instead of using their power and influence to make our country dangerous and less free, Big Law is working to use its access to the federal government for good,” he said. “This is only possible because of the swift leadership of President Trump to hold Big Law accountable.”

Some conservatives see things differently. Paul Clement, solicitor general under George W. Bush, is representing WilmerHale in its lawsuit against the administration.

“It’s especially admirable of Paul Clement to be standing up for BigLaw when BigLaw didn’t have the courage to stand up for him,” conservative legal scholar Ed Whelan wrote on X.

Clement resigned from King & Spalding in 2011 after it declined to back House Republicans’ litigation over the Defense of Marriage Act and left Kirkland & Ellis in 2022 after it stopped representing clients in Second Amendment cases.

WilmerHale’s lawsuit states that it is “a core principle of our legal system that ‘one should not be penalized for merely defending or prosecuting a lawsuit.’”

“In an unprecedented assault on that bedrock principle, the President has issued multiple executive orders in recent weeks targeting law firms and their employees as an undisguised form of retaliation for representing clients and causes he disfavors or employing lawyers he dislikes,” it continues.

Hans von Spakovsky, senior legal fellow at the Heritage Foundation’s Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies, told the DCNF there is “no First Amendment right to a security clearance.”

“There is also no constitutional right to a government contract, especially when, as here, the president says that the firm engages in racial discrimination in its hiring and personnel policies, a violation of federal law,” he said.

Trump’s law firm deals are just one way the administration is taking on the legal establishment.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) Acting Chair Andrea Lucas requested information about diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) employment practices from 20 law firms in March. “No one is above the law—and certainly not the private bar,” she said in a statement.

Attorney General Pam Bondi Bondi wrote a letter to the American Bar Association (ABA) in February over diversity requirements in its accreditation standards for law schools, threatening to revoke its “privilege” as the sole accrediting body.

The DOJ restricted its attorneys on Wednesday from attending or speaking at ABA events.

“The ABA is free to litigate in support of activist causes, including by inserting itself into pending litigation as an amicus curiae,” Blanche wrote in a memo. “The Department of Justice must, consistent with the Constitution, be careful stewards of the public fisc, represent all Americans regardless of ideology or political preferences, and defend the policies chosen by America’s democratically elected leadership-as reflected in Congressionally enacted statutes and Presidential policy choices.”

The Department of Justice (DOJ) did not respond to a request for comment.

AUTHOR

Katelynn Richardson

Contributor.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Former Obama DOJ Official Leads Hundreds Of Law Firms To Oppose Trump Order Against Firm That Repped Clinton Campaign

Judge Rules Columbia Pro-Terror Jew-Hater Mahmoud Khalil Can Be Deported

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

VIDEO: The day President Trump finally got told the truth about Operation Warp Speed thumbnail

VIDEO: The day President Trump finally got told the truth about Operation Warp Speed

By Leo Hohmann

Country music star John Rich told President Donald Trump that the reason his supporters booed him at his rallies during his 2024 bid for the White House was because of his constant bragging about Operation Warp Speed, Trump’s controversial COVID-19 program that led to the deaths and injuries of millions of Americans.

Rich explained to the hosts of the Try That In a Small Town Podcast that he was at a dinner with Trump and other high-ranking Republican politicians several years ago. Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, Senator Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee, as well as then-Georgia Senate candidate Herschel Walker were also present, sitting around a table.

Knowing that Rich is a seasoned performer, Trump turned to Rich and asked for advice on how to deal with his tough crowds.

“[Trump] goes, ‘why are people booing me at my rallies when I bring up the vaccine?’” Rich said.

Before sharing his answer, Rich explained to the podcast hosts that he knew Trump was extremely proud of Operation Warp Speed so he had to collect himself before speaking directly to him.

Listen to him describe, in the video below, how the conversation went down from there. It really is quite stunning.

WATCH: The day President Trump finally got told the truth about Operation Warp Speed

It took a country music singer for God to get through to Donald Trump about the evils of his horrifying “miracle vaccine.”

God bless John Rich. One of the few, maybe the only one, who had the guts to tell the truth about Warp Speed to the President of the United States of America, the man who triggered it all.

And Trump seems to have listened. You don’t hear him bragging about Warp Speed like he used to do constantly at every opportunity.

I also love how Rich put the corrupt globalist Senator Lindsey Graham in his place after Graham accused Rich of being a “conspiracy theorist.” Graham is a scourge on this country, an embarrassment and a pathetic excuse for a leader. If he is legitimately elected every six years, then shame on the people of South Carolina.

Sad to say, Trump still has not learned from Rich on what to make of Graham, as Trump recently gave Graham a ringing endorsement for his 2026 Senate re-election campaign.

If Trump really is an anti-globalist and against forever wars, he should be able to recognize a died-in-the-wool globalist like Lindsey Graham. It’s really not that difficult.

©2025 All rights reserved.


Please visit LeoHohmann.com: Investigative reporting on globalism, Christianity, Islam, Judaism and where politics, culture and religion intersect.

Government and medical establishment continue to poison our children with mercury and then lie about it to parents thumbnail

Government and medical establishment continue to poison our children with mercury and then lie about it to parents

By Leo Hohmann

Thimerosal, an ingredient in several childhood vaccines, is linked to autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders. 

The U.S. government has for years been telling parents that a mercury-based vaccine preservative called thimerosal poses no harm to children but that, out of an abundance of caution, the ingredient hasn’t been included in childhood vaccines since at least 2001.

The Defender reports that, according to an investigation by independent journalist Sharyl Attkisson, both these claims are now proven false.

Attkisson described them as part of “a concerted propaganda campaign to mislead the public” about thimerosal and the science linking it to autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders.

Attkisson’s investigation highlights how government agencies, along with the mainstream medical and media establishment, colluded for decades to promote a false narrative about the toxic chemical.

On the one hand, they misled the public about its known and possible harms and actively worked to discredit anyone who questioned its safety. On the other hand, they falsely assured the public that it had been removed from vaccines. Anyone who stated otherwise was branded a conspiracy theorist.

The fact is, thimerosal is still used today in some vaccines, Attkisson said, including some that are advertised as “thimerosol free.”

Her report shows that evidence linking the chemical to neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism, has existed for decades. It also shines a light on the purposeful agenda to rewrite the scientific narrative around the devastating neurotoxin to hide that link from the public.

Websites for the CDC, the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, a key source for vaccine-industry propaganda promoted by Google and an army of bought-and-paid-for “fact checkers,” have long posted statements leading the public to believe thimerosal had been removed years ago from children’s vaccines.

For example, the CDC still has false statements like this on its website: “Fact: Thimerosal was taken out of childhood vaccines in the United States in 2001.”

Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia states on its website that thimerosal “was removed from vaccines after an amendment to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Modernization Act was signed into law on Nov. 21, 1997.”

“These claims would receive five outrageous Pinocchios from any neutral fact-checking organization,” Attkisson wrote.

Attkisson shows a series of screenshots from websites and vaccine labels, many removed from the internet but archived on the Wayback Machine, from 199920012004, 2005, 2009201020182019202120222024, and 2025.

The screenshots all show thimerosal as an ingredient in vaccines available to children in the U.S., including in flu shots and some tetanus shots.

There can only be one reason why a government lies to its people in an effort to harm its children. They want a dumbed-down, mentally stunted, weak and passive population. And if that’s what they want, you have to ask yourself, why? Whose interests are served by dumbed-down, weak and passive population? I’ll let you be the judge of that.

©2025 . All rights reserved.


Please visit Leo’s Newsletter substack.

10 Beautiful Bills for a Better America thumbnail

10 Beautiful Bills for a Better America

By Family Research Council

As Congress debates major issues regarding taxes, tariffs, and trade, it would be heartening for faith, family, and freedom Americans if it found time to pass topical bills that address other pressing concerns such as protecting unborn life, dismantling taxpayer-funded abortion, conscience protections, and more.

A number of these measures have been introduced in diverse forms in past Congresses indisposed to adopt them. Others are ideas whose time had not yet come. But in these still-early days of the 119th Congress, the two chambers of Congress, one of which had time for Senator Cory Booker’s (D-N.J.) around-the-clock oration, might well find room on their schedules to debate measures that accommodate conscience, support mothers and families, and protect an underappreciated national responsibility — the collection and analysis of social metrics.

Here are 10 measures that fit this general description, with the acknowledgement that they are only a sample of proposals that are within striking distance of adoption and worthy of congressional attention even in a crowded calendar.

Hawley Child Tax Credit Expansion

Senator Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) champions an expansion of the child tax credit, a longtime bipartisan proposition, to $5,000 from its current value of $2,000 per child. The credit would reportedly be refundable against payroll taxes, be available during the year in which the child was conceived, and be paid out over the course of the year rather than remitted as a lump sum at tax time.

S. 4524, Lankford Conscience Protection Act of 2024

Reintroduced most recently in June 2024, legislation like this is urgently needed in an environment where existing federal conscience protections languished unenforced in the Biden years, and states like Illinois and Washington are moving to require physicians or pregnancy centers to refer for abortions against their convictions that these actions are morally and ethically wrong. S. 4524 would have reinforced several existing federal conscience laws and grant individuals and institutions a private right of action to assert their conscience claims in federal court. The proposed law would clarify that the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) must investigate alleged conscience violations and can suspend federal funds for health-related services if the violators do not respect conscience.

H.R. 796, Miller Second Chance for Moms Act

Introduced on January 28, 2025 by Rep. Mary Miller (R-Ill.), this legislation would amend the basic federal food, drug, and cosmetics legislation to require the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to mandate a warning label be placed on the abortion drug mifepristone. The warning label would advise women of the availability of an abortion pill reversal (APR) protocol that can often rescue their baby after the woman has taken the drug. It would require the secretary of HHS to create or contract with a 24/7, toll-free hotline to advise women on how to access abortion pill reversal with referrals limited solely to providers of APR.

H.R. 7, Smith No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2025

Introduced on January 22, 2025, Rep. Christopher Smith’s (R-N.J.) bill is an expanded version of previous anti-funding measures and now has 81 House of Representatives co-sponsors. The bill would make permanent the terms of the Hyde Amendment, which permits funding of abortion only in cases of rape, incest, or where a physical disorder, injury, or illness would threaten a woman’s life. It would apply to the full sweep of Hyde Amendment provisions applicable now to annual spending bills. H.R. 7 would also bar federal subsidies for the portion of health insurance premiums that pay for abortion coverage.

H.R. 271 and 272, Fischbach Defund Planned Parenthood and Protecting Life and Taxpayers Acts

These measures, introduced on January 14, 2025, would prohibit Planned Parenthood from accessing any discretionary or mandatory federal funds because of its immersion in the provision and promotion of abortion. The Protecting Life Act would require all federally-funded entities to certify that they will not carry out abortions or provide funds to any other entity that carries out abortions beyond the terms permitted by the Hyde Amendment. The Senate version of the Defund Planned Parenthood Act, S. 203, was introduced on January 23, 2025 by Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and has 11 co-sponsors. In addition, a coalition of 150 pro-life groups has called on Congress to cut funding for Planned Parenthood in the upcoming budget reconciliation bill.

S. 334, Risch American Values Act

This bill carries forward pro-life foreign assistance policy. Introduced on January 30, 2025 by Senator James Risch (R-Idaho), the bill would amend the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 to ensure that no appropriated funds may be used to pay for abortion as a method of family planning or to motivate or coerce any person to be sterilized. The bill would also bar the use of funds to pay for biomedical research related to techniques of induced abortion or coerced sterilization. The bill has a dozen co-sponsors.

H.R. 627/S. 178, Norman-Ernst Ensuring Accurate and Complete Abortion Data Reporting Act of 2025

Introduced by Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.) on the House side and Senator Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) in the Senate, this is a critical piece of legislation that will ensure the demographic and some health implications of induced abortion are tracked and analyzable to the extent possible in a national, public framework. The urgency of this legislation, which would redress a half century of voluntary and incomplete national reporting, is all the greater thanks to the rapid expansion of chemical abortion conducted with little to no medical evaluation or supervision. The bill notes the disturbing facts that not a single data point regarding abortion is publicly available for all 50 states, and that three states, constituting 15% of U.S. abortion volume, share no reports at all with the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC).

H.R. 578, Roy FACE Act Repeal Act of 2025

Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) has led the fight against the much-abused Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act, a law that was weaponized during the Biden administration to target right-to-life demonstrators with vindictive prosecutions and harsh penalties. President Trump, as one of his initial executive actions, pardoned men and women, including grandmothers, who had been sentenced to lengthy prison terms for engaging in protests, while making little or no progress in identifying or prosecuting individuals who attacked churches and pregnancy help centers. Absent repeal of this legislation, Roy says, biased enforcement will promptly resume in a future administration. “Data my office obtained from Merrick Garland’s DOJ showed that 97% of FACE Act prosecutions from 1994-2024 were against pro-life Americans.”

H.R. 722, Burlison, Life at Conception Act

The United States has seen a recent spike in abortions, beginning before the 2022 Dobbs ruling but continuing in its wake, with one source reporting that our nation’s abortion toll has risen to more than one million abortions per year. As Congress and the states look for ways to support mothers, the fact remains that for much of the country, the legal status of the unborn is a void that must be filled. It is lawful in much of the land to dismember a child in the womb; to destroy a child in the third trimester or a human embryo because it is affected by Down syndrome or is not the preferred sex; to set aside a child born alive and deny him or her life-saving care; to use public funds to pay for and promote abortion; to leave a woman alone in a bathroom to expel the new life from her womb; or to ship abortion drugs across state lines with little or no medical support.

To address these wrongs, legislation is needed that not only delivers unprecedented levels of support for men and women to act for the good of their child, but to safeguard each and every innocent life. The Life at Conception Act, with 73 co-sponsors, faces a steep challenge in this Congress but it too would be a beautiful bill, one with the added virtue of honoring our best hope for a better future for America.

AUTHOR

Chuck Donovan

Chuck Donovan served in the Reagan White House as a senior writer and as Deputy Director of Presidential Correspondence until early 1989. He was executive vice president of Family Research Council, a senior fellow at The Heritage Foundation, and founder/president of Charlotte Lozier Institute from 2011 to 2024. He has written and spoken extensively on issues in life and family policy.

RELATED VIDEO: Let Trump Be Trump! The President is Attempting the Near Impossible!

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2025 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

We Win, They Lose thumbnail

We Win, They Lose

By Kenneth R. Timmerman

Ronald Reagan was asked by one of his advisors early on in his presidency to outline his strategy toward the Cold War with the Soviet Union.

It’s simple, he replied. “We win, they lose.”

That is also Donald Trump’s strategy when it comes to Communist China.

During the early days of Covid, the Chinese publicly floated the idea of cutting off the supply of pharmaceutical precursors to the United States, knowing full well that such an action could cost millions of American lives. And they did that when our two nations were at peace.

Imagine for an instant if, God forbid, the United States and China were engaged in a shooting war over Taiwan. It wouldn’t be just pharmaceuticals they would cut off, but the computer chips that guide our smart munitions, the strategic minerals we use in our bombs, and much more.

Through laziness and greed, we have become utterly dependent on Communist China to supply us with basic necessities at a lower cost than we can produce them in the United States. As I wrote in this space last week, Donald Trump saw that vulnerability, and is seeking to correct it through tariffs.

And guess what? Trump actually holds all the good cards. China’s $300 billion annual trade surplus with the United States is vital to the Chinese economy. Chinese business publications this week were full of stories of the catastrophic effect of the new US tariffs on their exports.

Even the lithium battery industry, which the Chinese dominate world wide, would be decimated. Trump’s new tariffs “will lead to a significant decline in the price competitiveness of China’s lithium power battery products in the US, shrinking profits for export enterprises, and forcing some companies to accelerate the adjustment of their overseas market strategies,” one such publication conservatively projected.

Without the US market, Chinese auto-parts manufacturers will close factories. Apple will accelerate the construction of its new iPhone and iPad factories in the United States. Millions of Chinese workers will find themselves out of work.

And then? The prospect of major economic hardship, brought about by the actions of Chinese President Xi, will enrage other Chinese leaders, not just the population. President Xi’s days could very well be numbered.

The administration is engaged in two other sets of negotiations at the same time the tariff and trade deals are hatching. And the same person, Steve Witcoff, is leading both.

On Friday, Witcoff flew off to Saint Petersburg, Russia, for previously unannounced talks with Putin. It was the third time the two have met.

President Trump has expressed frustration at what he sees as Putin’s obstinate refusal to agree to a ceasefire, and so Witcoff came armed with a menu of potential US actions aimed at making Putin more amenable to ending the killing.

But there is a Ukraine wildcard in the negotiation as well, and it’s a killer — literally.

The Department of Justice filed a motion this week in the case against Ryan Routh, alleging that Trump’s would-be assassin had contacted someone in Ukraine asking to buy a Stinger or an RPG, in order to take down Donald Trump’s campaign jet. “[Trump] is not good for Ukraine,” Routh texted his correspondent on an encrypted messaging app.

Prosecutors did not name the Ukrainian, or indicate whether he was at all connected to the Ukrainian government. What if he was just a private citizen Routh had met while in Ukraine in 2022 but Ukrainian intelligence got wind of the plot and declined to inform the United States? The implications of this new information go way beyond the Russia-Ukraine negotiations.

From St. Petersburg, Witcoff flies to Oman for negotiations with Iran’s foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi. Trump said publicly during his Oval Office meeting with visiting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that the two would hold “direct” talks.

The Iranians said, no, they would talk through intermediaries.

That is the first red flag.

Witcoff recently admitted that he got “duped” by Hamas during negotiations in Qatar with Hamas-appointed Arab mediators over the latest hostage release.

Having worked in the Middle East as a war correspondent and investigative reporter for forty years, let me say this straight: if Arab negotiators managed to dupe Mr. Witcoff, the Iranians are going to take him to the cleaners.

Rule #1 in negotiating with the Iranians: always be prepared to walk out. 

The Iranians invariably win at negotiations because the other party wants the deal more than they do. That’s what happened to John Kerry when he “negotiated” the Iran nuclear deal in 2015. Three times he thought he had a deal, and three times his Iranian counterpart agreed.

But, he added, just let me fly back over the weekend to Tehran to run it by the Supreme Leader.

Each time, the Ayatollah — surely laughing like a magpie at Kerry’s idiocy — upped the ante with new and increasingly outrageous demands. And each time, Kerry agreed.

The Iranians love to talk about the size and shape of the table. And the participants. And the intermediaries. Mr. Witcoff must make clear that neither he nor the president finds their games amusing.

They get one shot at this. If they keep their foreign minister in an adjacent suite while the Omanis transmit messages back and forth, Mr. Witcoff should walk out. If they want negotiations to continue, they can crawl back.

And remember this: these negotiations are not about returning to the 2015 nuclear deal, which Trump has called the “worst deal ever negotiated.” They are about dismantling Iran’s nuclear weapons infrastructure.

Mr. Witcoff must understand that and hold firm. The Iranians will squeal. They will complain. They will accuse us of behaving like a hegemon, depriving them of their “rights” to conduct nuclear research.

Let them. Because if they do not agree to Mr. Trump’s terms they won’t be squealing at all, at least, not for long.

There are now six B-2 “Spirit” stealth bombers stationed on Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean with 30,000 bunker-busting bombs with the names of buried Iranian nuclear plants on them.

That’s called, holding all the cards.

I discuss this, and the blowback of the Russia-China-North Korea-Iran axis, in this week’s Prophecy Today Weekend. As always, you can listen live at 1 PM on Saturday on 104.9 FM or 550 AM, or by using the Jacksonville Way Radio app. If you miss us live, tune into the podcast here.

Yours in freedom.

©2025 . All rights reserved.


Ken Timmerman’s 14th book of non-fiction, THE IRAN HOUSE: Tales of Revolution, Persecution, War, and Intrigue, can be ordered by clicking here or by viewing my author’s page, here. 

Raising Olives in Provence, can be ordered by clicking here.

Honorable Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton you have my unwavering support of your campaign for the U.S. Senate thumbnail

Honorable Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton you have my unwavering support of your campaign for the U.S. Senate

By Amil Imani

Hon. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton,

On behalf of the fiercely loyal Texas voters who have elected you three times—drawn to your unblemished record, relentless service, and ironclad conservative principles—I extend my heartfelt congratulations and unwavering support as you launch your campaign for the U.S. Senate. Texas doesn’t just need another senator; we need a warrior, and you, General Paxton, are the most qualified leader to answer that call.

Your career is a testament to honor, courage, and an unshakable commitment to the Lone Star State. It takes guts to confront our enemies—whether they’re radical leftists or spineless so-called “allies” within our own ranks. You’ve repeatedly proven that you’ll fight for what’s right, no matter who comes at you. We’ve seen this alongside Senator Ted Cruz and President Trump, both battered by the Deep State for daring to defy the swamp. You’ve stood tall with them, fearlessly confronting Biden’s tyrannical abuse of power and the illegal imposition of same-sex marriage against the will of Texans.

Politics is a brutal game, and your enemies—emboldened by jealousy and desperation—would love nothing more than to see you torn apart. Yet, your tireless campaign and crystal-clear vision have rallied the electorate around you. Texans know you’re not just the best person for the Attorney General’s office—you’re the only one we can trust to combat Washington’s corruption as our next senator. We will not let you face this defining battle alone.

America is under siege, not just from foreign threats but from a calculated, treasonous takeover within our own borders. The public is being manipulated through market rigging, monopolistic mergers, and the suffocating grip of Big Tech’s information cartels. This isn’t just greed—it’s sedition. You’ve already demonstrated your resolve by wielding antitrust laws to dismantle these schemes and protect our sovereignty. Texas needs that same ferocity in the Senate.

General Paxton, your legacy is forged in the fire of conservative conviction. You’ve addressed voter fraud head-on when others cowered, shielded Texas from the federal government’s suffocating overreach, and defended the bedrock of our Republic against all odds. Meanwhile, John Cornyn—our current senator—has proven himself utterly ineffective. He’s a globalist sellout who’s spent years idly watching, doing nothing for Texas while cozying up to the D.C. elite. Cornyn has failed us miserably, and it’s time to send him packing.

As President Trump has warned, “They’re not after me; they’re after you. I’m just in the way.” The same applies to you, General Paxton. The radical Democrats and their RINO enablers fear you because you stand in their path. Texas demands a senator who will fight, not fold—and John Cornyn has folded every chance he’s had.

I wish you strength and victory on this critical journey to defend America, our Constitution, and the values that make Texas great. You’re not just running to replace Cornyn—you’re running to bury his failed tenure and restore authentic leadership to the Senate. Texans stand with you, ready to unseat that ineffective relic and send our strongest conservative champion to Washington.

Sincerely,

Amil Imani

©2025 . All rights reserved.

Where Are The Anti-War Movements Hiding When You Need Them? thumbnail

Where Are The Anti-War Movements Hiding When You Need Them?

By Leo Hohmann

As the nations hurdle toward WWIII, we’ve seen very little backlash to date. 

The Daily Mail reports that Germany’s Interior Ministry has called for civil-defense training in schools and is urging citizens to stockpile food, water and essentials in response to the deteriorating security situation in Europe and a growing threat of World War III.

The unprecedented move would see German schoolchildren taught how to respond in volatile war-like scenarios.

A ministry spokesman said civil protection “should be given greater focus, including in schools,” given the recent geopolitical developments and expert testimonies that Russia could be ready to strike NATO territory within a few years.

Sounds like the ministry is listening to the wrong experts.

What The Daily Mail article does NOT say is that the chances of Russia launching a military strike on NATO countries would be zero if NATO would stop provoking Putin by funding a massive military buildup on Putin’s border with Ukraine.

A defense spokesman for Germany’s “conservative” CDU party is calling for mandatory basic training in disaster response, modeled on systems in Finland, which has been preparing citizens for the possibility of a war with Putin‘s Russia for years. Finland is another country that has largely consumed the intoxicating wine of anti-Russian warmongers. It’s leaders couldn’t wait to join NATO and invite Western troops on their border with Russia, which actually makes the citizens of Finland LESS SAFE than if Finland had remained neutral.

The Daily Mail said Berlin “stands ready to provide all schools and teachers with national crisis materials via the Federal Office of Civil Protection and Disaster Assistance.”

The German defense ministry also approved a new EU Commission initiative on wartime readiness, and recommended that all German citizens prepare emergency supplies to last at least 72 hours as recommended by the European Union.

Governments have given similar instructions to their citizens in France, England, Sweden, Poland and other European countries.

All of Western Europe is lining up behind the war mongers. It won’t be long before this thing kicks off. And 72 hours worth of supplies aren’t going to cut it.

Pray for peace. Prepare for war. Our leaders want it. Whether we do or not.

And just because Donald Trump is in office doesn’t mean it’s safe to join the U.S. military. The government’s recruitment efforts have started yielding much better results since Trump returned to the White House. This was one of the major reasons the globalists allowed Trump to win in 2024, so they could re-populate the U.S. military with actual war fighters. They know that war is on the agenda, likely in 2025, and they need it to last long enough to wipe out a generation of young people as part of their continuing depopulation scheme.

President Donald Trump’s massive trade tariffs are not in and of themselves a bad thing. This needed to be done decades ago to preserve the livelihoods of the American workers and the economic fortunes of the middle class. My concern is that Trump is doing the right thing but in the wrong way. He’s trying to do too much too fast, sending the world into a state of economic shock that will only speed up the rush to war. Economic war always precedes kinetic war.

I keep waiting for a serious, sustained backlash from the anti-war crowd to materialize. Where are they hiding? What are they waiting for to come out and make themselves seen and heard? Perhaps they are already trying but get no media coverage? Perhaps the general public is not aware of just how close we are to World War III, and how quickly such a conflict could go nuclear? Are they deceived into thinking “Trump’s got this, not to worry?”

Share your thoughts in the comments below.

©2025 . All rights reserved.


Please visit Leo’s Newsletter substack.