Kevin Warsh’s Collision Course with Congress Intensifies: A Briefing

By The Editors


nginx

What Happened to Virginia’s Congressional Map and What’s Next? A Briefing

By The Editors


nginx

Strong Earnings & Economy Battle Geopolitics and Hawkish Fed

By Kenny Polcari


nginx

Orbán’s Defeat in Hungary Exposes Rifts on the American Right

By Jeremy Carl


nginx

A Playbook for Mass Deportations

By Kyle Brosnan


nginx

Iran’s Last Remaining Weapon

By Mark Wallace


nginx

The Purpose and Future of Artemis Deep Space Missions: A Briefing

By The Editors


nginx

The Echoes of 1775 at Lexington: Why the “Shot” Still Rings Today

By Catherine Salgado


nginx

The Ebbing Support for NATO- A Shifting State of Play

By Neland Nobel


nginx

Trump Admin To Stop Taxpayer Funding Of Worthless College Degrees

By Breccan F. Thies


nginx

How are Retail Investors Approaching Current Volatility?

By Kenny Polcari


nginx

Iran Delenda Est?

By Mark Wallace


nginx

Progressive Taxes May Discourage the Most Productive Work

By Jason Sorens


nginx

Gun Control is About Control: How We Know

By The Editors

Estimated Reading Time: 2 minutes

ANALYSIS

While the elite talk about “public safety” after each tragic shooting, the data shows they are ignoring several practical options for the comfort of focusing solely on disarming the law-abiding.

While the media fixates on tragedy, they ignore that Americans use firearms for self-defense between 500,000 and 3 million times annually, proving that a “good guy with a gun” isn’t a myth—it’s a massive, uncounted insurance policy for civil order.

The Mental Health Margin: Despite “gun control” dominating the airwaves, the federal government allocated only about $1.1 billion toward school-based mental health in the latest major safety act—a drop in the bucket compared to the $557 billion in total societal costs they claim gun violence incurs, yet they refuse to pivot the budget toward the root cause.

The FBI’s 2024 data confirms that while total violent crime dropped 4.5%, the push for “assault weapon” bans targets a category of firearms used in less than 3% of all homicides, proving the legislative crosshairs are on your collection, not the criminal’s toolkit.

94% of mass public shootings since 1950 have occurred in “gun-free zones,” where the state’s promise of protection is most absolute and its failure most total.

The Warning Sign Gap: A staggering 93% of mass shooters showed observable warning signs or “signs of crisis” prior to their attacks, yet the legislative focus remains on the tool rather than the intervention of the person—proving that the “mental health” pivot isn’t just a talking point; it’s the missing link in actual prevention.

AT WHAT COST?

The surrender of the ultimate “sovereignty of the individual” to a federal bureaucracy that has proven it cannot even secure its own border, let alone your cul-de-sac. We are trading a fundamental right for a false sense of security managed by the very people who failed to provide it.

WHAT IS THE ALTERNATIVE?

We should look toward the “Hardened School” model: treating campus security with the same $20 billion seriousness we treat airport terminals and federal courthouses. The alternative is a “Security-as-a-Service” mindset—investing in private safety infrastructure and mental health intervention rather than signing over your Second Amendment rights.

The data is clear: the push for “control” is a bad-faith strategy designed to manage your rights rather than manage the risk. If we want to secure our future, we must stop auditing the law-abiding and start hardening the targets that the “Control Cartel” has left undefended.

“To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.” – George Mason

-The Editors

Energy Reliability Is Only As Strong As Its Weakest Wire

By Grant Stark

Estimated Reading Time: 3 minutes

TPP Editors’ Takes

  • Generation capacity is useless if the distribution network remains vulnerable, as proven by the 23 lives lost and 230,000 outages during Winter Storm Fern.
  • While power plants remained operational, the “last mile” of poles and wires failed because the Nashville Electric Service cut its tree-trimming budget by one-third despite auditor warnings.
  • Ending utility monopolies on maintenance and opening grid hardening—such as burying lines and clearing brush—to private contractors would lower costs and speed up repairs.
  • Implementing “smart grid” technologies like automated switching can detect breaks and reroute power in seconds, potentially cutting outage durations by 50%.

Adding more generation capacity without hardening the last-mile delivery network leaves the cake half-baked.

This past January, Tennesseans received a chilling reminder of how electrical power actually works… and where it fails. Winter Storm Fern blanketed Middle Tennessee with heavy ice, tree branches buckled, power lines snapped, and a peak of 230,000 households were left without power in freezing temperatures. Statewide, 23 Tennesseans lost their lives due to the storm, and for many families, power didn’t return for nearly two weeks. While power plants were operating during the storm, the “distribution grid,” the network of poles, wires, and equipment to move the power from plants to homes, was the failure point that led to the outages.

Before the storm even hit, Nashville Electric Service (NES) had cut its tree-trimming budget by one-third—even though its own internal auditors had warned that untrimmed branches hanging over power lines would make outages significantly worse. Trees were the culprit on nearly every street. Despite operational power plants, Tennessee being home to the first small modular nuclear reactor breaking ground in Oak Ridge, and TVA partnerships to bring additional alternative energy capacity to communities across the state, none of that matters if the last mile of energy transmission fails, and this is what we experienced with Winter Storm Fern. A single-family home, a data center, a manufacturer, a hospital—they don’t care where the power comes from. They care whether it shows up reliably. As we stand, too much of Tennessee’s distribution grid is one bad ice storm away from the same crisis Nashville just experienced.

The good news is that there are well-known solutions to reduce the risks. Between new technologies that are already in use across neighboring states and more efficient maintenance and upgrade programs, Tennessee can right the ship by implementing a few tangible policy changes:

Open the maintenance work to real competition. Much of the labor-intensive maintenance work required to keep the grid in good shape, including burying vulnerable lines, clearing vegetation, and upgrading aging equipment, doesn’t require a utility monopoly to do it. Private contractors across Tennessee are ready, skilled, and capable. When utilities are required to competitively bid this work rather than self-perform or lock in preferred vendors, costs tend to come down, the work gets done faster, and ratepayers benefit.

Let the market reward resilient technology. Modern grid systems can detect exactly where a problem is and reroute power around it, sometimes within seconds, without waiting for a crew to drive out and find the break. The US Department of Energy has found these smart grid technologies can cut outage durations by nearly half.

Capitalize on the recent momentum with changes to state law. Legislation filed in the wake of the storm would require utilities serving more than 10,000 customers to publish an annual grid reliability report, a 10-year resilience plan, and a vegetation management strategy with real trimming cycles and oversight standards. That’s a strong foundation, but reporting alone doesn’t harden a single line. By directing investment toward the highest-risk corridors first, prioritizing proven hardening technologies like automated switching and targeted undergrounding, and drawing down every available federal grid resilience dollar already allocated through the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, the state will be better prepared for future storms.

The Volunteer State is building a serious energy future that will continue to anchor our leadership in the sector. But adding more generation capacity without hardening the last-mile delivery network leaves the cake half-baked. Allowing competition and technology to improve our state’s grid will not only make the state more attractive for investment but also keep more Tennesseans safe when it matters most.

-Grant Stark

Grant Stark serves as the Chief Executive Officer for American Grid Partners, a national portfolio of skilled legacy contractors dedicated to repairing and modernizing America’s power, water, and communication infrastructure.

This piece was reproduced with the permission of Foundation for Economic Education. Any opinions articulated herein are those of the author, not The Prickly Pear. For the original piece, please visit HERE.

A Quarter Century of Continued Union Decline: 2000 to 2025

By Rachel Greszler


nginx

When Hitler Was a Moral Compass

By John Pinheiro


nginx