Minneapolis Mayhem, ICE Updates, and More

By Family Research Council

President Donald Trump’s immigration enforcement agenda has arrested headlines for over a year, but violent riots and a series of fatal shootings have intensified scrutiny over immigration raids in Minneapolis. Earlier this month, 37-year-old Renee Good was shot and killed by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent when she struck the agent with her vehicle after impeding enforcement operations. Just last week, 37-year-old Alex Pretti was shot and killed by U.S. Border Patrol (USBP) agents when he showed up armed to protest immigration enforcement operations and involved himself in a physical altercation with law enforcement. Subsequently, the president deployed Border Czar and former ICE chief Tom Homan to Minneapolis to take control of operations. Here are the latest updates.

‘Noem, Go Home?’

In the wake of the violence in Minneapolis, multiple Democratic legislators have called for Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to resign, threatening to impeach her if she does not leave of her own volition. Now, Republicans are joining Democrats in clamoring for Noem’s ouster. According to Fox News, frequent Trump critics Senators Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) have joined Democrats in calling on the president to fire Noem. “I think the President needs to look at who he has in place as the Secretary of Homeland Security. I would not support her again,” Murkowski said, referring to her vote to confirm Noem, “and I think it probably is time for her to step down.”

Tillis faulted Noem and, more broadly, the Trump administration, especially White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy and Homeland Security Advisor Stephen Miller, for stalling a partly-bipartisan amnesty push for illegal immigrants. “I don’t know if it’s lost yet, but if it is an opportunity lost, I put it squarely on the shoulders of people like Noem and Stephen Miller,” Tillis said. Referring to the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS’s) handling of Pretti’s death, he added, “Those two people told the president, before they even had any incident report whatsoever, that the person who died was a terrorist. I mean, that is amateur hour at its worst.”

Following Pretti’s death, Noem referred to him as a “domestic terrorist” and official DHS channels, citing the handgun and multiple magazines Pretti brought with him when interfering with federal law enforcement, claimed that he sought to “massacre” federal agents. The characterization has been criticized as premature and has reportedly inspired some frustration within DHS’s ranks, particularly among ICE agents, who fear that they are being blamed for some of the more aggressive riot control tactics used by USBP.

The president has asserted that he will not ask Noem to resign, but he did reportedly question his Homeland Security Secretary in a two-hour Oval Office meeting Tuesday. According to The New York Times, Noem and her top advisor, former Trump campaign official Corey Lewandowski, met with the president, who was joined by White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, Communications Director Steven Cheung, and Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, to discuss the optics surrounding Pretti’s death and Noem’s response. The New York Times reported that no indication was given that either Noem or Lewandowski was at risk of losing their jobs.

Notably absent from the Oval Office meeting was Miller, the chief architect of Trump’s immigration policy over the past decade and one of the president’s closest and longest-serving allies. According to Axios, Noem faults Miller for DHS’s response to Pretti’s death, with the Homeland Security Secretary saying that Miller told her to label Pretti a domestic terrorist and a threat to federal law enforcement personnel. “Everything I’ve done, I’ve done at the direction of the president and Stephen,” Axios quoted Noem as saying. Unnamed sources reported that Miller “heard ‘gun’ and knew what the narrative would be: Pretti came to ‘massacre’ cops,” but that the USBP agents involved in the shooting were quick to shut up and lawyer up, impeding the White House’s fact-finding in the matter.

However, other sources faulted USBP Commander-at-Large Gregory Bovino for the miscommunication. “Bovino should be blamed,” one unnamed source told Axios, “not Stephen.” According to Miller and several other sources, Bovino and USBP quickly relayed potentially incorrect or incomplete information immediately following Pretti’s death, resulting in DHS’s controversial messaging. “The initial statement from DHS was based on reports from CBP on the ground,” Miller told the New York Post. “Additionally, the White House provided clear guidance to DHS that the extra personnel that had been sent to Minnesota for force protection should be used for conducting fugitive operations to create a physical barrier between the arrest teams and the disruptors,” he noted. “We are evaluating why the CBP team may not have been following that protocol.”

Not a Pretti Picture

More information is emerging surrounding the controversial shooting of Pretti. A preliminary DHS review of the incident found that Pretti and another rioter were physically obstructing federal agents, despite being told multiple times to move out of the way. Pretti resisted arrest and struggled with USBP agents, when one agent shouted that Pretti had a gun, a loaded Sig Sauer handgun. Shortly afterwards, at least two federal agents began firing at Pretti, discharging roughly a dozen times. It was not until after Pretti had been shot that another agent announced that he had taken Pretti’s weapon from him. USBP’s Office of Professional Responsibility Investigative Operations Directorate also confirmed that the agents involved were wearing bodycams and that footage has been collected.

While many have touted Pretti’s credentials as a Veterans Affairs nurse, CNN reported that Pretti was already “known” to federal agents due to interfering in previous operations, including a physical altercation in which his rib was broken, just a week before he continued inserting himself into law enforcement operations and was killed. According to a Fox News report, Pretti was a member of an anti-ICE organization that used complex communications and tracking networks to plan obstructions to law enforcement operations. Pretti and others were already waiting for federal agents at the site where Pretti was killed. Pretti’s ex-wife confirmed that he had also been involved in the violent riots that rocked Minneapolis in 2020, following the death of George Floyd.

The president has committed to a thorough investigation of the events surrounding Pretti’s death. “We’re doing a big investigation. I want to see the investigation. I’m going to be watching over it. I want to see it myself,” he told reporters Tuesday. “I love all of our people. I love his family, and it’s a very sad situation,” he continued, advising anti-ICE activists not to bring guns to confrontations with federal law enforcement.

Lives on the Line

Pretti’s armed altercation with federal law enforcement agents and subsequent death comes in the midst of increased violence and threats against ICE personnel and other federal agents. According to a Breitbart News analysis, recent months have seen an 8,000% increase in death threats against ICE agents, including threats against their families, and a 1,300% increase in violent assaults against ICE agents. Breitbart quoted a voice message left on an agent’s phone as an example of the threats made against law enforcement personnel:

“I hope your wife dies. I hope your mom and dad die. I hope everything wrong that could go in your life happens. I hope you have the most miserable life. I hope you get hit by a bus. I hope you’re paralyzed, and your wife leaves you, and starts getting [expletive] by [other men] every day. You are a traitor to the American people, to the values that made our country. You should kill yourself. You’re [expletive] disgusting.”

According to the Washington Examiner, DHS is currently investigating the case of a woman who attempted multiple times to purchase firearms “to protect herself from ICE Agents, and also to kill ICE Agents.” In another instance, Virginia Commonwealth University fired a nurse for a series of social media posts advising anti-ICE activists to use paralytic drugs and poison ivy brews against ICE agents and encouraging single women to use dating apps to meet ICE agents and then poison their drinks.

DHS Assistant Secretary for Communications Tricia McLaughlin partly faulted Democrats for the rise in hostility, citing the dehumanizing rhetoric they use against federal law enforcement officers. “Comparing ICE day in and day out to the Nazi Gestapo, the Secret Police, and slave patrols has consequences,” she warned. “Every day there are more assaults, more vehicle-ramming attacks, more attempts to kill our officers.”

Twin Cities Stalemate?

After having been deployed to Minneapolis this week, Homan has already begun negotiating with Minnesota Governor Tim Walz (D) and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey (D) to ensure that immigration enforcement operations can continue with as little conflict as possible, pressuring the two Democrats to end their “sanctuary” policies and cooperate with ICE. “We all agree that we need to support our law enforcement officers and get criminals off the streets. While we don’t agree on everything, these meetings were a productive starting point and I look forward to more conversations with key stakeholders in the days ahead,” Homan reported Tuesday evening of his meetings with Walz and Frey. “President Trump has been clear: he wants American cities to be safe and secure for law-abiding residents — and they will be.”

Walz is evidently considering cooperating with the Trump administration, much to the outrage of his constituents. Anti-ICE activists stormed the Minnesota state capitol building Tuesday and staged a mass protest outside Walz’s office, chanting slogans such as, “ICE out now!” and “Do your job!” The governor had met with Homan Tuesday afternoon and had spoken with Trump previously, in what the president characterized as “productive.” He later quipped, “It couldn’t have been a nicer conversation. It’s hard to believe that’s the same guy I watch on TV or the debate not doing so well, because we had a reasonable and good conversation. If you believe it, he’d like to get this over with!”

In an interview following his meeting with Homan, Walz classified the Border Czar as “a professional,” which he said was not his experience of Noem and Bovino. “The tone was different, there was a tone shift,” he said of his talk with the Trump immigration official. While insisting that he would still like to see ICE leave Minnesota altogether, Walz admitted, “It was progress. Look, I never got a call from Bovino or Noem, nothing.” However, the governor still faulted federal operations for unrest in Minneapolis, rather than his own actions and rhetoric. “They started this fire.”

Frey also spoke with Homan, but has continued to reject the administration’s requests to end “sanctuary” policies. “Surprisingly, Mayor Jacob Frey just stated that, ‘Minneapolis does not, and will not, enforce Federal Immigration Laws,’” the president reported in a Truth Social post Wednesday morning. “This is after having had a very good conversation with him. Could somebody in his inner sanctum please explain that this statement is a very serious violation of the Law, and that he is PLAYING WITH FIRE!”

Appearing on “Washington Watch” Tuesday night, Rep. Andy Harris (R-Md.) stressed the damage done by Democrats’ anti-law enforcement rhetoric, in addition to the importance for Republicans to follow through on the Trump administration’s immigration agenda. “All the other jurisdictions around the country where ICE is doing that job, they have cooperation from local officials, so there are no problems,” Harris observed. “The problems are when you have a governor and a mayor openly telling people in Minnesota to go against the Constitution, go against the ability of the federal government to enforce immigration law,” he continued. “You have a rogue governor and a rogue mayor, that’s the problem in Minnesota.”

“Republicans were elected to the majorities with President Trump to close the border and to begin the deportation of the 10 to 12 million people who crossed the border illegally under the Biden administration. We have to get that done,” Harris emphasized. “Unless you think that the 10 to 12 million people who came in illegally under the Biden administration should be invited to stay forever, you need ICE.”

AUTHOR

S.A. McCarthy

S.A. McCarthy serves as a news writer at The Washington Stand.

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2026 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

FBI Agents Search Election Hub in Fulton County, Georgia in Court-Authorized 2020 Vote Investigation

By The Geller Report

“FBI agents were seen Wednesday carrying out a search at an election hub in Fulton County, Georgia, a location that became ground zero for concerns and complaints about voter fraud beginning in 2020.”

FBI agents carried out a court-authorized search Wednesday at the Fulton County Election Hub in Georgia, a facility tied to longstanding controversy over the 2020 election. The FBI confirmed the action but declined to provide details, saying the investigation is ongoing and related to the 2020 vote. The search comes amid renewed scrutiny of Fulton County, which has been at the center of election disputes, recent DOJ efforts to access ballots, and the now-dismissed racketeering case brought by DA Fani Willis against President Trump and others.

“It’s not just that none of the 315,000 early votes for Fulton County, GA in 2020 were not signed.

They never turned over ANY zero tapes for those votes. That’s the entire beginning record of the election.

They provided 137 unsigned closing tapes, but ZERO signed or unsigned opening tapes.

They made the early votes up and this is what the recounts were supposed to match. (They didn’t.) It was all a fraud and they never produced the results that the second machine count and the hand recount were supposedly matching.”Liz Harrington

FBI agents search election hub in Fulton County, Georgia

Agents were seen entering the Fulton County Election Hub and Operation Center

By: Ashley Oliver, David Spunt, Fox News, January 28, 2026:

Drama unfolds over televised Georgia court hearing in election fraud case

FIRST ON FOX: FBI agents were seen Wednesday carrying out a search at an election hub in Fulton County, Georgia, a location that became ground zero for concerns and complaints about voter fraud beginning in 2020.

Agents were seen entering the Fulton County Election Hub and Operation Center, a new facility that state officials opened in 2023 that was designed to streamline their election processes.

It was not immediately clear what the FBI agents were investigating, but Fox News Digital is told the probe is related to the 2020 election.

The bureau said in a statement provided to Fox News Digital that FBI Atlanta was executing a “court authorized law enforcement action at 5600 [Campbellton] Fairburn Rd.”

“Our investigation into this matter is ongoing so there are no details that we can provide at the moment,” the bureau said.

The Department of Justice did not provide comment.

President Donald Trump lost the election in Georgia in 2020 by a wafer-thin margin and claimed various instances of fraud had tainted the results. Those claims did not survive court scrutiny. Fulton, a suburb of Atlanta and the state’s most populous county, drew significant attention at the time.

A machine count and two recounts confirmed that former President Joe Biden had won the state, leading Trump to feud with Georgia’s leaders for years.

The DOJ sued Fulton County last month seeking access to ballots related to the 2020 election.

Trump’s grievances in Georgia were compounded when he and numerous co-conspirators were indicted by a grand jury in Fulton County Superior Court in 2023 over allegations that they engaged in a racketeering scheme involving illegally attempting to overturn the 2020 election results.

The case never made it to trial as Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis was disqualified from prosecuting it. An independent entity called the Prosecuting Attorneys’ Council decided to dismiss the indictment last year, saying it would not be in the interest of the state to continue with the case…….

Continue reading.

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

RELATED ARTICLES:

Fulton County Admits 315,000 Illegal 2020 Votes Were Counted

Corrupt Fulton County DA Fani Willis and Bill Barr Worked Together on the RICO Case Targeting Donald Trump

Georgia: Fulton County Plans to Illegally Accept Ballots in Democrat-Controlled Areas

Fulton County DA Fani Willis Paid Her Lover $654,000 of Taxpayer Money since January 2022 to Act as Special Prosecutor to Get Trump

“There Actually Was Meaningful Voter Fraud in Fulton County, Georgia.”

HUGE Revelation in Fulton County in Wake of FOIA Records: Report

MADNESS: Fulton County Grand Jury Recommended Charges Against Sen. Lindsey Graham, Other GOP Senators

Radical Fulton County DA Asks for October 2023 Trial For Frontrunner Trump and All 19 of His Lawyers

House Judiciary Chairman Launches Probe Into Corrupt Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis Hours Before Trump is To Be Arrested

POSTS ON X:

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Big Legal Win for Trump, ICE—and a Setback for Agitators

By The Daily Signal

Amid escalating tensions in Minnesota, Immigration and Customs Enforcement scored a court win on Monday in staving off agitators.

A three-judge panel of the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals put a stay on a lower court ruling that restricted ICE agents from arresting, detaining, or pepper-spraying agitators without probable cause, Fox News reported.

“We accessed and viewed the same videos the district court did,” the appeals court ruling said.

“What they show is observers and protesters engaging in a wide range of conduct, some of it peaceful but much of it not. They also show federal agents responding in various ways.”

Attorney General Pam Bondi posted on X that this was a “WIN AGAINST JUDICIAL ACTIVISM IN MINNESOTA.”

“The [Justice Department] went to court. We got a temporary stay,” Bondi said in the post. “NOW, the 8th Circuit has fully agreed that this reckless attempt to undermine law enforcement cannot stand.”

The federal complaint against the Department of Homeland Security and ICE alleged federal law enforcement violated the civil rights of six protesters.

On Jan. 16, U.S. District Judge Kate Menendez ruled in favor of the plaintiffs and imposed a preliminary injunction to stop tactics used by ICE toward protesters who were demonstrating against immigration enforcement.

Menendez said plaintiffs were likely to succeed in their challenge that federal agents violated protesters’ First Amendment and Fourth Amendment rights as part of Operation Metro Surge in the Twin Cities.

AUTHOR

Fred Lucas

Fred Lucas is chief news correspondent and manager of the Investigative Reporting Project for The Daily Signal. He is the author of “The Myth of Voter Suppression: The Left’s Assault on Clean Elections.” Send an email to Fred. Fred on X: @FredLucasWH.

RELATED POSTS:

Trump makes 4 demands to end Minneapolis chaos, calls on Congress to ban sanctuary cities

Why Is Peggy Flanagan Backing Organizers of Resistance to ICE?

One Person in Critical Condition Following Border Patrol-Involved Shooting in Arizona

Kamala Harris Goes to Bat for Biden Administration Over Not Releasing Epstein Files

A ‘Jailbreak of RINOs’?

Could Tom Homan Create a ‘Model’ in Minneapolis for Dealing With Sanctuary Cities?

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Signal column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


The Daily Signal depends on the support of readers like you. Donate now

Led by Johnson, House Completes Improbable Budgeting Sweep

By Family Research Council

Greenland, Venezuela, and the president’s spat with Canada may have stolen the world’s attention, but the real revelation may be what’s happening here at home. With the snow on its way and no time to spare, House Republicans accomplished what hasn’t been done since America’s top movie was “Titanic” and dial-up AOL was still cutting-edge technology: they finished a federal budget — just like House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) promised they would.

For the Louisiana leader, witnessing history that hasn’t been made since 1997 had to be one of the most gratifying milestones of his speakership. With a majority as wide as a blade of grass, the idea that anyone — let alone this divided chamber — could put their heads down and unite long enough to do their most basic job is a colossal feat.

Johnson, the perennial underdog, cheered the achievement at a press conference Friday before members hit the road to beat the winter storm. “The naysayers said it couldn’t be done, but they were wrong. House Republicans just finished passing all 12 appropriations bills — restoring regular order, cutting spending, locking in Trump-era priorities, and ending Biden-era budgets. No omnibus. No backroom deals. Just hard work and results. Americans sent us here to fix Washington — and this is how it gets done. Huge credit to [Appropriations Chairman] Tom Cole (R-Okla.) and the House Appropriations team,” he said.

Holding signs that read “12 of 12!” the conservative crew that drove the effort took a victory lap. “We aren’t here for another stopgap or temporary fix,” Cole had insisted on the House floor before the final vote. “We are here to finish the job by providing full-year funding and closing out all 12 bills with certainty and direction. …These bills were written with those priorities in mind.”

When the herculean task was complete, something no oddsmaker would have predicted with Congress’s track record, Cole heaped praise on Johnson. “This speaker is the reason that these 12 bills happened,” Cole declared.

For Johnson, the vindication only builds on his already impressive legacy — not that the humble attorney would admit it. “This is a monumental achievement,” he agreed. “Despite the noise, despite our slim margins, despite the fact that most members in the House have never gone through a regular, member-driven appropriations process before, this team got it done,” he said.

Cole also touted the lower price tag of this year’s basket of funding. “Republicans set out to spend less — and total FY26 funding does just that.We committed to codifying DOGE cuts — and these bills cut waste and rein in government bloat.” He paused and added, “This is what responsible governance looks like. This measure is the product of sustained engagement and serious legislating. It advances reforms, delivers full-year funding, and reflects a Congress doing its job.”

In a rare spirit of compromise, several Democrats also joined the unlikely return to governing, supporting most packages by a surprising margin, messaging that they, too, had secured some wins. Even Democrat Rosa DeLauro (Conn.), ranking appropriator, cheered the passage. “We got the bills done, and we came out very well, and that should be proof enough that we need to make the process work,” she said.

For both sides, the eagerness to avoid another government shutdown was a powerful motivator after the political pain of last year’s. But they aren’t out of the woods yet.

The Senate, which spent the last 10 days in recess, will come back to a pile of work — and very little time to do it. Six of the 12 appropriations bills still need the chamber’s approval — including some of the most contentious budgets. But, as The Washington Times points out, Johnson did everything he could to lighten the load by splitting the six bills into two more manageable packages. With the January 30 deadline breathing down Majority Leader John Thune’s (R-S.D.) neck, “Senators will have to take a big swing at passing all six bills before sending them to President Donald Trump’s desk,” Politico explains. But the fact that we’re even talking about that prospect, the outlet acknowledged, “would be a stunning feat for lawmakers and leadership — especially in such a bitterly divided Congress.”

Reflecting on last week, the speaker took his usual humble, future-looking posture. Sitting down with Family Research Council President Tony Perkins on Saturday’s “This Week on Capitol Hill,” he pointed to the high stakes of the election. “We must continue what we’ve been working on, continue to move forward. … We passed the House appropriations bills through the House … [in] regular order. [It’s the] first time in many years that’s happened,” he noted. “We’re rebuilding the muscle memory, as I like to say, and it’s a great advancement to returning power to the people and being better stewards of taxpayer funds.”

And yet, with 11 months until a very significant election, it’s still a daunting task to lead this group, Perkins noted. True, the speaker nodded. “But you know, Scripture says you don’t worry about tomorrow. You focus on the troubles of today because the day has enough. And we do that hour by hour, day by day, in faith and in prayer. We walk forward, we advance these priorities. … And we demonstrate day by day that we’re doing the right thing for the right reason. And I think the voters are going to reward that,” he predicted. “I don’t think they want the chaos and the communism that comes with today’s Democrat[ic] Party. I think they want us to continue to fulfill our promises. And that’s what we’ve done so far. That’s what we’ll do this year. And that will be rewarded at the ballot box.”

AUTHOR

Suzanne Bowdey

Suzanne Bowdey serves as editorial director and senior writer at The Washington Stand.

RELATED ARTICLE: Defense Watchdog’s Audit Finds 245% Increase in Remote DOD Workers after Biden Ordered Their Return to Offices

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2026 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

The Theory and Practice of Sanctuary Cities and States

By Linda Goudsmit

I began publishing a series of humanitarian hoax articles in July 2017, each article beginning with the same dire warning paragraph:

The humanitarian hoax is the deliberate and deceitful tactic of presenting a destructive policy as altruistic. The humanitarian huckster presents himself as a compassionate advocate when in fact he is the disguised enemy.

I identified former president Barack Hussein Obama as the huckster-in-chief and by October 2019, after reaching 50 hoaxes, decided to publish the collection as a book. The Book of Humanitarian Hoaxes: Killing America with ‘Kindness’ was released in June 2020.

It is now January 2026 and time to examine the consequences of the humanitarian hoax policies launched by humanitarian huckster-in-chief Obama during his deceitful 2008-2016 tenure. I have reprinted Hoax 9 below for its historical context.

H OA X 9

The Humanitarian Hoax of Sanctuary Cities

October 1, 2017

The humanitarian hoax is the deliberate and deceitful tactic of presenting a destructive policy as altruistic. The humanitarian huckster presents himself as a compassionate advocate when in fact he is the disguisedenemy.

Barack Obama, humanitarian huckster-in-chief, weakened the United States for eight years by persuading America to accept his obstructive, politically correct sanctuary city policies as altruistic when in fact they were designed to destabilize and destroy civil society.

The term “sanctuary city” originated in the 1980s when San Francisco passed a city ordinance forbidding city police and city magistrates from assisting federal immigration officers in enforcing immigration policies that denied asylum to refugees from Guatemala and El Salvador. The mission of the sanctuary city was to protect innocent refugees from deportation—although these immigrants were in the United States illegally, they had not committed any other crimes.

Today [2017], sanctuary cities are actually sanctuary jurisdictions because they include cities, counties, and, probably soon, states. Over 300 sanctuary jurisdictions exist in America today, actively hindering federal authorities in their ability to seize illegal criminal aliens, rapists, murderers, terrorists, and drug dealers for deportation.

The shocking murder of twenty-one-year-old Kate Steinle on July 1, 2015, publicized the danger of sanctuary jurisdictions. The shooter, Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez, an illegal immigrant from Mexico with seven felony convictions, had been deported five times and intentionally sought shelter in San Francisco. Yet officials in “sanctuary city” San Francisco refused to turn him over to federal authorities for deportation and instead released him into society, enabling him to kill Kate Steinle.

The three Muslim migrant boys ages 7, 10, and 14 who sexually assaulted, raped, and urinated in the mouth of an innocent five-year-old girl in Twin Falls, Idaho, on June 24, 2016, were protected as well. No jail time, no deportation. Instead, according to a courtroom observer, they were found guilty of lewd conduct and placed on probation. These monsters were shielded by the mainstream media and local city officials, who tried to cover up the case and pretend that Twin Falls was a model for multiculturalism. Wendy Olson, Obama-appointed U.S. attorney for Idaho, stunned the country by threatening to prosecute Idahoans who spoke out about the heinous crime in ways SHE considered “false or inflammatory.”

Judge Thomas Borresen issued an equally stunning gag order that denied the right of anyone in the courtroom to speak about the sentencing even AFTER the case ended. Mathew Staver, chairman and co-founder of the nonprofit legal assistance agency Liberty Counsel, says the ruling is completely illegal. “Case law is clear,” he says. “You cannot gag someone after the case is over.”

Twin Falls is one of two Muslim refugee relocation centers in Idaho. Rather than identifying itself as a “sanctuary city,” Twin Falls has chosen the equally disingenuous name of “welcoming city” and declared itself to be a “neighborly community.” REALLY? Protecting rapists and censoring free speech is definitely not neighborly for the victims!

The word sanctuary implies safety from a threat; it does not mean shelter for immigrant criminal felons, rapists, murderers, and terrorists who threaten the safety of law-abiding citizens. Why would any law-abiding citizen endorse the protection of these criminals, whether they are illegal aliens or legal citizens? The answer lies in the active participation by the mainstream media in the Humanitarian Hoax of Sanctuary Cities. The media have deliberately romanticized sanctuary cities as humanitarian havens for the oppressed instead of honestly reporting them as despicable safety zones for criminal aliens. The colluding media have duped the trusting American public and exploited their compassion and goodwill.

The original mission of sanctuary cities has been perverted from the protection of innocent refugees into the protection of guilty criminal aliens at the expense of public safety. Sanctuary cities in America continue to flagrantly defy federal law. Thirty years after San Francisco became the first sanctuary city, California seeks to become the first sanctuary state.

The protection of illegal aliens from deportation incentivizes illegal entry into the United States, which has enormous economic and political consequences. Illegal aliens overload our welfare system, cost American taxpayers a whopping $116 billion per year, and rob Americans of their jobs.

Barack Obama gave sanctuary jurisdictions the freedom to ignore detention orders from the federal agency Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) with his June 2015 executive action establishing the Priority Enforcement Program, allowing local agencies to ignore ICE notifications of deportable aliens in their custody.

To understand Obama’s motive, simply look at the benefits to Democrats of increasing the number of illegal aliens:

  • Secures more Democrat votes for the leftist agenda. Elected leftist Democrats will grant illegals immunity to vote legally and eventually grant them citizenship, knowing they will vote Democrat and ensure Democrat leadership for the foreseeable future.
  • Creates social chaos by importing populations with hostile cultural norms.
  • Creates divisiveness by taking American jobs.
  • Alienates legal citizens, who receive far fewer government benefits than do illegal aliens.
  • Eventually collapses the economies of sanctuary jurisdictions.

Obama’s executive action flagrantly violated 8 U.S.C. § 1373, a 1996 law requiring government entities and officials to cooperate with the Immigration and Naturalization Service, the predecessor of ICE.

Finally, in July 2016 Rep. John Culberson (R-Texas), chair of the Commerce, Justice, and Science Committee on Appropriations, took action against the danger and sent a letter to the Department of Justice demanding that federal law enforcement grants be denied to cities not in compliance with the 1996 law.

During the five years from 2011 to 2016, local and state governments received over $3.4 billion in federal law enforcement grants. Rep. Culberson gave sanctuary jurisdictions a choice: either continue to receive the grant money or protect dangerous illegal criminal aliens. They could no longer do both.

Sanctuary jurisdictions doubled down and continue to defy the law. San Francisco and Santa Clara counties challenged President Trump’s policy in court. In April 2017 U.S. District Judge William Orrick, an Obama appointee, issued a temporary ruling that blocked the president’s directive to withhold federal funding from cities that refuse to comply fully with federal immigration enforcement. The lawfare campaign designed to delay and disrupt President Trump’s America-first agenda was launched.

No-go zones are geographic areas within a country that brazenly disregard the laws of the country. No-go zones establish a two-tier system of justice within a country because they observe a different set of laws. All across Europe, Islamists have established religious no-go zones that recognize Islamic Sharia law exclusively. All across America, leftists have created sanctuary jurisdictions that flagrantly defy federal law.

People will stand quietly and peacefully in long lines until one person jumps the line. It is a fascinating social dynamic that as long as members of a group abide by the same rules, the consequence is harmony. It is the unfairness of the line-jumper that creates anger and social chaos. Social chaos for seismic social change is the goal of the Leftist/Islamist axis that supports the two-tier system of justice created by secular sanctuary jurisdictions and religious no-go zones.

The globalist elite who fund the leftist humanitarian hucksters are desperate to block Trump’s policies that defund sanctuary jurisdictions. The colluding mainstream media continue to deceitfully portray leftist sanctuary jurisdictions as altruistic, denying that protecting illegal criminals at the expense of law-abiding Americans is a sinister leftist political tactic designed to destabilize and destroy America.

If the globalists are successful, the world will be returned to the dystopian existence of masters and slaves because a willfully blind American public was seduced by the Humanitarian Hoax of Sanctuary Cities. The humanitarian hoax will have succeeded in killing America with “kindness.”

END

In 2015 sanctuary jurisdictions numbered 300 cities, in 2026 the expansion of sanctuary jurisdictions now includes cities, counties, and states numbering:

  • 200-300 sanctuary cities
  • 300-400 sanctuary counties
  • 17 sanctuary states including California, Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Utah, Vermont, and Washington + the District of Columbia.

As of late 2025 the proportion of Democrat-controlled vs. Republican-controlled cities, counties and states show a stunning correlation between Democrat control and sanctuary policies:

  • 200-300 sanctuary cities = 94-97% Democrat-controlled, 3-6% Republican-controlled
  • 300-400 sanctuary counties = 80-90% Democrat-controlled, 10-20% Republican-controlled
  • 17 states = 82% (14) Democrat-controlled, 18% (3) Republican controlled

Chaired by Jim Jordan, the January 18, 2024, interim staff report of the Judiciary Committee discloses the catastrophic results of Biden’s open border policy. Titled, “New Data Reveal Worsening Magnitude of the Biden Border Crisis and Lack of Interior Immigration Enforcement,” shows an estimated 5,000 illegal aliens a day were released into the United States. The report reveals that during the two years between January 20, 2021, and August 31, 2023, over 5 million illegal aliens were released into the United States.

The Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) estimates there are approximately 18.6 million illegal alien immigrants living in the United States as of March 2025.

The destructive radical leftist sanctuary policies launched by Barack Obama and advanced by Joe Biden continue to destabilize America and create chaos in every city, county, and state where they have been institutionalized. Obama’s particular deceit is word perversion. The word sanctuary is a powerful emotionally triggering word that generates virtuous feelings of empathy, compassion, protection, and shelter for the innocent. The problem, of course, is that illegally entering the United States is a crime, so there is no such thing as an innocent illegal alien. But we are no longer talking about illegal aliens who have committed no other crimes. Today we are discussing the illegal alien perpetrators of violent crimes.

Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton reports that President Trump’s nationwide March 2025 initiative, Operation Take Back America, “aims to repel the invasion of illegal immigration and protect American communities from perpetrators of violent crimes.”

The illegal aliens that President Trump is deporting in 2026 are criminals who have committed the most heinous crimes in America including murder, rape, promotion of child pornography, sexual assault of a child, burglary, drug trafficking, sex trafficking, arson, unlawful possession of a firearm, and domestic violence. Fitton explains that “Most are members of violent gangs, including the renowned Mara Salvatrucha (MS-13), Tren de Aragua, Latin Kings, 15th Street Gang, Sureños, Paisas and Tango Blast.”

What was the political motive of the open borders and sanctuary policies of the Obama and Biden administrations? Obama’s deceitful sanctuary policies were the first step in today’s radical leftist Democrat nullification. Nullification is derived from its root word nullify which means to make legally null and void; invalidate; cancel; overturn. The Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines nullification as:

  1. The act of nullifying or the state of being nullified.
  2. The action of a state impeding or attempting to prevent the operation and enforcement within its territory of a law of the U.S.
  3. Jury Nullification: the acquitting of a defendant by a jury in disregard of the judge’s instructions and contrary to the jury’s findings of fact.

The theory of sanctuary cities and states was weaponized as the instrument and practice of nullification. And nullification is being supported through seditious lawfare––the strategic weaponization and abuse of the legal system to delegitimize President Trump; impede his presidential efforts to restore law and order in America; and to create overwhelming chaos. Lawfare is the term that combines law and warfare. Lawfare is the abusive exploitation of the legal system against political opponents including appointing radical leftist judges who ignore the law and rule from their own radical leftist political ideology.

The radical leftist Democrat party, with the help of colluding RINOs (Republicans in name only) and the globalist mainstream media, have been bludgeoning law-abiding Americans with Orwellian policies that protect vicious illegal alien criminals at the expense of law-abiding citizens. They have been using lawfare to advance their goals and to neutralize President Trump. WHY? Because nullification, the absolute refusal of states to apply federal law which under the U.S. Constitution they are obligated to do, is designed to challenge the Constitution and ultimately shatter the United States into separate states.

The trajectory and progression from sanctuary cities to sanctuary states to nullification of the supremacy of federal and constitutional law, culminates in the collapse of the union of fifty states. What then? Possibilities include:

  • Sanctuary states withdrawing from the union
  • Civil war between sanctuary states and constitutional states
  • Demise of the United States of America with constitutional states remaining united in a constitutional republic as envisioned by our Founding Fathers, and sanctuary states reconstituted in form and content parallel to the European Union––ideologically, politically, and economically united but not necessarily contiguous geographically.

The radical leftist Democrat party is the ideological, political, and economic enemy within. Its anti-American, anti-Judeo-Christian, pro-Muslim, Marxist platform is wholly antithetical to the precepts and constitutional laws of the United States.

Current events in Minnesota demonstrate the defiance and nullification protocols being encouraged by Democrat Governor Tim Walz and the Democrat mayors of Minneapolis and St. Paul. Telling citizens to defy ICE agents and challenge their federal authority is nullification. These seditious events and challenges are being promoted across the country in Democrat-controlled sanctuary cities and states. They are the movement of the radical leftist Democrat/Socialist party. This is an ideological war being waged by Americans, against Americans, in America!

Sanctuary cities and states are a consummate humanitarian hoax designed to collapse the United States. They are an essential part of the overarching globalist war on nation-states. Globalism is a replacement ideology that seeks to reorder the world into one singular, planetary Unistate, ruled by the globalist elite.

The globalist war on nation-states cannot succeed without collapsing the United States of America. The long-term strategic attack plan moves America incrementally from constitutional republic to socialism to globalism to feudalism. Europe has already fallen, and the radical leftist Democrat/Socialist party in America, funded and fomented by the globalist elite, is using lawfare, sanctuary cities, and sanctuary states as its instruments of nullification to collapse the United States from within. Nullification is globalism’s existential threat to America that must be confronted and defeated.

©2026 . All rights reserved.

RELATED VIDEO: President Trump: Sanctuary Cities/Blue States ZERO federal dollars starting February 1, 2026


Please visite Linda’s pundicity page: goudsmit.pundicity.com  and her website: lindagoudsmit.com 

Order her book: Space Is No Longer the Final Frontier––Reality Is is available in paperback, hardback, and ebook formats on barnesandnoble.comamazon.com, and directly from Ingram in paperback.

Bureaucrats’ Political Donations Hint Census Bureau Over-Counting for Democrats May Not Be Coincidental

By Family Research Council

Undercounting the population in red states like Texas and Florida in 2020 cost Republicans at least six seats in the House of Representatives, while overcounting in blue states like California and New York contributed to 18 new Democratic seats, according to Rep. Wesley Hunt (R-Texas).

“In 2020, the Census Bureau undercounted in primarily deep-red states like Arkansas, Florida, Mississippi, Tennessee and Texas, all red, while overcounting in radical blue states like Delaware, Hawaii, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New York, Ohio, and Rhode Island,” Hunt told a November 19, 2025, hearing of the House Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on the Constitution and Limited Government.

“This egregious error led to many states being denied proper representation in Congress and the Electoral College. So much so that these errors costs Republicans … six seats in the House. In addition to the 2020 miscounting, including illegal immigrants in the Census has improperly granted radical Left blue states 12 additional seats in the United States House of Representatives. That is a total of 18 seats gain and that is a huge problem. And those are the facts,” Hunt told the hearing.

The Census Bureau acknowledged the over and under counts in a May 2025 report. The Census Bureau uses its population counts as the basis for determining how many House of Representatives seats are in each of the 50 states. The census counts all present individuals without distinguishing between citizens and noncitizens, meaning a higher head count gives a state more House seats, without regard to citizenship status. It is illegal for noncitizens to vote in all federal elections, as well as the vast majority of state and local contests.

Not all of the undercounted states were red, as deep-blue Illinois was among this group, while not all of the overcounted states were blue. Ohio and Utah, both red states, were among the over-counted group, according to the Census report.

Most congressional Republicans like Hunt support requiring Census Bureau counters to at least include a question about the citizenship of every counted individual, while most congressional Democrats oppose such a requirement. The issue has intensified in recent years, especially during the Biden administration’s open-border era in which millions of illegal immigrants crossed into the U.S.

Legislation originally introduced in the House of Representatives in 2025 by Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) — The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act — requires proof of citizenship when registering to vote and provides criminal penalties for violations. The measure, which has 110 House co-sponsors, including Hunt, passed the lower chamber but has not been acted upon by the Senate. President Donald Trump supports the measure.

Hunt did not address the issue of whether political bias within the Census Bureau’s workforce could be a factor in the significant under and overcounting, but The Washington Stand’s review of Federal Election Commission (FEC) campaign contribution data for the years 2023, 2024, and 2025 found a huge bias in favor of Democrats among donors who said they work for the agency.

During the three years indicated, the FEC records disclosed 4,037 contributions by individuals who listed “U.S. Census Bureau” as their employer. Of those contributions, 3,583 went to Democrats, compared to 455 made to Republicans, for a 7-1 ratio. The average Democrat contribution was for $29, while the average Republican contribution was $229.

Interestingly, the total dollar value of the contributions by Census Bureau workers to Democrats was $104,597, only slightly more than the $104,130 total given to Republicans.

Federal workers like those at the Census Bureau are covered by the Hatch Act, which bars partisan political activities by government employees while on official duty. The Hatch Act does not limit the right of government employees to work for candidates while off-duty, to contribute to the candidates of their choice, or to participate in activities supporting candidates, as long as federal property is not used in the process.

Two-thirds of the Democratic contributions, or 1,999 of the 3,582 total, were given through Act Blue, a digital site that acts as a conduit for campaign funding from individuals to favored candidates. Winred, the similar digital site created by Republicans to counter Act Blue, accounted for only 253 contributions to GOP candidates by Census Bureau workers.

Former Vice President Kamala Harris, the 2024 Democratic presidential nominee, received 347 contributions from Census workers, compared to just 69 for Trump, her 2024 Republican rival.

Apprised of the Census Bureau employee contribution bias, Hunt provided the following statement to The Washington Stand:

“The inaccuracies and deliberate manipulations embedded in Democrat-led Census reporting expose a level of corruption that plagued the previous administration and continues today under radical Left leadership. Despite these efforts, the American people saw through the deception and delivered a decisive victory for Donald Trump in the last election.

“Now, with Republicans holding all three chambers of government, we have both the responsibility and the obligation to correct these abuses immediately and restore integrity to the process by ensuring that Census data reflects only United States citizens.

“The irony is unmistakable. For years, Democrats have warned of a supposed threat to democracy, while actively engaging in the very practices that undermine it — manipulating systems designed to distort representation and influence elections. Democracy is not endangered by transparency and lawful governance. It is endangered by those who abuse institutions for political gain.”

Hunt will not be in the House of Representatives in 2027, as he is seeking the Republican nomination for the Senate in a hotly contested primary that also includes Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and the Lone Star State’s long-serving incumbent, Senator John Cornyn. The primary election is March 3.

AUTHOR

Mark Tapscott

Mark Tapscott is senior congressional analyst at The Washington Stand.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Blue States Wage War on Republican Congressional Seats

‘So Help Me Law’? New Jersey Governor Sworn in on Constitution, Not Bible

PERKINS: Is the Law beyond Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison?

RELATED VIDEOS:

STEPHEN MILLER: ‘This was the plan all along… get them here illegally then give them access to the voting booth!

President Trump Gaggles with Press on Air Force One En Route Joint Base Andrews, Jan. 22, 2026

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2026 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

German Chancellor Admits Europe ‘Wasted Incredible Potential’ By Bureaucracy, Over-Regulation

By The Daily Caller

German Chancellor Freidrich Merz told the World Economic Forum (WEF) that Germany and the European Union (EU) have “wasted incredible potential” during his speech Thursday.

Merz, a member of the center-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU), said the EU has wasted its potential for growth by curtailing freedom and responsibility.

“Both Germany and Europe have wasted incredible potential for growth in recent years by dragging feet on reforms and unnecessarily and excessively curtailing entrepreneurial freedoms and personal responsibility,” the Chancellor stated in his remarks to the WEF in Davos, Switzerland. “We are going to change that now.”

“We must reduce bureaucracy substantially in Europe,” Merz continued. “The single market was once created to form the most competitive economic area in the world. Instead, we have become the world champion of over-regulation. That has to end.”

German Chancellor Merz admits:

Both Germany and Europe have wasted incredible potential for growth in recent years by dragging their feet on reforms and by unnecessarily and excessively curtailing entrepreneurial freedom and personal responsibility.

We must substantially… pic.twitter.com/BSQib4BWqZ

— Clash Report (@clashreport) January 22, 2026

“Security and predictability take precedence over excessive regulation and misplaced perfection,” he added.

Merz also stated in his speech that Europe “is not at the mercy” of what he described as a “new world order.”

“The old world order is unraveling at breathtaking pace. We have entered an era where only power counts, a dangerous place,” the chancellor said, according to multiple outlets. “We [Europe] do not have to accept this new reality as fate.”

Merz recently admitted the country’s shutdown of nuclear power plants was a “serious strategic mistake” in a speech to the German Chamber of Industry.

The chancellor said in November 2025 that he would “begin discussing repatriation of Syrians in Germany,” after previously refusing to work with a right-wing party advocating for the policy.

AUTHOR

Jack Cowhick

Contributor

RELATED ARTICLES:

A Caesar in the White House

Germany Finally Admits Nuking Its Energy Sector For No Reason Was A Bad Idea

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

Reflections on the Anniversary of “Roe v. Wade”

By Jerry Newcombe, D. Min.

A recent historian said that a line from the Declaration of Independence is the most important sentence in history. Well, certainly that sentence is exceedingly important, but I agree with those who counter-argue, “No, actually John 3:16 is the most important sentence in history.”

Meanwhile, the great statement in the Declaration is: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal and are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” The Creator has bestowed upon us the right to life, but how can you square that right to live with the supposed right to abortion?

I write this piece around the anniversary of the January 22, 1973, Supreme Court decision of Roe v. Wade and its companion decision of the same day, Doe v. Bolton. These two decisions combined gave us abortion on demand even up to the moment of birth. And about 65 million abortions have taken place since that day.

Although Roe was overturned in 2022 by the Dobbs v. Jackson, the fallout from Roe continues. It’s like a phantom limb syndrome, where one is feeling a missing limb as if it’s still attached.

Abortion is the Holy Grail to the Amerian left. It dominates virtually all other considerations.  Roe v. Wade has been tantamount to Scripture to some on the left.

But, lo and behold, it was all based on lies.

One of the main lies was that an abortion was needed for “Jane Roe” (whom we later learned was Norma McCorvey) because she was supposedly gang-raped. But that was not true. She had just been impregnated by her boyfriend.

McCorvey just wanted an abortion, and her attorney falsely promised to help her get one, knowing full well it could not happen in time (since cases that go up to the Supreme Court take a while to adjudicate).

Another lie is that the baby in the womb is a blob of tissue or clump of cells—but not a human being, deserving of legal protection. The heart starts beating at 22 days after conception, arm and leg buds appear by 28 days, and brain waves can be recorded by 40 days. Some blob.

Yet another lie to sell abortion was the number of women who supposedly died in America because of illegal abortions. Abortionist Bernard Nathanson told the media that each year about 10,000 women died from illegal abortions.

And yet a willing media reported this statistic as if it were gospel truth. I’ve read that in 1972, the last year before Roe, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) in Atlanta had reported that 39 women in America had died from illegal abortions. That may be 39 too many, but it’s a far cry from 10,000.

Thankfully, both Norma McCorvey and Bernard Nathanson became pro-life Christians and came to strongly oppose abortion.

We are also grateful that Roe was overturned in the 2022 case of Dobbs v. Jackson, but there is still widespread support for abortion, among many Americans—even among some professing Christians.

But God says He opposes the shedding of innocent blood. And our nation’s founders said that God has given us the right to life.

America has recently celebrated Martin Luther King day. And I’m grateful that his niece, Dr. Alveda King, is outspoken in her pro-life views.

I’ve interviewed Alveda King a few times for Christian media, and she told us: “In 1966, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was one of the first recipients of the Margaret Sanger Award. Margaret Sanger is the founder of Planned Parenthood, and they are the largest abortion providers in America. So, people say, ‘Oh wow, Dr. King supported Planned Parenthood.’ Actually, he did not.”

Alveda explains why not: “If you read Dr. King’s statements or if you knew him as I did, Dr. King said, ‘The negro cannot win if he’s willing to sacrifice the futures of his children for immediate personal comfort and safety.’ In 1966, abortion was illegal in absolutely every state….If anybody had said that same organization will be at the forefront of the abortions or deaths of over 50 million babies, then Dr. King would have said, ‘No thank you.’ Dr. King was a pro-life, gentle person.”

Alveda added: “It’s unjust to kill a little person because they’re little. A woman has a right to choose what she does with her body, but where is a lawyer for the baby? How can the dream survive, if we murder the children?”

On this anniversary of Roe v. Wade, we’re thankful for the progress made in the right-to-life movement. But we also see we have much ground to cover in America to see a resurgence of valuing the right to life, at all stages of development.

©2026 All rights reserved.

4 Ways Trump Has Dismantled the ‘Deep State’ Since Inauguration

By The Daily Signal

On the anniversary of President Donald Trump’s second term inauguration, here are four ways he has dismantled the deep state in Washington.

1. Reinstating ‘Schedule F’

On his first day in office, Trump signed an executive order to reinstate Schedule F, which makes it easier for the president to fire bureaucrats.

The Daily Signal depends on the support of readers like you. Donate now

This reclassified about 50,000 career civil servants in “policy-influencing” roles as at-will employees.

The executive order said that accountability was lacking in the federal bureaucracy.

“In recent years, however, there have been numerous and well-documented cases of career Federal employees resisting and undermining the policies and directives of their executive leadership,” the order said.

“Principles of good administration, therefore, necessitate action to restore accountability to the career civil service, beginning with positions of a confidential, policy-determining, policy-making, or policy-advocating character.”

2. DOGE

The Department of Government Efficiency reportedly reduced federal employment by about 271,000 jobs.

DOGE also provided a list of 9,474 contracts and vehicles that have been terminated by the department.

In the spirit of DOGE, the Trump administration cut off the funding streams for immigration groups that moved illegal aliens across the country. The Environmental Protection Agency clawed back extravagant grants to climate alarmist groups. The State Department shuttered the U.S. Agency for International DevelopmentCongress finally cut off funding for National Public Radio and the Public Broadcasting Service.

3. Shutdown Cuts

During the recent government shutdown, Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought cut $8 billion of blue-state energy projects.

“Nearly $8 billion in Green New Scam funding to fuel the Left’s climate agenda is being cancelled,” Vought said.

In addition, the Department of Transportation sent letters to the Chicago Transit Authority informing it that two projects receiving a total of $2.1 billion in federal funding were under administrative review, for race and sex-based contracting practices that potentially violated the Constitution.

4. Investigating ‘Deep State’ Abuses

In July, a CIA report found that John Brennan, the agency’s director in the Obama administration, overrode internal concerns to claim that Russia interfered in the 2016 election.

The agency’s current director John Ratcliffe ordered the review. It found that evidence used by Brennan to show that Russian President Vladimir Putin was aiding Trump in the 2016 election was rushed, restricted in its access, and disseminated too widely for a highly classified report.

“Central to the judgment that Putin ‘aspired’ to help Trump win was one highly classified CIA report,” the report said. “Brennan had tightly restricted access to this information within CIA; it had been collected in July but not disseminated in CIA serialized reporting until the week of 19 December.”

The review notes that “media leaks” indicated intelligence agencies “had already reached definitive conclusions risked creating an anchoring bias” before “work on the assessment even began.”

AUTHOR

Elizabeth Troutman Mitchell

Elizabeth Troutman Mitchell is the White House Correspondent for “The Daily Signal.” Send her an email. Elizabeth on X: @TheElizMitchell.

Dan Franzese Launches Campaign for Congress in President Trump’s Home District in Palm Beach County [Florida’s 22nd District]

By Editorial Board – DrRichSwier.com

 /PRNewswire/ — Dan Franzese announced today the official launch of his campaign for the U.S. House of Representatives in President Donald J. Trump’s home district in Palm Beach County, Florida (FL CD -22), running on a record of business leadership, community service, and conservative values.

WATCH: DAN FRANZESE FOR CONGRESS 2026

Franzese is a proud America First candidate who enters the race focused on affordability, accountability, and ensuring South Florida families have a representative who delivers results and puts the district first.

“Florida needs leaders who know how to build, manage, and deliver results, not just talk about them,” said Dan Franzese. “I’ve spent my life creating jobs, balancing budgets, and solving problems. In Congress, I will focus on affordability, responsible governance, and policies that strengthen Florida families and our local economy.”

An honors graduate of Amherst College who also earned an MBA at the Wharton School of Business, Franzese built a decades-long career in finance and investment management, helping grow businesses, create jobs, and responsibly steward capital. He later brought those same principles to his community, serving as a church treasurer and chief financial officer, strengthening financial controls and restoring fiscal balance, an experience he says is essential for effective representation.

Franzese was the Republican nominee for Florida’s 22nd Congressional District in 2024, winning a competitive three-way primary with 53 percent of the vote and mounting the strongest challenge ever against the long-time Democratic incumbent, Lois Frankel. He earned the 2024 endorsement of President Donald J. Trump, who praised Franzese as a leader who understands how to grow the economy, lower taxes, and eliminate government waste.

“With President Trump leading our nation, Florida needs strong partners in Congress who will help advance policies that deliver real results,” Franzese said. “I will work side by side with President Trump to keep America strong by defending our Constitution, promoting economic growth, and ensuring accountability to the people we serve.”

Franzese emphasized that his campaign will focus on Florida-first priorities, practical solutions, and restoring trust between voters and their elected representatives.

“This campaign is about results, not rhetoric,” Franzese added. “Floridians deserve a representative who understands their lives, respects their values, and knows how to get things done.”

You can learn more about Dan and his campaign at DanForUSA.com.

Contact: Vicky Franzese at web@danforfl.com

©2026 . All rights reserved.

HUGE WIN: Supreme Court Reopens Mail-In Ballot Fight

By The Geller Report

BREAKING: In a HUGE win, the Supreme Court just ruled that Congressional candidates can legally challenge mail-in voting laws reviving a GOP challenge to the late-counting of mail-in ballots

Illinois allows late mail-in ballots to be counted late, after election day for up to two weeks

SCOTUS has upheld Rep. Bost’s (R) standing to challenge this law in favor of a SINGLE election day.

The U.S. Supreme Court has revived a Republican-led legal challenge to an Illinois election law that allows mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted if they arrive up to 14 days later. In Supreme Court of the United States’s decision in Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections, the justices ruled that the plaintiffs—including Rep. Mike Bost and two Republican presidential electors—have standing to sue, overturning lower-court rulings that had dismissed the case for lack of harm.

The challengers argue Illinois’ late-receipt rule violates federal election statutes governing the timing of federal elections. The Supreme Court did not rule on the merits of the law itself; instead, it sent the case back to continue in lower courts, reopening a high-stakes fight over whether ballots received after Election Day can legally be counted in federal races.

Supreme Court revives GOP lawmakers’ challenge to Illinois election law

by Jessica A. Botewlho, The National News Desk • Wed, January 14, 2026:

WASHINGTON (TNND) — The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday revived a legal challenge by Republican lawmakers to an Illinois election law that allows ballots received after Election Day to be counted, ruling that the challengers have standing to bring their case despite lower court’s earlier decisions to the contrary.

The case, Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections (No. 24-568), was brought by U.S. Rep. Mike Bost and two Republican presidential electors who argued that the state’s practice of counting certain absentee ballots received up to 14 days after Election Day violates federal election statutes.

FILE – Rep.-elect Mike Bost (R-IL) yells out as Rep.-elect Matt Gaetz (R-FL) delivers remarks in the House Chamber during the fourth day of elections for Speaker of the House at the U.S. Capitol Building on January 06, 2023 in Washington. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)
FILE – Rep.-elect Mike Bost (R-IL) yells out as Rep.-elect Matt Gaetz (R-FL) delivers remarks in the House Chamber during the fourth day of elections for Speaker of the House at the U.S. Capitol Building on January 06, 2023 in Washington. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

Under Illinois law, mail-in ballots postmarked on or before Election Day may be counted if received within two weeks after the election.

Lower courts had rejected the lawsuit before it reached the Supreme Court. Both the federal district court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ruled that the plaintiffs lacked Article III standing — meaning they failed to show they were sufficiently harmed by the law to bring a constitutional challenge.

The Supreme Court’s decision reverses that determination, allowing the case to proceed.

Continue reading.

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

POST ON X:

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Minnesota Somali Fraud, Illegal Trucking Scandals Share One Thing: DEI

By The Daily Signal

Editor’s note: This is a lightly edited transcript of today’s video from Daily Signal Senior Contributor Victor Davis Hanson. Subscribe to our YouTube channel to see more of his videos.

This content was recorded by Victor Davis Hanson prior to his Dec. 30 medical operation.

Hello, this is Victor Davis Hanson for The Daily Signal. We’ve talked in the past about the problems with diversity, equity, and inclusion. That’s the rubric for what, I guess, we could call mandated equality of result, rather than of opportunity. But it’s been in the news lately because there’s a common denominator between the $9 to $10 billion, and climbing, fraud among the Somali community—some of them—in Minnesota.

Here in California, we’re looking at $60 to $70 billion fraud, involving everything from homeless funds that were misspent through corruption, wasted, and unemployment insurance, etc., etc. We have the problem with the truck drivers. We had 17,000 licenses given to illegal aliens in California and put many of us in danger who drive frequently on the California freeways. That’s true nationwide as well.

And then, of course, the unknown number, it’s in the several millions, somewhere between 8 and 12 million, who came in under the Biden administration.

But they were all given exemptions, is what I’m trying to say. And the exemptions were subtle and insidious, but they were characterized that they were DEI. In other words, all of these different groups were categorized by officials as on the victimized, oppressed side of the lecture. And therefore, they were not completely audited. Because, if they had been audited, the cries of racism, nativism, etc., prejudice, bias would’ve been voiced. And people didn’t want to be exposed to that.

What happens, then, when you have DEI, there is no deterrence. The particular groups that are favored on non-meritocratic grounds feel that if the society, at large, does not audit them the way—whether that’s immigration audits or welfare audits, or unemployment audits—then why would they audit them under further circumstances? So, that creates a self-perpetuating, almost a self-motion machine that they will continue to engage in activity for which they don’t feel there will be any consequences. And deterrence is lost.

More importantly, if you are a DEI beneficiary—in other words, you applied to college and your SAT scores or your grade did not otherwise qualify you, or you’re a professor who plagiarized but was given a pass because of DEI grounds—then what happens is you must continually make the case that you are a victim because that alone will explain why you got this position, why you got this admission, when you did not have otherwise standard meritocratic qualifications. And that means you’re always going to be on the hunt for victimization.

If you’re Joy Reid and you can’t do a podcast without spouting racist nonsense, and your audience is crumbling and eroding, then you say that you’re constantly a victim of racism. If you’re on “The View,” and you have a one-dimensional view of race, and you’re boring, and you’re losing market share, you say it’s because of yet another incident of racism that you felt.

The other thing that’s a problem with DEI, there are no qualifications now. Once you destroy meritocracy for one group, then all groups feel, well, these people were given particular advantages. So, why don’t we get them?

And you know, the funny thing about it is we did have a kind of DEI for very wealthy people, very connected people, the children of billionaires, the children of college deans, who were given admission advantages or were hired in what we call the old-boy network. But meritocracy was supposed to be the antidote.

So, DEI was, in a very strange, ironic way, just the twin of the old-boy network, substituting race for money and influence that the old-boy network exercised. That was the fuel that drove that.

Finally, there’s a couple of final things. It’s costly because once you add layer under layer under layer of nonproductive people, who are not teaching in the university, they’re not doing research, but they’re monitoring everybody’s syllabus, they’re looking for DEI owes among applicants, they are perched on hiring committees, they have a huge bureaucracy, and they’re nonproductive.

They’re very similar to the commissar system in the Soviet Union that was very, not just a sin of commission, that they were wasting resources and causing a lot of problems and killing people, but a sin of omission, that by funding the commissars, you were not funding science or you were not funding meritocratic military schools. You were appointing military officers in World War II on the basis of their ideology rather than on their proven excellence on the battlefield. So, it doesn’t have a good history—DEI.

And one thing that we’re watching now, as the Trump administration makes a very persuasive case that DEI violated the civil rights laws of the 1960s, specifically ’64 and ’65, and the Supreme Court ruling of 2023, there is no moral, legal support for it anymore. And yet, we have this vast, top-heavy infrastructure—this ossified, calcified, DEI apparat—and it’s not legally or morally justified.

So, it’s gonna be very interesting to see what happens to the DEI complex. But let’s hope that it dies on the vine, at last.

We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Daily Signal.

AUTHOR

Victor Davis Hanson

Victor Davis Hanson, a senior contributor for The Daily Signal, is a classicist and historian at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University and host of “The Victor Davis Hanson Show.” His website, The Blade of Perseus, features columns, lectures, and exclusive content for subscribers. Contact him at authorvdh@gmail.com. VD on X: @VDHanson.

RELATED POSTS:

Victor Davis Hanson: The Common Denominator of the Issues Troubling Me Most

Looking Ahead, 2026 Could Be America’s Next Economic Boom

Victor Davis Hanson: The Danger of Dumbing Down American Students

Preident Trump Ends Temporary Protected Status for Somalia

Trump Freezes All Immigration From Somalia Amid Massive Fraud Scandal

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Signal column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


The Daily Signal depends on the support of readers like you. Donate now

Democrat Controlled Cities Have Wimps for Police Chiefs

By Royal A. Brown III

Oh Boo Hoo Hoo — this is what happens with Democrat controlled sancturay cities like Portland, OR hire a wimp, rather than a real man, for a police chief who cries over 2 hispanic gang bangers being shot. Same police department that allows Antifa to run rampant over Portland.

Story by Michael Dorgan

Portland Police Chief Bob Day wiped away tears Friday as he addressed new information showing that two illegal immigrants shot during a federal immigration enforcement encounter had ties to the violent Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua (TdA).

Day confirmed a Department of Homeland Security statement identifying the two individuals — Luis David Nico Moncada and Yorlenys Betzabeth Zambrano-Contreras — as Venezuelan criminal illegal aliens with suspected ties to TdA.

Both were shot by a U.S. Customs and Border Protection agent after Moncada, the driver of the vehicle, allegedly “weaponized his vehicle” and attempted to run over agents, prompting an agent to fire in self-defense, according to DHS.

Continue reading.

They have same type Police Chief in Minneapolis, Minisota siding with corrupt Somalians ripping off taxpayers with fraudulent child care centers as well as allowing protestors to mob city streets without taking action.

Minneapolis police chief issues apology for linking Somali youth to local crime

In a heartfelt address at a Thursday news conference, Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O’Hara apologized to the local Somali community for comments he made that appeared to connect “East African kids” to criminal activity in the city. “The Somali community here in Minneapolis has been welcoming and has shown love towards me, and I appreciate it,” O’Hara stated, acknowledging the three years of collaborative work they’ve undertaken to address serious issues affecting the community. While emphasizing the need for honesty about real problems facing Minneapolis, he expressed regret for any harm caused by statements that may have been taken out of context, as his intention was never to cause pain or division.

The controversy stemmed from an interview O’Hara gave to WCCO earlier in the month while discussing a deadly Halloween shooting and juvenile crime in Minneapolis. During this conversation, he remarked that the young people committing crimes in the Dinkytown area weren’t “poor kids from Minneapolis” but rather youth from surrounding communities who take “mommy’s Mercedes-Benz to Dinkytown.” He specifically mentioned “groups of East African kids” coming from various surrounding communities. These comments sparked immediate backlash, leading to a Change.org petition demanding an apology, which argued that the East African community had “already been carrying the weight of unfair scrutiny for years” and that the chief’s remarks would only intensify that burden.

This local controversy emerges against a backdrop of heightened national attention on Minneapolis’s Somali community following a recent investigative report by Ryan Thorpe and Christopher F. Rufo of the Manhattan Institute. Their findings alleged that taxpayer dollars from Minnesota were being funneled to Al-Shabaab, an al Qaeda-linked terrorist organization in Somalia, through various financial schemes. A former official who worked with the Minneapolis Joint Terrorism Task Force was quoted saying, “Every scrap of economic activity… anywhere Somalis are concentrated, every cent that is sent back to Somalia benefits Al-Shabaab in some way.” This report has intensified scrutiny on the community and raised questions about financial transfers between Minnesota and Somalia.

In the wake of these allegations, President Donald Trump announced on Truth Social that he was terminating Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Somalis in Minnesota “effective immediately.” His statement claimed that “Minnesota, under Governor Waltz, is a hub of fraudulent money laundering activity” and that “Somali gangs are terrorizing the people of that great State, and BILLIONS of dollars are missing.” Christopher Rufo, co-author of the report that sparked this reaction, described Trump’s announcement as “a great start” and called for reviewing “all asylum, refugee, and citizenship applications” and initiating “denaturalizations and mass deportations up to the furthest limits of the law.”

Continue reading.

©2026 . All rights reserved.

Leftist Group Dodges Accountability for ‘Hate Group’ Accusation After Judge Blocks Discovery

By The Daily Signal

A federal judge dismissed a conservative nonprofit’s defamation lawsuit against the Southern Poverty Law Center Wednesday, reversing a previous judge’s theory of the case.

Critics say the SPLC routinely smears mainstream conservative and Christian groups by placing them on a “hate map” with chapters of the Ku Klux Klan. D.A. King, founder of the Dustin Inman Society, sued the center for defamation after it branded his Georgia-based organization—which opposes illegal immigration—an “anti-immigrant hate group.”

Judge W. Keith Watkins of the Middle District of Alabama allowed the defamation case to move forward in 2023, but Judge Corey L. Maze of the Northern District of Alabama later took the case.

The Daily Signal depends on the support of readers like you. Donate now

After discovery—the legal process of acquiring documents to prove a case—Maze ruled Wednesday that most of King’s claims fell outside the statute of limitations, and that King further failed to prove the center acted with “actual malice” in re-publishing the “hate group” accusation. King died last year, but his estate is a plaintiff in the case.

Harry Mihet, chief litigation counsel for Liberty Counsel and one of King’s attorneys, told The Daily Signal that Judge Maze took the wrong approach to the case.

“I think the first judge who looked at this issue got it exactly right and the court currently got it exactly wrong,” Mihet told The Daily Signal in a phone call Thursday.

“The first judge looked at this in careful detail and nothing’s changed since. Whether something is time barred is a matter of law, so that should not have been affected by the facts in discovery.”

Watkins’ Ruling on the SPLC

King sued in April 2022, meaning the SPLC’s initial “hate group” accusation in 2018 fell outside of Alabama’s statute of limitations.

However, the center has repeated its accusation each year since, so Judge Watkins ruled as timely the accusation published in 2021.

Watkins also found that, because the SPLC initially stated in 2011 that the Dustin Inman Society was not a “hate group” before reversing course, the center may have smeared the society despite knowing that it was not an “anti-immigrant hate group.”

Defamation cases face high hurdles due to the Supreme Court’s precedents from New York Times v. Sullivan (1964) onward.

Watkins found the SPLC’s specific claim that the society—which has legal immigrants on its board—”poses as an organization concerned about immigration issues, yet focuses on vilifying all immigrants” likely met the defamation standard of “actual malice,” where the defendant publishes a provably false statement while likely suspecting the statement was false.

Since the SPLC uses this claim to support its “hate group” designation, republished every year, Watkins ruled the claim did not fall outside the statute of limitations.

Maze’s Reversal

Yet Judge Maze reversed the decision, holding that the initial 2018 “hate group” designation, and the subsequent “extremist profile” explaining it, fell outside the statute.

Maze found only one claim timely—the 2021 “hate group” accusation—and he ruled that King failed to show the SPLC acted with “actual malice,” because he had no evidence that the SPLC staffer who made the 2021 decision, Keegan Hankes, had reason to doubt the truth of the accusation.

Maze wrote that the SPLC’s claim that the society vilifies all immigrants “is non-actionable rhetorical hyperbole,” the kind of “loose, figurative language that no reasonable person would believe presented facts.”

260107.KING.Memorandum Opinion.EFS.Doc 134Download

What Went Wrong?

Mihet, King’s attorney, accused Judge Maze, a Republican and appointee of President Donald Trump, and his magistrate judge of defending the SPLC.

“They really hamstrung our hands in discovery in terms of what we could ask and receive from the SPLC,” the attorney told The Daily Signal. “They protected the SPLC vehemently.”

“Now he complains that we didn’t show him more evidence in discovery,” Mihet added. “It’s because he and his magistrate carefully circumscribed the scope of discovery.”

Mihet said he aimed to reveal a pattern of the SPLC smearing conservatives, but the judge would not allow “this line of questioning.”

Todd McMurtry, King’s lead attorney, told The Daily Signal he has not yet decided whether to appeal the ruling.

“We will review the decision and evaluate next steps,” he said.

The SPLC did not respond to The Daily Signal’s request for comment.

AUTHOR

Tyler O’Neil

Tyler O’Neil is senior editor at The Daily Signal and the author of two books: “Making Hate Pay: The Corruption of the Southern Poverty Law Center,” and “The Woketopus: The Dark Money Cabal Manipulating the Federal Government.” Tyler on X: @Tyler2ONeil.

RELATED POSTS:

Trump Judge Pick Issues Opinion Bolstering President’s Deportation Agenda

‘RIGHT OUT OF 1984’: Judeo-Christian Law Firm Sues Michigan AG for Attacking Free Speech by Endorsing ‘Hate Group’ Smear

Fani Willis’ Case Against Trump Is Officially Over

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Signal column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

California Screaming is Becoming a Reality

By Karen Schoen

How many of you think that what goes on in California stays in California? NOPE! Boy are we naive if we think that what goes on in California does not affects every state in the Union. It seems as though Californians have taken the “We are stupid” pill and will now pay the price at the pump and pay more for all the goods at the grocery store. Every necessity is about to escalate into the ‘I can’t afford it’ category.

How did that happen? Well, Newsom is a socialist governor who seems to feel that the cost of the regulations he puts in place don’t have any consequences on Californians and certainly don’t affect him. The regulations in AB-5 are about to strangle the 70,000 truckers who just learned they can no longer be independent truckers. AB-5 is forcing them to become W-2 employees of their carriers or be fined. No small businesses for them.

The carrier companies they work for said “No, we cannot afford to W2 these independent truckers who own their own rigs. We’ll leave California.” The truckers said “No, we want to be independent so we’ll leave California!” And a huge portion of the 70,000 independent truckers have left California or are in the process of leaving. The carriers, aka Freight Handlers, who are national corporations said “We’ll leave too. We will move to another state.” Landstar, a national company, issued one statement, “LEAVE.”

So what did Newsom do? He hired illegals to replace the American truckers. What does that mean? It means Americans are at risk from truckers who can’t read English and cause accidents. It means goods sitting at the docks can’t be distributed throughout America. That affects all of us. It also means that Californians lost government funding from the DOT for breaking federal law and hiring illegals.

To add insult to injury, the heavy duty regulations placed on the refineries are causing refineries to leave California. California is about to lose 20% of its power … of its fuel. This is causing gas prices to rise unchecked in California, Arizona and Nevada. Newsom is blaming high profitability on refineries as the cause for escalating prices. His Public Service Commission told him it was due to his regulations. But Newsom is stubborn and does not pay attention and basically doesn’t care. After all he’s rich and can afford high gas prices.

Newsom’s solution, Pay the refineries subsidies to stay in CA. YES those same companies he put out of business will now be subsidized to stay. In addition CA will no be getting oil from ASIA at a much higher price. Newsom is either evil, doesn’t care or has zero common sense.

The question is whether California will be smart enough to choose a different route as they choose their new governor or will they sit back and let the insane regulations of environmentalists destroy everything they worked hard to achieve. Do they care where their taxes are going? That remains to be seen. But, what will that do to the rest of us as the goods pile up on the docks and the prices go higher and higher and higher. CA is filled with waste fraud and abuse. Is this what you want America to look like? If we thought Minnesota was bad just look at what this incompetent, selfish governor did to the once great state of CALIFORNIA. Then ask yourself, “Is this who I want as a president?”

Let’s look around the world and around your state. Has Trump made a difference?

Love him or hate him, one thing is certain, there will never be another President like Trump. Until Trump, our leaders did not respect America or Americans. We were the meat the parasites could eat and drain us until there was nothing left. Americans were the givers and they were the takers. Then along came Trump and things changed. They changed so fast most of us can hardly follow. In this week alone the world changed because President Trump is not afraid to say, “America First”.

The Venezuela incident brought us one step closer to telling the communists the game is over. Hopefully, Maduro will start naming names of the American legislators who looked the other way and got paid handsomely. President Trump told the Venezuelans and the world communists: “You can no longer play in the Western American Hemisphere. We don’t want your criminals or your drugs killing our people. We want the oil back that you stole from American companies when you nationalized the oil. We built your infrastructure. America made you rich. We will do it again. We will arrest the international criminal dictator (NOT the President) destroying your country. We hope that you will have a fair election and until that time we will monitor what those in power do. The people will get justice.”

Do you think Maduro’s capture will cause other dictators to flee?

BREAKING: Khamenei Preparing Escape Route to Russia

Iran’s supreme leader reportedly has devised a back-up plan to flee to Moscow as the uprising against the government intensifies and spreads across the country.

According to an intelligence report, Iran’s supreme leader is preparing for the possible collapse of the Islamic regime. He plans to flee the country for Russia with a group of relatives and aides in the event that the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps either fails to crush the ongoing uprising or deserts, Last report, 2 cities were taken by the protestors.

Since that was not enough, Trump turned his sights to America. He told the Defense contractors to stop being such pigs and start investing in their companies to make more products faster. From Truth Social : “All United State Defense Contractors and the Defense Industry as a whole, BEWARE: While we make the best Military Equipment in the World (No other Country is even close!), Defense Contractors are currently issuing massive Dividends to their Shareholders and massive Stock Buybacks at the expense and detriment of investing in Plants and Equipment. This situation will no longer be allowed or tolerated!”

President Trump was not done. He said he will ban large investors from buying single family homes“People live in homes, not corporations,” he said.

Does that affect you? Look at your county Comprehensive plan. See if they are banning Urban Sprawl – a term made up by the socialists to blame property ownership on white people. Ask your county leaders to define Urban Sprawl. Most will not be able to answer.

Definition: Urban Sprawl, the rapid expansion of the geographic extent of cities and towns, often characterized by low-density residential housing, single-use zoning, and increased reliance on the private automobile for transportation. Urban sprawl is caused in part by the need to accommodate a rising urban population; however, in many metropolitan areas it results from a desire for increased living space and other residential amenities. Why else would you want to buy a house? own a car? That is the American Dream

DOES your county want to eliminate single family housing in order to shove you into high density easier to control communities. Mamdani and his new housing administrator want to eliminate private property ownership. It is a “white thing” and white neighborhoods should be taxed more. It is imperative that you pay attention to your local county and stop these plans before you can’t.

Under President Trump’s lead, RFK Jr. is doing a great MAHA job. They just upgraded the health food guidelines and added more protein and dairy. The top of the food pyramid is meat. Yeah. I can smell that steak on the grill. Hopefully the insane overreaching regulations on fertilizer and processing will be eliminated and meat prices will drop.

The administration was also busy on the vaccine side. When I was a child we took 7 vaccines over a period of time. Just like the Defense industry, big Pharma decided that stakeholders and executives deserved more money. So rather that making Americans healthy, they made Americans sick. The administration just slashed the recommended vaccines from over 60 to 11. Plus, the vaccines were recommended but not mandated. Funny how the opposition will slant an article. This report from MSN was a joke.

Everything is connected. The fraud in Minnesota is never ending. Snap, Medicaid unemployment benefits, Feeding our Future, Daycare fraud, NGO’s. I read that Craig’s List had a call for child actors to pose in Daycare facilities. Billions of dollars have been stolen from We The People. Please let us not be naive enough to think this is only happening in Minnesota. It is my hope that those criminal leaders involved will be arrested soon. Have you checked your state for fraud?

Why are democrats fighting to prevent the deportation of criminals? Because they are making money as well. Lt. Michael Byrd, who Shot Ashli Babbitt on Jan. 6, Operates a Taxpayer-Funded Home Daycare as $190 Million in Federal Child Care Funds Flow to Maryland.

I looked for fraud in Florida. I was not really surprised to learn about the dirty politics of the RPOF (Republican Party of Florida). It seems as though the Chairman of the RPOF, Evan Power, is a registered lobbyist with Ramba Consulting.

Of course after learning that, I am not surprised why the RPOF, a private corporation, in charge of supporting GOP candidates, is purging the grassroots from local chapters. In many cases, the refusal to help candidates causes the loss of GOP positions like the Democrat win in the Miami City mayors race. A republican position for over 30 years is now held by a democrat. Who exactly does Evan work for? Certainly not the Florida MAGA, grassroot Republicans. Evan is doing nothing to unite. Does the GOP want to win?

So much has happened this past week I can hardly catch my breath. Join me on this week’s show We will discuss the damage the GOP is doing to Florida with David Kalin in Segment 1. David ran for office and was purged by the RPOF. In segment 2 Ed Vidal will help us understand forgotten history about the true story of Venezuela.

©2026 . All rights reserved.


As always it is imperative that you share and spread the truth. There is so much confusion. Vet your candidates! Check out their actions. Use opensecrets.org to find their donors. What have they done to earn your vote? And above all, VOTE in the Primaries. Is America worth saving?

Guest: David Kalin, Former candidate SOE, Charlotte county

Website: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php/?id=100094156732197

Guest: Ed Vidal, Executive Producer and General Counsel

WSQF 94.5 FM Radio, Doral, Florida

Website: miamiindependent.com

Victor Davis Hanson: Trump’s Jacksonian Foreign Policy [With a Twist]

By The Daily Signal

Editor’s note: This is a lightly edited transcript of today’s video from Daily Signal Senior Contributor Victor Davis Hanson. Subscribe to our YouTube channel to see more of his videos.

This content was recorded by Victor Davis Hanson prior to his Dec. 30 medical operation.

Hello, this is Victor Davis Hanson for The Daily Signal. In the past, I’ve characterized as, Walter Russell Mead, most famously [said], that Trump’s foreign policy is neither interventionist, surely not nation building, nor is it isolationist, as the Left accuses. It was something called Jacksonian. That is, “no better friend, no worse enemy.” “Don’t tread on me.”

At various times if people took advantage of the United States’ desire to live in peace, and they started to push their luck, then we would hit them, overwhelmingly. Sort of what we saw with the two Americans that were tragically killed in Syria. Then there was an overwhelming retaliation.

But I think there’s a quirk to Jacksonianism, a subset. And I would call the Trump Foreign Policy, the Vise Policy. V-I-S-E. Like a vise, that you clamp down on something. By that, I mean, rather than intervene or even use kinetic force, he has another alternative when he sees a renegade country.

Most famously, we saw Iran, that when he came into office, the first thing he did was get back out of the Iran Deal, put back the sanctions, support Israel’s effort to retaliate against Iran.

Although he did take out the nuclear facilities, that was an act that he felt he had no choice, because Iran was reaching a point where they’d have a nuclear weapon. But up until then, he had almost bankrupt, again, by squeezing the Iran economy at no cost to the United States.

We see that much better with Venezuela and the rogue Maduro government. The illegitimate government, that throughout the last elections, in which [Nicolas] Maduro lost, and has been sending shiploads of narcotics to the United States.

It’s using embargoed oil tankers to sell sanctioned oil to Cuba, to China, and, more or less, opened up its jails and mental institutions and sent thousands of people, in spite, to the United States.

So, Trump is now reestablishing the Monroe Doctrine. Remember, Secretary of State John Kerry said that the Monroe Doctrine was pretty much ossified, calcified. Trump has reinstated it. But with a vise policy.

So, sanctions on Maduro. He’s not going to have any income through narco sales. We’re blowing up narco terrorist shipments on the high seas.

He uses that money to bribe officers, bribe the media, bribe the opposition, to stay in power illegitimately. And then, in addition to that, he’ll have no oil income. Venezuela has the largest oil reserves in the world. So, he has a limitless supply of credit and cash. But not if he can’t get it to somewhere.

And, in the Western hemisphere, Trump is showing the world that he just almost automatically reestablished the Monroe Doctrine. What is China going to do? They may say they have a blue-water Navy. They may say they’re catching up. But they’re not there yet. And they have no ability to transmit power, in the Western hemisphere, among our shores.

So, Maduro is in a vise. And we’re squeezing it down, at no cost to us. Is Trump going to invade? I doubt it. Is he going to bomb? I doubt it. I think he’s just slowly going to intimidate Maduro so people within the Venezuelan hierarchy, both legitimate opponents and opportunistic supporters, who feel that he’s a bad investment. And they will throw him out.

EDITOR’S NOTE: Since this commentary was recorded, President Donald Trump did launch a military operation to seize Nicolas Maduro so he could face criminal charges in the United States. What assistance the U.S. had from “legitimate opponents and opportunistic supporters” within Venezuela has not been made known.

The same thing is true of Cuba. We didn’t really know how to deal with Cuba. Since 1959, we’ve had embargoes. Sometimes they’re liquid. Sometimes they’re fluid. They don’t really work. But, more or less, the Castro-ite government in Cuba is an existential enemy of the United States.

We have a lot of people who go there and visit. But the country has never worked. It’s impoverished. And it’s dependent wholly on the legacy of Hugo Chavez and now Maduro, to give them cheap oil. If they don’t get cheap oil, and what do I mean by that?

If Maduro cannot put embargoed oil on sanctioned tankers and get to Cuba, then Cuba’s going to have no ability to distill gasoline, nor will it have energy. And that’s exactly what is happening. The Cuban economy is in a Trump vise.

Are we going to bomb Cuba? No. Are we going to have a Bay of Pigs standoff or invasion? No. Are we going to have a Cuban missile crisis with China? No. We’re going to have a Trump vise. And it’s going to squeeze.

Does this work all the time? No. I mean, it doesn’t work in the case of a full-fledged war, like the Ukraine War or the Middle East, sometimes.

But with other powers in our vicinity or that we have leverage over, we’re going to start to squeeze them, to bring back legitimate government, pro-American governments, and stability for the entire Western hemisphere. And most importantly, a chance for their citizenry to have a normal life.

We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Daily Signal.

AUTHOR

Victor Davis Hanson

Victor Davis Hanson, a senior contributor for The Daily Signal, is a classicist and historian at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University and host of “The Victor Davis Hanson Show.” His website, The Blade of Perseus, features columns, lectures, and exclusive content for subscribers. Contact him at authorvdh@gmail.com. VDH on X: @VDHanson.

U.S. Already Has Wide Berth in Greenland without Possession, Say Experts

By Family Research Council

Fresh from the successful capture of Venezuelan dictator and wanted drug smuggler Nicolás Maduro, the Trump administration has ramped up rhetoric hinting at a possible takeover of Greenland, which is raising alarm among conservatives and NATO allies. Experts say that the U.S. can continue to take advantage of the vast autonomous territory’s natural resources and strategic military locations without wresting away ownership from Denmark.

On Tuesday, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt stated that the Trump administration is exploring a range of options to acquire Greenland, going so far as to say that “utilizing the U.S. military is always an option.” President Trump also contended that “we need Greenland from the standpoint of national security.” The president’s Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller added that the U.S. “should have Greenland as part of the United States,” but declined to say if it should be acquired through military force.

Republican leaders on Capitol Hill were quick to throw cold water on the idea of a military operation to obtain the territory. “No, I don’t think that’s appropriate,” House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) remarked. Senate Armed Services Committee Chair Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) bluntly dismissed the idea, stating, “This is a topic that should be dropped.”

A number of the U.S.’s NATO allies, including Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, and the U.K. quickly issued a statement in response to the idea of a military takeover, stating, “Greenland belongs to its people. It is for Denmark and Greenland, and them only, to decide on matters concerning Denmark and Greenland.” Greenland’s Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen urged the U.S. to proceed with a “respectful dialogue” on the matter.

Greenland, the world’s largest island, has long been considered to be of great strategic importance to the U.S. from a military perspective due to its relative proximity in the Arctic region, missile defense, the ability to control naval shipping routes and chokepoints, and to counter the growing presence of Russia and China in the region. It is also home to vast amounts of untapped rare earth mineral deposits and oil underneath its ice sheet.

Military experts like Brigadier General (Ret.) John Teichert, who formerly served as Assistant Deputy Under Secretary for the Air Force for International Affairs, argue that existing agreements between the U.S. and Denmark already give the U.S. broad leeway in how to utilize the island.

“[W]e get all or almost all of the benefits from Greenland by the partnership we currently have with Greenland and Denmark,” he explained during “Washington Watch with Tony Perkins” Wednesday. “There are economic benefits, there are security benefits, there are diplomatic benefits. And we have a very robust series of mechanisms to allow for collaboration in Greenland, including a U.S. Air Force or Space Force base that we utilize regularly. And I don’t know why now we are threatening, implicitly or explicitly, our friend and our partner in Denmark and Greenland to try to bargain better and get those benefits that were already receiving from that territory.”

As Teichert went on to detail, the partnership is rooted in a Cold War agreement the U.S. signed with Denmark in 1951, which allows America to “construct, install, maintain, and operate” military bases virtually anywhere on the island, including the ability to “house personnel” and “control landings, takeoffs, anchorages, moorings, movements, and operation of ships, aircraft, and waterborne craft.”

“[T]hose mechanisms for collaboration can allow us mutual benefit from the territory by working alongside of our Danish and our Greenlander partners,” the general pointed out. “I reflect back on the U.S. Space Force base that’s already there, the agreement that allows space situational awareness, missile defense, Arctic defense. And I have no doubt that if we ask Denmark and Greenland for an economic collaboration on critical minerals or oil or another base or a series of bases, then we could easily get to yes on that without again threatening our friends and our partners.”

Greenland’s immense mineral and metal deposits will almost certainly prove to be vitally important to the U.S. going forward, since they are used extensively in everything from military fighter jets and electric motors to rechargeable batteries and magnets for electronic devices and vehicles. As highlighted by National Review, harnessing more mineral production will be critical if the U.S. hopes to compete with China. “China now has 70 percent of global rare-earth mining inside its borders, 85 to 90 percent of mineral refining, and more than 90 percent of magnet production,” the outlet noted.

“[T]here are a lot of critical minerals, rare earth metals, and oil that [are] there in the territory,” Teichert observed. “But we have economic agreements with Greenland and Denmark that can allow us the benefit of exploring and exploiting those minerals, metals, and that oil. And there’s no reason why we need to own it to benefit from it. And I think that we could very easily, without threats, pursue opportunities for added collaboration to benefit economically like we already are, but maybe even a larger extent without the threats that we’ve seen in the last few days.”

As Teichert went on to postulate, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s planned meeting with Danish officials next week could go a long way in smoothing things over with America’s European allies.

“I really hope … that they come to some conclusions about the mutual benefit of how we can work together to use Greenland alongside of Denmark and our NATO partners,” he emphasized. “… [T]he president loves the negotiating tactic of keeping all options on the table. And in general, when working against adversaries, that’s wise. You don’t want the adversary to know what you’re not going to do because it simplifies their strategic calculus.”

“But the trust that’s ingrained in this large network of allies and partners allows us to benefit massively and mutually,” he insisted. “And the problem with threats is that we can’t explore the benefits, because now you don’t have the trust that cements the nations together. And I fear that [the] comment[s] from the [administration] [could have] a chilling effect on … the benefits that we get from a close relationship with NATO and allies and partners.”

AUTHOR

Dan Hart

Dan Hart is senior editor at The Washington Stand.

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2026 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

EXCLUSIVE: Conservative Lawmakers Unveil Blueprint to Balance Budget, Execute Trump Agenda

By The Daily Signal

FIRST ON THE DAILY SIGNAL — The Republican Study Committee released a comprehensive blueprint Wednesday for how the 189-member conservative caucus plans to enact President Donald Trump’s agenda while balancing the federal budget within 10 years.

“It is our fiscal responsibility to not only deliver a balanced budget, but get the federal government out of the way to strengthen the economy so families, small businesses, seniors, and farmers can thrive,” Rep. Beth Van Duyne, R-Texas, told The Daily Signal.

In keeping with decades of tradition, the RSC offered its budget proposal early in the year to provide a roadmap for Congress. The plan includes proposals for codifying Trump’s birthright citizenship orderdefunding sanctuary cities, and eliminating wasteful spending on NPR, PBS, and DEI programs.

Despite years of profligate spending during the Biden administration, the proposal manages to cut enough federal largesse to balance the budget in a decade—a long-stated goal of conservatives.

In keeping with Trump’s promise, it does not raise the Social Security retirement age or cut benefits.

“The RSC budget reins in Washington’s out-of-control spending and eliminates waste, fraud, and abuse across all levels of the federal government,” said Van Duyne, who chairs the RSC’s Budget and Spending Task Force. “We are returning to pre-pandemic levels of spending, advancing pro-growth tax policies, slashing regulatory burdens, and unleashing American energy.”

Budget Blueprint

The RSC is the House GOP’s largest caucus, and each year since 1995 it has released its own budget blueprint. This year, it was Van Duyne’s responsibility to collaborate with dozens of other RSC members to prepare the 115-page proposal (see the full document below).

The budget arrives as Republicans saw their margin of control in the U.S. House shrink from 220 to 218 with the death of Rep. Doug LaMalfa, R-Calif., and resignation of Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga. Democrats control 213 seats; there are four vacancies.

Republicans gathered in Washington, D.C., Tuesday to hear from Trump and plot their agenda for 2026. They’ve faced fervent opposition from congressional Democrats, leading to the longest government shutdown in history and setting up another showdown over government spending this month.

Despite those challenges, the RSC helped deliver the votes for the historic reconciliation legislation passed in 2025 that delivered $1.9 trillion in spending reductions and tax relief for American families. The caucus now hopes to build on that success with its latest proposal.

“At its core, the RSC budget is a fundamental rejection of the excessive government spending and regulatory overreach that characterized the Biden Administration’s approach to government,” reads the budget’s introduction.

Immigration and Border Security

The RSC Budget strongly backs Trump’s border security initiatives, which have driven illegal border crossings to new lows. Under the Biden administration, approximately 10,000 unvetted migrants entered the U.S. illegally every day at the southern border. That number dropped to an average of less than 150 per day in 2025.

The proposal funds border wall construction with multiple barrier systems, deploying advanced detection technologies, and substantially expanding the Border Patrol and Immigration and Customs Enforcement through hiring bonuses and retention incentives.

Other immigration-related provision include codifying Trump’s birthright citizenship executive order, defunding sanctuary cities that refuse to cooperate with ICE, expanding interior enforcement and deportations, providing federal grants to border communities, and establishing a State Border Security Reinforcement Fund to offset costs related to illegal immigration.

The RSC also lists 25 bill and policies its members support, including the Laken Riley Act, which was introduced by RSC member Rep. Mike Collins, R-Ga., and became law in January 2025. It requires ICE to detain illegal immigrants who commit theft-related crimes.

Wasteful Spending

The proposal takes aim at what conservatives often consider unnecessary government expenditures.

The RSC budget eliminates all federal funding for National Public Radio and the Public Broadcasting Service.

It repeals statutory authorizations for every diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) program and office across the federal government, building on Trump’s executive actions to end what the budget calls “radical and wasteful government DEI programs.”

The budget eliminates RAISE Grants (formerly TIGER Grants from the Obama era), the Thriving Communities Initiative stemming from Biden’s Justice40 initiative, and federal funding for high-speed rail projects like California’s troubled high-speed rail system.

The proposal eliminates the Interagency Council on Homelessness and reduces funding for the Community Development Block Grant program and rental assistance programs, restructuring them into state formula grants with work requirements for able-bodied adults.

Entitlement Reforms

The budget includes proposals to curtail the ever-increasing spending on entitlement programs, such as undoing Affordable Care Act (ACA) provisions, which lead to the federal government’s spending more on able-bodied Medicaid recipients than on the original population Medicaid was designed for.

Additionally, the budget proposes cost-saving reforms to the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP), such as more strictly enforcing work requirements in the program that are often circumvented and ignored by states.

The budget’s section on Medicare proposes eliminating wasteful spending by cracking down on up-coding, a process by which private providers inflate diagnoses and exaggerate patients’ health risks in order to extract more funding from the federal government.

The budget also calls for completely eliminating the estate tax, commonly called the “death tax,” which the RSC argues particularly harms family farms and small businesses.

National Security

The RSC proposes a balancing act when it comes to defense spending—dramatically expanding America’s capabilities while cutting out anything deemed redundant.

“Every dollar allocated to national defense must be utilized strategically to ensure resources directly support our defense capabilities and mission readiness rather than expanding administrative overhead,” reads the budget proposal.

Specifically, the RSC proposes eliminating programs that duplicate work already conducted in other federal agencies.

For example, the RSC suggests moving “the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program” to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), arguing that the department already performs research of this kind.

Drill, Baby, Drill

RSC Chairman August Pfluger and budget chief Van Duyne are both Texans, and that shows in their budget’s emphasis on increased energy access as an economic boost.

“The Biden administration was asleep at the wheel as their policies reduced wages, raised prices, and distorted market signals,” reads the section on “Unleashing American Energy.”

The energy section takes a more celebratory tone, highlighting how the July budget reconciliation bill undid many of the anti-fossil fuel regulations and green energy subsidies established by former President Joe Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act.

After applauding Trump’s executive orders to allow for increased drilling, the budget calls for further deregulation to speed up the industry.

“Our allies abroad are waiting for the United States to unleash American energy production,” reads the budget. “The RSC Budget supports policies that decrease the capital costs of producing energy on federal lands, rather than disincentivize energy producers.”

AUTHORS

RELATED POSTS:

In Congress, Former State Treasurers Aim to Manage Budget Better

GOP Congressman Exposes Practice That Makes Congress ‘Crooked as a Dog’s Leg’

Congress Should Prioritize American Graduates, Not Foreigners Who Promised to Go Home

EXCLUSIVE: GOP Rep. Pushes Bill To Codify Trump’s Vow To Keep Big Investors From Snatching Up Homes

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Signal column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


The Daily Signal depends on the support of readers like you. Donate now

Mamdani’s Rent Czar Breaks Down When Asked About Mother’s Reportedly $1.6M Tennessee Home

By The Daily Caller

A senior aide in New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s administration grew visibly upset when asked about her mother reportedly owning a home worth millions.

Cea Weaver, a far-left activist who heads Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s Office to Protect Tenants, apparently teared up and ran down the street when reporters — including one from the Daily Mail — approached her outside her Brooklyn apartment Wednesday morning, according to a Daily Mail report.

Weaver was asked about her mother, Celia Applegate, who reportedly owns a home in Nashville, Tennessee. Through tears, Weaver replied, “No,” declining to comment, before quickly retreating back inside her building, according to the report.

The encounter has drawn attention to Weaver’s past statements criticizing private property ownership. She has previously argued that owning private property perpetuates “white supremacy” — despite her own mother, a professor of German Studies at Vanderbilt University, who owns a Craftsman home worth $1.6 million, the New York Post reported, citing records.

In a 2019 post on X (then Twitter), she wrote, “Private property including and kind of ESPECIALLY homeownership is a weapon of white supremacy masquerading as ‘wealth building’ public policy,” according to screenshots.

However, at the time Weaver sent the post, her professor mother had already been the owner of a 3,400-square-foot home in Nashville for seven years.

Applegate and her partner bought their home for $814,000 in 2012, and its value has since doubled to $1.6 million, according to property records cited by the New York Post.

NYC’s Tenant Director, Cea Weaver:

“People like home ownership because they like control, which is rooted in a racist and classist society”

“This is why rent control is important” pic.twitter.com/1zQ1NL0ZxY

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) January 6, 2026

Weaver’s past criticism of homeownership resurfaced Monday in a viral X thread by writer Michelle Tandler, which featured more than a dozen screenshots from Weaver’s now-deleted account dating from 2016 to 2022.

Beyond her social media activity, several of Weaver’s earlier remarks opposing private property ownership were also captured on video.

“I think the reality is, is that for centuries we’ve really treated property as an individualized good and not a collective good,” she said, adding that “transitioning to treating it as a collective good and towards a model of shared equity will require that we think about it differently,” Weaver said in the 2021 YouTube video for the NYC Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), an organization to which both she and Mamdani belong.

Now that the backlash has ignited over her blatant hypocrisy, Cea Weaver now says of her insane “home ownership is a weapon of white supremacy” comments:

“Some of those things are certainly not how I would say things today.”

These commies, LOL https://t.co/ZDTx70JFnb pic.twitter.com/ohAiXLwK4y

— Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) January 7, 2026

“And it will mean that families, especially white families but some POC [people of color] families who are homeowners as well, are gonna have a different relationship to property than the one that we currently have,” Weaver added in the video.

After the posts resurfaced and circulated widely online, the Mamdani official described her past remarks as “regretful.”

“Regretful comments from years ago do not change what has always been clear — my commitment to making housing affordable and equitable for New York’s renters,” Weaver said in a Tuesday statement to The New York Times, released by Mamdani’s press office.

AUTHOR

Ashley Brasfield

Reporter

RELATED ARTICLES:

Turns Out Mamdani Rent Czar’s Own Mom May Be ‘White Supremacist’ According To Her Logic

Mamdani Team Member’s Full Blown Public Meltdown Only Scratching The Surface

Ayanna Pressley Screams At Top Of Her Lungs As Somali Fraud Hearing Descends Into Mayhem

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Trump Admin Withdrawing From ‘Anti-American’ Global Climate Change Regimes

By The Daily Caller

The White House announced Wednesday that the U.S. is exiting 66 international organizations and treaties, including a landmark climate change entity joined in 1992.

The Trump administration found that the listed international organizations, conventions and treaties did not serve America’s interests. Notable exits pertaining to global efforts to combat climate change include two United Nations entities: the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), the last of which the U.S. joined in 1992 under President George H.W. Bush.

“Today, President Trump announced the U.S. is leaving 66 anti-American, useless, or wasteful international organizations. Review of additional international organizations remains ongoing,” Secretary of State Marco Rubio wrote on X Wednesday. “These withdrawals keep a key promise President Trump made to Americans — we will stop subsidizing globalist bureaucrats who act against our interests. The Trump Administration will always put America and Americans first.”

Today, President Trump announced the U.S. is leaving 66 anti-American, useless, or wasteful international organizations. Review of additional international organizations remains ongoing.

These withdrawals keep a key promise President Trump made to Americans – we will stop…

— Secretary Marco Rubio (@SecRubio) January 8, 2026

The presidential memorandum notes that the exits follow a February 2025 executive order and subsequent recommendations from the Secretary of State.

“I have considered the Secretary of State’s report and, after deliberating with my Cabinet, have determined that it is contrary to the interests of the United States to remain a member of, participate in, or otherwise provide support to the organizations listed,” the presidential memorandum reads.

Notably, Trump signed an executive order to exit the Paris Agreement under the UNFCCC on his first day back in the Oval Office, The Paris Agreement is a global climate change compact marked by a pledge to lower emissions.

The Wednesday announcement also said the U.S. will leave the Intergovernmental Forum on Mining, Minerals, Metals, and Sustainable Development, the International Energy Forum, U.N. Energy and the U.N. Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women.

“For United Nations entities, withdrawal means ceasing participation in or funding to those entities to the extent permitted by law,” the announcement said.

AUTHOR

Audrey Streb

DCNF Energy Reporter

RELATED ARTICLE: Paris Agreement Ten Years Later: ‘Failed’

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.