Two Dozen U.S. Soldiers Injured in Iran-Backed Attacks Last Week thumbnail

Two Dozen U.S. Soldiers Injured in Iran-Backed Attacks Last Week

By Jihad Watch

The ayatollahs are getting impatient that their $6 billion check hasn’t arrived.

The ayatollahs are getting impatient that their $6 billion check hasn’t arrived in the mail. And they do like celebrating the 40th anniversary of their great triumph… the Marine Barracks bombing.

So they spent a little time trying to kill American soldiers. Again.

At least two-dozen American military personnel based in Iraq and Syria were injured in drone attacks last week that officials said were launched by Iran-backed proxy groups.

The largest attack carried out against a US base was on Oct. 18 when 20 troops suffered “minor injuries,” after numerous one-way drones targeted al-Tanf Garrison in southeastern Syria, US military officials said, according to the Washington Post.

On the same day, multiple drones also targeted the US and its allies in two different attacks on Ain al-Asad Air Base in western Iraq that left four people with minor injuries, the Washington Post reported. Those injured also returned to duty.

A US citizen working as a contractor died the same day after he went into cardiac arrest during a shelter-in-place order at the base.

The Pentagon has said the groups behind the attacks are supported by Iran and its Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

It’s natural to assume that this is a response to the current situation in the region, but the depressing thing is that it’s not even new.

The two elements that jump out at most people (1. Iran launching attacks on U.S. bases and (2. the White House not even mentioning it… have been around for quite a while.

Here’s my article on it from Jan 2022.

Two more terror drones targeted American forces deployed to fight ISIS at the Al Asad air base. The base has been repeatedly hammered by Iran-backed rocket attacks over the past year, most notably when 14 rockets struck the base over the summer causing several injuries.

There were repeated Iran-backed rocket strikes against Americans in Iraq throughout the last year totaling an estimated 25 separate attacks under the Biden administration.

On September 11, two drones launched an attack on U.S. forces at Erbil International Airport.

Then, as now, the Biden administration limited American military personnel to defensive preventative air strikes against the Shiite terror groups carrying out the attacks.

This was going on long before the current Hamas attack and the Israeli response. Or before we directed more forces to the region.

American soldiers have been killed and worse still, we’re funding their killers. And I don’t just mean with that $6 billion.

While some U.S. conflicts with Jihadists in the region are old news, Kataeb Hezbollah fired rockets at the U.S. embassy in Baghdad in 2019, and has bombed U.S. bases in recent years. Kataeb Hezbollah killed two American soldiers in 2020: Army Spc. Juan Miguel Mendez Covarrubias and Air Force Staff Sgt. Marshal D. Roberts.

Politicians and the media have mostly ignored the fact that Americans are continuing to be killed in Iraq, that the Iraqi government is funding their killers, and that we’re funding Iraq.

While Iraq funds Iran’s terror militias, the United States funds the UN Development Programme to “stabilize” Iraq and has invested over $100 million into “conflict, peace and security” funding.

The United States has spent over $1 billion financing the nation’s military while Iraq spends billions financing the Iranian PMU terror militias which are expected to approach a quarter of million Jihadis.

Did you hear any mention of Air Force Staff Sgt. Marshal D. Roberts?

On March 14, 2020, Roberts lost his life when enemy fire engaged with his unit at Camp Taji. With rockets flying, Roberts and his friend took cover. They discussed running to a bunker but not without considering if they could make it to safety. Roberts told his fellow Airmen to go and get her body armor. As his friend left, a rocket landed, taking his life. In losing his own, Roberts saved another.

Her body armor.

Do we talk about any of this? No. And then suddenly we notice it and wonder what’s going on. Iran keeps attacking us and trying to kill us. And Biden keeps trying to cut a deal while warning against offending Iran.

AUTHOR

DANIEL GREENFIELD

RELATED ARTICLES:

Biden regime has sent over $1,000,000,000 to UN agency described as ‘effectively a branch of Hamas’

Hamas documents show that the jihadis intentionally targeted elementary schools and a youth center

Hamas Is Keeping 500,000 Liters of Fuel

Islamic State jihadis are traveling from Turkey to Georgia and rebuilding the group there

The 92nd Street Y Sets A Limit to the Idiocy it Will Tolerate

Hamas actor pretends to be dying in hospital, then is miraculously healed and making videos the next day

UC Berkeley: Students can get extra credit for attending a pro-jihad march

Colorado: Imam teaches children at mosque that Jews can’t be trusted, Allah turned them into monkeys

RELATED TWEET ON X:

American forces are under continued attack by Iran-backed terrorists, yet Biden is off to his Delaware retreat for ANOTHER vacation. Biden has spent 392 days — almost 39% of his presidency — on vacation. pic.twitter.com/0oo01CV4p3

— Sean Hannity 🇺🇸 (@seanhannity) October 28, 2023

RELATED VIDEO: Video on Middle East reality- Message to anti-Israel activists in the West

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

‘Significant Escalation’: Iranian Proxies Target U.S. Military Bases in Middle East thumbnail

‘Significant Escalation’: Iranian Proxies Target U.S. Military Bases in Middle East

By Family Research Council

U.S. forces in the Middle East have come under attack 13 times in the past week, a Pentagon spokesman confirmed Tuesday, and the attacks have injured at least two dozen military personnel. U.S. Air Force Brigadier General Pat Ryder said the Pentagon held Iran responsible for the attacks and warned of “the prospect for more significant escalation against U.S. forces and personnel across the region in the very near-term.”

“Between October 17th and the 24th, U.S. and coalition forces have been attacked at least 10 separate times in Iraq and three separate times in Syria via a mix of one-way attack drones and rockets,” Ryder explained at a Pentagon press briefing Tuesday.

At least 24 American military personnel were wounded in the attacks, U.S. Central Command told NBC News, and a civilian contractor died of cardiac arrest during a shelter-in-place order, which turned out to be a false alarm. On October 18, two drones targeted al-Tanf military base in southern Syria, injuring 20 military personnel and destroying a hangar housing small aircraft. The same day, two separate drone attacks at al-Asad base in western Iraq wounded four military personnel.

The U.S. military maintains a small presence on the ground in Syria and Iraq to deter a resurgence of the Islamic State. There are approximately 900 U.S. troops in Syria and approximately 2,500 U.S. troops in Iraq.

The Islamic Resistance in Iraq, a loose confederacy of Iran-backed militias, claimed responsibility for the attack on al-Tanf base.

On October 19, a U.S. Navy ship in the Red Sea intercepted and shot down four cruise missiles and 14 drones launched by the Iran-backed Houthi militia, based in Yemen. “We cannot say for certain what these missiles and drones were targeting but they were launched from Yemen heading north along the Red Sea potentially to targets in Israel,” Ryder reported last week.

“We know that the groups conducting these attacks are supported by the IRGC [Iran Revolutionary Guard Corps] and the Iranian regime,” Ryder said Tuesday. “What we are seeing is the prospect for more significant escalation against U.S. forces and personnel across the region in the very near-term coming from Iranian proxy forces and ultimately from Iran.”

“We’ve already deployed a significant number of additional U.S. military capabilities into the region to bolster our regional deterrence efforts, strengthen our capabilities there and enhance our ability to respond to a range of contingencies,” Ryder told the press.

Since Hamas terrorists invaded Israel and slaughtered more than 1,400 Israelis on October 7, the U.S. military has sent two aircraft carrier groups and extra fighter squadrons to the eastern Mediterranean Sea, near the zone of conflict. Other units stationed at U.S. military bases have received orders to prepare to deploy.

However, Ryder declined to say whether the U.S. military was planning any counterstrikes on Iran-allied targets. “We will do everything necessary to protect and defend our forces,” he stated. “If and when we would decide to respond, we will do so at a time and place of our choosing.”

“Since that Hamas terrorist attack, we’ve also been crystal clear that we do not want to see the situation in Israel widen into a broader regional conflict,” Ryder explained.

“That conflict has started,” Family Research Council President Tony Perkins insisted on “Washington Watch.” “We’ve seen our own troops in Syria and Iraq being attacked by those that are funded and supported by Iran.”

In the meantime, Israeli forces have clashed with Iran-backed militants near the northern border with Lebanon, at sea near the Gaza Strip, and in the West Bank, where The Wall Street Journal reported that the Islamic Jihad has strengthened its position, armed by weapons smuggled from Iran. Israel on Wednesday conducted airstrikes on enemy positions in Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon, and Syria.

Perkins lamented the Biden administration’s “schizophrenic foreign policy, stating, “we fund Palestinian Authority, Hamas, who attacks Israel. … We release money to Iran. They then attack our allies. This makes absolutely no sense.”

On “Washington Watch,” Rep. Greg Steube (R-Fla.) responded that the Biden administration has been pursuing an “appeasement” policy toward Iran. “You can’t have an appeasement position … against a terrorist regime. You have to stand strong like the Trump administration did.”

“The increasing tempo of attacks on U.S. positions and the vital assets of its regional partners is reminiscent of a similar campaign Iran embarked upon in 2019,” noted National Review Senior Writer Noah Rothman. “Then as now, the president was reluctant to respond directly to those attacks for fear that such a response would provoke a wider regional war.”

But, Rothman added, “the provocations did not end until the United States responded disproportionately with the strike that neutralized Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps commander Qasem Soleimani.”

President Biden’s term in office has been punctuated by foreign policy crises, including America’s controversial 2021 withdrawal from Afghanistan, Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine, and Hamas’s 2023 terror attack on Israel. “You didn’t see any of these wars, any of these type of attacks when [Trump] was president because he was strong on foreign policy,” Steube pointed out. “We have a weak Joe Biden in the White House that doesn’t stand for anything but appeasing our enemies.”

AUTHOR

Joshua Arnold

Joshua Arnold is a senior writer at The Washington Stand.

RELATED ARTICLE: Senator to Biden: ‘You Can’t Be Pro-Israel and Pro-Iran. You Have to Choose.’

RELATE TWEET ON X:

🚨 BREAKING: The U.S. has carried out multiple air strikes against Iranian proxies in Syria. pic.twitter.com/hpmezsLPHM

— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) October 27, 2023

RELATED VIDEO: Video: Inside Hamas’s underground city: Footage shows how the terrorists excavate tunnels, use them to move weapons, carry out attacks on Israel and smuggle prisoners back to Gaza

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2023 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

Senator to Biden: ‘You Can’t Be Pro-Israel and Pro-Iran. You Have to Choose.’ thumbnail

Senator to Biden: ‘You Can’t Be Pro-Israel and Pro-Iran. You Have to Choose.’

By Family Research Council

A month ago, the idea of U.S. troops doing live-fire exercises in Iraq would have seemed like something out of 2002. But almost three weeks removed from one of the bloodiest days in the modern Middle East, war is closer than it’s ever been. With more than 18 separate attacks launched at American soldiers last week, it’s clear: Israel is no longer the only target.

“My warning to [Iran],” President Biden said Wednesday, was “be prepared.” “If they continue to move against those troops, we will respond.” Whether the Ayatollah takes the message seriously is anyone’s guess. After all, Senator Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) pointed out, it’s not like this White House’s position has been one of strength.

“Iran does not know if this president has any red lines,” the Kansan argued on “Washington Watch,” “and I’m afraid that they could be right. And that’s why I’m saying we need to retaliate and teach them a lesson. We need to hit the bully across the nose really hard the next time they do anything whatsoever. As long as we have ships in harm’s way, which we do, it’s very possible that one of those drones or one of those underwater attacks get through. So of course, I’m very, very concerned about the situation there.”

And it’s not just Republicans who are sounding the alarm. After 24 Americans were wounded on bases in Iraq and Syria, hard-core Democrats like Senator Chris Coons from the president’s own state have expressed frustration with Biden’s lack of spine. “There needs to be pressure back against Iran,” he insisted to Fox News’s Bret Baier. “… Iran funded, supplied, and trained the fighters of Hamas and is behind these other proxies that are in the north of Israel, in the south of Lebanon, in Yemen, on the Arabian Peninsula, in Iraq. So, we need to be striking back — and we need to be prepared for the very real prospect that this will get harder before it gets easier.”

In conversations with some of the Syrian rebel commanders, Biden’s weakness is only feeding Iran’s aggression. “There has been absolutely no response to these attacks,” one told a Washington Post reporter, “which has resulted in the fact that the Iranian-backed militias are getting much braver.”

Much as this White House has tried, you can’t be “pro-Israel and pro-Iran,” Marshall insisted. “You have to choose one or the other.” But if we think back to what’s happened under Biden, the senator explained, “… [H]e’s empowered their nuclear weapon program. He’s unfrozen this $6 billion [dollars] … three months ago. He unfroze $10 billion [dollars]. And he’s now allowing them to sell $1 billion [dollars] of oil every week.” Under this administration, Iran’s reserves have climbed from $6 billion dollars to $60 billion dollars.

“This is what’s happening under Joe Biden’s watch,” Marshall shook his head. “He’s allowed Iran to once again be a force, to be a power. And again … You have to choose Israel or you have to choose Iran. Iran is the one that says, ‘Death to Israel. Death to America.’”

If Biden doesn’t act, Family Research Council President Tony Perkins asked, could we see this escalate into a “global conflict?”

“Absolutely,” Marshall answered. “We’re [all] looking [for] some type of clarity from this president, some type of priorities. [No one understands] what the president’s priorities [are] under this situation. To me, the priorities should be very, very clear. Number one, we want to get all the Americans back safely. We need to secure our southern border. By the way, we need to cut the head off the snake of Iran, and we need to eliminate Hamas. … We need a president who’s going to put our first, our best, best foot forward to stand with peace through strength.”

Frankly, Perkins pointed out, “I wish this president had the same clarity on issues such as this, as he does for abortion, the whole LGBTQ agenda, and climate change. [Those seem] to be the only three issues this administration has clarity on. It’s frightening.”

And look, the senator replied, we’re not “warmongers.” “I don’t want this war,” he admitted. “But let’s face it — over the next days, weeks, and months, it’s going to get really ugly there in the Gaza Strip. And Israel needs to know that we have their back, that unequivocally we’re going to stand with them.”

AUTHOR

Suzanne Bowdey

Suzanne Bowdey serves as editorial director and senior writer at The Washington Stand.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Terrorist Found With Instructions to Remove Heads, Hearts of Jews

‘Significant Escalation’: Iranian Proxies Target U.S. Military Bases in Middle East

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2023 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

Clarion Re-Releases Its Documentaries About Hamas, Iran and Foreign Funding thumbnail

Clarion Re-Releases Its Documentaries About Hamas, Iran and Foreign Funding

By Clarion Project

The American public is watching as violent pro-Palestinian demonstrations around the country celebrate the murder, capture, and torture of Israeli citizens by Hamas terrorists.

Americans are watching in horror as our own communities are once again falling victim to acts of homegrown Islamic terror.

Who is Hamas? Where did they come from? What drives their unquenchable thirst for terror? How are they impacting America?

The Clarion Project is re-releasing three critically acclaimed documentaries that answer these questions. We would like to help your viewers understand the truth.

Press kits for these documentaries can be downloaded from this folder:

Kids: Chasing Paradise follows the stories of activists working to save children from Islamist extremism and radicalization. Interviews include trainees in a Hamas terrorist training camp.

Iranium details the dangers of an Iranian nuclear threat. With Iran literally on the brink of nuclear capability, this film is more timely today than ever before.

Obsession exposes the threat of radical Islam to Western civilization.

Covert Cash: What American Universities Don’t Want You to Know About Their Foreign Funding exposes the billions of dollars flowing into U.S. universities from countries hostile to American values and democracy.

We urge you to screen these films widely and repeatedly across your platform so that your viewers are educated and armed with the information that will help them counteract the vitriolic ideology that is once again turning America’s communities and streets into unsafe places for our citizens.

To receive the film files, schedule interviews, or request more information, please email me and I will get you what you need immediately.

We have no time to waste. The American public must know who we are dealing with. You can show them the answers.

Respectfully yours,

Richard Green
CEO, Clarion Project

©2023. The Clarion Project. All rights reserved.

Here Are the 10 Monsters in Congress Who Voted AGAINST Condemning Hamas’ Savagery thumbnail

Here Are the 10 Monsters in Congress Who Voted AGAINST Condemning Hamas’ Savagery

By The Geller Report

This is not hard. There is no ambiguity here. Any one who supports the unimaginable savagery by Hamas monsters is as evil as the acts themselves.

These notorious Jew-hating Democrats voted against the resolution to condemn Hamas many of whom have been criticized for their support of jihad terror and criticism of Israel’s response to the attacks.

Jihadi Representatives:

  1. Rashida Tlaib of Michigan
  2. Ilhan Omar of Minnesota
  3. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York
  4. Cori Bush of Missouri
  5. Jamaal Bowman of New York
  6. Andre Carson of Indiana
  7. Al Green of Texas
  8. Summer Lee of Pennsylvania
  9. Delia Ramirez of Illinois 

And one terrible jihadi Republican, #10 Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky.

House Passes Resolution Condemning Hamas For ‘Unprovoked War On Israel

By: Daily Caller, October 28, 2023:

The House of Representatives overwhelmingly passed a resolution in support of Israel on Wednesday following terrorist attacks on the country by Hamas that began on Oct. 7.

House Resolution 771, titled “Standing with Israel as it defends itself against the barbaric war launched by Hamas and other terrorists,” condemns Hamas for beginning an “unprovoked war on Israel” and accuses them of “slaughtering Israelis and abducting hostages in towns in southern Israel, including children and the elderly.” After the House elected Republican Rep. Mike Johnson of Louisiana’s 4th District as its speaker following a three-week deadlock over the position, the resolution was quickly brought to the floor under a motion to suspend the rules, which required a two-thirds majority to approve.

“Resolved, That the House of Representatives — (1) stands with Israel as it defends itself against the barbaric war launched by Hamas and other terrorists; (2) reaffirms Israel’s right to self-defense; (3) condemns Hamas’ brutal war against Israel; (4) calls on all countries to unequivocally condemn Hamas’ brutal war against Israel,” the resolution’s text says. An overwhelming majority of 412 members voted in favor of the resolution, while ten voted against it, with six voting present.

Text of H.R. 771 by Daily Caller News Foundation on Scribd:

Text of H.R. 771 by Daily Caller News Foundation

The bipartisan resolution was introduced by Republican Rep. Mike McCaul of Texas’ 10th District, who also serves as chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee. Members applauded the passage of the resolution after the vote count was announced by the chair, the Daily Caller News Foundation observed from the galleries of the House.

“This was one of the darkest moments in the history of the state of Israel,” McCaul said during a debate on the House floor about the resolution, the DCNF observed. “[Hamas] must be confronted with zero equivocation … [this resolution] condemns Hamas in the strongest possible terms and reaffirms America’s support for the State of Israel.”

Those who opposed the resolution included Democratic Reps. Rashida Tlaib of Michigan, Ilhan Omar of Minnesota, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, Cori Bush of Missouri and Jamaal Bowman of New York — some of whom have been criticized by Democrats for their apparent support for Gaza and criticism of Israel’s response to the attacks. One Republican, Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, voted against the resolution.

Keep reading.

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

RELATED ARTICLES:

Western Leftist Elites Cheer Unutterable Butchery, Bloodlust and Islamic Jew Hatred

Mamet: “How the Democrats Betrayed the Jews”

REPORT: Jihad Rep. Rashida Tlaib’s Connections To Hamas Terrorist Organization

Knife-Wielding Jew Hater Breaks Into Jewish Family’s Home in L.A., Shouting “Kill Them,” “Free Palestine”

Jewish Students Forced to Barricade Themselves In Library as Muslim and Leftist Jew-Hating Mob Try to Break Down the Door New York’s Cooper Union College

RELATED TWEETS ON X:

66 years ago the President activated the 101st Airborne to protect black students going to class. Are we going to have to do the same for Jewish students on today’s college campuses? pic.twitter.com/bj7e0Obi2l

— Josh Hawley (@HawleyMO) October 26, 2023

Rashida Tlaib is an anti-Semite, pro-Hamas, and led an insurrection into the Capitol complex.

Every member of Congress will be on record. Including every Democrat.

Will they condemn Rashida Tlaib’s hatred or support her sympathy for terrorists? pic.twitter.com/vRBjGlH3Hz

— Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸 (@RepMTG) October 26, 2023

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

THE WAR ON X: WW III • The Global War Against Islamic Terrorism — Day 20 thumbnail

THE WAR ON X: WW III • The Global War Against Islamic Terrorism — Day 20

By Dr. Rich Swier

Today is October 27th, the 20th day of the The Global War Against Islamic Terrorism.

Today the war has expanded and it is now going on from the Halls of the U.S. Congress, gone globally in dozens of cities with pro-Israel and pro-Hamas rallies, to the actual fighting in the Middle East in Israel, Syria and Gaza.

Here’s a glimpse of what is happening in the United States of America.

BREAKING🚨 @RepMTG just introduced a resolution to censure Rashida Tlaib as privileged to force a House vote in two legislative days.

Tlaib led a pro-Hamas insurrection into the Capitol complex, has repeatedly displayed her anti-Semitic beliefs, and shown her hatred for Israel. pic.twitter.com/RAa9kfKp3O

— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) October 26, 2023

The U.S. House of Representatives overwhelmingly passed a resolution condemning Hamas for it’s ‘unprovoked War on Israel’.

The U.S. Senate followed suit.

Senate Finally Passes Josh Hawley’s Resolution Condemning Anti-Semitism on Campuses https://t.co/WIJ4HrBERZ

— Josh Hawley (@HawleyMO) October 26, 2023

U.S. Senator Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) said to Biden “you can’t be pro-Israel and pro-Iran. You have to choose.”

Florida’s Governor Ron DeSantis shut down the terror-linked “Students for Justice in Palestine.”

The New York Times begrudgingly admitted it was wrong about the Gaza hospital attack. It wasn’t Israel it was Hamas who hit the hospital with a rocket.

Then there is this response to American colleges and universities, e.g. Columbia University, hosting pro-Hamas rallies.

🚨Billionaire Leon Cooperman who has donated $50 Million to Columbia University announces he is suspending his giving after the school refused to fire a professor who called the Hamas attacks “awesome”

“I think these kids at the colleges have SH*T for brains” pic.twitter.com/9foHZR1Qar

— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) October 26, 2023

Rashida Tlaib is an anti-Semite, pro-Hamas, and led an insurrection into the Capitol complex.

Every member of Congress will be on record. Including every Democrat.

Will they condemn Rashida Tlaib’s hatred or support her sympathy for terrorists? pic.twitter.com/vRBjGlH3Hz

— Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸 (@RepMTG) October 26, 2023

It appears the tide is turning against Iran and its proxy Hamas.

WW III • The Global War Against Islamic Terrorism — Day 20

IDF fighter jets carried out a precise air strike based on IDF and ISA intelligence and eliminated the Commander of Hamas’ Northern Khan Yunis Rockets Array, Hassan Al-Abdullah. pic.twitter.com/HrDD4DXAU2

— Israel Defense Forces (@IDF) October 26, 2023

London is no longer a safe city. What’s even happening here? pic.twitter.com/8XFpykbQ8Z

— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) October 26, 2023

Good day to everyone except for Hamas. #HamasIsISIS pic.twitter.com/HV9MIvB3Rw

— Hananya Naftali (@HananyaNaftali) October 26, 2023

Madhath Mubashar—Commander of Hamas’ Western Khan Yunis Battalion—was eliminated by an IDF aerial strike.

Furthermore, the IDF struck 250+ Hamas targets including a terrorist tunnel network in Gaza that detonated the secondary explosions. pic.twitter.com/qaB5J0np2G

— Israel Defense Forces (@IDF) October 27, 2023

OPERATIONAL UPDATE: The IDF conducted strikes on Hamas terrorist targets over the last 24 hours.

IDF ground troops, fighter jets and UAVs struck:

🔴 Anti-tank missile launch sites
🔴 Command & control centers
🔴 Hamas terrorist operatives

The troops exited the area and no… pic.twitter.com/yNdiY6XTby

— Israel Defense Forces (@IDF) October 27, 2023

Based on precise IDF and ISA intelligence, IDF fighter jets struck 3 senior Hamas operatives in the Daraj Tuffah Battalion.

The battalion’s operatives played a significant role in the invasion and murderous attack against Israel on October 7, and is considered to be the most… pic.twitter.com/WOnmE2Cv3O

— Israel Defense Forces (@IDF) October 26, 2023

🇮🇱 HAPPENING NOW: Thousands of U.S. Marines Just Landed in Israel ⚠️

🚨 WW3 HIGH ALERT 🚨 pic.twitter.com/A3sPgGCxKJ

— Matt Wallace (@MattWallace888) October 26, 2023

Istanbul. 2023. pic.twitter.com/TBHZ9I3G4K

— The Mossad: Satirical, Yet Awesome (@TheMossadIL) October 26, 2023

These words will never compare to the torture and pain many victims underwent.

This is a testimony from a volunteer in Zaka—Israel’s disaster victim identification organization—regarding the Oct. 7 massacre. pic.twitter.com/sn2Kjiwcvn

— Israel Defense Forces (@IDF) October 26, 2023

Yousef Palani, a Muslim Iraqi refugee who was settled in Ireland with his large family, was sentenced to two life sentences for butchering two gay men in Sligo, Ireland. One man was decapitated. A third who was stabbed in the face, losing his eye, survived. Palani told police he… pic.twitter.com/9wipsLttKa

— Andy Ngô 🏳️‍🌈 (@MrAndyNgo) October 26, 2023

66 years ago the President activated the 101st Airborne to protect black students going to class. Are we going to have to do the same for Jewish students on today’s college campuses? pic.twitter.com/bj7e0Obi2l

— Josh Hawley (@HawleyMO) October 26, 2023

©2023. Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Female Battalion of IDF Eliminates 100 Terrorists

Here Are Hamas Documents That Instruct to Kill, take Hostage Civilians, Take Over Towns Villages, Schools, Youth Centers

Los Angeles: Man tries to break into Jewish family’s home, screams ‘Kill Jews’ and ‘Free Palestine’

NYC: Jewish students locked into college library to protect them from raging pro-Hamas mob

Austria: Afghan Muslim migrant beats his sister because she goes to school

Hamas note cited early Islamic massacres as inspiration, called on Muslims to behead Jews

Hamas, Hezb’allah and Islamic Jihad top dogs meet to plot course to ‘real victory’ over Israel

Here Are the Monsters in Congress Who Voted AGAINST Condemning Hamas Savagery

The Religion of Global Climate Change thumbnail

The Religion of Global Climate Change

By The Catholic Thing

Michael Pakaluk: Laudate Deum consistently turns qualified statements about the world into certainties appropriate only for articles of faith.  Unlike a truly scientific discussion, it does not review counter-objections or conflicting evidence.  


My worry about Laudate Deum (“all you praise God”), the recent Apostolic Exhortation “to all people of good will on the climate crisis,” is that because it represents an incursion into the domain of the laity, it implicitly converts a matter of prudence, which always involves an awareness of trade-offs, into a matter of faith.

I take my doctrine on the laity from Vatican II.  In Lumen gentium, bishops are accorded the role of defining doctrine in faith and morals.  Their specific competence in this task “extends as far as the deposit of Revelation extends.” (n. 25)  The laity in contrast are tasked with applying these principles to the world: “laity, by their very vocation, seek the kingdom of God by engaging in temporal affairs and by ordering them according to the plan of God.” (n. 31)  “By divine institution Holy Church is ordered and governed with a wonderful diversity,” the Council Fathers exclaim. (n. 32)

One would think that this genuine diversity, in the matter of the climate, would imply a division of labor: the bishops set down general principles drawn from the deposit of faith; and the laity, using their specific competencies, consider how most prudently to apply them.  Lumen gentium imagines teamwork in the Church, in outline working like this.

But in Laudate Deum the Catholic laity do not make an appearance.  What one finds instead is teamwork between the Holy See and an association of scientists, the “Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change” (IPCC), with a short-circuiting of the laity.  (Perhaps teamwork is not propitious in the face of emergencies.)

At the same time, the relatively cautious statements of that quasi-scientific body are converted into certainties.  Consider the contrasts.  The Exhortation at one place asserts this:

we know that every time the global temperature increases by 0.5° C, the intensity and frequency of great rains and floods increase in some areas and severe droughts in others, extreme heat waves in some places and heavy snowfall in others.

“We know.” What I know, I cannot be wrong about.  It makes no sense to say, “I know that my keys are on the nightstand, but I may be wrong.”  Rather, one should say, “I believe.” Thus, “we know” implies certainty and the exclusion of doubt.

So on what basis do we “know” this? The Exhortation cites the 2021 IPPC report (B.2.2), which reads:

every additional 0.5° C of global warming causes clearly discernible increases in the intensity and frequency of hot extremes, including heatwaves (very likely), and heavy precipitation (high confidence), as well as agricultural and ecological droughts in some regions (high confidence). Discernible changes in intensity and frequency of meteorological droughts, with more regions showing increases than decreases, are seen in some regions for every additional 0.5°C of global warming (medium confidence). Increases in frequency and intensity of hydrological droughts become larger with increasing global warming in some regions (medium confidence). There will be an increasing occurrence of some extreme events unprecedented in the observational record with additional global warming, even at 1.5°C of global warming. Projected percentage changes in frequency are larger for rarer events (high confidence).

In IPCC lingo, “very likely” means a probability of at least 90 percent based on their models.  The number has no validity beyond the validity of their models.  We do not know the probability that their models are correct.  While “medium confidence” is a qualitative term meaning some (but not all) experts agree, and there is moderately strong evidence in favor.   Thus, we see that a measured statement in the IPCC report, which certainly leaves room for doubt, is converted by Laudate Deum into a certainty.   And the IPCC paragraph says nothing about snow, and it says that heat waves might be more frequent, not more extreme.

Quibbles, these last, perhaps – but why cite an authority to support you, if it doesn’t support you?

The tone of impending crisis in Laudate Deum is driven by an anticipation of tipping points, that is, approaching boundaries of irreversible loss.  It declares without any qualification that if global temperatures “should rise above 2 degrees, the icecaps of Greenland and a large part of Antarctica will melt completely, with immensely grave consequences for everyone.”

It again cites the IPCC, this time their 2023 report (B.3.2).  In the report one indeed finds the claim that “At sustained warming levels between 2°C and 3°C, the Greenland and West Antarctic ice sheets will be lost almost completely and irreversibly over multiple millennia.” That is, irreversible, if lost over multiple millennia.  But the IPCC qualifies and says there is only “limited evidence” to support even this claim.   “Limited evidence” is their lowest level of support.

One can go on and on.  Laudate Deum consistently turns qualified statements about the world into certainties appropriate only for articles of faith.  Unlike a truly scientific discussion, it does not review counter-objections or conflicting evidence.  Apparently, in the face of an emergency, one difficulty would indeed make one doubt.  Doubts must be avoided, like vaccine hesitancy.

At the same time it speaks derisively of anyone who would disagree with its assertions.  Such people are attempting “to deny, conceal, gloss over or relativize the issue.”  Scientists, too, who disagree only “seek to deny the evidence.” (n. 13)

That global warming would be a net harm is also taken for granted: “it is indubitable that the impact of climate change will increasingly prejudice the lives and families of many persons.”  Perhaps, but what is the net effect?   And are proposed remedies, all things considered, prudent?  Who can say? We face an emergency; apparently trade-offs are excluded.

In a concluding section on “Spiritual Motivations,” the Exhortation cites a book by a particularly disturbed feminist and anti-natalist professor, Donna Haraway, as the source of the idea of “contact zones” where diverse living things meet.  Ah, but it was Mary Louise Pratt who famously came up with that concept, not Donna Haraway.   But why worry about footnotes? Or sources?

You may also enjoy:

Hadley Arkes’ The Magical World of “Climate Change”

Robert Royal’s Living through an Apocalypse

AUTHOR

Michael Pakaluk

Michael Pakaluk, an Aristotle scholar and Ordinarius of the Pontifical Academy of St. Thomas Aquinas, is a professor in the Busch School of Business at the Catholic University of America. He lives in Hyattsville, MD with his wife Catherine, also a professor at the Busch School, and their eight children. His acclaimed book on the Gospel of Mark is The Memoirs of St Peter. His most recent book, Mary’s Voice in the Gospel of John: A New Translation with Commentary, is now available. His new book, Be Good Bankers: The Divine Economy in the Gospel of Matthew, is forthcoming from Regnery Gateway in the spring. Prof. Pakaluk was appointed to the Pontifical Academy of St Thomas Aquinas by Pope Benedict XVI.

RELATED ARTICLE: Symptoms of the Synod 2023 III – 25 October 2023

EDITORS NOTE: This Catholic Thing column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. © 2023 The Catholic Thing. All rights reserved. For reprint rights, write to: info@frinstitute.org. The Catholic Thing is a forum for intelligent Catholic commentary. Opinions expressed by writers are solely their own.

Finally, The New York Times Begrudgingly Admits It Was Wrong About the Gaza Hospital Attack thumbnail

Finally, The New York Times Begrudgingly Admits It Was Wrong About the Gaza Hospital Attack

By Jihad Watch

When there was an explosion at the parking lot at the Al-Ahli Baptist Hospital in Gaza last week, the New York Times was quick — much too quick, rather — heedless, off the mark, claiming that an Israeli airstrike was to blame for the attack “on the hospital,” and that nearly 500 people were killed. How did the Times know? It didn’t. It simply acted as a dutiful amanuensis, transcribing what Hamas dictated to its reporters. It ran with their account of the incident, without waiting for the Israelis to provide their detailed explanation of the blast. Within a matter of hours, Israel responded with its version of events: first, it said that an errant rocket fired by Palestinian Islamic Jihad had caused the explosion; second, the explosion was not in the hospital, which was largely unscathed, but in the parking lot of the hospital; third, that while it could not provide an exact figure, it believed there were far fewer than 500 people killed. But the damage was done. The Times had put out the story as Hamas wanted it, and Israel suffered terribly in the kangaroo court of public opinion.

Now, many days after it became crystal clear, through visual and audio evidence, including a view of the very small depression left by the blast, and after the American government, conducting its own forensic investigation, determined that Israel’s version of the incident was correct, the Grey Lady finally, albeit reluctantly, has had to admit it was wrong. The Times did not, of course, apologize for such an egregious and grievous error, nor take note of the likely violent consequences of disseminating that false claim, which in fact cam quickly to pass, with violent anti-Israel demonstrations all over the Arab and Muslim world. The Times is far too arrogant an institution to do that. More on how the high-and-mighty New York Times was brought low when it had to admit its error in the way it had covered the “hospital blast” story, can be found here: “NYT admits error in Gaza hospital report,” by Matt Berg, Politico, October 23, 2023:

The New York Times walked back its initial coverage on the explosion that killed hundreds of Palestinians at a Gaza Strip hospital last week, saying in an editors’ note that the newspaper “relied too heavily on claims” made by the Hamas militant group.

Just “an editors’ note”? On an inside page? The admission of its error ought by rights to have appeared where the misleading report had appeared — that is, on the front page, and in the same size type as the original.

Soon after a huge blast rocked the al-Ahli Hospital on Tuesday, finger-pointing over its source began.

Hamas, which has been battling Israel since its Oct. 7 surprise attack on Israeli soil, called the blast a “horrific massacre” and blamed the Israeli government. Israel, however, blamed the Islamic Jihad, a smaller, more radical group that often works with Hamas….

“The Times’s initial accounts attributed the claim of Israeli responsibility to Palestinian officials, and noted that the Israeli military said it was investigating the blast,” reads the Times’ editors’ note published on Monday. Early coverage “relied too heavily on claims by Hamas, and did not make clear that those claims could not immediately be verified.”

It took the Times six full days, from when the Israeli and American governments had presented their separate conclusions that Israel was blameless and that an errant rocket, launched from Gaza by Palestinian Islamic Jihad, had caused the “parking lot blast.” Why so long? What is it that makes the Times so reluctant to own up to its errors?

The newspaper’s coverage had a clear impact, according to the note: “The report left readers with an incorrect impression about what was known and how credible the account was.”…

That’s too weak. Make it stronger: “All the evidence supports Israel’s version of the incident.” Israel has explained, and provided the evidence, for what happened. The visuals show the rocket coming from Gaza toward Israel, and then suddenly breaking up, then heading downward and landing on the ground where the light of an explosion can be seen. And we have, too, the recorded telephone conversation of two Hamas operatives, discussing the fact that the rocket was fired by Palestinian Islamic Jihad. Why doesn’t the Times mention any of that in its “Editors’ Note”?

Five days ago, PBS presented Israel’s version of the cause of the blast. Three days ago the AP accepted Israel’s version after Washington had confirmed it. Two days ago, it was CNN that held Israel blameless. But the New York Times waited until six days had passed, long after everyone in the Western world had learned that the American government, having conducted its own investigation, had concluded that Israel was blameless.

Here was what National Security Council spokesperson Adrienne Watson tweeted the day after the blast: “While we continue to collect information, our current assessment, based on analysis of overhead imagery, intercepts and open source information, is that Israel is not responsible for the explosion at the hospital in Gaza yesterday.”

The Times stopped short of an apology for its initial coverage but said editors should have been more careful with the way the blast was represented….

Here’s what one would have wished from the Times: a full-throated, unbegrudging apology for the haste of its initial report, its credulous acceptance of a Hamas libel, and its unwillingness to wait just a few hours for Israel’s response. Surely it knew that putting the blame on Israel was likely to cause, and did cause, outbursts of anti-Israel hate all over the Arab and Muslim lands. Nor does the Times explain why the admission of its mistake came so many days after everyone else had admitted that Israel’s explanation of the blast was correct. Why was that? Perhaps the Times can assign a reporter to provide an “anatomy of an error ” to supplement that “Editor’s Note,” so that readers can find out exactly how, and why, that initial mistaken report came to be.

AUTHOR

HUGH FITZGERALD

RELATED ARTICLES:

Rashida Tlaib has extensive fundraising ties to Hamas supporters

What caused the Hamas massacre? Western pressure on Israel

Notes From The Underground: British Tube Driver Leads Anti-Israel Chant

Perilously Little Is Known About the CCP-Mideast Terror Connection

Hamas jihadi calls his father: ‘I killed them with my bare hands, your son killed Jews!’

Germany: Muslim arrested on suspicion of planning attack on pro-Israel demonstration

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Should SPLC List Its Own Employee Union as a Hate Group? thumbnail

Should SPLC List Its Own Employee Union as a Hate Group?

By Family Research Council

After weeks of silence from the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) on Hamas’s October 7 terror attack that killed more Jews than any event since the Holocaust, the SPLC employee’s union released its own statement via X, formerly known as Twitter, claiming to stand “strongly in solidarity with the Palestinian people.” The statement may cause the SPLC union to meet SPLC’s own criteria for an anti-Semitic hate group.

“What we see in Gaza is the violent imperialist desecration of a people — the beginnings of a genocide,” alleged the SPLC union, which claimed to stand for “anti-oppression and decolonization” and accused Israel of “occupation” and “apartheid.”

“How is Israel occupying Gaza? They’ve turned the keys over to them. There aren’t any Jewish people living in Gaza,” said Family Research Council President Tony Perkins, host of “Washington Watch.” “They were forced out. They had to leave their homes, their businesses, and they gave complete control lock, stock, and barrel to Hamas — well, to the Palestinians, who elected Hamas as their leaders.”

“They’re simply rewriting history,” responded Jewish Rabbi Yaakov Menken on “Washington Watch.” “There are no Jews in Gaza except for [dozens of] hostages, right? Those are the only Jews allowed in the country.” The SPLC union made no mention of the hostages taken captive by Hamas.

While no Jews are allowed in Gaza, Arabs are allowed in the rest of Israel. In fact, Arabs comprise approximately 20% of Israel’s population, and they enjoy full rights as citizens. The inhabitants of the Gaza Strip “had their own government [Hamas], and they’re the ones that have facilitated this terror that is now running Gaza and has spilled over into Israel, attacking innocent civilians,” said Perkins. If there is a system of “apartheid” — race-based segregation — it isn’t carried out by Israel.

“Palestinian Lives Matter. Palestinian families matter. Palestinian histories matter,” the SPLC union protested.

“Just calling Arabs Palestinians is racist and exclusionary,” Menken replied. “It says that Jews are not Palestinians, where that’s kind of inverting 2,000 years of world history. Ever since the Romans applied that European, colonialist name [‘Palestine’] to the Land of Israel, it was primarily Jews who were known by that title. So, the whole thing is fiction from beginning to end.”

“We support the ongoing call for a ceasefire and an end to the occupation,” continued the SPLC union. “We hope to move toward peace and freedom.”

“Exactly what does a cease fire mean in this context?” asked Menken. “It means allowing Hamas to regroup and rearm without releasing the hostages — so that further atrocities can happen. It’s very clear that what they’re after is not peace, but actual barbarism.”

In a speech Friday, President Biden stated, “Hamas — its stated purpose for existing is the destruction of the State of Israel and the murder of Jewish people.” A note found on the body of Hamas terrorist encouraged him that “the enemy is a disease that has no cure, except beheading and removing the hearts and livers.” Since Hamas will never accept peace, the SPLC union’s call for a ceasefire implicitly applies only to the nation of Israel.

By denying Israel the right to self-defense against an adversary devoted to their destruction, the only peace the SPLC union can “hope to move toward” would be one succeeding the destruction of the state of Israel. This is also implied in their use of the word “freedom,” evoking the chant at pro-Palestinian rallies, “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.” National Review Online Editor Philip Klein argued that anyone who utters this phrase “is advocating genocide,” as it implies the elimination of Israel and the killing of millions of Jews — half the world’s Jewish population, in fact.

Biden went further, “Hamas does not represent the Palestinian people. Hamas uses Palestinian civilians as human shields, and innocent Palestinian families are suffering greatly because of them.” Yet when the SPLC union chanted, “Palestinian Lives Matter,” “Palestinian families matter,” they were blaming the nation of Israel, not Hamas.

“Anybody who really cares about Palestinian Arabs would not want them under totalitarian rule,” urged Menken. “In Gaza, they can’t choose what to believe. They can’t choose what to say. They can’t choose whom to marry. Everything is controlled for them by Gaza’s rulers.” He said Hamas is “not promoting the rights of Palestinian Arabs or anything good for them. They’re just promoting further killing of Jews and Christians.”

The SPLC union added one final absurdity to their statement, “Already, the horrors of Gaza have fueled aggression in our own country in the forms of attacks against Muslims and Sikhs, and outbursts of antisemitism.”

The cause-and-effect hypothesized here is pure fantasy. The triggering event for increased threats against Jews and Muslims was not “the horrors of Gaza” but “the Hamas attack on Oct. 7,” as the left-wing New York Times said earlier this month. (Sikhs, meanwhile, are a religious group based in India, with no connection to the land of Israel, and recent anti-Sikh attacks bear no particular relation to the events in Palestine.)

A review of recent anti-Semitic incidents further undermines the SPLC’s theory. Left-wing activists glorified Hamas’s terrorist paratroopers. Activists tore down posters showing the Israeli hostages captured by Hamas. Mainstream media immediately accused Israel of bombing a hospital, when the U.S. intelligence community now assesses “with high confidence that Israel was not responsible for the explosion at the hospital and that Palestinian militants were responsible.” Most anti-Semitic incidents seem to be inspired by radical Islamic militants, including a former Hamas chief who called for a worldwide “Day of Jihad [Holy War].”

Much of the anti-Semitism was expressed on university campuses.

Ironically, the SPLC defines anti-Semitism as a feature that “undergirds much of the far right,” although university campuses are often hotbeds of radical leftism. “The same people who are oppressing Jews on campus are the ones pushing Christian organizations off of campus,” said Menken. Perkins agreed, “Anti-Semitic behavior is the canary in the coal mine … when it comes to religious freedom.”

Speaking of the SPLC, their definition of “anti-Semitism” includes “efforts to subvert and misconstrue the collective suffering of Jewish people,” as well as “racialize” and “vilify” them. Surely their employee union qualifies under this definition.

The SPLC union’s Palestinian solidarity statement made no mention of a brutal terrorist attack against Jewish people in Israel that involved more than 1,400 lives lost, more than 200 hostages captured, and untold amounts of burning, rape, destruction, and suffering. “Over here you have people justifying rape on a mass scale that also included crimes like beheading, not only beheading soldiers, but beheading babies,” said Menken. That sounds like subverting and misconstruing Jewish suffering.

Adding insult to injury, the SPLC brands Israel as oppressors, imperialists, and occupiers — not to mention committing genocide — all because they dared to respond to this unprovoked barbarity and fought back against an extremist group pledged to annihilate them. That sounds like a vilification campaign.

Why did the SPLC union side with Palestine — actually, Hamas — instead of Israel, when any honest observer knows Israel is the aggrieved party? According to their statement, because “SPLC Union is and will always be rooted in the legacy of anti-oppression and decolonization led by Black and Indigenous leaders.” (On a side note, do Jews not count as indigenous to Palestine, having been there 3,500 years?) In other words, it comes down to skin color, and Arabs have a slightly darker tint. That sounds like an effort to “racialize” the Jewish people.

Elsewhere, SPLC defines a “hate group” as an “organization that … has beliefs or practices that attack or malign an entire class of people, typically for their immutable characteristics.” It sounds like their employee’s labor union attacks and maligns the nation of Israel solely for being Jewish.

Not that the SPLC’s hate group definitions or designations should be taken too seriously. It’s notorious “hate map,” which lists mainstream conservative organizations and just about anybody it hates, has been linked to at least one anti-religious terrorist attack of its own — against Family Research Council in 2012. And the organization lost even more credibility in 2019 when its founder Morris Dees faced “complaints of workplace mistreatment of women and people of color” — a discrimination scandal which led to the ousting of all its (predominantly white) top leadership.

“Logically, a ‘hate group’ should be defined as one whose members 1) actually say that they hate a particular group of people; and/or 2) engage in or condone violence or other illegal activity toward such a group,” an FRC issue brief explained in 2012. “The SPLC, however, uses much broader criteria,” acknowledging that “alleged ‘hate group’ activities include constitutionally protected activities such as ‘marches, rallies, speeches, meetings, leafleting or publishing.’” Furthermore, SPLC “do[es] not distinguish between racist or violent groups and legitimate organizations that participate peacefully in the political process — tarring all with the same label.”

The SPLC union’s Palestine solidarity statement was constitutionally protected speech under the First Amendment. In America, people have the right to be wrong, and to let others know how wrong they are. The fact that the SPLC union’s constitutionally protected statement could conceivably be grounds for putting the organization on their employers’ own “hate group” list — if they were so inclined — only serves to further undermine the organization’s credibility and expose its bizarre definition of “hate” for the fraud that it is.

AUTHOR

Joshua Arnold

Joshua Arnold is a senior writer at The Washington Stand.

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2023 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

House Speaker Mike Johnson ‘Radiates the Love of Jesus,’ Conservatives Laud thumbnail

House Speaker Mike Johnson ‘Radiates the Love of Jesus,’ Conservatives Laud

By Family Research Council

House Republicans have selected “a tremendous man of God,” “a strong Christian,” a “servant leader,” and a “genuinely nice guy” by elevating Rep. Mike Johnson (R-La.) to the position of Speaker of the House, according to those closest to the legislator.

After 22 days without their top leader, House Republicans elected Johnson speaker by a 220-209 vote on Wednesday, winning the unanimous support of the chamber’s Republicans. All 209 dissenting votes went to House Minority Leader Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.). Johnson needed only 215 votes, as 429 congressmen were present; Rep. Vicente Gonzalez Jr. (R-Texas), Lou Correa (R-Calif.), and Derrick Van Orden (R-Wisc.) did not attend the vote.

“It is the honor of a lifetime to have been elected the 56th Speaker of the House,” said Johnson moments after his victory. “It has been an arduous few weeks, and a reminder that the House is as complicated and diverse as the people we represent.”

“I don’t believe there are any coincidences in a matter like this. I believe that Scripture, the Bible is very clear that God is the One that raises up those in authority. He raised up each of you, all of us. And I believe that God has ordained and allowed each one of us to be brought here for this specific moment and this time,” Johnson continued. “I believe that each one of us has a huge responsibility today to use the gifts that God has given us to serve the extraordinary people of this great country — and they deserve it — and to ensure that our republic remains standing as the great beacon of light and hope and freedom in a world that desperately needs it.”

He went on to note previous generations chose the national motto, “In God we trust,” as “a rebuke of the Cold War-era philosophy of the Soviet Union. That philosophy was Marxism and communism which begins with the premise that there is no God,” a “critical distinction” between atheistic socialism and our faith-based democratic republic.” America’s founders, said Johnson, believed “all men are created equal — not born equal, created equal,” and Americans need to “remember our creed.” He also shared that he was once inspired by seeing the carving of the face of Moses, which adorns the chamber.

Johnson took a moment to praise the faithful Christians in his life, as well. After acknowledging his colleagues, Johnson thanked his four children and wife, Kelly — an adviser to Louisiana Right to Life, teacher, and Christian counselor who had not yet gotten a flight to the nation’s capital to be at his side. “She spent the last couple of weeks on her knees, in prayer to the Lord, and she’s a little worn out,” he explained. After remembering his late father, a Shreveport fireman, Johnson said, “I want to thank my faithful mother, Jeanne Johnson, who bore me at the age of 17.”

Johnson directly quoted the Bible at a conference on Capitol Hill after the vote. “I was reminded of the Scripture that says suffering produces perseverance, perseverance produces character, and character produces hope. What this country needs is more hope,” he said. “Congress over the years has not delivered for the American people enough.”

Prayer has been a recurrent theme of Johnson’s decisions about who should to serve as Speaker of the House. “In January, [Rep. Mike Johnson] joined me on the House floor while we were in a deadlock over who our next Speaker would be. We lifted up the speaker’s race to the Lord and asked for his divine guidance. Immediately after the prayer, 14 members changed their votes, ultimately leading to Speaker McCarthy securing the gavel by the end of the day,” noted Rep. Greg Steube (R-Fla.) two hours before the vote. “Mike Johnson is a strong conservative, but above all else, he is a strong Christian. He’s not afraid to look to his faith for guidance.”

“America needs that more than ever in the U.S. House,” noted Steube.

In his announcement for speaker, Johnson wrote that only “after much prayer and deliberation, I am stepping forward now.” On Tuesday night, Johnson’s first act after winning the Republican conference’s nomination was to ask his fellow Republicans to join him in prayer.

The Johnson family attends Cypress Baptist Church in Benton, Louisiana, where Pastor John Fream described the new Speaker of the House as “a tremendous man of God, a historian, constitutional expert, biblical scholar and great family man,” as well as a “humble servant” who — together with his wife, Kelly — is “willing to follow the Lord wherever and however He leads.”

‘We’ve Been Praying for This’

Praise rained in on Johnson, the 51-year-old vice chair of the House Republican conference, for his voting record, faith, personality, and willingness to stand up for a biblical worldview.

Johnson “radiates the love of Christ,” Rep. Chris Smith (R-N.J.) told “Washington Watch with Tony Perkins” on Wednesday. The new Speaker of the House is “full of love of Jesus,” in addition to being an “effective scholar.” House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) noted Johnson’s “faith that drives him so deeply that some actually mock him,” but he holds to “the principles that make this country great.” He predicted the American “people are going to come to know and love what he represents.” Others praised Johnson’s low-key personality. “Mike epitomizes servant leadership,” said Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) — who spoke on behalf of Reps. Kevin McCarthy, Scalise, Jim Jordan, and Johnson during speaker votes.

“I’m so proud of Mike,” Family Research Council President Tony Perkins told Newsmax on Wednesday afternoon. “I’ve known Mike for 25 years, and he’s going to be an excellent speaker for the times in which we live. … He has sense of purpose, and that comes from his faith. He’s a strong believer.” Perhaps most importantly, Johnson “cares about people,” said Perkins. “It’s going to be a new day” in the nation’s capital.

American Family Radio host Rick Green described Johnson as “a champion for liberty … This man has a biblical worldview.”

“We’ve been praying for this. We’ve been praying for leaders who have a fear of God” and “a biblical foundation of truth,” said Green. “This is a moment to stop what you’re doing and thank God for this.”

A Conviction Politician

Since his election to Congress in 2016, Mike Johnson has earned a lifetime FRC Action score of 99.4%, reflecting his sterling pro-life, pro-family voting record. Last October, Johnson introduced the Stop Sexualization of Children Act, which would have barred federal funding from any sexually oriented school material intended for children under the age of 10. “[P]arents and legal guardians have the right and responsibility to determine where, if, when, and how their children are exposed to material of a sexual nature,” it states.

In House hearings, Johnson has strongly denounced transgender surgeries on minors as “barbarism. This is the mutilation of children, and it should be prohibited by our law. … This is adults deciding to permanently alter the bodies of children who do not have the capacity to make life-altering decisions on their own.” Johnson called the extreme gender ideology underlying these experimental surgeries “nightmarish and surreal.”

Johnson has acted as lead sponsor of pro-life legislation, as well. Johnson “has boldly championed life as an activist, litigator, state legislator, and as a member of Congress,” said SBA Pro-Life America President Marjorie Dannenfelser. “Rep. Mike Johnson is a pro-life champion with an A+ on SFLAction’s Pro-Life Generation Report Card,” said SLFAction President Kristan Hawkins. Speaker Johnson “will make the right to life and protecting women and their unborn children a priority in Congress,” said Carol Tobias, president of National Right to Life.

That record also earned him the ire of the abortion lobby. Reproductive Freedom for All (formerly NARAL Pro-Choice America) branded Johnson “a dangerous threat to reproductive freedom, just like the rest of his caucus.” EMILY’s List stated, “Unlike the new speaker, we know abortion care is health care.”

Other Democrats denounced Johnson for his defense of biblical marriage and sexual morality. Rep. Angie Craig (D-Minn.), who openly identifies as a lesbian, shouted “Happy anniversary to my wife!” as she voted for Jeffries during Johnson’s successful speaker vote. House Democrats applauded her outburst.

A constitutional attorney, Johnson advised President Donald Trump during both impeachments. He has voted against every transfer of U.S. taxpayer funds to the government of Ukraine, which has cracked down on religious liberty. And he noted that then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s decision to rip up the official copy of President Donald Trump’s State of the Union address constituted a felony. “He will be a great Speaker of the House,” said Donald Trump after the election, calling Johnson “a tremendous leader” who is “going to make us all proud.” Trump, who previously endorsed Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), promptly noted that he had “put out the word” for others to back Johnson before the vote.

Johnson is an across-the-board conservative who earned a 90% score from the Heritage Action scorecard, as well as an A+ from SBA Pro-Life America, 72% from Freedom Index (constitutional order), and 90% from the immigration watchdog NumbersUSA. Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) called Johnson “a fellow conservative and a man of deep Christian faith.” Rep. Jason Smith (R-Mo.), chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, attested that Johnson is “a proven conservative who is honorable, smart, and will do a great job leading the House Republican Conference.”

Before his election to Congress, Johnson served as a national spokesman for the Alliance Defending Freedom and a trustee of the Southern Baptist Convention’s Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission (ERLC), then led by conservative scholar Dr. Richard Land. A constitutional attorney and onetime talk show host, Johnson won FRC’s “Family, Family, and Freedom Award” in 2005 for successfully defending his state’s constitutional marriage protection amendment before the Louisiana Supreme Court. As a Louisiana legislator, he proposed a Marriage and Conscience Act, which would not allow politicians to withhold or cancel the state occupational licenses of workers with a religious objection to same-sex marriage.

“Some people are called to pastoral ministry and others to music ministry, etc. I was called to legal ministry, and I’ve been out on the front lines of the ‘culture war’ defending religious freedom, the sanctity of human life, and biblical values,” explained Johnson to a Louisiana Baptist newspaper when he first ran for national office in 2016.

Johnson became the fourth Speaker of the House candidate endorsed by the House Republicans, who had previously nominated  Scalise, Jordan, and Rep. Tom Emmer (R-Minn.). Emmer, one of just 39 House Republicans to vote twice for the so-called “Respect for Marriage” Act, withdrew without proceeding to a floor vote hours after winning the nomination. Former President Donald Trump came out swinging against Emmer, saying the “Republican Party cannot take that chance,” because “America First voters” will not support “a Globalist RINO [Republican In Name Only] like Tom Emmer.”

An Ambitious Agenda to Rebuild America as Speaker of the House

In his victory speech, Johnson laid out an ambitious agenda to rebuild American strength and regain the trust of the American people, which he said Congress stands “in jeopardy” of losing. “A strong America is good for the entire world. We are the beacon of freedom, and we must preserve this grand experiment in self-governance,” he said.

Johnson referred to rising international tensions in Israel and China, as well as soaring prices, and interest and mortgage rates at home. Johnson “has a keen understanding of the threat posed by China and the urgent need to pass legislation to counter the CCP, including important trade policy issues like tariffs and repealing China’s Most Favored Nation Status,” said Michael Stumo of the Coalition for a Prosperous America. Two-thirds of voters were more likely to support a candidate who favors tougher economic policies and higher tariffs against China; and 66% of voters say the Pentagon “needs to do more to prepare for military threats from China,” although a plurality oppose sending U.S. troops to fight the People’s Liberation Army on behalf of Taiwan, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll.

Johnson then mentioned the porous southern border, which had led to an unprecedented influx of fentanyl and a record-breaking number of American overdose deaths. “The status quo is unacceptable. Inaction is unacceptable, and we must come together and address the broken border,” he said to massive applause from the chamber’s Republicans.

“The greatest threat to our national security is our nation’s debt,” which now stands at more than $33 trillion and increased $20 million during his relatively brief speech. He promised to form a bipartisan commission on reducing the national debt and “bring relief to the American people by reining in federal spending and bringing down inflation.”

“We will defend our core principles to the end,” he said, citing “the seven core principles of American conservatism”: individual freedom, limited government, the rule of law, peace through strength, fiscal responsibility, free markets, and human dignity.

Johnson promised to return to normal order on the nation’s budget and appropriations process, to decentralize power away from the speaker’s office, and to preside over an ethical and transparent tenure as speaker.

“Our system of government is not a perfect system. It’s got a lot of challenges, but it’s still the best one in the world, and we have an opportunity to preserve it,” Johnson exhorted Congress. “The time for action is now, and I will not let you down.”

“Let the enemies of freedom around the world hear us loud and clear: The people’s House is back in business!”

Rep. Hal Rogers (R-Ky.) then swore in Johnson as the 56th Speaker of the House.

Rep. Roy summed up the Republican Party conference’s consensus with one word: “Onward.”

AUTHOR

Ben Johnson

Ben Johnson is senior reporter and editor at The Washington Stand.

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2023 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

Terrorist Found With Instructions to Remove Heads, Hearts of Jews thumbnail

Terrorist Found With Instructions to Remove Heads, Hearts of Jews

By Discover The Networks

Hamas terrorists were urged to decapitate and remove the hearts and livers of their Jewish victims during their raid on Israel, as detailed in a handwritten note found at the scene of the horrific attack.

The note contains words of encouragement from Hamas commanders declaring the religious importance of massacring Jews wherever they are found. It further draws lessons from historical Muslim leaders who massacred men, sold women and children into slavery, and decimated cities across the Judeo-Christian world.

Israel’s Government Press Office set out the contents of the note in a statement, saying:

Note found on Hamas terrorist: “Know that this enemy of yours is a disease that has no cure, other than beheading and extracting the hearts and livers!”

On October 7, 2023, Hamas terrorists invaded Israel and carried out a massacre in communities in southern Israel. A handwritten note was found on one of the terrorists which was given to him before the invasion.

The words from Hamas commanders consist of an order to kill Jews and encouragement to decapitate their victims and tear out their hearts and livers.

The Government Press Office attached a copy of the note in the original Arabic.

So the terrorists, believing Jews to be a “disease that has no cure,” gleefully followed their religious directive to butcher and rape Israeli women and children, including removing heads and hearts. And yet the Western Left hail them as “freedom fighters.”


Hamas

290 Known Connections

Each year, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and other Palestinian extremist organizations run summer camps that indoctrinate Palestinian youth with anti-Semitic propaganda while training them in the use of weapons and jihadist combat tactics. Most of these camps are named in honor of Palestinian “martyrs” who died while committing terrorist attacks against Israeli Jews. Some 120,000 young people attended the Hamas camps alone in 2017…

To learn more about Hamas, click here.

RELATED VIDEO: The Murderous Consequences of Western Diplomacy

RELATED ARTICLES:

Hachem Safieddine, Head Of Hizbullah’s Executive Council: We Warn Israel, America, The Despicable Europeans – You Already Came To Lebanon Once And We Forced You To Flee Like Mice

Iran-Affiliated Mayadeen Network Posts AI-Generated Music Video Threatening The U.S. And Israel: ‘We Are Waiting For You; We Will Make Your Crazy People More Insane’; Video Ends With Jews Fleeing Israel In Ships Following Missile Attack

Israel Removes Thunberg from School Curricula over Gaza Post

Dem Rep. Moskowitz Calls For Censure of Tlaib Over Israel Lies

Army Legal Expert Slams AOC’s War Crimes Charge Against Israel

CNN’s Cuomo Blasts College Students For Siding With Hamas Terrorists

EDITORS NOTE: This Discover the Networks column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

FLORIDA: Governor Ron DeSantis Shuts Down Terror-Linked ‘Students for Justice in Palestine’ thumbnail

FLORIDA: Governor Ron DeSantis Shuts Down Terror-Linked ‘Students for Justice in Palestine’

By The Geller Report

For those of us who have covered this terror group for years, this move is long overdue. Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) is a vicious hate group that supports Jewish genocide and Islamic savagery.


“Students for Justice in Palestine is a well-organized and well-financed festering hate group with chapters in the country’s most elite colleges. Its bigotry operates with the consent of administrators and faculty. Its speakers promote the murder of Jews and the denial of the Holocaust while their appearances are funded with student fees. Its chapters have been sanctioned and condemned for their bigoted activities, but no university has been willing to clearly and consistently denounce this hate group’s presence on campus.” (more here)

Now, Governor Ron DeSantis directed the chancellor of the State University System of Florida to deactivate the “Students for Justice in Palestine” group after it was revealed they sent out a “toolkit” inviting members to aid Hamas in their Operation Al-Aqsa Flood terrorist attacks. It is illegal in Florida to provide material support to foreign terror groups.

  • SJP  is a terror-supporting, antisemitic network that harasses and intimidates Jewish students who support Israel and operates with autonomy and impunity at scores of colleges and universities across the United States.
  • SJP’s founders, financial patrons and ideological supporters have been linked to Islamic and Palestinian terror organizations such as Hamas, Hezbollah, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and the Marxist Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP).

Breaking: Gov. @RonDeSantis directed the chancellor of the State University System of Florida to deactivate the “Students for Justice in Palestine” group after it was revealed they sent out a “toolkit” inviting members to aid Hamas in their Operation Al-Aqsa Flood terrorist… pic.twitter.com/bMmoI2ZKt1

— Andy Ngô 🏳️‍🌈 (@MrAndyNgo) October 24, 2023

SJP’S Terror links, violence, bigotry and intimidation on U.S. Campuses

Discover the Networks:

SJP’s principal founder, Hatem Bazian—whose views and agendas will be discussed at greater length later in this pamphlet—has quoted approvingly from a famous Islamic hadith which calls for the violent slaughter of Jews and which appears in Hamas’s founding charter. He once spoke at a fundraising dinner for KindHearts for Charitable Humanitarian Development, a Hamasfront group that the U.S. government later shut down due to the organization’s ties to Islamic terrorism. On another occasion, Bazian portrayed Hamas as “a classical anti-colonial nationalist and religious guerrilla movement.” And he described Hamas’s victory in the 2006 Gaza elections as “a monumental event.”

The significance of Bazian’s—and SJP’s—affinity for Hamas becomes especially apparent when we contemplate the grotesque nature of the values for which that organization stands. Consider, for instance, the fact that Hamas’s aforementioned founding charter denounces “the Nazism of the Jews” and states explicitly that: “Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it”; peace initiatives “are all contrary to the beliefs of the Islamic Resistance Movement”; “there is no solution to the Palestinian problem except by Jihad”; and “war for the sake of Allah” is a noble venture that requires the faithful to “assault and kill” on a massive scale.

Notwithstanding Hamas’s calls for mass murder and genocide, the website of SJP’s UC Berkeley chapter describes Hamas not as a terrorist group but rather as “a vast social organization” that “provides schools, medical care, and day care for a number of Palestinians who otherwise live difficult lives”; a group with a “clean record as far as domestic corruption in governance [is] concerned”; and an entity whose “officials have often stated that they are ready for a long-term truce with Israel during which time final status negotiations can occur.” SJP does make a pro forma acknowledgment that “Hamas has conducted numerous deadly attacks on Israeli civilians” and “committed numerous human rights abuses against Palestinians,” but then quickly draws a moral equivalence between Hamas’s deeds and “the racism and discrimination underlying the policies and laws of the state of Israel.”

It is commonplace for SJP’s rank-and-file members to support Islamic terrorism….

Keep reading.

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

RELATED ARTICLES:

Gazans’ Support For Hamas Terrorists Is Main Issue as Israel Girds for Long Fight

‘Just as Cruel as the Terrorists’: Many Ordinary Palestinians Joined in Hamas’s Atrocities Against Israel

RELTEATED TWEETS ON X:

U.S. Campus Group, “#Students for Justice in #Palestine” Asks Members to Assist Hamas in Operation Al Aqsa Flood; i.e. to Kill U.S. Jews#sjp is active throughout the UC system, including #UCLA, #UCBerkeley, #UCDavis and #UCSD. #hamas https://t.co/S2Zaarx0PU

— Santa Monica Observer Newspaper. (@SMObserved) October 25, 2023

The group isn’t being banned for liking a terrorist group. Their “toolkit” explicitly invites members to provide support for Hamas and to join them as members of Operation Al-Aqsa Flood (the name of the Hamas operation where atrocities were committed on civilians on Oct. 7). This… https://t.co/vbsQBtZc0m

— Andy Ngô 🏳️‍🌈 (@MrAndyNgo) October 24, 2023

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Islam and Christian Realism thumbnail

Islam and Christian Realism

By The Catholic Thing

Francis X. Maier: For all of Islam’s strengths, anti-Jewish and anti-Christian prejudice has a long and often bitter history in Islam, despite claims to the contrary.

Most Westerners were shocked by the savagery of Hamas’s recent attacks on Israel and the systematic murder of Israeli citizens by Hamas terrorists  That wickedness was compounded by blaming Israel for a catastrophic missile strike on a Gaza hospital, when the evidence now shows that the hundreds dead were actually killed by one of Hamas’s own rockets.  But maybe the most stunning media images involved the millions of people in the Arab world and many Western capitals celebrating the Hamas violence.

Since Vatican II, Catholics and many other Christians have placed a premium on interfaith dialogue and cooperation, especially with Judaism, but also with Islam.  The results – as a I saw firsthand in the years I served as a diocesan interfaith officer – have often been deeply rewarding.  But it’s worth remembering that while Christianity has its roots in Judaism, our relationship with Islam is a very different matter.  Hence the following thoughts might be worth considering:

Whoever knows the Old and New Testaments, and then reads the Koran, clearly sees the process by which it completely reduces Divine Revelation [emphasis in original].  It is impossible not to note the movement away from what God said about Himself, first in the Old Testament through the Prophets, and then finally in the New Testament through His Son.  In Islam, all the richness of God’s self-revelation, which constitutes the heritage of the Old and New Testaments, has definitely been set aside.

Some of the most beautiful names in the human language are given to the God of the Koran, but He is ultimately a God outside of the world, a God who is only Majesty, never Emmanuel, God-with-us.  Islam is not a religion of redemption . . .

For this reason, not only the theology but also the anthropology of Islam is very distant from Christianity.

– St. John Paul II, from Crossing the Threshold of Hope

The world, as [the scholar Bat Ye’or] brilliantly shows, is divided into two regions: the dar al-Islamand the dar al-harb; in other words, the “domain of Islam” and “the domain of war.  The world is no longer divided into nations, peoples, and tribes.  Rather, they are all located en bloc in the world of war, where war is the only possible relationship with the outside world.  The earth belongs to Allah, and all its inhabitants must acknowledge this reality; to achieve this goal there is but one method: war.  War, then, is clearly an institution, not just an incidental or fortuitous institution, but a constituent part of the thought, organizations, and structures of this world.  Peace with this world of war is impossible.  Of course, it is sometimes necessary to call a halt; there are circumstances where it is better not to make war.  The Koran makes provision for this.  But this changes nothing: [For Islam,] war remains an institution, which means that it must resume as soon as circumstances permit.

I have greatly stressed the characteristics of this war, because there is so much talk nowadays of the tolerance and fundamental pacifism of Islam that it is necessary to recall its nature, which is fundamentally warlike.

Islam, politics, and culture:

The two religions with a “political” dimension did not acquire it in the same way.  Christianity gained ground in the ancient world against the power of the Roman Empire, which had persecuted Christians for almost three centuries before itself adopting the Christian religion.  Islam, after a brief period of trials, triumphed during the lifetime of its founder.  It then conquered, by warfare, the right to operate in peace, and even the right to dictate conditions of survival to the adepts of other religions “of the Book.”  In modern terms, we might say that Christianity conquered the state through civil society; Islam, to the contrary, conquered civil society through the state [emphasis in original].

Thus from the start, Christianity set itself outside the political domain, and its founding texts bear witness to a mistrust of things political. . . .For Islam, the separation of the political and the religious has no right to exist.  It is even shocking, for it appears as an abandonment of human affairs to the power of evil or a relegation of God to a place outside his proper sphere.  The ideal city must be here below.  In principle, it already exists: It is the Muslim city.

– Ratzinger Prize laureate and professor emeritus of medieval and Arabic philosophy at the Sorbonne, Rémi Brague, from The Law of God: The Philosophical History of an Idea

Islam, despite claims of a common ancestry with Judaism and Christianity stemming from Abraham, and despite its formal respect for Jesus and Mary, has very little in common with Christian faith.  Islam denies the Trinity, the Incarnation, and the Redemption.  It denies the accuracy of the Gospels.  And it denies the origins and purpose of the Church.  In fact, Islam acknowledges Judaism and Christianity purely as aberrations in its own syncretic story.

Today, Christians in Muslim-dominated states like Sudan, Egypt, Iran, Pakistan, Turkey, Bangladesh, and Indonesia face everything from marginalization and harassment to outright violence.  The reason is simple.  For all of Islam’s strengths, anti-Jewish and anti-Christian prejudice has a long and often bitter history in Islam, despite claims to the contrary.

This doesn’t license a similar prejudice on our part.  But it does demand that we bring realism, courage, firmness, and an accurate memory to our modern encounter with Islam – both in the Middle East and here at home.  In the light of the Gospel, Mohammed is not a true prophet, and the Koran is not the Word of God.  As Jesus himself said, only he is the way to the Father.  And Muslims do not finally know him.  Without our active witness to the Islamic world, they never will.

You may also enjoy:

James V. Schall, S.J. A Jihadist Conquest

Matthew Hanley’s A Black Book on Jihad

AUTHOR

Francis X. Maier

Francis X. Maier is a senior fellow in Catholic studies at the Ethics and Public Policy Center.

EDITORS NOTE: This Catholic Thing column is republished with permission. © 2023 The Catholic Thing. All rights reserved. For reprint rights, write to: info@frinstitute.org. The Catholic Thing is a forum for intelligent Catholic commentary. Opinions expressed by writers are solely their own.


Note: Father Robert Sirico and Robert Royal discuss “The Hong Konger,” a documentary film about Jimmy Lai, an imprisoned Catholic business man and media giant who has stood up to the encroachments of the Communist Chinese regime. No senior figure in the Vatican has said a word about his case. Click here to watch the podcast: Jimmy Lai: Catholic Hero and Confessor.

Elderly Hostage Freed By Hamas Details Horrific Treatment thumbnail

Elderly Hostage Freed By Hamas Details Horrific Treatment

By The Daily Caller

An elderly Israeli hostage released by Hamas terrorists Monday night detailed the horrific treatment she endured after she was kidnapped, video shows.

Eighty-five year-old Yocheved Lifshitz was kidnapped Oct. 7 after Hamas terrorists abducted her from kibbutz.

Lifshitz said a “swarm” of terrorists broke through a roughly-$615 million security gate and “stormed our homes,” according to the New York Post (NYP).

“They hit people,” Lifshitz told reporters. “They did not care about kidnapping [the] elderly and children. It was extremely painful.”

Lifshitz said the terrorists threw her onto a motorcycle sideways, with one half of her body dangling off each side.

“When I was on the bike, my legs were on one side and the rest of my body on the other side. The young men hit me on the way,” Lifshitz said, according to the NYP.

“Each person had a guard watching him or her. They took care of all the needs. They talked about all kinds of things, they were very friendly.”

Yocheved Lifshitz details what it was like while being held hostage by Hamas.

🔗 https://t.co/ViphYGDoVz

📺 Sky 501 and YouTube pic.twitter.com/lSs5io56uH

— Sky News (@SkyNews) October 24, 2023

“They didn’t break my limbs, but it was extremely painful for me.”

Lifshitz said they arrived at a network of tunnels and walked several kilometers on wet ground before coming upon a group of approximately 25 other hostages. Several hours later, five of the hostages were brought from the area to a separate room guarded by a man, she said, according to the outlet.

“When we got there, they told us they believe in the Quran and will give us the same conditions they have,” Lifshitz said. She also recounted how a doctor came every few days to check on the hostages and a paramedic provided medical care to the injured hostages, according to the report.

“They took good care of the wounded,” Lifshitz said.

Lifshitz was released alongside her 79-year-old neighbor, Nurit Cooper.

Military spokesman Abu Ubaiba from the Al-Qassam Brigades said Hamas was willing to release the two women despite Israel’s refusal to stop airstrikes in the Gaza region.

“We have decided to release them for compelling humanitarian and satisfactory reasons despite the occupation committing more than 8 violations of the procedures that were agreed upon with the mediator brothers that the occupation would adhere to during this day to complete the handover process,” the spokesman said on Telegram, the NYP reported.

Lifshitz was seen allegedly turning back to wish the Hamas terrorists peace before they freed her.

AUTHOR

BRIANNA LYMAN

News and commentary writer. Follow Brianna on Twitter,

RELATED ARTICLES:

‘Get Everyone Back’: Family Of Hostages Released By Hamas Say They’re Focused On Helping More Return

THE WAR ON X: WW III • The Global War Against Islamic Terrorism — Day 17

Socialist Party Founding Member Renounces Membership Over Group’s Hamas Support

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Socialist Party Founding Member Renounces Membership Over Group’s Hamas Support thumbnail

Socialist Party Founding Member Renounces Membership Over Group’s Hamas Support

By The Daily Caller

A founding member of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) is leaving following the rise of pro-Hamas sentiment amongst the organization, he announced in a Monday article.

High-profile members of the DSA publicly denounced the New York City Democratic Socialist’s (NYC DSA) rally in Times Square Oct. 8, which followed Hamas terrorist attacks on Israel. Now, one longtime DSA member and one founding member are renouncing their memberships because of the pro-Hamas stance of many younger members.

“An organization that can’t take a stand condemning a right-wing terrorist group that set out to murder as many Jewish civilians, including children and infants, as it can lay its hands on, has forfeited the right to call itself democratic socialist,” Maurice Isserman, a professor of history at Hamilton College and founding member of the DSA, wrote in The Nation.

“The Democratic Socialists of America’s initial reaction to Hamas’s murders of more than 1,200 Israelis, the vast majority of them civilians, has brought a torrent of entirely merited criticism down upon the group,” said Harold Meyerson, a 48-year member of the DSA, in The American Prospect.

The NYC DSA’s rally drew criticism from state and federal level New York Democratic officials, including Gov. Kathy Hochul, Rep. Hakeem Jeffries and New York City Mayor Eric Adams. Following criticism, the NYC DSA backtracked on its rally in a statement.

“It should not be hard to shut down hatred and antisemitism where we see it. That is a core tenet of solidarity,” Democratic New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said following the NYC DSA rally.

“It’s not that Israel’s refusal to permit the establishment of a viable Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza, and its treatment of Palestinians there, isn’t horrific, but not condemning Hamas? C’mon,” Meyerson continued.

Democratic Michigan Rep. Shri Thanedar renounced his DSA membership in a statement Oct. 11 and said he “can no longer associate with an organization unwilling to call out terrorism.”

The DSA and NYC DSA did not immediately respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.

AUTHOR

BRANDON POULTER

Contributor.

RELATED ARTICLES:

‘An Inflection Point’: Democratic Socialists Squabble Over Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

‘Goes Out There And Lies’: Joy Behar Condemns Rashida Tlaib Over Her Refusal To Correct Her Claim About Gaza Hospital

Committee To Protect Journalists Includes Hamas Propagandists On List Of Journalists Killed In Gaza

Elderly Hostage Freed By Hamas Details Horrific Treatment

Israel Decries UN Secretary Who Said Hamas Attacks ‘Did Not Happen In A Vacuum’

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

“Palestinian terrorists cut an eye out of the father’s face, cut the breasts off the mother, chopped off the son’s fingers, and chopped off the foot of the daughter” thumbnail

“Palestinian terrorists cut an eye out of the father’s face, cut the breasts off the mother, chopped off the son’s fingers, and chopped off the foot of the daughter”

By The Geller Report

The torture!

IDF shares harrowing videos, photos of Hamas attacks

By: NY Post, October 23, 2023:

The Israel Defence Forces shared a harrowing 43-minute compilation Monday of Hamas’ surprise terror attack that killed more than 1,400 people — including an interview with a terrorist who admitted that he had clear orders to kill women and children and even rape the bodies of the dead.

The horrific videos and pictures shared with journalists contain graphic evidence of Hamas gunning down, torturing, and decapitating civilians during their invasion across the Gaza border on Oct. 7.

Before killing a family in their home, the Palestinian terrorists cut an eye out of the father’s face, cut the breasts off the mother, chopped off the son’s fingers, and chopped off the foot of the daughter.pic.twitter.com/PTlSx37NQ7

— Marina Medvin 🇺🇸 (@MarinaMedvin) October 24, 2023

One of the videos shows the shocking moment a group of terrorists, disguised as IDF soldiers, flag down cars passing by before shooting the occupants.

The bodies are then dragged out of the vehicles and left on the side of the road, with the Hamas members then seen robbing the victims’ belongings from the bullet-ridden cars, The Times of Israel reported.

Another video shows a captured member of Hamas admitting that the terrorists “became animals” when carrying out their orders to slaughter and terrorize people across Israel.

Keep reading.

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

RELATED TWEETS ON X:

Hamas raped little girls so brutally, it broke their pelvises.

This is another reason why we will destroy Hamas, and nothing in the world will stop us. https://t.co/rZBPwWp5Yz

— Eylon Levy (@EylonALevy) October 24, 2023

INSANE! Israel releases a phone call between a terrorist who calls his family to take pride in massacring 10 Jews with his own hands.

Let the world know! #HamasNazis pic.twitter.com/IZDEdfBCY8

— Hananya Naftali (@HananyaNaftali) October 24, 2023

October 7th, Southern Israel.
A young Israeli was executed by the Nazi Hamas’ terrorists. pic.twitter.com/HViE4wgPFh

— Israel War Room (@IsraelWarRoom) October 24, 2023

“Kill, stomp on their heads, chop off their legs … having sex with dead bodies.”

Just sheer, depraved evil. A captured Hamas terrorist reveals their instructions from the Hamas leadership.

THIS is who folks want Israel to have a cease-fire with? pic.twitter.com/ADw8wKdaxX

— Arsen Ostrovsky (@Ostrov_A) October 23, 2023

Hamas beheaded babies. Hamas beheaded babies. Hamas beheaded babies. Hamas beheaded babies. Hamas beheaded babies. Hamas beheaded babies. Hamas beheaded babies. Hamas beheaded babies. Hamas beheaded babies. Hamas beheaded babies. Hamas beheaded babies. Hamas beheaded babies.… pic.twitter.com/SpoWWcAU0I

— Israel War Room (@IsraelWarRoom) October 23, 2023

A compilation of interrogations of Hamas terrorists responsible for the #October7massacre. In the interrogations, they admit to a litany of crimes against humanity including rape, beheading, child killing and more. pic.twitter.com/mKzR8uGphp

— Emily Schrader – אמילי שריידר امیلی شریدر (@emilykschrader) October 23, 2023

Just came home to hundreds of people outside of my apartment here in NYC calling for Intifada, which given recent events, may well be considered a call for the mass murder of Jews. Never did I expect to see this kind of open antisemitism so close to home. pic.twitter.com/DLxGpzMxHQ

— Eli Klein (@TheEliKlein) October 23, 2023

Hamas terrorists dressed as IDF soldiers slaughtered Israeli civilians who tried to escape the music festival.

How can anyone justify this war crime? #HamasISIS pic.twitter.com/Ia70zBniN5

— Hananya Naftali (@HananyaNaftali) October 24, 2023

“I would like to explain what I saw – but I don’t want to scare people off.”

Danish journalist Jotam Confino, who was shown raw bodycam footage of Hamas’s atrocities, hesitates before telling Piers Morgan exactly what he saw.@mrconfino | @piersmorgan | #PMU pic.twitter.com/YTwZvUi1wu

— Piers Morgan Uncensored (@PiersUncensored) October 23, 2023

Many people have expressed shock at the depraved behaviour of Hamas on 7 October.

It is indeed shocking, but not in the least surprising.

Did you pay attention in 2016 when Hallel Ariel, just 13 years-old, was knived to death in her bed?

Did you pay attention in 2011 when the… pic.twitter.com/0fdPOQAINY

— (((Emanuel Miller))) 🌻 (@emanumiller) October 24, 2023

RELATED ARTICLES:

IDF shares harrowing videos, photos of Hamas attacks

Hamas Terrorists Were Carrying Instructions for Deploying CYANIDE-Based Chemical Weapons in Israelis Villages

“WHAT I SAW”: Foreign Press Screens Gruesome Videos Of Atrocities (Too Graphic for Public Release) Collected from Hamas

Hamas terrorists were told by commanders to behead Israelis and cut their feet and what they did to the bodies of Jewish women…..

Israeli Morgue: ‘Evidence of mass rape so brutal that they broke their victims’ pelvis – women, grandmothers, children.’ ‘People whose heads have been cut off. Faces blasted off. Heads smashed and their brains spilling out. A baby was cut out of a pregnant woman and beheaded and then the mother was beheaded’

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

HIDEOUS: When Asked About Spike in Jew Hatred in America, Biden Again Denounces ‘Islamophobia’ thumbnail

HIDEOUS: When Asked About Spike in Jew Hatred in America, Biden Again Denounces ‘Islamophobia’

By The Geller Report

Imagine FDR denouncing Naziophobia when news of the death camps broke.

Islamic Jew hatred is an Islamic imperative. It’s a central tenet of Islam. So ….. opposition to Islamic Jew hatred is “islamophobia.”

Just for knowing: Based on the FBI’s most recent hate crime statistics, hate crimes against Jews represent over half of religion-related hate crimes, while hate crimes against Muslims represent only 9.6% of religion-related hate crimes. Jews experience over 5 times more hate crimes than Muslims.

As antisemitic attacks increase, Biden again denounces ‘Islamophobia’

Marchers all over the country have openly declared their support for the “Palestinian” jihad.

In Michigan, a Jewish synagogue leader was brutally murdered in what many suspect was an antisemitic attack. These has been no increase in the already small number of cases (no number is justified) of attacks of innocent Muslims.

So what is Biden’s agenda here?

It is to shift focus away from the Jews as the victims of the Oct. 7 jihad massacre, and on Muslims as the “real victims” of an alleged “Islamophobia” that followed.

As Americans, we must come together and reject Islamophobia and all forms of bigotry and hatred.

I have said repeatedly that I will not be silent in the face of hate.

We must be unequivocal: There is no place in America for hate against anyone. pic.twitter.com/78GJ5mCExt

— Joe Biden (@JoeBiden) October 23, 2023

A similar process happened after 9/11 also: the media eventually came around to publishing “Muslims are the real victims” stories.

The ultimate aim of the Biden regime, in keeping with its well-established endeavor to crush dissent and destroy the freedom of speech (hi, NewsGuard!), is to stigmatize any criticism of Islam that follows in the wake of these attacks in Israel, and silence those who dare to enunciate it.

The Morning Briefing: Pure Evil—Team Biden Pimping Nonexistent ‘Islamophobia’ Narrative

BY STEPHEN KRUISER

Top O’ the Briefing

Happy Tuesday, dear Kruiser Morning Briefing friends. Shredwyn was fond of showing up to Duck Whittling Club sporting a fuchsia tam o’shanter and bearing trays full of apple tartlets.

Ever since September 11, 2001, Democrats have insisted that the real problem with Islamic terrorists killing innocent people is that innocent people might take a dim view of Islamic terrorists.

How dare we?

We’ve had a few discussions in the past couple of weeks about the Democrats’ inability to differentiate good from evil. Several times during the first week after Hamas decided to launch a terror spree by slaughtering a bunch of kids at a music festival, it appeared as if some Democrats might finally be breaking free from the hive mind and its knee-jerk Islamophobia chorus. I suspected that most of them were just observing a perfunctory period of lip service and would soon be back to their blood-soaked gray area.

It didn’t take long.

Thus far we’ve been covering what the likes of avowed terrorist sympathizers like Rashida Tlaib, Ilhan Omar, and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez have been up to. I also went off on President LOL Eighty one million’s tone-deaf, embarrassing trip to Israel in last Thursday’s Briefing.

As we are all painfully aware, Joe Biden always finds a way to make any awful thing he’s done even worse. After making a trip to Israel just so he could offer to cut a check to the terrorists, Biden and his puppet masters did what they always do after Islamic terrorists murder people: they started barking “Islamophobia” like trained seals.

Read more.

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

RELATED ARTICLES: 

Majority Aged 18-24 Say Hamas Atrocities of Israeli Civilians ‘Justified’

UN Secretary General Defends Hamas Atrocities, Endorses Genocide, Blames Israel

Canada: Thousands march in pro-Hamas rally in Toronto; Jewish businesses targeted like “1930’s Berlin”

Victor David Hanson: Israel vs. a Death Cult

Nazis March in Skokie ……. Again But This Time Jews Beaten, Nazis Cheered

“Palestinian terrorists cut an eye out of the father’s face, cut the breasts off the mother, chopped off the son’s fingers, and chopped off the foot of the daughter”

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

VIDEO: Palestine – The Absolute Facts thumbnail

VIDEO: Palestine – The Absolute Facts

By Dr. Rich Swier

Discover the Networks: The Truth About Palestine

According to Palestinian revisionism, the Palestinians lived from time immemorial in historic Palestine, which is portrayed as a veritable paradise of flourishing orchards and fertile vineyards, teeming with happy peasants. Then, according to the mythic narrative, the Zionists came and, with the support of the British, stole the Palestinians’ land, exiled the people, and initiated a reign of terror and ethnic cleansing that has not abated until this very day.

Since the Six Day War of 1967, the Arab world’s most powerful leaders — in Egypt, Libya, Arabia, Syria, and Iraq prior to Saddam Hussein‘s demise — have waged a war of words against Israel. Having failed to defeat Israel by means of naked military aggression, these leaders and their advisors decided, sometime between the end of the war and the Khartoum Conference of August-September 1967, to bring about the destruction of Israel by means of a relentless terror war.

To justify to the world their ruthless murder of Israeli civilians and their undying hatred of the West, these leaders needed to invent a narrative depicting Israel as a racist, war-mongering, oppressive, apartheid state that was illegally occupying Arab land and carrying out the genocide of an indigenous people that had a stronger claim to the land of Israel than did Israel itself.

Thus the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), under the tutelage of the Soviet KGB, invented “The Palestinian People” who allegedly had been forced to wage a war of national liberation against imperialism.

To justify this notion, Yasser Arafat, shortly after taking over as leader of the PLO, sent his adjutant, Abu Jihad (later the leader of the PLO’s military operations), to North Vietnam to study the strategy and tactics of guerrilla warfare in the hopes that the PLO could emulate Ho Chi Minh’s success with left-wing sympathizers in the United States and Europe. Ho’s chief strategist, General Giap, offered advice that changed the PLO’s identity and future: “Stop talking about annihilating Israel and instead turn your terror war into a struggle for human rights. Then you will have the American people eating out of your hand.”

Giap’s counsel was simple but profound: the PLO needed to work in a way that concealed its real goals, permitted strategic deception, and gave the appearance of moderation. And the key to all this was creating an image that would help Arafat manipulate the American and Western news media.

Arafat developed the images of the “illegal occupation” and “Palestinian national self-determination,” both of which lent his terrorism the mantle of a legitimate peoples’ resistance. After the Six Day War, Muhammad Yazid, who had been minister of information in two Algerian wartime governments (1958-1962), imparted to Arafat some wisdom that echoed the lessons he had learned in North Vietnam:

“Wipe out the argument that Israel is a small state whose existence is threatened by the Arab states, or the reduction of the Palestinian problem to a question of refugees; instead, present the Palestinian struggle as a struggle for liberation like the others. Wipe out the impression . . . that in the struggle between the Palestinians and the Zionists, the Zionist is the underdog. Now it is the Arab who is oppressed and victimized in his existence because he is not only facing the Zionists but also world imperialism.”

The term “Palestine” (Falastin in Arabic) was an ancient name for the general geographic region that is more or less today’s Israel. The name derives from the Philistines, who originated from the eastern Mediterranean, and invaded the region in the 11th and 12th centuries B.C.  The Philistines were apparently either from Greece, Crete, the Aegean Islands, and/or Ionia. They seem to be related to the Bronze Age Greeks, and they spoke a language akin to Mycenaean Greek. Their descendants, still living on the shores of the Mediterranean, greeted Roman invaders a thousand years later. The Romans corrupted the name to “Palestina,” and the area under the sovereignty of their city-states became known as “Philistia.” Six-hundred years later, the Arab invaders called the region “Falastin.”

Throughout subsequent history, the name remained only a vague geographical entity. There was never a nation of “Palestine,” never a people known as the “Palestinians,” nor any notion of “historic Palestine.” The region never enjoyed any sovereign autonomy, remaining instead under successive foreign sovereign domains from the Umayyads and Abbasids to the Fatimids, Ottomans, and British.

During the centuries of Ottoman rule, no Arabs under Turkish rule made any attempt to formulate an ideology of national identity, least of all the impoverished Arab peasantry in the region today known as Israel.

The term “Palestinian,” ironically, was used during the British Mandate period (1922-1948) to identify the Jews of British Mandatory Palestine. The Arabs of the area were known as “Arabs,” and their own designation of the region was balad esh-Sham (the province of Damascus). While some Arab nationalist writers, and coffee-shop intellectuals in Cairo or Beirut, developed the concept of Arab nationalism in large part as a response to Zionism, the terms “Palestine” and “Palestinian” were used in their traditional sense as geographic designations, not as national identities.

In early 1947, in fact, when the UN was exploring the possibility of the partition of British Mandatory Palestine into two states, one for the Jews and one for the Arabs, various Arab political and academic spokespersons spoke out vociferously against such a division because, they argued, the region was really a part of southern Syria, no such people or nation as “Palestinians” had ever existed, and it would be an injustice to Syria to create a state ex nihilo at the expense of Syrian sovereign territory.

During the 19 years from Israel’s victory in 1948 to Israel’s victory in the Six-Day War, all that remained of the UN’s partitioned territory to the “Arabs” of British Mandatory Palestine were the West Bank, under illegal Jordanian sovereignty, and the Gaza Strip, under Egyptian rule. Never during these 19 years did any Arab leader anywhere in the world argue for the right of national self-determination for the Arabs of these territories. A “Palestinian” nation and “Palestinian” people had not yet been invented.

Article 24 of the PLO’s original founding document, the PLO Covenant, states: “This Organization (the PLO) does not exercise any regional sovereignty over the West Bank in the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, in the Gaza Strip or the Himmah area.” For Arafat before the Six-Day War, Palestine was Israel. It was not the West Bank or the Gaza Strip — because the West Bank and the Gaza Strip belonged to other Arab states, and the inhabitants of these areas were not numbered among the Palestinians whose “homeland” Arafat sought to “liberate.” The only “homeland” for the PLO in 1964 was the State of Israel. However, in response to the Six Day War, the PLO revised its Covenant on July 17, 1968, to remove the operative language of Article 24, thereby newly asserting a “Palestinian” claim of sovereignty to the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

This ploy was revealed, perhaps inadvertently, to the West in a public interview with Zahir Muhse’in, a member of the PLO Executive Committee, in a March 31, 1977, interview with the Amsterdam-based newspaper Trouw:

“The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct “Palestinian people” to oppose Zionism. For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan.”

Arafat himself said the same thing, on many occasions. In his authorized biography (Terrorist or Peace Maker, by Alan Hart), he is quoted saying: “[T]he Palestinian people have no national identity. I, Yasser Arafat, man of destiny, will give them that identity through conflict with Israel.”

But such admissions did not stem the enthusiasm with which these fictions were greeted by Western leaders. Within a few years, the USSR’s invention of the fictitious narrative of Palestinian national aspirations and rights of self-determination created the façade of morality and legitimacy that the terrorists needed in order to curry favor with the European Union, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

Adapted from “Palestinians: Aggressors, Not Victims,” by David Meir-Levi (November 27, 2007).

©2023. Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

RELATED VIDEO: Clare Lopez, CIA analyst on Iran (Ret.) on some signaling on Iran’s participation on the war against Israel

Additional Resources:

End the Hoax: There Are No Palestinians
By Robert Spencer

Stolen History: How the Palestinians and their Allies Attack Israel’s Right to Exist by Erasing its Past
By David Meir-Levi
2011

Palestinians: Aggressors, Not Victims
By David Meir-Levi
November 27, 2007

Understanding the Palestinian Movement
By Historical and Investigative Research
April 22, 2006

The Rhetoric of Nonsense: Fabricating Palestinian History
By Alexander Joffe
Summer 2012

Founding National Myths: Fabricating Palestinian History
By David Bukay
Summer 2012

How Strong Is the Arab Claim to Palestine?
By Lawrence Auster
August 31, 2004

Palestinians: “Peoplehood” Based on a Lie
By Eli Hertz
March 31, 2008

Who Are the Palestinians? What and Where Is Palestine?
By Masada2000.org
2005

A Mid-East Fiction
By David Solway
November 3, 2008

The Truth about “Palestine”
By Steven Simpson
July 13, 2010

An Invented People
By David Meir-Levi
December 13, 2011

On The Usage of “Palestinian Arabs” in the 1920s
By MyRightWord.blogspot
March 9, 2011

Will the Real Nakba Please Stand Up!
By David Meir-Levi
July 25, 2011

How “Nakba” Proves There’s No Palestinian Nation
By Steven Plaut
April 30, 2008

VIDEOS:

Debunking the Palestine Lie
By Frontpagemag.com
September 19, 2011

Debunking the Palestinian Lie
August 3, 2013

Why Are There Still Palestinian Refugees?
By Prager University
May 2, 2016

BOOK:

The Palestinian Delusion: The Catastrophic History of the Middle East Peace Process
By Robert Spencer

VIDEO: A Call To The Civilized World thumbnail

VIDEO: A Call To The Civilized World

By Dr. Mordechai Kedar


Ladies and gentlemen, believers in democracy and modernity.

My name is Dr. Mordechai Kedar, a researcher of the Middle East and Islam.

Israel is at war.

A war between the Jewish state and Isis-like terrorists who believe that Jews should not have a state at all, should be subjugated to Islam, should be humiliated as it says in the Koran and should pay the jizia (head tax). According to their belief, if Jews dare to establish a state, even on their fore-fathers’ land, they should be exterminated.

On October 7th, in the early morning, Hamas attacked thousands of Israelis, for no reason. They murdered, raped, tortured and mutilated children in front of their parents and parents in front of their children and then shot them. It wasn’t enough to kill them however, and they desecrated the bodies, cutting of heads and burning them so that in some cases it is almost impossible to identify them.

Many of the terrorists filmed their barbaric acts and uploaded them to their social media.

Many Gazans followed the armed terrorists into Israeli territory in order to gloat, kill and loot. Others in Gaza went out to the streets and distributed sweets in celebration of this grand victory over the Jews.

Some 15 hundred Israelis and foreign nationals were murdered that day in cold blood. Entire families were wiped out and people who came to enjoy themselves at a music festival fell victim to hatred towards anything western. Statistically, 1500 Israelis can be compared in number to 45,000 Americans. 15 times the amount that were murdered on September 11th 2001.

Over 200 people were kidnapped and are held as hostages in Ghaza.

Hamas is the Palestinian tentacle of the Iranian octopus which has reached also into Lebanon, Hezbollah, militias in Syria, Iraq and Yemen, who are all preparing to wipe out Israel as per the orders of the Ayatollahs regime in Iran.

Israel’s struggle for survival is not only for Israel. If the jihadists succeed to destroy Israel, Europe will be the next and the Atlantic Ocean is not wide enough to keep America safe from this evil.

This is a war between good against evil, civilization against savagery, normalcy against barbarism. It is the struggle between western culture and the jihadists lead by Iran, who want to destroy it. Just imagine how the world will look like if Iran succeeds to acquire the doomsday weapon.

Your support of Israel will save you from this jihadist campaign against western values and culture.

Don’t stand idly by.

Thank you so much.

Dr. Mordechai Kedar

For Hamas Leadership, Beheading Is A Recommended Practice thumbnail

For Hamas Leadership, Beheading Is A Recommended Practice

By Middle East Media Research Institute

Palestine | Special Dispatch No. 10904

The horrors carried out by Hamas murderers in communities in southern Israel on October 7, 2023 included the beheading of adults and children. Confronted with harsh reactions to their atrocities, the Hamas leadership denied that the perpetrators were the organization’s own men whom they had proudly sent on a mission to kill Jews. They claimed that Hamas never does such things, and that the atrocities were committed by Gazan mobsters who had followed Hamas units into Israel.

However, in 2019 and again in 2021, MEMRI called attention to Hamas’s atrocities by publishing two translated video clips showing that for Hamas, slaughtering Jews is a practice that is acceptable – and even recommended.

Fathi Hamad, Hamas political bureau member and former Hamas interior minister in Gaza, said in a public address that aired on Hamas’s Al-Aqsa TV on July 12, 2019: “We will not die of starvation. If we die, it will be while we are killing you and cutting off your heads, Allah willing. […] There are Jews everywhere! We must attack every Jew on Planet Earth – we must slaughter and kill them, with Allah’s help […] If we die, we die – but we will die with honor, while attacking, and not while retreating! We will die while exploding and cutting the necks and legs of the Jews! We will lacerate them and tear them to pieces, Allah willing.” (emphasis MEMRI’s)

Two years later, on May 7, 2021, Hammad reiterated this threat in another public address, also aired on Al-Aqsa TV: “People of Jerusalem, we want you to cut off the heads of the Jews with knives. With your hand, cut their artery from here [indicating the place]  […] Buy a knife, sharpen it, put it there, and just cut off [their heads]. It costs just five shekels. With those five shekels, you will humiliate the Jewish state.”

Below are these two MEMRI TV clips of Fathi Hamad making these statements, from 2019 and 2021.

Senior Hamas Official Fathi Hammad Calls On Palestinians All Over The World To Kill Jews By “Cutting The[ir] Necks And Legs” – July 12, 2019

Hamas Political Bureau Member Fathi Hammad Calls on Palestinians All over the World to Slaughter Jews, Says: If Israel Doesn’t Lift the Siege by Next Friday, We Will Kill the Jews with Explosive Belts and Knives

EDITORS NOTE: This MEMRI column with videos is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.