VIDEO DEBATE: Does The God Of The Bible Exist?



Atheist Andrew Seidel “makes history” by arguing that he is BOTH an Atheist and an Agnostic at the same time! This is all you need to know about the absurd philosophical, contradictory beliefs of this Constitutional Attorney.


Seidel tries the Abraham & Isaac, “would you kill your son if God told you,” trick on Trento, similar to the “have you stop beating your wife,” trick. Though I was cut off from explaining my  purposely shocking “YES” answer to this silly question, either God would intervene as he did with Isaac or as I would have explained, I would not trust that it was actually the voice of God and would need further evidence. Predictably, Seidel takes this few seconds of debate and later screams out to all his trolling friends “Trento wants to kill his kids!” Predictably, his acolytes dance with joy. To the objective observer this is more indication of the moral bankruptcy of atheist Seidel.


As you watch, notice the remarkably immature and childish comments and reactions of Seidel when I am making key points that impact his position. This is typical with atheists who rely more on style than substance. At times he looks and sounds like a third-grader!  Honestly, I did not notice this during the debate as I was looking into the camera and not at Seidel. Very dumb of him.


At the end of our debate Seidel challenges me to debate him on the influence of Christians in politics. On camera, I absolutely agree. As of this Thursday Feb 25, Seidel has NOT responded to my efforts to organize that debate. I will keep trying and publicize whether Seidel responds or takes a pass. Nevertheless, here is his political position, whether he realizes it or not.

Seidel’s Atheism, the foundational belief of Marxism, has mounted a nationalistic attack against the beliefs of Jews and Christians. Atheistic Nationalism is the belief that the Secular State must completely destroy any influence of Jewish or Christian theology in any public entity or any public institution.

To Atheists, the STATE is god.

Atheistic Nationalism is totalitarian and destructive to the moral order, to human agency and completely antithetical to the Founders view of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.  Joining with these Atheist Nationalists are hard-core Marxists, Islamic jihadists, Big Tech oligarchs and the Biden Administration.

The ultimate objective of Seidel and this anti-Constitutional cabal is the “cancelling” of the voices of Christians and Jews, especially in the Public Square of politics, education and culture. Therefore, it is essential that believing Jews and Christians fight back against the emotional, non-logical, hateful campaign to “cancel” the monotheistic God of the Bible, thereby illegally obstructing the participation of Jews and Christians in the reformation of our great country!

©Tom Trento. All rights reserved.

Orlando Weekly and Hamas-linked CAIR hit CPAC for speaker who opposes jihad violence and Sharia oppression

First, smear opposition to jihad violence and Sharia oppression as “anti-Muslim.” Invoke the discredited far-Left smear propaganda organization, the Southern Poverty Law Center as if it were an infallible and impartial authority on what constitutes a “hate group.” Present the SPLC’s smears without any substantiating evidence, as if they were unquestionable fact. Throw in the word “extreme,” so as to abet the growing campaign to portray all dissent from the far-left agenda as terrorism.

Then drag in the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), identifying it only as a “civil rights organization,” without bothering to inform your readers that CAIR is an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas terror funding case — so named by the Justice Department. CAIR officials have repeatedly refused to denounce Hamas and Hizballah as terrorist groups. Several former CAIR officials have been convicted of various crimes related to jihad terror. CAIR’s cofounder and longtime Board chairman (Omar Ahmad), as well as its chief spokesman (Ibrahim Hooper), have made Islamic supremacist statements about how Islamic law should be imposed in the U.S. (Ahmad denies this, but the original reporter stands by her story.) CAIR chapters frequently distribute pamphlets telling Muslims not to cooperate with law enforcement. CAIR has opposed virtually every anti-terror measure that has been proposed or implemented and has been declared a terror organization by the United Arab Emirates. CAIR’s Hussam Ayloush in 2017 called for the overthrow of the U.S. government. CAIR’s national outreach manager is an open supporter of Hamas.

Note also that Presler isn’t even set to speak about anything related to Islam or jihad. Hamas-linked CAIR and far-left organs such as Orlando Weekly, or at least its reliably fascist writer Matthew Moyer, want to hound anyone who stands against them to their deaths. If you oppose jihad terrorism, Hamas-linked CAIR won’t just come after you if you ever speak about this in a public forum. It will come after you no matter what you’re doing, and try to intimidate event organizers, in this case CPAC, to drop you for your transgression of Sharia blasphemy provisions. If it were up to the left and Islamic supremacists, their critics would all be unemployed and unemployable, starving to death on the streets (at best). A few years ago I was invited to address an education conference in California that had nothing whatsoever to do with Islam; the hate-filled fascist “Islamophobia” propagandist-turned-real estate agent Nathan Lean got the weak and ignorant Catholic bishop Jaime Soto, under whose auspices the conference was being held, to cancel my appearance. (I spoke at the conference as scheduled, in a venue outside the bishop’s purview.) And also a few years ago, the Washington Post discovered that the Qur’an-burning pastor Terry Jones was driving for Uber; they duly got him fired. I don’t approve of book-burning, but it is not illegal in the United States, and the idea that a man must be hounded forever and prevented from making a living for views that dissent from the left’s reveals what Leftists really are.

So it has been clear for years that if you dissent from leftist orthodoxy, you must be destroyed. Not just “debunked” or “discredited” in your field, but also prevented from doing everything else, so that the only option you have is to die.

This smear of Presler is also ironic in light of the fact that when it comes to the jihad threat, CPAC, like all establishment conservative organizations, left the building years ago, barring all discussion of the actual nature and magnitude of the threat, and opting instead for comforting religion-of-peace fictions. This hit piece on Presler must have the cowardly Matt Schlapp quivering under his desk.

“CPAC speaker called out for anti-Muslim sentiments, and that’s only scratching the surface of this year’s spectacle,”

by Matthew Moyer, Orlando Weekly, February 25, 2021:

Another speaker on the lineup for the conservative mega-gathering CPAC is getting some unwelcome spotlight for anti-Muslim statements and activity, and this is only scratching the surface of the extreme ideologies being trotted out at this week’s event in Orlando.

On Tuesday, civil rights organization the Council on American-Islamic Relations called on CPAC organizers to remove Scott Presler from their conference lineup.

CAIR points out that Presler had been involved with “ACT for America” from 2017-2018 as an organizer. The Southern Poverty Law Center has characterized that organization as “an anti-Muslim hate group because it pushes wild anti-Muslim conspiracy theories, denigrates American Muslims and deliberately conflates mainstream and radical Islam.”

More recently, Presler was in Washington, D.C., for the Stop the Steal rally and even called the Jan. 6 insurrection the “largest civil rights protest in American history.”

Preslar is scheduled to participate in a group session on Saturday afternoon titled, ironically, “Front Porch Politics: How to Talk About Issues Without Starting a Back Alley Brawl.”

“CPAC organizers should immediately drop anti-Muslim activist Scott Presler, who has actively worked to promote conspiracy theories about American Muslims and Islam,” said CAIR Director of Government Affairs Department Robert S. McCaw. “Presler’s reported role in supporting the January 6 insurrection is enough to disqualify him from being offered a credible speaking platform.”…


Pensacola Jihad Massacre Victim Families Sue Saudi Arabia

UK’s Mirror claims decision not to allow ISIS bride to return means ‘if you’re brown you’re not really British’

New al-Qaeda top dog is former Egyptian general who wants to make the group as dangerous as it was under Osama

Nigeria: Muslims murder church elder and abduct three other Christians

Turkey: Yazidi slave girl rescued during raid to arrest senior Islamic State member in Ankara

India: Muslims who murdered Hindu activist scream ‘Allahu akbar’ inside police station

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Bill Clinton Ignored Genocide in Rwanda. Will Joe Biden Ignore it in China?

It’s not too late for President Biden to live up to his responsibility as the leader of the free world to make it clear to Beijing that there will be no business as usual with the United States until the Uighur genocide ends.

The Clinton administration chose not to call the mass murder of up to 800,000 ethnic Tutsis in Rwanda “genocide” because it felt the designation would legally require the United States to take action. And because it feared the political inconvenience.

President Joe Biden is now facing a similar political conundrum with the Chinese government’s ongoing genocide of ethnic Uighurs in the Xinjiang region. It appears that he is backing away from doing anything just as the Clinton administration did nothing to stop the genocide against Africans.

As a CIA analyst, I personally witnessed President Bill Clinton’s shocking dereliction of duty, along with that of his aides, during the April 1994 mass murder in Rwanda. The Clinton National Security Council instructed the CIA not to use the word “genocide” to describe these killings. This was because Clinton officials believed that the use of the word would compel the United States to take action under the 1948 Genocide Treaty, officially known as the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.

Even though Clinton officials had plenty of warning that mass killings in Rwanda could occur, it prevented the UN from acting in advance of the genocide. After the genocide began, the Clinton administration still prevented the UN from acting because of the political damage the administration had incurred from the failed peacekeeping missions it promoted in Bosnia, Somalia, and Haiti.

Future UN Ambassador Samantha Power wrote in a 2001 Atlantic article that a young National Security Council aide named Susan Rice stunned attendees at a late April 1994 NSC meeting when she revealed the political motivations for why the Clinton administration would not call the killings in Rwanda genocide.

According to Power, Rice said: “If we use the word ‘genocide’ and are seen as doing nothing, what will be the effect on the November [congressional] election?”

Rice confirmed that the Clinton administration was more worried about giving Republicans ammunition to attack its foreign policy than preventing the mass murder of Africans.

The following month, after downplaying the atrocities, Clinton officials admitted there may have been “acts of genocide” in Rwanda but would not say genocide took place, in order to avoid triggering the Genocide Convention.

Bill Clinton later apologized for the way his administration mishandled the Rwanda genocide. He passed the buck to his aides, claiming that he would have taken action had he known more about this situation. Numerous experts and studies have proved Clinton and his senior aides were well aware that genocide was taking place but decided to take no action and prevented other countries from doing so.

The Genocide Convention does not require going to war. It provides numerous ways to hold genocidal governments accountable including sanctions, travel bans on government officials, and refusing normal diplomatic relations.

Today there is undeniable proof that the Chinese government is committing genocide against its Uighur Muslim minority in Xinjiang.

Click HERE to read more.

Originally published by The National Interest


Fred Fleitz

Fred Fleitz, president of the Center for Security Policy, served in 2018 as deputy assistant to the president and to the chief of staff of the National Security Council. He previously held national-security jobs with the CIA, the DIA, the Department of State, and the House Intelligence Committee staff. Twitter @fredfleitz. View all posts by Fred Fleitz 

EDITORS NOTE: This Judicial Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

The Nation of Islam’s Revealing History

February 21 marked 56 years since the 1965 New York City assassination of the former Nation of Islam (NOI) leader Malcolm X by NOI members. The anniversary offers an occasion to reflect upon the bizarre, hateful history of this African-American cult and its disturbing implications for Islamic politics globally.

A valuable study resource on the NOI is the 2001 book The Nation of Islam: Understanding the “Black Muslims” by the Christian seminary professor Steven Tsoukalas. He examined the NOI’s “counterracist anthropology” that emerged under the shadowy Wallace D. Fard, who founded the NOI in 1930 in Detroit amidst a viciously racist American society. Fard only briefly led the NOI before disappearing in 1934, whereupon his “Messenger” Elijah Muhammad assumed NOI leadership until his death in 1975.

Under Muhammad, Tsoukalas explained, the NOI developed into what civil rights leader Martin Luther King in 1959 listed among America’s “black supremacist hate groups.” The NOI has the “basic premise that anything black is good and anything white is evil,” including Christianity, slandered by the NOI as the “white man’s religion.” The NOI’s “central myth” is that millennia ago the “infamous evil scientist Yakub” created the white race.

NOI racial separatism meant that Muhammad advocated the creation of a blacks-only state in America, Tsoukalas noted. To this end he, like Fard previously, organized planning meetings with Ku Klux Klan leaders, white supremacists who ironically shared Muhammad’s goal, albeit from opposed racist premises. Muhammad additionally had a “strange relationship” with American Nazi Party leader George Lincoln Rockwell, whom Muhammad invited along with other Rockwell followers to attend NOI temple services.

If all this is not weird enough, Tsoukalas examined how the “NOI’s doctrine of God is confusing and contradictory, fluctuating between monotheism and polytheism.” Accordingly, a “string of finite gods who each exist for about one to two hundred years” followed the first black god who created himself from an atom. Fard is the “present god of this cycle” who is still alive, a claim supposedly substantiated by NOI members who asserted to have seen him in the 1970s and 1980s.

The NOI’s theological farrago presents all manner of contradictions with Islamic beliefs and realities, as Muhammad’s 1959 tour of the Middle East and North Africa with his two sons revealed. With great public fanfare, the trio toured Islamic sites in Istanbul, Damascus, Beirut, Jerusalem, and Khartoum. In Cairo, President Gamal Abdel Nasser invited the Muhammad family to stay in his palace.

Yet Muhammad’s travels upended the NOI’s black/white dichotomy of Africans and other non-white people such as Arabs struggling against a “devil white race,” as Tsoukalas noted. What Muhammad

found was not the history Fard taught him. Africans exploiting other Africans for wealth and power, the fruits of the Arab slave trade of the nineteenth century; and Ethiopia’s slavery system all threatened Muhammad’s idealistic views. Muhammad was also unaware of Saudi Arabia’s enslavement of more than one hundred thousand Africans.

Shortly preceding Muhammad with his consent to the Middle East that same year, his NOI deputy Malcolm X had similar experiences, Tsoukalas observed. As with Muhammad, Nasser’s deputy Anwar Sadat and his entourage hosted Malcolm X as a dignitary at several social gatherings. But with Saudi Arabia’s legal enslavement of Africans, he “was rudely awakened to the first seeds of contradiction” with “Fardian Islam.”

Perhaps out of deference to Muhammad, Malcolm X refrained from traveling to Mecca. This allowed the “Messenger” to be the first NOI leader to enter Islam’s holy city, for he had announced before embarking that he and his sons would pilgrim to Mecca. However this travel would occur outside Islam’s hajj season and therefore qualify only as the al-umrah “lesser pilgrimage.”

Muhammad’s intentions to visit Mecca, a city closed to non-Muslims, raised grave theological questions, Tsoukalas noted. “After all, a most central, if not the central tenet, of traditional Islam was treaded upon and kicked in the waste bucket by Elijah Muhammad.” Contrary to all Islamic doctrine about a distant god beyond human comprehension and incarnation, he believed that “Fard is Allah in the flesh.”

Yet Muhammad entered Mecca without hindrance. Tsoukalas wondered why the “world of orthodox Islam would welcome someone whom it considers a blasphemer to make the sacred pilgrimage to the holy city.” Given the desire of Muslim state leaders to promote the anti-American NOI, “politics seems to have overruled the sacred.”

Muhammad and Malcolm X likewise suppressed any criticism upon returning to America, Tsoukalas noted. “Elijah made sure that major magazines and newspapers throughout the United States picked upon the successful trip, emphasizing his acceptance by the Muslim world.” Meanwhile “Malcolm X returned to America with glowing news from his excursion to the East” and, despite Saudi enslavement of Africans, “boasted about the lack of racial prejudice.”

Muhammad returned in 1972 to Islamic countries, this time accompanied by boxing star Muhammad Ali and several NOI leaders, Tsoukalas observed. A trip highlight was a personal invitation to visit Libyan dictator Muammar al-Gadhafi, whose regime, along with other Islamic countries, had financed NOI with millions of interest-free dollars. Despite the NOI’s “stark contradiction” to Islamic doctrine, Muslim leaders once again promoted NOI radicalism.

The NOI reception in the broader Muslim world, despite numerous NOI heresies such as its exclusion of whites, stands in stark contrast to mainstream Muslim treatment of the Ahmadis. Orthodox Muslims denounce this fringe group for claiming that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (1835-1908) is an additional prophet after Islam’s prophet Muhammad, a violation of Islamic doctrine concerning Muhammad’s prophetic finality. Ahmadis must conceal their beliefs in order to avoid a Saudi prohibition on Ahmadis in Mecca.

The NOI encounter with the wider Muslim world in turn has helped dispel myths that Islam is a more natural faith for non-whites than Christianity. Notwithstanding universal doctrines in both Christianity and Islam, sins of bigotry can occur among all faiths, not just in Jim Crow America. Indeed, Christianity provided the main impetus to abolish slavery around the world, from which Africans suffered so dearly, while Islamic doctrine perpetuated human bondage.

Nonetheless, NOI’s amicable relationship with self-professed orthodox Muslim regimes and individuals continues. American political activist Linda Sarsour has heaped praise upon the current NOI leader, Louis Farrakhan, a fellow anti-Semite. Dictatorships in Muslim countries such as Libya and Iran’s Islamic Republic have also welcomed Farrakhan on several occasions.

The NOI and its Muslim fellow travelers can only provoke cynicism among objective observers. Theological axioms and historical realities seem to matter little when various haters of Western societies make common cause. May the truth set NOI’s duped followers free.



Islamophobia: BBC Under Fire for ‘Hostile’ Interview of Muslim Leader

Victim families of 2019 Pensacola jihad massacre sue Saudi Arabia, say it knew Muslim airman was a jihadi

Bangladesh: Muslims attack and severely injure Hindu families, vandalize their homes

Henry Louis Gates claims the atrocities of Armenian Genocide were ‘exaggerated’ because of ‘Islamophobia’

Iran’s Foreign Minister: Islamic Republic lost $1 trillion to Trump’s sanctions, ‘expects’ Biden will pay it in full

Canada: Leftist government staffers investigated Jihad Watch writer who was later fired for criticizing Islam

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

VIDEO: NBC Goes Full On Nazi in Vile Anti-Jew Episode of ‘Nurses’

The left’s relentless campaign against the Jews is reaching critical mass, mainstreaming, dehumanizing the Jewish people.

Another disgusting and dishonest scene from an NBC television show to demonize Jews. Jewish law does not prevent medical grafts from different genders, but the far-left writers of “Nurses” don’t care. Its just awful.

Can you imagine if it was the Black community, or the Muslim community, or the LGBTQ community that was being slandered on a nationally televised show. All hell would break lose. The CEO of NBCUniversal is a Jewish American named Jeff Shell. Yet he allows these vicious blood libels and slanders to appear on some of NBC’s most popular shows. Shame on him.

With ‘Nurses’ Episode, NBC Again Shows it Detests Jews

By Israelly Cool, February 24, 2021

Following my post on Michael Che’s “joke” about the Jewish state only vaccinating Jews – a mendacious libel that can only serve to promote the idea that us Jews think of ourselves as above all other life forms – I received a torrent of abuse. Besides the overtly antisemitic tweets, there were those who claimed the joke was only criticizing Israel, and thus could not be construed as antisemitic.

I would like to see how these same people now try to explain away this latest example of overt antisemitism from NBC:

While Israel is not explicitly mentioned, this is promoting exactly the same idea as the SNL sketch – that Jews only value Jewish life and not the lives of non-Jews.

This is, again, entirely false. And maliciously so.

Judaism holds all human life as being sacred. For this reason, donating an organ to save a life is one of the highest act of virtue one can do. So of course a Jew can donate an organ (that you can live without when you are alive, or any organ after death, but under certain conditions) to save any human life, and can also receive an organ from Jew or non-Jew alike. We even see this in Israel where Jews and Arabs donate organs for each other’s use.

Here is a petition. You may also reach out to NBC at these e-mail addresses. Don’t be SILENT

E-mail addresses:,,,

RELATED ARTICLE: Saturday Night Live Finds Antisemitic Blood Libels Funny

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved. Quick note: Tech giants are snuffing us out. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense permenently banned us. Facebook, Twitter, Google search et al have shadowbanned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here. Help us fight. Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here — it’s free and it’s critical NOW more than ever. Share our posts on social and with your email contacts.

Palestinian Authority paid terrorists over $150 million in 2020

And the Left has the audacity to blame Israel for the Palestinian Authority’s inability to vaccinate their people. With the Biden Administration pledging to restore American aid to the Palestinian Authority, we can absolutely expect this number to increase dramatically.

Palestinian Authority paid terrorists over $150 million in 2020

The amount makes up 3.25% of the PA’s budget for last year, and is about NIS 5m. ($1.5m.) less than last year.
By Jerusalem Post, February 22, 2021

The Palestinian Authority paid more than NIS 512 million ($157m.) in salaries to incarcerated or released terrorists in 2020, Palestinian Media Watch reported Monday.
The amount constituted 3.25% of the PA’s budget for last year, it said in a report. The PA paid about NIS 517m. to incarcerated or released terrorists in 2019, it said.
The total amount paid to incarcerated or released terrorists in 2020 was more than NIS 512m. because those who had previously been employed by the PA continue receiving their salaries while in prison, according to PA budgetary regulations.

The PA also has a “martyr’s fund” for the families of those killed while committing or attempting acts of terrorism. It includes monthly salaries, free education, insurance, medical care and more.

PMW’s analysis of the PA budget found that it attempted to hide the terrorist payments, likely because of transparency required by international donors.
In 2020, the PA removed the category it once called the “Ministry of Prisoners’ Affairs,” through which the terrorist salaries had been paid in 2018-2019, in an apparent attempt to hide the payments.
However, Palestinian officials continued to tout the terrorist payments throughout the year and did not say they had stopped. Instead, the payments were funneled through the PLO, whose budget more than quadrupled last year, from NIS 161m. ($49m.) to NIS 673m. ($206m.).
The difference, NIS 512m., is the amount paid to incarcerated or released terrorists, PMW said.
The PA used this method for its terrorist payments in 2015-2017, it said.
Unlike the PA, which receives international funding, the PLO does not have accountability requirements for the international community regarding its budget.
Further evidence that the transfers to the PLO were for terrorists is that throughout 2020, they had a range of NIS 35m. to NIS 58m. ($11m.-$18m.) per month. However, in December, after the PA announced it would pay terrorist salaries for three months at once, the amount transferred to the PLO spiked to more than NIS 121m. ($37m.)

RELATED ARTICLE: TREASON: Biden officials, John Kerry COLLUDED with Iran behind Trump’s back to undermine his presidency

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved. Quick note: Tech giants are snuffing us out. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense permenently banned us. Facebook, Twitter, Google search et al have shadowbanned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here. Help us fight. Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here — it’s free and it’s critical NOW more than ever. Share our posts on social and with your email contacts.

HOLOCAUST HISTORIAN: Unregulated Big Tech Endangers Life, Liberty

WASHINGTON ( – An award-winning historian drew parallels between IBM’s cooperation with its assistance of the genocidal Nazi conquest of Europe to modern Big Tech companies that squelch free speech as well as monitor and shape behavior through computer technology.

Church Militant interviewed best-selling Edwin Black about the dangers Big Tech poses to civil liberties and the future of the United States. Big Tech consists of the world’s most dominant information technology corporations: Amazon, Apple, Google, Facebook, and Microsoft. As a chronicler of misdeeds by for-profit and nonprofit corporations, Black said he has long been concerned about what he sees as their overarching control over business and politics in the United States and much of the world.

Apart from a career as an investigative journalist, Black has written best-selling books exposing nonprofits and businesses. In War Against the Weak, for example, he linked the American eugenics movement and ethnic cleansing of the early 20th century to their flowering in Nazi death camps, while in Internal Combustion, he showed how shadowy agreements between corporations sabotaged alternative energy and vehicles and resulted in dependence on petroleum.

Twenty years ago, Black published IBM and the Holocaust, which exposed how IBM assisted the Nazi regime before and during World War II in organizing all six phases of its racist extermination program and the Blitzkrieg. Black described in his book, which has been translated into numerous languages and used at the university level worldwide, how IBM assisted the Nazis in warfare and the identification, exclusion, confiscation, ghettoization, deportation and extermination of Europe’s Jews. This was made possible by IBM’s celebrated CEO, Thomas Watson Sr., who operated from his New York City office through European subsidiaries.

Black has shown that without IBM, Nazism’s victims would have been far fewer. As he reiterated in a recent syndicated article, it was IBM that helped the Nazis actuate the “industrial, high-speed, six-million-person Holocaust, metering ghetto residents out to trains, then carefully scheduling those trains to concentration camps for murder and cremation within hours, thus clearing the way for the next shipment of victims, day and night.” It customized IBM programs that organized the pauperization, transportation and extermination of Nazism’s victims while ensuring “that the trains ran on time.”

In 1933, Adolf Hitler began planning the extermination of Jews and his other enemies. To put the dictator’s plan to identify and destroy his victims, there were no computers. But IBM and its Hollerith system of punch cards were available to Hitler. IBM was the Big Tech of its time and would later become a titan in information technology. It was IBM punch cards that could store information about people, places and processes based on how the characteristic holes were punched into rows and columns. The cards were then fed into high-speed readers and, Black wrote, created “something which had never existed before — organized information.

IBM, therefore, offered to the Nazis the ability to “not only count the people in a room,” he wrote, “but also count how many men, how many women, how many Jews, how many Christians, how many had blonde or black hair … every trait.” Every Nazi concentration camp, Black demonstrates, had an IBM customer site to assist in genocide. He wrote, “IBM has proven that some corporations can get away with murder and still function with impunity.”

Modern Big Tech Threat

Black has drawn a direct line connecting Nazi-era IBM and its crimes to the Big Tech firms of today. He wrote that the public’s fear of Big Tech’s ability to “surveil, censor and control our lives” around the world has piqued interest in “IBM and the Holocaust.” In January, the book was one of the top 10 books of any category on Amazon, and rocketed to #1 in WWII history, as well as military history, company profiles, and Jewish history. When he was asked whether he saw any similarities between the historic IBM and Big Tech of today, he said, “The parallels are manifest and frightening.”

Previewing a dark future, Black wrote that people need but look at IBM’s history of aiding Hitler before computers existed. He wrote, “Now is the time to ask what a Hitler-type regime could do today and how quickly with today’s high-speed hand-held technology?” He wrote that IBM punch-card tech delivered personal information to Nazi murderers, whereby the “Information Age was not born in Silicon Valley, but in Berlin in 1933,” thus producing the “individualization of statistics, identifying and quantifying a specific person within an anonymous count.”

“IBM and many Big Tech companies have used their technology to assist foreign governments, principally China, in oppressing, suppressing and repressing their people.” While identifying communist China as Big Tech’s principal beneficiary, Black said that China is using its social credit system and information technology in its “genocide of the Uyghur people and the subjugation of Hong Kong.”

“We should be outraged by this,” Black said, “but because we weren’t sufficiently outraged, Big Tech saw the opportunity and, not just IBM but Twitter, Facebook, Google and Amazon web services, to allow its worst activities to get a beachhead in the U.S.”  Reviewing the political scene, Black said, “Big Tech unforgivably manipulated the presidential election by molding and filtering our information, and in large part, preventing our communication about what we needed to know.”

“In other words,” he said, “like IBM in the Holocaust, Big Tech filtered society along its own lines. With Big Tech, the difference there was that IBM did it for money, what they have done in China was for money. What is being done in the U.S. is for political purposes.” He said, “Soon, that means that Big Tech will go beyond being just a tool of government and society, it will be a master of government and society. It will happen with a merger: they will be the junior partner, and the junior partner will move into the driver’s seat.”

Digital Ghetto, Social Credit Woes

In 2018, Black coined the term “digital ghetto” to describe how facts and history can be deleted with the click of a button to the benefit of corporations and partisan causes. Unelected governors and anonymous decision-makers ensure that news with which they disagree or wish to conceal is not heard or emphasized. In his conversation with Church Militant, he cited as an example how China has imprisoned 1 million Muslim Uyghur people, subjecting them to rape, torture and summary execution, with little publicity.

China’s communist government leads the world in manipulating news and social media, while it has also deployed a “social credit” system to further control its people. The social credit system is a series of interlocking databases that monitor and assess the behavior of nearly everyone in China. The communist government assigns its approval in the form of a credit score that, for example, affords priority in health care and housing for high scores, and punishment for low scores. Widespread video surveillance and cellphone tracking in China has expanded the reach of the government and threatens basic rights.

When Black was asked whether Americans should be concerned about Chinese-style technological controls, he said “All the surveillance and invasive control is no longer around the corner, it’s in our pockets” in reference to ubiquitous cell phones.

The phone is actually a computer attached to your body, he said, adding that phones can track their bearers within a room and interact with home computers and televisions. “When I was growing up, we worried about the knock at the door. Today you’ll have to worry about the ring of the phone,” Black said.

“If Apple and Google can disconnect platforms that they don’t like from their servers and their app stores, how long will it be before they decide people may not use their phones?” he asked.

Even worse, Black said that Big Tech may soon start running transportation with Apple and Google systems and autonomous vehicles: “They could strike you from their platforms, unplug you from their servers, deaden phone lines and restrict your ability to run from it all in a vehicle.”

To address what he sees as a threat to democracy, Black said that the various Big Tech corporations should be designated as utilities.

“Twitter, Facebook, web services, communication platforms, whether they are left, right or in-between: the Facebooks of the world don’t have the right to make the decision about our communications. They must be broken up and reduced to regulated utilities, like the telephone company.”

Black will discuss the threat posed by unregulated social media and Big Tech on his weekly online program, where he and his guests have discussed issues such as geopolitics, history and new authors.


Martin Barillas

©Church Militant. All rights reserved.

The Left Is Out To Demoralize America — We Cannot Let Them Win!

The left is out to demoralize America.  Both definitions of the word demoralize come into play in the case of leftist demoralization of America.  The first definition of demoralize is to “cause (someone) to lose confidence or hope; dispirit.”  The second definition of demoralize is to “corrupt the morals of (someone).”  If the left can cause people to lose their confidence or hope then they are more likely to fail their morals and fall to the corruption of the left.  Immorality is the left’s moral code.  We cannot let them win.

The left has no morals.   Truth is irrelevant to the left.  The left facetiously uses the word “equity” to disparage and discriminate against tens of millions of patriotic God fearing Americans.  The left makes up facts to meet their twisted agenda.  They twist laws to put right of center people in jail while ignoring laws that allow hardened criminals to run free in our neighborhoods and destroy cities.   The left’s hate for the values that the right cherishes is squarely in their bull’s eye for destruction.  The left is:

  • Repealing bail laws to let or keep criminals out of jail.
  • Not prosecuting laws that are intended to keep hardened, repeat criminals in jail and off the street.
  • Filling the ranks of top level national security positions with people who support the Council on American Islamic Relations, Antifa, Black Lives Matter and the Muslim Brotherhood.
  • Working to allow hundreds of thousands of foreigners with criminal records, terror associations, and cartel relations to cross our borders and stay in our neighborhoods every year.
  • Allowing unfettered entry into the United States from countries previously blocked because of their terror linked citizens.

Some people say the left’s extreme no holds barred policies that are focused on wrecking America are all about grabbing power.   So are millions of Americans really willing to turn their neighborhoods into havens for repeat, hardened offenders, illegal criminal aliens and imported terrorists?   Has the left’s zeal for power blinded them to the realities of what America will become under their reckless policies?  Maybe.  But I believe what motivates their blinded, reckless disregard for rational laws and public safety is their utter hate for people who are right of center, especially people of faith.

I am convinced after decades of being in the middle of the cultural battle to defend our values that the left has a deeply rooted hate for the God of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and Jesus.  Jesus is quoted in John 15:18-20 “If the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated me first. 19 If you belonged to the world, it would love you as its own. As it is, you do not belong to the world, but I have chosen you out of the world. That is why the world hates you.”  John 15:18-25 explains the spiritual nature of the left’s hate.

Thankfully, as long as we have a voice we must:

  • Stand with and show support for rational policies of public officials and oppose irrational ones.
  • Express support to judges that issue rulings congruent with the United States Constitution that defend our values.
  • Encourage judges to make America’s public safety the priority over political correctness and leftist intimidation.
  • Urge Corporate America to stop advertising with networks and websites that promote leftist propaganda that inspires hate toward Christians, Jews and conservative minded patriots.
  • Encourage companies to stop supporting public policies that side with leftist extremism.
  • Defend the people in the media who are boldly reporting the truth and naming the people who are advancing leftist extremism.
  • Call upon certain members of congress to oppose bills that advance leftist extremism.
  • Provide reports to Americans regarding the consequences of the left’s free pass to criminals and terrorists.
  • Call on state and local officials to fill in the gap left void by the Biden administration.
  • Pray that the impact of the left’s horrific policies will change the hearts and political thinking of millions of Americans toward sanity and civility.

Some Americans are despondent over the political and social changes that are taking place.  We must not be deterred.  We must continue to stand.  We will continue to stand and make a difference.

©Florida Family Association, Inc. All rights reserved.

Amazon banned Parler and Islamocritical book, still sells jihadi and Nazi material

By their fruits we shall know them, and so we know them.

Amazon banned Parler and Islamocritical book, still sells jihadi and Nazi material

By :On how Amazon’s Sharia-enforcing Brownshirts recently deleted a book that criticized Islam, see here. But the flag of the jihad terror group Hamas, which encourages and glorifies the murder of innocent civilians? No problem! The leftist oligarchy that controls nearly everything now has no problem with jihad violence and Sharia oppression, only with opposition to those things.“Amazon’s 103 Hate Items: Serial Killers, Nazi Symbols, and Terrorist Flags,” by Corinne Weaver and Alec Schemmel, NewsBusters, February 16, 2021:

Amazon deplatformed the social media site Parler for violent content, but it has no problem providing violent, terrorist or Nazi content to its customers.

A flag from the terrorist group Hamas, a beanie that has the word “lynching” emblazoned across it, and a shirt with the slogan, “All My Heroes Killed Colonizers” are proudly sold on Amazon. In a previous study, the company was found selling a “Kill All Republicans” T-shirt. A shirt with an image of Jesus Christ wearing the crown of thorns had the logo, “Kill Your Idols” across it. Several pieces of jewelry and articles of clothing promoting Nazi symbols are also sold on the platform.

Now that Parler has made its return after Amazon Web Services deplatformed it, it’s also worth noting Amazon’s hypocrisy. In a previous study, the Media Research Center counted 204 instances of violent merchandise sold on the platform. Thirty-seven of those items were eventually removed by Amazon, but 167 on that original list remain. Combined with the 103 on the new list, the Media Research Center has counted 270 hateful, violent products currently sold on Amazon.

Terrorist-Affiliated Flags and Symbols

Amazon allegedly doesn’t tolerate violence. Its policies state: “Amazon does not allow products that promote, incite or glorify hatred, violence, racial, sexual or religious intolerance or promote organizations with such views. We’ll also remove listings that graphically portray violence or victims of violence.”

That’s simply not true. Several products promoting terrorist groups were found on the platform.

green flag with the Shahada, or Muslim phrase that is the basic statement of the Islamic faith, can be found on Amazon. The flag is carried by Hamas, an Islamic group designated as a terrorist organization by the United States State Department in 1997. In the item’s product description, the vendor writes, “FlagDistributor does not necessarily endorse any meanings or connotations you may assign to this or any other flag, ‘Meaning, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder.’ We support the spirit of the 1st Amendment to the U.S Constitution; Censorship is UnAmerican and we don’t practice it.” The URL of the product states “hamas.”

Additionally, a ring with a seal that bears a resemblance to the Al-Shabaab terrorist group from Somalia is sold as well. In 2008, the United States designated Al-Shabaab as a foreign terrorist group. Robert Spencer, the director of JihadWatch, informed the Media Research Center that “The round design on the ring is not the exclusive property or design of al-Shabaab. ISIS used the same design on its own flags.”

Finally, a black flag with the shahada emblazoned on it is also sold on Amazon. This flag appears to be the same style of flag that former Al-Qaeda leader Osama bin-Laden posed in front of during videos.

Nazi Symbols

Amazon sells at least 100 items affiliated with white supremacy and Nazi ideology. Ninety-seven of those items include Nazi or white supremacist symbols and runes listed on the left-wing Anti-Defamation Legue’s “Hate Symbols Database.” Amazon recognizes that historical memorabilia has a place in this world, stating in its vending policies that the company “reserves the right to make a determination on the historical value of the item.” However, even among some of the stamps and coins with swastikas and other Nazi symbols, several modern pieces of jewlery, patches, flags and apparel with slogans such as “Team Aryan Lifetime Member” and other hateful dogwhistles like “#akia” (A Klansman I Am) remain on Amazon….

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved. Quick note: Tech giants are snuffing us out. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense permenently banned us. Facebook, Twitter, Google search et al have shadowbanned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here. Help us fight. Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here — it’s free and it’s critical NOW more than ever. Share our posts on social and with your email contacts.

VIDEO: Christian Palestinian unjustly held behind bars by Palestinian Authority appeals for help

In response to Jihad Watch’s recent articles about the suffering of Christians living under the Palestinian Authority’s thumb in Bethlehem, the birthplace of Jesus Christ, more information is flooding in that further exposes the Christians’ plight.

Moreen Botto contacted this writer regarding her husband Charlie Botto, who is behind bars in a Palestinian jail for signing her power of attorney for the management of his property in Jerusalem, as she is an Israeli resident.

The Palestinian Authority may justify the arrest on the pretext that the property may eventually go to Israeli businessmen, but an arrest such as this one becomes a powerful extortion tool while Charlie is held without any sort of arraignment. This Christian family today is being subjected to all sorts of extortion attempts.

People who live under the jurisdiction of the Palestinian Authority rely on their family members who are either permanent residents or citizens of Israel to take care of their properties inside Israel’s borders, also known as the “green line.”

As of October 2020, Charlie Botto has been in dire straits in a below-ground cell in what is known as Amer’s Prison, which is located near the Church of Nativity. This has been a cause of devastation for this Christian family.

While Moreen Botto’s elder daughters Mona and Cynthia attend colleges in Hebron and in Jordan, her three younger children Joe, Tatiana, and Julian still attend schools in Bethlehem at a time when Moreen is desperately trying to provide for her family by running a modest business. Meanwhile, she is keeping herself fully abreast of any new development regarding her husband’s imprisonment.

Moreen’s ordeal continues as she reaches out to senior Palestinian officials to make them aware of Charlie’s arrest, despite the fact that he is not expected to be tried.

In her effort to be heard, she has been subjected to financial blackmail by members of Fatah, who keep assuring her they will inform Ramallah’s attorney general of her plight, but to no avail.

The tragedy of this Christian family has been ongoing for almost two decades. Farah Botto, Charlie’s father was killed in front of his house in Old Bethlehem by Fatah militants in May 2001, when he refused to keep paying protection money.

As the Intifadah began in October 2000, many Christian Palestinians suffered abuses and extortion attempts as Yasir Arafat turned to terror and violence in order to put pressure on the political process initiated after the Oslo Agreement, which was signed in Washington, DC in 1993.

A few months after her father-in-law’s assassination in old Bethlehem, Moreen Botto was drving near Bethlehem University when she witnessed Fatah militia members begin shooting at Farid Azizeh, a prominent Assyrian, and former Bethlehem council member. Azizeh lost his vision and had a damaged memory for the rest of his life due to wounds in his head caused by the bullets.

Farid Azizeh was determined that the son of a senior Fatah member, who drove recklessly and ran over his nephew Ghassan, would not be entitled to walk free without prosecution. He refused to accept money in exchange for his nephew’s blood and insisted that the senior Fatah member’s son should be tried for reckless behavior while driving a stolen Israeli car.

The Fatah militants decided to silence Azizeh, while the perpetrator of the hit-and-run incident was sent to live in another country so as not to cause friction with another Christian family that also had lost a son in the same accident.

One may question why Moreen Botto felt the need to contact this Jihad Watch writer, who in discussion with her was candid about the risks she was taking while Charlie was being held captive in a Palestinian prison.

While Mrs. Botto fears for her husband’s safety since he is held in an unheated cell during the winter while the Covid pandemic has severely affected the Bethlehem region, she has turned to Jihad Watch as a last resort to expose her tragic current situation.

Moreen Bottos’s attempt to send her husband Charlie adequate thermal clothing was recently turned away by the Palestinian jailers.

By bringing this matter to the attention of the public, Moreen Botto hopes her Israeli residency would mitigate the possibility of Palestinian retribution while hoping that Christian organizations in the United States will hear her family’s ongoing anguish.

On the other hand, in describing the deteriorating health conditions of Charlie Botto, his eldest daughter Mona Botto broke into tears while she explained that her father had been hospitalized three times thus far due to a stomach infection contracted while being initially detained at the Palestinian Preventive Security detention facility in Bethlehem. Moreover, she said that a periodontal disease that spread to her father’s mouth also resulted in his teeth being removed.

Moreen Botto and her children hope to make their plea through Jihad Watch also be heard at both the US Department of State and the US Congress, and by bringing this matter to their attention end this Christian family’s continuous agony.

Many years ago, another family member was forced to seek refuge in the UK after mentioning the assassination of Farah Botto by Fatah militants in 2001. This came in the context of her attempt to call attention to the plight of Palestinian Christians living under the Palestinian Authority’s jurisdiction.

As a result, her family had to endure serious reprisals by the Palestinian Authority, which drove her to openly challenge late Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat during one of his lectures at a London university.

Exacerbating the suffering of Christians in the Palestinian Territories is the fact that the Church does not speak out on their behalf, whereas the propagation of dhimmitude among the clergy has increased the burden on Christians in the land of Jesus.


Samir A. Zedan is a former Senior Counter-Terrorism Analyst at the US Department of State, and a former Development Outreach and Communication specialist at USAID/Iraq. He also was a journalist with major media outlets with assignments in the Palestinian Areas, Israel, Jordan, Iraq, and Europe.


Palestinian Authority paid at least $156,000,000 to jihad terrorists in 2020

Christian Science Monitor: If You Don’t Like Public Schools Proselytizing for Islam, You’re a Racist

Syria: Yazidis ordered to use Islamic courts and follow Islamic law

UK: Illegal Muslim migrants complain about being ‘treated like criminals’

Islamic scholar: Muslims must ‘get rid’ of the Jews, once the world is ‘cleansed’ of Jews, there will be prosperity

Israel: Restaurant owner forbids blind man to enter with guide dog, says dogs unclean according to Sharia

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

CALIFORNIA: Muslim migrant indicted for attempting to provide financial support for jihad terror group

He is a Russian national. Was he vetted when he came to the United States? Of course not — not in any effective way, anyway. That would have been “Islamophobic.”


“Sacramento Man Accused Of Trying To Provide Financial Support To Terrorist Group,” 

CBS13, February 19, 2021 (thanks to Henry):

SACRAMENTO (CBS13) – A Sacramento man is accused of attempting to provide financial support to a foreign terrorist organization, the United States Department of Justice announced on Friday.

A federal grand jury on Thursday returned a single-count indictment against Murat Kurashev, 34, who is also a Russian national, according to Attorney McGregor W. Scott of the DOJ’s Eastern District of California.

Kurashev allegedly tried to provide financial support to terrorist organization Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, which is based in Syria….


DHS: ‘Right-Wing Extremists’ Committed Most Deadly Terrorist Attacks Last Year

Germany: Jesus figure beheaded, several fingers cut off

Nigeria: Muslims screaming ‘Allahu Akbar’ kidnap hundreds of schoolboys, shoot one student dead

Sweden: Muslim migrant who taught other Muslim migrants ‘how to behave’ toward women rapes a colleague

PA TV: ‘Israeli institutions are giving free training and grants to young Palestinians. This is an indirect attack.’

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

VIDEO: The Vortex — The Material World. Matter matters — a lot more than most people realize.


There is an extremely important point about the spiritual war raging all about us right now, and it is this: It occurs in the material world. What happens on earth matters, or, as St. Thomas Aquinas puts it, matter matters.

The problem with so many people in this spiritual war is that they play it out as if it is only spiritual and just say, “Whatever happens, happens. I’ll just pray.” Catholics of such mind retreat into piety, fooling themselves that faith without corresponding works is a perfectly fine, holy approach.

Nothing could be less Catholic. That rationale is for cowards. But over in the Protestant world, a similar mentality occurs: It’s called “quietism,” and it’s the notion that the material world doesn’t really matter — all you have to do is just pray and remain quiet.

In fact, this entire thought process actually began and flows out of a flawed understanding of Scripture and theology, going back centuries in Protestantism. Catholic sacramental theology embraces both matter and spirit; it does not reject one in favor of the other.

And because the seven sacraments have very tangible, material aspects to them, Protestantism, with its core anti-material mentality, rejects some or even all of them, dismissing God’s saving actions through matter in time and space. Think about this: Loads of Protestants think the only thing you have to do to achieve salvation is simply make some spiritual act of faith and, from there on out, everything is cool.

You’re saved regardless of your actions. Well, to drive home our point, those actions always occur in the material world, whether it’s adultery, lying, robbing a bank, refusing to vote or rationalizing going and voting for a child killer, it’s always expressed in the material reality.

We use our bodies, the same bodies that will be resurrected on the last day and reunited to our souls. Because of that resurrection of the material body, it is insufficient to think that somehow your soul can be pure even though it used your body to commit sins. And regardless of all that, you and your sinful body just get to waltz into Heaven because at some moment 40 years earlier, you blurted out at some random altar call “The Lord Jesus is my Savior,” and then went about sinning with that body of yours in the material world, thinking all your sins are somehow “covered”?

Well, what about your adding to the blotting out of the goodness of the material world with your body? Doesn’t that matter? What kind of a crazy, disordered theology is that?

Jesse Romero is our guest this week on Church Militant’s Mic’d Up, where we get into a deep discussion about the consequences in the political and moral order of disregarding the material reality we live in.

It’s a fascinating discussion about how all this plays out in our day-to-day lives, how just one little incorrect (and perhaps innocent) misunderstanding of theology can have a massive impact in the material order, which means politics, laws and how you are allowed to live your daily life.

So please join us and watch this week’s Mic’d Up, and share it with your friends. It’s a Church Militant Premium show, which means you have to have a Premium account, but that’s only $10 a month.

However, that same Premium account that allows you to view Mic’d Up also allows you to view thousands of other episodes of multiple Premium programs touching on a vast array of theological topics for your enrichment — which is especially helpful in this time of spiritual war.

EDITORS NOTE: This Church Militant video is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

VIDEO: On The Jihad Against India And The West

Robert Spencer on the jihad against India and the West with Kali Dasi.


New Jersey public school teaches students that Islam is the ‘true faith,’ objections dismissed as ‘Islamophobia’

UK: Leftist ‘human rights’ orgs enraged at ‘Islamophobia’ of chief of ‘counter-extremism scheme’ review

Islamic State Muslimas sue Sweden for violating their ‘human rights’ by not bringing them back from Kurdish camps

Bangladesh: Muslims rape Christian woman, local Muslims side with the attackers

France: University top dogs enraged as minister for higher education warns of ‘Islamo-leftism’

Iran’s Rouhani: Iran expects Biden’s handlers to make up for Trump’s ‘mistakes’

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch video is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Biden Nominee for Top State Dept. Spot Wrote About How Jewish Lobby Controls American Politics

Another anti-Israel appointment from the Biden Administration. Zionist Organization of America recently stated that the Biden administration “has made the worst group of appointments to cabinet positions with respect to US-Israel relations ever” and is “mainstreaming Jew-hatred at home.”

Another Jew-hater in the demented segregationist’s cabinet.

Biden Nominee for Top State Dept Post Contributed to Book About How ‘Israel Lobby’ Controls American Politics

Uzra Zeya nominated for undersecretary of civilian security, democracy, and human rights

By Washington Free Beacon, February 18, 2021

President Joe Biden’s nominee for a top State Department position played a key role in assembling a book on the nefarious influence of the “Israel lobby” while working for an organization that promoted claims about Jewish media control and dual loyalty to Israel.

As a staffer at the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, Uzra Zeya compiled research for a book that argues that “the Israel lobby has subverted the American political process to take control of U.S. Middle East policy” by establishing a secret network of “dirty money” PACs that bribe and extort congressional candidates into taking pro-Israel positions. Zeya, a former U.S. diplomat who was nominated for undersecretary for civilian security, democracy, and human rights, worked for the Washington Report and its publishing group, the American Educational Trust, in 1989 and 1990. The news outlet is staunchly anti-Israel and has published articles questioning the national loyalty of American Jews and opposing taxpayer funding to the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum.

Zeya’s work for the Washington Report and American Educational Trust raises questions about her views on Israel and could become an obstacle during her confirmation hearings. Biden’s recent hiring moves on foreign policy and conflicting statements from staffers have made it unclear how his administration plans to approach Israel policy issues. White House spokeswoman Jen Psaki recently declined to denounce the anti-Israel Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement, contradicting statements condemning the movement from Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Biden’s nominee for U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, the Washington Free Beacon recently reported. Biden also tapped anti-Israel activist Maher Bitar for a top intelligence post and is reportedly considering Matt Duss, an outspoken critic of Israel, for a State Department position.

Sean Durns, a research analyst at the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America, called the Washington Report a “fringe organization” that has “published content with anti-Semitic themes,” including claims that the Mossad was behind the JFK assassination and the Sept. 11 attacks.

“Organizations like the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs have a history of propagating fringe and sometimes anti-Semitic conspiracy theories and I think it’s absolutely fair for questions to be raised in any sort of potential hearings,” said Durns.

Zeya did not respond to a request for comment sent through her nonprofit the Alliance for Peacebuilding. The White House also did not respond to a request for comment.

Zeya was listed as one of the staffers who helped compile the research for the American Educational Trust’s 1990 book Stealth PACs: How Israel’s American Lobby Took Control of U.S. Middle East Policy, according to the acknowledgments section.

In a section titled “Jewish Power in the Formulation of U.S. Middle East Policy,” the book claims that the American Israel Public Affairs Committee gives American Jews secret marching orders on how to vote and which candidates to support financially.


Validating Anti-Semites in Power

Major Jewish groups split over Biden’s anti-Israel staffers

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. Quick note: Tech giants are snuffing us out. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense permenently banned us. Facebook, Twitter, Google search et al have shadowbanned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here. Help us fight. Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here — it’s free and it’s critical NOW more than ever. Share our posts on social and with your email contacts.

The Root of Cultural Decay is Feminism

Excerpt from Chapter 25, “The Root of Cultural Decay Is Feminism,” Rules for Retrogrades: Forty Tactics to Defeat the Radical Left, Timothy J. Gordon, David R. Gordon, TAN Books, 2020 (used with permission).

The family is the building block of society. It is the wellspring and training ground of future generations. It is the natural setting where the virtues are learned: piety, morality, prudence, frugality, decency, etiquette and every good thing for our youth. As the family goes, so goes society. It is precisely for this reason that the family has found itself under full-fledged radical assault in the past half-century.

If radicals succeed in rending asunder the family, in re-educating our kids, they will have won the culture. This is why Vladimir Lenin boasted, “Give me just one generation of youth, and I’ll transform the whole world.” The primary vehicle that radicals have used to undermine the family is feminism. It is a bald-faced lie that the purpose of feminism is to achieve “equal rights” for women. That’s merely the party line fed to the ignorant and the bitter. The animating purpose for feminism has always been the overthrow of the “patriarchy,” the headship of men in society and, particularly, in the family.

It is a little-known fact that, even as far back as the 1848 Seneca Falls Convention (the coming-out party for “first-wave” feminism), the attendant bluestockings declared, “The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpation on the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over her,” and that “In the covenant of marriage, [the wife] is compelled to promise obedience to her husband, he becoming, to all intents and purposes, her master.” Empowering women legally and politically is, for feminists, but a mere means to end patriarchy.

Once the rightful leaders of the family, fathers, are deposed, radicals know that they will be free to remake the family into an arm of their apparatus, or at the very least to dismantle it as a bastion of the old order. Like Maleficent from Sleeping Beauty, radicals fear nothing as much as the righteous, broad-shouldered man.

However, patriarchy will not lightly be cast off. It has been willed by God from the beginning of creation. This is the reason why Adam had authority over Eve (as evidenced by him naming her), even prior to the Fall, in the state of original justice. It’s why God empowered Abraham, Noah, Moses, Aaron, and Joseph to guide his people. It’s why Christ selected twelve men to be the princes of his Church. It’s why there continues to be, as a matter of Christian doctrine, an all-male priesthood. It’s the reason why, throughout human history, “There is not, nor has there ever been, any society that even remotely failed to associate authority and leadership in suprafamilial areas with the male” [Steven Goldberg, Why Men Rule: A Theory of Male Dominance (Chicago: Open Court, 1993), 15].

A rebellion against patriarchy is a rebellion against God himself — it’s a rebellion against the order and intelligibility of the universe. As with other failed systems like Marxism, when man attempts to set aside human nature, the consequences are dire. For years, feminists have been attempting to subvert marriage and family life in an attempt to disrupt patriarchy. They have tasted a great deal of success in their endeavor. No-fault divorce has become the law of the land, yielding a marital attrition rate of about 50%. Abortion, which “frees” women from maternal duties, is legal and rampant, producing 57 million human casualties in the United States alone since 1973.

Contraception, another insulator against the chief gift of marriage, children, is virtually ubiquitous, with 98% of sexually active women having used a contraceptive method at some point. Feminists have also taken to attacking motherhood, shaming housewives for being “lazy” and “unambitious” and pressuring them to take up needless glamor-careers for the sake of “empowerment.” Currently, 70% of women have abandoned minor-age children in exchange for careers outside the home, delegating mothering duties to disinterested nannies and sterile day-care centers.

As Pope Pius XII once lamented, when the mother is absent from the home, it becomes “desolate for lack of care,” with members “working separately at different hours in different parts of the city and hardly ever meeting one another, not even for the principal meal or for the rest at the end of the day’s work, much less for family prayers.” Even in many otherwise-functional, traditional marriages, the wife (contrary to scripture — e.g., Titus 2:5, 1 Peter 3:1–7 — and reason) has usurped her husband’s authority and headship over the family, resulting in a de facto leadership vacuum. Hen-pecked, uxorious men are now the rule.

Like Maleficent from Sleeping Beauty, radicals fear nothing as much as the righteous, broad-shouldered man.Tweet

The foregoing feminist machinations have produced wages of the most fetid sort. The culture has quickly become crass and despondent. Drug-addiction, pornography, violence and crudity abound. Mass shootings, which are almost always perpetrated by young men from broken homes, are now routine. Of a recent sample of 56 school shooters, a scant 10 were raised in a home with both biological parents. Studies show that “a father’s absence increases antisocial behavior, such as aggression, rule-breaking, delinquency and illegal drug use — especially among boys” [John C. Goodman, “Are Liberals at Fault for the Breakup of the Family?” Forbes, March 16, 2015.

Since 1999, the general suicide rate has increased by 33% in the United States. However, the female suicide rate has increased by 53% to the male’s 26%. For people between the ages of 10 and 24 years old, the suicide rate increased by 56% in the 10-year span between 2007 and 2017. What’s more, kids raised in a single-parent home are more than twice as likely to commit suicide as their peers raised in traditional homes. Even without poring over facts and figures, one can palpably sense that we’re living in a time of general Western malaise — an unseen specter has long haunted us, sending a frisson down the spine of society.

Feminism has failed to deliver even on its empty promises to women. In their paper “The Paradox of Declining Female Happiness,” economists Betsey Stevenson and Justin Wolfers analyzed women’s happiness trends between 1970 and 2005. To the surprise of many, they discovered that despite women’s newfound “liberation” and “progress,” female contentment scores decreased every decade from the time the survey was administered. In other words, despite a spate of new legal rights and protections, women are less happy than they were in the “dark days” of widespread housewifery. In 1960, women’s self-reported happiness was greater than that of men. By 2005, men were the happier sex. It’s clear that we’ve been sold a defective product.

Central as it is to the health of the culture at large, the family simply cannot be overlooked as the primary locus of the battle for the soul of society. Thus, if the retrograde is to rescue society from the clutches of radicals, he will have to do so by purifying and reinvigorating the family, the most noble and ancient of institutions. This necessitates that we discredit and decisively reject the saccharine hemlock of feminism and its contumacious rebellion against patriarchy.

Men, rise up and grasp firmly the mantle of leadership in your homes. Insisting on wielding your God-given scepter of authority isn’t bullying — it’s your sacred duty. Hold fast to your wedding vows; love your wives; teach your kids diligently; but flee from any temptation to cede your rightful authority, giving way to a practical matriarchy. If we diligently attend to our families, providing for them, educating them, loving them, guiding them and growing them, in one generation we will have taken back control of the culture from the deviants who have long plotted its demise.


David Gordon

David Gordon holds university degrees in political science, law and theology. He is co-author of Rules for Retrogrades: Forty Tactics to Defeat the Radical Left. Gordon is an associate copy editor at Church Militant and a co-host of the Resistance Podcast with Joe Gallagher.

EDITORS NOTE: This Church Militant column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

VIDEO: Ilhan Omar on Qatar TV calls on Biden’s handlers to back ICC ‘war crimes’ prosecution of Israel

She also supports the removal of the Houthis from the terror list. Surprised?

Actually, there is a surprise here. She says: “We have to look at this serious and devastating situation and do everything we can to hold the Chinese government accountable for this genocide that is taking place before our eyes.”

Most Muslim leaders have been quiet about the Chinese treatment of the Uighurs, preferring to focus their efforts on the weaker and more vulnerable West. And it’s extremely unlikely that China Joe’s handlers will challenge China — in fact, he just defended China’s treatment of the Uighurs. Will a split open up in the leftist camp over China?

“U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar: Biden Administration Should Support Referral Of Israeli Officials To The ICC; U.S. Should Hold Chinese Government Accountable For Genocide Of Uyghur Muslims,” MEMRI, February 12, 2021:

U.S. House Representative Ilhan Omar (D-MN), who serves as vice chairperson of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, expressed her support for the independence of the ICC and said that Israel and senior Israeli officers, who are accused of war crimes, should be referred to the ICC. She made these remarks in an interview with Al-Araby TV (Qatar) that aired on February 12, 2021. Omar said that Muslims should not just be a part of the administration in America, but they should also run for the office of president of the United States and take leadership roles in the country. Omar added that she welcomes the willingness of the current administration to cancel the designation of certain groups, such as the Houthis, as terrorists and to “restore some order and normalcy in regard to who belongs on that list [of terrorist organizations].” She also said that the Chinese government must be held accountable for the “genocide” against Uyghur Muslims and suggested that the U.S. might play its role like it did in Rwanda, Bosnia and “even in World War II with the Holocaust.”

Rep. Ilhan Omar: “We have certainly not seen high official appointment of Muslims by the Biden Administration, but there are a number of Muslims who are part of this administration. This is something we will have to continue to push for, in order to make sure that the Muslims remain an important part of the social fabric in the United States. They should not just be a part of the administration – but Muslims should also run for president, and take leadership roles in this country.”


Interviewer: “The new Secretary of State Antony Blinken said that the Biden administration would not return the U.S. embassy from Jerusalem, to which it was transferred by Donald Trump, and that this administration would continue to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. What has changed, then, from the Trump Administration?”

Omar: “It doesn’t currently seem like a lot will be changed, but there will be an opportunity for us to push for the United States to stand for its values and principles.”


Interviewer: “Should the Biden Administration support the referral of Israeli officials accused of committing war crimes to the ICC?”

Omar: “I do [support this]. It is also really important for us to remember that the international courts play an important role in rendering justice for people who are not getting justice within their borders. The U.S. should not delegitimize the ICC and the things it must do. It is shocking that the legitimacy of the ICC is something that is being questioned. Their ability to investigate, probe, and render justice is being undermined here in the U.S.”

Interviewer: “Will you demand that the Biden Administration and the State Department support the referral of Israel to the ICC?”

Omar: “I have. This is an important call and we all must guarantee that the ICC remains an independent body. It is an international court that has the authority and the ability to investigate and render justice for people who are denied justice within their borders. No sovereign state should stop the ICC from doing what they should do.”


Interviewer: “Do you support the removal of the Houthis from the terror list?”

Omar: “The last administration took a lot of actions, including the designation of certain groups as terrorist. We welcome the willingness from this administration to reverse course, cancel these decisions, and restore some order and normalcy in regards to who belongs on that list.


“It is definite that the genocide against the Uyghur Muslims in China is something that deserves serious attention from this administration. It also deserves the attention of every single person who is against the massive human rights violations in the world.


“The United States can play a huge role [in this regard]. As you know, the U.S. played a huge role in regards to the Rwanda genocide, it played a huge role in regards to Bosnia, and even in World War II with the Holocaust. We have to look at this serious and devastating situation and do everything we can to hold the Chinese government accountable for this genocide that is taking place before our eyes.”


Rashida Tlaib speaks at Kashmir event featuring jihad supporters

Biden’s handlers say they’re ready for negotiations with Iran

Amazon banned Parler and Islamocritical book, still sells jihadi and Nazi material

Stealing the West’s Cultural Heritage

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Vatican conference to promote Mary as ‘model for faith and life for Christianity and Islam’

Does the Vatican really think that this will increase harmony and mutual respect between Muslims and Christians? Vatican top dogs should consider a statement of the Muslim Brotherhood theorist Sayyid Qutb:

“The chasm between Islam and Jahiliyyah [the society of unbelievers] is great, and a bridge is not to be built across it so that the people on the two sides may mix with each other, but only so that the people of Jahiliyyah may come over to Islam.”

Dialogue, in other words, is all too often for the Islamic side a means of dawah, Islamic proselytizing, not a genuine discussion. In the Qur’an, the Virgin Mary gives birth to Jesus, but it is stated that he is not the Son of God (19:35), not divine (5:17), and was not crucified (4:157), and thus could not be and is not the savior and redeemer of the world. Do these Vatican officials really think that their Muslim interlocutors will discard what the Qur’an tells them and move closer to the Christian view? Or are they discarding the Christian view of Mary (and hence of Jesus) themselves, so as not to offend their “dialogue” partners? Almost certainly.

“Leave them; they are blind guides. And if a blind man leads a blind man, both will fall into a pit.” (Matthew 15:14)

“Vatican to organize conference promoting Mary as ‘model for faith’ for both Christianity and Islam,” by Jeanne Smits, LifeSite News, February 16, 2021:

February 16, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — “Mary, a model for faith and life for Christianity and Islam:” is the title of an upcoming series of online webinars presenting Our Lady as a bridge between Catholicism and Islam organized, among others, by the Pontifical Academy of Mary (Pontificia Academia Mariana Internationalis or PAMI).

Starting on February 18, ten weekly conferences will be given jointly by Catholic and Muslim speakers who will seek “dialogue, knowledge and cooperation” regarding themes such as “Mary, a woman of faith,” “God who is love and faith,” prayer, purity, hospitality and non-violence, fasting and penitence, fraternity and citizenship.

The Franciscan pontifical University of Rome, the “Antonianum,” is another co-organizer of the event through its Duns Scot Chair of Mariological Studies as well as the International Islamic-Christian Marian Commission and the Grand Mosque of Rome and its Islamic Cultural Center of Italy.

The Italian weekly Famiglia Christiana presented the event in the light of the Abu Dhabi declaration, illustrating its article on Saturday with a photo of Pope Francis signing the Human Fraternity Document together with Imam al-Tayyeb of the Al-Azhar University of Cairo.

Quoting at length from the Document, Gian Matteo Roggio commented: “The course of these webinars is therefore aimed at active, free, conscious, solidary and popular participation in the opening of this space of intersection, interconnection, hospitable reception, thus meeting the explicit requests of Pope Francis and the Grand Imam of Al-Azahr, the noble Sheikh Ahmad Al-Tayyeb.”

Readers of Famiglia Christiana in Italy are being asked to believe this: “The figure of Mary, a Jewish, Christian and Muslim woman, belongs by right and by fact to the path, the processes and the experiences that contribute to the generation of such an educational path, which makes a positive and confident wager on the embrace between generations and on a new politics and economy, where countries do not need to build their identity on contempt and on systematic negation, whether overt or covert, of the other and of others: an identity, that is, at the expense of the dissimilar and ready to identify in the other the cause of all the ills, failures, limitations and problems that instead have their multiple causes elsewhere. Belonging to these three religious and multi-cultural worlds (Judaism, Christianity, Islam), the figure of Mary is in itself a pressing and constant invitation to intersect and interconnect these same worlds, even making them a model of plural coexistence where the boundaries of each are made to allow communication, passage, exchange; and not to be closed, according to the many figures of exclusion that have, as their fruit, the culture, psychology, politics and economics of war, hatred and inhumanity.”

In the same grandiloquent style, Roggio added: “The webinars will end during the month of Ramadan with ‘the dates of Mary’ in the Conference Hall of the Great Mosque of Rome (health situation permitting): in memory of what is stated in the Holy Quran (Sura 19,22-26), namely that after giving birth near the trunk of a palm tree, she was called by the newborn child who told her ‘Do not be sad […] shake the trunk of the palm tree towards you and it will drop fresh and ripe dates on you. So eat them,’ a meal of friendship and fraternity will be shared once the sun goes down, as a tangible pact of alliance for the service to the common good of all, no one excluded, in obedience to the ‘understanding of the great divine grace that makes all human beings brothers’ (Document on human brotherhood for world peace and common coexistence).”

Roggio, the author of these very pro-Islamic lines, is not simply a journalist, he is a member of the religious order, the Missionaries of Our Lady of La Salette. He studied Mariology at the Pontifical Academy of Mary and is now a professor at the same institution. Roggio will be giving the lecture on “God who is love and mercy” on February 25, together with Islamic theologian Shahrzad Houshmand Zadeh, who teaches at the Gregoriana Pontifical University.

Roggio’s words therefore clearly express the spirit of the coming Islamo-Christian webinars: a spirit of profound relativism and misleading equation between the Catholic faith and Muslim beliefs.

The real question is this one: is the Virgin Mary whom we Catholics honor as the Mother of Jesus, only Son of God and the Word Incarnate, the same person as the woman named “Miriam” by the Quran? Is her son, Îssa, the Quranic equivalent of Jesus? He would then be a “Jesus” who could not in any way be the Son of God, because, the Quran proclaims, such an idea is “something monstrous” and that “it is not fitting for the Most Merciful to have a son.”…

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Muslim ‘Refugee’ Working as Anti-Rape Trainer is Arrested for Rape

He taught other Muslim Afghans how to behave against women – then he himself raped a colleague on the night shift- empowered by Leftists, Democrats, feminists who say nothing but work to import more rape jihad.

The Qur’an teaches that Infidel women can be lawfully taken for sexual use (cf. its allowance for a man to take “captives of the right hand,” 4:3, 4:24, 23:1-6, 33:50, 70:30). The Qur’an says:

“O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused. And ever is Allah Forgiving and Merciful.” (33:59)

The implication there is that if women do not cover themselves adequately with their outer garments, they may be abused, and that such abuse would be justified. (source: Robert Spencer)

This behavior is justified in the Qur’an. Islamic scholar Robert Spencer explains:

“Why did they not produce four witnesses? Since they produce not witnesses, they verily are liars in the sight of Allah.” — Qur’an 24:13

Because of the Qur’an-derived stipulation that sexual crimes can only be established by the testimony of four male Muslim witnesses, along with the Sharia provision that women’s testimony is not admissible in cases involving sex, it is not at all unknown that women are in prison for being victims of rape: their own charge against the perpetrator becomes self-incriminating when he refuses to confess and there are not four witnesses.

In Islamic law, it is normal: the seizure of Infidel girls and their use as sex slaves is sanctioned in the Qur’an. According to Islamic law, Muslim men can take “captives of the right hand” (Qur’an 4:3, 4:24, 33:50). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet! Lo! We have made lawful to you your wives to whom you have paid their dowries, and those whom your right hand possesses of those whom Allah has given you as spoils of war” (33:50). 4:3 and 4:24 extend this privilege to Muslim men in general. The Qur’an says that a man may have sex with his wives and with these slave girls: “The believers must win through, those who humble themselves in their prayers; who avoid vain talk; who are active in deeds of charity; who abstain from sex, except with those joined to them in the marriage bond, or whom their right hands possess, for they are free from blame.” (Qur’an 23:1-6)

A survivor of a Muslim rape gang in the UK has previously said that her rapists would quote Quran to her, and believed their actions justified by Islam. Thus it came as no surprise when Muslim migrants in France raped a girl and videoed the rape while praising Allah and invoking the Qur’an. And the victim of an Islamic State jihadi rapist recalled: “He told me that according to Islam he is allowed to rape an unbeliever. He said that by raping me, he is drawing closer to God…He said that raping me is his prayer to God.”

The Qur’an teaches that Infidel women can be lawfully taken for sexual use (cf. its allowance for a man to take “captives of the right hand,” 4:3, 4:24, 23:1-6, 33:50, 70:30). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused. And ever is Allah Forgiving and Merciful.” (33:59) The implication there is that if women do not cover themselves adequately with their outer garments, they may be abused, and that such abuse would be justified.

In this case, victim was eight years old. This could possibly have been because the perpetrators’ reverence for Muhammad led them to think of children as sexual objects. Islamic apologists in the West routinely deny that Muhammad consummated his marriage with (i.e., raped) Aisha when she was nine, and go through all sorts of contortions to deny the evidence of the texts, but the fact that child marriage is accepted in wide swaths of the Islamic world, even by the directorate of religious affairs (Diyanet) in once-“moderate” albeit now rapidly re-Islamizing Turkey, most clearly shows their dishonesty. The Diyanet wouldn’t approve of child marriage if it weren’t Islamic, as it explains in its own defense. And child marriage has abundant attestation in Islamic tradition and law.

“Islam has no age barrier in marriage and Muslims have no apology for those who refuse to accept this” — Ishaq Akintola, professor of Islamic Eschatology and Director of Muslim Rights Concern, Nigeria

“There is no minimum marriage age for either men or women in Islamic law. The law in many countries permits girls to marry only from the age of 18. This is arbitrary legislation, not Islamic law.” — Dr. Abd Al-Hamid Al-‘Ubeidi, Iraqi expert on Islamic law

There is no minimum age for marriage and that girls can be married “even if they are in the cradle.” — Dr. Salih bin Fawzan, prominent cleric and member of Saudi Arabia’s highest religious council

“Islam does not forbid marriage of young children.” — Pakistan’s Council of Islamic Ideology

Here’s the google translation of the Fraiitider article (Thanks to the Religion of Peace:):

Taught other Afghans “how to behave” against women – then he himself raped a colleague on the night shift

Published 16 February 2021 at 14.08

Domestic. A 24-year-old Afghan man is today sentenced by the Court of Appeal for having raped a colleague in the home care service during a night shift. The man previously worked at an HVB home where he was responsible for teaching other so-called refugee children Swedish rules and how to behave towards women.

The 24-year-old called the criminal charges “pure conspiracies” – until he learned of “certain forensic findings”. Then he claimed instead to have masturbated and had mutual intercourse with the woman in the office.

He also told of a dream he had that “a mouse or rat has entered my clothes and eats on my penis”.

However, the district court did not believe that explanation and sentenced the Afghan to two years in prison. And now the Court of Appeal has upheld the verdict.

The Afghan, who himself came to Sweden as an “unaccompanied refugee child”, previously worked at an HVB residence in Timrå. In a local tenant magazine, he was highlighted in 2016 and told how he was responsible for teaching other Afghans about how it works in Sweden, what rules apply and “how to behave” towards women. He explained that for many it came as a shock to come to Sweden and realize that women have rights.

On 11 August 2020, a rape was committed in the home care service’s premises on Gröndalsvägen in Tumba. During a night shift, a woman was raped orally, vaginally and anal by a male colleague. It all took place in an office, which was used by the staff for coffee and rest.

During a break at work, the woman fell asleep on a sofa in the office. She woke up to the man lying between her and the back of the sofa.

“She explained at once that she was not going to have sex with him, but he hugged her harder and harder. He said, ‘Don’t say that.’ “He put his body weight on her. She was lying on her back. In vain she tried several times to push him away with all her might. She finally gave up”, it is stated in the minutes of the verdict.

The woman was new to the job and at first did not dare to tell what had happened. It therefore took three weeks before she made a report. It was only after entrusting herself to a co-worker, who had reacted to the changing mood between the man and the woman in the workplace, that she informed her boss.

The police report was made on September 4 and on September 8, the 24-year-old was arrested.

Police secured DNA evidence
At first, the man denied the crime and claimed that no sexual intercourse had taken place. He called the charges against him “pure conspiracies” – until he realized that the police could have secured DNA evidence.

Then he began to change his story. In an attempt to explain why his semen could be on the spot, he claimed that the woman had undressed naked, asked for a massage and made approaches.

– She has touched me all over my body and you can investigate that she has touched me all over my body. She has touched me in intimate parts, he stated.

He is said to have found the woman’s behavior “unacceptable”, but still been “sucked, inflamed and hot” by her alleged approaches – to then have fallen asleep in the middle of it all and woke up with his underwear and work pants pulled down to half her thighs. He believed that the woman could have “done something” while he slept.

He also said he masturbated in the office a few nights before the rape.

“A rat eats on my penis”
During an interrogation, the Afghan suddenly wanted to tell a story.

– What happens when I sleep, I sleep deeply and dream that a mouse or rat has entered my clothes and eats on my penis. And then I wake up and scream and take off all my clothes.

However, he could not answer whether he had this dream during the night in question.

After being prosecuted, he wanted a supplementary hearing to be held. He then gave a new version of the course of events and claimed that he and the plaintiffs had carried out two voluntary intercourses, both initiated by the woman. That he had not told this before would be due to “that he was shocked and scared and already had a bad experience with the police. He was also afraid of the plaintiff’s boyfriend who threatened to kill him. He also has a wife and a newborn child; the situation was sensitive ”.

Receives minimum sentence and avoids deportation The
district court found that the woman’s story won “considerable support from another investigation” and sentenced the 24-year-old for rape. The sentence was two years’ imprisonment, but the sentence could have been longer.

The fact that the woman was exposed to the crime at her workplace can be seen as an aggravating circumstance, and the district court held that a longer prison sentence had been justified. Two judges also wanted to see the sentence extended by six months, but since the prosecutor did not demand a longer sentence, the sentence was two years, which is the minimum for rape.

The man must also pay damages of SEK 115,000 to the woman.

No request for deportation was made, which means that the Afghan may remain in Sweden after serving his sentence.

The Court of Appeal rules
After the verdict, the man wanted to replace his public defender with the left-wing lawyer Viktor Banke. However, the district court found no factual basis for this request, which was thus denied.

The 24-year-old appealed the verdict and today the Court of Appeal announced that the district court’s verdict is upheld.

Unaccompanied refugee children
The convict is a citizen of Afghanistan. He came to Sweden as an “unaccompanied child” and was registered in 2011 in Timrå. Today he lives in Järfälla. He states that he is married, but with the Swedish Tax Agency he is registered as unmarried.

Orignal By: Friatider

Onsdag 17 februari 2021

Undervisade andra afghaner i “hur man beter sig” mot kvinnor – sen våldtog han själv kollega på nattpasset
Publicerad 16 februari 2021 kl 14.08

Inrikes. En 24-årig afghan döms idag av hovrätten för att ha våldtagit en kollega i hemtjänsten under ett nattskift. Mannen jobbade tidigare på ett HVB-hem där han ansvarade för att lära andra så kallade flyktingbarn svenska regler och hur man beter sig sig mot kvinnor.
Gilla artikeln på Facebook

24-åringen kallade brottsanklagelserna för “rena konspirationer” – tills han fick vetskap om “vissa forensiska fynd”. Då påstod han sig istället ha onanerat och haft ömsesidiga samlag med kvinnan på kontoret.

Han berättade också om en dröm han haft om att “en mus eller råtta har gått in i mina kläder och äter på min penis”.

Tingsrätten trodde dock inte på den förklaringen och dömde afghanen till två års fängelse. Och nu har hovrätten fastställt domen.

Afghanen, som själv kom till Sverige som “ensamkommande flyktingbarn”, arbetade tidigare på ett HVB-boende i Timrå. I en lokal hyresgästtidning lyftes han år 2016 fram och berättade hur han hade ansvar för att lära andra afghaner om hur det fungerar i Sverige, vilka regler som gäller och “hur man beter sig” mot kvinnor. Han förklarade att det för många blev en chock att komma till Sverige och inse att kvinnor har rättigheter.

Den 11 augusti 2020 begicks en våldtäkt i hemtjänstens lokaler på Gröndalsvägen i Tumba. Under ett nattskift våldtogs en kvinna oralt, vaginalt och analt av en manlig kollega. Det hela skedde på ett kontor, som användes av personalen för fika och vila.

Under en rast på jobbet somnade kvinnan på en soffa på kontoret. Hon vaknade av att mannen låg mellan henne och soffryggen.

“Hon förklarade på en gång att hon inte tänkte ha sex med honom, men han kramade henne allt hårdare. Han sade: ‘Säg inte så.’ Han lade sin kroppstyngd på henne. Hon låg på rygg. Förgäves försökte hon flera gånger trycka bort honom med all sin kraft. Hon gav till slut upp”, står det i referatet i domen.

Kvinnan var ny på jobbet och vågade först inte berätta vad som hänt. Det dröjde därför tre veckor innan hon gjorde en anmälan. Det var först efter att ha anförtrott sig till en arbetskamrat, som hade reagerat på den förändrade stämningen mellan mannen och kvinnan på arbetsplatsen, som hon informerade sin chef.

Polisanmälan gjordes den 4 september och den 8 september häktades 24-åringen.

Polisen säkrade DNA-bevis
Till en början nekade mannen till brott och hävdade att inget sexuellt umgänge hade förekommit. Han kallade anklagelserna emot honom för “rena konspirationer” – tills han fick klart för sig att polisen kunde ha säkrat DNA-bevis.

Då började han ändra sin historia. I ett försök att förklara varför hans sperma kunde finnas på platsen påstod han att kvinnan hade klätt av sig naken, bett om massage och gjort närmanden.

– Hon har rört mig över hela kroppen och ni kan utreda att hon har rört mig över hela kroppen. Hon har rört mig på intima delar, uppgav han.

Han ska ha funnit kvinnans beteende ”oacceptabelt”, men dock blivit ”sugen, påtänd och varm” av hennes påstådda närmanden – för att sedan ha somnat mitt i alltihop och vaknat med kalsongerna och arbetsbyxorna neddragna till halva låren. Han menade att kvinnan kunde ha ”gjort något” medan han sov.

Han sade sig dessutom ha onanerat på kontoret några nätter innan våldtäkten.

”En råtta äter på min penis”
Under ett förhör ville afghanen plötsligt berätta en historia.

– Det som händer när jag sover, sover jag djupt och drömmer om att en mus eller råtta har gått in i mina kläder och äter på min penis. Och då vaknar jag och skriker och tar av mig alla kläderna.

Han kunde dock inte svara på om han haft denna dröm under den aktuella natten.

Efter att åtal väckts ville han att ett kompletterande förhör skulle hållas. Han gav då en ny version av händelseförloppet och påstod att han och målsäganden hade genomfört två frivilliga samlag, båda initierade av kvinnan. Att han inte berättat detta tidigare, skulle bero på ”att han var chockad och rädd och hade sedan tidigare dålig erfarenhet av polisen. Han var också rädd för målsägandens pojkvän som hotat att döda honom. Han har också en fru och ett nyfött barn; situationen var känslig”.

Får minimistraff och slipper utvisning
Tingsrätten fann att kvinnans berättelse vann ”beaktansvärt stöd av annan utredning” och dömde 24-åringen för våldtäkt. Påföljden blev två års fängelse, men strafftiden kunde ha blivit längre.

Att kvinnan utsattes för brottet på sin arbetsplats kan ses som en försvårande omständighet, och tingsrätten menade att ett längre fängelsestraff hade varit motiverbart. Två nämndemän ville också se straffet förlängt med sex månader, men eftersom åklagaren inte yrkat på längre strafftid blev påföljden två år, vilket är minimum för våldtäkt.

Mannen ska också betala ett skadestånd på 115.000 kronor till kvinnan.

Det gjordes inget yrkande om utvisning, vilket innebär att afghanen får vara kvar i Sverige efter avtjänat straff.

Hovrätten fastställer
Efter domen ville mannen byta ut sin offentlige försvarare mot vänsteradvokaten Viktor Banke. Tingsrätten fann dock ingen saklig grund för denna begäran, som därmed nekades.

24-åringen överklagade domen och idag meddelade hovrätten att tingsrättens dom står fast.

Ensamkommande flyktingbarn
Den dömde är medborgare i Afghanistan. Han kom till Sverige som ”ensamkommande barn” och folkbokfördes 2011 i Timrå. Idag är han bosatt i Järfälla. Han uppger sig vara gift, men hos Skatteverket är han registrerad som ogift.

RELATED VIDEO: Islam, Slavery and Kafirs

RELATED ARTICLE: Biden’s Iran Disaster: Iran-Backed Militia Fires Rockets At US Base In DEADLY Rocket Attack In Iraq

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Community Leader Who Stated, ‘All Lives Matter’ Is Fired From His Job To Appease Black Lives Matter—Lawsuit Filed

ANN ARBOR, MI – Rick Beaudin, a celebrated community booster, tireless volunteer and successful realtor in the town of Pinckney, Michigan, learned the hard way that publicly stating “All Lives Matter” will get you fired.  Beaudin was fired by Joseph DeKroub, the owner of Re/Max Platinum real estate company after having worked for his company for over 20 years.

Beaudin’s offense? On June 11, 2020, after seeing on a community Facebook page that Black Lives Matter (“BLM”) planned a protest in Pinckney, he responded from his personal Facebook page: “Can’t we all just promote in Pinckney That All Lives Matter?”

DeKroub fired him the next day to appease BLM—even though he had often touted Beaudin as one of the best promoters of his company.  Sadly, the owner he had loyally served for years swiftly fired him because he was concerned about possible retaliation from BLM mobs and boycotts.

As a result, the Thomas More Law Center (“TMLC”), a national public interest law firm based in Ann Arbor, Michigan teamed up with James K. Fett, a prominent civil rights attorney to push back on the “cancel culture” which had victimized Beaudin. On February 4, 2021, Fett filed a four-count civil action on Beaudin’s behalf in the Livingston County Circuit Court. The Defendants include an Unknown Associate of Black Lives Matter, Re/Max of Michigan, Re/Max Platinum and its owner, Joseph DeKroub (you can read the entire complaint linked below).

Rick Beaudin’s “All Lives Matter” post places him in good company.  Black leaders like U.S. Republican Senator Tim Scott and Ben Carson, the former Secretary of Housing and Urban Development and 2016 GOP presidential candidate, see nothing wrong with the phrase all lives matter.

Senator Scott, South Carolina’s first black senator since Reconstruction, said this on CNN’s “The Situation Room”:

“If it causes offense that I say, ‘all lives matter’ – black lives, white lives, police officers, jurists, all of us,  even politicians, all of our lives matter – if that is somehow offensive to someone, that’s their issue not mine.”

Doctor Ben Carson as a 2016 presidential candidate, said:

“Of course, all lives matter – and all lives includes black lives…. We have to stop submitting to those who want to divide us into all the special interest groups and start thinking about what works for everybody.”

Black Lives Matter (“BLM”) is a political movement that started in response to the 2013 acquittal of George Zimmerman, accused of murdering 17-year-old African American Trayvon Martin. The co-founder of BLM, Patrisse Cullors, has publicly admitted that she and co-founder Alicia Garza, are “trained Marxists.”

BLM has many faces: a Marxist revolutionary group that seeks to overthrow our government, a Twitter hashtag, and a political rallying cry. Whatever its form, BLM uses every opportunity to inflame racial tensions and incite anti-American and anti-police violence.  Astonishingly, despite BLM’s murky organization and affiliations, some of America’s largest businesses have donated millions to BLM including Amazon, Microsoft and Gatorade.

Clearly, “All Lives Matter” is meant as a unifying term that promotes racial equality.  Rick Beaudin had every reason to be concerned about a BLM protest in Pinckney.  It has been involved in scores of riots across the Nation involving deaths, injuries, looting and the destruction of businesses estimated at between 1 to 2 billion dollars.

Richard Thompson, president of the Thomas More Law Center, observed that, “BLM is a Marxist organization, virulently anti-Jewish and anti-American which seeks to incite race wars, chaos, and mob violence.  Its purpose is to destroy America by destroying her Judeo-Christian values and constitutionally protected right to free speech.”

Continued Thompson, “Just last week about 100 BLM protesters converged on Manhattan, New York in a defund the police demonstration which turned violent, injuring two police officers and resulting in 11 arrests.  Last year, May 30, 2020, in Fairfax, a Los Angeles community, BLM members vandalized 5 synagogues, three Jewish schools and looted Jewish businesses.  They chanted “F**k the police and kill the Jews.”

Click here to read the entire Fett complaint

©Thomas More Law Center. All rights reserved.

CALCULATED INSULT: Biden first president in 40 years not to contact Israel’s leaders upon taking office

He called Xi. He called Putin. But it’s clear now: Biden’s handlers intend to put immense strain on the U.S.-Israel alliance over the next four years. Trump was the most pro-Israel president since the founding of the modern state of Israel, and all he got for it were accusations of anti-Semitism. Biden’s handlers are clearly laying the groundwork for a massive betrayal of a nation that is on the front lines of the global jihad and has been a loyal ally, and he will be hailed as a great friend of Israel.

“Biden Makes History: First President in 40 Years to Punt on Contacting Israel,”

by Adam Kredo, Washington Free Beacon, February 12, 2021:

President Joe Biden is the first American leader in 40 years not to contact Israel’s leaders as one of his first actions in the White House, setting up what could be four years of chilly relations between America and its top Middle East ally.

Biden has already phoned multiple world leaders, including Russian president Vladimir Putin and Chinese president Xi Jinping, but during his 23 days in office has yet to speak with Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu—making Biden the first president in modern history to punt on bolstering U.S.-Israel relations during his initial days in office. Every president going back to at least Ronald Reagan in 1981 made contact with their Israeli counterpart within a week of assuming office, according to a review of news reports.

Congressional foreign policy leaders slammed Biden’s Netanyahu snub, prompting a flurry of questions for White House press secretary Jen Psaki, who has declined to disclose when or if Biden will call the Israeli leader. Psaki also said on Friday the White House would not list Israel as a U.S. ally when asked about the relationship during her daily press briefing.

Modern presidents going back to Reagan made calls or overtures to Israel during their first days in office, sending a message the United States would continue to stand for the Jewish state’s security. Biden’s diplomatic slight comes as Israel faces encroaching terrorist threats and the danger of a nuclear-armed Iran. He also has hired several individuals with a background in anti-Israel activism, including Maher Bitar, a top White House National Security Council official who spent his youth organizing boycotts of the Jewish state. The State Department’s Iran envoy, Robert Malley, also has been a vocal critic of Israel….

President Barack Obama, who faced criticism from Republicans for policies they branded anti-Israel, called the Jewish state’s leaders on his first day in office. Obama also called Palestinian leaders that day, laying the groundwork for that administration’s failed bid to foster peace between Israel and the Palestinians.

President Donald Trump not only called Netanyahu but made the historic decision to invite him to Washington, D.C., on Jan. 22, 2017, two days after he took the oath of office….


‘Palestinian’ PM says Biden’s handlers told him they’d restore aid, reopen PLO office in DC, open US consulate

Sharia-Enforcing Amazon Brownshirts Delete Book That Criticized Islam

NYC Mayoral hopeful Andrew Yang’s new campaign manager has close ties to Linda Sarsour

Sweden: Preschool ordered to remove suspected jihadis from its board or face closure

Switzerland: Muslim migrant sprays fashion model with acid

Syria accuses Israel of ‘aggression,’ says it intercepted Israeli missiles over Damascus

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.