What are the odds on Trump’s Modest Proposal for Gaz-a-Lago succeeding?
By MercatorNet – A Compass for Common Sense
Trump’s plan for Gaza is starting to make sense to me. It’s gonna work like this. USA Inc compensates each family in Gaza US$400,000 for their property (what Israel gave to the settlers it deported in 2005.). There are about 450,000 families, so the buyout will only be about $180 billion.
The US buys Greenland. The logistical wizardry which deported 10 million illegals will be used to fly 2.2 million Gazans to Greenland. Bulldozers will move in and transform Gaza into Gaz-a-Lago, a Middle East Riviera. Everybody’s gonna be happy. The Palestinians have new homes; Arab sheiks have new casinos; the Americans have a new base; Donald has a new golf course; Israelis have a new beachfront… What a deal! What could go wrong?
Like everyone else my brain has been scrambled by President Trump’s blitzkrieg attack on “the Deep State”, wokeness, illegal immigration, and everything else. Perhaps he has been studying The Art of War. As Sun Tzu wrote: “Speed is the essence of war. Take advantage of the enemy’s unpreparedness; travel by unexpected routes and strike him where he has taken no precautions.”
“Unexpected” is an understatement for Trump’s proposal for Gaza. It is not clear whether it is a serious proposal, or a brain explosion, or an opening gambit for a deal, or trolling. Or all of them at once.
On the face of it, it is utterly preposterous, something like Jonathan Swift’s satirical “Modest Proposal” for solving the problem of poverty in 18th century Ireland by selling and eating Irish babies.
Many, if not most, Gazans will refuse to leave their homeland. Hamas will rise again. Jordan and Egypt will refuse to accept them. Reconstruction will cost a motza. Not a single government will support American annexation. It’s a second Nakba, ethnic cleansing on a scale not seen since Arab governments expelled 900,000 Jews after 1945. US-occupied Gaza will be a magnet for terrorists.
But Trump is not delusional. As others have commented, we have to take him seriously, if not literally. What is the point of floating this surreal scheme?
It sweeps aside appeals to history and justice. Unfair? Yup. Inhumane? Maybe not. Trump is a meat-and-potatoes sort of guy, not a pie-in-the-sky sort of guy. A bad deal is better than no deal. “Gaza is a hellhole right now. It was before the bombing started, frankly,” Trump said at the press conference. And on Truth Social he predicted that Gazans would be “resettled in far safer and more beautiful communities, with new and modern homes, in the region. They would actually have a chance to be happy, safe, and free.” Let’s assume that he is sincere. His message to Gazans and the Arabs is that injustice with a house and a job is better than justice in a hellhole.
It exposes the bloviating of the international community about Gaza. Trump’s proposal is mad. But who has a better one? Not the Arabs. Not the United Nations. Not the EU. It is a kick-sand-in-your-face challenge to break Gaza’s cycle of construction and destruction.
It lays bare the lack of solidarity in the Arab world. Egypt and Jordan have refused to resettle the Palestinians, as have all the other Arab states. And no European states have even considered it. They could, you know. In 2015 and 2016, about 2 million refugees surged into Europe from Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan and other countries. Surely 2.2 million Gazans could squeeze in.
No more business as usual. No more failed orthodoxies. Trump is forcing the international community to make hard decisions, to be creative. If nothing radical is done, Gaza will be a cauldron of misery and hatred for generations to come. Its people deserve better.
Although Prime Minister Netanyahu was grinning with delight during Trump’s press conference, this lunatic proposal may have been a challenge to him as well. Trump could equally have said, You broke it, you fix it. Maybe he will.
As the Wall Street Journal commented in its editorial: “We doubt Mr. Trump has any appetite to send in the 82nd Airborne to occupy Gaza. We know the American people don’t. But perhaps his pitch will cause the rest of the world to do more to support a post-Hamas government in Gaza that would let Palestinians live in a territory that is better than hell on earth.”
Back to Sun Tzu: “Engage with orthodox tactics, win with unorthodox tactics.” After generations of misery in Gaza, will Trump’s unorthodox solution create a breakthrough?
What do you think of Trump’s proposal?
AUTHOR
Michael Cook
Michael Cook is editor of Mercator.
RELATED ARTICLE: Trump Shakes up Middle East with Plan to ‘Take Over’ Gaza
EDITORS NOTE: This Mercator column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.
This article is courtesy of DrRichSwier.com, an online community of citizen journalists, academics, subject matter experts, and activists to express the principles of limited government and personal liberty to the public, to policy makers, and to political activists. Please visit DrRichSwier.com for more great content.
