Grounds to Immediately Dismiss All Charges Against Trump thumbnail

Grounds to Immediately Dismiss All Charges Against Trump

By The Geller Report

The tyrannical indictment is 49 pages long. Trump faces a whopping 100 YEARS in prison if convicted of all charges and given the max on each one. This would mean he would die behind bars, which is what the Regime wants.

The moral rot and  extraordinary corruption and criminality is fast destroying the greatest country in human history. So exceptional was America, we will not see the likes of it again.

A destructive Trump indictment do prosecutors understand the forces they are unleashing?

Tom Fitton: Classified Docs Case Against Trump Is “A Lot Of Noise,” Grand Jury Testimony “Was Like Being On MSNBC.”

his is just a lot of noise to try to generate pressure on Trump, or pressure on the Justice Department to go after Trump. There’s no there there. How do I know that? Because I went before the grand jury and was harassed for four hours, where we argued about this Clinton-Sakharov case.

[ … ]

You go into the grand jury room, I don’t have a lawyer, so your lawyers are sitting outside. So if an issue comes up in the grand jury you have to consult your lawyer about, you have to leave the jury room. It’s a smallish room, 23-25 people sitting in there, it was full. And I had three prosecutors asking me questions about this issue about the records, the disputes about the Biden election, and my response generally is, “I don’t understand why you’re going after Trump when you protected Bill Clinton” and “Doesn’t the first amendment protect the ability to dispute elections?”

So it was a debate, it was like being on MSNBC for four hours.

FOX BUSINESS HOST: Did they try to intimidate you?

FITTON: They sure did, that’s how I took it. At one point, one of the prosecutors said, “Do you plan to talk about this testimony, what happened here today?”

I said, “I don’t know, maybe to my lawyers.”

And then he asked me again, “Do you plan to talk about it?”

I said, “I don’t know, it’s out there publicly.” And then he asked me a third time and i said I don’t know.

And then he said, “By the way, you are allowed to talk about it.”

I said to him, “You know, given your questions, it’s a little bit chilling.”

And so, he’s trying to get me to swear before a grand jury not to talk when I had every right to talk. That was so abusive and I’m still ticked about that. We may follow up on it.

Former top Department of Justice official blows up Jack Smith’s case against President Trump with one tweet

A key piece of information in the indictment is grounds for a quick dismissal proving Biden’s corrupt DOJ was the source of leaks RATHER than President Trump’s attorneys. Former DOJ Attorney Jeffrey Clark states that this finding is grounds for granting a motion indicating jury pool poisoning and dismissing the indictment.

[ … ]

I’m beginning to read the indictment against Trump. But even three pages in, it’s clear that the leaks that preceded the indictment are far too close to what is actually being pleaded by DOJ to be a coincidence.

For example, in paragraph 6a on page 3, we hear about the recording… pic.twitter.com/HP7YErumRf

— Jeff Clark (@JeffClarkUS) June 9, 2023

Here are the relevant parts of the tweet:

I’m beginning to read the indictment against Trump. But even three pages in, it’s clear that the leaks that preceded the indictment are far too close to what is actually being pleaded by DOJ to be a coincidence.

For example, in paragraph 6a on page 3, we hear about the recording of the Bedminster call, which the MSNBC’s of the world have been beating a dead horse about for quite a while based on such leaks.

This means that Trump lawyers could not possibly be the source of the leaks.

Ergo, the leaks are coming from DOJ. They must be investigated and punished.

Also, this is grounds for granting a motion highlighting jury pool poisoning and dismissing the indictment before it reaches even its one-month birthday.

All of this is so outrageous; it shocks the conscience. It’s fundamentally anti-American.

Keep reading.

I’ve carefully reviewed the indictment of Trump by his political opponents at the Biden Justice Department. (.@JudicialWatch has nearly 30 years of experience litigating federal and presidential records issues, including the famous “Clinton sock drawer” case.) The document…

— Tom Fitton (@TomFitton) June 9, 2023

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

RELATED ARTICLES:

Trump Indictment Fails Crucial Test: Dershowitz

Authenticated Leaked Video Shows D.C. Cops Were ‘Rioters’ and Instigators at J-6 Protest

RELATED TWEETS:

The question now is do we still have a Constitution. Does the rule of law still exist. That’s what we have to fight for pic.twitter.com/YYTCkHvZOV

— Josh Hawley (@HawleyMO) June 9, 2023

DONALD TRUMP IS FIGHTING FOR US !!
WILL YOU FIGHT FOR HIM ??

LETS MAKE OUR VOICES HEARD ALL AROUND THE WORLD CLICK HERE TO MAKE THIS #1 ON iTUNES https://t.co/GqeQ5yWV4G pic.twitter.com/OrmHBEDD2K

— Trumps Nephew (@ForgiatoBlow47) June 10, 2023

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.