When We Win Tuesday thumbnail

When We Win Tuesday

By Royal A. Brown III

Great advice from CS Bennet.

By CS Bennett

We need to get rid of this social credit scoring system the Chinese have imposed on their people and want to bring to our shores. Any US politician that supports this punitive system is a traitor to our republic and is a threat to our rights, freedoms, and liberties.

We need to restore all Americans’ right to display their guns in their gun racks in the back of their pickup trucks. We regain our liberties and freedoms by reversing the restrictive policies of the Left.

We need to abolish political correctness in the workplace, in our schools, in the halls of government, and in our places of worship.

We need to return civic classes to our school curriculum and prayer for those who ask for it.

We need to abolish Critical Race Theory (CRT) by any name the left gives it, in our school systems

We need to stamp out this woke movement by any means necessary

We need to establish what I would call Legal Layman Specialists, who are professionals trained to put into layman’s terms, all of that legal jargon you find on the amendments printed on voter ballots when you vote and haven’t a clue what is being said.

We need to keep politics out of sports, at the school level, and at the professional level. Let people relax and be entertained…

We need to restore election integrity and stop extending our elections past the general election day.

We need to hold our leaders accountable and true to the oath they swear, or affirm, when taking office.

We need to stop the out-of-control influx of illegal aliens across our borders and stop calling them undocumented immigrants. They are invaders.

We need to put a halt to this anti-American, anti-capitalist, anti-second amendment and freedom of speech movement by socialist and Marxist who live within our borders.

We need to continue to use cash, not digital money, so that the government has no way to account for every penny we spend. That’s our business, not the governments.

We need to put more emphasis on the rights of the Children of God, and less on what the LGBTQ wants to promote and change.

We need to vote into power those who understand that we have a US Constitution for the purpose of limiting government power and overreach and we need to vote people in who have the backbone to defend our rights and freedoms and protect and preserve our beloved US Constitution.

We need to do these things now, not later, and with conviction… As for those who win this Tuesday, you have got your work cut out for you. Let’s hit the ground running…

©CS Bennett. All rights reserved.

Trump is right DeSantis is ‘sanctimonious’ because he is filled with ‘religious devotion, piety & righteousness’ thumbnail

Trump is right DeSantis is ‘sanctimonious’ because he is filled with ‘religious devotion, piety & righteousness’

By Dr. Rich Swier

The legacy media always looks for a way to demonize, denigrate and divide Republicans. The latest attempt was to use President Trump’s off handed comment calling Florida Governor Ron DeSantis “DeSanctimonious.”

As Raw Story reporter Bob Brigham wrote,

Chris Brennan of the Philadelphia Inquirer reported, “Trump is now 40 minutes into his Latrobe rally and has spent far more time talking about Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clinton, Mitch McConnell (and his wife), Adam Schiff, Hunter Biden and others than he has about the guys he endorsed on Tuesday’s ballot, Mehmet Oz and Doug Mastriano.”

Trump then turned his attention to a poll of the competition to be the GOP 2024 nominee and had the numbers put on the big screen.

“We’re winning big, big, big in the Republican Party for the nomination like nobody has ever seen before,” Trump said.

“There it is, Trump at 71%, Ron DeSantimonious at 10%, Mike Pence at 7% — oh, Mike’s doing better than I thought,” Trump said.

What is most telling is that’s exactly what Governor DeSantis is sanctimonious.

Ron DeSantis is filled with piety, righteousness and is religiously devoted to those that he serves as governor of the Sunshine state. Ron DeSantis puts God and family first. His service to the nation in the U.S. Navy, in the Congress and now as Governor of Florida have one thing in common, duty to others over oneself.

Governor DeSantis is anything but hypocritical, rather he’s as honest and forthright as Abe Lincoln.

He has come to be know as TopGov because of what he has done for the people of Florida since his election.

DeSantis has made Florida pro-parent, pro-life, safe, secure, a great place to move to and start a business. He stands on his record and rightly so.

DeSantis has also turned Florida from a swing state into a deep RED state.

Floridians are set to reelect Governor DeSantis on November 8th, 2022.

President Trump, who lives in Florida at Mar-a-Lago understands this. President Trump has endorsed Governor DeSantis.

This comment has been both overblown and used to hammer DeSantis and Trump. It’s what Democrats do today. Why? Because they cannot run on their record, so they lie about their opponents.

It is becoming clear that President Trump 45 will run to become President Trump 47.

The question is not if, but what, position Ron DeSantis will hold in the Trump 47 administration.

Vice President? Secretary of Defense, after all DeSantis is a Navy SEAL. Secretary of State? The options are endless.

Or will Governor DeSantis stay in Florida for his full 4-year term and then run for President of the United States?

Governor Ron DeSantis is devoted to the 3 “Fs”—Faith, Family and Freedom.

We can envision a President Ron DeSantis 48 and 49.

How about you?

©Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

RELATED TWEET:

BREAKING REPORT: DeSantis camp crushes claims he met with Kevin McCarthy / Paul Ryan in effort to plot a 2024 primary against Donald Trump, calls them ‘completely false’…

— Chuck Callesto (@ChuckCallesto) November 6, 2022

Do Drug Expiration Dates Mean Anything? The Harvard Medical School’s Answer Will Shock You! thumbnail

Do Drug Expiration Dates Mean Anything? The Harvard Medical School’s Answer Will Shock You!

By Dr. Rich Swier

Have you ever gone to the place where you keep your prescription and over-the-counter drugs to look at their expiration dates? Do you throw out any of your medications because they have “expired” according to the manufacturer?

Well the Harvard Medical School looked into to expiration dates and their findings were to say the least shocking.

On August 29, 2020 Harvard Medical School’s Harvard Health Publishing released an article titled Drug Expiration Dates — Do They Mean Anything? The Harvard Medical School reported,

The big question is, do pills expire?

[ … ]

This is a dilemma many people face in some way or another. A column published in Psychopharmacology Today offers some advice.

It turns out that the expiration date on a drug does stand for something, but probably not what you think it does. Since a law was passed in 1979, drug manufacturers are required to stamp an expiration date on their products. This is the date at which the manufacturer can still guarantee the full potency and safety of the drug.

Most of what is known about drug expiration dates comes from a study conducted by the Food and Drug Administration at the request of the military. With a large and expensive stockpile of drugs, the military faced tossing out and replacing its drugs every few years. What they found from the study is 90% of more than 100 drugs, both prescription and over-the-counter, were perfectly good to use even 15 years after the expiration date.

So, the expiration date doesn’t really indicate a point at which the medication is no longer effective or has become unsafe to use. Medical authorities state if expired medicine is safe to take, even those that expired years ago. A rare exception to this may be tetracycline, but the report on this is controversial among researchers. It’s true the effectiveness of a drug may decrease over time, but much of the original potency still remains even a decade after the expiration date. Excluding nitroglycerin, insulin, and liquid antibiotics, most medications are as long-lasting as the ones tested by the military. Placing a medication in a cool place, such as a refrigerator, will help a drug remain potent for many years.

[ … ]

The next time you face the drug expiration date dilemma, consider what you’ve learned here.

Read the full article.

QUESTION: Why would pharmaceutical companies underestimate the expiration of their drugs?

ANSWER: Make more $$$$$ by getting you to throw away perfectly good drugs!

Today many are questioning what our three letter health agencies, e.g. FDA, DHS, and pharmaceutical companies are saying about drugs, including the various Covid vaccines and their side effects.

Many are concerned about the effectiveness of prescription and over-the-counter drugs and their side effects.

We highly recommend that individuals consult with their doctors to determine if a drug has truly expired, is effective and what are side effects, if any.

We have tended to trust our government agencies, especially those who deal with healthcare and disease control. However, many today are skeptical and even against following the advise of our government agencies.

As Ronald Reagan said, “Trust but verify.”

©Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLE: Liberal California Judge Just Gave Drug Dealers Permission To Deal Drugs!

Conspiracy Theory or Conspiracy Fact thumbnail

Conspiracy Theory or Conspiracy Fact

By The Geller Report

What once once considered outside the bounds of possibility and reason, seems entirely plausible, rational even, now.

Wait for it:

Wait for it… pic.twitter.com/ZjAmnFs3WS

— Darren J. Beattie 🌐 (@DarrenJBeattie) November 2, 2022

IF YOU BELIEVE

EXCERPT

The Burning Platform, November 4, 2022:

[….]

The government, their media mouthpieces, and most certainly the plethora of alphabet agencies wielding the real power (CIA, FBI, DHS, etc.) in D.C. created the term “conspiracy theorists” as a way to cover up their diabolical Deep State plots to rule the world from behind the curtain. The CIA coined the term in the wake of the JFK assassination as a method to discredit critical thinking Americans who questioned the validity of the Warren Report and the government cover-up of JFK’s murder by rogue elements of the U.S. government.

This was not the beginning of manipulation of the public mind by men we have never heard of. As expounded by the master of propaganda, Edward Bernays, the manipulation was already taking place during the 1920s. With the advent of mass media technology, the ability of these malevolent Svengalis to sway the masses towards believing whatever narrative they spin has expanded exponentially.

“The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of.” – Edward Bernays – Propaganda – 1928

[…]

I am under no illusions that the Republicans regaining the House and Senate next week will change the direction of the country. It would just be a speed bump temporarily slowing down our descent into the abyss. The Uniparty in DC, where both sides agree 80% of the time on frivolous spending, never ending wars, debasement of our currency, and limiting the rights of citizens, will continue to be funded and controlled by Soros, Gates, and other shady billionaires operating in smoky rooms where your opinions are not sought. The authoritarians will not yield without a fight. This sign in the upscale Capital section of D.C. on Halloween tells you everything you need to know about these brain damaged loons. They remain your enemy.

If you still believe JFK was assassinated by a lone gunman; the official story of what really happened on 9/11; that Epstein killed himself and numerous celebrities, politicians, and financiers aren’t pedophiles; the Federal Reserve isn’t controlled by Wall Street; Klaus Schwab and his WEF acolytes are not trying to Reset the world where you will eat bugs, own nothing, and be happy; Bill Gates is not creating viruses and investing in vaccine makers, while buying up farmland, as part of his dream to decrease the “surplus” population; Soros is not funding the election of communists whose sole purpose is to destroy the cities and states they are running; scientific experts like Fauci are not swayed by the vast amounts of money they are paid by Big Pharma to fake their research and ignore the deaths from these products; Covid was not the weaponization of the annual flu with a billion dollar marketing campaign used to implement government control of the population, which will be expanded during the next engineered crisis; January 6th was an armed insurrection; Putin is literally Hitler and the U.S. did not blow up the Nordstream pipelines while waging a proxy war against Russia; a drug addict nudist from Berkley with a pride flag and BLM flag hanging outside his dilapidated bus is a MAGA underwear terrorist and not a male prostitute picked up by Paul Pelosi; and the Democrats are not cheating again in these 2022 mid-term elections, you are the real conspiracy theorists.

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

RELATED ARTICLES:

Nazi Rhetoric: The View Host calls Republican women “roaches”

Midterms Horror: Republican candidate’s daughters, three and five, are almost KILLED after gunman opens fire at North Carolina home

NBC Historian: If GOP Wins ‘Our Children’ Could Be Potentially ‘Arrested And Conceivably Killed’

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

President Trump calls for the impeachment of Mitch McConnell, alleges blackmail thumbnail

President Trump calls for the impeachment of Mitch McConnell, alleges blackmail

By The Geller Report

I am so here for this. McConnell sold us all out years ago. That uni-party cow is the problem in our party.

Trump calls for the impeachment of Mitch McConnell, alleges blackmail

By Ryan King, Washington Examiner, November 03, 2022

Former President Donald Trump called for the impeachment of nemesis Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) Thursday, just days ahead of a midterm election in which McConnell could take the reins of the upper chamber.

While theorizing that McConnell could buck the GOP and collude with the Democrats to “blow the debt ceiling up,” Trump insinuated that the Democrats may have blackmail on him and argued that impeachment could be a remedy if McConnell betrays the party.

Trump’s retort was prompted when he was pressed by the host of American Sunrise on Real America News about Democrats “scheming” to collude “with some of the RINOs,” an abbreviation for Republicans in name only, “to blow the debt ceiling up.”

“Mitch McConnell keeps allowing [them] to have it. I mean, they ought to impeach Mitch McConnell if he allows that. Frankly, Mitch McConnell, something has to be — they have something on him. How he approves this thing is incredible,” he said in the interview.

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

RELATED ARTICLES:

SNAKE IN THE GRASS: Mitch McConnell Is Funding Lisa Murkowski in Alaska BUT NOT Blake Masters in Arizona (VIDEO)

RINO TREACHERY: Yes, Mitch McConnell Would Rather Lose The Senate Than His Leadership Status

Mitch McConnell And His Wife Elaine Chao Spent Decades Getting ‘Rich On China’

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Biden still hasn’t called Netanyahu to congratulate him on his victory thumbnail

Biden still hasn’t called Netanyahu to congratulate him on his victory

By Jihad Watch

The reason why is clear: Biden’s handlers support the “Palestinian” jihad.

No Call to Bibi: Biden Has Yet to Congratulate Newly Elected Israeli Leader

by Adam Kredo, Washington Free Beacon, November 4, 2022:

The Biden administration will not say when the president plans on calling newly elected Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu to congratulate him on his victory, drawing accusations the U.S. administration is trying to isolate the conservative Jewish leader before he even takes office.

Asked on Thursday afternoon if President Joe Biden has any plans to phone Netanyahu following his victory this week in the Israeli elections, a White House spokesman told the Washington Free Beacon, “We don’t have any call to preview at this point.”

The Israeli media reported on Thursday that Biden is expected to call Netanyahu some time over the weekend, citing the U.S. president’s packed schedule campaigning around America’s midterm elections. But the White House would not confirm these reports when asked by the Free Beacon.

Biden called Brazil’s newly elected far-left president-elect, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, on Monday, just a day after that country’s elections. This discrepancy is fueling accusations the Biden administration is taking a chilly approach to its diplomacy with Netanyahu, who made history by being elected as Israel’s prime minister for the third time.

Sen. Ted Cruz (R., Texas), a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, told the Free Beacon that the president’s delay in calling Netanyahu “is not an accident.”

“President Biden rushed to call Lula, a committed anti-American Chavista, but is finding every possible excuse not to call the next Prime Minister of Israel. That is not an accident,” Cruz said. “Biden has spent his entire administration undermining America’s allies and boosting America’s enemies. The next Republican Congress is going to leverage aggressive oversight and legislation to reverse that recklessness.”

This is not the first time Biden has been accused of dissing Netanyahu. It took Biden nearly a month to call Netanyahu upon taking office in 2021, fueling speculation Biden was trying to create some distance with Israel after four years of warm relations under former president Donald Trump. When outgoing Israeli prime minister Naftali Bennett was elected, it took Biden just two hours to call and congratulate him.

Omri Ceren, a national security adviser for Cruz, said reports that Biden is too busy campaigning to call Netanyahu are “nonsense.”

“Biden found time call [sic] Lula the day after his election—and that was on Monday so it’s not like Biden wasn’t midterm campaigning,” Ceren wrote on Twitter. “Also if he calls this weekend, it will still be before the midterms. Why can’t this [administration] just admit what their foreign policy is?”…

AUTHOR

ROBERT SPENCER

RELATED VIDEO: Will There Be A Conflict Between Bibi and Biden?

RELATED ARTICLES:

Snubbing Bibi: Antisemitic Biden Hasn’t Congratulated Newly Elected Israeli Leader On Landslide Victory

Dagestan: Imam enraged as four Muslim girls flee to Georgia to escape being beaten

Yemen: Shi’ite Muslims shell Sunni home, murder Sunni father and son

Islam’s Irrepressible Conflict with LGBT (Part Two)

Grand Imam of al-Azhar to Pope Francis: ‘Islam is a religion of peace and equality’

UK: Muslim jihad preacher returns to Twitter and challenges Elon Musk on free speech

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

When Equality Becomes Evil thumbnail

When Equality Becomes Evil

By Foundation for Economic Education (FEE)

Equality before the law is an indisputably good thing. Using force to make people equal is an entirely different story.


Memorize the following line, teach it to your children, and shout it from the rooftops every chance you get. It’s one of the most important truths you’ll ever learn or teach: Free people are not equal, and equal people are not free.

Your first reaction might be, “I thought equality was supposed to be a wonderful thing, something we should all strive for, but this sounds like a rejection of it.”

As the old saying goes, the devil is in the details. Whether equality is good or bad depends on the kind that you’re talking about. Context makes all the difference in the world.

Equality before the law—such as being judged innocent or guilty based on whether you committed the crime, not on what color, sex, or creed you represent—is an indisputably good thing. We should all want the law to be applied fairly and equally to all citizens. The blind-folded goddess of justice should never peek.

That kind of equality is a virtue and an ideal. It’s a pillar of Western Civilization for which untold numbers of men and women have given their lives.

The meaning of “Free people are not equal and equal people are not free,” however, is economic in nature. It refers to material income or wealth. Put another way, it might read, “Free people will earn different incomes. To ensure their incomes are equal, you must attack their freedom by using force.” This is the first of my “seven principles of sound policy,” as explained in this speech.

With elections just days away, I hope you will not vote for someone simply because that candidate is promising to steal on your behalf. To bow to such unseemly demagoguery makes the candidate a crook and therefore not to be trusted, and it would make you a craven accomplice whose freedom and independence can be bought with a handout.

Consider two violinists. One plays in an underground subway for whatever coins that passersby toss into his violin case. The other performs in concert halls before audiences of thousands. It does not matter that they may play the same tunes and be equally pleasing to the ear. The income of the first one will never come close to the income of the second unless and until he cleans up his act and finds himself a good marketer. This is economic inequality. It arises through no compulsion and reflects very different magnitudes of service to happy customers. It’s both natural and beneficial.

Deploying force to somehow make those two violinists equal in income would be stupid, counterproductive, and downright evil.

Even in unfree societies (such as Cuba or North Korea), we see inequality in incomes. The masses there live in quiet desperation while the political elites live in luxury. In the name of “equality,” such places not only fall far short of it, but they also produce tyranny and mass poverty in the effort.

Economist Milton Friedman stated this truth in a famous and memorable way: “The society that puts equality before freedom will end up with neither. The society that puts freedom before equality will end up with a great measure of both.”

One of my favorite movies is Enemy at the Gateswhich appeared in 2001. Disillusioned with the communist system, a Soviet propagandist named Danilov (Joseph Fiennes) heaves himself into the line of fire but not before he mutters, “We tried so hard to create a society where everyone was equal, where there was nothing to envy or appropriate. But there is no ‘new man.’  There will always be envy. There will always be rich and poor.” Then he adds, “Rich in gifts, poor in gifts. Rich in love, poor in love.” That is both common sense and profound.

Economic equality in a free society is neither obtainable nor desirable. Free people are different people, so it should come as no surprise that they earn different incomes. Our talents and abilities are not identical. Some work harder than others. And even if we all were magically made equal in wealth tonight, we would be unequal again in the morning because some of us would spend it and some of us would save it.

To impose economic equality, or anything remotely close to it, governments must issue these orders and back them up with firing squads and prisons: “Don’t work harder or smarter than others, don’t come up with any new ideas or inventions, don’t take any risks, and don’t try to be more successful than anybody else.”

In other words, don’t be human.

Consider the wisdom of this remark in a 1945 essay by Austrian economist F. A. Hayek: “There is all the difference in the world between treating people equally and attempting to make them equal. While the first is the condition of a free society, the second means, as De Tocqueville describes it, a new form of servitude.”

The fact that free people are not equal in economic terms is a cause for rejoicing. Economic inequality, when it stems from the freedom of creative individuals and not from government power and political advantages, testifies to the fact that people are being themselves, each putting his uniqueness to work in ways that are fulfilling to himself and of value to others.

People obsessed with economic equality do strange things. They become envious of others. They divide society into two piles: villains and victims. They spend far more time dragging someone else down than they do pulling themselves up. They’re not fun to be around. And if they make it to public office, they can ruin a nation. The envy that fuels their passions is at the root of many modern evils, as I explained in this essay.

The Nordic economist Anders Chydenius warned us in the 18th Century where the cult of redistribution leads: “The more opportunities there are in a Society for some persons to live upon the toil of others, and the less those others may enjoy the fruits of their work themselves, the more is diligence killed, the former become insolent, the latter despairing, and both negligent.” No economist worthy of the title believes that either freedom or prosperity can be built upon the dirty business of robbing Peter to pay Paul.

Philosopher Eric Hoffer, in his classic book The True Believer, offered an interesting explanation for much of the quest to make us all equal (https://fee.org/articles/the-wisdom-of-eric-hoffer-part-i/):

Those who see their lives as spoiled and wasted crave equality and fraternity more than they do freedom. If they clamor for freedom, it is but freedom to establish equality and uniformity. The passion for equality is partly a passion for anonymity: to be one thread of the many which make up a tunic; one thread not distinguishable from the others. No one can then point us out, measure us against others, and expose our inferiority.

For those who want to refresh their understanding of equality—the sort to strive for and the kind to avoid—I’ve assembled some excellent readings below. Please give them a look and share them with others.

This economic equality thing is parent to endless harm. When it’s just an idea, it’s nonsense. When it finds its way into public policy, it’s poison. Don’t drink it.

Equal But Not the Same by Edmund A. Opitz

Is Wealth a Sin? by Doug Stuart

Snowstorms or Snowflakes? by Lawrence W. Reed

Would You Rather Have Income Equality or Income Mobility? by Anne Bradley

Equality of Opportunity, Not Outcome, is What Made America Awesome by Hannah Frankman and Dan Sanchez

A version of this essay originally appeared at El American.

AUTHOR

Lawrence W. Reed

Lawrence W. Reed is FEE’s President Emeritus, Humphreys Family Senior Fellow, and Ron Manners Global Ambassador for Liberty, having served for nearly 11 years as FEE’s president (2008-2019). He is author of the 2020 book, Was Jesus a Socialist? as well as Real Heroes: Incredible True Stories of Courage, Character, and Conviction and Excuse Me, Professor: Challenging the Myths of Progressivism. Follow on LinkedIn and Like his public figure page on Facebook. His website is www.lawrencewreed.com.

RELATED ARTICLE: Why Elites Like Greta Thunberg Hate Capitalism

EDITORS NOTE: This FEE column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Will Elon Musk ‘free the bird’? I certainly hope so. thumbnail

Will Elon Musk ‘free the bird’? I certainly hope so.

By MercatorNet – Navigating Modern Complexities

European regulation of online speech will be a speed bump for the new owner of Twitter.


After a complicated, winding, and tense standoff between Musk and the Twitter board, as well as a pending legal trial at a Delaware Chancery Court, the eccentric billionaire finally agreed to abide by his original agreement and purchase Twitter in its entirety. Elon Musk is now the sole owner and CEO of Twitter. In typical Musk style, he wandered into Twitter headquarters carrying a sink, to “let that sink in.”

Musk has repeatedly expressed his disapproval of Twitter’s heavy-handed and politically inflected moderation policies, and has insisted on various occasions that Twitter ought to become an open and inclusive “digital town square,” where citizens of diverse political persuasions can exchange opinions freely. In a recent tweet aimed at advertisers, Musk said:

The reason I acquired Twitter is because it is important to the future of civilization to have a common digital town square, where a wide range of beliefs can be debated in a healthy manner, without resorting to violence. There is currently great danger that social media will splinter into far right wing and far left wing echo chambers that generate more hate and divide our society.

The notion of a “common digital square, where a wide range of beliefs can be debated in a healthy manner,” is the very opposite of Twitter today. Right now, Twitter is essentially a “safe space” to express Woke, leftist, pro-lockdown, and pro-Big Pharma opinions, and a very dangerous place for anyone who wanders from the fold of left progressivism or says something that could potentially endanger Big Pharma’s profits.

Twitter has been shamelessly suppressing inconvenient truths, if they happen to run against Twitter’s version of reality, in which Covid vaccines are about as safe as paracetamol, male and female biology are an assault on citizens’ rights to “gender identity,” and Big Pharma CEOs are altruistic saviours of humanity.

If this were just a silly game, the suppression of one side of the debate would be annoying, but no big deal. However, it is a game in which the stakes are extremely high. As things stand, Twitter is arguably the most important digital forum in the world, so suppressing important medical information concerning issues like vaccine harms and potential Covid treatments may literally be a matter of life and death.

The question is, can and will Elon really “free the bird,” as he so colourfully put it himself? Recently, in a query from Jordan Peterson’s daughter, Mikhaila concerning whether he can get her Dad back on Twitter, he has indicated that “anyone suspended for minor & dubious reasons will be freed from Twitter jail.” In a separate tweet, Musk has indicated that “Twitter will be forming a content moderation council with widely diverse viewpoints. No major content decisions or account reinstatements will happen before that council convenes.”

@elonmusk can you bring my dad @jordanbpeterson back on here but also somehow make sure he doesn’t spend all his time on Twitter? 🙃

— Mikhaila Peterson (@MikhailaFuller) October 28, 2022

It is true that Musk has, in the past, backtracked on important statements, including his original offer to purchase Twitter. But his stance in favour of free speech has been quite consistent, so I see no reason to doubt that he sincerely intends to “free the bird” from the heavily biased, politicised, and frankly Orwellian censorship policies it has been weighed down by for the past few years. Not to mention that it may be very good business to welcome non-lefties and non-Covideans back onto the platform.

If Musk manages to follow through on his free speech dream, then we could see the release of thousands of people from permanent Twitter “jail” over the coming months, including yours truly (Twitter handle @davidjthunder), as well as a radical revamping of Twitter’s anti-scientific and politically partisan moderation policies, which have served, principally, to protect certain scientists, politicians, and corporations from serious public scrutiny and challenge.

But dreaming is one thing, implementing another. Even if Musk manages to pull off the Solomonic task of keeping advertisers, investors, and customers more or less happy with his new moderation policies, he will also have to contend with governments that are increasingly enthusiastic about using their legislative and regulatory powers to shut down speech they object to.

I wish I could say that it only private actors like Microsoft and Google that suppress free speech. But it turns out that many of the people who currently stand at the helm of our governments, most notably in the European Union, seem to be determined to “protect” the public from what they happen to deem “dangerous or harmful” speech.

The aggressive regulation of speech by governments may come in the shape of notoriously malleable “hate speech” laws, which inevitably end up criminalising speech that is disagreeable to this or that political tribe, or “misinformation” laws that require people to only express opinions on matters of medicine and science that certain powerful actors in the political, pharmaceutical, and scientific establishment approve of.

It is worth noting that as soon as Musk announced that the “bird is freed,” Thierry Breton, EU Commissioner for the Internal Market, replied, “in Europe, the bird will fly by our rules.” He was referring to increasing efforts by the European Commission to clamp down on what they perceive as “misinformation” and to potentially impose enormous fines on Big Tech platforms that do not live up to the EU’s expectations concerning the regulation of “misinformation.”

👋 @elonmusk

In Europe, the bird will fly by our 🇪🇺 rules.#DSA https://t.co/95W3qzYsal

— Thierry Breton (@ThierryBreton) October 28, 2022

Twitter is one of the 37 signatories of the 2022 Code of Practice on Disinformation promoted by the European Commission, which includes a set of commitments which appear from the official website to rely heavily on self-regulation, even though the Commission monitors compliance with the code. Even if this code of practice is difficult to police in practice, it provides a political tool to pressure Big Tech companies into doing the Commission’s bidding.

What is especially worrying is the Digital Services Act, which was passed into law by the European Parliament on 5th July 2022. The Digital Services Act, as reported by Ecommerce Europe,

aims to set an ambitious framework to guarantee a safe and trustworthy online environment for consumers, mainly by introducing new obligations for digital service providers. Very Large Online Platforms (VLOPs), designated as ‘online platforms which reach a number of average monthly active recipients of the service in the Union equal to or higher than 45 million’, will have to comply with stricter rules, enforced by the Commission.

According to Thierry Breton, one of the Act’s most fervent advocates, one of the features of the Digital Services Act is that it introduces “a harmonised system to fight ALL forms of #illegal content – from counterfeit or dangerous products to hate speech. Any national authority will be able to request that illegal content is removed, regardless of where the platform is established in Europe.”

1️⃣ With great power comes great responsibility 🕷

 

The DSA is setting clear, harmonised #obligations for platforms – proportionate to size, impact & risk.#DSA

— Thierry Breton (@ThierryBreton) April 22, 2022

Breton goes so far as to suggest that the European Union could impose steep financial and regulatory sanctions for non-compliance: “The DSA imposes effective and dissuasive #sanctions. From #fines for breaches of obligations of up to 6% of global turnover to a #ban on operating in the EU single market in case of repeated serious breaches.” Don’t ask me if any of this would withstand judicial scrutiny. But the threat of massive fines and bans for non-compliance is coming from the highest level of the European Union, so I imagine Mr Breton has thought through the legal ramifications of these threats, and is not just bluffing.

🔟 A possible mechanism of #emergency response in the event of a crisis⚡️

 

We cannot rely solely on platforms’ goodwill when facing crises, pandemics or wars.

 

Europe needs a legal tool to require large digital players to react quickly in case of emergency.#DSA

— Thierry Breton (@ThierryBreton) April 22, 2022

To cut a long story short, if the laws of any given jurisdiction become an instrument of tyranny and Groupthink, Mr Musk will be put in a tough spot, and might find himself under enormous pressure to back away from his free speech commitments. That would feel like a terrible betrayal of his declared mission of creating an inclusive “digital town square.”

On the other hand, if Elon Musk is willing to fight the Eurocrats, he might be able to win some legal battles for free speech. Undoubtedly, the European Commission is flexing its muscles in the hopes of intimidating Musk into compliance. But if Musk cares about free speech as much as he says he does, he might just dig in and put the legality of the Commission’s threats to the test in a court of law.

All of this assumes, of course, that we can take Musk at face value in his fighting words on behalf of free speech. Only time will tell if that is true. But there aren’t too many glimmers of hope in the world of Big Tech and free speech these days, so I’ll take whatever breadcrumbs of hope I can pick up along the way.

This article has been republished from David Thunder’s Substack, The Freedom Blog.

AUTHOR

David Thunder

David Thunder is a researcher and lecturer at the University of Navarra’s Institute for Culture and Society. More by David Thunder

EDITORS NOTE: This MercatorNet column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Ibn Warraq’s ‘The Islam In Islamic Terrorism’ zooms to Top 100 at Barnes & Noble after being banned at Amazon thumbnail

Ibn Warraq’s ‘The Islam In Islamic Terrorism’ zooms to Top 100 at Barnes & Noble after being banned at Amazon

By Jihad Watch

Good to see people striking back against the fascists.

Ibn Warraq’s The Islam in Islamic Terrorism, after being banned at Amazon, has zoomed to #73 on Barnes and Noble’s charts. That’s out of all the books there are, kids.

Get your copy here.

Background of the controversy.

Amazon Fascists Ban Another Book That Leftists Hate

The battle for the freedom of speech is heating up this week, with Elon Musk chasing out the Twitter fascists and beginning to open up the platform for free discussion and dissent (amid howls of rage from the Left), but the other social media giants are showing no signs of retreating from their fascism. New English Review Press announced Sunday that a book it published back in 2017, The Islam in Islamic Terrorism: The Importance of Beliefs, Ideas, and Ideology by the renowned ex-Muslim scholar Ibn Warraq, has been pulled for sale from Amazon without explanation or the possibility of appeal.

It’s a strange move. I have the privilege and honor of having known Ibn Warraq for many years and calling him my friend. I’ve also read The Islam in Islamic Terrorism. Before I met him, his groundbreaking and courageous work Why I Am Not A Muslim was a powerful influence on me in the 1990s and had a great deal to do with my beginning to write about jihad violence and Sharia oppression of women myself. Ibn Warraq is a gentle soul, a careful scholar, a superb writer, and a profound and original thinker. The Islam in Islamic Terrorism is not some flame-throwing hate screed but a carefully documented exploration of the elements of Islam that jihad terrorists use in order to justify violence and make recruits among peaceful Muslims.

Amazon, however, is run by Leftists, and for Leftists, any criticism of Islam, including any hint that it may have some connection to Islamic terrorism, is “Islamophobic” and thus to be rejected out of hand without any discussion of the actual evidence. For years now, the notorious far-Left smear machine, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), has defamed opponents of jihad violence and Sharia oppression as “hate group leaders,” and Amazon has banned counter-jihad 501c3 charitable organizations from its Amazon Smile charity program on the basis of the SPLC’s “hate” listings.

Amazon has also shown a readiness to ban books that counter the Left’s nonsense. A few years back, the Leftist behemoth banned Ryan Anderson’s When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Moment. It has also banned other books that jihadis and their allies would find offensive, such as Peter McLoughlin’s Easy Meat: Inside Britain’s Grooming Gang Scandal, and Mohammed’s Koran by McLoughlin and British activist Tommy Robinson.

Leftists will say, as they always say to criticism of the social media giants, that Amazon is a private company that can do what it wants and that if patriots don’t like it, they can start their own bookstore. Remember bookstores? There used to be many in every American city. They all had different selections, based on the owners’ perspectives and interests. But now they are almost all gone. Amazon dominates the book market, and Barnes & Noble takes most of the rest. If Amazon decides that your book is not acceptable, then most people who are interested in books will never have the opportunity to see it at all.

In earlier, less polarized times, the U.S. government determined that several monopolies — Standard Oil, American Tobacco, AT&T — were not in the public interest and compelled them to break up. It would be a great boon for the freedom of speech if Big Tech were subjected to this treatment, but the U.S. government as it is currently constituted is more likely to act against Musk for protecting the freedom of speech on Twitter than against the other social media giants for suppressing that freedom. The American people would also benefit immensely from the breakup of Amazon and reconstitution of bookstores that reflect differing points of view with selections that reflect not just Amazon’s doctrinaire Leftist line, but other points of view as well.

The Islam in Islamic Terrorism can still be found here. But it’s clear that Amazon is intending to shut down debate on a highly controversial issue. Even if you don’t care for the works of Ibn Warraq (which would be odd, as it would mean you don’t care for lucid, elegant prose, compelling reasoning, and a broad command of the salient facts), make no mistake: anytime Amazon pulls a book for political reasons, we are all threatened. The precedent has been set by the only bookseller that really matters today that books that are offensive to the Leftist elites can be deep-sixed at will. This precedent is dangerous and corrosive to a free society. In this age of the Biden regime’s creeping authoritarianism, it’s ominous in the extreme.

AUTHOR

ROBERT SPENCER

RELATED ARTICLES:

Is Amazon Sabotaging a Pro-Trump Kids’ Book?

For Ilhan Omar, Is It All About the Benjamins?

Islam’s Irrepressible Conflict with LGBT (Part One)

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. All rights reserved.

The Biden Administration’s Proxy War on Free Speech thumbnail

The Biden Administration’s Proxy War on Free Speech

By The Daily Skirmish – Liberato.US

Hold on to your hats.  We’re going to be learning a lot more about the Biden administration’s efforts to silence free expression through its proxy stooges in Big Tech.

A federal judge just rejected the Biden administration’s attempt to stop depositions of government officials in a lawsuit alleging a wide-ranging conspiracy by the administration and Big Tech to censor free speech.  Anthony Fauci’s deposition is set for November 23rd.  House Republicans sent a letter to DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas calling him out for his agency’s role in censoring free speech.

More details about that role have come to light.  You might remember the agency’s Disinformation Governance Board that got shut down pretty quickly.  But DHS continues its efforts to curb free speech to this day.  Records from the conspiracy lawsuit, leaked emails and memos, and public documents show DHS pivoted to monitoring social media for the purpose of suppressing ‘misinformation’ the government doesn’t like about a wide range of topics, including the origins of COVID-19, COVID vaccine safety, and the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan.  Facebook created a portal for DHS and other government agencies to flag posts they don’t like, for quick action.  The portal is still in operation.  Facebook and the FBI won’t comment.  A previous report showed social media companies remove or post warnings on over a third of posts government agencies flag as objectionable.

Other agencies are also involved.  The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) on its own motion formed a misinformation team and expanded the agency’s mission beyond infrastructure to ‘building resilience to misinformation’.  The agency wants social media platforms to be more responsive to its directives.  An FBI official was criticized last year after falsely telling Congress the FBI does not monitor Americans’ social media posts.  The fact of the matter is the FBI has spent millions on social media tracking software.

Hunter Biden’s laptop shows you clearly why we do not want the government in the business of deciding what is true and what is false.  According to polls, many people would not have voted for Joe Biden if they had known the truth about Hunter Biden’s laptop.  But government officials called it ‘Russian disinformation’ and social media companies at the FBI’s urging dutifully suppressed the story before the 2020 election, a decision they now say they regret.  Thanks a bunch.

There’s really no difference between the government suppressing free speech and government officials getting private actors to violate the First Amendment for them.  That’s called the state actor theory and it’s at the heart of the Missouri Attorney General’s ongoing conspiracy case against the Biden administration and Big Tech where depositions are going forward and will soon give us a lot more information about all these bad actors violating your rights.

But there’s more.  The federal government paid four private companies to flag so-called ‘misinformation’ on social media during the 2020 election, resulting in the censorship of election coverage from conservative news outlets.  The CDC told Facebook COVID vaccines for young children are safe and effective when there was no evidence of that, all so the CDC could suppress contrary information through Facebook in a campaign to overcome ‘vaccine hesitancy’.  Twitter has a portal for CDC officials to flag COVID-related posts it deems ‘misinformation’.  Documents from inside Twitter show the White House pressured Twitter to ban a New York Times writer who was raising questions about phony government COVID narratives.  Facebook spies on private messages and reports users to the FBI for expressing ‘anti-government sentiments’, whatever that means.

The Biden administration is waging a proxy war on our free speech.  The social media giants are only too happy to play along.   But with 47 more government defendants recently added to the conspiracy lawsuit, the day of reckoning is drawing closer and I, for one, can’t wait to see these overbearing authoritarian government officials and their fascist buddies in Big Tech get hammered for messing with the First Amendment.

©Christopher Wright. All rights reserved.

Visit The Daily Skirmish and Watch Eagle Headline News – 7:30am ET Weekdays

RELATED TWEET:

LOVING THE NEW DNC AD!!!🤣🤣🤣 pic.twitter.com/0P8xl0mK0a

— il Donaldo Trumpo (@PapiTrumpo) November 2, 2022

Is It a Sin Not to Vote? thumbnail

Is It a Sin Not to Vote?

By Jerry Newcombe

In 1629, the first American balloting for an election occurred in Salem, Massachusetts. The issue? Choosing a minister and choosing a Christian teacher for the colony. “Such is the origin of the use of the ballot on this continent; [Samuel] Skelton was chosen pastor and [Francis] Higginson teacher.”  So writes George Bancroft, an early American historian, on this first election on American soil in Volume I of his 6-volume, History of the United States of America (1882).

Historian Paul Johnson writes in his 1997 classic, A History of the American People: “In a sense, the clergy were the first elected officials of the new American society, a society which to that extent had a democratic element from the start.”

And Christians in America have been voting ever since.

Founding father Samuel Adams once said, “Let each citizen remember at the moment he is offering his vote…that he is executing one of the most solemn trusts in human society for which he is accountable to God and his country.”

However, there has arisen a feeling among some professing believers that somehow it is spiritual to not participate in something as earthly as politics.

As the late Dr. D. James Kennedy, noted pastor and author, once said: “A Christian said to me, ‘You don’t really believe that Christians should get active in politics do you?’ And I said, with tongue in cheek, ‘Why, of course not, we ought to leave it to the atheists. Otherwise, we wouldn’t have anything to complain about. And we’d really rather complain than do something, wouldn’t we?’”

But today we find ourselves in such a mess in America that the very least Christians could do is vote, and vote our Biblical values.

Some people have written off elections because they think it’s all rigged. They look at some of the anomalies that have occurred in recent balloting, and they think, “Why should I even bother? My vote won’t count.” Well, if you don’t cast a vote, your potential vote certainly won’t count.

With great understatement, Gary Bauer notes in his End of Day Report (10/28/22), “We know unhinged leftists are not constrained by the basic teachings of Judeo-Christian civilization. They feel justified in doing anything and everything necessary to win.”

But if Christians show up in great numbers, we can overcome the potential for cheating because the Christian conservative voting bloc is huge.

About a decade ago, Alveda King, the niece of MLK, made some interesting observations about Christians and voting in an interview for television.

Alveda told me, “I hear remarks from both sides of the aisle. You know, ‘God’s not a Republican’ and ‘God’s not a Democrat.’ And so, we as God-fearing people don’t need to try to lock in a position to a political party, but certainly our votes must always follow our values.”

One of those values is against abortion and for life. Meanwhile, the left is embracing abortion to the hilt. When we vote Biblical values, we obey what the Lord would have us do.

Writing for the Washington Times (10/30/22), Everett Piper, a former president of a Christian college, opines on how far to the left the left has gone these days because of things like the castration of children and pornography in the schools: “The Democrat party is now so extreme that no serious follower of Christ can align with it. There is no longer any such thing as a ‘Christian Democrat.’”

The aforementioned Dr. Kennedy once declared that it is indeed a sin not to vote. His proof-text was from the passage in the Gospel, where Jesus said that we should render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar’s and unto God the things that are God’s (Mark 12:17).

On the issue of voting, he said: “For non-Christian Americans, voting is a privilege and responsibility; for Christians, it is a duty demanded by God that we should fulfill.” [Emphasis his]

It has been said that in America, we get the kind of government we deserve.

Historically, Christians in America applied their faith to virtually every sphere of life, including their politics. While the founding fathers were not all Christians, the vast majority of them were, and more importantly they had a Biblical worldview.

So, for example, they divided power, since they knew man is sinful. James Madison, one of the key architects of the Constitution, noted: “All men having power ought to be distrusted.” This is a Biblical perspective. Sometimes people complain that the Constitution limits the amount of power any one single branch may have. That was by design.

The only poll that counts is the one you cast at election time. Don’t sit this one out. As the late Bishop Harry Jackson once declared, “Too many people died for the right of all people in the nation to vote.”

©Jerry Newcombe, D.Min. All rights reserved.

TAKE ACTION: Tell Biden ENOUGH Regulations! thumbnail

TAKE ACTION: Tell Biden ENOUGH Regulations!

By Heritage Action

Between these two regulations, millions of franchise owners and workers will be in jeopardy of losing their jobs as the franchise business model would be destroyed.

Furthermore, independent workers such as truck drivers, freelancers, Lyft and Uber drivers, and more will be forced into an employer-employee relationship that strips away the advantage and appeal of being an independent worker. They will lose the ability to choose their hours or choose their clients.

Biden’s plans have all failed to help our economy, but as President Reagan also said “The more the plans fail, the more the planners plan.”

In the middle of an economic downturn restrictive regulations are the absolute last thing we need.

Help your fellow Americans—take two minutes to submit two comments to oppose these two rules!

Use our action center—Submit your comments now!

Janae Stracke

Director of Grassroots

Heritage Action

©Heritage Action. All rights reserved.

Red Wave Follows Democrat Crime Wave thumbnail

Red Wave Follows Democrat Crime Wave

By The Daily Skirmish – Liberato.US

Crime is now the third top issue in the elections, according to a new Gallup poll.   No wonder, with people being pushed onto subway tracks for no reason in New York and flash mobs looting stores in California.  Fourteen people, including children, were injured in Chicago on Halloween night after two shooters started firing randomly into a crowd.

Sorry, Chicago, but elections have consequences.  You elected Democrat Lori Lightfoot as mayor, the same Lori Lightfoot who defunded the police and refused to call out the National Guard to put down the riots in 2020.  She has admitted she has no idea how to stop the crime wave and has called on the feds to bail her out.  Democrats in Illinois also just passed a new law that will end cash bail after the 1st of the year for aggravated assault, second-degree murder, and other serious crimes.  This will free hundreds of defendants awaiting trial, so don’t expect the crime problem in Chicago to get any better any time soon.

You elect Democrats again this go-around and it is guaranteed the situation won’t get any better.  In addition to defunding the police and ending cash bail, the Democrat Party has brought you the Soros progressive prosecutors who are a problem in so many parts of the country.  Things are so bad in Philadelphia with progressive prosecutor Larry Krasner in charge of the District Attorney’s office there that state Republican lawmakers have moved to impeach him.  A murderer, whom Krasner freed from a life sentence last year, is back in custody on another murder charge.  “[W]e have heard devastating stories from victims of crime, businesses who are closing because they do not feel safe, and victims who have been revictimized by a district attorney’s office unwilling to help them when they would rather help criminals,” one Republican said.  Krasner called the Republicans fascists and a threat to democracy.  Gee, I’ve never heard that before.  I wonder where he got that line.

When confronted on TV with the obvious failure of his policies, Krasner claimed the murder rate is 40 percent higher in states Trump won than in states Biden won.  The claim comes from a progressive think tank and progressive authors, so you can take it with a grain of salt, maybe two.  But what cannot be denied is the fact that Democrats run all but one of the most dangerous cities in America and they have, in most cases, for decades.  The top 16 cities in the country for homicides are all run by Democrats.

Progressive prosecutors have wreaked havoc elsewhere.  One in Virginia freed a felon who went on to murder two men.  Another in Virginia freed a man from jail twice in a month who later killed a man.  A Democrat D.A. in Los Angeles failed to prosecute an illegal alien for domestic violence in 2019.  The man went on a stabbing spree in Las Vegas last month, killing two of his eight victims with a knife.

The tone for all this was set in 2020 when the rioters who burned down cities and injured 2,000 police officers got a free pass, for the most part.  There were only a relative handful of prosecutions in progressive and Democrat strongholds like Portland and Minneapolis.  This invited further criminality and the nation is now reaping the whirlwind.  Wrong direction – unless, of course, you like chaos and things spinning out of control.  If you do, be sure to vote Democrat in this election because the Democrat Party – by defunding the police, ending cash bail, and installing progressive prosecutors – will surely give you what you want.

©Christopher Wright. All rights reserved.

Visit The Daily Skirmish and Watch Eagle Headline News – 7:30am ET Weekdays

Election Investigative Journalists Arrested After Refusing to Reveal Confidential Informant thumbnail

Election Investigative Journalists Arrested After Refusing to Reveal Confidential Informant

By The Geller Report

Why weren’t Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein jailed? Or Daniel Ellsberg for his Pentagon Papers?

Catherine Engelbrecht and Gregg Phillips should be given the same protections as the sleazeball media (i.e. NYT, WaPo etc.)

Catherine Engelbrecht and Gregg Phillips are national heroes. They should be given the Presidential Medal of Freedom but in a country hijacked by the party of treason, they are prosecuted.

BREAKING: True the Vote leaders arrested after refusing to reveal confidential informant

By: Hannah Nightingale, The Post Millenial, Oct 31, 2022:

Hoyt ordered that Engelbrcht and Phillips be held in custody for at least a day, until they divulge that information.

On Monday, US Marshalls took into custody Catherine Engelbrecht and Gregg Phillips of True the Vote, for refusing to identify a confidential informant.

Federal Judge Kenneth Hoyt delivered the order, holding the two in contempt of court for refusing to identify the informant, according to independent journalist Ivory Hecker.

Hoyt ordered that Engelbrcht and Phillips be held in custody for at least a day, until they divulge that information.

“Judge says he never got a straight answer on who was in the Dallas hotel room January, 2021, and he doesn’t know how many people were there. Judge says the way Phillips and Engelbrecht talked suggests True the Vote did have access to the hacked computer data, though they deny it,” Hecker wrote on Twitter.

According to the Houston Chronicle, Engelbrecht and Phillips testified that identifying the confidential informant would put his life at risk.

“Every name I give you gets doxxed and harassed,” Engelbrecht said.

The arrest of the pair is the latest in a civil suit filed in September by Konnech, a Michigan-based company that provides software to elections offices regarding poll worker management, according to Votebeat Texas.

Kenneth alleged that True the Vote made “baseless and racist” accusations against CEO Eugene Yu, which forced him and his family to flee their home.

Yu was arrested and charged by the Los Angeles district attorney for allegedly storing government data in China, which is in breach of the company’s contract. LA officials reportedly received their initial tip regarding Yu from Phillips.

At the center of the issue was the name and contact information of individuals that the pair have stated were present in a Dallas hotel meeting in January 2021. Hoyt had ordered that Phillips and Engelbrecht turn over this information weeks ago.

During this meeting, True the Vote was allegedly given proof that Konnech had been storing the personal data of “millions” of poll workers in a China-based server.

According to Votebeat, “True the Vote then used that information to fuel months of vaguely defined accusations about the company and Yu in podcasts and appearances.”

Phillips and Engelbrecht had claimed that Yu was an agent of the Chinese Communist Party, and that the country had been using poll worker data to influence the 2020 election.

“On behalf of my clients we don’t want to release the name of this individual,” True the Vote attorney Brock Akers told Judge Hoyt in an Oct. 6 hearing.

True the Vote’s legal team released a name in a hearing earlier this month, Mike Hasson, stating that the analyst is in “danger from forces of the Chinese Communist party.”

Keep reading.

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

RELATED ARTICLES:

Elon Musk accuses Twitter board of ‘deliberately’ hiding evidence from court: ‘Stay tuned’

POWERFUL ENDORSEMENT: Zeldin Receives Backing Of Influential FJCC, Massive Orthodox Jewish Voting Bloc

WATCH Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin joins Zeldin in Westchester

Rep. Lee Zeldin Visits AND Gets Support From Bronx Bangladeshi Community Ahead of Gubernatorial Election

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Trending on Twitter: #PelosiGayLover, #PelosiGate, #PelosiSmollet, Biden’s Fake News & bringing back the ‘Vine’ app thumbnail

Trending on Twitter: #PelosiGayLover, #PelosiGate, #PelosiSmollet, Biden’s Fake News & bringing back the ‘Vine’ app

By Dr. Rich Swier

This is an update on what’s hot on Twitter. Enjoy! 


American Action News’ Staff in an article titled THIS Is Trending On Twitter About Nancy Pelosi’s Husband reported,

Throughout the morning, #PelosiGayLover, #PelosiGate, and #PelosiSmollet have been trending on Twitter due to speculation over the weekend over what was truly the cause of this strange hammer attack. David Depape, who is being identified as the man who attacked Paul Pelosi with a hammer last week was a nudist, and photos of his house show typical left-wing items including an LGBTQ flag, Black Lives Matter signs, etc., however, the media has since tried to spin this into an attack on right-wing/ Republican rhetoric. However, there’s no evidence to lead them in that direction. Not only was Paul Pelosi’s attacker not right-wing, but no notable figure has also said anything about going up to the Pelosi’s home and harming them. Speculation began to shift toward Paul Pelosi having an affair with the David DePape, and the attack was due to a dispute or an affair gone wrong.

Of course, this is only speculation, and nothing has been confirmed. Nonetheless, the hashtag has trended all morning on Twitter.

©American Action News.

Read more.

AAN Staff in an article titled Midterm Watch 2022: President Biden Tweets FAKE NEWS About “MAGA Republicans” wrote,

Democrats aren’t polling well this Midterm season and many potential voters are viewing the candidates the Democrats are trying to get elected as being lackluster. President Biden and John Fetterman, two men who are rarely seen publicly, met up to fundraise and get one last push to help Fetterman across the finish line. Former President Barack Obama also went to Georgia to rally for Stacey Abrams, whose election appears to be a sinking ship, and Raphael Warnock, who is in a closer-than-expected race for Senate against Herschel Walker.

Now that the Democrats have brought out both the current President and the former President, they’re left with very few tricks up their sleeves (other than attempting to capitalize off a very conveniently timed anonymous allegation against Herschel Walker, which almost no one is believing.) So, Democrats have opted to use the President’s Twitter account to spread, as they so frequently call it, “misinformation” about Republicans this midterm season.

I know which side I’m on.pic.twitter.com/RBiVHJqetY

— Joe Biden (@JoeBiden) October 31, 2022

The tweet lied about multiple things. While showing a picture of Senator Lindsey Graham, @JoeBiden claimed “(MAGA Republicans aim to) Ban Abortion Nationally,” which is an outright lie, especially when choosing to use the face of Sen. Graham, who introduced the Protecting Pain-Capable Unborn Children from Late-Term Abortions Act, as American Action News previously reported. This would be a 15-week abortion ban, putting the window of time to have an abortion multiple weeks longer than in several European countries.

©American Action News.

Read more.

In a NewsMax article titled Report: Twitter to Bring Back Vine Under Musk Theodore Bunker reports,

Twitter’s new owner, billionaire Elon Musk, has reportedly told engineers at the social media network to begin preparations to bring back Vine, the once-popular looping-video app.

Vine shut down in 2016, about four years after it was purchased by Twitter. The company then reportedly attempted to sell it but declined to do so despite receiving multiple offers, according to TechCrunch.

Sources told Axios that Musk has assigned engineers at Twitter to begin reviewing Vine’s code base, which one source said “needs a lot of work.”

© 2022 Newsmax.

Read more.

©Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

Today Mankind is in Dire Need of More Philosophers like Anicius Boëthius thumbnail

Today Mankind is in Dire Need of More Philosophers like Anicius Boëthius

By Dr. Rich Swier

“A man content to go to heaven alone will never go to heaven.” — Anicius Manlius Severinus Boëthius


I recently read The Consolation of Philosophy by Anicius Manlius Severinus Boëthius.

Anicius Manlius Severinus Boëthius or Anicius Boëthius lived from 480-524 AD.

Boëthius was a Roman scholar, Christian philosopher, statesman and the author of the celebrated De consolation philosophiae (The Consolation of Philosophy), a largely Neoplatonic work in which the pursuit of wisdom and the love of God are described as the true sources of human happiness.

What mankind is suffering from today is a lack of happiness because mankind has forgotten the words of Boëthius that proved what truly makes one happy is based upon the pursuit of wisdom and the love of God.

Boëthius wrote The Consolation of Philosophy while in prison wrongfully accused of treason and awaiting his execution which happened in 524 AD.

The Pursuit of Wisdom and the Love of God

Boëthius, while in prison, lamented his state of affairs. Boëthius was a high level Roman official whose words were embraced by many before a few accused him of treason against the Roman state.

Boëthius wrote,

“These it is who kill the rich crop of reason with the barren thorns of passion, who accustom men’s minds to disease, instead of setting them free.”

Boëthius was the victim of “the usual sickness of deluded minds.” Today, we are seeing deluded minds that have singled out free men and women for punishment for speaking “truth to power.” In America these free men and women are simply exercising their Constitutional rights to petition their elected officials. For this effort to tell the truth they have been labeled terrorists, semi-Fascists and traitors.

GradeSaver.com wrote this about The Consolation of Philosophy,

Evil has no substance, according to Philosophy, because it cannot participate in the ultimate pursuit of mankind: the supreme good. Therefore people who inflict their wickedness on the good are not truly powerful, since they have no capacity to stop the good people’s attainment of the one thing that matters. God orders the world through Providence, and the order of things that happen on earth is called Fate. Though people on earth cannot understand the ways of Providence, they must nevertheless accept whatever Fate sends, for all fortune, good or bad, is good. Bad fortune can instruct the recipient in the ways of virtue, and, often is better for the soul.

God does not interfere with free will, Philosophy concludes. Though God knows all things past and present, this knowledge doesn’t preclude the freedom of choice of human beings. God’s knowledge is not like our knowledge, and doesn’t happen over a period of time. God had one act of knowing the world, and in that act knew all things, including all the free choices of all the people throughout the entire history of the world.

Finally, Boethius, through this long conversation with Philosophy, has been comforted. Philosophy leaves him with the advice to cultivate virtue, for the Heavenly Judge sees all things. [Emphasis added]

The Story of an American Patriot and Political Prisoner

Fast forward to 2022 AD and we see many American patriots in prisoned who have been wrongfully accused of participating in an “insurrection” and accused of treason just because they attended a rally on January 6th, 2022 in Washington, D.C.

These falsely accused political prisoners, like Boëthius, are still awaiting judgment.

Among these political prisoners, much like Boëthius, is a young man named Zachary “Zach” Rehl who on March 17th, 2021, the Federal Bureau of Investigation agents arrested him at his home in Port Richmond, Pennsylvania.  From October 2008 to May 2012, Zack was a U.S. Marine Corps non-commissioned officer in Yuma, Arizona. Zack is a 100% disabled Marine Corps. veteran with a wife and young child.

Why Zack?

Because Zack takes his oath to protect and defend the U.S. Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic seriously. Zack understands that the oath that he, and all those who honorably served our nation, does not expire until we do.

What are Zack’s crimes?

  1. Zack is the leader of the Philadelphia chapter of the Proud Boys. He was one of the organizers of the We the People rally outside the Independence Hall in Philadelphia in 2018, which supported Donald Trump.
  2. In July 2020, he attended the Back the Blue rally outside the Fraternal Order of Police lodge in Philadelphia where the Proud Boys members mingled with police officers. (c)
  3. “Just FYI, WE’RE HERE with you in DC now! Love you all!” he wrote on Parler on the evening of January 5, 2021. He had raised more than $5,500 via the Christian website GiveSendGo to fund his travel from Philadelphia to Washington, D.C., USA. 
  4. Wearing a camouflage cap while carrying a Temple University backpack, he went to the U.S. Capitol building in Washington, D.C. on January 6, 2021. That day, Trump’s supporters held a peaceful Save America rally while the joint session of Congress was certifying the vote of the Electoral College and affirming Joe Biden‘s victory in the 2020 presidential election. During the Save America rally, he assisted Proud Boys leaders Ethan Nordean and Joseph Biggs but never entered the U.S. Capitol building.

You see Zack is an American patriot, a disabled veteran and a member of the Proud Boys. These are now punishable offenses according to this administration.

Like Anicius, Zack is a political prisoner who has yet to be judged by a jury of his peers.

Zach, in a letter to his wife, warned:

“They are jailing innocent people on bogus and trumped-up charges because those people simply supported the sitting president Donald Trump at the time; which is absolutely insane. If you think it can’t happen to you, look at me, because if it can happen to me, trust me, it can happen to you.”

Zack like Anicius faces an uncertain future. But he wears the full armor of God.

But Zack and his fellow imprisoned patriots  are consoled by the truth that people who inflict their wickedness on the good are not truly powerful, since they have no capacity to stop the good people’s attainment of the one thing that matters.

May God bless Zack, his family and his fellow political prisoners.

©Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

The Fall of the House of Twitter thumbnail

The Fall of the House of Twitter

By The Daily Skirmish – Liberato.US

Twitter employees are calling it ‘Black Monday’.  Elon Musk is expected to fire many of them today, having already shown four top executives the door.  Estimates vary, but 10 to 50 percent of Twitter’s employees will lose their jobs today.  Don’t expect me to feel sorry for them.  Twitter censored me, then Facebook censored me.  Pride goeth before the fall.  I don’t feel the least bit sorry for these minor minions of the authoritarian Left who think they know the first thing about governance and try to silence anyone who disagrees with heir stupid little opinions.  It makes me smile to see them thrown out on their ear.

I’m not sorry in the least, not when I see the scope of the Left’s attempt to shut people like me up.  The Missouri Attorney General and others brought a lawsuit against Big Tech and the Biden administration for what the lawsuit calls a “massive, sprawling federal ‘Censorship Enterprise’.”  The case is ongoing.  Anthony Fauci, Jen Psaki, and other officials from the Biden administration now face depositions where they will have to explain how and why they colluded with Twitter and other social media platforms to shut people up about Hunter Biden’s laptop, the 2020 presidential election, COVID, and other topics.

As vast as that effort was, it only scratches the surface of what the authoritarian Left and their Democrat friends are doing to suppress speech in this country.

Democrat-controlled California just passed a law prohibiting doctors from disagreeing with the government about COVID treatments.  Which is really funny because I’ve given you story after story in previous commentaries, about public health authorities being completely wrong about COVID – so many stories, I’ve lost count.

The Republican National Committee just sued Google for suppressing 22 million get-out-the-vote and fundraising emails.  Google sent the mailings to users’ spam folders.  Right before the election.  Tell me that’s an accident.

A coffee shop in Virginia was forced to close after the owner celebrated the overturning of Roe v. Wade online.  Left-wing nasties bombarded the shop with negative reviews.

The comic strip ‘Dilbert’ was recently canceled in 80 newspapers without explanation.  The creator believes it is because the strip has been poking fun at corporations that are pursuing Woke agendas.

Canceling ‘Dilbert’ shows you just how weak the authoritarian Left really is.  It is so weak it can’t even stand a little ribbing from a comic strip.   That reminds me of Xi Jinping kicking Winnie the Pooh out of China because he didn’t like people saying he looks like Winnie the Pooh.

The Left is afraid of comic strips.  The Left is afraid of nobodies like me telling the truth – so afraid, we get kicked off of Facebook and Twitter.  The Left is afraid of coffee shop owners who think for themselves, doctors who exercise their independent professional judgment, parents speaking their minds at school board meetings, and FBI agents blowing the whistle on agency wrong-doing.  Trying to shut us all up – that’s weakness, not strength.  So to all you Jack Dorsey-booted left-wing authoritarian thugs out there, don’t think for a minute you have succeeded in getting rid of us.  You are too weak to succeed.  And we’re just getting started.

©Christopher Wright. All rights reserved.

RELATED TWEET:

The former CEO of Twitter, Parag Agrawal, thought he was going to get 42 million just for being fired. Instead, Elon Musk found a way around that part of the contract and he will get a grand total of $0 😂

— Matt Wallace (@MattWallace888) October 31, 2022

Visit The Daily Skirmish and Watch Eagle Headline News – 7:30am ET Weekdays

We welcome Daryn Ross of the ‘Patriots with Grit’ podcast.  More about Daryn soon.

Divorce—Satan’s Destructive Weapon thumbnail

Divorce—Satan’s Destructive Weapon

By Bud Hancock

This article will attempt to address one of the most serious problems in the Church, the Body of Christ, today. That problem is theft through fraud. I’m not talking about crooked preachers, or embezzlement from a church body by an employee; even though those can be serious problems, they are only isolated incidents that occur. The subject of this article is a much more widespread problem that affects the Body of Christ worldwide, but especially in the United States. The problem is divorce in general and among Christians in particular.

I can’t speak for anyone else, but I never liked having anything stolen from me. Being quite poor growing up, it was difficult enough to have, and keep, anything of value without the threat of loss to a thief. So, my parents always taught me to safeguard the things that I owned, specifically such things as my bike, my ball glove and baseball (yes, as a boy, I loved playing baseball).  I usually followed their advice and made sure those items were kept where they belonged. However, there were times when I would forget to do so, and yes, there were times when thieves took what belonged to me, due to my negligence. The result was disheartening since money was not easy to come by, hence the replacement of the stolen items was not a guarantee.

The Thief and the Fraud

We, as Christians, would do well to remember that, as good as our Father in heaven is to us, providing all that we need to be secure, healthy and prosperous, there is another spiritual being in the world who delights in trying to undo everything that God has done.

Jesus described Satan as “the thief”, the one whose sole purpose is ‘to steal, and to kill and to destroy”- (John 10:10 KJV). Satan, the thief, the killer, the destroyer, is always roaming around, looking for a victim of his deception, someone who can be turned from God’s word and redirected on a different path. This is exactly why the Holy Spirit instructed the apostle Peter to pen the words,

“Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour” (I Peter 5:8 KJV).

The word translated ‘sober’ in this passage is from the Greek word, ‘nepho (pronounced nay-fo) and it has duel meanings, 1) to abstain from wine, and 2) to be watchful.

Merriam-Webster defines a ‘fraud’ as: 1) a person who is not what he or she pretends to be: an imposter, 2) one that is not what it seems or is represented to be.

Notice in I Peter 5:8 that the devil is NOT a roaring lion, he only passes himself off as one to deceive and get his victims to willingly, and through fear, enter the trap he sets for his prey. Satan is a fraud and uses fraudulent methods to deceive and trap his victims. We are also told that he seeks anyone whom he may devour.  The word ‘may’ hints that the victim has something to say about the devouring process. Unless the victim cooperates with Satan, accepting the deception and lies offered, Satan can easily be repelled. James, the half-brother of Jesus tells us,

“Submit yourselves therefore to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you” (see James 4:7 KJV).

The key to the repelling of Satan lies in being submitted to God. A huge part of being ‘sober and vigilant’ (Peter’s words) is to ‘submit oneself to God’ (James’s words). According to these scriptures, if one lives in a sober, vigilant manner, submitted to God, the devil must absolutely flee from that person.

History’s Greatest Heist

There have been many Hollywood movies created about great robberies, or heists, that have been committed throughout history. Some of these robberies involve huge sums of gold or other precious metals, large sums of money, priceless works of art, and large amounts of diamonds or other precious stones. As valuable as these might be, from the human perspective, none of them ranks near the top of the list of greatest heists. That dis-honor belongs to the stealing of the union of a man and a woman, joined together before Almighty God by the making of solemn vows, intended to be holy and unbreakable before God.

What Does God Say About Marriage?

God decreed the beauty and holiness of marriage when he crafted a perfect mate, taken from Adam’s own body, to join with Adam shortly after he was created. God intended for Adam and Eve to join (marry), be fruitful, multiply and replenish the earth. Adam said this to God after God had removed a part of Adam’s own body and used it to skillfully create Eve, his perfect helpmate:

And Adam said, this is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man” (Genesis 2:23 KJV).

Jesus, when questioned by the Pharisees regarding the lawfulness of divorce, answered them this way:

“The Pharisees also came unto him, tempting him, and saying unto him, Is it lawful for a man to put away his wife for every cause? And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that He which made them at the beginning made them male and female, And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh? Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder” (Matthew 19:3-6 KJV).

When God says that a marriage should not be dissolved by any man (or woman), I believe He means just that.  For reference, I have provided a link to a previous Chugley’s Chatter article on marriage.

How Important are Vows?

All my life, any wedding ceremony I’ve attended, including my own, had as an integral part, the wedding ‘vows’. I seldom thought about it but now must wonder, what exactly are ‘vows’ and how important are they? Merriam-Webster defines the word vow as: (noun) a solemn promise or assertion; specifically: one by which a person is bound to an act, service, or condition. 

Why Do People Make Vows? 

Based on the scripture where Jesus stated that, “what God has joined together, no man is to put asunder”, the making of vows, or solemn promises, as part of a wedding/marriage ceremony, is to ensure the participants understand how important the union of a man and a woman is in God’s eyes.

There are other occasions where vows are considered extremely important, such as entering the military, or assuming public office. In each case, the promise of ‘fidelity’ is a critical element for the participants to be successful. When any person who has publicly vowed fidelity to a government, a public office or another person, as in marriage, breaks the vow, nothing good follows

Knowing then the importance of vows, why is divorce so prevalent, especially in The Church?  There may be as many answers to that question as there are marriages, but a few are more likely to provide the best insight into this problem. Based on the explicit commandments from God’s Word about marriage, any marriage performed by a minister of the gospel before Almighty God is as much a vow to God as to the persons in the marriage, but that may not be understood, or taken seriously enough, by the participants. The vows made in the marriage ceremony are binding on both parties, and, in God’s eyes, should never be broken (Matthew 19:6 KJV). Marriage vows are made “in faith”, e.g. faith in the other party’s lifetime commitment to the union (till death do us part) and faith in God to provide everything needed to make the marriage successful. If God decreed that a husband and wife should not be ‘put asunder’ (separated), He would surely do all He can to help the husband and wife be successful in the marriage. It must be assumed then that, when a Christian couple decides to divorce, the Word of God was not truly believed by one, or the other, or possibly both.

The Right Kind of Love

Adam and Eve gave little priority to God’s Word when they were commanded to abstain from eating the forbidden fruit, and instead, disobeyed Him and sinned. Many Christian couples also place little priority on God’s commands regarding marriage. Based on God’s Word, and the making of marital ‘vows’ before God, if both participants are believers, why would they consider divorce a solution to marital problems? Did they marry simply because they ‘fell in love’?  And, what does it mean to ‘fall in love’? Is it biblical?  Love, at least the lasting ‘God-kind’ of love, is not something to ‘fall into’, but this is a question for a future article.

In the Bible, several words are translated ‘love’. There is the Greek word ‘phileo’ (Strong’s 5368, pronounced fil-eh’-o), which means ‘a fondness for’, or an ‘affection for’. This is considered by many to be ‘brotherly love’.

Then there is the Hebrew word ahab (Strong’s 157, pronounced aw-hab’), and it means to have affection for, sexually or otherwise. This could also be considered the Eros love, or the physical sexual attraction that brings a man and a woman together bodily.

Finally, there is the Greek word agapao (Strong’s 25, pronounced ag-ap-ah’-o). This is generally considered the ‘God kind of love’, or the love that God has for all mankind: “For God so loved the world (agapao) that He gave His only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth on Him should not perish, but have everlasting life” (John 3:16). This is the ‘love that gives unconditionally’. God’s love was, and is, based on a decision, not a physical attraction, and is expressed thus: “I choose to love you because you are valuable and precious to me, and not because you are lovable.” God loved us when we were in a sinful, filthy state and had nothing to recommend us for His love. It was strictly His decision, based on His agapao love, that provided the means for our redemption.

Therefore the kind of love that every should be built upon is not the kind that two people fall into, but rather a kind based on a decision to love, until death parts them.

Love in Marriage

All three types of biblical love must be found in a Godly marriage if it is to be successful.  The husband and wife must have a true affection for one another, such as that between best friends (phileo). They should also share the love that unites them sexually and makes them truly ‘one flesh’ (ahab/Eros). Most importantly, they must have, and understand, the God-kind of love, the love that gives unconditionally. Ahab and phileo love are based on a mutual attraction to, or fondness for, another that can be, and usually is, subject to outside forces that can cause the love to change, to decrease or even disappear altogether. Being more sensual based, these two types of love can be highly influenced by physical appearance, especially aging and/or sickness which eventually takes its toll on our human bodies.

Even so, these factors do not make them any less important in a marriage, but they should not be, indeed cannot be, the foundation for a solid marriage. The foundation must be based on the God-kind of love, the agapao love that God displayed when we were totally unlovable in our fallen, sinful state. In other words, the love that is based on ‘a decision’ and is therefore not subject to outside influences.

In a marriage, this God-kind of love could never be merely the product of a human thought process alone, any more than it could be solely the result of a bodily, physical, sexual attraction. It is based on making a decision which says, “I choose to love you because you are valuable and precious to me; and, just as God loves me, I will continue to love you even when you are the least lovable”. Only when the phileo and ahab love are added to the foundation of agapao love will marital success be possible.

Satan’s Weapon Against Marriage

Satan has hated marriage since God introduced the concept when he created Eve for Adam and instructed them to ‘become one flesh’. By doing so, God placed the responsibility for replenishment of the earth squarely on their shoulders. His perfect plan was to provide the means necessary for the two of them to present God with the family He desired to fellowship with. Satan began tearing married couples apart in the Garden of Eden by tempting them to defy God and receive the promised curse. Unfortunately, he has been very successful in his evil attempt for centuries. Even more unfortunately, men and women have made it easy for him in many cases.

Anytime Satan can cause a man or woman to leave his or her mate, he has succeeded in stealing from those two people the most precious gift, other than salvation, they can receive.  For all married couples, marriage is, or should be, a treasure to be protected and cherished, but especially for Christian couples. The devil is successful when he can cause divorce among any married couples, but, I’m sure he gets much more excited when he can convince a Christian couple that divorce is the answer to their problems. In a Christian marriage, how does Satan use his weapon? Other than deception and lies, he is limited in his power to affect our lives. He must therefore get the husband and wife to cooperate with him since he cannot physically force them to separate. What are the means he uses for this deception?

One tactic he uses is to convince the man or his wife that there is someone better-looking, smarter or perhaps wealthier than the present mate. He may try to convince them that the marriage vow is not really that important, that, after all, marriage is nothing more than ‘a piece of paper’. He does not want either one to know that God considers marriage a “taking of vows”, a swearing if you will, to follow a specific moral path, in fidelity to one’s chosen mate, regardless of the problems encountered, or the potential outcome being other than that originally anticipated. Dissolving the marriage means that the vows meant little to nothing when taken, indicating a lack of character in one or both parties.

Satan works toward getting married couples, especially husbands, to lose their ‘self-love’.  God decreed that a man and woman, when married, should become ‘one flesh’, and God sees a husband and wife exactly that way, as ‘one flesh’. Paul wrote that, “So ought men to love their wives as their own bodies. He that loveth his wife loveth himself. For no man ever yet hated his own flesh; but nourisheth and cherisheth it, even as the Lord the church: For we are members of his body, of his flesh, and of his bones(Ephesians 5:28-30 KJV). Any man who fails to follow this scripture has placed himself in contradiction against his own body, and that cannot produce a good outcome. A person who does not love himself/herself will not know how to properly love another.

Assisting Satan

God has a purpose for every man and woman born into the human family. The Word of God is the guideline that must be followed for any person to learn what that purpose is. When a husband and wife decide to terminate a marriage, it means that one or the other, or possibly both, have either not learned their purpose for existence, or do not want to admit what that purpose is. The Bible, God’s Word, must be the marriage guide, as led by the Holy Spirit, in order for marriages to be successful. The Holy Spirit, guiding one into all truth (John 16:13 KJV) becomes the leader, directing the husband and wife on a certain path toward their purpose in life. Fulfillment, rather than gratification, is to be the main goal in marriage.  Without leadership, people seek gratification rather than fulfillment. The latter requires commitment and character.  The former does not”. (Quote from Marilyn Barnewall / NewsWithViews / Feb 25,2018)

Too often, married couples allow outside influences to alter the commitment they made when taking the marriage vows. When the commitment is gone the marriage is doomed. It takes a mighty effort on the part of both a husband and a wife to make any marriage work. Success is certainly not automatic. Once the glitter and the celebration and the giddiness of the wedding ceremony are gone, the real work begins. Only those couples who are truly tuned in to God’s Word have the slightest hope of having a good and lasting marriage, let alone a great one. The mates who remain in touch with God’s Word, which is His will, can experience a lasting fellowship with God as well as the joy of a wonderful, lasting God-ordained marriage.  Building a good, successful marriage is a sign of reverence for God.

Conclusion

In God’s Word, we are given great counsel, which when followed, will help any married couple build a marriage that works and lasts ‘unto death’. For example, the Apostle Paul writes in his letter to the Ephesian believers:

Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body. Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in everything. Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it; That he might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word,  That he might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be holy and without blemish. So ought men to love their wives as their own bodies. He that loveth his wife loveth himself. For no man ever yet hated his own flesh; but nourisheth and cherisheth it, even as the Lord the church: For we are members of his body, of his flesh, and of his bones. For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall be joined unto his wife, and they two shall be one flesh. This is a great mystery: but I speak concerning Christ and the church.  Nevertheless let every one of you in particular so love his wife even as himself; and the wife see that she reverence her husband.” (Ephesians 5:22-33 KJV).

If every Christian husband would realize that the word ‘love’, used by Paul in all the verses above is the agapao, the God-kind of love, and realize that he is to love his wife in the same unconditional way that God loves us, his marriage would become much stronger. Also of critical importance is for Christian wives to know that the word reverence in verse 33, is the Greek word phoebe, (Strong’s 5399, pronounced fob-eh’-o) and it means “to be in awe of”.  If a wife wants agapao love, respect and adoration from her husband, she should treat him with the same reverence, and awe, that we are all to show toward our heavenly Father.

The psalmist said it best:

“Lord, who shall abide in thy tabernacle? Who shall dwell in thy holy hill?  He that walketh uprightly, and worketh righteousness, and speaketh the truth in his heart. He that backbiteth not with his tongue, nor doeth evil to his neighbour, nor taketh up a reproach against his neighbour. In whose eyes a vile person is contemned; but he honoureth them that fear the Lord. He that sweareth to his own hurt, and changeth not” (Psalm 15:1-4 KJV).

My desire is that these words have provided some insight into true Christian marriage with the goal that divorce should not be considered an option, or at least the very LAST option, when marital problems show up, and show up, they will.

Blessings!

budaroo@twc.com

©Bud Hancock. All rights reserved.

Who is David DePape & What Really Happened in Paul Pelosi’s House? thumbnail

Who is David DePape & What Really Happened in Paul Pelosi’s House?

By Dr. Rich Swier

The legacy media and Biden are all in trying to pin the attack on Paul Pelosi by David DePape on Trump supporters. Biden compared the attack on Paul Pelosi to the J6 Save America Rally in Washington, D.C.

Now that’s the kind of propaganda being pushed far and wide by Democrats and their legacy media outlets.

QUESTION: Does this narrative make any sense at all?

It is early in this case but there are some things that we do know from the San Francisco Police Department.

Let’s look at the facts and some other theories on what happened on Friday night at 2:30 a.m. PST in the Pelosi house.

Who is David Depape

While doing research on David DePape we came across this comment on a forum,

Makes hemp jewelry, lives in Berkeley, nude protestor….yea that every right wing extremist megamagarepublican hobbies

The details of this attack are unusual. According to MSNBC’s Andrew Blankstein, Tom Winter, Antonio Planas and Tim Stelloh,

Police Chief William Scott said during a Friday news conference that officers arrived at the Pelosi home for a well-being check shortly before 2:30 a.m. PT. Police then witnessed an attack on Paul Pelosi.

What is a well-being check?

According to San Francisco’s ABC7 News,

One of the highest number of calls San Francisco police officers respond to are “well-being checks,” according to the city’s data close to 18,000 calls in 2019.

MSNBC’s Blankstein, Winter, Planas and Stelloh then reported,

Both DePape and Paul Pelosi held a hammer moments before a violent confrontation, Scott said.

“The suspect pulled the hammer away from Mr. Pelosi and violently assaulted him with it,” he said. “Our officers immediately tackled the suspect, disarmed him, took him into custody, requested emergency backup and rendered medical aid.”

So, Paul Pelosi had the hammer first and then David DePape took the hammer from Pelosi and began beating him with it.

QUESTION: Why?

Here’s one theory as to the why,

David Depape tells investigators that he and Paul Pelosi were engaging in gay sex and an argument ensued over drugs. Pelosi’s are refusing to turn over surveillance video of their home fueling more speculation of homosexuality at the home. Depape has arrests for male prostitution

— JU5T_F4CT5 (@JU5T_F4CT5) October 29, 2022

While we cannot confirm that Paul and David were doing the nasty, what we can say is that there was a confrontation and both men had during the confrontation held the hammer that inflicted physical damage to Pelosi, according to the San Francisco Police Chief and eyewitness report of the officers who were called to the Pelosi house for a well-being check.

There are more questions to ask given Paul Pelosi’s recent run in with the California Highway Patrol (CHP) on a Napa roadway for driving while intoxicated. Watch this CBS Sacrament video report with CHP dash camera of Paul Pelosi.

According to the New York Post’s ,

The man accused of attacking Paul Pelosi with a hammer had been living in a school bus weeks before the attack, neighbors said.

Those who know David DePape, 42, told The Post they’ve seen him living in a yellow school bus parked in front of the Berkeley home of his ex, San Francisco pro-nudist activist Gypsy Taub, with whom he shares three children.

“He usually kept to himself,” neighbor Ryan La Coste told The Post. “He would just give us a blank stare when we would walk by. We tried to stay clear of him. … No one knew he was here because he would be on the bus or he just didn’t communicate.”

[ … ]

DePape’s neighbors, Margarita and Julio Gonzalez, said he used to live in the Victorian home with Taub and the children but at some point, began staying off-and-on in the two dilapidated school buses on the property.

“He is homeless … but I never seen him being violent,” Margarita Gonzalez told The Post. “He never had work. In the beginning when he lived with (Taub), he just stayed inside the home and she was the one who did the shopping and everything.”

When she heard about Pelosi’s attack, Margarita said she also was shocked her neighbor had been accused.

“I was surprised because I never saw him aggressive,” Margarita Gonzalez said. “I don’t think [the attack on Pelosi] was something personal. … Maybe there’s a mental problem with him.”

Reporter Michael Shellenberger wrote on his website,

But DePape’s politics have little rhyme or reason. In past years DePape shared a post about Stephen Colbert’s 2006 roast of President George W. Bush at the White House Correspondents dinner; linked to videos of Disney films altered to make it look like the characters were swearing; and claimed, “Jesus is the anti-Christ” — not exactly a litany of right-wing tropes.

And, as I discovered yesterday, DePape lived with a notorious local nudist in a Berkeley home, complete with a Black Lives Matter sign in the window and an LGBT rainbow flag, emblazoned with a marijuana symbol, hanging from a tree. A closer look reveals the characteristics of a homeless encampment, or what Europeans call “an open drug scene.” In the driveway, there is a broken-down camper van. On the street is a yellow school bus, which neighbors said DePape occasionally stayed in. Both are filled with garbage typical of such structures in homeless encampments. People come and go from the house and the vehicles, neighbors say, in part to partake in the use of a potent psychedelic drug, ibogaine. [Emphasis added]

Read more

What is known to date:

  1. Paul Pelosi drinks to excess and was recently arrested by the California Highway Patrol when his car ran off the road. See video above.
  2. The San Francisco Chronicle identified DePape frolicking nude outside city hall with dozens of others at the 2013 wedding of pro-nudity activist Gypsy Taub, who was marrying another man.
  3. A 2013 article in The Chronicle described David DePape as a “hemp jewelry maker” who lived in a Victorian flat in Berkeley with Taub.
  4. David Depape sells necklaces made of hemp.
  5. David Depape lived in a yellow school bus.
  6. DePape was in the Pelosi home, which is interesting given that she is such a high ranking political figure you would think they had an alarm system.
  7. We don’t have the who, what, where, when and why the DePape/Pelosi confrontation began.
  8. It appears that first Paul Pelosi had hold of the hammer and then DePape took the hammer away from Pelosi and began beating him with it according to the police.
  9. According to the The Western Journal, “When police were sent to the home of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her husband Paul around 2:30 a.m. Friday, they were told there was a man there waiting for Nancy, but he was described on the call as a ‘friend’.”

Police dispatch to Paul Pelosi home:

“RP (reporting person) stated there’s a male in the home and that he’s going to wait for his wife. RP stated that he doesn’t know who the male is but he advised that his name is David and that he is a friend.”

pic.twitter.com/O0HeS0s0I5

— Greg Price (@greg_price11) October 28, 2022

Given the instantaneous response from the media that DePape was a “conspiracy theorist”, posted about QAnon and “racist” remarks and was according to the SF Police “someone with sprawling and contradictory views.”

Clearly it’s to early to tell what really happened on Friday.

David DePape does not fit the profile of a Trump supporter. DePape does fit the profile of a drug user who is down on his luck with a broken relationship who’s living in a broken down yellow bus in San Francisco, California. Beyond that we cannot, for the life of us, understand why the Pelosi house.

As they say time will tell and eventually the truth will reveal itself.

©Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLE: Pelosi Attack Suspect Was A Psychotic Homeless Addict Estranged From His Pedophile Lover & Their Children

RELATED TWEET:

https://t.co/RxRCBe5zzM

— Dr. Rich Swier (@drrichswier) October 29, 2022

Our Battered Bill of Rights thumbnail

Our Battered Bill of Rights

By Wallace Bruschweiler

The French Revolution of 1789 and the Russian Revolution of 1917 aimed to free the masses of oppressive regimes (think Deep State). But the American Revolution of 1776 was very different. Had the Colonists been afforded the same freedoms and fair treatment enjoyed by their English cousins, 1776 might be just another date on the calendar.

The trouble began when King George III and Parliament attempted to balance their budget by taxing the unrepresented Colonists. The Stamp Act taxed every document — public or private — even playing cards and newspapers. American lawyers and newspapers threw such a fit, the Stamp Act lasted only one year. Next, came the Townsend Acts taxing glass, lead, paint, tea, and, once again, paper. Taxing paper got the lawyers and the newspapers literally up in arms. Apparently, about paper, the Brits were slow learners. Tea was another no-no. You know the rest of that story.

Once rid of the Red Coats (until the War of 1812), Americans got serious about being a real nation. By March 9, 1789, the United States was under its new constitution. Still angered by the brutish treatment they suffered under the Red Coats, on December 15, 1791, they tacked on a Bill of Rights: Ten constitutional amendments designed to make sure such outrages would never happen again. Good luck with that.

Let’s look at the Bill of Rights after the eight years of Obama and two years of Biden:

First Amendment: Freedom of speech and religion are on life support. Allied together to protect the Deep State, the MSM and Social Media have run roughshod over freedom of speech and religion, (trying to force Nuns to buy condoms). Censorship of conservative speech and assembly on college campuses is routine. Selected individuals are banned from Social Media.

Second Amendment: Every act of gun violence is met with attempts to take guns away from the people who don’t shoot other people.

Third Amendment: While we aren’t forced to quarter soldiers in our homes, open borders means our nation is being forced to quarter illegal aliens in enclaves selected to alter the outcome of future elections.

Fourth Amendment: Searches and seizures, often unreasonable, are an FBI specialty. Even the home of a former U.S. President was ransacked. Personal items were taken.

Combining Amendments 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9: Many January 6th detainees were denied the process of law, held incommunicado, denied the rights of accused persons, denied the right to a speedy public trial, denied bail outright or even reasonable bail, and imprisoned under cruel and inhuman conditions.

Tenth Amendment: The rights reserved to the States are often ignored, sometimes by the U.S. Supreme Court.

The U.S. Constitution decrees the conduct of elections to be the province of the States. Some States do it fair and square. Other States allow political partisans to stuff ballot boxes, and shower residents, legal and illegal, with ballots to harvest and cast. Still, by and large, our elections have a way of shaping up and restoring our representative republic to be the envy of the world. Very soon, that assertion will be put to the test.

Suggested reading: Paper: Paging Through History by Mark Kurlansky, 2016. Alexander Hamilton by Ron Chernow, 2004.

©2022. William Hamilton. All rights reserved.