EXCLUSIVE: Trump Admin Launching New Vetting Unit In Wake Of National Guard Attack

By The Daily Caller

The Trump administration will be dramatically enhancing its screening of all foreign nationals with the launch of a new vetting center.

In response to a slate of high-profile arrests of Afghan men accused of committing or planning serious attacks on American soil, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is establishing a specialized unit intending to markedly upgrade the country’s vetting procedures of migrants, according to a memo exclusively obtained by the Daily Caller News Foundation. The new vetting center will help federal officials identify terrorists, criminal aliens or other foreigners who pose a danger to the country.

“USCIS’ role in the nation’s immigration system has never been more critical,” Joe Edlow, the director of the agency, said in a public statement.

“In the wake of several recent incidents of violence, including a foreign national attacking National Guard service members on U.S. soil, establishing this vetting center will give us more enhanced capabilities to safeguard national security and ensure public safety,” Edlow continued.

The new vetting center, when fully operational, will “draw on the full spectrum” of screening capabilities and leverage state-of-the-art technology when reviewing immigration applications and petitions, according to the memo. Headquartered in Atlanta, the center will also be tasked with reviewing already-approved applications for foreign nationals and prioritizing applications from designated countries of concern.

Trump officials say the enhanced screening is necessary after four years of the Biden administration, which oversaw a historic border crisis and a chaotic military withdrawal from Afghanistan that sparked the importation of thousands of Afghan nationals.

“Under the Biden administration, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services was pushed to expedite the immigration and naturalization processes with little regard for how that affected national security and the safety of our communities,” Edlow stated. “We changed that approach on day one of the Trump administration.”

“Under President Trump, we are building more protective measures that ensure fraud, deception, and threats do not breach the integrity of our immigration system,” the USCIS director continued.

The Trump White House, which has long prioritized border security, has doubled down on security efforts since Rahmanullah Lakanwal, an Afghan national brought into the country in 2021 under humanitarian parole, allegedly killed one National Guard member and left another in critical condition in an ambush-style attack in Washington, D.C., hours before Thanksgiving Day.

Immediately after the attack, federal immigration officials dramatically restricted asylum applications for all foreign nationals and completely halted immigration processes for individuals hailing from 19 countries deemed to be “high-risk.” On Wednesday, USCIS announced it was scaling back the timeframe in which asylum seekers and other foreign nationals can have valid work permits in the U.S.

Including Lakanwal, three different Afghan nationals let into the country through the Biden-era Operation Allies Welcome program have been arrested within a week. The FBI arrested Mohammad Dawood Alokozay on Nov. 25 for allegedly making bomb threats in Fort Worth, Texas and Jaan Shah Safi was arrested by immigration officials on Wednesday for allegedly providing support to ISIS-K.

AUTHOR

Jason Hopkins

Immigration Reporter

RELATED ARTICLES:

Betrayed American Workers Expose Dark Underbelly Of H-1B Visa Scheme

Cartelville, USA: Documenting the Border Crisis

RELATED VIDEO: Arrest of Somali Immigrant fraudster

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

PODCAST: Federal agencies blame Democrats for the government shutdown. Are they violating the Hatch Act?

By Conservative Commandos Radio Show and AUN-TV

A banner on the Department of Housing and Urban Development website currently reads, “The Radical Left in Congress shut down the government. HUD will use…In a striking departure from long-standing norms, several federal agencies are publicly blaming congressional Democrats for the government shutdown.”

A banner on the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s website currently reads, “The Radical Left in Congress shut down the government. HUD will use available resources to help Americans in need.”

Kedric Payne leads the ethics program at the Campaign Legal Center, a nonprofit and nonpartisan organization that advances democracy through law.

“It is extremely unusual and possibly unprecedented because there is no reason for an agency to get involved in such partisan statements to the public,” Payne said. “I worked previously in the federal government. We always had particular language that was ready for a shutdown, and never did it have any partisan nature to that.”

A message at the top of the Department of Justice website reads, “Democrats have shut down the government.”

Department of Health and Human Services employees received an email prior to the shutdown stating, “Unfortunately, Democrats are blocking this continuing resolution in the U.S. Senate due to unrelated policy demands.”

Payne said there needs to be an investigation to determine whether this is a violation of the Hatch Act, a federal law that prohibits government employees from engaging in political campaign activity.

“The larger problem is that it violates an ethics norm where agencies may perform the work of an administration, but they do it in a nonpartisan manner,” Payne said. “These statements are not from an individual. They’re from the agency, from the American government, and they are made in a way that divides the public based on partisan affiliation. And that is not a normal activity for a government agency.”

©2025 . All rights reserved.

Senate To Confirm 97 More Trump Nominees After Democrat Blockade Fails

By The Daily Caller

Republicans will confirm a bloc of eight dozen Trump nominees as soon as next week following an attempted blockade by Senate Democrats.

Republican leadership planned Thursday to kick-off the procedural process to confirm 88 of President Donald Trump’s nominees in a bloc vote, but were initially thwarted by Democratic Colorado Sen. Michael Bennet, who challenged the package for violating Senate rules. When Republicans refiled the package later on Thursday, the conference included an additional nine nominees, bringing the total to nearly 100.

Democrats blocked the group package because Sara Bailey — one of President Donald Trump’s nominees included in the package — was not eligible to be included.

When Republicans went nuclear in September to streamline the confirmation process over Democrats’ fierce objections, the conference did not allow cabinet-level positions or judicial appointments to be confirmed in a group package.

Bailey, a former Fox News contributor, has been tapped to serve as director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy, which is a senior-level position on par with a cabinet secretary.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune argued that Democrats’ delay tactics amounted to “Trump Derangement Syndrome” during remarks on the Senate floor Thursday.

“Democrats – and their base – still can’t deal with the fact that President Trump won last November,” Thune said on the Senate floor. “And so they have held up every single one – every single one – of his nominations in revenge.”

The new package includes former Republican New York Rep. Anthony D’Esposito, who has been appointed to serve as inspector general of the Department of Labor. Thirteen U.S. attorney nominees and dozens of lower-level executive branch nominees are also teed up for confirmation.

The Senate has confirmed 314 civilian nominees as of Thursday evening, according to a tally by the Senate Republican Communications Center.

The 97-member bloc would bring the Senate to more than 410 civilian confirmations in the first year of Trump’s second term.

“That far outstrips total confirmations by this point in President Biden’s term, and in President Trump’s first term as well,” Thune said Thursday.

Thune also said that Senate Republicans have virtually cleared the nominations backlog. Before Republicans changed Senate precedent to allow for certain nominees to be confirmed in groups, more than 150 of the president’s picks were awaiting floor consideration.

The Senate approved a 48-member nominations package in September and an additional 108 of the president’s picks in a single group vote in October.

Bennet celebrated his short-lived blockade of Trump’s nominees Thursday before Republicans added more individuals to the resolution.

“I will not allow unqualified nominees, this White House, or the President to undermine the rule of law and our national security,” the Colorado Democrat wrote in a statement posted to social media.

AUTHOR

Adam Pack

Reporter

RELATED ARTICLES:

Democrats Torpedo Bipartisan Talks With Take-It-Or-Leave-It Obamacare Plan

Gun Orgs Facing Trump DOJ ‘Opposition’ Aren’t Sure What To Make Of Its New 2A Division

Supreme Court Allows Texas To Use New Map

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

MASSIVE OBAMACARE IDENTITY FRAUD: 71 People Use One Social Security Number, Fake Identities, Dead People — AND THE SYSTEM APPROVES IT

By The Geller Report

WASHINGTON, D.C. — In a new preliminary report published by the Government Accountability Office (GAO), waste, fraud, and abuse have run rampant through Affordable Care Act marketplace plans, worsening health care plans for Americans, all while enriching big insurance companies.

The new watchdog investigation finds large-scale systemic failures that allow fake identities, dead people, and massive improper use of Social Security numbers to receive Obamacare subsidies. As part of the analysis, GAO even conducted covert operations which even included creating fictitious identities that flooded health insurers with unjustified subsidies. In fact, 100 percent of fake applicants were approved by the ACA Marketplace as recently as late 2024, and 90 percent of fake applicants continue to receive coverage in 2025.

As the report notes, such practices can result in wasteful federal spending on subsidies for enrollees who are not eligible. Further, such practices can result in harm and unexpected costs for consumers. These can include loss of access to medical providers and medications, higher copayments and deductibles, or repayment of subsidies if income or other eligibility was misrepresented.

The GAO investigation was requested by Committee on Energy and Commerce Chairman Brett Guthrie (KY-02), Committee on Ways and Means Chairman Jason Smith (MO-08), and Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (OH-04).

Congressman Jim Jordan (OH-04), Chairman of the House Committee on the Judiciary, said:

“For years, we were told we could keep our plan, keep our doctor, and premiums would go down. None of it happened. This new report confirms what we already knew: under Obamacare, hardworking Americans saw their premiums skyrocket and their healthcare choices shrink, all while fraud benefitted insurance companies. Obamacare was built on lies and broken promises that hurt families and drove up costs.”

Congressman Brett Guthrie (KY-02), Chairman of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, said: 

“Republicans have consistently prioritized protecting patients and taxpayers by ridding our federal health programs of the waste, fraud, and abuse that ultimately drive up costs for patients. Republicans have sounded the alarm on the flawed structural integrity of Obamacare and how Democrats’ failed policies to temporarily prop up the program have exacerbated fraud, hurt patients, increased the burden on American taxpayers, and artificially masked the true health care affordability crisis plaguing Americans today. The concerning findings from GAO’s report further confirm that Republican efforts to strengthen, secure, and sustain our federal health programs are critical and necessary to ensure access to quality health care at prices Americans can afford.”

Congressman Jason Smith (MO-08), Chairman of the House Committee on Ways and Means, said:

“While Democrats defend waste, fraud, and abuse, Republicans are taking action to lower health care costs and protect care for all real, living Americans. GAO’s troubling report is the smoking gun that shows how this broken system, shielded by Democrat policies, has led to the federal government shoveling tens of billions of tax dollars to insurance companies through identity fraud and caused health care costs to skyrocket for all Americans. While Obamacare fraud is being confirmed by GAO, CMS, CBO and other outside reports, patients are suffering. They face higher health care costs and denied claims or delayed care when their providers struggle to verify which insurance is valid due to these fraud schemes. Rather than simply rubber stamp more bad spending and failed policies, we must take action to prevent further harm.”

GAO investigated the scope of improper payments and weakened program integrity within the ACA marketplace. Estimates based on analysis by both the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and independent external research organizations indicate millions of enrollees in the ACA marketplaces may be enrolled improperly, costing taxpayers as much as $27 billion a year in improper payments and imposing a great deal of harm and distress on families and victims of alleged fraud.

BACKGROUND:

Investigators Created Fake Identities – and CMS Provided Taxpayer Subsidies

  • GAO created fictitious identities with fake or never issued SSNs and still got subsidized ACA coverage, meaning criminals and fraudsters can too.
  • 100 percent of fake applicants were approved in late 2024.
  • 18 out of 20 fake applicants are still receiving subsidized coverage for 2025.
  • CMS approved coverage even when no documents were requested or fake documents were submitted.
  • This includes fake citizenship eligibility documents confirming fraud concerns for illegal immigrants.
  • Brokers were able to bypass verification by calling the call center and submitting applications without the applicant present.
  • Monthly subsidies paid to health insurers on behalf of GAO’s fake identities exceeded $12,300 per month.

Shocking Misuse of Social Security Numbers Including a Single Social Security Number Used for Over 125 Policies for the Equivalent of 71 Years

  • One Social Security Number (SSN) was used for “71 years” of subsidized coverage.
  • In 2023, one single SSN was used on applications for over 125 insurance policies totaling over 26,000 days of coverage, the equivalent of 71 years.
  • 66,000 SSNs in 2024 had more than a years’ worth of subsidized coverage.
  • CMS does not block new applications using the same SSN and relies on a broken document-request process that often never works.
  • $21 billion in subsidies paid out with no evidence of tax reconciliation in 2023. That is 32 percent of all advanced premium tax credits (APTC) paid to identifiable SSN holders. No reconciliation means no accountability, no verification, and likely billions in improper payments.

Big Insurers Still Collecting Subsidies for Deceased Individuals

  • 58,000 SSNs receiving APTC matched Social Security death data.
  • At least 7,000 were dead before coverage even began, meaning the applications used SSNs of deceased individuals.
  • $94 million in taxpayer-funded subsidies were sent to health insurers on behalf of deceased individuals.

Explosive Growth in Unauthorized Plan Switches that Harm Consumers

  • Bad actors engaged in mass unauthorized enrollment activity to chase commissions, resulting in:
  • 160,000 likely unauthorized changes by three or more brokers in 2024.
  • CMS itself received 275,000 complaints in just eight months (Jan–Aug 2024) from Americans who were enrolled in or switched into plans without their consent.

Repeated Warnings Have Gone Unheeded by Democrats

  • GAO has repeatedly warned that Obamacare subsidies are and have been at risk of fraud structurally.
  • For 2015 enrollment, GAO found that federal and state marketplaces approved coverage for fictitious applicants, and nearly all of those fake identities stayed enrolled—even after submitting fictitious documents or no documents at all.
  • For 2016 enrollment, GAO again reported that CMS had failed to design basic eligibility safeguards, including controls to stop duplicate or overlapping subsidized coverage.
  • These weaknesses were supercharged after Democrats enacted and repeatedly extended Biden’s COVID-era subsidy expansions, which facilitated millions of fully subsidized fraudulent enrollments, and without corresponding fraud controls, created the perfect environment for criminals, identity thieves, and unscrupulous brokers.

With Stronger Integrity for Taxpayers, Republicans Have Taken Steps to Lower Premiums

  • Republicans are focused on restoring accountability and fairness to the health care marketplace through program integrity reforms that save taxpayers billions of dollars and drive down costs for everyone:
  • Full income and eligibility verification before subsidies are issued, ensuring assistance goes only to those who qualify.
  • Ending “anytime” enrollment abuse that fueled fraudulent sign-ups and drove premiums higher for everyone.
  • Closing loopholes that allowed illegal immigrants and other ineligible groups to access taxpayer-funded health benefits.

Even the Congressional Budget Office has found that these measures have already produced $185 billion in savings for taxpayers and reduced premiums by 0.6 percent. That’s real savings for working families.

Read more.

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

SCOTUS Approves Lone Star State’s New Congressional Maps

By Family Research Council

With the 2026 midterms looming, the U.S. Supreme Court is officially weighing in on the redistricting arms race between red and blue states. Late Thursday, the nation’s highest judicial authority disagreed with a lower court ruling and instead allowed Texas to implement new congressional district maps expected to take five seats in the U.S. House of Representatives from Democrats and hand them to the GOP.

A divided three-judge panel consisting of two federal district court judges and one appellate court judge ruled late last month that the new congressional district maps Texas planned were unlawful, charging the state legislature with remaking congressional districts on racial lines, rather than along political ones. Six of the Supreme Court’s nine justices reversed the lower court’s decision. “Texas is likely to succeed on the merits of its claim that the District Court committed at least two serious errors. First, the District Court failed to honor the presumption of legislative good faith by construing ambiguous direct and circumstantial evidence against the legislature,” the court’s majority wrote in a two-page order halting the lower court’s injunction. “Second, the District Court failed to draw a dispositive or near-dispositive adverse inference against respondents even though they did not produce a viable alternative map that met the State’s avowedly partisan goals.”

The Supreme Court’s progressive wing, comprised of Democrat-appointed Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson, issued a 17-page dissenting opinion authored by Kagan and joined by Sotomayor and Jackson. “In enacting an electoral map slanted toward Republicans, did Texas predominantly use race to draw its new district lines? Or said otherwise, did Texas accomplish its partisan objectives by means of a racial gerrymander?” Kagan asked. “Texas largely divided its citizens along racial lines to create its new pro-Republican House map, in violation of the Constitution’s Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments,” she continued, noting the lower court’s decision. “Yet this Court reverses that judgment based on its perusal, over a holiday weekend, of a cold paper record. We are a higher court than the District Court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision.”

“That is why we are supposed to use a clear-error standard of review — why we are supposed to uphold the District Court’s decision that race-based line-drawing occurred (even if we would have ruled differently) so long as it is plausible,” she wrote. The clear-error standard of review is an appellate standard, under which “a finding is ‘clearly erroneous’ when, although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed,” according to the Supreme Court in United States v. United States Gypsum Co. “Without so much as a word about that standard, this Court today announces that Texas may run next year’s elections with a map the District Court found to have violated all our oft-repeated strictures about the use of race in districting,” Kagan continued. “Today’s order disrespects the work of a District Court that did everything one could ask to carry out its charge — that put aside every consideration except getting the issue before it right. And today’s order disserves the millions of Texans whom the District Court found were assigned to their new districts based on their race.”

Justice Thomas Alito, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, responded to Kagan’s argument in a three-paragraph concurring opinion. “Texas needs certainty on which map will govern the 2026 midterm elections, so I will not delay the Court’s order by writing a detailed response to each of the dissent’s arguments. Instead, I offer two short points which for me are decisive,” Alito wrote. “First, the dissent does not dispute — because it is indisputable — that the impetus for the adoption of the Texas map (like the map subsequently adopted in California) was partisan advantage pure and simple.”

“Second, the clear-error standard of review does not apply here because the ‘trial court base[d] its findings upon a mistaken impression of applicable legal principles,’” Alito clarified. “Because of the correlation between race and partisan preference, litigants can easily use claims of racial gerrymandering for partisan ends. … To prevent this, our precedents place the burden on the challengers ‘to disentangle race and politics,’” he continued. “Thus, when the asserted reason for a map is political, it is critical for challengers to produce an alternative map that serves the State’s allegedly partisan aim just as well as the map the State adopted.” It is common, in such cases, for challengers to present an alternative map that achieves the stated partisan objectives without racially gerrymandering. However, Alito observed, the challengers in the Texas could not do so, “giving rise to a strong inference that the State’s map was indeed based on partisanship, not race.” He emphasized, “Neither the duration of the District Court’s hearing nor the length of its majority opinion provides an excuse for failing to apply the correct legal standards as set out clearly in our case law.”

In comments to The Washington Stand, FRC Action Director Matt Carpenter hailed the Supreme Court’s decision. “The Supreme Court handed Texas Republicans, and by extension Republicans in Congress, a huge victory in the redistricting war by restoring Texas’s congressional maps last night,” he said. “This emergency order from the highest court in the land does more than restore five new potentially red congressional districts, it signals that this court is unlikely to side with frivolous claims of racial discrimination in the gerrymandering process from leftwing lawyers like Marc Elias — whose legal group represented one of the plaintiffs in this case, and has gone to great lengths to hurt election integrity wherever it has advanced,” Carpenter continued. “This could have huge ramifications as we also expect a decision from the Supreme Court on Louisiana vs. Callais, a case with the potential to strike down Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which would open up as many as 19 other congressional districts for redistricting.”

The Supreme Court only issued a stay on Thursday, halting a lower court’s injunction. However, the justices are deliberating over a similar set of circumstances, originating in Louisiana. In the dual cases of Louisiana v. Phillip Callais and Press Robinson v. Phillip Callais, since consolidated into a single case, the Supreme Court will consider Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA), which bars racial gerrymandering, and reconsider its own precedents on the issue. Congressional district maps drawn by Louisiana’s state legislature in 2022 only created one majority-black congressional district out of the state’s six, despite the fact that roughly one-third of the state’s population is black. In response to a lawsuit accusing them of racial gerrymandering, Louisiana legislators remade the maps, yielding two majority-black districts. Those remade maps, however, were subsequently challenged, also on racial grounds: this time, the argument was that the new maps were racial gerrymandering because they were explicitly redrawn along racial lines.

In the midst of oral arguments in October, a majority of justices appeared poised to render Section 2 toothless and dilute its own precedents on the issue. In a line of questioning that would have been almost equally applicable to the Texas case, Alito asked, “If registered, Democrats overwhelmingly vote for Democratic candidates, regardless of the candidate’s race. Is that bloc voting?” Querying the relationship between redistricting along political lines and redistricting along racial lines, he continued, “Likewise, if registered Republicans overwhelmingly vote for Republican candidates, that’s not bloc voting. … So if it happens to be that people of one race or another race overwhelmingly prefer one of the political parties, does that transform the situation into racial voting? Or is it still just partisan voting?”

Accusations of racial gerrymandering have often been used by progressive voting groups to challenge and block Republican-led redistricting efforts. The Supreme Court’s decision in the Texas case could potentially indicate which way the Justices may rule in the Louisiana matter. A decision to neuter Section 2 allows red states to move forward with partisan redistricting maps, eliminating over a dozen Democrat-held House seats.

AUTHOR

S.A. McCarthy

S.A. McCarthy serves as a news writer at The Washington Stand.

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2025 Family Research Council.


Partner with The Washington Stand to bring news from a biblical worldview to readers nationwide. From now until December 31, every gift will be doubled through our year-end Challenge Match.

The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

Large Scale Voter Fraud Rocks Michigan

By The Geller Report

Serious questions are mounting in Michigan as state lawmakers raise alarms over what they describe as large-scale voter registration irregularities — including tens of thousands of new registrations flagged with invalid Social Security numbers and a voter roll that reportedly exceeds the state’s adult population by roughly half a million names.

State Sen. Johnson has publicly warned that Michigan’s election system is “wide open for abuse,” pointing directly to the Help America Vote Verification System (HAVV) — the database intended to confirm the accuracy of voter registration information.

According to Johnson, roughly 100,000 people registered to vote in Michigan last year, and 36% of them — about 36,000 applicants — submitted invalid four-digit Social Security number matches, yet were still allowed to complete registration.

“This should never happen,” he said. “If those numbers cannot be verified, the registration should not go through. Period.”

Johnson also claims Michigan’s voter rolls now contain around 500,000 more registered voters than the state has voting-age adults, raising renewed concerns about non-citizen registrations, outdated rolls, and potential systemic vulnerabilities.

“How many of those are non-citizens?” Johnson asked. “How many are unverifiable? How many shouldn’t be registered at all?”

Compounding the controversy, Johnson alleges that Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson has shared Michigan voter data with outside nonprofits, a move he argues gives partisan operatives unprecedented access to the state’s voter information.

“We know that Jocelyn Benson has shared Michigan voter data with nonprofits,” Johnson said. “Every Democratic operative in America has access to our voter data if they want it.”

State officials have not confirmed these claims, and Benson’s office has previously defended its data-sharing practices as legal and routine. But the numbers Johnson is presenting have intensified calls for a full audit of Michigan’s voter rolls, verification systems, and data distribution practices.

Large scale voter fraud taking place in Michigan

  • 36% of new voter registrations last year have invalid Social Security numbers but were allowed to complete voter registration anyway
  • Michigan has 500,000 more voters registered than we have voting age adults

“A state senator, Johnson has sounded the alarm about election insecurity in Michigan. Johnson points to the Help America Vote Verification System.

Last year, 100,000 people registered to vote in Michigan. 36% of them, 36,000 had invalid four-digit Social Security numbers and they were allowed to register anyway

Michigan has 500,000 more voters registered than we have voting age adults. How many of those are non-citizens?“

“We know that Jocelyn Benson, our Secretary of State, has shared Michigan voter data with nonprofits — Every Democrat operative in America has access to our voter data if they want it”

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

POSTS ON X: 

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Iranian-Run, Soros-Funded Billboards Urge Soldiers to Disobey Orders

By Jihad Watch

This is not only sedition; it’s a national security threat.

Billboards are popping up outside Fort Bragg and Camp Lejeune urging soldiers to disobey orders. “Marines: Not what you signed up for?” asks one. “Did You Go Airborne Just To Pull Security for ICE?” asks another one. The website urges soldiers to use encryption and offers ‘counselling’ on ‘disobeying immoral orders’. The organizations offering ‘counselling’ to soldiers include the National Lawyers Guild: a Communist organization which also defends Antifa.

The billboards are promoting a system that, in its own words, is “built to connect active duty, national guard, and reserve members of the military with key resources on responding to unlawful orders”. What that means is members of the military will be potentially discussing their orders with members of radical leftist groups sympathetic to America’s enemies.

This is not only sedition; it’s a national security threat.

‘Win Without War’, the group behind the ads, had been created as a front group full of young photogenic diverse figures by the Center for International Policy (itself created by the Institute for Policy Studies, to oppose the Vietnam War and any resistance to Communism) which has sponsored trips by members of Congress to Cuba, and is funded by Soros and the Rockefellers.

The radical leftist group also announced that it’s standing with the ‘Sedition Six’ in urging troops to disobey orders and circulating a letter stating that “we the people have their backs.”

Who is “we the people”? An Iranian immigrant who defends Iran and hates America.

The ads were tweeted by Sara Haghdoosti: an Iranian immigrant who heads up Win Without War. Haghdoosti, the author of a teen novel about ‘Islamophobia’, told MoveOn.org that “I moved to the U.S. to help start Berim, a new organization to amplify Iranian voices, get people outside of Iran engaged, and change foreign policy.”

Berim, meaning “Let’s Go” in Farsi, was billed as helping Iranian ‘social entrepreneurs’, in practice the organization served as a pro-Iran pressure group, urging Obama to meet with Iran’s leader (as part of a petition started by Haghdoosti), lobbying Congress to oppose sanctions and any action against Iran’s nuclear program. Berim cosigned letters alongside NIAC, known to many as a key part of the ‘Iran Lobby’, defending Iran’s nuclear program against America.

While Berim pretended to be a ‘grassroots’ group, it was closely intertwined with a network of leftist organizations opposed to America which became obvious when Win Without War ‘acquired’ Berim and Haghdoosti eventually became the executive director of Win Without War.

Like a lot of leftist anti-war groups, Win is opposed to America, Israel, and our other allies and supportive of our enemies. And that includes dismantling our weapons and defending theirs.

Sara Haghdoosti had claimed that opposing Iran’s nuclear weapons was a “racist trope” and revealed that President Trump’s ‘Muslim Ban’ would have prevented her mother from coming to visit her in America. At the same time, she has urged the dismantling of our nuclear defenses.

The incitement to treason ads escalated Win’s campaign to wreck the military into personally targeted attacks at the chain of command. Win is not a group focused on illegal aliens so it isn’t targeting soldiers because it cares about ICE, but because it wants to weaken our armed forces.

And the prime beneficiaries of such a campaign are in Haghdoosti’s homeland in Iran.

That an Iranian immigrant who has lobbied for our enemies and against our national defense can run an organization that is registered as a 501(c)(4) and a 501(c)(3) urging soldiers to disobey orders shows just how out of control the network of radical leftist groups has gotten.

Win Without War’s treasonous activities are heavily subsidized by George Soros and his son Alex through their Open Society networks. Win received $1 million from the Soros network in 2024 as part of $2.2 million over the years and its Center for International Policy parent had received $300,000 in startup costs to create the front group to undermine America.

Win is just part of a larger network of interchangeable organizations. The Center for International Policy had been set up by yet another front group of a front group whose trail ultimately led to the Soviet Union. Win has been funded not only by Soros, but other key leftist funding hubs including the Ford Foundation, Ploughshares and the Rockefeller Brothers Fund. Ploughshares had funded Haghdoosti’s Berim as part of Obama’s Iran Deal echo chamber.

After being pipelined through MoveOn.org, Haghdoosti is returning to the group where her husband Ilya Sheyman, also an immigrant, had served as its executive director to become its program director. Sheyman, who ran for Congress as a young ‘community organizer’ with Howard Dean’s backing on an Occupy Wall Street platform, now runs a political consulting firm with another MoveOn alum. Haghdoosti is still pitching her teen novel about ‘Islamophobia’.

Americans may not be living the American Dream anymore, but it’s still possible for two foreigners to live the dream of a million dollar Victorian house in a mostly white area, a lavish wedding and a career track of working to destroy America and the rest of the free world.

Haghdoosti is not the real issue. It’s the radical system that has become so arrogant that it can put out billboards targeting American soldiers through an organization run by an Iranian immigrant who defends her homeland and attacks America. The network of organizations and activists behind front groups like Win Without War are arrogant and they have reason to be.

No matter what they’ve done until now, nothing has touched them. Will that finally change?

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Hamas-linked CAIR: Elimination of deportation protection for Somalis in Minnesota is part of ‘Israel first’ campaign

New York City: Pro-Hamas agitators harass Black Friday shoppers at Zara store in Manhattan

Enraged at Trump, Somali Muslims in Minnesota say they’re ‘a backbone of the state’

DOT DROPS THE HAMMER: Sean Duffy Warns Tim Walz To Revoke Illegals Commercial Licenses Or Lose Highway Funding

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Republicans Hold On To House Seat In Tennessee

By The Daily Caller

Republican Tennessee congressional candidate Matt Van Epps won the special election Tuesday for Tennessee’s 7th Congressional District, securing 81,017 votes (52.4%) over Democratic Tennessee congressional candidate Aftyn Behn, who received 71,912 votes (46.5%), with 93% of votes in, according to The New York Post.

Former Republican Tennessee Rep. Mark Green resigned in July, stepping down fewer than six months into his fourth term. The 7th District — which President Donald Trump carried by 20 points in 2024 — drew millions of dollars from both of the two major political parties in the run-up to Tuesday’s vote, despite Republicans historically dominating the area. Van Epps ultimately kept the seat in GOP hands.

Van Epps is a West Point graduate and former Army helicopter pilot who completed multiple overseas deployments, including in Iraq and Afghanistan. He later served in the Tennessee Army National Guard, eventually rising to the rank of lieutenant colonel.

Van Epps briefly led the Tennessee Department of General Services after being appointed commissioner in late 2024 before resigning to run for Congress. He won the crowded Republican special primary in October with the help of a late endorsement from Trump.

Behn is a progressive Tennessee state lawmaker and longtime activist who built her political profile through protests and direct-action campaigns at the state Capitol. She has repeatedly taken combative stances against Tennessee’s Republican leadership, including a confrontation in 2019 that led to her removal — by force — from Republican Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee’s office. In another incident, she was also removed from the House chamber.

Behn aligned herself with far-left positions on issues like abortion access, transgender policies and policing. She frequently promoted views that placed her well outside of Tennessee’s political mainstream. In earlier public statements and podcast appearances, she criticized Nashville, called Tennessee a “racist state,” and urged radical approaches to social policy.

“I hate the city, I hate the bachelorettes, I hate the pedal taverns, I hate country music, I hate all of the things that make Nashville apparently an ‘it’ city to the rest of the country. But I hate it,” Behn said on the “Year old GRITS” podcast in February 2020.

AUTHOR

Mariane Angela

News Reporter

RELATED ARTICLES:

Republican Matt Van Epps Wins Tennessee Special Election

Aftyn Behn Refuses To Tell CNN Whether More Money For Cops Is Good Or Bad

‘Of No Further Force Or Effect’: Trump Puts Anyone Pardoned By Biden’s Autopen On Notice

Marco Rubio Has One Of Greatest College Football Playoff Takes Of All Time

RELATED VIDEO: The North Carolina DMV is making dramatic changes to its voter registration

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

Betrayed American Workers Expose Dark Underbelly Of H-1B Visa Scheme

By The Daily Caller

They were promised lucrative and stable careers if they “learned to code” and earned a degree in software engineering.

Instead, many Americans in the tech industry have been left disillusioned as they face mass layoffs and chronic unemployment — a crisis they say stems from an addiction to cheap foreign labor pipelines that are made accessible through programs like H-1B, and are touted by companies as a way to hire the “best and brightest.”

“At this point, I’m doing something else,” Jonathan, a cybersecurity professional who is leaving the industry entirely out of frustration, told the Daily Caller News Foundation. “My career is basically dead in the water because of these problems.”

Jonathan lost his job in the industry in November 2024 and in the months since, he’s submitted well over 200 applications for tech-related positions in the Seattle area, but received a grand total of zero offers — despite five years of experience and purportedly demonstrating high competency in every interview assessment thrown his way.

He wished to be identified only by his first name out of fear of retribution from past and potential employers, as did most of the seven tech employees who spoke with the DCNF.

Controversy surrounding the H-1B program, which very publicly split President Donald Trump’s inner circle shortly before he began his second term, has once again shot onto the national scene as the White House gives mixed signals on the program’s benefits. The issue has proven divisive for the Republican leader, who was elected to office on a pro-worker platform, but also has powerful allies in the tech world.

When reached for comment, the White House referred to recent statements made by press secretary Karoline Leavitt.

“The president does not support American workers being replaced,” Leavitt told a group of reporters earlier in November. “The president has a very nuanced, common-sense opinion on this issue … but ultimately [he] wants to see American workers in those jobs… There’s been a lot of misunderstanding of the president’s position.”

‘Disillusioned’

Public data suggests that many American engineers are being passed over for foreign workers.

Throughout 2025, major technology companies such as Microsoft, Meta, Amazon and Intel underwent layoffs — continuing what has been a years-long trend in the industry. The workers interviewed by the DCNF were not employed at these specific tech companies.

Roughly 428,000 tech workers lost their job between 2022 and 2023, and a total of 384 tech companies handed pink slips to roughly 124,000 workers in 2024, according to the Institute for Sound Public Policy (ISPP).

While H-1Bs have an outsized influence on the tech world, workers across all major industries are impacted by imported foreign labor.

The flow of H-1B workers into the U.S. has largely kept apace despite these mass layoffs, with the ISPP finding that the number of H-1B visa workers has grown 80% since the Great Recession low in 2011. Experts estimate that nearly 660,000 H-1B workers were living in the U.S. in October 2024.

Established by Congress in 1990, the H-1B program was originally intended to utilize “highly specialized” foreign labor, according to the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. Although it’s a nonimmigrant visa, H-1B holders can eventually become eligible to apply for legal permanent residence, allowing them to stay in the country indefinitely.

The tech industry dominates the use of H-1Bs, with tech companies accounting for nearly 70% of H-1B petitions annually, according to Nation Connections, a site dedicated to helping individuals navigate immigration laws in different countries.

Other American-born tech workers have shared similar experiences to Jonathan’s, and have stayed silent due to fear of retaliation.

“I do feel kind of disillusioned with the industry,” said Riley, who graduated with a software engineering degree in 2021. “Software engineers have a higher unemployment rate right now than art history majors.”

Art history majors have a 3% unemployment rate, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, which compiled data released in February. Computer engineering majors, on the other hand, currently suffer from a 7.5% unemployment rate.

Riley said he noticed a monumental shift in the hiring practices of an Austin-based company he worked at for several years. He claims the company — which had faced consistent complaints from engineers about pay — increasingly staffed its engineering departments with employees from South America and eventually established an office in Colombia to better utilize the continent’s workforce.

“I believe that that was done in order to, you know, reduce their labor costs so that they could get engineers without negotiating with [the American-born engineers] or caving to their demands,” Riley said.

Jonathan described a similar situation after the California-based company he worked for introduced an India development center. Roughly six months after the center was launched, he said the company stopped hiring outside of India altogether. About a year after he left, Jonathan’s former coworker informed him that around half of the company’s security personnel was let go.

“You’re going to lose advancement opportunities, you’re going to have HR problems and you’re going to be not a team player if you don’t advocate with open arms the idea of an Indian development center being opened up to your company or a billion H-1Bs flooding the market,” Jonathan said about the situation he was facing and the continued pressure to not speak out.

‘We’re All In The Process Of Being Replaced’

India stands far above any other nation as the top source of foreign labor, making up 72% of all H-1B recipients between October 2022 and September 2023, per a March 2024 report from the Department of Homeland Security.

“We’re all in the process of being replaced,” John, who worked for an insurance company in Connecticut, told the DCNF.

John said there were around 350 IT employees — all purportedly American — at his company when he first began in 2006. Throughout his decade at the company, he claims they were all steadily booted out in favor of foreign workers.

“Most of the time they had them train their Indian replacements before they left as a condition of receiving their severance,” he told the DCNF. “So what I saw over a period of time was a whole bunch of lives being destroyed.”

“A lot of the younger kids can’t find employment,” John said of the industry. “They spent a whole bunch of money learning all of this stuff — computer programs, cloud platforms, this that the other thing — but they can’t find work.”

The tech employees who spoke to the DCNF are struggling to find work in the U.S. at a time when college debt has skyrocketed to historical highs. Roughly 44 million Americans owe more than $1.7 trillion in student debt, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Engineering degrees in general are consistently ranked as one of the costliest to earn.

Like his coworkers before him, John was ultimately “replaced” and handed a severance agreement that forbids him from discussing the matter publicly.

“Coming home to western Washington from Alaska, I assumed that finding a better-paying job would be no issue — we are home to some of the nation’s largest tech companies,” Luke Hawthorne told the DCNF. “I spent nearly a year over 2022 and 2023 searching for my current job, a job which pays me about the same as I was making before.”

While Hawthorne still considers himself lucky to be employed, he said his current salary “doesn’t even approach” the threshold it takes to afford a home in his area of Washington State. His home state’s software developer workforce grew by more than 16% through H-1B certifications over just a 9-month period, with 83% of these positions approved at or below Washington State’s median wage, according to public data he analyzed and shared with the DCNF.

“The ‘best and brightest’ argument simply doesn’t square with how the program is being used,” Hawthorne said. “Another important aspect of it is that you aren’t competing just with the new arrivals, but with all of the tech workers who have been replaced — I have friends with talent and experience who have been out of work for years.”

Many of the tech workers who spoke to the DCNF have since become involved with U.S. Tech Workers, an advocacy group that highlights the plight of American employees negatively affected by the H-1B program and pushes Washington, D.C., for change.

Trump, who has implemented some of the most hawkish immigration policies since returning to office, has appeared to give mixed signals on the issue as major players within his own inner circle disagree over reform.

The president’s coalition appeared fragmented in the weeks leading up to his second presidential inauguration, with business magnate Elon Musk touting H-1Bs in December 2024 and Vivek Ramaswamy suggesting that the U.S. needs foreign talent because American culture “venerated mediocrity over excellence.” Georgia GOP Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, a former a top Trump ally who is resigning from Congress, said in November she would introduce legislation completely phasing out the H-1B program, accusing tech companies of abusing the system at the expense of Americans.

Trump initially appeared to side with the pro-H-1B faction, declaring in December 2024 that he was “a believer” in the visa program. In what appeared to be a major shift into the pro-American worker camp, Trump in September signed a proclamation slapping a $100,000 fee on all new H-1B applications, but opponents of the program have criticized the fee’s limitations and workarounds. Earlier in November, Trump once again publicly touted the need for H-1Bs to import foreign workers.

As Washington, D.C., continues to debate the value of H-1Bs, American tech workers say they’ve been left out to dry.

“I graduated college seven years ago and I remember in high school them telling us, ‘learn to code and you’ll have a good job,’” Joseph Ibrahim, an unemployed tech worker based in Florida, told the DCNF. “Well, it turns out they outsource the coding jobs also, not just the manufacturing jobs.”

Ibrahim got a degree in information systems, business analytics and information systems, but has been struggling to find work since April. Unlike many of the tech workers who spoke to the DCNF, he had no problem being identified by his full name.

“What are they gonna do?” Ibrahim asked. “They’re already not hiring me.”

“You know, if I went into college and on the pamphlet, there were like, ‘pros and cons of studying something in computer science: you may have to train your replacement at some point in your career,’ I would have never studied this,” he said.

AUTHOR

Jason Hopkins

Immigration Reporter

RELATED ARTICLE: Major Democrat Donor Has Sizeable Stake In Pot Company Raided By ICE

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

‘Cascade Of Systemic Failures’: Minnesota State Employees Blast Walz For ‘Massive Fraud’ In Social Services

By The Daily Caller

Minnesota state employees accused Democratic Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz of bearing full responsibility for massive fraud that drained the state’s social services programs, claiming he retaliated against whistleblowers who tried to sound the alarm.

“Tim Walz is 100% responsible for massive fraud in Minnesota,” the employees wrote in a statement posted to social media. They described a “cascade of systemic failures” and alleged Walz “systematically retaliated against whistleblowers using monitoring, threats, repression, and did his best to discredit fraud reports.”

The accusations come as federal prosecutors pursue cases involving more than $1 billion in stolen taxpayer funds across three separate schemes. Prosecutors have secured 59 convictions so far in fraud tied to pandemic feeding programs, housing assistance and autism therapy services.

Tim Walz is 100% responsible for massive fraud in Minnesota. We let Tim Walz know of fraud early on, hoping for a partnership in stopping fraud but no, we got the opposite response. Tim Walz systematically retaliated against whistleblowers using monitoring, threats, repression,… https://t.co/cEtbnuKmgn

— Minnesota Department of Human Service Employees (@Minnesota_DHS) November 30, 2025

The whistleblowers claimed agency leaders appointed by Walz “willfully disregarded rules and laws to keep fraud reports quiet” and were “not qualified for their jobs, instead getting leadership jobs via Tim Walz’s friendship.” Staff who witnessed fraud were “shutdown, reassigned and told to keep quiet,” according to the statement.

The employees named several officials they say have escaped accountability, including Shireen Gandhi, Jess Geil, Jodi Harpstead, Natasha Merz and Eric Grumdahl.

Walz has denied that concerns about racism allegations slowed his administration’s response. He told the New York Times his administration “erred on the side of generosity” during the pandemic and pointed to new fraud prevention measures.

President Donald Trump has drawn national attention to the scandal, calling Minnesota “a hub of fraudulent money laundering activity” and Walz “seriously retarded” in a Truth Social post. Asked by reporters if he stood by the remark, Trump replied, “Yeah, there’s something wrong with Walz.”

“Do you stand by that claim of calling Tim Walz retarded?”@POTUS: “Yeah, there’s something wrong with Walz.” 🤣 https://t.co/pA9dcj0fNw pic.twitter.com/DPHhv3mRpb

— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) November 30, 2025

The whistleblowers said they are now appealing to federal authorities for help. “We can’t fight fraud in Minnesota alone,” they wrote.

AUTHOR

Mark Tanos

Contributor

RELATED ARTICLES:

Trump Terminates Protected Status Of Minnesota Somalis Over ‘Fraudulent,’ ‘Terrorizing’ Activities

DHS Reportedly Flagged Thousands Of Afghans For ‘National Security’ Concerns Who Were Brought Into Country By Biden

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Give Thanks for the Fossil Fuel Industry

By The Daily Signal

Just by living in 21st-century America, you have a lot to be thankful for.

You live in the richest country in the history of the world—and one of the freest. Despite what the left claims, the benefits of wealth aren’t limited to the 1%. The amenities most people take for granted—a vehicle, washing machine, hot water on demand—would have been unimaginable luxuries for most of human history. Among poor families in America, significant majorities have air conditioning systems, televisions, microwaves and smartphones.

We’ve come a long way from what the Pilgrims had to celebrate at the first Thanksgiving. Over half of the settlers had died during the previous winter. The remaining settlers were grateful for a harvest that would help them survive the upcoming winter.

Today, most people are concerned with how many servings of turkey they can eat while still having enough room for pumpkin pie.

It’d be impossible to list all the changes over the last four centuries that have turned scarcity into opulence. The bravery and sacrifice of members of the military are near the top of the list.

So is the fossil fuel industry.

You didn’t have to hunt your turkey, kill it and clean it. A farmer did that on a farm powered primarily by fossil fuels. A truck powered by fossil fuels drove it to your supermarket. Your supermarket used fossil fuels to keep its lights on, its freezer cold and its credit card readers humming. You used fossil fuels to drive there and buy it. That’s true even if you have an electric car, because electric cars plug into an electric grid mostly powered by coal and natural gas. Fossil fuels will also heat the oven used to cook your turkey. The lights you turn on during Thanksgiving dinner, the TV you use to watch football and the dishwasher you use to clean up all run primarily on fossil fuels.

Renewable energy gets all the publicity, but wind and solar power generated only about 14% of the nation’s electricity in 2023. Fossil fuels generated 60%, with nuclear and hydropower generating over 24%.

When the Pilgrims got cold, they had to chop wood and burn it. Today, you push a button on your thermostat. Going to see family? Airplanes use fossil fuels. The iPhone you use to FaceTime Grandma wouldn’t exist without the power provided by fossil fuels.

This doesn’t mean fossil fuel companies are perfect. It doesn’t mean that there aren’t externalities to fossil fuel production, although it’s hard to take environmental alarmists seriously after decades of failed predictions. It doesn’t mean that someday a different fuel source, like nuclear power, won’t replace fossil fuels.

But without fossil fuels, Thanksgiving dinner and everything else in American life would look entirely different—and not in a good way.

Happy Thanksgiving.

COPYRIGHT 2025 CREATORS.COM 

AUTHOR

Victor Joecks

Victor Joecks is a columnist for the Las Vegas Review-Journal. Victor on X: @VictorJoecks.

Interview with Climate Scientist Tom Harris: What was COP30 in Brazil and what will it mean to citizens of Western nations

By Vlad Tepes Blog

With the left, the point is never the point, the revolution is always the point.

So when politicians have an international conference on an issue which is scientific (or medical) in nature, and what readers of this site know is in fact, a Line of Operation supported not by science, but by media driven mass line narrative attacks against the public, then it is good to sit down with a scientist and set the record straight.

Determining that the science does not support the policies is important to do, to negate the propaganda in the minds of the target audience. Which is all of us of course.

But what ultimately will be more important as the state launches more and more attacks on reality, is to be able to identify them as they happen, and know their true purpose. Like the Mass Graves at Residential schools. Which is another mass line, (this time intended to negate the right to own property or set rational limits to immigration)  and one that may not be questioned for fear of cancellation, and soon, actual criminal charges. Ministry of Truth stuff. Maybe even Ministry of Love.

As with Covid, the real issue should have been, and remains, ‘The state does NOT HAVE THE RIGHT to implement ANY of the measures it did against the public.’

In other words, the state made up a pseudo-crisis, partly real or totally imagined, which they then claimed justified exceeding state powers by orders of magnitude to mitigate. The point was obviously the power grab, as it had nothing to do with the claimed issue.

To call the new powers Ultra Vires would be an understatement.

To call them the first major wave of a communist revolution would be exactly to the point.

Canada at one point even implemented the ultimate negation of basic rights of a free people. The destruction of the right of exit. You could not leave the country without submitting to experimental mRNA injections and you had to have proof that you did, just to leave. This is not the stuff of a republic. This is the ultimate test of a communist polity. As the old saying goes, free nations have walls to keep people out. Communist nations have walls to keep people in.

So it was refreshing to sit down with Tom Harris and go over both the facts of the claims made by those who use climate as a way of destroying Western industry and liberties, as well as the consequences of agreements signed by nations that flew their private jets into the Brazilian jungle to force there rest of its to give up our cars.

Tom Harris on Brazil COP 30 climate conference Nov 28 2025

A previous talk by Tom Harris on climate facts. Tom mentioned the co-founder of Greenpeace, Patrick Moore.

Tom Harris: All The Facts You Need To Debunk ‘Climate Change’ Scammers

We interviewed him on this topic in November of 2021:

RAIR Exclusive Interview with Greenpeace Founder Patrick Moore

RAIR Foundation has this article pertaining to this interview with Tom Harris as well.

EDITORS NOTE: This Vlad Tepes Blog column posted by Eeyore is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Trump Says He’s Ending Biden Executive Orders Signed With Autopen

By The Daily Caller

President Donald Trump announced the termination of executive orders from former President Joe Biden’s time in office allegedly signed using an autopen in a Friday social media post.

Trump claimed people surrounding Biden in the White House “took the Presidency away from him” using the autopen and noted the importance of executive orders coming directly from the president. The president’s move followed Attorney General Pam Bondi opening a probe into allegations of a digital autopen being used to sign pardons and other executive orders in response to a House Oversight Committee report.

“Any document signed by Sleepy Joe Biden with the Autopen, which was approximately 92% of them, is hereby terminated, and of no further force or effect. The autopen is not allowed to be used if approval is not specifically given by the President of the United States,” Trump wrote.

“The Radical Left Lunatics circling Biden around the beautiful Resolute Desk in the Oval Office took the Presidency away from him. I am hereby cancelling all Executive Orders, and anything else that was not directly signed by Crooked Joe Biden, because the people who operated the autopen did so illegally. Joe Biden was not involved in the autopen process and, if he says he was, He will be brought up on charges of perjury,” Trump continued.

Former Biden aide Neera Tanden testified in June to the House Oversight Committee that she was allowed to direct the use of the autopen from October 2021 to May 2023 while serving as the president’ staff secretary and senior advisor, according to opening remarks obtained by the Washington Examiner. She also told the committee her contact with Biden was minimal and she was not certain exactly who gave final approval for the autopen’s use, Republican House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer said via a statement.

Trump told the Daily Caller that he was recognizing the Biden presidency in a “Presidential Wall of Fame” with a “Biden Autopen” portrait in an Aug. 29 interview.

pic.twitter.com/PGcQQfauCU

— JD Vance (@JDVance) March 16, 2025

AUTHOR

Daily Caller Staff

Contributor

RELATED ARTICLES:

President Trump FULLY NULLIFIES ALL BIDEN AUTOPEN Documents – 92% Of Them.

Pro-Terror Mobs Storm NYC Apple Store in Brazen Daylight Looting

President Trump: “I Will permanently Pause Migration From All Third World Countries.”

EXCLUSIVE: Full Transcript: Daily Caller Interviews President Donald Trump

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

198 Far Left House Democrats Voted Against Ensuring Only American Citizens Vote In Our Elections

By Editorial Board – DrRichSwier.com

/in , , , , , , , , , , , , /by

198 House Democrats voted against the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, which requires individuals to provide proof of citizenship when registering to vote in federal elections. The only logical reason for Far Left Democrats to vote against the SAVE Act is that they want the millions of illegal immigrants they let into our country with their failed open borders agenda to vote in our elections in a desperate attempt to maintain their grip on power.

Today’s vote is also just the latest example of Far Left House Democrats having the opportunity to end the Biden border crisis and electing to allow the historic invasion that jeopardizes the safety and security of every American to continue.

FACTS ABOUT THE SAVE ACT (Courtesy of Speaker Mike Johnson):

  • While falsely claiming the 2016 was “stolen” due to “foreign election interference,” Democrats ignore the real threat of foreign election interference posed when noncitizens are allowed to register and vote in U.S. elections.
  • Lax voter registration laws make it possible for noncitizens to register and vote in federal elections while campaign finance loopholes allow noncitizens to fund U.S. election activities – both of which can affect the outcome of our elections.
  • There is ample evidence that noncitizens are voting in U.S. elections:
    • A 2014 study that analyzed the 2008 and 2010 elections concluded that not only had noncitizens illegally voted in U.S. elections but also that the votes of noncitizens likely determined the outcome in certain races.
    • In states like Massachusetts, Ohio, and Virginia, noncitizens have recently been removed from the voting rolls, and many of those noncitizens had voted.
    • The Arizona Secretary of State website is currently falsely promoting the idea that individuals who fail to present proof of citizenship when registering will “be eligible to vote in federal elections.”
  • Recently, the House Committee on Administration reported the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, H.R. 8281, will:
    • Require an individual to provide proof of citizenship when registering to vote in federal elections; and
    • Provide states with access to existing federal databases so they can clean up their voter registration rolls and remove noncitizens from the rolls.
  • Congress must pass the SAVE Act to close the loopholes that allow noncitizen registration and, in turn, voting; to enhance election security; minimize the risk of foreign interference; and restore Americans’ confidence in U.S. elections

©2025 . All rights reserved.

Stop Dragging the U.S. Military Into Anti-Trump Politics

By Oladigbo Oluwasogo Olalekan

One of the great strengths of the United States has always been the clear separation between civilian politics and military professionalism. Presidents change, parties rotate in and out of power, and political arguments flare up—but the armed forces remain steady, disciplined, and loyal to the Constitution.

Today, however, many Americans are becoming increasingly uneasy. They worry that certain Democratic lawmakers, driven by intense political hostility toward former President Donald Trump, may be crossing lines that could unintentionally sow discord within the ranks of the U.S. military.

This concern is not about disagreement. Democrats and Republicans have always disputed policy. That is the heartbeat of a healthy democracy. The issue arises when political rhetoric touches the military chain of command—one of the most sensitive pillars of national stability.

Recent comments by several Democratic lawmakers—including individuals with military or intelligence backgrounds such as Mark Kelly, Elissa Slotkin, Jason Crow, Chris Deluzio, Maggie Goodlander, and Chrissy Houlahan—have sparked controversy. Their public discussions about resisting what they describe as potential “illegal orders” from President Trump have been interpreted by critics as blurring the line between necessary constitutional caution and political messaging that could create confusion within the armed forces.

To be clear: elected officials absolutely have the right to warn against unlawful directives from any president. That safeguard is part of the American system. But when members of Congress make statements that can be read as urging the military to distrust or pre-judge the commander in chief, they risk undermining the unity, discipline, and non partisanship that America depends on.

President Trump responded forcefully, calling such rhetoric “seditious.” The lawmakers in question then portrayed themselves as victims, accusing Trump of incitement. But they have largely dismissed concerns about the potential implications of their own messaging.

Even if these Democrats intended to promote constitutional vigilance, the perception created is dangerous. When military officers hear politicians imply that the armed forces should be prepared to question the legitimacy of presidential orders based solely on political fears, the seeds of division can be planted—whether intentionally or not.

With Secretary of War Pete Hegseth now reportedly investigating the matter, the stakes could not be higher. America cannot afford even the appearance of political parties attempting to shape military loyalty.

At a time when global adversaries are eager to exploit any sign of internal weakness, U.S. leaders—on both sides—must treat military cohesion as sacred. Political disagreements should never spill into the chain of command. No hatred for a political figure, Trump included, should ever justify messaging that risks confusion or distrust among the men and women who defend the nation.

Democrats, like all political actors, must remember that presidents come and go, but the nation remains. The military is not a tool for partisan battles. It is a national institution that deserves protection from political chaos.

America needs its leaders to rise above resentment, reject rhetoric that threatens unity, and reaffirm their commitment to safeguarding the integrity of the armed forces. The country is stronger when political fights stay in the political arena—not in the barracks.

©2025 . All rights reserved.

SEDITION: Pentagon Launches Review of ‘Serious Allegations of Misconduct’ Against Mark Kelly

By The Geller Report

EDITORS NOTE:  The Sedition Act refers to legislation passed in 1798 that made it a crime to publish “false, scandalous, and malicious writing” against the federal government, Congress, or the president. It was part of the Alien and Sedition Acts, aimed at suppressing dissent and was used to silence political opposition during a time of heightened tensions with France. The Act allowed for the deportation, fines, or imprisonment of individuals deemed a threat to national security.


The Pentagon may call Kelly, a retired Navy captain, back to active duty to face court-martial proceedings over a video where he called on service members to refuse orders.

The lawless Democrats have gotten away with murder for far too long. Treason, sedition, political persecution, a soft coup, the list is mind boggling. Action is long overdue.

Pentagon launches review of ‘serious allegations of misconduct’ against Mark Kelly

By: Filip Timotija, The Hill, November 24, 2025:

The Pentagon said Monday that it has received “serious allegations of misconduct” against Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) and has initiated a “thorough review” of the allegations. It comes days after the senator, along with a handful of other lawmakers, called on U.S. service members to disobey any illegal orders issued by the Trump administration.

The Department of Defense said it had initiated an investigation to “determine further actions, which may include recall to active duty for court-martial proceedings or administrative measures.”

“This matter will be handled in compliance with military law, ensuring due process and impartiality,” the statement read. “Further official comments will be limited, to preserve the integrity of the proceedings.”

Kelly said Monday that he had upheld his oath to the Constitution through his time in the Navy and that his time in the military and at NASA was “in service to this country that I love and has given me so much.”

The senator said he heard about the the department’s review from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s post on the social platform X.

“If this is meant to intimidate me and other members of Congress from doing our jobs and holding this administration accountable, it won’t work,” Kelly said in a statement. “I’ve given too much to this country to be silenced by bullies who care more about their own power than protecting the Constitution.”

Kelly was one of the six Democratic lawmakers, along with Sen. Elissa Slotkin (Mich.) and Reps. Chris Deluzio (Pa.), Maggie Goodlander (N.H.), Chrissy Houlahan (Pa.) and Jason Crow (Colo.), who addressed U.S. troops in a video last week, telling active-duty military and intelligence personnel to defy any illegal orders from the administration, in light of the U.S. military’s ongoing campaign of taking out alleged drug trafficking boats in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific.

Kelly retired from the U.S. Navy with the rank of captain. The senator deployed twice to the Arabian Gulf and has also worked as an instructor at the Naval Pilot School.

Following the joint video, which sparked pushback from their GOP colleagues, President Trump called the group “traitors” and accused them of being guilty of “SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH!” White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said after the post that the president wants the lawmakers to face consequences but does not want to execute members of Congress.

Since then, the Democratic lawmakers who were in the video said they have received “disturbing” threats. Vice President Vance argued over the weekend that the Democratic lawmakers violated the law by telling U.S. troops to disobey illegal orders.

“If the president hasn’t issued illegal orders, then members of Congress telling the military to defy the president is by definition illegal,” Vance said.

The U.S. military has been launching airstrikes on alleged drug-smuggling vessels in waters on both sides of South America, killing at least 83 people whom the administration has called “narco-terrorists.”

Democrats and some Republicans have raised concerns about the ongoing operations, questioning the legality of the strikes. The Justice Department has argued in a classified opinion, which was drafted over the summer, that troops involved in the attacks cannot be held liable for them, which began in early September.

The Defense Department said “military retirees remain subject to the UCMJ for applicable offenses, and federal laws such as 18 U.S.C. § 2387 prohibit actions intended to interfere with the loyalty, morale, or good order and discipline of the armed forces.”

Continue reading.

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

RELATED ARTICLES:

‘SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR’: Trump Demands Arrest of ‘Traitor’ Democrats for Incitement to Insurrection

SHOCK: Minnesota Democrat Judge Overturns Guilty Verdict of Abdi Fatah Yusuf

DEPRAVED: Rhode Island Democrat Running for Mayor Is a CONVICTED CHILD MOLESTER

RELATED VIDEO: Jesse Watters: The ‘Sedition Caucus’ is sinking the USS Democrat ship!

POSTS ON X:

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

DOGE ‘Doesn’t Exist’ with Eight Months Left on Its Charter

By Family Research Council

WASHINGTON (Reuters) — U.S. President Donald Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency has disbanded with eight months left to its mandate, ending an initiative launched with fanfare as a symbol of Trump’s pledge to slash the government’s size but which critics say delivered few measurable savings.

“That doesn’t exist,” Office of Personnel Management Director Scott Kupor told Reuters earlier this month when asked about DOGE’s status.

It is no longer a “centralized entity,” Kupor added, in the first public comments from the Trump administration on the end of DOGE.

The agency, set up in January, made dramatic forays across Washington in the early months of Trump’s second term to rapidly shrink federal agencies, cut their budgets or redirect their work to Trump priorities. The OPM, the federal government’s human resources office, has since taken over many of DOGE’s functions, according to Kupor and documents reviewed by Reuters.

At least two prominent DOGE employees are now involved with the National Design Studio, a new body created through an executive order signed by Trump in August. That body is headed by Joe Gebbia, co-founder of Airbnb, and Trump’s order directed him to beautify government websites.

Gebbia was part of billionaire Elon Musk’s DOGE team while DOGE employee Edward Coristine, nicknamed “Big Balls,” encouraged followers on his X account to apply to join.

The fading away of DOGE is in sharp contrast to the government-wide effort over months to draw attention to it, with Trump, his advisers and cabinet secretaries posting about it on social media. Musk, who led DOGE initially, regularly touted its work on his X platform and at one point brandished a chainsaw to advertise his efforts to cut government jobs.

“This is the chainsaw for bureaucracy,” Musk said, holding the tool above his head at the Conservative Political Action Conference in National Harbor, Maryland, in February.

DOGE claimed to have slashed tens of billions of dollars in expenditures, but it was impossible for outside financial experts to verify that because the unit did not provide detailed public accounting of its work.

“President Trump was given a clear mandate to reduce waste, fraud and abuse across the federal government, and he continues to actively deliver on that commitment,” said White House spokeswoman Liz Huston in an email to Reuters.

TRUMP OFFICIALS HAVE BEEN SIGNALING DOGE’S DEMISE

Trump administration officials have not openly said that DOGE no longer exists, even after Musk’s public feud with Trump in May. Musk has since left Washington.

Trump and his team have nevertheless signaled its demise in public since this summer, even though the U.S. president signed an executive order earlier in his term decreeing that DOGE would last through July 2026.

In statements to reporters, Trump often talks about DOGE in the past tense. Acting DOGE Administrator Amy Gleason, whose background is in healthcare tech, formally became an adviser to Health and Human Services Secretary Robert Kennedy in March, according to a court filing, in addition to her role with DOGE. Her public statements have largely focused on her HHS role.

Republican-led states, including Idaho and Florida, meanwhile are creating local entities similar to DOGE.

A government-wide hiring freeze – another hallmark of DOGE – is also over, Kupor said.

Trump on his first day in office barred federal agencies from bringing on new employees, with exceptions for positions his team deemed necessary to enforce immigration laws and protect public safety. He later said DOGE representatives must approve any other exceptions, adding that agencies should hire “no more than one employee for every four” that depart.

“There is no target around reductions” anymore, Kupor said.

FORMER DOGE EMPLOYEES MOVE ON TO NEW ROLES

DOGE staff have also taken on other roles in the administration. Most prominent is Gebbia, whom Trump tasked with improving the “visual presentation” of government websites.

So far, his design studio has launched websites to recruit law enforcement officers to patrol Washington, D.C., and advertise the president’s drug pricing program. Gebbia declined an interview with Reuters via a spokesperson.

Zachary Terrell, part of the DOGE team given access to government health systems in the early days of Trump’s second term, is now chief technology officer at the Department of Health and Human Services. Rachel Riley, who had the same access according to court filings, is now chief of the Office of Naval Research, according to the office’s website.

Jeremy Lewin, who helped Musk and the Trump administration dismantle the U.S. Agency for International Development, now oversees foreign assistance at the State Department, according to the agency’s website.

Musk shortly after Trump’s election said he had a mandate to “delete the mountain” of government regulations. He made undoing government regulations and remaking the government with AI two key tenets of DOGE, in addition to eliminating federal government jobs.

The administration is still working toward slashing regulations. The White House budget office has tasked Scott Langmack, who was DOGE’s representative at the Department of Housing and Urban Development, with creating custom AI applications to pore through U.S. regulations and determine which ones to eliminate, according to his LinkedIn profile.

Musk, meanwhile, has reappeared in Washington. This week, he attended a White House dinner for Saudi Arabian Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.

(Reporting by Courtney Rozen)

AUTHOR

TWS Staff

RELATED ARTICLE: It Turns Out DOGE Isn’t Dead — Despite The Media Hysteria

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2025 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

Why Letitia James and James Comey Aren’t Out of the Legal Woods

By The Daily Signal

Because Democrat senators have refused to confirm many of President Donald Trump’s preferred picks to serve as U.S. attorneys around the country, his administration has instead been forced to rely on the arcane, convoluted, confusing mechanisms available to temporarily fill those positions.

Given the unprecedented nature of this Democrat obstruction and the conflicting case law in this area, those seeking to avoid criminal charges have, of course, challenged many of these appointments.

And earlier today, a Clinton-appointed South Carolina judge, Cameron McGowan Currie, sitting by special designation in the Eastern District of Virginia, held that Lindsey Halligan had been improperly appointed to serve as the U.S. attorney for that district.

Under the Federal Vacancies Reform Act, the attorney general can appoint an interim U.S. attorney for up to 120 days, after which a successor is typically appointed by the district court until the vacancy is filled by a Senate-confirmed U.S. attorney. In this case, following the resignation of the Biden-appointed U.S. attorney, Erik Siebert was appointed as interim U.S. attorney in that district. On May 9, less than two weeks before the 120-day period lapsed on May 21, the district court appointed Siebert to continue in that role.

In early September, Siebert announced that he was resigning from the position. Following Siebert’s departure, Attorney General Pam Bondi appointed Halligan as the interim U.S. attorney. Shortly thereafter, grand juries returned indictments against New York Attorney General Letitia James and former FBI Director James Comey.

Significantly, Halligan was the only person claiming to represent the government who presented the charges to the grand jury.

Both James and Comey moved to dismiss the indictments that had been returned against them, arguing that Halligan had not been properly appointed at the time she made her grand jury appearances. They argued, and the judge agreed, that the best reading of the statute is that Bondi’s authority to appoint an interim U.S. attorney expired on May 21. The government, of course, disagrees with that interpretation. But the judge rejected the government’s argument that the statute allowed Bondi to make a series of interim appointments, restarting the 120-day clock with each appointment. Because the judge concluded Halligan was essentially a private citizen when she appeared before the grand jury, the indictments that were returned were invalid.

As a result, he dismissed—without prejudice—the indictments she secured against both James and Comey.

Where things go from here becomes somewhat murky—though the cases likely will continue.

Ordinarily, James and Comey could simply be re-indicted because the judge dismissed their cases “without prejudice.” Here, though, James and Comey are both asserting vindictive prosecution and other defenses to their indictments. And Comey, in particular, is asserting a statute-of-limitations defense to his re-indictment.

Essentially, he’s saying that any indictment had to be brought by Sept. 30, 2025, and that because the government brought no valid indictment by that date, the case must be dismissed.

As other commentators have pointed out, however, 18 U.S.C. § 3288 may provide an avenue to re-indict Comey. It provides:

Whenever an indictment or information charging a felony is dismissed for any reason after the period prescribed by the applicable statute of limitations has expired, a new indictment may be returned in the appropriate jurisdiction within six calendar months of the date of the dismissal of the indictment or information, … which new indictment shall not be barred by any statute of limitations.

While this provision does contain exceptions, it’s not clear that any of those would apply.

Moreover, Bondi may be able to validly appoint Halligan to oversee the prosecutions. Bondi can appoint Halligan to serve as the first assistant U.S. attorney (chief deputy) in the Eastern District of Virginia, which in turn means that she would become the “acting” U.S. attorney (instead of the “interim” U.S. attorney) because that office would be vacant. Bondi recently did something similar for the U.S. attorney’s office overseeing Los Angeles.

For its part, the Justice Department has contended that all of this legal wrangling is unnecessary since higher-ranking validly appointed DOJ officials retroactively ratified Halligan’s actions. The Justice Department can appeal this judge’s decisions to dismiss these indictments, or it might simply choose to re-indict James and Comey.

Regardless of which path it chooses, it’s clear that these cases are far from over despite the judge’s ruling dismissing the indictments.

AUTHOR

Zack Smith

Zack Smith is a senior legal fellow and manager of the Supreme Court and Appellate Advocacy Program in The Heritage Foundation’s Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies. Zack on X: @tzsmith.

The 2020 U.S. Stolen Election: Lara Logan and 2 CIA Principles Discuss Chavez, Castro, and Operations within America

By Vlad Tepes Blog

Thanks to Gates of Vienna

A couple of Caveats on this.

The 2020 election saw 12 million voters appear, and then disappear.

We think that the election was most certainly stolen, using all metrics normally applied to any process. But up until now, all efforts to show that the election was stolen using the voting machines appear to have been ops to distract from the actual method by which the election actually was stolen. Likely fake ballots, ballot harvesting, stuffing the machines with faked ballots and all kinds of methods that added up to 12 million non existent voters.

Trump won 2020 with the most votes of any president in history, and somehow Biden got many millions more. Not likely. Then there are the bellwether districts and so on and so on.

So treat this video with cautious and healthy skepticism. It may be true in the final analysis that some software was to blame, or the functioning of some of the machines in some manner. But our information up to now, and much of it published on this site indicates that every effort to determine that it was the machines, including Mike Lindell’s effort in a public conference to expose the code, was a total fail.

RELATED ARTICLE: Cartelville, USA: Documenting the Border Crisis

EDITORS NOTE: This Vlad Tepes Blog column posted by is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Even Far-Left State Department Employees Celebrate Rubio’s Anti-DEI Move

By The Daily Signal

Even self-described far-left State Department employees are happy about Secretary Marco Rubio’s latest move to dismantle diversity, equity, and inclusion, according to an unofficial State Department Reddit page reviewed by The Daily Signal.

“I’m a believer in DEIA and pretty far to the left,” one person who claimed to be a foreign service member wrote on Reddit. “However, the way it was practiced in DoS was completely performative and was actively discriminatory.”

The Daily Signal found the post on a Reddit page for “individuals who work for or aspire to work for the U.S. Foreign Service.” The Reddit is not endorsed or supported in any way by the U.S. State Department.

The posts refer to Rubio offering restitution to State Department employees who the Trump administration found were denied promotions during the Biden administration for not meeting new DEI standards.

Roughly 295 employees who were marked down for not showing they would “seek diversity in staff” will now receive pay increases, administrative promotions, and letters of commendation, Rubio said.

“I heard multiple country teams and hiring panels give preference to based on DEIA categories and had better qualified people lose out,” one post from someone claiming to be a Foreign Service officer says. “For example if the top choice for a position was a white male and the second was a POC, we were told by leadership to go with the POC specifically for DEIA.”

“The scoring for promotion was also crazy,” the post continued. “I had a direct report regularly spewing racist and sexist crap. I went through the EXTREMELY painful process to hold that person accountable. I also terminated a local staff for racist actions and held trainings for my staff on multiculturalism and respectful workplace. I was also a EEO coordinator and dealt with numerous issues there. I got a 3.5. My friend organized a multicultural lunchtime potluck and a GLIFA happy hour (in a country that is extremely open and friendly to LGTBQ+) and got a 4.5. That kind of BS is what gave the right-wing ammo to point at the excesses of DEIA and completely destroy the idea of DEIA in the department.”

Another person posted that he or she was not affected personally but had a co-worker who was passed over due to DEI considerations.

“I was not affected personally by the changes announced yesterday, but I have at least one coworker who claims they would have been promoted in 2024 had they scored higher on the DEIA precept,” the post said.

Another self-proclaimed Foreign Service officer identified himself or herself as “a big supporter of diversity initiatives that are actually implemented correctly.”

“I was recommended but not promoted in 2023. In 2024 I was mid ranked,” the person posted. “In one of those years (can’t recall), when we got the breakdown of scores, all of my scores were above the promotion average, but I had an abysmal DEIA score, despite documenting efforts. I don’t qualify for the administrative action announced unless I happen to be one of the 13 mentioned at the end – I’m guessing those are specifically identified BFFs. But I am very happy for everyone who is getting promoted after throwing out the ludicrous DEIA score. It is well deserved.”

A State Department political appointee told The Daily Signal they were “glad to see that employees from both the left and the right saw how crazy the DEI policies were at the State Department.”

This article was first published Nov. 22 in The Daily Signal.

AUTHOR

Elizabeth Troutman Mitchell

Elizabeth Troutman Mitchell is the White House Correspondent for “The Daily Signal.” Send her an email. Elizabeth on X: @TheElizMitchell.