VIDEO EXPOZÈ:  How To ‘Change Votes Without A Trace’ on Dominion Machines thumbnail

VIDEO EXPOZÈ: How To ‘Change Votes Without A Trace’ on Dominion Machines

By Dr. Rich Swier

‘At Least 40’ Undercover Informants Were Doing Surveillance On Jan. 6, Defense Lawyer Says thumbnail

‘At Least 40’ Undercover Informants Were Doing Surveillance On Jan. 6, Defense Lawyer Says

By The Daily Caller

Law enforcement agencies had at least 40 undercover informants engaging in surveillance work among defendants on Jan. 6, defendant Dominic Pezzola’s lawyer Roger Roots said Wednesday.

A Proud Boys member, Pezzola is currently standing federal trial in Washington, D.C. with the group’s former national chairman Enrique Tarrio and members Ethan Nordean, Joseph Biggs, Zachary Rehl for allegedly conspiring to oppose the Jan. 2021 transfer of presidential power and related charges. The government admitted Tuesday that eight FBI confidential human sources were embedded among the Proud Boys on Jan. 6, Roots reported in a Wednesday court filing, saying the Homeland Security Investigations (HIS) agency appears to have had some 19 informants active at the time.

At least 13 undercover plain-clothes DC Metro Police (MPD) agents worked among Jan. 6 defendants that day, Roots said. He reported that federal prosecutors revealed information involving twelve of the officers on Friday.

“Some of these undercover Metro officers marched with the Proud Boy march,” Roots said. “And some appear to have played roles of instigators, in that they are seen on body-worn videos chanting ‘Go! Go!,’ ‘Stop the Steal!,’ and ‘Whose house? Our house!’ on Jan. 6. Others generally followed demonstrators toward the Capitol.”

Dominic Pezzola by Daily Caller News Foundation on Scribd

“When added to the 8 FBI CHSs now acknowledged by the prosecutors, this means that there were at least 40 undercover informants or agents doing surveillance among defendants on January 6,” he concluded.

Roots asked the court to make the government “reveal all informants, undercover operatives and other confidential human sources relating to the events of January 6,” arguing that the HIS informants and their likely conduct could “almost certainly” help exonerate Pezzola. He said the defense would have been “much more aggressive” in the trial originally if they knew “the scope and scale” of Jan. 6 undercover government operations.

Roots had motioned Friday for permission to issue a subpoena for Jan. 6 rioter Ray Epps, who has been accused of being an FBI informant, though Epps and others have vehemently denied this. The attorney argued Epps “is being suspiciously protected from prosecution by the government,” and the Friday motion referenced Jan. 6 defendant William Pope‘s claims that undercover MPD officers were instigating the Jan. 6 crowd from within to storm the Capitol.

The government revealed to the defense on March 22 that a woman that Tarrio’s defense intended to call as a witness had been an FBI confidential human source from April 2021 to January 2023. Judge Timothy Kelly Kelly ruled March 27 that defense lawyers could not raise the woman’s FBI relationship in the trial, and Tarrio’s attorney Sabino Jauregui subsequently said he would not call her to testify, according to Lawfare’s Robert Parloff.

AUTHOR

TREVOR SCHAKOHL

Legal reporter.

RELATED ARTICLE: ‘Lash Out’: Peter Strzok Says GOP Criticism Of FBI Provokes ‘Violence’ Against Gov’t

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

Experts: Trump Indictment Highlights ‘Disturbing’ Double Standard of Justice thumbnail

Experts: Trump Indictment Highlights ‘Disturbing’ Double Standard of Justice

By Family Research Council

Former president Donald Trump was indicted Tuesday on 34 felony counts by a Manhattan-based grand jury, in what Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton on “Washington Watch” called an “unprecedented indictment” of a former president. “The two-tiered system of law that is unfolding here is disturbing and just outright wrong,” said former Congressman Jody Hice, who now serves as FRC’s senior advisor to the president, on “Washington Watch.”

Representative Bob Good (R-Va.) on “Washington Watch” said the “conviction in search of a crime” is a plain attempt to prosecute a political opponent, “like we’re a third world country, or a banana republic, or a communist totalitarian state.” Good pointed out that Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg campaigned by “saying he was going to go after President Trump … bragging about how many times he’d filed suit against President Trump before he ran for office. And now he’s trying to make good on that and deliver to his radical left base.”

“They went after this president for some seven, eight years now. And this is what they’ve come up with, a false business charge?” demanded Good.

Professor Phill Kline, who was formerly the attorney general of Kansas, agreed. “This [case] is not being brought because Mr. Trump is a big threat on the loose to America, even though these charges force him to face life in prison. … He’s being charged because the DA doesn’t like him.”

“They’ve turned this president every which way but loose,” said FRC president and “Washington Watch” host Tony Perkins. “Fifty congressional investigations, impeached twice by a Democrat-led House,” he recounted. “Of course, nothing stuck to him because, at the end of the day, there was nothing there.”

This opinion is not exclusively held by those immersed in the details; the crowd outside the Manhattan courthouse reportedly held the same view. Reporter Jarrett Stepman, who was present in Manhattan when the indictment was unsealed, said the sense “from the crowd, even before this came down,” was that the Trump indictment “was essentially a political charge … because of his governing philosophy, because of who he was.”

“This standard [that] is being held to now former President Donald Trump,” Stepman added, “wouldn’t be held to other people.” Days after taking office, Bragg announced he would not prosecute marijuana misdemeanors, public transportation fare evasion, most trespassing charges, unpaid traffic fines, “any violation, traffic infraction, or other non-criminal offense,” resisting arrest, obstructing governmental administration, prostitution, and outdated offenses.

“To be clear, President Trump’s immoral behavior of the past really set in motion these wheels of political attacks that have been churning for years now,” said Perkins.

But, Perkins added, “if [Trump] would have governed the way he is alleged to have lived prior to being president, we wouldn’t be having this discussion, because the Left would have loved him. But he governed as a conservative, and he put people around him unlike any other Republican president in modern history, who actually advanced a conservative agenda.” Perkins said the Left has made him a target because “he represents a movement.”

“Unfortunately, we have seen increasing weaponization of government against political enemies,” Kline agreed. “You see that with the Department of Justice now and how they’re treating different potential investigative targets based on really their political opinions and positions that they have taken. So, we are creating a two-tiered system of justice in this country.”

“It’s also about scaring folks like you, and me … and every average day Americans and activists who are conservative, Republican, or frankly, dissident liberals,” added Fitton. Last week, IRS agents visited the home of Matt Taibbi, one of the liberal journalists reporting on the Twitter files, while Taibbi was testifying before the House Committee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government. “They must fear — rightly so — their personal liberties [are] at stake or at risk as a result of this authoritarian, this totalitarian instinct among the Left to use the powers of prosecutors, all government bodies to try to jail their opponents.”

Hice said that the injustice of this situation should bother Christians, even if Trump’s immoral lifestyle offends them. “God loves those who stand for justice,” he said, “and this is a time where the two-tiered system … is becoming so blatantly obvious to every American citizen.”

“It doesn’t matter your points of view on whatever it is, the law should be applied to everyone,” Hice continued. “Where crimes have been committed, then there should be consequences. But where there is the strong arm of government simply going after political opponents, that is injustice.”

Perkins agreed. “We addressed this when this [scandal] came up, when the president was running for office back in 2016. This does not measure up to the standard by which we like to see as Christians in this country. In fact, I was not an early, early supporter of the president for these very reasons.” But now, he added, former president Trump is being made “a target because of his policies and the way he governed.”

“All of us have fallen and come short of the glory of God,” said Hice, and “every single one of us one day will stand before God, and we’ll give an account of our lives.”

“We understand the love and the grace of God to reach out and forgive us and transform us through giving his Son,” Hice continued, “so let’s keep that hope in mind. … And at the end of the day, God will have the final word over each of our lives. But until then, we are here in a world trying to stand for justice.”

“I can’t vouch for everything the president did,” Perkins said. But now that a man who “took the heat in advancing policies that we advocated for” is under attack, Perkins said he feels an obligation to defend “the rule of law and the fact that there is a disparity here in the justice that he is being denied.”

“I think we need to be passionate. We need to be engaged,” said Perkins. “But I do think we’ve got to be very careful that we do not breach this line of inciting and calling for political violence against our political opponents. I think that’s where we completely lose it as a country.”

Fitton echoed the same concern that the indictment of a former president and current presidential candidate will erode America’s bedrock institution. “This is a rigged prosecution for a rigged election,” he said. It “not only is designed to thwart the exercise of President Trump’s First Amendment rights, but to thwart our right to govern ourselves.”

“Bragg isn’t running the country, and we have to remind him of that. Congress should remind him of that,” said Fitton. He urged Congress to “figure out how much U.S taxpayer money at the federal level is being used by Bragg and anyone else” in New York City and “defund New York to the extent practical. If New York and the justice system up in New York wants to undermine our republic … taxpayers should have nothing to do with it at the federal level.”

“This isn’t ordinary, in terms of our nation’s history,” Fitton warned, to “have an entire movement who’s rejecting the American way, the protection of law, equal protection of the law, respect for election systems, and elections generally. … We don’t use criminal law to just go after our political opponents just because they’re our political opponents.”

AUTHOR

Joshua Arnold

Joshua Arnold is a staff writer at The Washington Stand.

RELATED ARTICLES:

‘Thin Gruel’: Legal Experts Unimpressed by 34-Count Trump Indictment

Trump indictment shows that power-crazed Democrats are INCOMPATIBLE with human society – NaturalNews.com

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2023 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

Not Just Nashville: Attacks Against Churches Nearly Tripled in 2023, Report Finds thumbnail

Not Just Nashville: Attacks Against Churches Nearly Tripled in 2023, Report Finds

By Family Research Council

Last week’s mass murder of six people at a church-run Christian school constitutes 2023’s deadliest act of violence against churches, which have increased nearly three times this year compared to last year, a new report from Family Research Council finds. The number of anti-church attacks in 2022 had already tripled over four years, a previous report found.

In all, assailants attacked churches 69 times in the first three months of 2023, compared with 24 such acts during the same period last year, a 288% increase. The rising tempo of anti-Christian assaults — which includes arsons, bomb threats, vandalism, and sacrilege — has affected places of worship in 29 states. The motives behind such desecration run the gamut from pro-abortion activism or controversies over transgender ideology to apparently senseless acts of destruction.

“American churches are increasingly bearing the brunt of anger and aggression, whether that’s from political or other motivations,” the report’s author — Arielle Del Turco, assistant director of the Center for Religious Liberty at Family Research Council — told The Washington Stand. “This contributes to an environment of hostility toward Christianity.”

The acts of anti-church aggression documented between January and March of this year includes:

  • 53 incidents of vandalism;
  • 10 suspicious fires;
  • Three gun-related incidents; and
  • Three bomb threats — including a pipe bomb recovered outside Philadelphia’s 127-year-old St. Dominic Catholic Church.

“If this rate continues, 2023 will have the highest number of incidents of the six years FRC has tracked,” the report notes. The number of church attacks in 2023 already exceeds “the entirety of 2018, in which we identified only 50 incidents, or 2020, in which we identified 54.”

The month of January 2023 had more church attacks than any single month in the five years FRC has kept records, with 43 such events, according to data furnished to TWS. “This steep increase is a cause for concern,” says the update.

Hostility toward Christian views of hot-button political issues have exploded into violence and vandalism numerous times this year. In January, abortion activists spray painted the words “Women’s Body, Women’s Choice” over a pro-life banner hanging outside St. Stephen Catholic Church in Riverview, Florida.

Last month, transgender activists lashed out at Kentucky legislators who voted against their agenda by defacing an historic church. Vandals spray painted the words “TRANS PWR” on St. Joseph Catholic Church in Louisville, Kentucky, on March 3 — “the day after the Kentucky House of Representatives passed a bill that would protect children from harmful gender-transition procedures,” the report states. Undeterred state legislators enacted the child safety protections over Democratic Governor Andy Beshear’s veto later that month.

Individuals who identify as transgender have focused their rage on Christian facilities as well. In addition to 28-year-old Audrey Hale’s attack on The Covenant School in Nashville, a 27-year-old man who identifies as a woman set the 117-year-old Portland Korean Church building ablaze on January 3. The suspect, whose legal name is Cameron Storer, claimed to hear voices that “threatened to ‘mutilate’ Storer if Storer refused to burn the church down,” the new FRC report states.

Nashville police have yet to release Hale’s “manifesto,” purportedly due to an “ongoing investigation,” but officers have said Hale’s views of the transgender issue may have touched off her violent rampage. Storer apparently suffers from mental illness, which afflicts those who identify as LGBTQ at far higher rates than average, according to the Biden administration.

Sometimes, the same perpetrator strikes multiple times. Police say 40-year-old Peter Sirolli vandalized three Roman Catholic churches in New Jersey on the same morning, including burning a 10-foot-tall cross on the lawn of St. Patrick’s Catholic Church in Woodbury on January 13.

The new FRC update builds on an 84-page report released last December. In the original study, FRC verified 420 acts of hostility against houses of worship between January 2018 and September 2022. The new addition brings the full number of anti-Christian incidents in 2022 up to date. In the original report, FRC calculated 137 intentionally damaging incidents against churches had taken place through last September. The last three months of 2022 brought an additional 54 such acts, bringing the total number of assaults against churches to 191 in 2022.

In all, researchers documented a total of 543 attacks on 517 separate churches between January 2018 and March 2023. Of the 517 separate churches attacked, 26 of the churches were victimized more than once, with three being targeted three times each, according to data furnished to The Washington Stand.

Between 2018 and 2023, American churches have suffered:

  • 442 acts of vandalism;
  • 71 cases of arson;
  • 15 gun-related incidents;
  • 14 bomb threats; and
  • 25 miscellaneous acts of aggression against church facilities

A total of 25 incidents fell into multiple categories, according to FRC researchers.

The worst period of sustained assaults during those 39 months broke out last summer over the unprecedented, and heretofore unsolved, leak of the Supreme Court’s Dobbs ruling last May. After the media reported the Supreme Court would overturn Roe v. Wade and return the issue of abortion to democratic control, pro-abortion activists committed 86 attacks against Christian churches last May (24), June (28), and July (34).

Churches also sustained damage from the “Black Lives Matter” riots, which broke out in the summer of 2020 over the killing of George Floyd. BLM rioters committed 11 acts of church desecration, researchers told TWS.

Despite the quickening pulse of anti-Christian crimes, some of which have been investigated as “hate crimes,” conservatives say the Biden administration has been too lax in its response. In January, the Republican-controlled House of Representatives passed H. Con. Res. 3, which noted that abortion extremists such as Jane’s Revenge had “defaced, vandalized, and caused destruction to over 100 pro-life facilities, groups, and churches” in 2022, yet “the Biden Administration has failed to take action to respond to the radical attacks on pro-life facilities, groups, and churches, or to protect the rights of these organizations.”

The Democrat-controlled Senate has taken no action on the bill.

“American leaders and citizens alike should condemn acts of hostility against churches and affirm the right for all people to attend their houses of worship without feeling targeted or threatened,” Del Turco told TWS.

AUTHOR

Ben Johnson

Ben Johnson is senior reporter and editor at The Washington Stand.

RELATED ARTICLE: Loudoun County Bans Teacher from Adding Bible Verse in Email Signature

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2023 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

Judicial Watch Statement on Trump Indictment thumbnail

Judicial Watch Statement on Trump Indictment

By Judicial Watch

Washington, D.C. – Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton made the following statement regarding the unprecedented indictment of President Donald Trump by Democrats in New York:

What a sad day for America. And what a blow to the rule of law and our republican form of government. Today, President Trump and the American people were abused and victimized by New York Democrat politician Alvin Bragg, who abused his office to try to jail a man he must know to be innocent. This is an indictment about nothing based on non-crimes and politics. It is a rigged prosecution to rig an election. The courts must end this malicious prosecution before the nation is irreparably damaged. In the meantime, Congress must immediately investigate Bragg’s election interference and his political attack on Trump’s civil rights. Judicial Watch has already launched a series of Freedom of Information Act inquiries into this unprecedented attack on the American way.

RELATED VIDEO: FITTON: “This is a Rigged Prosecution to Ensure a Rigged Election!”

EDITORS NOTE: This Judicial Watch statement is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Trump, ‘The only crime I committed is to fearlessly defend our nation from those who seek to destroy it.’ thumbnail

Trump, ‘The only crime I committed is to fearlessly defend our nation from those who seek to destroy it.’

By Dr. Rich Swier

The Volusia County Florida GOP published the following in an email titled, “The only crime I committed is to fearless defend our nation from those who seek to destroy it.

President Donald Trump returned to Mar a Lago last night, where he addressed hundreds of his loyal supporters about the shameless sham of an indictment handed up by Soros-backed Manhattan DA’s grand jury.

WATCH: 45th President of the United States Donald J. Trump Delivers Remarks at Mar-a-Lago. Note: President Trump’s remarks begin at the 23:00 minute mark.

Let us state this clearly. This indictment will not survive legal scrutiny. 

District Attorney Bragg has cobbled together a patch quilt of absurd legal theory, woven from a tissue of lies from disgraced disbarred attorney and convicted perjurer Michael Cohen.

The 34 counts fail to detail ANY evidence of felony crimes.  DA Bragg refused to cite any specific evidence that would tie Donald Trump to illegal behavior.

The alleged offenses are said to have occurred AFTER Trump was President, so how can Bragg claim any of the payments were tied to his campaign?  More of the absurdity of this case is outlined here:

In one fell swoop, the clueless and corrupt Manhattan DA has plunged America and its once revered principles of equal justice and presumption of innocence into banana republic-style depravity.

This is clearly a clumsy legal Hail Mary aimed at keeping our 45th President from becoming our 47th.  It won’t work because WE THE PEOPLE won’t let them get away with it.

Countless small donors have already sent more than $10 million to the Trump campaign since word of the indictment leaked out.

George Washington University Professor Jonathan Turley, a renowned constitutional scholar and liberal Democrat has denounced the indictment as a “legal Slurpee.”  Read more here “Why Turley Is Comparing the Trump Indictment to a ‘Legal Slurpee’

©2023 Volusia GOP. All rights reserved.

RELATED VIDEO:

RELATED ARTICLES:

WAYNE ROOT: No, Trump Isn’t Jesus Christ, but Democrats Sure are Persecuting Him like Jesus. Here’s Why.

Could Trump Prosecutor Alvin Bragg Go to Prison? It’s Possible

REVEALED: Committed Leftist Judge Juan Merchan Who Oversees Trump’s Sham Case in NYC Court Made Political Contributions to “Stop The Republicans” and “Biden For President”

NYT Reporter Hammers KJP On Why Biden Won’t Speak About Trump Indictment

‘Radical, Corrupted, Governments’: Marjorie Taylor Greene Compares Trump Arrest To Mandela, Jesus

Manhattan DA Bragg’s Office Hands Alleged Repeat Felon A Slap On The Wrist Amid Trump Prosecution: REPORT

Trump Attorney Tells Tucker Carlson DA Bragg Charged Trump With A Crime That ‘Doesn’t Exist’

Manhattan Prosecutor ‘Overcharged’ Trump, ‘Weak’ Case Could Backfire: Legal Analysts

Prosecute Alvin Bragg

RELATED TWEET:

Keep Fighting, Mr. President. pic.twitter.com/7skbWUFQdb

— MAGA War Room (@MAGAIncWarRoom) March 30, 2023

Analysis of the Trump Indictment thumbnail

Analysis of the Trump Indictment

By The Geller Report

It’s worse than we thought. It’s a mockery of the judicial system. There’s no there there. 

Analysis of the Trump Indictment

Curious Omissions from the Manhattan DA

By: Techno Fog, April 4

After nearly 8 years of investigations by federal and state authorities – spanning from Russian collusion to obstruction of justice to campaign finance violations to tax fraud – former president Donald Trump was indicted last week by the Manhattan District Attorney, Alvin Bragg.

And today we saw the next step in the unprecedented prosecution of a former president and current GOP presidential candidate: Trump turned himself in at the Manhattan DA’s office.

Trump arrived at approximately 1:30 p.m. for arraignment with thousands of supporters and demonstrators watching from the streets and millions watching from home or from work. It was the most most important courthouse appearance in recent memory to answer for one of the weakest indictments in New York history.

As has been reported, Trump was formally charged with 34 felonies – more on those below – and pleaded not guilty.

Here is the indictment that was just released this afternoon.

And here is the statement of facts.

Trump faces 34 counts relating to “Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree, in violation of Penal Law § 175.10.” These charges relate to to bookkeeping records concerning a hush money payment of $130,000 to Stormy Daniels soon before the 2016 election; a $30,000 payment to a former Trump Tower doorman by AMI (National Enquirer); and an AMI/National Enquirer payment of $150,000 to a woman who said she had a sexual relationship with Trump when he was married.

The indictment specifies that Trump “made and caused false” entries in the business records of enterprises “kept and maintained by the Trump Organization.” Trump is said to have done this with the “intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission” of that crime. (Intent to defraud is construed broadly in New York, and can include acts that seek to avoid responsibility for a violation of law or to conceal offenses; there need not be financial harm.1)

Here’s an example relating to an invoice from Michael Cohen (Count 1): Click here to read Count 1.

That verbiage is repeated all throughout the 16 page indictment, with differences concerning the dates and the type of record (invoice, ledger, check, etc.) that was allegedly falsified, all in violation of NY Penal Law § 175.10.

Before we get to the law itself, and the Manhattan DA’s dubious, dangerous, unheard-of application of the law, let’s begin with a basic observation: Trump was overcharged. Here’s why. …

Keep reading.

There’s a curious omission in the Donald Trump indictment and statement of facts –

The specific federal law Trump violated. pic.twitter.com/bsM32x4jhn

— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) April 4, 2023

Couple of easy points: 1. The statute of limitations is violated, which may get this case tossed in its face. 2. The second crime, which is required to raise this misdemeanor to a felony, doesn’t apply under these circumstances and isn’t even fully explained. This is very sloppy…

Bragg and the NY Democrats are requesting a trial in January of 2024, right in the middle of the Republican primaries.

Alvin Bragg’s unsealed indictment is an indictment of Alvin Bragg. Legitimate law schools will forever use this indictment to teach the concept of prosecutorial abuse of discretion. All Americans, regardless of political persuasions, should condemn this indictment as the travesty… https://t.co/UQshdUftsr

— John Ratcliffe (@JohnRatcliffe) April 4, 2023

I’ve read the entire indictment. This case is a total joke, will get tossed on legal appeal. This is an absolute gift to the Trump campaign. It’s as if Alvin Bragg is trying to get Trump elected. Complete embarrassment to New York City and its citizens.

— Clay Travis (@ClayTravis) April 4, 2023

I’ve read the entire indictment. This case is a total joke, will get tossed on legal appeal. This is an absolute gift to the Trump campaign. It’s as if Alvin Bragg is trying to get Trump elected. Complete embarrassment to New York City and its citizens.

— Clay Travis (@ClayTravis) April 4, 2023

The next hearing in New York vs Trump isn’t until December 4th. Many motions will be filed between now and then. Prosecution wants the trial to be in January of 2024, right in the middle of the 2024 primaries. These charges are complete garbage, FYI. That I believe will…

— Clay Travis (@ClayTravis) April 4, 2023

Here’s the full Trump indictment list

I’m seeing a very alarming pattern – every single “crime” was committed after President Trump was sworn into office

He wasn’t running his business – he was running the country!

So who actually did all this?!https://t.co/h1jirlCHlp

— DC_Draino (@DC_Draino) April 4, 2023

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

RELATED ARTICLES:

E PLURIBUS TRUMP

As Trump Goes to Court For Paying Off Stormy Daniels, Another Court Awards Him $121,962 From Stormy Daniels

Daughter of Judge Overseeing Trump’s Case Worked For ‘Kamala Harris Campaign’, Now Serves As President of Company that Has Biden-Harris Campaign As Client

Soros DA Bragg Tells Judge To Gag Donald Trump, Leading GOP Candidate

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Trump Pleads ‘Not Guilty’ To 34 Charges thumbnail

Trump Pleads ‘Not Guilty’ To 34 Charges

By The Daily Caller

Former President Donald Trump pleaded not guilty to 34 counts on Tuesday, according to reports.

Trump entered a Manhattan courthouse on Tuesday afternoon, was fingerprinted, and then was informed of the charges against him. 

This is the first time in American history that a current or former president is facing criminal charges.

Trump’s appearance inside the courtroom was not allowed to be televised.

The former president flew from Florida to New York on Monday and spent the night in Trump Tower. He is expected to fly to Mar-a-Lago to deliver a speech Tuesday night.

Trump was indicted on Thursday by the New York-based grand jury, on allegations relating to his lawyer Michael Cohen paying hush money to porn star Stormy Daniels before the 2016 election. The indictment was sealed, but CNN reported that he would be facing more than 30 counts related to business fraud and the payment, citing two sources familiar with the case.

Trump has maintained that he never had an affair with Daniels, who claims that they had intimate relations starting in 2006.

This is a breaking story and will be updated as more information becomes available.

AUTHOR

DIANA GLEBOVA

White House correspondent.

VIDEO COMMENTARY: Trump’s Arraignment: The Police State Is HereThe Dan Bongino Show

RELATED TWEET:

BREAKING

President Trump has just plead “Not Guilty.”

Because he is INNOCENT. pic.twitter.com/uBzaNzZddu

— Sebastian Gorka DrG (@SebGorka) April 4, 2023

RELATED VIDEO: Pro Trump Rally in West Palm Beach, Florida.

RELATED ARTICLES:

‘America Was Not Supposed To Be This Way!’: Trump Confirms NYC Court Date

Russian Columnist Akopov: The Indictment Of Donald Trump Is A Desperate Move By The Washington Establishment To Bar Trump’s Return To The White House

NYPD Officers Call Out Sick To Avoid Arresting President Trump

Manhattan in Chaos Ahead of Trump Arraignment

Could Trump Prosecutor Alvin Bragg Go to Prison? It’s Possible

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

FDR’s Other ‘Day of Infamy’: When the U.S. Government Seized All Citizens’ Gold thumbnail

FDR’s Other ‘Day of Infamy’: When the U.S. Government Seized All Citizens’ Gold

By Foundation for Economic Education (FEE)

Ninety years ago, Franklin Roosevelt told Americans they had less than a month to hand over their gold or face up to ten years in prison.


December 7, 1941 will forever be remembered as, in the words of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, “a date that will live in infamy.” Another infamous date is April 5, 1933—the day that FDR ordered the seizure of the private gold holdings of the American people. By attacking innocent citizens, he bombed the country’s gold standard just as surely as Japan bombed Pearl Harbor.

On this 90th anniversary of the seizure, it behooves us to recall the details of it, for multiple reasons: It ranks as one of the most notorious abuses of power in a decade when there were almost too many to count. It’s an example of bad policy imposed on the guiltless by the government that created the conditions it used to justify it. And the very fact of compliance, however minimal, is a scary testimony to how fragile freedom is in the middle of a crisis.

Suddenly on April 5, 1933, FDR told Americans—in the form of Executive Order 6102—that they had less than a month to hand over their gold coins, bullion and gold certificates or face up to ten years in prison or a fine of $10,000, or both. After May 1, private ownership and possession of these things would be as illegal as Demon Rum. After Prohibition was repealed later the same year, the sober man with gold in his pocket was the criminal while the staggering drunk was no more than a nuisance.

Hoarding gold was preventing recovery from the Great Depression, FDR declared. Government (which caused the Depression in the first place) had no choice, if you can follow the logic, but to seize the gold and do the hoarding itself. But of course, the big difference was this: In the hands of the government, huge new gold supplies could be used by the Federal Reserve as the basis for expanding the paper money supply. The President who had promised a 25 percent reduction in federal spending during his 1932 campaign, could now double spending in his first term.

What evidence suggested Americans were “hoarding” gold? Roosevelt pointed to a run on banks that immediately preceded his April 5 seizure decree. Indeed, people were showing up at tellers’ windows with paper dollars demanding the gold that the paper notes promised. But Roosevelt had prompted the bank run himself!

On March 8, three days after succeeding Herbert Hoover as the new President, FDR declared the gold standard to be safe. After all, America’s gold reserves were the largest in the world. Then out of the blue, on March 11, the President issued an executive order preventing banks from making gold payments. The message was clear: In spite of its campaign pledge to protect the integrity of the currency, this was an administration intent on spending and printing like none before. Citizens who wanted to protect their savings and financial assets suddenly had every good reason to find and keep whatever gold they could get their hands on. James Bovard writes in “The Great Gold Robbery,”

Roosevelt was hailed as a visionary and a savior for his repudiation of the government’s gold commitment. Citizens who distrusted the government’s currency management or integrity were branded as social enemies, and their gold was seized. And for what? So that the government could betray its promises and capture all the profit itself from the devaluation it planned. Shortly after Roosevelt banned private ownership of gold, he announced a devaluation of 59 percent in the gold value of the dollar. In other words, after Roosevelt seized the citizenry’s gold, he proclaimed that the gold would henceforth be of much greater value in dollar terms.

Dentists, jewelers, and industrial users were allowed to acquire gold to meet their “reasonable needs.” If you had a gold tooth, the government did not yank it out. But if you possessed more than $100 in monetary gold (coin or notes denominated in the yellow metal) after May 1, 1933, you were a villainous lawbreaker until private gold ownership was legalized four decades later.

With the passage of the Thomas Amendment to an agricultural bill on May 12, 1933, vast new presidential powers over money were affirmed by Congress. But even some of FDR’s own party still had a conscience. Democratic Senator Carter Glass of Virginia solemnly and honestly lamented,

It’s dishonor, sir. This great government, strong in gold, is breaking its promises to pay gold to widows and orphans to whom it has sold government bonds with a pledge to pay gold coin of the present standard of value. It is breaking its promise to redeem its paper money in gold coin of the present standard of value. It’s dishonor, sir.

When FDR followed up in June by abrogating the gold clauses in both private and government contracts, he asked blind Oklahoma Senator Thomas Gore, a fellow Democrat, for his opinion. Gore had lost his eyesight at the age of 12 but he saw right through FDR on this matter. He famously replied, “Why that’s just plain stealing, isn’t it, Mr. President?”

In his book, Economics and the Public Welfare, A Financial and Economic History of the United States, 1914-1946, the great economist Benjamin Anderson recalled Senator Gore’s words on the Senate floor:

Henry VIII approached total depravity, as nearly as the imperfections of human nature would allow. But the vilest thing that Henry ever did was to debase the coin of the realm. [See: “How Henry VIII Debauched English Money to Feed His Lavish Lifestyle.”

Many Americans were cowed by government threats to do the “patriotic” thing and turn in their gold as Roosevelt mandated. But true to the rugged individualism and defiance of tyranny ingrained in our culture, FDR’s order prompted widespread noncompliance. Best estimates, corroborated in this short video and elsewhere, suggest that for every one dollar in gold that Americans relinquished, they quietly kept three.

If the federal government tried today to seize the gold holdings of private American citizens, how much do you think we would turn over?

Call me a scofflaw if you want, but it would NOT get its hands on mine.

For Additional Information, See:

Great Myths of the Great Depression by Lawrence W. Reed

Media Still Peddling One of the Great Myths of the Depression by Lawrence W. Reed

The Great Gold Robbery by James Bovard

James U. Blanchard: Champion of Liberty and Sound Money by Lawrence W. Reed

FDR Campaigned on Fiscal Restraint in 1932. He Delivered Just the Opposite by Lawrence W. Reed

The Great Crash and Depression: 90 Years Later by Lawrence W. Reed

The Great Gold Robbery of 1933 by Thomas Woods

AUTHOR

Lawrence W. Reed

Lawrence W. Reed is FEE’s President Emeritus, Humphreys Family Senior Fellow, and Ron Manners Global Ambassador for Liberty, having served for nearly 11 years as FEE’s president (2008-2019). He is author of the 2020 book, Was Jesus a Socialist? as well as Real Heroes: Incredible True Stories of Courage, Character, and Conviction and Excuse Me, Professor: Challenging the Myths of Progressivism. Follow on LinkedIn and Like his public figure page on Facebook. His website is www.lawrencewreed.com.

EDITORS NOTE: This FEE column  is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Trump Surrenders At New York Courthouse thumbnail

Trump Surrenders At New York Courthouse

By The Daily Caller

Former President Donald Trump arrived at a Manhattan courtroom Tuesday where he will hear the charges against him.

Trump has said he will plead “not guilty” to charges stemming from to an alleged hush money payment to pornographic actress Stormy Daniels before the 2016 election. Trump attorney Michael Cohen allegedly paid Daniels $130,000 to keep her from claiming publicly that she had an affair with Trump in 2006, and the case hinges on whether Trump broke the law by reimbursing Cohen for the payment. Trump has maintained that he never had an affair with Daniels.

This will mark the first time in history a former president has been arraigned for a crime, and Trump faces more than 30 counts related to business fraud, CNN reported.

Trump flew from Florida to New York on Monday, and said he would voluntarily turn himself in to the courthouse in Manhattan on Tuesday. He will likely have his fingerprints taken, but a perp walk, handcuffs and a mugshot are unlikely, The New York Times reported, citing people with knowledge of the matter.

Trump is then expected to fly to Mar-a-Lago to give a speech Tuesday night.

Protesters gathered across the street from the courthouse in the hours leading up to Trump’s arrival, including Republican Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia and George Santos of New York.

Trump reacted to his indictment on Thursday, calling it “Political Persecution and Election Interference at the highest level in history.”

On Monday, Trump claimed that Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg leaked information to the press about his indictment, and called for him to “indict himself.”

“Wow! District Attorney Bragg just illegally LEAKED the various points, and complete information, on the pathetic Indictment against me,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. “I know the reporter and so, unfortunately, does he. This means that he MUST BE IMMEDIATELY INDICTED. Now, if he wants to really clean up his reputation, he will do the honorable thing and, as District Attorney, INDICT HIMSELF. He will go down in Judicial history, and his Trump Hating wife will be, I am sure, very proud of him!”

The former president did not provide evidence to substantiate his claim that Bragg leaked information about the sealed indictment to the press.

AUTHOR

DIANA GLEBOVA

White House correspondent.

RELATED VIDEO: Pro Trump Rally in West Palm Beach, Florida.

RELATED TWEET:

BREAKING: MASSIVE banner displayed in front of Manhattan Courthouse reading “Trump Lies All the Time” prompts a fight between those gathered in front #TrumpIndictment pic.twitter.com/bcX9IG3Qsp

— Meech Memez (@MeechMemez) April 4, 2023

RELATED ARTICLES:

‘America Was Not Supposed To Be This Way!’: Trump Confirms NYC Court Date

Russian Columnist Akopov: The Indictment Of Donald Trump Is A Desperate Move By The Washington Establishment To Bar Trump’s Return To The White House

NYPD Officers Call Out Sick To Avoid Arresting President Trump

Manhattan in Chaos Ahead of Trump Arraignment

Could Trump Prosecutor Alvin Bragg Go to Prison? It’s Possible

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

President Trump on ‘Corrupt’ Bragg: ‘America was not supposed to be this way!’ [Video] thumbnail

President Trump on ‘Corrupt’ Bragg: ‘America was not supposed to be this way!’ [Video]

By The Geller Report

UPDATE:

JUST IN – DA Alvin Bragg reportedly having second thoughts on todays arrest. His staffers are saying he knows he’s going down for prosecutorial misconduct and will face consequences afterward.

— The Trump Train 🚂🇺🇸 (@The_Trump_Train) April 4, 2023


Donald Trump’s lawyer said the former president will not be put on handcuffs when he is formally charged in New York and will not accept any plea after an unprecedented indictment by a Manhattan grand jury Thursday.

BREAKING: President Trump has recorded a video for his supporters like YOU, responding to the indictment. Not even the fake news has seen this.

Please make a contribution to SAVE OUR COUNTRY – for 1,500% impact:https://t.co/nOTPwmH2KZ pic.twitter.com/GqgejsCEhB

— Team Trump (Text TRUMP to 88022) (@TeamTrump) April 2, 2023

Trump goes off on ‘corrupt’ Bragg as he confirms NYC court appearance after indictment: ‘America was not supposed to be this way!’

By Lee Brown, NY Post, April 3, 2023:

Former President Donald Trump confirmed he will fly to New York on Monday, one day ahead of his unprecedented criminal arraignment — as the NYPD is already setting up a huge ring of steel ahead of protests.

“I will be leaving Mar-a-Lago on Monday at 12 noon, heading to Trump Tower in New York,” Trump, 76, confirmed on Truth Social late Sunday of his flight from his Florida resort to his Fifth Ave. pad.

“On Tuesday morning I will be going to, believe it or not, the Courthouse. America was not supposed to be this way!” he complained.

The ex-president — who is running again for 2024 — detailed his travel plans just 15 minutes after again attacking Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg for the charges over the $130,000 hush-money payments to porn star Stormy Daniels.

“The Corrupt D.A. has no case,” Trump wrote of the charges, expected to be in the dozens, with at least one felony.

“What he does have is a venue where it is IMPOSSIBLE for me to get a Fair Trial (it must be changed!), and a Trump Hating Judge, hand selected by the [George] Soros backed D.A. (he must be changed!),” he wrote after long claiming the case against him is a “witch hunt.”

“Also has the DOJ working in the D.A.’s Office – Unprecedented!”

Trump is expected to report to the courthouse Tuesday morning, where he will be fingerprinted and have a mug shot taken, like anyone else facing charges.

Once the booking is complete, Trump will appear before a judge for an afternoon arraignment.

His attorney in the case, Joe Tacopina, has said the 45th commander-in-chief will not be handcuffed, but predicted Bragg’s team will “try to make sure they get some joy out of this by parading him” in a perp walk and leaking the mugshot.

Keep reading.

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

RELATED TWEET:

WATCH: Trump supporters are out in full force today on Southern Blvd near Mar a Lago and the Palm Beach airport to rally in support of President Donald J Trump as he heads to New York for a WITCH HUNT INDICTMENT!

I am on the ground and will be reporting here all day! #Trump2024 pic.twitter.com/Iv9o3ACPaJ

— Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) April 3, 2023

RELATED ARTICLES:

Trump Lawyer: No Handcuffs, No Plea Deal

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

LIVE Streaming of Protests and Aspects of the Trump Indictment thumbnail

LIVE Streaming of Protests and Aspects of the Trump Indictment

By Vlad Tepes Blog

“[E]very war in the past 50 years was started by media lies” — Julian Assange


I think that may also apply to the civil war playing out in the U.S. today. It isn’t very kinetic yet. But it is a civil war.

WATCH: PRESIDENT TRUMP INDICTMENT: LIVE Coverage of Protests, Rallies in Manhattan 4-4-23

EDITORS NOTE: This Vlad Tepes Blog column by Eeyore is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Boston Children’s Hospital Director Calls for Drastic Increase in Capacity for Gender Surgeries, Castrations, Sexual Mutilations for Children thumbnail

Boston Children’s Hospital Director Calls for Drastic Increase in Capacity for Gender Surgeries, Castrations, Sexual Mutilations for Children

By The Geller Report

But, but, but, they said this wasn’t happening.

Facts:

  • The child sex change industry is massive and growing, and children undergoing cross-sex treatments can bring a massive cash influx to hospitals, pharmaceutical companies and others in the medical industry.
  • From 2017-2019 at least 56 genital surgeries and 776 mastectomies were performed on minors as part of the gender transition process in the U.S., but even this figure is outdated and vastly underestimates the scope of the child sex change industry by excluding certain patients.
  • “There is no question that financial rewards play a role in the adoption of gender affirming care. Hospitals and physicians generate substantial payments from insurers or self pay patients when children enter into the transition protocols,” Dr. Stanley Goldfarb, board chair of Do No Harm and former Associate Dean for Curriculum at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, told the Daily Caller News Foundation.

Boston Children’s Hospital director calls for drastic increase in capacity for gender surgeries for minors

The director at Boston Children’s Hospital said medical school students should learn transgender surgeries in residency programs

By Hannah Grossman | Fox News

Detransitioned teen Chloe Cole: I’m afraid my generation will be led astray

Former transgender kid, Chloe Cole, shares the complications she deals with every day as a result of medical interventions she was subjected to after being diagnosed with gender dysphoria. “I’m not sure whether it’ll even go away,” she said.

Boston Children’s Hospital co-director at its Center for Gender Surgery called for a drastic increase in capacity for what he called “gender-affirming care” (GAC), including surgeries, for kids as GOP states enact bans on the practices.

Oren Ganor is a plastic and reconstructive surgeon who specializes in gender-affirming surgeries. He has previously stated in an email that the hospital is “slightly flexible” when it comes to the age of transgender girls seeking genital surgery,” according to a local outlet. The policy had not been finalized, he said, “because of the issue around consent for sterilization.”

The children’s hospital clarified to Fox News Digital that it does not provide genital surgeries on kids. A patient needs to live in their new gender for 12 months before the genital surgeries are considered.

In a March 14 article he co-wrote with a medical school student, Shawheen J. Rezei, in The Journal of the American Medical Association, he said that the capacity for gender surgeries for kids needed to be increased.

Read more.

Detransitioner Chloe Cole gives an emotional testimony about receiving life altering trans surgery as a minor in California. pic.twitter.com/hwqmRU8Igz

— Therealunclemanny (@Realunclemanny) March 30, 2023

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

RELATED ARTICLES:

Billion-Dollar Transgender Industry Leaves Broken Families and Lives

‘Lucrative Business’: The Child Sex Change Industry Is Exploding In The U.S.

EXCLUSIVE COVERAGE: Kirk Cameron’s Brave Story Hour Forced Outside NYC Main Library After He Was Denied Space Indoors

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Trump Indictment: ‘The Only Way You Can Explain This Is Politics’ thumbnail

Trump Indictment: ‘The Only Way You Can Explain This Is Politics’

By Family Research Council

This Thursday, following weeks of rumors swirling about a potential indictment by a New York grand jury, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg led the indictment of former U.S. President Donald Trump. The indictment centers on more than 30 counts related to business fraud over alleged hush money paid to a pornography actress known as Stormy Daniels with the intentions of hiding a prior affair while he campaigned president in 2016.

Conservative thinkers, regardless of their personal support for Trump’s 2024 presidential bid, have widely decried the indictment as being politically motivated, observing that the Manhattan district attorney has a spotty record of pursuing more serious criminals.

“Anybody else other than Donald Trump would never be charged with this in Manhattan,” asserted Andrew McCarthy, former assistant U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, in an interview on “Washington Watch with Tony Perkins.” “The pattern of Alvin Bragg, as long as he’s been the district attorney, has actually been the opposite of that. It’s to take actual, real criminal activity by hardened offenders and basically deflate it from serious felonies down to misdemeanors or even not pursue it at all here.”

McCarthy added, “In Trump’s case, he’s taking something that’s a trivial, stale misdemeanor at best — and whether he’s got the proof of that remains to be seen — and he’s trying to inflate it into a felony that could result in a four-year prison sentence. So, the only way you can explain this is politics.”

Some commentators have raised speculation about how political maneuvering behind the indictment may play into Democratic strategy related to the 2024 election. Before the indictment, Twitter CEO Elon Musk said, “If this [an indictment] happens, Trump will be re-elected in a landslide victory.” Meanwhile, after news of the indictment broke, conservative pundit Ann Coulter stated, “They’re trying to make [Trump] our nominee. Would they do that because they think he’d be tough to beat or easy to beat?”

Regardless of the intended outcome, it appears that many operatives on the Left are eager to see the former president in handcuffs. Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (Calif.), former Democratic Speaker of the House, stated, “The Grand Jury has acted upon the facts and the law. No one is above the law, and everyone has the right to a trial to prove innocence. Hopefully, the former president will peacefully respect the system, which grants him that right.” Pelosi received many replies retorting that the American legal system is built on the basis of those accused being treated as innocent until proven guilty.

McCarthy summarized the progressive weaponization of the mechanisms of government against political opponents, saying, “First, it’s the history of the progressive movement, particularly in its late 20th century and early 21st century ascendancy and iteration that it uses. Basically, it uses the levers of power as a penalty and uses processes in a punitive way. That’s sort of how it operates, and we’ve seen it in a bunch of different scenarios.” He went on to add, “And secondly, unlike prosecutors in the federal government, prosecutors in the state government, district attorneys, and also even state attorneys general are elected officials. They are not appointed, and they’re not vetted by the Senate to make sure that they won’t use their powers in a partisan way.”

McCarthy concluded, “I think it’s better to look at Alvin Bragg as an elected progressive Democrat in Manhattan than it is to look at him as a law enforcement official. His actions make much more sense if you see him that way.”

AUTHOR

Joy Stockbauer

Joy Stockbauer is a correspondent for The Washington Stand.

RELATED ARTICLES:

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserve. ©2023 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

‘QAnon Shaman’ Jacob Chansley Released Early From Prison After Newly Disclosed Jan. 6 Footage thumbnail

‘QAnon Shaman’ Jacob Chansley Released Early From Prison After Newly Disclosed Jan. 6 Footage

By The Geller Report

When the truth was made known.

The “QAnon Shaman” Jacob Chansley has been freed from prison 14 months early after Tucker Carlson broadcast never-before-seen exculpatory Jan. 6 footage showed him being escorted into Senate by cops.

By: Zachary Stieber, The Epoch Times, March 30, 2023:

The man known as the QAnon Shaman, who pleaded guilty to breaching the U.S. Capitol, has been released from prison early after Fox News aired footage of him being escorted by police officers inside the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

Jacob Chansley, 35, was moved to a halfway house in Phoenix on March 28, a U.S. Bureau of Prisons spokesperson told The Epoch Times in an email. He had been serving a 41-month sentence, handed down in November 2021, in federal prison after pleading guilty to one count of obstructing an official proceeding.

The release comes after Fox News’ Tucker Carlson broadcast never-before-seen footage that showed U.S. Capitol Police officers walking around inside the Capitol with Chansley.

Chansley’s current and former lawyers are offering different views as to whether the footage played a role in his early release.

“Jake is out on schedule. I told him 16 months ago in our first conversation, it would be Feb. or Mar. 2023,” William Shipley, Chansley’s current lawyer, wrote on social media on March 30.

While Chansley was expecting to serve nearly his full sentence in prison, Shipley noted that federal inmates can get early release for good behavior and participation in various programs.

“I didn’t do anything extraordinary—this was always the schedule, I just understood it and could explain it to him,” Shipley said.

Albert Watkins, Chansley’s former lawyer, said he couldn’t comment about the reason for the early release.

“After serving eleven months in solitary prior to his sentence being imposed, and only 16 months of his sentence thereafter, it is appropriate this gentle and intelligent young man be permitted to move forward with the next stage of what undoubtedly will be a law abiding and enriching life,” Watkins said in a statement to news outlets. “I applaud the decision of the U.S. Bureau of Prison [sic] in this regard.”

The bureau said it couldn’t discuss a specific inmate’s release, but confirmed that inmates can earn time for good conduct.

Before the First Step Act, enacted by former President Donald Trump, federal inmates could earn up to 54 days of good conduct time for each year of their sentence served. Under the law, inmates can now earn up to 54 days of good conduct time for each year of their imposed sentence.

Shipley said in another post that the videos played on Fox “DID NOT play a role” in Chansley’s release.

The final months of the sentence were always going to be served at a halfway house, Shipley said. He also reiterated that his client received time off for completing bureau programs, in addition to the credit for being on good behavior.

“We have known the release date for a period of time, but kept it quiet so as to not have a crowd show up at either the BOP facility or the Halfway House,” Shipley said.

Keep reading.

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Joint Chiefs Chairman: ‘35,000 People a Week’ Crossing the SW Border. ‘That’s an Army.’ thumbnail

Joint Chiefs Chairman: ‘35,000 People a Week’ Crossing the SW Border. ‘That’s an Army.’

By The Geller Report

Male — young, fit, military age.

By: CNS News, April 2, 2023:

Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas this week refused again to call the situation at the U.S.-Mexico border a “crisis,” but Gen. Mark Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, had no such reluctance when he testified before the House Armed Services Committee on Wednesday:

“So, there is a crisis at that border,” Milley said.

He was responding to a question about whether President Joe Biden has ever asked Milley for a briefing about national security threats at the southern border:

“I have been in several meetings and briefings, principals’ committees, and other forums specifically about the southern border…A couple of them were with the vice president and some discussions with the president,” Milley said.

“Now, if I could, look, at the southern border situation is a very serious situation, and you know it as well as I do.

“And that there’s some — I think it’s in the range — the reports I get is about 5,000 a day. You’re talking about 35,000 people a week. That’s an Army Corps that comes across that border.

“And then, with the fentanyl issue that you’re talking about, look, I don’t know what the exact numbers are. But, the ranges that have been reported to me is something between 70 and 100,000. That’s an enormous amount of casualties and people dying, young kids dying in our communities.

“So, there is a crisis at that border. Now, the question is what do you do about it? And we have to work much closer, I think anyway with Mexico. There’s certain things that have to be done along the border with the CPB and others. Now, that’s out of our lane. That’s DHS, et cetera.”

Rep. Jim Banks (R-Ind.) said he was told by General Glen VanHerck, head of the U.S. Northern Command and the North American Aerospace Defense Command, that President Biden could ask the military to do more about border security, but Milley said he’d have to check with VanHerck about that:

“I personally think the primary, the lead, should be on the border itself, clearly law enforcement as opposed to the military,” Milley said.

“Now, mechanically could you line up divisions of troops? Of course you could. But, is that the right thing to do? Is that the right way to do it? And I would certainly advise against that.

We’ll execute whatever decisions are made. But, lining up –”

Read more.

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

DNC Lawyer Suing Trump Over Jan 6 Arrested for Child Porn, Depicting Children as Young as 5-Years Old. thumbnail

DNC Lawyer Suing Trump Over Jan 6 Arrested for Child Porn, Depicting Children as Young as 5-Years Old.

By The Geller Report

This is the Democrat party. Makes sense of their policies and their obsession with sexualizing children, does it not?

Michael T. Dolce, a lawyer who specialized in fighting child sex abuse (no joke), was arrested by the feds at his West Palm Beach apartment on March 15.

Partner From Law Firm That Represents DNC and is Suing Trump Over Jan 6 on Behalf of Democrats in Congress Arrested for Possessing Child Porn

By Cristina Laila, TGP, Apr. 1, 2023:

partner at Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll, a law firm representing the DNC and suing Trump over January 6 on behalf of Democrats in Congress, was arrested for possessing child pornography.

Mr. Dolce’s LinkedIn listed him as a partner at Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC.

According to reports, Michael Dolce is no longer listed on the Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll website.

Local 10 reported:

Federal prosecutors accused a 53-year-old South Florida attorney who represents victims of child sexual abuse of possessing child sexual abuse material himself.

According to prosecutors, who announced the arrest Wednesday, Michael T. Dolce is expected to appear in a West Palm Beach federal court Thursday where he is facing multiple child pornography charges.
According to his arrest affidavit, on March 15, FBI agents executed a search warrant at Dolce’s West Palm Beach apartment.

Detectives said they discovered Dolce actively downloading child sexual abuse material using peer-to-peer software.

Investigators said nearly 2,000 images and videos of child pornography were recovered from his devices.

According to a federal criminal complaint, the images and videos depicted girls as young as 5 years old.

Keep reading.

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

RELATED ARTICLES:

Nashville Shooting: Too many guns or not enough God – Video

L.A. City Council Reinstates Taxpayer Salary of L.A. County Supervisor, City Councilman Convicted of Slew of Federal Corruption Charges, Bribery, Conspiracy

SHOT TWICE, Manhattan Garage Worker Is Charged with Attempted Murder After Grabbing Gun In Self Defense

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Connecticut Democrats Seek to Create a Censorship Board to Limit Free Speech thumbnail

Connecticut Democrats Seek to Create a Censorship Board to Limit Free Speech

By The Geller Report

Make no mistake, these are the actions of totalitarian destroyers. History is riddled with the human toll of these villains.

“The principle of free speech is not concerned with the content of a man speech and does not protect only the expression of good ideas, but all ideas. If it were otherwise who would determine which ideas are good and which have been? The government?” Ayn Rand, America’s greatest political philosopher, eloquently explained.

Freedom of speech is the foundation of a free society. Without it, a tyrant can wreak havoc unopposed, while his opponents are silenced. Putting up with being offended is essential in a pluralistic society in which people differ on basic truths. If a group will not bear being offended without resorting to violence, that group will rule unopposed while everyone else lives in fear, while other groups curtail their activities to appease the violent group. This results in the violent group being able to tyrannize the others.

If speech that offends a group is outlawed, that group has absolute power, and a free society is destroyed. A group that cannot be criticized cannot be opposed. It can work its will no matter what it is, and no one will be able to say anything to stop it.

The antidote to bad speech is more speech. But the left cannot permit the free exchange of ideas because their failed ideas cannot stand up to scrutiny and challenge.

Inoffensive speech needs no protection. The First Amendment was developed precisely in order to protect speech that was offensive to some, in order to prevent those who had power from claiming they were offended by speech opposing them and silencing the powerless.

A free society is by its nature one in which people put up with others being uncivil and offensive. The alternative is a quiet authoritarian society in which only one opinion is allowed and the others are silenced, and ultimately sent to the camps.

Connecticut Democrats Seek to Create a Censorship Board to Limit Free Speech

By: Wendell Husebo,  Breitbart News, April. 1, 2023:

The Democrat-dominated Connecticut legislature is seeking to create a censorship board through Senate Bill 6410 to regulate online speech.

The bill would establish a board to study so-called online “harassment” of individuals, including government officials, and recommend legislation to censor free speech by the creation of reporting guidelines. The censorship board would consist of nine members, four of whom would represent the minority Republican party.

The bill states:

Such assessment shall include, but need not be limited to,

(1) short term and long term effects of harassing behaviors online on elected officials, public officials and residents of this state,

(2) what state or municipal action is needed to address negative online behaviors that consider a citizen’s right to freedom of speech versus an individual’s right to be free from harassment including, but not limited to, potential changes in state law concerning  additional penalties or enforcement of online harassment, and

(3) establishing guidelines for the reporting of online harassment of elected state and municipal officials that find a balance between making elected officials accessible to the people whom they serve and protecting them from abusive, offensive or threatening online harassment.

Chris Zeller, executive director of the Connecticut Republican party (CTGOP), told Breitbart News the Democrats are trying to pass a censorship measure to cover up their agenda.

“They are trying to hide years of incompetent governance and a far-left agenda that is too radical for the average Connecticut voter,” he said.

Keep reading.

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

RELATED ARTICLE: DNC Lawyer Suing Trump Over Jan 6 on Behalf of Democrats in Congress Arrested for Child Porn, Depicting Children as Young as 5 Years Old.

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Law Enforcement Legal Defense Fund Map of ‘Seventy’ Soros Linked Rogue Prosecutors thumbnail

Law Enforcement Legal Defense Fund Map of ‘Seventy’ Soros Linked Rogue Prosecutors

By Lyle J. Rapacki, Ph.D.

Below is the Law Enforcement Legal Defense Fund (LELDF) map showing the locations of seventy “rogue/progressive” prosecutors/District Attorneys like the Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, who has been in the news for indicting former President Trump.

NEW, UPDATED MAP: The U.S. currently has 70 Soros-backed social justice prosecutors. pic.twitter.com/YE4Gnx2OfV

— Law Enforcement Legal Defense (@LELDF) March 29, 2023


CLICK THE BELOW LINK TO READ THE FULL LELDF REPORT

JUSTICE FOR SALE — How George Soros put Radical Prosecutors in Power


These prosecutors are cut in the same cloth as George Soros, the noted Marxist and hater of all things America, and that is by his own public admission.

Ignore the U.S. Constitution. Ignore the Rule of Law. Bring division in the criminal justice system and openly allow crime to spread by not adhering to their Oath of Office, these Marxist Prosecutors are creating serious danger to society, law enforcement, and the principles by which our nation was founded and ordered all these years.

Terribly sad how the fox has come into the hen house unchallenged – and seems to be ready to remain for a while.

©2023 Lyle J. Rapacki, Ph.D., All rights reserved.

RELATED VIDEO: “People Understand We’ve Literally Become a Banana Republic” – Eric Trump Offers AMAZING DEFENSE of His Father following Soros-Funded DA’s Political Indictment of His Father

RELATED ARTICLES:

Bragg Was Looking to Charge Trump with a Felony, Could Land Himself in Prison for Years Instead

Bragg Confirms Federal Funds Used in Trump Probe, Bolstering GOP Investigation

Partner From Law Firm That Represents DNC and is Suing Trump Over Jan 6 on Behalf of Democrats in Congress Arrested for Possessing Child Porn

Trump Attorney Joseph Tacopina Speaks Out About The ‘Indictment’ [Videos] thumbnail

Trump Attorney Joseph Tacopina Speaks Out About The ‘Indictment’ [Videos]

By Dr. Rich Swier

Joseph Tacopina, founder of Tacopina, Seigel & DeOreo,  is one of the country’s most respected high-stakes trial attorneys, having successfully tried more than 100 cases in his distinguished career. He frequently represents clients in high-stakes civil, criminal and commercial litigation, zealously advancing their interests and often recovering substantial money damages.

Mr. Tacopina gave a series of interviews about the Trump indictment. This trail is historic and has never happened before. This is the first time any president has been indicted.

Rikki Klieman, CBS News Legal Analyst said that Tacopina is, “One of the great trial lawyers in America who wins cases that nobody else could win.”

Reverend Al Sharpton said of Tacopina is, “One of the best attorneys in the country!”

The New York Times wrote, “Mr. Tacopina is to the defense bar what Donald Trump is to real estate.”

GQ Magazine wrote, “Joe is different…he wins.”

Watch:

READY TO FIGHT: Trump Lawyer Says ‘Zero Chance of Plea Deal,’ ‘There’s No Crime’

TACOPINA: “[Trump] will not take a plea deal on this case. It’s not gonna happen. There’s no crime. I don’t know if it’s gonna make it to trial because we have substantial legal challenges.”

Trump attorney previews legal process for next week’s arraignment

Rule of law ‘died today’: Trump attorney Joe Tacopina

Donald Trump’s New York attorney Joe Tacopina torches ‘Soviet Union’-style indictment on ‘Hannity.’

ABOUT TACOPINA, SEIGEL Seigel & DEOREO

Tacopina Seigel & DeOreo is a Manhattan-based law firm that focuses on a full range of criminal defense and civil litigation concerns. Known for our aggressive advocacy, and our frequent representation of high-profile clients dealing with life changing situations, we deliver results with the highest level of professionalism and integrity.

When the stakes are high, sophisticated clients call on us.

As one of New York’s top criminal defense and civil litigation firms, we are widely known for our ability to effectively navigate situations that bring about immense public scrutiny. These results are underscored by our frequent representation of well-known executives, celebrities, athletes, politicians, judges, law enforcement agents, lawyers and other individuals dealing with complex and potentially life-changing concerns.

RELATED VIDEO: ‘They are a menace’: DeSantis targets ‘Soros-backed’ left-wing prosecutors

RELATED ARTICLES:

Politico Admits Case Against Trump Is Weak, Watches Our Republic Circle the Drain, Says ‘So What?’

Rep. Jamaal Bowman Says the Quiet Part Out Loud: Indictment Is About Preventing Trump From Running Again

Whatever Happened to the Dems Saying That ‘Lock Her Up’ Chants were ‘Banana Republic Stuff’?

Trump Supporter Found Guilty, Faces Ten Years in Prison for 2016 Anti-Hillary Meme

If a NY Jury Convicted Trump Supporter for a Meme, What Chance Does President Trump Have?

Congressman Jim Jordan wants to hear from prosecutors who resigned over Trump probe

©Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.