Johns Hopkins Study: LOCKDOWNS DID NOT WORK, No Impact On Death Rate thumbnail

Johns Hopkins Study: LOCKDOWNS DID NOT WORK, No Impact On Death Rate

By The Geller Report

A meta-analysis out of John Hopkins shows lockdowns had “little to no public health effects.” This is what many public health experts in academia and private sector had been saying over the past 2 years. And still the Democrats demand more draconian measures.

“Lockdown policies are ill-founded and should be rejected as a pandemic policy instrument.”

-Johns Hopkins University study, January 2022

— House Judiciary GOP (@JudiciaryGOP) February 2, 2022

Johns Hopkins report: Lockdowns did not work.

The Washington Times has a blockbuster story today, on a report from the highly respected Johns Hopkins University, that the draconian lockdowns has little for no impact on the Coronavirus.

“Lockdowns in the U.S. and Europe had little or no impact in reducing deaths from COVID-19, according to a new analysis by researchers at Johns Hopkins University. The lockdowns during the early phase of the pandemic in 2020 reduced COVID-19 mortality by about 0.2%, said the broad review of multiple scientific studies. “We find no evidence that lockdowns, school closures, border closures, and limiting gatherings have had a noticeable effect on COVID-19 mortality,” the researchers wrote.”

CLICK HERE TO: Read the study and judge for yourself.

RELATED PODCAST: KABC’s Armstrong and Getty discussed the shocking ramifications of this report this morning…hear it here

RELATED TWEET:

A recent Johns Hopkins University study found that lockdowns reduced the COVID-19 death rate by just .2 percent.

This is just further proof that we can NEVER shutdown our economy again, all 50 states should be 100% open!

— Jake Evans (@JakeEvansGA) February 2, 2022

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Quick note: Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here. We will not waver. We will not tire. We will not falter, and we will not fail. Freedom will prevail.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here — it’s free and it’s critical NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America’s survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow me on Gettr. I am there, click here. It’s open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Denmark Officially Becomes First EU Country To Drop All Domestic COVID Restrictions thumbnail

Denmark Officially Becomes First EU Country To Drop All Domestic COVID Restrictions

By The Daily Caller

Denmark lifted all domestic COVID-19 restrictions on Tuesday, becoming the first member of the European Union to do so, BBC News reported.

Cases are still relatively high in Denmark, but officials have said the high vaccination rate in the country means the virus is no longer a “critical threat,” BBC News reported.

“We have an extremely high coverage of adults vaccinated with three doses,” epidemiologist Lone Simonsen of the University of Roskilde told the AFP news agency, BBC News reported. “With Omicron not being a severe disease for the vaccinated, we believe it is reasonable to lift restrictions.”

With the restrictions rescinded, masks are no longer required to enter a store, restaurant or on public transport, and limits on the number of people gathering indoors and mandatory social distancing measures have ended, BBC News reported. The national contact-tracing app is no longer required, though individual event organizers can opt to make it a condition of entry.

Hospitals and care homes will still mandate the use of face masks in hospitals and care homes, and some restrictions remain for unvaccinated travelers attempting to cross Denmark’s borders, BBC News reported.

“Good morning to a completely open Denmark,” Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen wrote on Facebook, BBC News reported.

“No one can know what will happen next December. But we promised the citizens of Denmark that we will only have restrictions if they are truly necessary and we’ll lift them as soon as we can,” Danish Health Minister Magnus Heunicke told CNN on Monday. “That’s what’s happening right now.”

COLUMN BY

SEBASTIAN HUGHES

Contributor.

RELATED ARTICLE: Biden To Lift Travel Restrictions On Southern Africa

RELATED TWEET:

Unmask our children, keep schools open, and defund any schools that moves to go back to remote learning.

Students across America are anxious, depressed, and falling behind in their studies – give them their life back!

— Jake Evans (@JakeEvansGA) February 1, 2022

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved. Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

NORWAY: Everyone Should be Exposed to Omicron and Other Viruses in Order to Acquire Immunity thumbnail

NORWAY: Everyone Should be Exposed to Omicron and Other Viruses in Order to Acquire Immunity

By The Geller Report

Look anywhere but America for medical truths. Obamacare politicized and weaponized the once greatest healthcare system in the world.

Translation from this MSN article: 

‘Telling the truth from Norwegian Public Health to the government. Better to open up now so everyone can get infected as the vaccines given have some effect now against severe/ICU/deaths and not later.

Let it rip, which is easy as the virus is anyway unstoppable. This is clear logic. Vaccine protection against severe infection is decreasing every week rapidly. Those with two doses and not elderly/immunosuppressed will have use from the vaccine-induced B cells response, although less than natural infected, will protect them from severe outcome. Those triple vaccinated and elderly/immunosuppressed will also have some protection. The unvaccinated will have live vaccination from omicron from this unstoppable virus.

To vaccinate now is absolutely wrong. To give a booster dose in an ongoing peak will only give you the worst of worlds. The short term reduced general immunity will let you get infected more easily and also very bad to tackle the infection when your immunity is temporary reduced by the powerful vaccines.

THE ONLY SOLUTION IS OPEN UP IMMEDIATELY EVERYTHING, NO MASKS, NO FRONTIER CONTROLS AND NO VACCINATIONS WITH THE NOW USELESS WUHAN VACCINE.’

Translation MSN:

Norska FHI vill öppna upp: ”Är bättre att smittas nu”

5 dagar sedan

”Ojämlikheten ökar – men S är tysta som möss”

Tesla missar att stanna – återkallar bilar

© Tillhandahålls av Omni

Flera miljoner norrmän kommer att smittas av omikronvarianten under vintern och våren, men landet bör ändå häva de flesta restriktionerna. Det skriver norska FHI i en ny riskbedömning enligt NRK.

Myndigheten anser att det är ett bra läge att låta smittan spridas eftersom många nyligen har fått en tredje dos. Att försöka trycka tillbaka smittan skulle kräva mycket kraftfulla åtgärder som skulle vara värre för många än konsekvenserna av att få covid-19.

– Vi har en befolkning som nyligen fått den tredje dosen och har ett bra skydd mot sjukdom och sjukhusinläggning. Det är bättre att bli smittad när man är i den situationen än när vaccineffekten har minskat, säger FHI-chefen Camilla Stoltenberg.

Relaterade länkar:

FHI beräknar att det som mest kommer att vara 175 patienter som behöver respiratorbehandling samtidigt (NRK)

Över 20 000 smittofall registrerades i går (www.dagbladet.no)

Astrid Meland: Det värsta ligger framför oss (Verdens Gang)

RELATED ARTICLE: Ivermectin ‘Effective’ and ‘Safe” for Treating Covid, Japanese company says

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Quick note: Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here. We will not waver. We will not tire. We will not falter, and we will not fail. Freedom will prevail.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here — it’s free and it’s critical NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America’s survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow me on Gettr. I am there, click here. It’s open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Phony-Baloney Greenie Weenies thumbnail

Phony-Baloney Greenie Weenies

By The Daily Skirmish – Liberato.US

All you phony-baloney greenie weenies out there, I want you to know something:  everything you say is bunk.  Here are just the latest stories showing you the entire climate change narrative is a pack of lies.

The World Meteorological Organization got caught with its pants down.  It claimed the number of natural disasters increased five-fold over the last 50 years and human carbon dioxide emissions are to blame.  However, they admitted their numbers were all wrong because they were building their reporting system over that time and getting reports from more sources as time went on.  There’s a big difference between an increase in the number of reported disasters and the number of actual disasters, but they deliberately misrepresented the facts.

Speaking of misrepresentations, NOAA claims 2021 was the eighth hottest year on record, but the temperature has actually trended downward if you look at the period 2016 to 2021.  Moreover, NOAA made the pronouncement even though the degree of uncertainty in their data is higher than the temperature increase they claimed for 2021.  NOAA has a long history of faking its data.  Isn’t there a problem when you have to lie, repeatedly, to make your case?

Everybody knows wind and solar power are unreliable.  There are cloudy days and days with no wind.  Turns out, once you add increased power-generating capacity and battery storage to compensate for intermittency, stand-alone wind and solar power become impossibly expensive.  In fact, as another article states, “the cost of necessary storage becomes far and away the dominant cost of the overall system. Therefore, any meaningful proposal to replace fossil fuel generation with renewables must grapple with this issue.”  How come we never hear Greta Thunberg talk about this problem?

Electric cars will make you less free. In Britain, starting in May, “Electric car charging points in people’s homes will be preset to switch off for nine hours each weekday at times of peak demand because ministers fear blackouts on the National Grid.”  If you want to go somewhere and your car isn’t charged, you’re just out of luck.  Is that what you had in mind, or do you now admit you haven’t thought past your own slogans?

Speaking of not thinking things through, Europe closed a lot of coal plants in the last 20 years and replaced them with wind power.  But here’s what happened when the wind didn’t blow so much last year:  They used more natural gas, causing natural gas prices to spike all over the world.  Where do they get gas?  Russia.  Europe has been worried for decades about Russian dominance over the continent and here they voluntarily made themselves more dependent on Russia.  Smart!  Things like that happen when you put the ideological blinders on and chant slogans.

If these stories don’t give you pause, try these:  There are now 140 scientific papers documenting that CO2 has, at most, a miniscule effect on the earth’s temperature. Wind turbine blades can’t be recycled; they have to be buried.  Doesn’t sound very green to me.   Despite what Joe Biden says, tornadoes are not getting more frequent or severe, and the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) does not link them to greenhouse gas emissions.

So you phony-baloney greenie weenies can go right on believing the utterly delusional Leonardo DiCaprio when he tells you we only have nine years left before we’re all toast, but do us a favor, won’t you?  Leave public policy to the adults in the room and people who don’t have a sick need to lie their way into power.

Visit The Daily Skirmish and Watch Eagle Headline News – 7:30am ET Weekdays

©Christopher Wright. All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLES:

The Unrealistic Myth of Carbon Neutrality

The Brandon Administration’s First Year in Review

UVA Denies Shamgar Connors a Kidney Because of His Vax Refusal thumbnail

UVA Denies Shamgar Connors a Kidney Because of His Vax Refusal

By Dr. Rich Swier

Lauren Connors a nurse and the wife of Shamgar from Stafford, Virginia started a GoFundMe page to raise enough to get her husband a kidney after UVA denied his need because he was unvaxxed.

Lauren wrote on the GoFundMe page:

My husband has 5 stage kidney failure and is on dialysis every night waiting for his MUCH NEEDED kidney transplant.

The UVA is DENYING him a kidney and has removed him from the waitlist because he is not vaccinated.

Even though he has already survived covid and has natural immunity. We have serious concern of him taking this vaccine that has imposes risks to him because of the side effects. We desperately need financial to help us pursue legal assistance. This wouldn’t just be helping my husband. It would be helping everyone else that is being denied medical attention for life threatening illnesses. We have to make sure that this does not continue.

Please pray for my husband, Shamgar Connors, that he receives a kidney before it’s too late. Thank you for hearing our story and please help me share so we can start taking action NOW!

The Schilling Show 2/1/22: Shamgar Connors, Mallory Carroll

Shamgar Connors, husband, father, and transplant patient, shares how he was denied by UVA medical center to get a transplant because he would not get the COVID vaccine, plus, how you can help.

Head of Communications at the Susan B. Anthony List, Mallory Carroll discusses the past eight years for Virginia and more on Governor Youngkin’s Pro-Life Actions.

©Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLE: VIDEO EXCLUSIVE: DJ Ferguson 31, father of two, REFUSED Heart Transplant by Bostin Hospital, dad says he’s on ‘the edge of death’!

SISSY WATCH USA: NIH’s Collins, Columbia U’s Bollinger, Democrat’s Biden thumbnail

SISSY WATCH USA: NIH’s Collins, Columbia U’s Bollinger, Democrat’s Biden

By Dr. Rich Swier

Sissy: an effeminate man or boy : a timid, weak, or cowardly person.


We are witnessing a national push to turn our boys into timid, weak and cowardly sissies.

This “cultural sissyfication war” is being waged in Washington, D. C., in our universities and public school classrooms across America. The “sissyfication war” is well funded, nefarious and dangerous to the futures of our young boys.

In this edition of Sissy Watch USA we will focus on three individuals who are working to sissify our boys:

  1. Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr. 
  2. Lee Carroll Bollinger. President of Columbia University.
  3. Francis Sellers Collins. Director of the National Institute of Health (NIH).

Creating a Culture of the Timid, Weak and Cowardly

The Daily Wire published a column titled “NIH Spends Millions On Study That ‘Recruited’ Minors To Report Homosexual Activity – Including ‘Condomless Anal Sex’ – Without Their Parents’ Permission” by Ben Zeisloft. Zeisloft reported:

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) spent $8 million on a Columbia University research study that asked minors to submit information about their homosexual activities — including whether they participate in “condomless anal sex.

According to a report from The Washington Free Beacon’s Patrick Hauf, MyPEEPS Mobile — an app developed by Columbia University researchers — offered up to $275 for boys between 13 and 18 to document their sexual behaviors:

The NIH spent more than $300,000 to develop the app in 2012 and 2013, and $7.9 million since 2016 for Columbia researchers to study the data it collects, according to a government spending database. The app for “young men who have sex with men” provides “interactive games and activities” designed to teach participating teenagers how to minimize risk in their sex lives, according to the research grant and resulting study

According to one of the program’s studies, teenaged participants in the pilot trial were “recruited” to use the app in six different cities and traveled to attend “interventions” to discuss the sex education program, all without parental permission. [Emphasis added]

Read the full column.

The Federalist in a column titled “Under Biden Proposal, Everyone Including Kids Could More Easily Get Transgender SurgeryEleanor Bartow reported:

The Biden administration is pushing for more insurers, and thus anyone who buys their insurance, to cover transgender surgeries. Such genital, breast, and facial surgery, as well as hormone therapy and more, would be considered “medically necessary” for those wishing to identify with the other sex.

Discrimination based on race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability is prohibited in federally funded health-care facilities under the Affordable Care Act, passed during the Obama administration. A proposed rule, issued by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on January 5, would add “sexual orientation and gender identity” to that list.

The rule “places ideology ahead of sound medicine,” the Ethics and Public Policy Center said in a comment Thursday opposing the rule. It “is without legal support, contradicts long-standing scientific understandings of the human person, attempts to evade court injunctions, promotes harm to patients (especially minors), tramples religious freedom,” and more, according to the EPPC. [Emphasis added]

Read more.

The Bottom Line

Biden, Collins and Bollinger are pushing to create more and more non-binary (gender queer) boys.

Why? Follow the money.

Biden, the National Institute of Health and Columbia University are doing it for the money, the nation be damned.

Science tells is that gender is binary XY (male) and XX (female). To try to artificially create more LGBTQ+ gender confused boys is both dangerous and sick.

Apple promoting pregnant man/pregnant person emojis is laughable. Making insurance companies pay for genital, breast and hormone therapy for boys is the definition of pure evil.

Parents, a.k.a. domestic terrorists, are once again left out of this nefarious process. We the taxpayers are funding the sissyfication of our boys.

America’s taxpayers are now fundamentally transforming our boys into sissies.

How absurd and sick is that?

©Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLES: 

SISSY WATCH USA: Tim Cook and Apple’s Pregnant Man Emoji

The Catholic Church and Paedophilia: The Story Never Ends

Trump Vows to Ban Men from Women’s Sports

Europe To Rely More On Coal As Natural Gas Demand Fades thumbnail

Europe To Rely More On Coal As Natural Gas Demand Fades

By The Daily Caller

Gas-to-coal switching. 


Europe is set to rely more heavily on coal production in 2022 as liquified natural gas demand decreases due to heightened tensions with Russia, according to an International Energy Agency (IEA) report published Monday.

Natural gas demand across Europe is expected to decline by 4% compared to 2021, according to the IEA report. Coal demand is expected to continue to increase even after consumption of the fossil fuel surged 11% last year.

“Gas-fired power generation is expected to decline amid the strong expansion of renewables, while high gas prices continue to weigh on its competitiveness vis-à-vis coal-fired generation,” the report said.

European gas prices hit multiple record highs over the last several months as demand increased and Russia, the largest exporter of natural gas to Europe, abruptly altered flows into the continent. Overall, European gas demand increased about 5.5% last year, the IEA report said.

The spike in demand largely resulted from declining energy output from wind farms in Germany, which has led an aggressive push toward renewables.

But the higher prices led to greater reliance on coal, from which nations have attempted to distance themselves due to its high carbon emissions when burned.

“Record-high gas prices supported gas-to-coal switching, coal-fired power plants increasing their output by 20% (year-over-year),” the IEA said.

The U.S. power sector also turned back to coal beginning in December 2020 when demand spiked 8%, the IEA report said. Between January 2021 and October 2021, demand skyrocketed 19% relative to the same period in 2020.

Coal-powered electricity generation increased for the first time since 2014 in 2021, according to the Energy Information Administration.

COLUMN BY

THOMAS CATENACCI

Energy and environment reporter. Follow Thomas on Twitter

RELATED ARTICLE: ANALYSIS: Biden’s Nord Stream 2 Move Opens The Door To A Russian Invasion Into Ukraine

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved. Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

TAKE ACTION: Tell Lawmakers the Virginia ‘Clean’ Economy Act is a Dangerous Mistake No One Can Afford thumbnail

TAKE ACTION: Tell Lawmakers the Virginia ‘Clean’ Economy Act is a Dangerous Mistake No One Can Afford

By Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow

Make your comment right now and help Virginia end the foolish VCEA.


In 2020, the Democrats in Virginia railroaded through a piece of radical climate legislation called the Virginia Clean Economy Act (VCEA).

Its goal was to reduce the Commonwealth’s carbon emissions to zero by 2045 and would achieve its ends by bulldozing large amounts of farmland and wilderness to foist the construction of massive new solar and windfarms.

Now, a bill pending before the Virginia House of Delegates (HB 118) would lift this heavy hand of government from Virginia’s electricity generation, protect the environment, make the grid more reliable, and lower prices for everyone.

As President of CFACT, a 501(c)3, I cannot urge passage of legislation. However, I am headed over to the Virginia House of Delegates this week to testify about the terrible effects the Virginia Clean Economy Act (VCEA) is having. Ending this terrible policy is, without a doubt, in the public interest. We need your help!

Click here, scroll down to HB 118, check the box, then go to the bottom of the page and add your comment on ending the foolish VCEA today.

This is not just a Virginia issue. Everywhere in the world that government has shuttered efficient fossil fuel energy sources and forced people into wind and solar — prices have risen, the environment suffers, and reliability is destroyed.

This effort in Richmond is offering the entire country a model for how to roll back dangerous statewide Green New Deal initiatives.

Let your voice be heard. Tell legislators in Virginia that VCEA:

  • Is the most radical energy and climate legislation ever passed in the Commonwealth’s history.
  • Will cost Virginia families and businesses a whopping $2 Billion per year – which amounts to $800 annually for a family of four.
  • Will hit poorer families the hardest.
  • Will cause the harmful destruction of farmlands and forests – a whopping 770 square miles, which is 33 times the size of New York City.
  • Will destabilize the grid by relying on intermittent, unreliable solar and wind energy that has led to blackouts in Texas, California, Europe, and Australia.
  • Will do nothing to impact climate change as even EPA modeling shows if Virginia were to eliminate 100% of its carbon dioxide emissions, it would only reduce temperature by 0.0021 degrees Celsius by the year 2100.

CFACT’s friends and readers know all too well that inefficient, intermittent wind and solar are terribly destructive, expensive, and unreliable. 

Tell the Virginia House of Delegates the truth about which energy sources work and which don’t.

Add your voice to CFACT’s.

EDITORS NOTE: This CFACT column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

VIDEO: Hospital Covid Death Camps! Docs/Nurses Stunning Testimony thumbnail

VIDEO: Hospital Covid Death Camps! Docs/Nurses Stunning Testimony

By Graham Ledger

VIDEO: Hospital Covid Death Camps! Docs/Nurses Stunning Testimony – Dr. Rich Swier

Copyright © 2021 DrRichSwier.com LLC. A Florida Cooperation. All rights reserved. The DrRichSwier.com is a not-for-profit news forum for intelligent Conservative commentary. Opinions expressed by writers are solely their own. Republishing of columns on this website requires the permission of both the author and editor. For more information contact: drswier@gmail.com.

SISSY WATCH USA: Tim Cook and Apple’s Pregnant Man Emoji thumbnail

SISSY WATCH USA: Tim Cook and Apple’s Pregnant Man Emoji

By Dr. Rich Swier

“No one is more hated than he who speaks the truth.” – Plato


This edition of Sissy Watch USA is brought to you by Apple Corporation and its CEO Timothy Donald Cook. It appears Mr. Cook and his team have decided that men can get pregnant and in order to get ahead of the pregnant man curve they have produced a pregnant man emoji. But of course Tim is a sissy him/her/itself.

Watch: As Apple CEO Tim Cook in a November 19th, 2018  CNN interview says he “wanted to show kids it’s ok to be gay.”

You may want to reconsider getting your sons or daughters any Apple products for their birthdays, e.g. an iPhone.

WARNING: Tim is after your kids.

Gender and Computer Code is Binary

You would think that the people at Apple who spend a lot of time coding for Apple products would understand that gender, like computer code, is binary. Wouldn’t you?

This new pregnant man emoji fits in perfectly with the notion that gender is non-binary, even though every Apple product uses binary code. Strange wouldn’t you think?

Of course it would take a woman to point out that this is not only biologically impossible it is absurd. As U.S. Senator Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) notes, “Men still can’t get pregnant.”

Men still can’t get pregnant. pic.twitter.com/PjZjPvl6d6

— Sen. Marsha Blackburn (@MarshaBlackburn) January 29, 2022

We are learning that what the government has told us about Covid, the vaccines and the negative effects of getting jabbed is “disinformation” and many social media sites censor those who point out otherwise. But isn’t Apple and the gay/bisexual/sodomite/non-binary community pushing disinformation about the negative effects of their lifestyles?

Disinformation is rampant today. Watch how Tucker Carlson deals with Apple’s pregnant man emoji:

In the real world, men can very easily get pregnant if they don’t take proper precautions. Watch out, guys. It could happen to you. Apple’s new iPhone update includes a reminder of this: a pregnant man emoji. pic.twitter.com/2oyl8BW1aZ

— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) January 29, 2022

Here’s the scientifically absurd notion that this pregnant man emoji has brought to the forefront.

Apple is rolling out a pregnant man emoji – but Joe Rogan is labeled anti-science misinformation for allowing doctors to speak.

— 🇺🇸 From the Desk of Kat 🍊🇺🇸 (@KittyKatStaxx00) January 29, 2022

The Bottom Line

With the new IOS 15.4 update, there will new emojis available on Apple iPhones. Among them will be a “pregnant man” and “pregnant person” emojis.

The myth of a pregnant man began in 2008 when Thomas Trace Beatie became world-famous for being the first “pregnant man” in history, giving birth to a girl naturally. But Thomas Trace Beatie was biologically a female. According to The History of Yesterday,

Thomas Trace Beatie was born in 1974. He was assigned female at birth, that is why his name is also Trace.

[ … ]

As Beatie reached her teenage years, he started realizing that being a woman didn’t feel right. That is why in 2002 Thomas had sex-reassignment surgery and legally changed his gender from female to male.

[ … ]

This surgery was a bit more special as Beatie decided to keep his female reproductive organs as he always wanted to bear a child as his wife at the time Nancy wasn’t able to. With a testosterone level still low allowing a pregnancy to occur, all that was left to do is find a sperm donor suitable for the couple.

Tim Cook is part and parcel of the “cancel culture” and “culture war” being waged against the truth and our children. Apple has the perfect tools to push their agenda because you wear their products on your wrists, i.e. Apple watch, and keep you keep your iPhone in your back pocket, if your a male, or in your purse if you are a female, or purse carrying sissy who believes in the non-binary tripe.

George Orwell, in his dystopian novel 1984, wrote,

“Power is in tearing human minds to pieces and putting them together again in new shapes of your own choosing.” 

Tim Cook is tearing apart our children’s minds and putting them back together to push his gay agenda.

So, there you have it.

Apple’s mythological pregnant man emoji and Sissy Watch USA’s second star Tim Cook, CEO of Apple, Inc.

BTW: Apple is also into the unrealistic myth of carbon neutrality.

©Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLES:

America’s Sissy Problem

SISSY WATCH USA: Scott Kirby, CEO of United Airlines

This is how I’m teaching my kids to resist “cancel culture”

The Hunt for the ‘Gay Gene’ Continues thumbnail

The Hunt for the ‘Gay Gene’ Continues

By MercatorNet – Navigating Modern Complexities

A recent Australian study revives interest in a largely discredited theory.


When it was released in 2011, Lady Gaga’s “Born This Way” was the hottest song of the year, topping the charts in 25 countries. It became a gay anthem, with its message that “No matter gay, straight, or bi’, lesbian, transgender life / I’m on the right track, baby”.

That was more than a decade ago.

Whatever has happened to the notion that gays and lesbians are “born this way”, that their sexual orientation is not a matter of choice, but of genetic hard-wiring? The biological model of homosexuality has gone very quiet lately.

There could be a few reasons.

First, with the legalisation of same-sex marriage around the world, homosexuality has been normalised; discrimination has been banned. Just as the debate over the origin of Covid-19 has faded into the background as the disease becomes endemic, endless disputations over an endemic psychological condition seem less urgent.

Second, the transgender movement is sucking the oxygen out of the debate over a biological origin for homosexuality. The whole idea of fluidity is that gender is a choice: you can be whoever or whatever you want to be. Arguing in favour of a fixed sexual orientation has become old-fogeyish.

Third, a major investigation of the question in the leading journal Science in 2019 found that there was no single “gay gene” — which had been the holy grail of this research for decades. The question was still open, according to the researchers, but it appeared that the genetic component to homosexuality was very small. “Same-sex sexual behavior is influenced by not one or a few genes but many,” they wrote. It was the ultimate bad hair day for biological explanations.

Fourth, the search for a biological explanation was a double-edged sword. If a gay gene did exist, it could be detected with rapidly improving testing technology for embryos. Parents might abort a potentially gay offspring. Better not to know at all.

Nowadays, the only place where the biological explanation survives and thrives may be in legislature chambers when “gay conversion therapy” is outlawed. “The consensus in the medical community is ‘yes, we are born that way’,” as one Californian radio station put it. “We can’t change who we are, and we shouldn’t even try.”

But it’s hard to argue that we can’t change unless sexual orientation is genetic. So the hunt for a genetic basis goes on.

The latest development is an article by Australian researchers which appeared a few days ago in The Journal of Sex Research, a leading peer-reviewed academic journal. They used population data from The Netherlands to contend that “having a greater number of older brothers increases the probability of a person entering a same-sex union at some point in their lives”.

In effect, they are proposing, not a genetic cause, but a hormonal one. “This effect has been attributed to a mother’s immune reaction to proteins produced by a male foetus,” they wrote. “The proteins enter the mother’s bloodstream and trigger the production of antibodies that influence the sexual development of subsequent children. These maternal antibodies accumulate over successive pregnancies with male foetuses, which means men with more older brothers are more likely to experience same-sex sexual attraction.”

It’s an ingenious hypothesis – and one that has been proposed before. It’s called the fraternal birth order effect.

What the Australian researchers contribute to the debate is statistical, not medical or genetic. The hormonal explanation is entirely speculative. They found a correlation between the number of older brothers Dutch men born between 1940 and 1990 had and whether they entered a same-sex marriage or civil partnership.

The authors insist that a biological explanation is still important so that gays and lesbians will be fully accepted in society. “People who view sexual orientation as a product of biological factors (such as hormones or genetics) are more likely to support sexual minorities and their civil rights, compared to those who view it as a product of social factors or individual choice,” they write.

MercatorNet asked Dr Paul Sullins, an American sociologist who has written extensively about homosexuality, for a quick assessment of the Australian study. He responded that: “even if the fraternal birth order idea unexpectedly found convincing evidence, it would only explain part of the genetic basis of a minority of male homosexuals. It would not, by itself, re-establish the discarded hypothesis that homosexuality is largely or wholly innate.” Furthermore, he told MercatorNet:

“The idea it embodies is one of a number of early speculations about a possible genetic basis for homosexuality, which included cousin genetics, childhood gender nonconformity, different proposed ‘gay genes’ or genome sequences, lack of exposure to certain hormones in utero, finger length, and other notions long on creativity and hopeful credulity but short on evidence.

“Virtually all of these ideas are dismissed today outside a few true believers in one or more of them due to the advance of solid twin and GWAS [genome-wide association study] evidence showing pretty conclusively that a) the genetic basis for homosexuality is small compared to environmental contributions and b) what genetic association there is is diffuse, unrelated to any particular discoverable cause.”

It remains to be seen if the Australian study will make a splash. The authors allude to a 2006 Danish study which was also based on population-level data. It found no association between homosexuality and fraternal birth order. In fact, it apparently found the opposite: straight men had a greater number of older siblings. “Heterosexual marriage was significantly linked to having young parents, small age differences between parents, stable parental relationships, large sibships, and late birth order,” the Danish authors wrote.

The hunt for the gay gene continues. Slowly.

COLUMN BY

Michael Cook

Michael Cook is the editor of MercatorNet. More by Michael Cook

RELATED ARTICLE: We live in a culture of decadent mercy

EDITORS NOTE: This MercatorNet column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

VIDEO: Disadvantaged Populations Receiving Excessive Vaccinations for Money thumbnail

VIDEO: Disadvantaged Populations Receiving Excessive Vaccinations for Money

By Project Veritas

*CLICK HERE TO TWEET OUT THE VIDEO*


Project Veritas released Part 2 of our series today featuring homeless and lower-income populations receiving excessive vaccinations for the financial incentive of a $100 gift card.

Here are some of the highlights from today’s video:

  • Project Veritas investigated the practices of DocGo/Ambulnz screeners in the field and obtained undercover footage of employees giving advice on how to circumvent rules to obtain gift cards in exchange for excessive vaccinations.
  • In one instance, an administrator for DocGo/Ambulnz describes how “flipping the names and the date of birth” allows for people to bypass safeguards in the system intended to flag multiple vaccinations.
  • In another instance an RN for DocGo/Ambulnz advises an undercover journalist for Project Veritas to “try something somewhere else where it’s not the same company.”
  • DocGo/Ambulnz employees were also captured on undercover recordings giving anecdotal testimony about how gift cards they distribute are sometimes missing money: “It was in the system that the money was already removed. We’re giving out blank cards.”

You can watch the video by here.

It is an outrage that taxpayer funds are being misused in this way.

Especially concerning is the potential that DocGo/Ambulnz employees appear to be enabling people to commit fraudulent acts by seemingly instructing them on how to get away with receiving a gift card for a vaccination.

Project Veritas will get to the bottom of this. Stay tuned…

EDITORS NOTE: This Project Veritas video report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Doctor’s Organization Has Treated Over 150,000 COVID-19 Patients With 99.99 Percent Survival ‘Early Treatment Works, Period’ thumbnail

Doctor’s Organization Has Treated Over 150,000 COVID-19 Patients With 99.99 Percent Survival ‘Early Treatment Works, Period’

By The Geller Report

This while Biden and the Democrats make access to effective treatment inaccessible. It’s a crime against humanity.

‘Early Treatment Works, Period’

By Meiling Lee, The Epoch Times, January 27, 2022

A doctor who has been offering free telehealth services to COVID-19 patients during the pandemic says that early treatment for COVID-19 works, claiming that he has a 99.99 percent survival rate.

“We have a team of volunteer free doctors that donate their time to help treat these patients that come to us,” Dr. Ben Marble, the founder of myfreedoctor.com, an online medical consultation service, said at a roundtable discussion hosted by Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) on Jan. 24.

He added, “We deliver the early treatment protocols to them as early as we can, and we have a 99.99 percent survival rate. So, I believe myfreedoctor.com, the free volunteered doctors have settled the science on this—early treatment works, period!”

Marble was answering Johnson’s question about what people can do if they or their loved ones have COVID-19.

People can visit the website myfreedoctor.com, create an account, and fill out a patient intake form if the doctors are accepting new patients for that day. One of the doctors will then reach out in less than 24 hours. With a huge demand for their services, the physicians say they can only “accept a certain number of patients each day.”

Marble says that he and his small team of volunteer doctors prescribe [Dr. Peter] McCullough’s treatment protocol, which consists of hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, monoclonal antibodies, prednisone, and other low-cost generic drugs. They also prescribe vitamins D and C, and zinc.

McCullough, a cardiologist, and epidemiologist, along with several physicians put together an early treatment protocol to provide outpatient care for COVID-19 patients. Their paper was published in The American Journal of Medicine in August 2020.

Dr. Pierre Kory, a pulmonologist and the President at the Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care (FLCCC) Alliance, says that the public is not aware that there are doctors across the country who will provide telehealth and early treatment for COVID-19.

“On our website, we have a button, which says find a provider. We’ve tried to collect as many telehealth providers that treat all states in the country,” Kory said.

“We are trying to let that message be known because that message is being suppressed that this disease is treatable,” he added.

Kory also claims that there is corruption at the federal level in suppressing early treatment with repurposed cheap drugs and their availability and that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has been “captured by the pharmaceutical industry.”

“The corruption is because they don’t want you to use off-label, repurposed generic medicines. It does not provide profit to the system,” Kory said, adding that, “you know what’s going on in this country right now, is that the CDC has been captured by the pharmaceutical industry.”

“They sent out a memo in August of 2021, they sent out a similar memo back in the spring 2020, telling the nation’s physicians and pharmacists not to use generic medicines.”

The Epoch Times has reached out to the CDC for comment.

Early treatments were and continue to be discouraged by the CDC, whose guidance since the beginning of the pandemic up until January 2022, only focused on people self-quarantining for 14 days, keeping hydrated, taking analgesics, and only seeking hospital care when they can’t breathe or turn blue. They also warned people to not take any medications not approved for COVID-19.

“People have been seriously harmed and even died after taking products not approved for use to treat or prevent COVID-19, even products approved or prescribed for other uses,” the CDC wrote on its potential treatments webpage.

The weblink provided for the alleged harmful product was related to a March 2020 health alert warning of a serious health effect from ingesting non-pharmaceutical chloroquine phosphate used to clean fish tanks. This alert came after an Arizona man and his wife took the non-pharmaceutical drug in an attempt to self-medicate for COVID-19.

For the past two years, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has only authorized limited early outpatient treatments for COVID-19 that include monoclonal antibodies for high-risk patients and antiviral pills from Merck and Pfizer. However, the FDA on Jan. 24 announced it was limiting the use of Eli Lilly and Regeneron monoclonal antibodies only to patients “likely to have been infected with or exposed to a variant that is susceptible to these treatments.”

Johnson held the roundtable discussion to offer a different perspective on the response to the pandemic, including on “the current state of knowledge of early and hospital treatment, vaccine efficacy and safety, what went right, what went wrong, what should be done now, and what needs to be addressed long term.”

The discussion panel consisted of renowned health experts and scientists that included McCullough, Dr. Robert Malone, and Dr. Paul Marik.

According to a press release, Johnson also invited over a dozen prominent figures involved in developing, promoting, and leading the pandemic response, including the CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky and White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator Jeffrey Zients. All of the individuals declined to attend the forum.

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Quick note: Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here. We will not waver. We will not tire. We will not falter, and we will not fail. Freedom will prevail.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here — it’s free and it’s critical NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America’s survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

The Unrealistic Myth of Carbon Neutrality thumbnail

The Unrealistic Myth of Carbon Neutrality

By Dr. Rich Swier

“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie, deliberate, contrived and dishonest, but the myth, persistent, persuasive and unrealistic.” – John F. Kennedy


Carbon neutrality is a state of net-zero carbon dioxide emissions. The term net zero means achieving a balance between the carbon emitted into the atmosphere, and the carbon removed from it. This balance – or net zero – will happen when the amount of carbon we add to the atmosphere is no more than the amount removed.

Proponents of carbon neutrality believe it can be achieved by: 1.) balancing emissions of carbon dioxide with its removal or 2.) by eliminating all carbon emissions from society.

FACT: Carbon is the most common element in the human body, making up 18% of the body by mass. Its role is mostly structural, forming the “backbone” of many organic molecules.

In an article titled “What Does Carbon Do for Human Bodies?” Glenn Singer reported:

Cellular respiration is a process through which the body releases energy stored in glucose, which is a compound composed of carbon, hydrogen and oxygen. That energy is used to produce adenosine triphosphate, or ADP, which scientists call the “energy currency” of the cell. During respiration, the body oxidizes glucose and energy is released. The oxygen in the compound is reduced to water, while the carbon atoms in the glucose are released as carbon dioxide.

[ … ]

Scientists estimate that a human being breathes about 20,000 times a day, thanks to the components of the respiratory system — the nose, throat, windpipe, voice box and lungs. The air that people breathe consists of several gases, with oxygen most important for cell growth and energy. Carbon dioxide, a waste gas, is produced when carbon is mixed with oxygen during cellular metabolism.

[ … ]

A carbon-based substance, activated charcoal — very fine particles — can be a life-saver. It is a highly porous substance, able to bind many harmful substances, and often is used in hospital emergency rooms to treat drug overdoses and chemical poisonings.

So, humans are biologically carbon dioxide producers by just breathing in and out. So, what does this mean for those who want to eliminate all carbon emissions from society? Do they want to kill all humans to reach carbon neutrality?

The Biden administration, “Aims at 50-52 Percent Reduction in U.S. Greenhouse Gas Pollution from 2005 Levels in 2030.

According to the EPA Greenhouse gases are:

  • Carbon dioxide (CO2) Carbon dioxide enters the atmosphere through burning fossil fuels (coal, natural gas, and oil), solid waste, trees and other biological materials, and also as a result of certain chemical reactions (e.g., manufacture of cement).
  • Methane (CH4) Methane is emitted during the production and transport of coal, natural gas, and oil.
  • Nitrous oxide (N2O) Nitrous oxide is emitted during agricultural, land use, industrial activities, combustion of fossil fuels and solid waste, as well as during treatment of wastewater.
  • Fluorinated gases [A]re emitted from a variety of industrial processes.

Therefore, according to the EPA, in order to reduce greenhouse gas pollution by 50-52% we must: stop using all fossil fuels, stop making cement, stop transporting coal, natural gas and oil, stop growing crops and raising cattle, pigs, chickens, etc., stop industrial activities, stop treating waste water and finally end all industrial processes.

Carbon Neutrality is a Myth

The truth is that mankind cannot become carbon neutral without hurting mankind itself.

To understand this let’s look at the state of California’s Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS). According to the RPS website:

The Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS) is one of California’s key programs for advancing renewable energy. The program sets continuously escalating renewable energy procurement requirements for the state’s load-serving entities. Generation must be procured from RPS-certified facilities. The California Energy Commission verifies RPS claims.

According to the RPS’ Regulations Specifying Enforcement Procedures for the Renewables the definition of “Procure” means:

to acquire electricity products from eligible renewable energy resources, either directly from the eligible renewable energy resource or from a third party, through executed contracts or ownership agreements.

Paige Lambermont in an article titled “California Will Continue to Reap the Blackouts It Sows” reported:

It doesn’t take an engineer to see the worrying trend towards electrical deficit brewing over the horizon as blackouts already hamper the state.

One major cause of the rise in usage of wind and solar power in California is the state’s Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) which requires that by 2030 all “electric load-serving entities” procure 60 percent of their electricity from renewables, and that by 2045 that share becomes 100 percent. Because of this requirement, utilities use far more of these intermittent resources, resources that although “greener” are less reliable, than they otherwise would. To compensate, California cycles their baseload resources up and down as the sun ceases to shine or the wind ceases to blow, making blackouts more likely.

[ … ]

California imported nearly one-third of its electricity from other states in 2018. This is all fine and good when neighboring states have power to spare, but when they don’t their own capacity needs are fulfilled first.

Lambermont concluded with this warning,

If actions are not immediately taken to both keep current reliable baseload capacity, and remove legal limitations on the construction of new ones, both nuclear and natural gas, then California’s current power predicament may become a regular occurrence.

Without a major tidal shift in California energy policy, this problem is not currently destined to right itself.

The Bottom Line

Amazon aims for total carbon neutrality. Apple aims for total carbon neutrality. FedEx plans to replace its entire gas and diesel powered delivery trucks and replace them with electric powered vehicles.  In 2030 Mercedes committed to selling EVs exclusively “where the market allows.” Porsche aims to be totally carbon neutral. In 2025 Jaguar will become an all electric brand. Honda is planning to sell only electric vehicles in America. In 2027 Alfa Romeo plans on selling only electric vehicles in China, Europe and the U.S. In 2035. General Motors pledged to sell only electric vehicles unless “the market demands otherwise” and aims for its global products and operations to be carbon neutral. Mercedes aims to be carbon neutral in 2039. And finally, Ford, Honda, Mazda, Mitsubishi Motors, Subaru, Toyota and the Volkswagen Group aim for total carbon neutrality by 2050.

Do you see where this is all going? 

If you want to destroy an economy, eliminate jobs, stop heating homes, stop manufacturing cars, trucks, and SUVs that use gasoline or diesel fuels, stop flying planes that use jet fuel, stop manufacturing, end farming, stop getting clean water, and all of those related industries, then just go carbon neutral.

Stopping the use of power plants using coal, natural gas and oil will literally shut down America. Our nation will become worse than a third world country, we would return to the stone age before mankind discovered fire.

QUESTION: Is this idea of carbon neutrality good for you and me or bad for you and me?

We will let you make the decision on that. We just provide the facts and truth behind carbon neutrality.

©Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

WORLD RECORD CONVOY: ‘Freedom Rally’ truckers convoy hits Canada against vax mandates thumbnail

WORLD RECORD CONVOY: ‘Freedom Rally’ truckers convoy hits Canada against vax mandates

By The Geller Report

“In Canada we have one of the biggest revolutions happening. Right now there’s 50,000 truckers and 1.4M people headed to the parliament in Ottawa. And they’re going to stay there until Trudeau resigns, or they give us back all of our freedoms and rights.”

National strikes are essential in the pushback against these autocratic, dangerous edicts.

What’s happening in Canada is amazing. Truckers are driving across the country in a massive caravan and freedom loving people are meeting them along the way to cheer them on. This is the type of protest that can be VERY effective. pic.twitter.com/0VqDVdjh9S

— Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) January 25, 2022

From the truckers!!! The truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth. pic.twitter.com/fx9jmGlEAF

— Theo Fleury (@TheoFleury14) January 25, 2022

Crying as I watch footage of the truckers freedom convoy, I am realizing how much trauma our canadian government has caused, continues to cause and how broken I am. It is unforgivable. pic.twitter.com/4fq7p5q8w1

— Unacceptable E-co Fashion 👠 (@EcoFashionByBG) January 24, 2022

Freedom Convoy heading from South Carolina up to Ottawa to stand with us Canadians in ending Mandates! #freedomconvoy #FreedomConvoy2022 #UnitedWeStand #truckers #TruckersForFreedom pic.twitter.com/QQICGBPbDO

— Immortal Indigenous (@misscovurgurll) January 25, 2022

WARMINGTON: ‘Freedom’ truckers may form world’s longest convoy https://t.co/3azEc28kuO Via @joe_warmington pic.twitter.com/8wuQ3SyMgC

— Toronto Sun (@TheTorontoSun) January 26, 2022

‘Freedom Rally’ truckers convoy hits Ontario — picking up Conservative political support as it rolls

En route to Ottawa and expected to arrive Saturday in Ottawa, the convoy has been sparked by government measures to stop unvaccinated truckers from crossing the Canada-U.S. border.

By Alex McKeen, The Star, January 25, 2022:

In Kenora, where the temperature was expected to drop to -27C on Tuesday night, a host of volunteers were preparing to welcome a massive convoy of truckers.

About two dozen people could be seen gathered at a community hub downtown, packing boxes of snacks and making sandwiches, in a video livestreamed to Facebook by a supporter of the “Freedom Rally” — a convoy of truckers and their supporters that has been making its way this week from British Columbia to Ottawa in a protest against COVID-19 vaccine mandates.

As the camera passed by, many at the hub shouted “woohoo, truckers!” and wore food-handling gloves, if no masks.

Kenora was scheduled to be the first Ontario stop for the controversial convoy.

The organizer who posted the video told the Star she was “so beyond stoked” that the truckers were coming to the town of about 15,000 people, where according to Statistics Canada data about nine per cent of residents work in the trucking industry themselves.

That organizer then stated that she and everyone supporting the convoy have been told not to speak to the media because “too much smearing of this and not the truth being told.” A second organizer confirmed that the Kenora supporters had been asked by convoy organizers not to speak to media.

Supporters of truck drivers protesting the COVID-19 vaccine mandate cheer on a convoy of trucks on their way to Ottawa, on the Trans-Canada Highway west of Winnipeg on Jan. 25.

Kelli Saunders, meanwhile, had found a parking spot with her husband close to the Trans-Canada Highway, where the truckers would be rolling by. She said they were ready, with homemade signs and five layers of clothing, to go outside and cheer.

“Kenora is located right on the Trans-Canada, between Winnipeg and Thunder Bay. We’re a main thoroughfare,” she said. “Truckers, we see them all the time, they’re just part of the community.”

Saunders said she herself has lost a job due to vaccine mandates, and she supports the truckers’ message.

“This has been a hard two years for everyone. It’s been extremely mentally draining,” she said. “I’m really proud of this group of truckers and the way Canada has come together along the route to support them.”

Not everyone in the town was packing food and supplies.

Leslei Scott, who said she lives just 20 metres from the highway, had no plans to go out to watch the convoy, and not just because it was “too damn cold,” though that was certainly a factor.

“People have been used to an amazing life with certain freedoms … but during a pandemic the government has the ability to alter them,” she said. “I think they are protesting whatever the government is mandating them to do, be it vaccines or other.”

En route to Ottawa and expected to arrive Saturday, the convoy has been sparked by government measures to stop unvaccinated truckers from crossing the Canada-U.S. border — and has grown into a conservative movement opposing other COVID-19 restrictions put in place by Justin Trudeau’s Liberal government.

Conservative politicians and Canadian volunteers opposed to vaccine mandates are throwing their support behind the growing group of vehicles, which was reported to be 20 kilometres long as it worked its way through Saskatchewan and Manitoba on Tuesday.

As the convoy entered the province where its main protest will take place, its role as a litmus test for Canadians’ views on the pandemic, two years in, was on full display.

RELATED ARTICLES:

The Truckers Are Coming: World Record Caravan Heads to Mandate-Imposing Tyrants

Canadian truckers receive support from Maine

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Quick note: Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here. We will not waver. We will not tire. We will not falter, and we will not fail. Freedom will prevail.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here — it’s free and it’s critical NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America’s survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow me on Gettr. I am there, click here. It’s open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

SISSY WATCH USA: Scott Kirby, CEO of United Airlines thumbnail

SISSY WATCH USA: Scott Kirby, CEO of United Airlines

By Dr. Rich Swier

After writing our column “America’s Sissy Problem” we decided to take the next step and identify influential sissies in America. Our first American Sissy Watch USA winner is John “Scott” Kirby.

John Scott Kirby is an American executive currently serving as CEO of United Airlines. He previously served as President of US Airways and American Airlines, as well as President of United Airlines from 2016 to 2020, when he was promoted as CEO.

Holly Hegeman, wrote in PlaneBuzz this about Scott Kirby:

More Scary Photos: Guess Who

It’s clearly a year for major Halloween cross-dressing on the part of airline execs.

Can you guess who these two lovelies are? Yes, that’s right. The Captain and Tennille. Kind of. Sort of.

All I have to say is that US Airways’ President Scott Kirby makes one ugly woman. (The Captain? That’s SVP of Corporate Culture, HR, Dog Catching and whatever else her title includes — Elise Eberwein.)

I guess Love Will Keep Them Together. (Anyone for a little Muskrat Love?)  Nice legs Scott.

Click here to see Scott Kirby in drag.

But Scott Kirby isn’t the only airline executive who cross-dresses. Holly Hegeman, wrote in PlaneBuzz about Southwest Airlines CEO Gary Kelly. Gary Kelly was our first runner up for Sissy Watch.

It’s Halloween. BOO!

For at least two airlines — that means it is time to get scary.

Especially for some of the airlines’ top executives.

Friday over on Denton Drive here in Dallas, it appears that Southwest Airlines‘ former Chairman and CEO Herb Kelleher decided to go with the Willie Nelson/Biker combo look, while current Chairman, President and CEO Gary Kelly pranced down the Yellow Brick Road as Dorothy.

I don’t know what it is with Gary and his cross-dressing tendencies, but ever since he turned out as Edna Turnblad a couple of years ago — we’re almost afraid to look. (Last year Gary and two associates were attired as ZZ Top.) Early betting this year had Gary dressing as Julia Child.

But here’s the one that got me. Anyone know who that is?

That’s US Airways’ COO Robert Isom. I tell you what — that boy has the Barry Gibb thing going, doesn’t he? I hear he hit some pretty high notes Friday as well — as the US Airways’ executive team, aka the Bee Gees, entertained airline employees at the airline’s headquarters in Tempe.

Gotta love that hair.

Click here to view the image of Gary Kelly, CEO of Southwest Airlines cross-dressed as Dorothy

It seem that Scott is not only into cross-dressing he’s also all-in on vaxx mandates.

In a Fox News article titled “United Airlines pilot says she’s blocked from finding job or accessing 401k for refusing vaccine reported:

United Airlines captain who is on unpaid leave for not complying with her company’s vaccine mandate says she has been locked out of her 401(k) and is prohibited from finding another job.

“I am out on unpaid leave. I am prohibited from getting another job. I’m prohibited from accessing my 401(k). I have no medical benefits, and I’m leading the charge in this fight, so my days are consumed,” United pilot Sherry Walker, co-founder of Airline Employees 4 Health Freedom, told the Daily Signal while attending the “Defeat the Mandates” march in Washington, D.C., on Sunday.

Sherry Walker, co-founder of @AE4HF, tells @DailySignal she is a captain for United Airlines: “I am out on unpaid leave, I am prohibited from getting another job, I am prohibited from accessing my 401k, I have no medical benefits, and I’m leading the charge in this fight.” pic.twitter.com/xZxUxuBk9f

— Mary Margaret Olohan (@MaryMargOlohan) January 23, 2022

Under Scott, United Airlines has also gone woke. Watch as Tucker Carlson sounds off on United Airlines latest ‘gender, racial’ quota:

The Bottom Line

Sissy Watch USA is dedicated to exposing the sissies among us. We will expose pederast priests, bishops, cardinals, pedophile politicians, corporate CEOs and of course cross dressers.

Why are we doing this? Because someone has too. 

Our role is to present the facts and let our readers make up their own minds.

If you have a sissy you would like us to highlight please leave the information in the comments section below.

Thanks for reading our inaugural Sissy Watch USA column.

©Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

Abortion Is a Spiritual Battle thumbnail

Abortion Is a Spiritual Battle

By Jerry Newcombe

A national group of Satanists is putting their cards on the table.  They are opposing abortion restrictions and adamantly defending abortion as worship of their god.

Meanwhile, a group of liberal pastors in Maine claims that abortion can supposedly be the Christian thing to do. In an op-ed in the Bangor Daily News, “Why a Christian minister supports abortion rights,” their leader writes of the importance of “reproductive justice.”

Abortion is a spiritual battle. So what does the Bible have to say abortion?

I write this shortly after the 49th anniversary of Roe v. Wade (and its companion decision, Doe v. Bolton) of January 22, 1973, that gave us abortion on demand. And here we are 63 million abortions later. That’s nothing to celebrate—but much to mourn.

Psalm 106:37 speaks of a time of disobedient Israelites, noting, “They sacrificed their sons and their daughters to false gods. They shed innocent blood…and the land was desecrated by their blood. They defiled themselves by what they did.”

Did Christ ever address abortion? Not directly. But note how His brilliant statement on human relations, the Golden Rule (Matthew 7:12), has direct application to the subject of abortion.

“So whatever you wish that others would do to you, do also to them,” He said in the Sermon on the Mount. You were once an unborn baby. Would you have wanted your mother to kill you in utero? The majority of those mothers feel forced, against their will, to abort.

When Ronald Reagan was running for president in 1980, he was asked why he wasn’t “pro-choice.” He responded, “I’ve noticed that everyone who is for abortion has already been born.” Touché.

Dr. D. James Kennedy once said, “If you’re pro-choice, you should get down on your knees and thank God that you’re mother wasn’t pro-choice.”

Some people say that abortion doesn’t kill human beings. And yet everything you and I are—our sex, how tall we will be, the color of our eyes—all of these things were determined at the moment of conception.

And from conception to birth, it’s all one continuous period of growth. The Mayo Clinic documents the humanity and growth of the preborn baby in the womb until birth.

We look back at previous generations, and we say, “How could they have been slave-owners?” Well, I believe future generations will look back at us and ask, “How could they have been so complacent about abortion—especially when they had 3-D sonograms, giving them a window to the womb?”

Many times when a pregnant woman contemplating an abortion gets to see the sonogram of her unborn baby, she changes her mind.

David states in Psalm 139, “For you created my inmost being, you knit me together in my mother’s womb. I praise you, because I am fearfully and wonderfully made. Your works are wonderful, I know that full well. My frame was not hidden from you when I was made in the secret place. When I was woven together in the depths of the earth, your eyes saw my unformed body. All the days ordained for me were written in your book before one of them came to be.”

The prophet Jeremiah says this in the very opening of his book: “The word of the Lord came to me saying, ‘Before I formed you in the womb, I knew you. Before you were born, I set you apart. I appointed you as a prophet to the nations.’” So, here’s this little unborn baby being appointed a prophet of the nations by God Himself.

Jumping ahead to the New Testament, in Luke 1, we read of two pregnant relatives visiting with each other. Elizabeth, who was pregnant with John the Baptist, and Mary, who was pregnant with Jesus. Elizabeth says, “As soon as the sound of your greeting reached my ears, the baby in my womb leaped for joy.” Baby? The Greek word in Luke 1 is brephos, which means baby.

Luke 2:12 says: “The angels told the shepherds, ‘This will be a sign to you: You will find a baby wrapped in cloths and lying in a manger.’” The same word, brephos, is used there. Thus, whether in English or in Greek, the word baby is used for born and unborn alike.

The Bible also says that God has made human beings in His image. He has made us a “little lower than the angels” (Psalm 8:5). But many people today believe that we’re essentially “a little higher than the apes.” As the abortion ethic has spread in our culture, like a cancer, it has cheapened human life all the way around.

It’s time we follow the Biblical ethic and treat the unborn as we ourselves would want to be treated. Let them live.

©Jerry Newcombe. All rights reserved.

VIDEO: ‘Skin On Fire’ an Exposé on topical steroid creams by Dr. Marvin Rapaport thumbnail

VIDEO: ‘Skin On Fire’ an Exposé on topical steroid creams by Dr. Marvin Rapaport

By Linda Goudsmit

The video Skin on Fire is a very accurate description of the pain and suffering caused by the ongoing over-prescribing and use of topical steroid creams. Most people have no idea that it is the steroids – not eczema – that is the causing their relentless skin problems. My husband’s skin was CURED using Marvin’s protocol of total topical steroid withdrawal.

This is part of an email I sent to Dr. Rapoport thanking him for being a maverick in dermatology, and for the extraordinary interview I watched when researching “incurable/chronic” rashes. It changed our lives. We have become very good friends and I want to help him spread his important message of hope and health.

PCH Films posted this about their video Skin on Fire:

Through the heartbreaking, inspiring stories of diverse individuals who have suffered from a painful medical condition called Topical Steroid Withdrawal Syndrome (TSWS), SKIN ON FIRE shows their suffering is undoubtedly from a legitimate condition, and the respected medical experts who weigh in offer viewers a better understanding of why someone may develop TSWS, what can be done to prevent it, and what new treatments may be on the horizon.

RELATED VIDEO: Questions and Answers with Marvin J. Rapaport, M.D.

EDITORS NOTE: Visit the film’s website to learn more: https://www.skinonfiredoc.com

©PCH Films. All rights reserved.

OSHA Pulls Private Vaccine Mandate After Supreme Court Loss thumbnail

OSHA Pulls Private Vaccine Mandate After Supreme Court Loss

By The Daily Caller

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) will withdraw a rule mandating that private businesses with more than 100 employees require that they be vaccinated against COVID-19 or undergo weekly testing against the virus.

OSHA will formally withdraw the rule on Wednesday, according to a document published Tuesday in an advanced version of the Federal Register. The rule, announced in November by President Joe Biden, was immediately challenged by several states and private companies, and the Supreme Court issued a stay on Jan. 13 while federal appeals courts consider its legality.

“After evaluating the Court’s decision, OSHA is withdrawing the Vaccination and Testing ETS as an enforceable emergency temporary standard,” the agency wrote in the Register.

The OSHA announcement was first reported by Bloomberg Law.

#Covid-19 Shot-or-Test Regulation to be Withdrawn by #Biden’s #OSHA https://t.co/fd6uJk6Juh

— Bruce Rolfsen (@OSHAReporter) January 25, 2022

When he announced the rule, Biden argued that it would reduce the spread of COVID-19 by increasing the number of Americans who received vaccinations against the virus. Vaccines are less effective at reducing the spread of the newly-dominant Omicron variant, although they are still effective at preventing hospitalization and death.

“Some of the biggest companies are already requiring this,” Biden said in defending the rule. “United Airlines, Disney, Tyson food and even Fox News.”

However, OSHA suspended the rule’s enforcement in November, after the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a stay. It never went back into effect.

Other portions of the Biden administration’s vaccine mandate plan have also been held up. A federal judge in Texas issued an injunction on Friday preventing the government from mandating that all federal employees and contractors receive COVID-19 vaccines. The judge, Jeffrey Brown, ruled that Biden could not issue such a mandate “with the stroke of a pen and without the input of Congress.”

Several lower court judges also blocked the federal government’s vaccine mandate for healthcare workers whose employers receive Medicare and Medicaid funds. However, the Supreme Court ruled that that mandate can remain in effect while its legality is debated at lower courts.

COLUMN BY

MICHAEL GINSBERG

Congressional reporter.

RELATED ARTICLE: Supreme Court Blocks Biden’s Vaccine-Or-Testing Rule For Businesses, Allows Healthcare Worker Mandate To Move Forward

TAKE ACTION: Tell the NCAA Only Biological Women Can Compete in Women’s Sports thumbnail

TAKE ACTION: Tell the NCAA Only Biological Women Can Compete in Women’s Sports

By Florida Family Association


Click here to send your email to urge the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Board of Governors to correct its error by changing policy to require that naturally born males only compete athletically as males and naturally born females compete athletically only as females and to reclassify trans sports records out of the male and female categories.


To see this alert in your internet browser and share this article click here.

National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) policy allows males who undergo testosterone suppression to compete athletically as females.  However, studies show that testosterone suppression does NOT make a level playing field for men to compete against women.

The New York Post reports:

Michael Phelps: NCAA’s Lia Thomas issue shows need for level playing field.

Thomas, a transgender swimmer on the women’s team at the University of Pennsylvania, competed for three years as a male. NCAA bylaws permit transgender athletes to compete as women if they have undergone testosterone suppression for a year.

Thomas has been demolishing female competition. There is a chance she could not only win national championships, but compete for all-time NCAA records set by Olympic gold medalists Missy Franklin and Katie Ledecky.

None of Thomas’ teammates have spoken on the record about their opinion on the matter, though some have chosen to do so anonymously to voice their concerns.

“She compares herself to Jackie Robinson. She said she is like the Jackie Robinson of trans sports,” one of Thomas’ teammates told the Washington Examiner last week. “She laughs about it and mocks the situation. Instead of caring or showing that she cares about what she’s doing or what she’s doing to her teammates, she’s not sympathetic or empathetic at all. Lia never addressed our team. She never asked if it was OK. She never asked how we felt. She never tried to explain how she feels. She never has said anything to us as a group. She never addressed anything.”

Policy allowing males to compete athletically as females based on testosterone suppression does not change men into women nor make men physically equal to women.

The National Institute of Health reports:

The muscular advantage enjoyed by transgender women is only minimally reduced when testosterone is suppressed.  

report that the performance gap between males and females becomes significant at puberty and often amounts to 10-50% depending on sport. The performance gap is more pronounced in sporting activities relying on muscle mass and explosive strength, particularly in the upper body. Longitudinal studies examining the effects of testosterone suppression on muscle mass and strength in transgender women consistently show very modest changes, where the loss of lean body mass, muscle area and strength typically amounts to approximately 5% after 12 months of treatment. Thus, the muscular advantage enjoyed by transgender women is only minimally reduced when testosterone is suppressed. Sports organizations should consider this evidence when reassessing current policies regarding participation of transgender women in the female category of sport.

The Guardian reports:

Trans women retain 12% edge in tests two years after transitioning, study finds:

A groundbreaking new study on transgender athletes has found trans women retain a 12% advantage in running tests even after taking hormones for two years to suppress their testosterone. The results, researchers suggest, indicate the current International Olympic Committee guidelines may give trans women an “unfair competitive advantage” over biological women.

The research, published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine, found that before starting their hormone treatment trans women performed 31% more push-ups and 15% more sit-ups in one minute on average than a biological women younger than 30 in the air force – and ran 1.5 miles 21% faster.

Yet after suppressing their testosterone for two years – a year longer than IOC guidelines – they were still 12% faster on average than biological females.

The trans women also retained a 10% advantage in push-ups and a 6% advantage in sit-ups for the first two years after taking hormones, before their advantage disappeared. But the researchers say they “may underestimate the advantage in strength that trans women have over cis women … because trans women will have a higher power output than cis women when performing an equivalent number of push-ups”.

Male athletes pretending to be females are demoralizing girls and ruining women’s sports.  Woke leftists demand that a made up, unnatural, unscientific identity that allegedly makes up .58 percent of the population should be allowed to destroy decades of sports competition by real women who make up 50.52 percent of the population.  This unfairness is grossly disproportional against women.  Testosterone suppression simply cannot restore fairness and safety by having men compete against women.

The leaders of our colleges have been the guardians and custodians of science and history for centuries.  Science and history have supported the sexual differences of male and female for hundreds of years.  Tragically, collegiate leaders succumbed to LGBTQ harassment and wokeness by allowing males to compete athletically against females.

Florida Family Association has prepared an email for you to send to urge the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Board of Governors to correct its error by changing policy to require that naturally born males only compete athletically as males and naturally born females compete athletically only as females and to reclassify trans sports records out of the male and female athletic sports categories.

To send your email, please click the following link, enter your name and email address then click the “Send Your Message” button. You may also edit the subject or message text if you wish.


Click here to send your email to urge the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Board of Governors to correct its error by changing policy to require that naturally born males only compete athletically as males and naturally born females compete athletically only as females and to reclassify trans sports records out of the male and female categories.


For Contact information click here.

EDITORS NOTE: This Florida Family Association column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.