Military Documents About Gain of Function Contradict Fauci Testimony Under Oath thumbnail

Military Documents About Gain of Function Contradict Fauci Testimony Under Oath

/in , , , , /by

By Editorial Staff

  • Military documents state that EcoHealth Alliance approached DARPA in March 2018 seeking funding to conduct gain of function research of bat borne coronaviruses. The proposal, named Project Defuse, was rejected by DARPA over safety concerns and the notion that it violates the gain of function research moratorium.
  • The main report regarding the EcoHealth Alliance proposal leaked on the internet a couple of months ago, it has remained unverified until now. Project Veritas has obtained a separate report to the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, written by U.S. Marine Corp Major, Joseph Murphy, a former DARPA Fellow.
  • “The proposal does not mention or assess potential risks of Gain of Function (GoF) research,” a direct quote from the DARPA rejection letter.
  • Project Veritas reached out to DARPA for comment regarding the hidden documents and spoke with the Chief of Communications, Jared Adams, who said, “It doesn’t sound normal to me,” when asked about the way the documents were buried.

[WASHINGTON, D.C. – Jan. 10, 2022] Project Veritas has obtained startling never-before-seen documents regarding the origins of COVID-19, gain of function research, vaccines, potential treatments which have been suppressed, and the government’s effort to conceal all of this.

The documents in question stem from a report at the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, better known as DARPA, which were hidden in a top-secret shared drive.

DARPA is an agency under the U.S. Department of Defense in charge of facilitating research in technology with potential military applications.

Project Veritas has obtained a separate report to the Inspector General of the Department of Defense written by U.S. Marine Corp Major, Joseph Murphy, a former DARPA Fellow.

The report states that EcoHealth Alliance approached DARPA in March 2018, seeking funding to conduct gain of function research of bat-borne coronaviruses. The proposal, named Project Defuse, was rejected by DARPA over safety concerns and the notion that it violates the basis gain of function research moratorium.

According to the documents, NIAID, under the direction of Dr. Fauci, went ahead with the research in Wuhan, China and at several sites across the U.S.

Dr. Fauci has repeatedly maintained, under oath, that the NIH and NAIAD have not been involved in gain of function research with the EcoHealth Alliance program. But according to the documents obtained by Project Veritas which outline why EcoHealth Alliance’s proposal was rejected, DARPA certainly classified the research as gain of function.

*****

Continue reading this article at Project Veritas.

VIDEO: Military Purge — 18K Discharges? 1000+ Suicides – 77 Covid Deaths thumbnail

VIDEO: Military Purge — 18K Discharges? 1000+ Suicides – 77 Covid Deaths

/in , , , , , /by

By Graham Ledger

The great political purge of the 21st century is in high gear targeting all Americans who say no to the Vax including patriots in the U.S. Military.

But why? Why this political effort to steamroll the Constitutional rights of tens of millions of freedom-loving Americans?

In this edition of the Ledger Report, Graham Ledger reveals the answer as he speaks with Dr. Elizabeth Vliet, President & CEO of Truth for Health Foundation which is attempting to help these patriots in the military protect both their bodies and their God-given rights! 

Please subscribe free to The Ledger Report by clicking here: www.GrahamLedger.com

RELATED ARTICLE: Marines grant two religious exemptions, marking first across military branches

EDITORS NOTE: This The Ledger Report video is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Single Payer: A Toxic Brew of Politics and Medicine thumbnail

Single Payer: A Toxic Brew of Politics and Medicine

/in , , , , , /by

By The Daily Skirmish – Liberato.US

The Left’s dream of socialized medicine is still kicking around.  The Left has been salivating for single payer for a hundred years, and they’re not about to give up now.

A single payer healthcare proposal made it out of a committee in California’s legislative Assembly earlier this week.  Governor Gavin Newsom campaigned on single payer in 2018, but a separate measure would have to be put to the voters to fund the gargantuan program with huge tax increases.  Even then, the tax increases being proposed would only bring in less than half of what single payer was estimated to cost when it was considered in 2018.  Unsurprisingly, there are no cost estimates this time, because the idea was shelved in 2018 after Californians realized how much it would cost.  The same reality check occurred some years ago in Vermont.  Single payer died there when it became known payroll taxes would have to consume 25 percent of everyone’s paycheck to pay for it.

The radical California Nurses Association is pushing single payer, holding a ‘Day of Action’ in 15 California cities last Saturday.   Leftists elsewhere in the country also continue to agitate for single payer.  A nationwide march for single payer was also held last Saturday in all 50 states.   Far-left publications recently urged their readers to continue to fight for single payer, although the publications are split on whether to fight at the national or state level.  The Yale School of Medicine ran an editorial praising single payer and the resolution New Haven passed last August supporting Medicare for All for the entire country.

Similar resolutions passed in several New Jersey cities and Duluth last year.  Single payer proposals are also kicking around in New York, Oregon, and Ohio.  The idea has not been abandoned at the national level, either.  Joe Biden’s Build Back Better proposal would put more building blocks in place by creating a public option for health insurance, increasing Obamacare subsidies, and ramping up Medicaid.  Critics say this is just a stone’s throw away from single payer.

But no matter how you get there, single payer is still a bad idea.  The stratospheric cost is reason enough to oppose single payer, not to mention the experience of the National Health System in Britain which shows such programs are continually broke and always pleading for more money.  There’s never enough money for single payer and, when more money isn’t forthcoming, single payer is forced to ration your healthcare even more than it usually does.  Long wait times and rationing, that’s the fate of anyone on single payer.  It takes three years to get a tooth removed in Britain.  Is that what you want?

Horror stories about rationing and long waits are familiar.  But there’s another aspect of single payer that’s just as insidious that doesn’t get nearly enough attention.  Healthcare would become completely politicized under single payer and, if private medicine is banned, you won’t have anywhere else to go.  Look what’s happened recently in the pandemic.  The federal government told Florida to pound Daytona Beach sand when the state asked for more monoclonal antibody treatments.    The Woke FDA is saying life-saving COVID treatments should be doled out based on skin color.  That’s despicable.  We also have the spectacle of public health authorities falling all over themselves lately to tell everyone they need an N95 mask.   Maryland’s going to give out 20 million of them.  In case you haven’t figured it out yet, what this really means is everything you’ve been told about cloth masks for the last two years has been a lie – that cloth masks work and should be mandated.  You’ve been fed a line of bull for political reasons.   What do you think’s going to happen when the government gets its hands on all of healthcare under single payer?   Every single aspect of medicine will become politicized.  You will be told what healthcare you can have and no more.  You will be told how to behave and what rules you must obey in order to get it.  Too bad for you if Washington decides it doesn’t like your diet or your lifestyle choices.  When rationing isn’t enough, we will have to bring the hammer down to make sure you don’t cost the government too much money for your healthcare.

And, of course, the politicians who pass single payer and implement it will exempt themselves from whatever rules they impose on the rest of us.  That’s what happened in Obamacare with the congressional exemption.  It’ll happen again in spades if you fall for single payer.  You’ve been warned.

Visit The Daily Skirmish

©Christopher Wrights. All rights reserved.

VIDEO: All Trails Lead to Cardona in Parents-as-Terrorist Flap thumbnail

VIDEO: All Trails Lead to Cardona in Parents-as-Terrorist Flap

/in , , , , /by

By Family Research Council

For Joe Biden, the uproar his administration caused by calling parents “domestic terrorists” has been a controversy he never could shake. Since October, when Attorney General Merrick Garland threatened to sic the FBI on moms and dads who spoke up at school board meetings, the administration has been on the losing side of a very public PR battle. Now, the optics are worse. Just how much collusion was there between the administration and the National School Board Association (NSBA) in the weeks leading up to the letter? A lot more, it turns out, than any of us were led to believe.

When the firestorm started, it didn’t take long for the NSBA to walk their letter back — revealing that a number of their leaders had no idea it had been sent in the first place. There “was no justification for some of the language included in the letter,” the group said. “We should have had a better process in place to allow for consultation on a communication of this significance.” Garland, to most people’s surprise, stood by his memo, insisting to angry Republicans in the House and Senate that the DOJ’s overreaction was perfectly justified. Education Secretary Miguel Cardona, meanwhile, continued to feign ignorance.

Now, thanks to new emails just released as part of a parents’ group Freedom of Information Act request, we know that the president’s top educator had at least some knowledge of the letter beforehand. In an October 5th email, NSBA Secretary-Treasurer Kristi Swett remembered that NSBA interim CEO Chip Slaven “told the officers he was writing a letter to provide information to the White House, from a request by Secretary Cardona.” Slaven himself told the others that he’d been in talks “over the last several weeks with White House staff” who had “requested additional information on some of the specific threats.”

It’s a damning picture for the Biden administration, who has insisted for months that it didn’t coordinate the attack on parents. As usual, the president’s team has tried to lie itself out of the crisis, insisting as recently as the last 24 hours that Cardona had nothing to do with it. “While the Secretary did not solicit a letter from NSBA, to understand the views and concerns of stakeholders, the Department routinely engages with students, teachers, parents, district leaders and education associations,” a spokesperson said.

House Republicans don’t buy it — or, at the very least, want to hear from Cardona’s own lips. In a letter to the secretary’s office, Congresswoman Mary Miller (R-Ill.) is demanding answers to very basic questions by this Friday. For instance, “Did you speak to anyone at NSBA about the September 29 letter before it was sent?” Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-N.C.) piled on, calling for immediate hearings. “It is abundantly clear to me that Secretary Cardona must answer to the Education and Labor Committee, Congress on the whole, and especially the American people.”

At the end of the day, Miller said, “[Cardona needs to] testify under oath so we can find out the truth. My experience with him is he knows how to wiggle and pivot and possibly even lie… [T]his is as an outrageous claim, and we need to know from him what actually happened. I don’t think we should let this go any farther. What’s happening in our country is outrageous.”

Asked if she was surprised that Biden’s administration was targeting everyday Americans, Miller said, “Yes… but I’d like to return the surprise to them. I want Americans to wake up and fight back and quit being passive. Get off the sidelines. The schools belong to us. We fund them. Those are our children and the schools are accountable to us. We want transparency in the curriculum. We want accountability. We don’t want D.C. elites telling us how to raise our children and how to live.”

EDITORS NOTE: This FRC-Action column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Supreme Court HALTS Biden COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate for Businesses thumbnail

Supreme Court HALTS Biden COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate for Businesses

/in , , , , , /by

By The Geller Report

EUREKA! Finally! Sanity!

Supreme Court Halts Biden COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate for Businesses

By: Newsmax, 13 January 2022:

The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday blocked President Joe Biden’s pandemic-related vaccination-or-testing mandate for large businesses at a time of escalating COVID-19 infections while allowing his administration to enforce its separate vaccine requirement for healthcare facilities.

The court acted after hearing arguments last Friday in the legal fight over temporary mandates issued in November by two federal agencies aimed at increasing U.S. vaccination rates and making workplaces and healthcare settings safer. The cases tested presidential powers to address a swelling public health crisis that already has killed more than 845,000 Americans.

The court was divided in both cases. The court ruled 6-3 with the six conservative justices in the majority and three liberal justices dissenting in blocking the broader workplace ruling. The vote was 5-4 to allow the healthcare worker rule, with two conservatives, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh, joining the liberals in the majority.

The federal workplace safety agency issued a rule affecting businesses with at least 100 workers requiring vaccines or weekly COVID-19 tests – a policy applying to more than 80 million employees. Challengers led by the state of Ohio and a business group asked the justices to block the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) rule after a lower court lifted an injunction against it. Companies were supposed to start showing they were in compliance starting this past Monday.

The high court blocked a Dec. 17 decision by the Cincinnati-based 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that had allowed the mandate to go into effect.

The court’s order blocking enforcement while litigation continues in a lower court likely signals doom for the administration’s attempt to boost vaccination numbers by harnessing federal powers to protect workplace health and safety. During the oral argument, conservative justices expressed skepticism about the legality of that approach.

The other mandate required vaccination for an estimated 10.3 million workers at about 76,000 healthcare facilities including hospitals and nursing homes that accept money from the Medicare and Medicaid government health insurance programs for elderly, disabled and low-income Americans.

The justices lifted orders by federal judges in Missouri and Louisiana blocking the policy in 24 states, allowing the administration to enforce it nearly nationwide. Enforcement was blocked in Texas by a lower court in separate litigation not at issue in the case before the Supreme Court.

Workers must be vaccinated by the end of February under the mandate.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Break out your tinfoil hat: leaders now admit Covid-19 hospitalisations have been inflated

NEWLY RELEASED MILITARY DOCS: Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin Were Effective In Treating COVID Was Hidden By Bureaucrats

MSNBC Demands Unvaccinated Americans Should Be Taxed HIGHER

Supreme Court blocks Biden Covid vaccine mandate for businesses, allows health-care worker rule

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Quick note: Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here. We will not waver. We will not tire. We will not falter, and we will not fail. Freedom will prevail.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here — it’s free and it’s critical NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America’s survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow me on Gettr. I am there, click here. It’s open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

If Limiting the Unvaxxed is Wise, What About Limiting Fat People? thumbnail

If Limiting the Unvaxxed is Wise, What About Limiting Fat People?

/in , , , , /by

By Selwyn Duke

For the record, I’ve nothing against our friendly-fronted friends. Why, my favorite philosopher, G.K. Chesterton, reportedly weighed in at close to 400 pounds. Yet the reality is that the horizontally challenged have something in common with the “unvaccinated.”

The latter are now today’s lepers, attaining this status via refusal to accept experimental mRNA therapy agents (MTAs, a.k.a. “vaccines”) designed to prevent something they don’t prevent. In fact, many Branch COVIDians talk about making “vaccine passports” a requirement for “participation in society.”

This is already happening to an extent in Australia, the Land Down Under — COVID tyranny. For example, Australia’s Northern Territory announced new draconian lockdown restrictions last week, with the MTA-resistant especially targeted.

Never mind that Lord Fauci the Infallible and other health oracles once said, implying it was quite the mountain to climb, that a 70 to 80 percent “vaccination” rate would suffice to deliver herd immunity, and Australia now has a 91 percent rate among people over 12.

But, hey, they just need to get that rate up to 154 percent and it’ll be shrimp-on-the-barbie and Foster’s time once again. Don’t say its impossible, either, because Democrat counties often prove the achievability of such numbers with voter turnouts at election time. You just have to “vaccinate” those recently dead Australians, mate, to be fair dinkum safe — and forbid casket exiting and midnight zombie romps for the foreseeable future.

Anyway, “There are only three reasons to leave the home now, not five,” said Northern Territory chief minister Michael Gunner last Monday, explaining the COVIDian establishment of (dark) religion. “Work is not a reason to leave the home for the unvaccinated,” he continued, elaborating on the limitations. “The chief health officer has also determined that restriction of movement is critical right now and that one hour of exercise for the next four days is not essential.”

This is despite the fact that most coronavirus transmission occurs indoors and that adequate sunlight exposure reduces one’s chance of infection and serious illness.

Gunner also stated (video below) that you “may only leave home for three reasons — medical treatment, including Covid testing or vaccination — for essential goods and services, like groceries, power tokens, and medications – [and] to provide care or support to a family member or person who cannot support themselves.” Ja, mein Führer!

Gunner is the poster boy for why insurrection was invented. He’s also quite dull, incorrectly claiming that the MTA-resistant are at “greater risk” of catching the China virus. He further stated that such people are more likely to require medical care, and this concern — that the MTA-resistant will clog up hospitals — is currently a major justification for compelling the jab now that many health authorities (e.g., Fauci) have confessed that the shot doesn’t prevent SARS-CoV-2 transmission and contraction.

But consider the implications of the underlying principle, which is: “You have no right to make a life choice that increases the probability you’ll strain the medical system.” What of the plumper among us?

It’s not just that the overweight or obese have constituted 78 percent of China virus deaths, but that such stature is associated with a higher incidence of a host of illnesses. So should the portly be limited in how much food they may buy and what kind? Should they be forced to exercise? They’re costing us all money, you know.

I’m being facetious, of course, but this mentality could be applied to anyone who’s seen as playing fast and loose with his health, such as smokers and sedentary thin individuals who happen to scarf down artery-clogging food.

For that matter, what if it’s learned that the promiscuous and people engaging in certain sexually anomalous behaviors inordinately burden the healthcare system? Well, I guess some things are worth the money — such as our ruling class’s favorite hobbies.

And, hey, if we weren’t distracted with the mob-catalyzing misdirection that is the blaming of the MTA-resistant, we might notice what our ruling class is actually doing.

Contact Selwyn Duke, follow him on MeWe or Parler, or log on to SelwynDuke.com.

©Selwyn Duke. All rights reserved.

Arizona Supreme Court Explains Voids of State Vaccination, Mask Ban Laws thumbnail

Arizona Supreme Court Explains Voids of State Vaccination, Mask Ban Laws

/in , , /by

By Cole Lauterbach

Arizona’s high court has elaborated on their decision to void additions to the most-recent state budget, saying lawmakers ran afoul of provisions in the state constitution meant to simplify legislation.

Justices released their unanimous opinion Thursday [January 6] in Arizona School Boards Association et al. v. State of Arizona. The ruling, initially announced in September, affirmed a lower court ruling that said the Legislature went against two parts of the Arizona Constitution.

The opinion nullifies the state’s ban on mask mandates in schools, laws shoring up local election security and other laws justices concluded had little to do with the state budget.

The constitution’s “title provision” says lawmakers cannot include extemporaneous provisions into a proposal that doesn’t relate to the topic it’s named after. Should those extra facets of a bill be struck down by the court, the rest of the bill would stand.

“Although the bills’ challenged sections may superficially relate to those subjects, this does not satisfy the requisite inquiry,” the opinion read. “Contrary to the State’s claim, a closer examination of the challenged sections manifests the disconnect between the titles and the substantive provisions.”

Justices ruled portions of House Bill 2898, Senate Bill 1824, Senate Bill 1825 and Senate Bill 1819 violate the title requirement.

Justices said the Legislature titled these bills as “appropriation” and “budget reconciliation” or “budget procedure” provisions but have sections that are entirely unrelated to those issues.

The constitutional “one-subject rule” requires legislation to stick to one realm of law. If a bill is struck down under this provision, the entire law is struck down. This is the challenge plaintiffs alleged the state was guilty of “log-rolling” several non-budgetary laws into one bill.

The court found SB 1819, which contained 52 different sections, was unconstitutional under this rule.

“Our conclusion is inescapable: SB 1819 contains an array of discordant subjects that are not reasonably connected to one general idea, and certainly not to budget procedures,” the opinion read.

The state warned that nullifying any of the provisions retrospectively could open the state to challenges regarding previous years’ budgets. Justices disagreed, saying the challenges wouldn’t stand up to long-spent funds.

*****

This article was published by The Center Square and is reproduced with permission.

A Stand in the Park: Resistance in the UK for 2022 thumbnail

A Stand in the Park: Resistance in the UK for 2022

/in , , , , /by

By Shirley Edwards

“For freedom, Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore, and do not submit again to a yoke of slavery.” – Galatians 5:1

It was a typical icy cold and damp early January morning as I walked through the frozen mud to the band stand at the centre of my local park.

On this occasion I was not going to listen to the usual brass band which would sometimes leisurely play there, but I was there to meet a group of complete strangers who have been meeting each Sunday morning in parks across the UK and around the world, to stand up peaceably for freedom, jobs, small businesses, against lockdowns, harmful laws and against people behind ‘The Great Reset’.

Home – A Stand in The Park

As I secretly prayed, I would not slip over as I observed them all watching me make my way over to them in extremely unsuitable footwear, my nerves slowly subsided as I walked up the steps and was met with a friendly and mask less welcome and even a hug from a group of men and women who were all extremely different in terms of their age and profession yet united in their concerns at the tyranny which is currently taking place in our world.

As we huddled under the canopy exchanging thoughts and ideas, I spoke to a beautiful young woman who was about to lose her job in the NHS (National Health Service) because she did not want to take a vaccination.

Like me she did not work in a patient facing environment, but her mere presence on the hospital grounds where she worked rendered her a danger to others.   She had been notified that she had to have the first injection by the beginning of February and then the second injection by April if she wanted to keep her job.

At the hospital where I work, which is a mental health site, health care workers, have been notified of the same.   However, they have been told other non- patient facing roles would be sought for them, and if not suitable, dismissal is their option.   I cannot imagine how they must feel after having studied and committed themselves to a profession which is often a ‘calling’ for them to help and heal others.

Over the last two years I have observed some of those staff leave their families and turn up each day to care for the sick.   There are obviously good and bad staff; but it is certain, it is not an easy job.   Our government who originally promoted the celebration of their dedication and loyalty, by encouraging its citizens to stand on the streets and applaud them have now betrayed and rejected them.

Instead of ‘saving the NHS’, the organization as reported by the Department of Health and Social Care, is set to lose around 126,000 medical staff in April this year.   This, together with the absences which are recorded due to isolating as an outcome of a positive test or a family member having a positive result, means that the service is collapsing.  This will affect all citizens who access the health service for other minor and very serious issues.  They will be at risk.

NHS100k is an initiative set up in November 2021 by a group of frontline ambulance staff who respect freedom of choice and wish to connect 100,000 health and social care staff who will lose their jobs by April 2022.

Reference from NHS100k is also made to Dr. Sam White who was a GP suspended by the NHS for speaking out about informed consent, the safety of the vaccine and other safe and effective treatments.  Dr. White has recently succeeded in winning a high court battle for freedom of speech after he was ordered not to make comments about anything to do with Covid!

It is reported:

Dr. White is finally free to share the peer reviewed literature he has been saving since his social media ban and his focus will be on protecting children from the experimental mRNA vaccines made by Pfizer and Moderna, as they can cause myocarditis.

As we made our way from the band stand to a local coffee shop I listened to the many divisions and arguments which had been created and experienced within the workplace and the home.   The group were extremely aware and well informed of the not-so-subtle brain-washing and relentless propaganda which had taken place in order to create such division.  We spoke about The Nuremberg Code, and the cruelty towards patients who had died without their families last Christmas whilst politicians at No 10 Downing Street had reportedly held celebrations.

As we entered the lovely warm coffee shop away from the icy cold band stand, I then found myself sitting with the young NHS worker who was about to lose her job.  We were joined by her husband and two young children.  I asked them if they had a Plan B.  Her husband said they would take one day at a time.  He was re-assuring.   Despite the dilemma I did think how fortunate they were as a family to be on the same page in relation to their views on the situation.

Their little boy who was about five years old started studying my face and asking me questions and telling me all about himself.  He compared our hair colour, his being natural and mine not.   He compared the colour of our eyes, staring deeply into mine, informed me of the number of freckles he had, told me about a scar he possessed and various other statements in a wonderfully free manner.  Their family dog sat under the table looking from one to the other, possibly wondering when the food would be arriving.

Sitting within the warmth of that family I remembered how life should always be for us all.   They made me welcome and it was wonderful to be with them.  A mixture of generations with a deep desire and a love for freedom, free to speak, to look at each other and make factual observations without any fear.

For the sake of the next generation, I believe that whatever our differences we must make a stand in our own way and draw a line in the sand against the impossible restrictions and the mandates which are being forced upon us.

A Stand in the Park which was founded in Sydney Australia by Brady Gunn, who invited people to stand for truth with him, stood alone at first but after three months people joined him.

A Stand in the Park now has 100,000 members who meet in over 1000 parks in 20 countries.

©Shirley Edwards. All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLES:

No 10 partying in lockdown: who enjoyed what and when | Conservatives | The Guardian

Footage reveals No 10 staff joking about ‘Christmas party’ in Downing St last year while under strict COVID rules | Politics News | Sky News

NHS100k.com – Supporting informed consent, freedom of choice and bodily autonomy

Three cheers for Dr Sam – and a judge who backs free speech – The Conservative Woman

VIDEO: Rand Paul Grills Dr. Fauci For Trying To Suppress Lab-Leak Theory thumbnail

VIDEO: Rand Paul Grills Dr. Fauci For Trying To Suppress Lab-Leak Theory

/in , , , /by

By The Daily Caller

White House chief medical adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci and Republican Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul engaged in yet another explosive exchange at a Senate hearing Tuesday.

Fauci and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) director Rochelle Walensky were testifying before the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions about the Biden Administration’s COVID-19 response. Paul began to ask Fauci why he had attempted to suppress the lab-leak theory by dismissing the work of various scientists who were exploring the possibility, and Fauci got fired up in response.

“I think, in usual fashion, Senator, you are distorting everything about me,” Fauci said. “There you go again. You just do the same thing every hearing. You’re absolutely incorrect, as usual, Senator. You are incorrect, almost everything you say—”

Paul interjected that Fauci denies doing so, but that his emails show the truth. He said that Fauci tried to suppress information from scientists from Oxford, Harvard and Stanford who were open to the lab-leak theory.

“You conspired with Peter Daszak, who you communicated with privately, and other members of the scientific community that wrote opinion pieces for Nature,” Paul said. “17 signed a paper that called it conspiracy theory, the idea that the virus could’ve originated in the lab. Do you think words like ‘conspiracy theory’ should be in a scientific paper?”

Paul was referring to emails which show Fauci and colleagues dismissing the lab-leak theory and coordinating to publish articles and make public comments endorsing that view. Scientists from Harvard, Oxford and Stanford who were open to the theory were called “fringe” and dismissed by Fauci allies.

“You keep distorting the truth, it is stunning how you do that,” Fauci replied. “You’re going back to that original discussion when I brought together a group of people to look at every possibility with an open mind. So not only are you distorting it, you are completely turning it around, as you usually do.”

He then insisted that the purpose of the hearing was to discuss pandemic response, not for him to face personal attacks from Paul.

Fauci denied ever calling the lab-leak theory a “conspiracy theory” and argued Paul was distorting his emails. Paul then turned to questioning Fauci’s pandemic response and support for certain vaccine and mask mandates.

Paul accused Fauci of being responsible for the nearly 900,000 coronavirus deaths in the U.S., calling him the “architect” of the government’s pandemic response.

“If you look at everything that I said, you accuse me of in a monolithic way, telling people what they need to do,” Fauci rebutted. “Everything that I have said has been in support of the CDC guidelines: wear a mask, get boosted, get vaccinated—”

Paul interrupted to accuse Fauci of wanting to make his opinion into law via mandates.

Rather than directly answer the questions from Paul, either about the coordination to suppress the lab-leak theory or about his advocacy for mandates, Fauci then pivoted to accusing Paul of attacking him for political reasons.

“What happens when he gets out and accuses me of things that are completely untrue, is that all of a sudden that kindles the crazies out there, and I have threats upon my life, harassment of my family and my children, with obscene phone calls because people are lying about me.”

Fauci then appeared to blame Paul for instigating an assassination attempt against him.

“Just about three or four weeks ago on Dec. 21, a person was arrested who was on their way from Sacramento to Washington, D.C., at a speed stop in Iowa. And the police asked him where he was going, and he was going to Washington, D.C., to kill Dr. Fauci,” he explained. “And they found in his car an AR-15 and multiple magazines of ammunition, because he thinks that maybe I’m killing people. So I ask myself, why would Senator want to do this? So go to Rand Paul’s website, and you see ‘Fire Dr. Fauci’ with a little box that says ‘contribute here’ … so you are making a catastrophic epidemic for your political gain.”

At that point, Democratic Washington Sen. Patty Murray, the committee chair, cut off both men to move to questions from other committee members.

COLUMN BY

DYLAN HOUSMAN

Healthcare reporter. Follow Dylan on Twitter

RELATED VIDEO: After Project Veritas released a video last night that exposed Dr. Fauci’s involvement in sponsoring Gain-of-Function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology, Fauci HIMSELF addressed the story when questioned by Senator Roger Marshall.

REALTED TWEET:

The Fauci emails are worse than anyone expectedhttps://t.co/WHAJiiwS91

— George Papadopoulos (@GeorgePapa19) January 12, 2022

RELATED ARTICLES:

‘Try To Cover Your Ass:’ Rand Paul Demands Fauci Resign For Refusing To Admit To Funding Gain Of Function Research In Wuhan

Rand Paul Says Fauci ‘Ignores The Science, Causes Hysteria And Creates Fear’

FAUCI LIED: Military Documents Contradict Fauci’s Sworn Testimony on Gain of Function Research

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Pathology Results Show 93% of People Who Died After Being Vaccinated Were Killed By The Vaccine thumbnail

Pathology Results Show 93% of People Who Died After Being Vaccinated Were Killed By The Vaccine

/in , , , /by

By The Geller Report

On pathology exam these people definitely died from vaccine. And these criminals are mandating it for children.

The vaccine was implicated in 93% of the deaths in the patients they examined. What’s troubling is the coroner didn’t implicate the vaccine in any of those deaths.

By: Steve Kirsch, Dec 28, 2021:

Summary

The vaccines are bad news. Fifteen bodies were examined (all died from 7 days to 6 months after vaccination; ages 28 to 95). The coroner or the public prosecutor didn’t associate the vaccine as the cause of death in any of the cases. However, further examination revealed that the vaccine was implicated in the deaths of 14 of the 15 cases. The most attacked organ was the heart (in all of the people who died), but other organs were attacked as well. The implications are potentially enormous resulting in millions of deaths. The vaccines should be immediately halted.

No need to worry. It is doubtful that anything will happen because the work wasn’t published in a peer-reviewed journal so will be ignored by the scientific community. That’s just the way it works.

The paper

I got an email recently from Mike Yeadon, former VP of Pfizer, who urged me to check out this video. He wrote me this email on 12/24/21:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/fHIT55iM4Zv9/

Steve,

This is about the worst 15min I’ve ever seen.

Mass covid19 vaccination is leading to mass murder.

Mike

The video references this paper, posted on December 10, 2021, On COVID vaccines: why they cannot work, and irrefutable evidence of their causative role in deaths after vaccination by Sucharit Bhakdi, MD and Arne Burkhardt, MD. It has been getting a lot of attention lately.

Check out the number of likes and retweets… just in the first 3 hours!

The authors did an autopsy in 15 patients who died (from 7 days to 6 months) after receiving the COVID vaccine. These were all cases where the coroner ruled as NOT being caused by the vaccine. They discovered that in 14 of the 15 patients there was widespread evidence of the body attacking itself, something that is never seen before. The heart was attacked in all 14 cases. A number of salient aspects dominated in all affected tissues of all cases:

  1. inflammatory events in small blood vessels (endotheliitis), characterized by an abundance of T-lymphocytes and sequestered, dead endothelial cells within the vessel lumen;
  2. the extensive perivascular accumulation of T-lymphocytes;
  3. a massive lymphocytic infiltration of surrounding non-lymphatic organs or tissue with T-lymphocytes.

Lymphocytic infiltration occasionally occurred in combination with intense lymphocytic activation and follicle formation. Where these were present, they were usually accompanied by tissue destruction.

Here’s the video presentation of the results.

VAERS as well as other independent studies (e.g., see this vaccine injury paper) shows the vaccines are killing people and that cardiac events were highly elevated. This study is consistent with those results.

This work independently validates the analysis of Peter Schimacher who showed a minimum of 30% to 40% of the deaths after vaccine were caused by the vaccine.

Reactions from a level-headed scientist (name withheld to protect him from attack)

If the autopsy findings are confirmed by other pathologists with additional samples, and if they are combined with the findings of Dr. Hoffe (>60% inoculant recipients have elevated D-dimer tests and evidence of clotting) and Dr. Cole (increase in cancers after inoculation, including twenty-fold increase in uterine cancer), we are seeing a disaster of unimaginable proportions.  The conclusion (if supported by further data) is that essentially EVERY inoculant recipient suffers damage, with more damage after each shot.  Given the seriousness of the types of damage (autoimmune diseases, cancer, re-emergent dormant infections, clotting/strokes, cardiac damage, etc.), these effects will translate into lifespan reduction, which should be counted as deaths from the inoculations.  So, in the USA, where ~200M people have been fully inoculated, the number of deaths will not be the 10,000 or so reported in VAERS, or the 150,000+ scaled-up deaths from VAERS, but could be closer to tens of millions when the inoculation effects play out!

What the above three findings (Burkhart, Hoffe, Cole, and I suspect many others who have not yet come forward) show is that the post-inoculation effects are not rare events (as reported by the media-gov’t), but are in actuality frequent events.  They may be, in fact, universal, with the severity and damage different for each recipient.

The question in my mind is whether it is possible to reverse these inoculation-based adverse events.  Can the innate immune system be fully restored?  Can the micro clotting be reversed?  Can the autoimmunity be reversed?  I have seen a wide spectrum of opinions on whether this is possible, none of which is overly convincing.

Are we headed for the situation where the ~30% unvaxxed will be devoting their lives to operating whatever is left of the economic infrastructure and serving as caretakers for the vaxxed?

I realize the above sounds extreme, and maybe when more data are gathered from myriad credible sources the results and conclusions may change, but right now the above data seem to synchronize with the demonstrated underlying mechanisms of damage.  Additionally, we seem to be doubling down on inoculations, with fourth booster being proposed for Israel, and UK suggesting quarterly boosters.

Dr. Ryan Cole’s reaction

I agree with the assessment and conclusions.

It is critically important that the vaccines don’t cause one to produce secretory IgA. I have emphasized this in many lectures lately. This is why the vaccinated carry high viral loads.

The T cell infiltrates are tissue destructive. A study I would like to see is spike deposited in the organs at the site of the infiltrates. This study could be done with special tissue stains. We need to seem more and more series like this one.

Background of two of the scientists behind the study

Dr. Bhakdi has spent his life practicing, teaching and researching medical microbiology and infectious diseases. He chaired the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene at the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Germany, from 1990 until his retirement in 2012. He has published over 300 research articles in the fields of immunology, bacteriology, virology and parasitology, and served from 1990 to 2012 as Editor-in-Chief of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, one of the first scientific journals of this field that was founded by Robert Koch in 1887.

Dr. Arne Burkhardt is a pathologist who has taught at the Universities of Hamburg, Berne and Tübingen. He was invited for visiting professorships/study visits in Japan (Nihon University), the United States (Brookhaven National Institute), Korea, Sweden, Malaysia and Turkey. He headed the Institute of Pathology in Reutlingen for 18 years. Subsequently, he worked as an independent practicing pathologist with consulting contracts with laboratories in the US. Burkhardt has published more than 150 scientific articles in German and international scientific journals as well as contributions to handbooks in German, English and Japanese. Over many years he has audited and certified institutes of pathology in Germany.

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Quick note: Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here. We will not waver. We will not tire. We will not falter, and we will not fail. Freedom will prevail.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here — it’s free and it’s critical NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America’s survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Variants, Propaganda, Fear and Genocide thumbnail

Variants, Propaganda, Fear and Genocide

/in , , , , , /by

By Kelleigh Nelson

“The greatest triumphs of propaganda have been accomplished, not by doing something, but by refraining from doing.  Great is truth, but still greater, from a practical point of view, is silence about truth.” –  Aldous Huxley

“Dictators seek to control men’s thoughts as well as their bodies and so they attempt to dictate science, education and religion. But dictated education is usually propaganda, dictated history is often mythology, dictated science is pseudo-science.”  — Edwin Grant Conklin (biologist and zoologist)

“Propaganda works best when those being manipulated believe they are confident they are acting on their own free will.” –  Joseph Goebbels

“The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one or a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” –  James Madison

Fear is False Evidence Appearing Real, but is not of the Lord. “But whoso hearkeneth unto me shall dwell safely, and shall be quiet from fear of evil.” Proverbs 1:33. Rest in Him.

British science fiction writer, Ian Watson said, “If you have to be persuaded, reminded, pressured, lied to, incentivized, coerced, bullied, socially shamed, guilt-tripped, threatened, punished and criminalized; if all of this is considered necessary to gain your compliance, you can be absolutely certain that what is being promoted is not in our best interest.”

Propaganda produces fear, and fear produces compliance.

Between 1933 and 1939, about half of the German-Jewish population and more than two-thirds of Austrian Jews (1938-1939) fled Nazi persecution. Others stayed as they hadn’t the wherewithal to leave or they thought the situation temporary, but by 1939 it became too late. The citizenry had become so fearful that they bowed their heads and said not a word despite seeing the pervasive evil against their neighbors.  The same has happened over and over again throughout history with Stalin, Lenin, Pol Pot, Ceausescu, Mao and others.  Even the 1989 Tiananmen Square student protests didn’t arouse the rest of the citizenry.  Fear dominated and kept them silent.

Now we are seeing the same reactions in America.  Most citizens accept the destruction of freedom for their “safety.”  Yet others who are exposing the totalitarian and despotic tactics are speaking out and risking their own livelihoods.  It is up to every American citizen who loves freedom and liberty to join them and shed the propaganda and fear that has subjugated our electorate.  Stand now, or the gulags may be imminent.

Omicron Breaks Thru Immunity

Dr. Peter McCullough, internist, cardiologist and epidemiologist, has informed the public via America Out Loud, that his, “Once and Done,” natural immunity from Covid and its variants is no longer true with Omicron.  He states the following:

While we have a mix of prolonged Delta cases and in many cases with moderate to severe symptoms, Omicron syndrome has been characterized as mild and brief with a notable absence of pulmonary symptoms. How did Omicron secure this large and growing ecological niche? We have learned that Omicron replicates at a 70-fold increased rate over Delta. 

Additionally, Omicron appears to generate immunity not only against itself, but also against Delta, the prior dominant variant. So as Omicron moves through the population rapidly, it is providing a larger immunologic barrier to further Delta expansion and will likely work to bring down the Delta curve as the same time the Omicron peak continues to build in a sharply upward, and hopefully brief spike in cases.

Dr. McCullough also comments that monoclonal antibody products are unlikely to neutralize Omicron, leaving only Sotrovimab by Glaxo Smith Klein as the remaining antibody treatment in the armamentarium for high-risk seniors who develop severe symptoms with Omicron. (High risk being elderly with numerous comorbidities.)

The World Health Organization (WHO) tells that this variant came out of South Africa and has a number of mutations, some of which are concerning.  You might want to read their article as they are listing what countries are “required to do.”  WHO is telling us that Omicron poses a very high risk, but that’s not what we’re seeing!  Dr. McCullough says there are about 30 mutations of this variant whereas Delta had only about seven mutations in the spike protein.  However, this variant has a lower infectivity than the Delta variant, actually about a third or less.

Still, there are 145 research studies confirm naturally acquired immunity to CV-19: documented, linked and quoted.

I am shocked that a “variant” of the original virus would be able to jump over the natural immunity gained from recovery of the original.  In the past, all “variants” were only 2.5 to 3% of the original and were fought off by natural immunity.  My immediate thought was that Omicron is a new virus, but Dr. McCullough says the clot shot recipients are creating these new variants and spreading them.  Thus, it may not end any time soon.

Repeated Injections Cause Death

In a late November 2021 podcast with Dr. McCullough, he said, “The revelation that with each injection of COVID-19 genetic “vaccines,” that spike protein is loaded into the human body and accumulates to an even higher level, causing inflammation and organ injury in the brain, heart, immune system, and bone marrow, are stunning from a clinical perspective. As the viral pandemic ebbs, we can expect to learn and hear more about how the COVID-19 “vaccines,” which are now administered by mandate and in some countries by force, grow in strength as the leading public health threat and, instead of preventing disease, become significant determinants of a whole new class of illnesses leading to disability, hospitalization, and death.”

A week earlier Dr. McCullough warned that repeated injections of COVID mRNA or “viral vector” “vaccines” could lead to an overwhelming of the human body with the lethal “spike protein” which mimics that of the virus it is expected to prevent. “The spike protein on the ball of the virus is the same protein that’s in the human body after vaccination, so whether or not someone’s been exposed to it from the respiratory illness, or whether or not someone’s taken the vaccine, they now are exposed to the spike protein,” McCullough said. Based on published scientific research, McCullough said, “the spike protein does damage the heart…”

The good doctor is absolutely sure that those who have had the clot shot are creating these variants and that so far Omicron shows mild symptoms and this variant is not covered by the clot shots, (as though anything was).  Delta exhibited considerable antigenic escape, but this degree of mutation with Omicron, almost certainly escapes any effect of the jab and this is seen with Big Pharma now changing the jabs. They have announced a turn to develop a product against this variant.

Stay away from these poisonous injections!

Never Vaccinate During Pandemics

Dr. McCullough says it’s a huge mistake to vaccinate during a global pandemic because there is simply too much prevalent virus.  The virus will make mistakes when it replicates and with Delta, it clearly was an evolutionary link and went from a minor mutation to 100%.  Delta was a huge evolutionary advantage over other strains, so Delta in effect wiped out Alpha, Beta, Gamma.  Omicron’s early reads on the molecular structure probably won’t wipe out Delta because it’s so sufficiently successful in surviving in the nose and the mouth of the jabbed.  We know this from a number of studies.  Thirty nine percent of 31 infections resulted in homes of fully jabbed.

The nasal and oral passages of infected contain 251-1000 more of the viral load and Dr. McCullough has recommended nasal cleansing with the following instructions to be used every four hours by spraying up the nose and by gargling.  Don’t swallow it, and if it burns, dilute just a bit more, but not too much.  The recipe follows:

0.62% Dilute Solution

1 cup sterile water (this volume enough for 7 days)

1 Tablespoon of 10% Povidone Iodine (PVD-I)

¼ teaspoon salt

In the labs, a 1% solution of Povidone Iodine has been shown to be 99.99%

Effective as an antiviral treatment in just 30 seconds.

0.50% solutions have also been shown to be effective especially with repeated treatments.

This treatment has been shown to tremendously reduce mortality, morbidity, and hospital as well as financial burden in this covid situation.  This actually is a great reduction without systemic therapy for active viral infections.  It is also a prophylactic for healthy people used a couple times a day after being out or at work.  Dr. McCullough also explains that if you have Grave’s Disease, are pregnant or allergic to iodine, you can switch over to diluted hydrogen peroxide and get a very similar effect.  Dentists have actually been the teachers for this oral and nasal wash.

The virus is not spread when you are asymptomatic; it is only spread when you become ill, unlike what Anthony Fauci, our modern-day Hitler, Goebbels and Mengele, tells us.  There are three to five days between the time of contact with an ill person and when you’d come down with the virus, and this nasal wash intercepts that carriage and knocks it out before becoming symptomatic.

Another warning is that anyone with comorbidities should find where their monoclonal antibody centers are and even if they’re not very sick yet, they should apply to immediately get the shots.  The only patients dying or being hospitalized are those who are receiving inadequate treatments.

There are many physicians who are proponents of early treatment with safe and inexpensive drugs. Their names and interviews have been widespread.  They are men of courage and bravery standing against the totalitarian onslaught of the clot shots, knowing early treatment would have saved 86% of those who unnecessarily died and died alone.

Anyone under 70, without comorbidities or excess weight, is fairly safe from a virus 99.8% recover from.  Those stats are better than seasonal flu which no one seems to die of since CV-19 came along.  No one is safe from the vaxxed whose bodies are creating the variants and whose nasal and oral cavities contain 241 to 1000 times more of the viral load than the unvaxxed.  Who the hell are these totalitarian despots fooling, only the subjugated compliant lemmings?  The lies are being exposed!

Dr. Michael Yeadon on CV-19 Variants

Dr. Michael Yeadon is the former Chief Science Officer and Vice President of Pfizer Pharmaceuticals. He has come forward with the truth of the vaccinations, the truth about Covid-19, and the truth about the new “variants” that are being pushed onto us.

Like so many other physicians and scientists, Dr. Yeadon has been “exposed” as a conspiracy theorist and fraud by our commie Pravda media and the alleged “fact checkers.”  Remember that the fact checkers have sworn up and down that Dr. FauxChi is brilliant, reliable, honest and knows what is best for the world’s population.  I’d suggest they read the most referenced book in today’s market by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., The Real Anthony Fauci.

Dr. Yeadon was one of the first courageous scientists to expose the Sars-coV-2 injections as dangerous to our health and well-being.

Here is what Dr. Yeadon believes according to a multitude of his interviews and presentations.  This was printed in late December 2021.

  • There is no new variant.
    • The changes that have been madeto the virus are so miniscule, our own immune systems will not pick up a change nor will treat it any differently than the original variant.
    • Being that the changes are so minimal, there will be no reason for additional vaccinations, nor any vaccinations to combat the new variant being released onto the people of the world.
    • The original variant was less deadly than influenza.
  • Why would they push a new variant if it wasn’t as dangerous as they are claiming?
    • The new variant is being touted by mainstream media and the medical practitioners per orders of the governments of the world. If there is a new variant, the people react with panic. They re-mask. They hide and quarantine again. They rush in line to get the vaccination. – The Ultimate Goal.
  • What is the target population for the vaccination?
    • The easiest targets, to get more than 50% of the population are the Elderly, the population that have underlying health issues, and those in contact with both of the above. That leaves approximately 30% left unvaccinated.
    • The rest will be herded as a social faux-pas to not fall in line via College Attendance, School Attendance, Unable to work or shop without the vaccination.
  • I’ve heard of magnets connecting to injection sites, But why?
    • Don’t believe me. Do your own experiment.
    • The vaccinations do indeed have a sort of chip, or QR code imbedded.
    • The magnet trick is NOT a hoax. Go ahead and try it. Stick a magnet to your injection site, within two-inch diameter of the injection. Depending on which vaccine you received, either a magnet will stick OR a small metal object such as a key will stick. You can actually feel the pull as the object connects to the implant.
    • If you have an EMF Detector, try to use that. Scan anywhere on your body. Because humans are made of energy, many of us will naturally give off an EMF signal. However, the injection site will push the readings through the roof.
  • Life expectancy after injection.
    • I encourage you to do your own due diligence, however many reputable scientists have publicly stated that the life expectancy of someone who was healthy prior to the vaccination is anywhere from 2-7 years post injection. Someone with underlying health issues, the life expectancy is much lower.
  • Why would they do this to the world population?
    • What could be easier to gain total totalitarian control over the world?
      • Movement Tracking
      • Health Condition Tracking
      • Monetary Tracking
      • Less People, once the individuals with underlying health conditions suffer deadly side effects

Dr. Yeadon asks, “Can you think of a benign explanation for why you would want to give an experimental use-authorized gene-based vaccine to millions, tens of millions of people who cannot possibly die if they ran into this virus?  The answer is no, you cannot, can you!”

Dr. Pierre Kory, Climbing Death Records

World renowned CV19 critical care and pulmonary expert Dr. Pierre Kory says the data is clear the CV19 injections are “not safe, not effective” and show they are causing a huge number of deaths.

Dr. Kory warns, “They already broke death records with these vaccines almost a year ago.  Now, you are starting to see it in actuarial data with life insurance companies.  The life insurance companies have been paying out claims like they never have before, and they are noticing the deaths cannot be explained by Covid.

“If you look at the actual morbidity and mortality from the CDC in 2019, 2020 and 2021 in the ages of 18 to 64, you’ll see in America, starting in quarter two of the year 2021 (when the vaccines started), the mortalities started to rise, and it rose from 120% above normal to 140% above normal, and it’s far exceeded the death rates in 2020.  The difference in 2020 and 2021, we had covid in both years.  In 2021, we had the vaccines.”

Former Pfizer VP Dr. Michael Yeadon in the first week of 2022, said, “Max vaccination is leading to mass death.”  Dr. Kory agrees and explains, “It’s not only data from a life insurance company that came out this week that is based on CDC data that can’t be explained by Covid alone, there are huge increases of dying in this country this year.

“They have done huge analyses of the European mortality data as well as the U.S. mortality data and they controlled for vaccination status.  They found that for every age range that they looked at, the all-cause mortality of the vaccinated was increased over the unvaccinated.  All-cause mortality means that you are more likely to die of something if you are vaccinated.

“All-cause mortality is coming out of actual databases by credible scientists.  You have life insurance companies showing the data, and you have our own federal government showing unexplained large rises in dying.  Don’t you think a good scientific question and a good hypothesis to test would be ‘Could these be the vaccines?’

“The answer is ‘the vaccines,’ and I cannot find a better fit to answering that hypothesis than that, it’s this mass explosion of this vaccination policy with single, double and booster shots.  It’s going like wildfire through the population.  If the mortality of the vaccinated is higher than the unvaccinated, you have the data that you can safely and confidently conclude the vaccines are associated with and causing death.”

In closing, Dr. Kory says, “What has happened in the last month or so is the data for adverse reactions and effects are no longer hidden and suppressed.  They are coming out on servers . . . and actuarial tables.”

Gateway Pundit carried an important article regarding a 145-country study showing massive increases in death after the CV19 jab.

Dr. Kory tells people to go to the Front Line Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance website and get any and all information for treating Covid-19 for free.

Conclusion

The Mayo Clinic in Minnesota fired 700 unvaccinated health care workers the first week of 2022, despite nurses at the clinic issuing a warning several weeks ago about staffing issues.  America’s once great medical care has been decimated.  In 1984, we were at the very top of industrialized nations, but after 38 years of FauxChi at the helm, we are at the very bottom.  Doctors and nurses have retired early or have been fired for refusing the clot shots. All medical facilities are massively understaffed.

The three courageous and brilliant physicians/scientist mentioned in this article are risking their reputations, their livelihoods and their families to warn and save Americans.  But there are others who are speaking out who are not as virtuous or trustworthy. They are controlled opposition. My next article will expose one of them.

Too many Americans are herded by propaganda.  Matthew 10:16 tells us, “Behold, I send you forth as sheep in the midst of wolves, be ye therefore wise as serpents, and harmless as doves.”

©Kelleigh Nelson. All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLES:

145-Country Study Shows Increase Of Transmission And Death After Introduction Of Covid Vaccines

Project veritas DARPA leaks showing Fauci malfeasance for what we all KNOW he did

CDC Director Rochelle Walensky Says COVID-19 Vaccine Can’t Stop Transmission Anymore

A Texas team comes up with a COVID vaccine that could be a global game changer

Insurance CEO Drops Bombshell, Vax Even Worse Than Imagined

Biden’s Mandate Goes to The Supreme Court thumbnail

Biden’s Mandate Goes to The Supreme Court

/in , , , , /by

By Neland Nobel

President Joe Biden, or more likely his handlers that pull the strings, imposed a controversial mandate on large and small employers to force vaccination for the Wuhan virus. Having been unable to get legislation through Congress, he decided to use Executive edict, thereby essentially writing legislation, which is the job of Congress.

This Presidential overreach has now gone before the Supreme Court and early indications are that it is not going well for the Administration.

The conservative majority on the court seems skeptical that law can essentially be written by Biden himself, avoiding Congress, by ordering OSHA, an agency that is a regulatory body for workplace safety, to enforce a medical mandate. It also seems that at least some justices do not believe OSHA has the power, under current law, to be imposing a mandate for vaccinations.

It is also becoming increasingly clear, to even those with little medical training, that those individuals who have been vaccinated both get and spread the virus. If that is true, what is the purpose of a mandate, even if the President has the authority to impose one? Listening to some of the comments from the judges, it is not clear they are well informed on a variety of virus issues. Some dialogue indicated that some were blissfully unaware that the vaccinated were spreading and becoming ill. Some unvaccinated individuals have already had the virus, and thus have more robust protection than vaccinated people. But the government only seems to recognize antibodies and T cells that result from vaccines and ignore those same cells and immune system mechanisms if created naturally. This is absurd.

There appears to be no logical medical reason or legal authority for imposing such a mandate. Rather it is largely a political move to satisfy the Democrat Party base, which ran on the lofty proposition that they could control the virus because they “had a plan” and the other guy supposedly did not. How is that working for ya?

Well, the plan is failing on a number of levels and it is obvious to anyone who is still reasonably alert. It is once again a central planning hammer, of one size, fits all medicine. The medical profession has moved from treating the patient to groveling before public health officials and politicians. 

Beyond the profound constitutional questions of avoiding the Congress and assuming police powers that rightfully belong to the states, the mandate has created additional collateral damage that goes well beyond violating the function of the Executive under the Constitution. Besides a serious blow to medical ethics,  they have recruited corporations to violate basic rights instead of the government doing it directly. And it would seem that some corporations, many highly beholden for subsidies and bailouts, are more than willing to play along with the attack on liberty.

Mandates and their enforcement violate personal liberty and the right to medical privacy. It introduces the question: how far into employee private affairs can an employer go, as a condition of employment? Since the vaccines do not stop the transmission of the virus to others, it is hard to argue a private mandate is in the general health interest of the workforce. However, it could be argued that vaccines reduce the severity and therefore the chance, and expense, of hospitalization. Since private companies subsidize healthcare and are concerned about a fully functioning workforce, they would have some legitimate interest in reducing potential health costs and absenteeism.

How far can you go in that direction? Smoking increases potential health care costs. So do drinking, bad driving,  a bad diet, and abortions. Does a company have a right to dictate these kinds of personal choices to employees? Where did my body, my life go to? Do you mean a society that endorses the idea that minors can undergo sex-change operations without parental consultation because “we all have personal autonomy with our bodies”, will allow employees to have private choices circumscribed by employers because it might reduce potential costs? Are we now serfs living on the manor, subject to the rules of the prince?

What if the vaccines are shown to have serious side effects that show up in the future? May an employee, forced by the condition of employment to take an experimental drug, sue the employer for damages? Should employers even be interfering in lifestyle and medical questions like this? Perhaps in the form of incentives such as gym memberships or reduced health insurance premium payments, they might wish to incentivize their workforce towards certain behaviors. But mandates, that if violated, result in termination?

Moreover, vaccines are not the ONLY way to reduce the severity of the virus and potential cost. Could employers demand that certain medications and therapeutics be taken by employees because taking them reduces the severity and the chance of hospitalization? Could you imagine Bank of America mandating that ivermectin be taken if an employee develops Covid, because it has been shown to reduce the severity, and thereby likely reduce costs? There would be justifiable outrage. Medication is a choice that should be made by the patient and his doctor.

It has also demonstrated that the Federal Government, by providing payments to medical companies and others, can use fear of financial retribution to coerce private companies to do their bidding. It can do this to defense contractors and others with direct contact with the Federal Government. In fact, since most large companies and universities, and even local schools receive at least some funding from the Federal Government, this use of financial intimidation sets another ugly precedent. That which the Federal government subsidizes, it should control.

Some of our corporations have now snuggled into bed with the Federal Government, such as the auto companies, airlines, and the big banks, all of which received bailouts of one form or another, that the relationship would likely bring a gleam to the eye of Benito Mussolini.

Such a wide range of medical companies may receive Medicare or Medicaid payments, it would seem to include the entire industry. Does it follow that this extends to employees who are not officers in the corporation? Does it extend to patients?

How else can one explain, for example, the Mayo Clinic dismissing 700 nurses, during a huge surge in the pandemic with the rapid spread of the Omicron variant? Could it be because they might get Medicare money, research money, and the like? It seems illogical, and just plain stupid, to fire medical workers when you have a surge in critically ill patients to care for. That is certainly not putting the patient’s interest first. It is putting money and the government first. This has tarnished the Mayo Clinic’s reputation with both its staff and its clients. In addition, imagine the cost that must be absorbed to re-hire and train new nurses up to the superior standards found at the Mayo clinic. Who eats those costs?

And, it begs this question: why do so many highly trained medical personnel choose not to be vaccinated?

Likewise firing military personnel when we face significant challenges from China, Russia, and Iran hardly seems the right thing to do to enhance combat readiness. However here, the government has more authority because they run the armed services, one of the few real responsibilities given to the Federal government by the Constitution. In addition, people voluntarily serve and agree to certain rules. That said, there are multiple examples now, of Naval ships having to abort their missions and stay in port because their crew of 100% vaccinated sailors are experiencing an outbreak of the virus. Just because you might have the power to coerce things in the military does not necessarily mean it is the correct policy.

Biden has repeatedly divided the country by attacking those who have chosen not to vaccinate, some on religious grounds, some on medical grounds, and many who have already had the virus, and thus have protection more thorough and longer-lasting than offered by the vaccine. He repeats the big lie that the unvaccinated are the cause of the continuation of the pandemic.

This is one of those rare occasions where the failure of a medical procedure is blamed on those who did not have it. You would think at some point the Administration would see the sheer idiocy of their policies. But, that may be wishful thinking.

We certainly hope the Supreme Court will block the Administration from further unconstitutional edicts, but our worry is they can’t entirely stop the Administration from wreaking damage on schools, universities, private companies, and others, fearful that money, if not law, will rule.

Youth Depression, Suicide Increasing During Pandemic Response thumbnail

Youth Depression, Suicide Increasing During Pandemic Response

/in , , , /by

By Kerry McDonald

As data on the unintended consequences of pandemic policy becomes gloomier, policy makers are beginning to acknowledge tradeoffs.

Government policies meant to curtail the COVID-19 pandemic have resulted in unintended consequences that threaten lives—including, tragically, the lives of young people who are generally spared from the worst effects of COVID-19.

School closures, stay-at-home orders, and shutdowns of businesses deemed “non-essential” are contributing to surging rates of depression and suicide among young people, as well as rising incidences of drug overdoses and related deaths.

The New York Times reported this week that an alarming increase in student suicides has prompted schools in Las Vegas to move quickly to reopen schools for in-person learning. In the Clark County, Nevada school district, 18 students took their lives during the nine months of school closures, which is double the number of students who committed suicide in the district in all of 2019. The youngest child was just nine years old.

According to the Times: “One student left a note saying he had nothing to look forward to.”

Youth despair amid lockdowns and related public health orders appears to be worsening. While US aggregate suicide data for 2020 won’t be available for a couple of years, due to reporting lags, state and county-level data reveal dismal trends. In Pima County, Arizona suicides were up 67 percent in 2020 compared to the previous year for children ages 12 to 17, and statewide childhood suicides had also increased since 2019. West Virginia has seen a spike in student suicide attempts during the pandemic. Parts of Wisconsin reported skyrocketing suicide rates among young people in 2020, while hospitals in Texas and North Carolina are seeing more young suicidal patients.

CDC data show a 24 percent increase in emergency room mental health visits for children ages 5 to 11, compared to 2019. Among adolescents ages 12 to 17, that increase is 31 percent. Last summer, the CDC reported that one in four young adults had contemplated suicide in the previous month.

Childhood and adolescent mental health has been deteriorating over the past decade, with youth depression and suicide rates climbing. But the isolation and hopelessness brought on by the pandemic response has exacerbated this trend. Earlier this month, a high school student and football star in Illinois, who had struggled previously with depression, committed suicide. His father says that his son’s “depression worsened significantly after Covid hit.”

Another high schooler and football player in Maine, Spencer Smith, took his own life last month after leaving a note saying that he felt locked in his house and the peer separation with remote learning was too much for him to bear any longer. “The kids need their peers more than ever now,” his father, Jay Smith, said. “They need face-to-face contact so they can let their emotions out.”

Some researchers recognized early on in the pandemic that there would be significant unintended consequences of lockdowns and government orders, warning of high mental health costs and other declines in public health. “The COVID-19 crisis may increase suicide rates during and after the pandemic,” noted a June 2020 paper in QJM: An International Journal of Medicine. “Mental health consequences of the COVID-19 crisis including suicidal behavior are likely to be present for a long time and peak later than the actual pandemic.”

Later, the authors of the Great Barrington Declaration, a document that urges a “focused protection” response to COVID-19 rather than universally restrictive pandemic policies, explained that public health policy must look at all aspects of public health—not just one virus and not just near-term effects.

Harvard University biostatistician, Martin Kulldorff, told The Wall Street Journal that “you can’t just look at COVID, you have to look holistically at health and consider the collateral damage.” One of the authors of the Great Barrington Declaration, Kulldorff adds: “You can’t just look short-term.”

What Kulldorff and other public health researchers expose is the fact that there are tradeoffs to any policy. “If it saves just one life,” a mantra echoed during the COVID response as a rallying cry for lockdowns, fails to acknowledge the lives damaged or lost due to these lockdown policies. Lockdown harms and deaths are as real as COVID harms and deaths and should be taken seriously when considering a holistic pandemic response.

Economists scrutinize tradeoffs, and many have been highlighting COVID-related tradeoffs since last spring. As FEE’s Antony Davies and James Harrigan wrote in April: “Regardless of whether we acknowledge them, tradeoffs exist. And acknowledging tradeoffs is an important part of constructing sound policy.”

This basic economic principle was beautifully articulated by Henry Hazlitt in his classic book, Economics in One Lesson:

The art of economics consists in looking not merely at the immediate but at the longer effects of any act or policy; it consists in tracing the consequences of that policy not merely for one group but for all groups.

Nine-tenths of the economic fallacies that are working such dreadful harm in the world today are the result of ignoring this lesson. Those fallacies all stem from one of two central fallacies, or both: that of looking only at the immediate consequences of an act or proposal, and that of looking at the consequences only for a particular group to the neglect of other groups.

As data on the unintended consequences of pandemic policy becomes gloomier, policy makers are beginning to acknowledge tradeoffs. School reopenings in Las Vegas are one positive sign of this policy shift, but more needs to be done to loosen harmful pandemic restrictions and allow for social and economic life to rebound.

The justification for the widespread lockdowns and pandemic restrictions enacted since last spring was to save lives, but it’s becoming increasingly clear that these mandatory measures are costing lives and may be ineffective at slowing the spread of the coronavirus.

This is particularly important now as more research shows that the harms of lockdowns and related policies may outweigh their benefits. A new peer-reviewed study in the European Journal of Clinical Investigation finds that restrictive, mandatory policies may not be any more effective at controlling the spread of the coronavirus than more voluntary measures.

“We do not question the role of all public health interventions, or of coordinated communications about the epidemic, but we fail to find an additional benefit of stay-at-home orders and business closures,” the researchers conclude.

There is no perfect policy response to a pandemic, but acknowledging tradeoffs, examining consequences across groups and over time, and advocating for a more voluntary, decentralized approach can minimize human costs and maximize overall health and well-being.

*****

This article is reprinted with permission from FEE, Foundation for Economic Education.

SCOTUS Justices’ COVID Ignorance Illustrates Why They Should Stay in Their Lane thumbnail

SCOTUS Justices’ COVID Ignorance Illustrates Why They Should Stay in Their Lane

/in , , , , /by

By Selwyn Duke

Aside from labeling herself “an affirmative action baby,” Supreme Court Justice Sonya Sotomayor once called herself a “wise Latina.” Given this, apropos here is a line from ancient Chinese sage Confucius:

“Wisdom is, when you know something, knowing that you know it; and when you do not know something, knowing that you do not know it.”

Sotomayor certainly failed this test during oral arguments on Friday over the Biden Administration’s COVID-19 “vaccine” mandates, making outlandishly incorrect claims that have brought her mockery. “We have hospitals that are almost at full capacity with people severely ill on ventilators,” she stated matter-of-factly. “We have over 100,000 children, which we’ve never had before, in serious condition, many on ventilators.”

Both assertions are so distant from reality that one could wonder where the judge gets her information; even limiting yourself to just New York Times perusal shouldn’t yield such profound ignorance.

In reality, hospitals are not nearly overwhelmed, and the children hospitalized who have coronavirus number only about 3,700 according to the CDC. Yet even this is misleading. As Dr. Anthony Fauci himself admitted recently — with Democrats’ tanking poll numbers inspiring him to paint a rosier picture — most of these children are hospitalized “with” SARS-CoV-2, not “because” of COVID-19.

(Note: The former is the pathogen; “COVID-19” is the disease that can result from it. So, technically, it’s not even correct to say that asymptomatic kids under medical care and testing positive for the virus are hospitalized “with COVID”; there is no “COVID” because they have no symptoms.)

As Fauci confessed, every child admitted to the hospital is automatically tested for the China virus, and thus will a kid being treated for a broken leg be listed as a hospitalization “with” SARS-CoV-2 upon a positive result. Of course, this merely echoes what those of us in the truthful media have been saying for, uh…almost two years.

What’s more, even though pediatric with-China-virus hospitalizations appear to have risen, this is likely only because we’re in respiratory disease season and the Omicron variant is more contagious (but less deadly) than earlier strains.

The bottom line, however, is that healthy children are not imperiled by this disease. In fact, a recent study analyzing 15 months of the pandemic in Germany, a nation of 83 million people, found that not even one healthy youngster died of COVID.

Sotomayor wasn’t alone in proving that epidemiology isn’t her bag. Justice Neil Gorsuch said during oral arguments that “[w]e have flu vaccines. Flu kills — I believe — hundreds of thousands of people every year.” While the judge didn’t explicitly say that he was referencing the United States (and not the world), his comments’ context makes clear that he was talking about our country. In reality, however, influenza claims an average of between 12,000 and 60,000 Americans annually.

In fairness, Gorsuch’s mistake wasn’t as egregious as Sotomayor’s. Not only did he preface his claim with “I believe,” indicating unsureness, but severe flu pandemics have killed upwards of 100,000. The Spanish flu in 1918-’19, for example, claimed 675,000 Americans (more than two million adjusted for today’s population). Nonetheless, he still was in error.

All this said, it wouldn’t matter if there were one million American kids hospitalized for COVID and 100,000 on ventilators or if only two people died of the flu yearly — not insofar as a judge’s role goes, anyway.

A justice’s job is merely to render opinions on the constitutionality of executive and legislative actions, not on the wisdom of those actions. It’s not the business of the courts to remedy a perhaps stupid but constitutional law, order or status quo (or to be party to an unconstitutional one); that’s the role of legislators and/or chief executives, whose errancy can be remedied by the people, should the latter experience a moment of clarity at election time.

But Sotomayor’s and Gorsuch’s errors illustrate another reason why judges should stay in their lane:

When perhaps drunk on power and venturing beyond their lane, they get lost and swerve and too frequently crash even worse than when they, often wantingly, attempt to conduct their legitimate duties.

What’s more, we’re the ones they crash into.

Now, I could note here about lawyers in general, as Anglo-Irish satirist Jonathan Swift did in Gulliver’s Travels, “that in all points out of their own trade, they were usually the most ignorant and stupid generation among us, the most despicable in common conversation, avowed enemies to all knowledge and learning, and equally disposed to pervert the general reason of mankind in every other subject of discourse as in that of their own profession.”

But I wouldn’t do that (and not just because Swift already did). Rather, the point is that lawyers are specialists just like any other specialist, not Experts in the Area of Everything. As Professor Thomas Sowell has put it, most of us have expertise in only a narrow sphere of endeavor. Thus must a judge or leader possess enough humility to accept and recognize his limitations and not become a shining example of how a “little knowledge is dangerous.”

Unfortunately, though power may certainly corrupt, it surely can reveal a person’s true character. And part of the reason judges arrogantly engage in judicial activism is that we’ve invited them out of their lane. I reference here the idea of judicial supremacy, the notion that courts’ opinions are not only binding on those party to the case before them, but on the executive and legislative governmental branches as well.

This power, do note, was declared for the courts by the courts themselves, notably via the Marbury v. Madison decision (1803), and is not in the Constitution. It also is an idea that, if considered valid, Thomas Jefferson warned, would render our Constitution a felo de se — an act of suicide.

The proper role of the courts is, first, to rule on individual cases, with their decisions binding on a particular case’s litigants but no one else. Second and as Ambassador Alan Keyes put it to me on the phone years ago, their function is to act as an “alarm bell,” saying at times to the nation, “Beware! We think this law is unconstitutional; you need to take a look at it.” If the people are convinced, it’s then their job to elect officials who will effect the necessary change.

Conservatives will understandably be very happy if the SCOTUS strikes down the Biden administration’s “vaccine” coercion and if the feds, reflecting what they more or less have done for 200 years, then abide by the decision. Nonetheless, if Sotomayoresque stupidity doesn’t illustrate the folly of allowing five black-robed lawyers to decide what law means for 334 million people, I’m not sure what will.

By the way, some may wonder what we’d do if the courts couldn’t “strike down” the vax mandate wholesale. Well, a proper constitutional understanding also informs that the states have the power to nullify unconstitutional federal actions; this would especially carry moral weight if the “alarm bell” SCOTUS had already opined against the given action.

The bottom line is that the judiciary should be the weakest branch, as Alexander Hamilton said, not the strongest precisely because unelected judges are shielded from the consequences of their folly. And, as English philosopher Herbert Spencer warned, “The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with fools.”

And a bench of fools doesn’t make for a very good oligarchy.

Contact Selwyn Duke, follow him on MeWe or Parler, or log on to SelwynDuke.com.

©Selwyn Duke. All rights reserved,

3-year-old girl dies of heart attack one day after taking COVID vaccine thumbnail

3-year-old girl dies of heart attack one day after taking COVID vaccine

/in , , , , /by

By The Geller Report

Forcing children to have this vaccine is a crime of unprecedented magnitude.

3-year-old girl dies of heart attack one day after taking COVID vaccine

Ámbar Suárez died just days before Christmas after receiving a mandatory COVID-19 injection in order to attend school.

By: Raymond Wolfe,  Lifesite News, January 5, 2022:

TUCUMÁN, Argentina  – A three-year-old girl in Argentina died of a heart attack the day after receiving a COVID vaccine required for her to enter kindergarten, her mother said.

Speaking with Telefe Tucumán, Miryam Suárez said the vaccine and government mandate killed her daughter, Ámbar, who had been healthy and “full of life.”

“I pre-enrolled her in school so that next year she would enter kindergarten, because now they force you when it comes to the vaccine,” Suárez said. “She was healthy. She was fine. She was not ill and didn’t have COVID.”

Suárez took her daughter to get vaccinated on December 16. Ámbar passed away the next day after collapsing while playing with her friends. “She just collapsed and fell. I cannot believe it,” Suárez said.

The government “demands so much that they get the vaccine, and I know that the vaccine killed my three-year-old daughter,” the devastated mother continued. “She was fine. She did not have any health issues, nor was she a sick child. She was healthy, full of life.”

“This government that forces you [to get the vaccine] killed my three-year-old baby.”

Ámbar received the Chinese Sinopharm vaccine, which Argentina approved for children between the ages of three and 11 in October.

The Ministry of Public Health of Tucumán issued a statement on December 17 regarding Ámbar’s death, noting that police have launched an investigation into the incident:

On Thursday, December 16th 2021, at 12:00 pm, a three-year-old patient in cardiorespiratory arrest entered the Emergency Room of Hospital del Niño Jesús. Advanced resuscitation was performed and, when there was no response, [Ámbar Suárez’] death was declared. She has a history of taking the first dose of the Sinopharm vaccine the day before. Following protocol, police and judicial personnel have intervened and have ordered her autopsy. Considering the history of COVID vaccination, contact with family members has been initiated to gather pertinent information, evaluate other background information, and initiate an investigation of this unfortunate episode.

Argentina moved aggressively last year to vaccinate every child over the age of three by the end of 2021. “Argentina will finish 2021 with the full coverage and protection of people aged over 3 years,” health minister Carla Vizzotti vowed in October.

Children and teenagers face virtually no risk of death or serious illness from COVID-19. Between 0-0.03 percent of COVID cases in the United States under age 18 have resulted in death, according to the American Pediatric Association. The survival rate for coronavirus has been estimated at no lower than 99.7 percent for all age groups under 60 years old.

Numerous deaths and serious injuries, including heart inflammation and other cardiac issues, have been reported in children soon after a COVID jab. VAERS, the vaccine injury tracking system of the U.S. government, has reported dozens of cases of children dying within days of vaccination.

A 15-year-old boy in California with no underlying health conditions died of stress cardiomyopathy last year, two days after his second Pfizer injection, mirroring a similar incident in Michigan. In Texas, a 16-year-old died five days after his first dose of the Pfizer shot in April, suffering from an enlarged heart double its normal size, his father said.

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Quick note: Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here. We will not waver. We will not tire. We will not falter, and we will not fail. Freedom will prevail.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here — it’s free and it’s critical NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America’s survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow me on Gettr. I am there, click here. It’s open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

VIDEO: Monica Smit on ‘Gulag Australia’ thumbnail

VIDEO: Monica Smit on ‘Gulag Australia’

/in , , /by

By Jamie Glazov

VIDEO: Monica Smit on ‘Gulag Australia’ – Dr. Rich Swier

Copyright © 2021 DrRichSwier.com LLC. A Florida Cooperation. All rights reserved. The DrRichSwier.com is a not-for-profit news forum for intelligent Conservative commentary. Opinions expressed by writers are solely their own. Republishing of columns on this website requires the permission of both the author and editor. For more information contact: drswier@gmail.com.

The Snakes and Devils of the Abortion Biz thumbnail

The Snakes and Devils of the Abortion Biz

/in , , , , /by

By The Daily Skirmish – Liberato.US

Today, we pick up with exposing the wretched Left and Democrats and their despicable methods.

Turning now to abortion, Planned Parenthood in Chicago failed to report sex abuse against an underage girl.  A former middle school principal drove the girl from Indiana, with whom he was sexually involved, to get an abortion.  Planned Parenthood had to know something was not right when a grown man shows up with an underage girl, but they didn’t report the abuser to the police, as far as anyone knows.  This is really not surprising when you consider repeated reports Planned Parenthood pushes abortions on girls as young as 11, without their parents’ knowledge or consent.

Evidence suggests abortion clinics do not routinely screen for whether expectant mothers are being pressured into having an abortion by partners, parents, employers, or others.  This can result, as in a recent case in Argentina, with the woman not being allowed to leave the hospital and the abortion being performed without her consent.

Abortion activists are trying to get around the new abortion laws in Texas by transporting pregnant women to Mexico and smuggling dangerous abortion pills into the U.S.   They openly state they do not care if this makes them criminals.

Claims that large numbers of women die in back-alley abortions where abortion is illegal have been debunked, again.  The architect of Roe v. Wade, Dr. Bernard Nathanson, admitted he repeatedly told the press the number was 10,000 when the true number was closer to 200.  Now the WHO has been caught lumping in miscarriages to overstate the number of deaths arising from illegal abortions.

Abortion advocates use dishonest poll results to hoodwink people into thinking abortion is popular.  In one poll, people were asked if they support or oppose a law banning abortions after a heartbeat is detected.  58 percent responded they oppose, but that would include people who oppose the law because they want abortion banned BEFORE a heartbeat is detected.

If abortion advocates get their way, medical schools would be forced to teach students how to perform abortions.  This is because so few doctors want any part of this dirty business.

A Planned Parenthood clinic in Pennsylvania has denied it performs abortions, but state records show it is conducting telemedicine abortions involving abortion pills, or plans to do so.

A liberal foundation played a key role in getting abortion pills approved and distributed, but they did it in the service of a hidden agenda – population control.  They’re not the only ones with a hidden agenda.  The late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said in 2009 that Medicaid funding for abortion would limit population growth in poor communities, “populations that we don’t want to have too many of,” in her words.

Covering up for pedophiles.  Evading parents. Lying and making stuff up to feed to the press.  Criminal activity.  Hidden agendas.  To abortion advocates I say, if this is the only way you can win, you don’t deserve to win.  You deserve to lose, and to be condemned for your despicable acts and atrocious attitudes.

Visit The Daily Skirmish

©Christopher Wright. All rights reserved.

Washington Bill Authorizes ‘Strike Force’ To ‘Involuntarily Detain’ Unvaccinated Families: ‘They Have Already Set Up The Internment Camps’ thumbnail

Washington Bill Authorizes ‘Strike Force’ To ‘Involuntarily Detain’ Unvaccinated Families: ‘They Have Already Set Up The Internment Camps’

/in , , , , , , /by

By The Geller Report

This is happening already in previously free countries like Australia. It’s coming.

By: Alicia Powe, Gateway Pundit, January 8, 2022:

The Washington State Board of Health may soon amend state law to authorize the involuntary detainment of residents as young as 5 years old in Covid-19 “internment camps” for failing to comply with the state’s experimental vaccine mandate.

WAC 246-100-040, a proposed revision to include Covid protocol under the state’s Communicable and Certain Other Diseases act, outlines “Procedures for isolation or quarantine.” The measure would allow local health officers at “his other sole discretion” to “issue an emergency detention order causing a person or group of persons to be immediately detained for purposes of isolation or quarantine.”

Health officers are required to provide documentation proving unvaccinated residents subject to detention have denied “requests for medical examination, testing, treatment, counseling, vaccination, decontamination of persons or animals, isolation, quarantine and inspection and closure of facilities” prior to involuntarily confinement in quarantine facilities, the resolution states.

The amended law would also allow health officers to deploy law enforcement officials to assist with the arrest of uncompliant Washington residents.

According to W 246-100-040,  “a local health officer may invoke the powers of police officers, sheriffs, constables, and all other officers and employees of any political subdivisions within the jurisdiction of the health department to enforce immediately orders given to effectuate the purposes of this section in accordance with the provisions of RCW 43.20.050(4) and 70.05.120.”

The “emergency detention order” legalizes the isolation and detainment of American citizens who fail to voluntarily comply with Covid gene therapy shots “for a period not to exceed ten days.”

However, a judge may extend the forced quarantine “for a period not to exceed thirty days” if the segregated individual or family persists to refuse vaccination.

WAC 246-100-040 was certified on October 25, 2019, months prior to  the coronavirus outbreak in the United States. The first confirmed case of Covid in the US was diagnosed in Seattle on January 20, 2020. 

The Washington State Board of Health will hold a virtual public meeting on January 12 to discuss the application of W 246-100-040. 

Scott Miller, a Washington-based Physician Assistant who runs a private pediatric clinic, lost his medical license in October for providing over tw0 thousand critically-ill Covid patients with Ivermectin, vitamins and other effective treatments.

Miller will provide testimony during the WSBH 8-hour Zoom meeting on Wednesday to warn against mandating the experimental shot for children and present data showing acute vaccine-related injuries and fatalities.

Still struggling with the ramifications of having his medical license revoked for saving lives, Miller wonders how many innocent families are going to have to flee the state to find basic freedom that was once ubiquitous in the states if this so-called emergency legislation is passed.

“I was up at 5:30 this morning. I got a call from a woman in Ohio whose husband is day eight [Covid-infected] just crying asking me, ‘Can you please help, we are desperate.’ It is devasting knowing that I could have easily treated him as I had hundreds of people outside of Washington prior to the emergency suspension of my license for prescribing life-saving therapeutics,” Miller told The Gateway Pundit in an exclusive interview. “I can no longer actively help those families in need and it breaks my heart.

“I will frequently reach out to providers around the country that I consider heroes, asking if they will help intervene to save these innocent lives. If only the state medical investigators would look into the ‘quality of care’ or lack thereof within our hospital systems around our nation and question why over 700,000 Americans go to the hospital and never come home,” he said. “Supplemental oxygen and six milligrams of Dexamethasone has proven to be a catastrophic failure in mitigating acute respiratory distress syndrome. Yet, that is the primary treatment protocol across the country, even as patients decompensate and are statistically condemned to mechanical ventilation.

“If this mandate goes through for the kids, it is horrifying. It’s not just to attend school – if a local health department official deems you to be out of compliance, you can be detained against your will. It’s the most reprehensible overreach of emergency power I have ever seen of out of everything that has been imposed on us – they have taken everybody to herd them like cattle, herd them like prisoners into their homes and tell them that this is for our good and the greater good. While the people that made these rules go out to dinner with their friends without masks and get on planes and fly to vacations. They are saying ‘I know it’s going to be hard to be deprived of breathing or miss Christmas with your family this year.’ But they don’t adhere to these mandates. We see pictures of them celebrating holidays in person with thier families. ‘Do as we command, not as we do.’”

The pediatric physician assistant has provided countless mask exemptions for high-risk children with underlying respiratory and neurologic conditions. But exemptions are no longer accepted in the workplace or schools and won’t stop the contact tracers from detaining the non-compliant, Miller warns:

I had written several medical exemptions and mask exemptions for patients with known history of vaccine injury and respiratory issues. In this new unrecognizable America, medical providers are not only barred from appropriately treating thier patients for Covid, but now they are no longer able to provide legitimate medical exemptions, including those that have positive antibody tests. Any provider found writing medical exemptions is at risk for being investigated. State medical investigators will often ignore medical history, charge providers with dissemminating ‘disinformation/misinformation,’ and be deemed unfit to have a medical license.

“The state has prioritized launching investigations into any practitioner that is courageous enough to appropriately care for their patients. If the practitioner’s plan of care diverts from the newly implemented restricted Center for Disease Control guidelines, they are at high risk of losing their license and livelihood.”

The Washington State Board of Health’s decision to conduct the meeting on involuntarily detaining purebloods on a Zoom call rather than a “dangerous” in-person forum makes holding members accountable even more of an uphill battle.

But patriots across Washington are putting pressure on two Republican board members, Gary Medvigy and Karen Dill Bowerman, to do the right thing.

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Quick note: Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here. We will not waver. We will not tire. We will not falter, and we will not fail. Freedom will prevail.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here — it’s free and it’s critical NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America’s survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Why the Bastardization of the Scientific Method Is so Dangerous thumbnail

Why the Bastardization of the Scientific Method Is so Dangerous

/in , , , , /by

By Foundation for Economic Education (FEE)

When married to power, an exaltation of science can have disastrous effects.

Over the past half decade, there has been a growing trend signaling a shift in the perceived and accepted role of science. It is not uncommon to see slogans and mottos such as “the science is settled” and “believe in science.”

Statements like this present two major problems: first, science is determined to be final and indisputable; second, it is accompanied by a value or moral judgment. For example, scientific studies indicate that wearing a helmet can reduce head injury by 48%, serious head injury by 60%, traumatic brain injury by 53%, [and] face injury by 23%.”

While it takes little effort to align with science on such a matter, I intend to demonstrate that an application of the first behavior is contradictory to the foundation of science and the second lies entirely outside its purview.

To establish common ground, we begin by reviewing the merits and fundamentals of the scientific method. First, an observation is made, followed by a question regarding the observation. A hypothesis is then formed that could potentially answer the question. A prediction about future results based on the hypothesis is then tested via experiments. Analysis of the results of the experiments are utilized to confirm or reject the hypothesis. If the results seem to demonstrate that the hypothesis is correct, then confidence begins to build in the predictive power of the hypothesis and its ability to describe the real world. If the results seem to demonstrate that the hypothesis is incorrect, then the scientific method loops back on itself and the hypothesis is challenged, refined, modified, or discarded. The process is rigorous, thorough, and exacting. It is also deeply empirical, meaning it relies on information from the real world; it can only extract data from things that have already happened. In its most basic form, this process is what constitutes “science” as commonly referred to in media and conversation.

With common ground established, the first major problem can be addressed. It is, ironically, anti-science to ever declare that science is settled. There are a few characteristics of the scientific method that substantiate this claim. Since the scientific method is based on empirical data in relation to a hypothesis, it is reliant on the senses and perceived experiences. This means it is wholly dependent on the past. Science cannot properly predict the future; it can only model what has happened and make a reasonable projection about what could happen. Scientific law hangs on statistical probability.

In addition, since man is not omniscient, the future will forever remain unknown. As man continues to explore the physical world, there always exists the possibility that enough data will accumulate to falsify, or at least cast into doubt, a well-established scientific conclusion. Because of these conditions, statements declaring the science to be settled are altogether unscientific: they reject the core principles and practices of the scientific method and the nature of human experience. Such conditions expose the ridiculousness of any insinuation that science is settled. Strictly speaking, science is unable to ever be settled. Imagine the carnage if scientists around the world had retired their lab coats and accepted the alleged “clinical proof” that certain cigarettes were not actually harmful or medically superior to other brands. Fortunately, continued use of the scientific method has built a compelling counterargument that cigarettes are in fact very detrimental to the body.

The second major problem may have more perilous implications when thoroughly examined. In the preceding discussion, it is clearly shown that science is only able to approach statistical truth based on empirical evidence. Science is, however, utterly unable to tell us what is right or wrong. There is nothing naturally occurring within the scientific method that empowers it to make value judgments or moral decisions. It cannot tell us what is good, bad, better, or worse. In essence, science is never able to say “should” or “must.” To return to our previous example, science may conclude that wearing a helmet prevents head injuries in motorbike accidents, but it is powerless to dictate that motorists should wear helmets. To do so is to make a value judgment that can only be made by individuals.

Wearing a helmet is only prescriptive if the individual motorist values the possibility of preventing a cracked skull more than riding freely in the wind. Knowing the risks and being informed by science, most motorists would likely choose to wear a helmet, but science is unable to tell them that is the choice of highest value, since individuals have different, and differing, value systems. In regards to science, what is right is dependent on the precise ends desired by individual actors and their values.

As Austrian economist Ludwig von Mises stated, “There is no use in arguing about the adequacy of ethical precepts…. Ultimate ends are chosen by the individual’s judgments of value. They cannot be determined by scientific inquiry and logical reasoning.”

Allowing science to make universal value judgments also enables it to define morality. An example of this can be found in the debates surrounding abortion law. Science can tell us when a heartbeat begins, how developed a baby is in the first, second, and third trimester, and even the sex of the baby. But again, it is absolutely powerless to tell us whether it is or is not moral to abort the baby. Such an evaluation would rest on the value judgments and moral code of the individual.

The issue, then, with slogans like “believe in science” is the tendency to conflate science with morality and value. When science is wielded to make laws, it is most often done with a moral code attached. It has been shown that science is not able to do this, so the only way science can be used to make law is for someone, some real person or persons somewhere, to draw a moral conclusion based on the science. This personal, individual moral conclusion is then applied wholesale upon all that the law will reach. It is for this reason that science should never be used as a justification in any government action to enforce moral systems.

Doing so results in the morals and values of the few being imposed upon the many. But it is only individuals who can make decisions about what they will do in regard to any scientific consensus. F.A. Hayek put this neatly when he said that “individuals should be allowed … to follow their own values and preferences rather than somebody else’s.”

The results of any scientific study require interpretation, and any interpretation is necessarily subjective. The interpretation of results may go on to inform value judgments and moral codes. But if science moves into a space where its conclusions can never be challenged and it also determines morality, then it suddenly ceases to exhibit characteristics of science and has assumed characteristics of religion.

When conveniently married to power, an exaltation of science to this status can have disastrous effects, as evidenced by the acts committed by the Third Reich and other totalitarian regimes.

“Science cannot lie, for it’s always striving, according to the momentary state of knowledge, to deduce what is true,” Hitler famously asserted.

The further scientists drift from the scientific method to tell people what they should do, the more they undermine science and increase the potential to restrict choice, destroy human liberty, and harm real people.

It should always be remembered that while science can tell us that a phone will carry our voices through the air, it will never be able to tell us what should be said.

COLUMN BY

Mike Roberts

Mike Roberts is a process engineer at Intel with a Bachelor’s in Chemical Engineering and a Master’s in Mechanical Engineering. He is also a life-long advocate of free markets and free ideas.

EDITORS NOTE: This FEE column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

WC4BL: Doctors Stop Practicing Medicine Now Treat Patients Based Solely on Race thumbnail

WC4BL: Doctors Stop Practicing Medicine Now Treat Patients Based Solely on Race

/in , , , , /by

By Dr. Rich Swier

“I swear by Apollo the physician, and Aesculapius, and Health, and All-heal, and all the gods and goddesses, that, according to my ability and judgment, I will keep this Oath and this stipulation—to reckon him who taught me this Art equally…” – Hippocratic Oath (c. 400 BC) as translated from Greek by Francis Adams (1849).

“The more we do to you, the less you seem to believe we are doing it.” –  Dr. Josef Mengele German Schutzstaffel (SS) officer and physician, as quoted in Surfing the Tao : A Revolution of Free Will (2004) by Angela V. Michaels.

“White Coats for Black Lives (WC4BL) aims to dismantle racism in medicine and fight for the health of Black people and other people of color.” – WC4BL website.

We now are seeing doctors and other medical professionals who only treat patients based on their race and not on the patients’ medical needs. Equality is gone in medicine. How do we know this?

Let’s look at a group calling themselves White Coats 4 Black Lives (WC4BL). The mission of WC4BL, according to their website, reads:

To dismantle racism and accompanying systems of oppression in health, while simultaneously cultivating means for collective liberation that center the needs, priorities, and self-determination of Black people and other people of color, particularly those most marginalized in our communities. [Emphasis added]

We were astounded when we read the WC4BL values and vision document. The WC4BL document reads in part:

Medical practice in the U.S. is informed by race as a political system, and works to legitimize race through false biological arguments. The very existence of American chattel slavery relied on scientific and medical justifications for Black inferiority. Race was created as a tool for exploitation by white people who placed themselves at the top of their invented racial hierarchy, in opposition to Blackness in particular. [Emphasis added]

After reading the WC4BL values and vision document we were reminded of the words of President John F. Kennedy given at a Commencement Address at Yale University on June 11 1962:

“The great enemy of truth is very often not the lie–deliberate, contrived and dishonest–but the myth–persistent, persuasive and unrealistic. Too often we hold fast to the clichés of our forebears. We subject all facts to a prefabricated set of interpretations. We enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”

Are the leaders and chapter members of WC4BL engaged in spreading myths that are persistent, persuasive and unrealistic?

WC4BL Chapters in American Medical Schools

WC4BL website states: Active White Coats for Black Lives chapters are listed below, along with their contact information. Want to start a chapter at your medical school or hospital? Check out our Chapter Guide to learn more.

Here’s the list of WC4BL Chapters:

Bastyr University (Kenmore, WA) – bukwc4bl@gmail.com

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Boston, MA) – bidmc.wc4bl@gmail.com

Burrell College of Osteopathic Medicine (University Park, NM) – bcomwc4bl@gmail.com

Chicago Health Coalition for Black Lives (Chicago, IL) – chc4bl@gmail.com

Chicago Medical School at Rosalind Franklin University (North Chicago, IL) – rfuwc4bl@gmail.com, https://sites.google.com/my.rfums.org/rfumsalliesforblacklives/home

College of Human Medicine at Michigan State University (East Lansing, MI) – msuchmwc4bl@gmail.com

College of Osteopathic Medicine at Kansas City University (Kansas City, MO) – KCUWc4bl@gmail.com

Creighton University School of Medicine (Omaha, NE) – creightonwc4bl@gmail.com

East Carolina University Brody School of Medicine (Greenville, NC) – brodywc4bl@gmail.com

Eastern Virginia Medical School (Norfolk, VA) – evmswc4bl@gmail.com

Florida State University College of Medicine (Tallahassee, FL) – fsuwc4bl@gmail.com

Frank H. Netter School of Medicine (North Haven, CT) – netterWC4BL@gmail.com

Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth (Hanover, NH) – dartmouthwc4bl@gmail.com

Georgetown University School of Medicine (Washington, D.C.) – georgetownwc4bl@gmail.com

GW School of Medicine and Health Sciences (Washington, D.C.) – gwuwc4bl@gmail.com

Kaiser Northern California (CA) – kaisernorcalwc4bl@gmail.com

Kansas University School of Medicine (Kansas City, KS) – KUMCwhitecoats4blacklives@gmail.com

Lincoln Memorial University DeBusk College of Osteopathic Medicine (Harrogate, TN) – lmudcomwc4bl@gmail.com

Louisiana State University School of Medicine (New Orleans, LA) – lsu.nola.WC4BL@gmail.com

Loyola University Chicago Stricht School of Medicine (Maywood, IL) – whitecoats4blacklives.stritch@gmail.com

Massachusetts General Hospital (Boston, MA) – MGHWC4BL@gmail.com

McGill University – Faculty of Medicine (Montreal, Quebec) – mcgillwc4bl@gmail.com

McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas at Houston Health Science Center (Houston, TX) – uthwc4bl@gmail.com

Medical College of Georgia (Augusta, GA) – mcgwc4bl@gmail.com

Meharry Medical College (Nashville, TN) – meharrywc4bl@gmail.com

Morsani College of Medicine at the University of South Florida (Tampa, FL) – usf.wc4bl@gmail.com

New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine (Old Westbury, NY) – nyitcom.wc4bl@gmail.com

Northwestern Medicine (Chicago, IL) – NorthwesternMedicineWC4BL@gmail.com

Nova Southeastern University Fort Lauderdale (Fort Lauderdale, FL) – novaftl.wc4bl@gmail.com

Oregon Health & Science University (Portland, OR) – orwc4bl@gmail.com

PCOM South Georgia (Moultrie, GA) PCOM SGA – pcomsga.wc4bl@gmail.com

Penn State College of Medicine (Hershey, PA) – pscomwc4bl@gmail.com

Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine (Philadelphia, PA) – pcomwc4bl@gmail.com

Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine (Iowa City, IA) – uiowaWC4BL@gmail.com

Rush University Medical College (Chicago, IL) – rushuniversitywc4bl@gmail.com

Rutgers New Jersey Medical School (Newark, NJ) – rwjmswc4bl@gmail.com

School of Medicine – University of Mississippi Medical Center (Jackson, MS) – mississippisomwc4bl@gmail.com

Sidney Kimmel Medical College – Thomas Jefferson University (Philadelphia, PA) – jeffersonwc4bl@gmail.com

Southwest College of Naturopathic Medicine (Tempe, AZ) – scnmwc4bl@gmail.com

St. George’s University (True Blue, Grenada) – st.georgeswc4bl@gmail.com

TCU and UNTHSC School of Medicine (Fort Worth, TX) – tcu.unthsc.wc4bl@gmail.com

Texas Tech Health Science Center El Paso (El Paso, TX) – FosterSOMWC4BL@gmail.com

The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine (Chicago, IL) – wc4blpritzker@gmail.com

Touro College of Medicine (New York, NY) – tourocomharlemwc4bl@gmail.com

Tufts University School of Medicine (Boston, MA) – tuftswc4bl@gmail.com

UAB School of Medicine (Birmingham, AL) – uasom.wc4bl@gmail.com

UC Davis School of Medicine (Sacramento, CA) – wc4bl.ucdsom@gmail.com

UMass Medical School (Worcester, MA) – wc4blumms@gmail.com

UNC School of Medicine (Chapel Hill, NC) – uncsomwc4bl@gmail.com

University at Buffalo Residency Programs (Buffalo, NY) – ubresidentswc4bl@gmail.com

University of Arizona College of Medicine (Tucson, AZ) – uacompwc4bl@gmail.com

University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (Little Rock, AR) – uamswc4bl@gmail.com

University of Colorado School of Medicine (Aurora, CO) – cusomwhitecoats4blacklives@gmail.com

University of Illinois College of Medicine – Chicago (Chicago, IL) – UIWC4BL@gmail.com

University of Kentucky College of Medicine (Lexington, KY) – ukcom.wcfbl@gmail.com

University of Maryland School of Medicine (Baltimore, MD) – umaryland.wc4bl@gmail.com

University of Michigan Medical School (Ann Arbor, MI) – ummswhitecoats4blacklives@gmail.com

University of Minnesota Medical School (Minneapolis, MN) – whitecoats4blacklivesumn@gmail.com

University of New Mexico (Albuquerque, NM) – wc4bil@gmail.com

University of Pennsylvania Residencies (Philadelphia, PA) – pennresidentswc4bl@gmail.com

University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine (Pittsburgh, PA) – UPSOMWC4BL@gmail.com

University of Rochester School of Medicine (Rochester, NY) – urochesterwc4bl@gmail.com

University of the Pacific (California) – uop.wc4bl@gmail.com

University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences (Toledo, OH) – utcomwhitecoats4blacklives@gmail.com

University of Utah School of Medicine (Salt Lake City, UT) – uusomWC4BL@gmail.com

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine (Madison, WI) – UWSMPHWC4BL@gmail.com

Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons at Columbia University (New York, NY) – columbiawc4bl@gmail.com

Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University (Providence, RI) – whitecoats4blacklivesams@gmail.com

Washington University School of Medicine (St. Louis, MO)

Weill Cornell Medicine (New York, NY) – wcmwc4bl@gmail.com

Westchester Medical Center (Valhalla, NY) – wmc.wc4bl@gmail.com

Western University of Health Sciences (Lebanon, OR) – WesternUPomWC4BL@gmail.com

Western University of Health Sciences (Pomona, CA) – WC4BLLebanon@westernu.edu

Wright State University – Boonshoft School of Medicine (Fairborn, OH) – WC4BLwsubsom@gmail.com

Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra University (Hempstead, NY) – zsomwc4bl@gmail.com

It appears that WC4BL is creating the next generation of doctors bent on using race as a primary goal of practicing and giving healthcare.

The Bottom Line

WC4BL believes:

Our job is two-fold: 1) dismantling dominant, exploitative systems in the United States, which are largely reliant on anti-Black racism, colonialism, cisheteropatriarchy, white supremacy, and capitalism; and 2) rebuilding a future that supports the health and well-being of marginalized communities.

Doctors are trained in their specialty to provide their services to all of their patients regardless of race. When healthcare becomes political, healthcare suffers and patients suffer. When healthcare becomes a weapon to “dismantling dominant, exploitive systems in the United States” then medicine and doctors have become “fundamentally transformed” into political activists. We have seen doctors become agents of the state before, think of German Schutzstaffel (SS) officer and physician Dr. Josef Mengele who became the Nazi Party’s “angle of death.”

Hate for America, hate for those who believe that gender is binary (male and female), hate of capitalism, hate of whites are not about treating those who need treatment. There appears to be a Marxist based movement that’s now taking over the medical profession and some medical schools.

This movement is dangerous, unhealthy and can only lead to the destruction of the medical profession.

Medicine has become weaponized for political purposes.

In our column “The Rise of the Bio-Medical Security State” we wrote:

In February 1920, Hitler presented a 25-point Program (the Nazi Party Platform) at a Nazi Party meeting. In the 25-point program, Nazi Party members publicly declared their intention to segregate Jews from “Aryan” society and to abrogate Jews’ political, legal and civil rights.

Fast forward to January 2022 and we now see a Democrat Party Platform, enforced by federal bureaucrats, Democrat members of Congress and party leaders, to segregate the “unvaccinated” from “American” society and to abrogate the political, legal and civil rights of the unvaxxed.

Now, sadly, we can add doctors to the ranks of the Bio-Medical Security State.

Next time you visit your doctor ask if they are a member of WC4BL. If their answer is yes then you may want to find another doctor.

Sad, but true.

©Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLES:

‘White Coats for Black Lives’ Calling the Shots at America’s Medical Schools

Biden Administration Cuts Florida’s Weekly Monoclonal Shipment in Half

STAY INFORMED

Receive regular news, commentary, and analysis straight to your inbox.

POWERED BY

DrRichSwier.com | ThePricklyPear.org

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.