EXCLUSIVE: Trump Admin Moves To Revoke Tax Exempt Status For Racially Discriminatory Schools

By The Daily Caller

The Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) are expected to roll out regulations that would end the federal tax-exempt status for private schools that discriminate on the basis of race rather than rewarding merit, the Daily Caller learned.

The Treasury and the IRS will issue the proposed regulations Thursday based on President Donald Trump’s executive orders that aim to restore merit and end discriminatory practices, an administration official told the Caller.

This rule would apply to private schools that participate in racially discriminatory practices across admissions, scholarships, athletics, loans, educational policies, and other school-administered programs. The rule could affect as many as 18,000 private schools, the official told the Caller.

There are several well-documented instances of race-based discrimination in private schooling. The Department of Justice (DOJ) review of internal policies, email correspondence, and other publicly available materials found that the Yale University School of Medicine had discriminated based on race in its admissions process. Similar cases of discrimination were found at the George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences as well as the Duke University School of Law.

The IRS and Treasury cited longstanding Supreme Court precedents set in Brown v. Board of Education, Bob Jones University v. United States, and Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard.

Although these cases established precedent to eliminate tax-exempt status based on an institution’s discriminatory status, the proposal allows private schools to maintain certain curricula and observances based on genuine religious affiliation.

Schools would still be able to expand educational and assistance programs for students using criteria based on income, geographic location, individual hardship, first-generation status, military status, or academic achievement, so long as it is race-neutral.

This rule would apply to taxable years beginning May 31, 2027.

AUTHOR

Rebeka Zeljko

National Correspondent

RELATED ARTICLE: Here’s How Trump Has Put ‘Radical’ DEI In The ‘Dustbin’ Throughout 2025

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Other K-12 Teachers Speak Out: These Good People are the Tip of the Iceberg

By John Droz, Jr.

This very short video recently became viral…

WATCH: High school teacher broke down in tears after realizing his students couldn’t read or write

After that, this middle school teacher starts out by referencing that now well-known article where a Texas K-12 teacher breaks down in tears describing the pathetic state of current students…

WATCH: Middle school teacher shares what’s causing literacy crisis

How many more of these will it take for you to not only understand the horrific state of affairs we are in, but to do some thing meaningful about it?

©2026 All rights reserved.


Here is other information from this scientist that you might find interesting:

I urge all readers to subscribe to AlterAI — IMO the absolute best AI option for subjective questions.

I will consider posting reader submissions on Critical Thinking about my topics of interest.

My commentaries are my opinion about the material discussed therein, based on the information I have. If any readers have different information, please share it. If it is credible, I will be glad to reconsider my position.

Check out the Archives of this Critical Thinking substack.

C19Science.info is my one-page website that covers the lack of genuine Science behind our COVID-19 policies.

Election-Integrity.info is my one-page website that lists multiple major reports on the election integrity issue.

WiseEnergy.org is my multi-page website that discusses the Science (or lack thereof) behind our energy options.

Media Balance Newsletter: a free, twice-a-month newsletter that covers what the mainstream media does not do, on issues from climate to COVID, elections to education, renewables to religion, etc. Here are the Newsletter’s 2026 Archives. Please send me an email to get your free copy. When emailing me, please make sure to include your full name and the state where you live. (Of course, you can cancel the Media Balance Newsletter at any time!)

Mamdani’s Educational Panel Appointees: Anti-Police Activists and Anti-Israel Ideologues Gain

By Canary Mission

Two appointees signed an anti-NYPD school-safety agenda. Others bring anti-Israel activism into the body governing New York City schools.

Mayor Zohran Mamdani has installed a new bloc of appointees on New York City’s Panel for Educational Policy (PEP), placing figures with documented anti-police positions, anti-Israel activism and campaign-network ties inside the decision-making body that governs the nation’s largest public-school system.

Two appointees, Lucas Koehler and Courtney Rajwani, both former officials in the Department of Education’s (DOE) Division of Early Childhood Education, appear on the same public signature list that supports demands to sever DOE-NYPD ties and to consider non-police alternatives to school safety.

The ties between the NYPD and the DOE center heavily on public school safety, with the NYPD overseeing thousands of unarmed School Safety Agents. The current agreement’s central principle is that routine student misbehavior should be addressed educationally, with police intervention minimized whenever safety permits.

Both Koehler and Rajwani also advocate for “racial-affinity spaces” to be created in schools. These are intentionally segregated, race-specific gatherings.

Another appointee, Dr. Madeline “Maddy” Fox signed a letter accusing Israel of conducting a “genocidal” campaign in Gaza while disputing claims of a widespread campus antisemitism crisis. Raysa Segura Rodriguez leads an organization with a police-out-of-schools agenda. Mehrain Mahdi was involved in Mamdani campaign organizing before receiving her appointment.

The appointments illustrate how the DSA’s political project advances after an election: activists and aligned institutional figures move from campaigning and advocacy into positions with power over budgets, policy and public life, from which they advocate for DSA’s radical policies.

On August 8, 2026, the New York Post reported that Mamdani had appointed anti-police and anti-Israel figures to the PEP. The article cited Canary Mission’s findings.

A Board With Power Over New York City Schools

The Panel for Educational Policy votes on key contracts, education policy and other decisions affecting New York City’s public schools. The mayor appointed 13 of the 24 members—enough to shape the body’s direction. According to Chalkbeat, the appointments cement “his control over the panel that votes on major policy changes, contracts, and decisions to merge or close schools.”

Lucas Koehler

Lucas Koehler is a former seventh-grade math teacher and a former senior finance and operations official in the DOE’s early-childhood division. He is now chief financial officer of the Foundation for City College, where his official biography says he oversees financial management connected to an endowment of approximately $500 million.

Koehler’s signature appeared on the Division of Early Childhood Education (DECE) coalition materials (see below) and on the Bureaucrats for Black Lives (B4BL) public signature page.

B4BL called for eliminating admissions screens and tests and “anti-oppressive approaches” in DOE hiring and policymaking.

Bureaucrats for Black Lives was an activist network of NYC Department of Education employees who explicitly committed to pursuing anti-racism through their official roles within the agency. Its public materials called for shifting funding from the NYPD, eliminating admissions screens and tests, scrutinizing racial disparities in hiring, using racial-affinity spaces and dismantling what it described as oppressive systems within government.

According to the advocacy group, DOE bureaucracy should actively dismantle systems it considers oppressive. B4BL says members seek to understand their institution in order to “dismantle these systems of oppression.”

Koehler combines control of large education and nonprofit budgets with the appointee slate’s clearest personal anti-police record. That makes his position on school-safety-agent funding and governance especially relevant.

Courtney Rajwani

Courtney Rajwani is a managing consultant at The Lewin Group. She previously served as an executive director for policy development and support in the DOE early-childhood division.

Rajwani and Koehler signed on to the DECE Anti-Racism Coalition letter. The anti-racism coalition’s published demands call for severing all ties between the DOE and the NYPD. Its letter also attacked what it called the NYPD’s “unchecked abuses of power.”

Additional demands include “Dismantling White Dominant Culture.” This is to be achieved, in part, by:

  • “Create separate spaces for white people and non-Black people of color to interrogate their own internalized anti-Black racism and unlearn white dominant behaviors without causing harm to Black colleagues.”
  • “Acknowledge the pain by providing space for Black and brown colleagues to heal.”
  • “Host forums to foster conversations around race, class, gender, education, sexual orientation, and other identities.”
CCNY_Lucas_Koehler_2023_5_cropped.jpgcourtney.jpgMehrain.jpgMadeline-Fox.webpRaysa.jpg

Mehrain Mahdi

Mehrain Mahdi, a Solutions Delivery Lead at Amwell, was an active volunteer who campaigned for Mamdani with the groups Moms for Mamdani and Shias for Zohran.

In a public Telegram statement written by Alex Abbasi, she was named as a member of the Shias for Zohran organizing committee. Canary Mission documented Abbasi calling for intifada (Abbasi wrote “Death to Zionism! Long live the intifada”) and supporting terrorism.

The message thanked the committee collectively for canvassing, phone-banking, fundraising and recruiting support for Mamdani’s mayoral campaign. The statement separately thanked CAIR Action for infrastructure and campaign-law guidance.

Overall, Shias for Zohran claimed to raise over $500,000 for Mamdani’s campaign.

Following her efforts on behalf of Mamdani, Mahdi was appointed by the mayor to a position with decision-making power.

Screenshot 2026-08-10 054406.png

Instagram post from Oct 26, 2025 from Shias for Zohran account praising Mehrain Mahdi

Dr. Maddy Fox

Dr. Maddy Fox is a Brooklyn College associate professor and a faculty member in urban education and critical psychology at the CUNY Graduate Center. Fox’s public record combines anti-Israel advocacy with scholarship focused on policing and inequality.

Fox signed a 2025 Jewish-faculty letter that described Israel’s campaign in Gaza as “genocidal,” disputed claims of a “rampant crisis of antisemitism” on college campuses and accused government efforts against campus antisemitism of repression, racism and Islamophobia.

She also co-authored research on young New Yorkers’ experiences with aggressive policing and later participated in a CUNY labor protest at which she and other union members were arrested.

Raysa S. Rodriguez

Raysa S. Rodriguez is the executive director of Citizens’ Committee for Children of New York (CCC) and adjunct professor at Columbia University’s School of Social Work.

Before Rodriguez became executive director, CCC published testimony urging the city to redirect $350 million from school policing, freeze school-police hiring and reject expanded surveillance. A later CCC statement again supported shifting funds away from school policing.

Mamdani appointed the leader of an influential organization with a sustained police-out-of-schools agenda.

The DSA Model Moves Into the School System

Mamdani’s PEP appointments include officials whose previously stated positions on school policing closely align with positions advanced by both NYC-DSA and National DSA. Both have explicitly called for the removal of police from schools in the past.

NYC-DSA has explicitly called “to get the NYPD Out of Schools.” In 2020, the chapter sponsored a march to “get the NYPD Out of Schools,” calling for “our city to divest from the NYPD, remove NYPD oversight of school safety employees, and invest heavily in more restorative justice coordinators, social workers, nurses, teachers, and school counselors.”

At its 2021 national convention, DSA adopted a political platform calling for the removal of both public and private police from all schools, colleges and universities. Under the section titled, “Abolition of the Carceral State,” DSA demanded: “Decarcerate our schools by repealing truancy laws, ending all zero tolerance disciplinary policies, suspensions and expulsions, surveillance of students, and removing police — both public and private — from all schools, colleges, and universities.”

DSA’s new 2026 national program called for steps toward “fully abolishing the police and prison system.”

Mamdani’s appointments are not merely personnel choices. They reveal the governing coalition he is building around New York City schools: officials tied to anti-police advocacy, anti-Israel activism, progressive nonprofits and the political network that helped put him in office.

The PEP is where ideology can become policy. Its members can influence contracts, school closures, spending priorities, school-safety arrangements and the direction of the public-school system.

This is the larger pattern Canary Mission has documented in its investigation of NYC-DSA’s governing strategy: activist networks do not stop at electing candidates. They seek influence over the institutions that control budgets, policy and public life. Mamdani’s PEP appointments show what that model looks like when it reaches the school system.

©2026 . All rights reserved.

Welcome News From Saudi Arabia

By Jihad Watch

It seems that the Saudis have rewritten their textbooks to squeeze out every last drop of antisemitism. I don’t know why the Saudis are doing this, though I will speculate below on possible reasons. I’m sure the religious establishment is furious with Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman, the onlie begetter of this change, but in Saudi Arabia, MbS calls the shots, and this good news deserves to be disseminated. More on this change can be found here: “Saudi Arabia Removes Virtually All Antisemitism From School Curricula, New Report Finds,” by Dion J. Pierre, Algemeiner, August 17, 2026:

Saudi Arabia is continuing to implement major reforms of its sprawling system of 35,000 public Islamic education schools, according to a new report by the Institute for which says government officials have scoured virtually all antisemitic content from curricula and textbooks assigned to Saudi youth.

The Institute for Monitoring Peace and Cultural Tolerance in School Education (Impact-se), which analyzes school curricula around the world, examined 136 textbooks as part of its study. The nonprofit organization found that the trend of moderation offers a glimpse of how Saudi Arabia imagines its future, one in which less popular suspicion of Israel, Jews, and the US facilitates increased cooperation with the West and draws continued support for its ongoing “Vision 2030” initiative to modernize the country’s economy and culture.

“Saudi textbooks published for the 2025/26 school year continue the kingdom’s sustained program of educational reform, further advancing moderation, coexistence, and critical thinking,” Impact-se CEO Marcus Sheff said in a statement on Monday, following the announcement of the main findings of his organization’s exhaustive review and translation of thousands of pages of content. “The curriculum is now entirely free of antisemitic content, with the final few remaining examples removed. In fact, Saudi curriculum has never been more positive in its portrayal of religious minorities or more encouraging of peace and tolerance.”…

It is not only antisemitic passages that have been “squeezed out” of Saudi textbooks. There is also active encouragement of positive views of other non-Muslims — Christians, Hindus, Zoroastrians. MbS wants to prepare his subjects for being part of the modern world, ready and able to interact with, collaborate with, find common ground with, not be locked in perennial war with, the 6.2 billion people in the world (out of a total world population of 8 billion) who are not Muslims.

“The reports also found further progress in the curriculum’s portrayal of Israel, including the removal of content describing Zionism as a ‘racist European movement,’ and falsely accusing Zionists of the 1969 al-Aqsa Mosque arson,” the report said. “In addition to the removal of problematic content, new textbooks promoting values of peace and tolerance were also introduced.”

For years, the Arabs have been accusing “the Jews” of being behind the attempted arson at the Al-Aqsa Mosque in 1969. Jews had nothing to do with it. A crazed Australian tourist was responsible, and now Saudi textbooks have removed that source of Muslim anger with “the Jews” by properly assigning blame to the mentally disturbed Australian.

Israel and Saudi Arabia are quietly cooperating on security matters because they face a common enemy — the Islamic Republic of Iran. Furthermore, the Saudis are opposed to Hamas, which they rightly regard as an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood, an organization that is opposed to the Gulf Arab monarchies and wants them replaced with theocratic states.

Part of the motivation for this “cleansing of the textbooks” in Saudi Arabia is the desire to win favor in Washington, which the Saudis still rely on for their security, including supplies of advanced weaponry. The Saudis also want to ensure that the Americans will assist them in their civilian nuclear energy program.

The UAE is still far ahead of other Muslim states, actively encouraging better relations between Arabs and Jews, and stressing examples in Islamic history when Muhammad treated Jews well (his visit to that sick Jewish child). It also insists that fanatical Muslims are a threat to the Emirates’ prosperity. Finally, the UAE has put the “question of Palestine” on the backburner, and no longer insists that “settling the Palestinian question” should be the sine qua non before other issues, including a possible peace treaty with Israel, are resolved.

Now the Saudis are intent on following the UAE example. They have squeezed the antisemitism out of their schoolbooks. Could Riyadh now go so far as to join the Abraham Accords, to which the UAE belongs, without any longer insisting on the establishment first of a Palestinian state? Let us hope.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Woman converts to Islam, plots to bomb New York Capitol building

Ceuta: Spanish police investigate 15 Muslim migrant sex assaults, including one of 10-year-old girl

Israel Takes Over Building UNRWA Had Been Using in East Jerusalem

UAE paid $50 million hostage ransom to al-Qaeda, money financed jihad in West Africa

Nigeria: Muslims murder 30 in jihad raid on Christian village as people were in churches

IDF strikes Hamas commanders in Gaza cafe who were planning attacks on Israel

Israel Moves to Protect Itself From Turkish Aggression

Syria admits holding nuclear material, but refuses handover, saying: ‘We have the right to use it’

U.S. slams Israeli strikes on Syrian base as ‘unnecessary escalation,’ but which side is really escalating?

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Education and Marxism

By Jerry Newcombe, D. Min.

How is it that so many young Americans have come to espouse Marxist ideas and want to impose them, even by force if necessary, on the rest of us?

Marxism has the most abysmal track record imaginable. How could it be so popular?

The answer is the schools. Not all of them, of course, but many of them. Young Americans for Freedom notes: “A 2025 Cato Institute survey found that 62 percent of Americans ages 18–29 view socialism favorably. That number would have been unthinkable a generation ago. Rising costs, student debt and economic frustration explain part of that shift. But there is another factor that cannot be ignored: The current higher education system.”.

Look at the example of Islamic influencer Hasan Piker, with some 3-million followers, who says that America deserved 9/11. He espouses many other radical views.

Piker is the nephew of Cenk Uygur, founder of “The Young Turks.” (In 2008, I was sand-bagged as a guest on that program to discuss a book I co-wrote with D. James Kennedy, How Would Jesus Vote? The main thing I remember from that interview was that Cenk questioned whether Jesus even existed, which is absurd).

Piker has a close relationship with Michigan senatorial candidate Abdulrahman Mohammed El-Sayed of Michigan. In Townhall.com, Amy Curtis writes: “In short, [Piker’s] a de facto spokesman for the Democrats, even if some of them bristle at the idea.”

In his 8/11/26 End of Day Report, Gary Bauer of the Reagan administration assembled some of Piker’s eye-opening statements.

Says Piker, El-Sayed’s close associate:

  • “Hamas is a thousand times better than a fascist settler colonial apartheid state. . . I would vote for Hamas over Israel every single time.”
  • “Left-wingers and liberals, you need to be f***ing showing your opponents [conservatives] guts… You need to be gutting them. You need to be shanking these motherf***ers and letting their intestines just writhe on stage. … Slice ’em up.”
  • “We’re gonna keep bringing in immigrants to this country—on purpose—so they can f*** your sister and then maybe even your daughter. We’re going to destroy the White race, b*tch. That’s what we’re here to do.”
  • “Kill those motherf***ers and murder those motherf***ers in the street. Let the streets soak in their f**king red capitalist blood, dude. Kill them.”
  • “I would say China is probably the closest . . . to an example that we should follow and lessons that we should learn from.”

As radical as these statements are, Bauer notes that many college professors are endorsing El-Sayed’s candidacy. Of the 190,000 university professors in our country, 57,000 belong to the AAUP, the American Association of University Professors. And for the first time in their 111 year-old history, the AAUP has finally endorsed a candidate. Who? El-Sayed.

From what heights our educational system has fallen. These days we need to think hard about where we send our young people to college—or even if? They’re not what they used to be.

It’s no secret that the universities were originally founded for Christian purposes. Harvard, named after Rev. John Harvard, was created in 1636 to train ministers of the gospel of Jesus Christ. Yale was founded in 1700 by a group of Congregationalist ministers for same. That school was named after the Puritan benefactor Elihu Yale. Princeton was founded by Presbyterian ministers, and was faithful to the gospel until around 1900. And on it goes.

In his book on Deuteronomy in the “Rational Bible” series of commentaries (on p. 74), Dennis Prager talks about the disaster to education (including our universities) that expelling God has created.

Prager quotes the optimistic atheist Sigmund Freud, who declared in 1927 what glories would come to the world when the universities were no longer obliged to teach about God or the Bible: “Civilization has little to fear from educated people and brain-workers. In them the replacement of religious motives for civilized behaviors by other, secular motives would proceed unobtrusively.”

But Prager observes: “As Freud was to witness within ten years of his statement, civilization had just as much to fear from educated people as from the uneducated. Freud’s fellow Austrian and German intellectuals showed no more moral insight or strength than any other group of Germans or Austrians. Many of them not only supported Nazism, but also, as indicated by the records of the German Medical Association, participated in its atrocities.”

So how does Prager assess all this? “No God, no wisdom.”

America is in desperate need for great revival, and that includes revival in our schools. Charlie Kirk was doing such a great job on our campuses, working toward same—no wonder the left celebrated his death.

Our choice is revival or ruin. As the great Thomas Sowell notes, “Ours may become the first civilization destroyed, not by the power of our enemies, but by the ignorance of our teachers and the dangerous nonsense they are teaching our children. In an age of artificial intelligence, they are creating artificial stupidity.”

©2026 All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Bay Area Parents Sue School District for Mosque Field Trip

California’s K–12 Ethnic Studies Mandate Is an Antisemitic Indoctrination Machine

Far-Left Judge Who Dismissed Harvard Antisemitism Case Was Virulently Anti-Israel, Anti-War Activist, McGovern Campaign Aide

Minnesota’s “Outstanding Refugee” Arrested and Charged with Million Dollar Medicaid Fraud, Tied to Sex Trafficking Ring

The Views of 50 Teachers on How Concerned They Are for Generation Alpha Students

By John Droz, Jr.

This is cross-post of an article that I feel is exceptional. As you read through these recent real-life assessments, consider how important it is for us — that’s you and me — to see that these children are not only proficient in the three R’s, but are also Critical Thinkers. Those would negate everything here.


Recently, Redditor Mark Reels asked, “Teachers of Reddit: Is Gen Alpha really struggling with basic reading, writing, and math skills? If so, what does that look like in your classroom?” Read on to see just how really bad it is.

Note: Click on the link at the end of each quote to see the original — plus there are often quite a few additional good comments made by readers.

1. They refuse to think. I’ve literally had kids in my class not doing any work. When I asked them why, they said, ‘I don’t have a pencil.’ I reminded them that I gave them one when I handed out the assignment, and they said, ‘But I don’t have one.’ I asked them to see if maybe they lost it. Again, no. I told them to look around their desk. Lo and behold, the pencil was six inches from their shoe in the aisle. This is not a one-off. I ALWAYS hand out pencils/supplies with the assignment. EVERY DAY. Multiple kids, so many times, choose not to do basic problem-solving skills. It’s mind-boggling.

moonman_incoming

2. It’s not just basic reading. It’s learned helplessness. I have kids who simply cannot do anything independently. Attention span is part of it, but a lot of them just can’t do it unless told exactly what to do, and yes, even if the directions are on the paper.

DivineArbalest

3. “I’m back in college as a 41-year-old, and I’m doing a summer literature course right now. We have weekly discussion boards, and last week the average grade was 2.6/10 because 90% of the class didn’t read the directions. We had to pick a specific prompt to respond to, and most just wrote about the lecture generally. The prompt involved quoting a passage from the weekly readings and writing 100-150 words about it; the class is not difficult at all. Not being able to follow basic instructions has been a consistent problem with my younger classmates. These are Gen Z kids. I imagine the problem is much worse with Gen Alpha.”

KingCarnivore

4. “My boyfriend works at an after-school program. He is in charge of the nine to 10-year-olds. The other day, he put out board games for them all to play, such as Hungry Hungry Hippo, Sorry, and Twister. He left to do something quickly, and when he came back, they were all sitting there doing nothing. He asked what was wrong, and they all replied that they didn’t know how to read the instructions and couldn’t understand them. There have been times when kids will ask him how to spell ‘cat.’ He’s beyond concerned for these kids.”

powere123

5. “What’s concerning to me as a Gen Z teacher is the lack of independence. They will shut down if their hand is not held through every step. If I say I’m not going to help and I want them to try and figure it out on their own, some will cry. 14-year-olds crying.”

PeachyPesco

6. “I work at a university. You can have a perfectly written guide on how to do something, but unless it’s a video explanation sourced directly into their TikTok, there will be droves of students that don’t know what to do.”

IronGin

7. “Not a teacher, but I work in higher education. We haven’t gotten to Gen Alpha just yet, but OMG, the younger Gen Z kids are in bad shape. They cannot follow verbal **or** written instructions. If an email is more than four sentences long, they will not read any of it, and they require a lot of hand-holding because of this. If it’s longer than a reel, it won’t hold their attention, and the lack of understanding of consequences (like missing deadlines) is infuriating.”

ThatBChauncey

8. “High school teacher here. I just finished a year with the worst junior class I’ve ever taught. The biggest shock for me is how transactional everything has become. First, the number of kids who just refused to work. Students who don’t want to work have always existed, but this felt different. It wasn’t just laziness, bad time management, or hating school. It almost felt like I had a lot of students on ‘strike’ from doing their work. I’d give out the assignment, and then they’d sit back with their hands behind their heads, basically daring me to make them do it. It didn’t matter if the assignment was easy, engaging, or ‘meaningful’; there was a persistent percentage of the class that just refused to even participate. When I tried to address it, the dynamic felt like I was a boss meeting with a union leader for contract negotiations.”

They’ll pitch me ‘compromises’: they’d agree to do one small part of an assignment but expect full credit, or they’d tell me they were taking a break to game for 10 minutes but would ‘get back to me’ after. I remember one pair of girls who regularly sat for 40 goddamn minutes doing absolutely nothing, just waiting to see if I’d ‘make an offer’ to get them moving. When I did speak to them, it was to complain and make demands: sometimes they didn’t like the questions I asked on the paper and wanted new ones, or maybe they timed me speaking for seven minutes when I said I would only take five, and now I owe them that time back.

When I gave a detention, instead of just getting mad or trying to weasel out of it, they’d pull out an encyclopedic ‘memory’ of the school handbook, looking for any loophole to justify why the rules didn’t apply to them. There was a lot of tit for tat — trying to find the angle to get them to do what I wanted, while making them feel like I was giving them a special deal. I was flexing my brain every single day, having to think like a lawyer while still teaching these kids and acting like their babysitter. They were still way academically lower than they should be, and their behavior was atrocious on top of it. My colleagues are seeing the exact same thing.

The other issue that has come along is now also having to deal with guidance, administration, special ed, and the families holding water for these kids, playing defense over the kind of shit that was never ever a consideration before they came along. I’ve never gotten so many emails or phone calls asking me to change grades, modify assignments, or take back consequences. This is not what I signed up for. And I do wonder what exactly went on in these kids’ lives before they got to high school that produced this attitude of everything getting to be debatable or flexible for them.

AmbitiousProblem4746

9. “I’m a college professor, so I get these students four years downstream. The specific deficit surprises people. It’s not intelligence, and it’s not even knowledge exactly. It’s stamina: the ability to stay inside a hard problem for 20 unassisted minutes. Every friction point in their entire information environment has been optimized away, and now the deliverable itself can be generated on demand. So the muscle that grows during ‘This is hard, and no one is helping me yet’ never develops.”

“What it looks like concretely: students who can produce a polished essay overnight but can’t summarize it aloud the next morning. The polish is up, the ownership is down. And the fix every teacher I know is converging on is the same: make the live, unassisted moment the thing that counts, because it’s the only thing left that can’t be outsourced.”

RefuseWrong9803

10. “Teacher for German high school here (Gymnasium). For me, it really is not the reading, writing, or math skills. While orthography is horrendous, it’s been that way with young children for a while now. The main issue is the inability to deal with problems. Solving a task with some unknown components. Figuring out a way to a solution. Things like this. I’ve always liked to do projects across multiple lessons where researching parts of the solution was necessary. Nowadays, I’ll put a wiki next to the project tasks from which they are to extract those things they are to research. It helps a lot, but some students are still unable to grasp the idea of ‘I don’t know, so I’ll figure it out’ and just give up.”

lantern2safety

11. “I’m in grad school, working as a TA. I’ll pose questions to the undergrads, and they try to turn the question around, reword it, or just completely misunderstand the question because they haven’t done the reading or paid attention in class. Some of them openly challenge the textbook/disagree with it and call the professor a quack (he is the head of the department and working on his own textbook), and it’s genuinely so disturbing.”

I asked them how they decide who an expert is, and not one of them said because of credentials or a PhD. That may not seem egregious, but they had been dismissing some of the textbook authors’ 50+ year-long niche careers, countless foundational research contributions, and scientific innovations, while in a university-level science course.

They framed everything as left vs. right politically, and while it’s great they’re looking to be politically engaged, this particular area of study has far greater nuance than that framing, and to paint the theory we’re learning and its experts as black-and-white or always up for debate hurts to hear. One of my professors says it’s learned thoughtlessness. Ugh.

heyfriendhowsitgoing

12. “Even in grad school, most students won’t read a single article. Even when lectures are recorded for their benefit (they can even watch them at a higher speed), they will still not watch the lectures. At best, they just want to learn the minimum to get a job. But they rarely even meet those standards. They’re paying $6500 per course, and they barely work at learning.”

prove____it

13. “I work with kids one-on-one, and it’s astonishing to see how bad it is and how addicted to technology kids are. They can sit and watch the most mind-numbing things, but as soon as I ask them to do anything, any small amount of work, it’s a meltdown. A tantrum… Most don’t know how to spell their name or write on the lines.”

bluenervana

14. “Teacher in Cali; most of last year’s class could not read. If they can manage to read, they cannot understand and grasp the content they are reading. They can’t focus. They are all running on constant cycles of vocal stimming phrases they heard on TikTok. They can’t reach a conclusion on their own. And all their words are misspelled. I am afraid of returning in the fall.”

3amdadd

15. “Stimming is short for ‘self-stimulating behavior.’ It’s when you do something for the sensory input, basically. It can either be a soothing thing (like block out a bad feeling by touching something nice instead) or a stimulating thing (like the brain not getting enough sensory input to know where your body is in space, so the person taps on something to ground themself). It used to be a thing you’d only hear about autistic people doing, as autism commonly leads to overstimulation or under stimulation, depending on the individual. An overstimulated person can block out overwhelming sensory input with a more soothing one, and an under stimulated person can stim to get the stimulation needed for the brain to function properly.

Stimming can be basically anything that gives sensory input, and is often done repeatedly. The stereotypical ones for autism tend to be things like rocking and hand flapping. A vocal stim is when the stimulation comes from making a noise, often an imitation of something that has been heard, usually over and over. I’m autistic, and when I was a kid, I’d imitate the same lines and sound effects from TV shows and toys over and over and over. Drove my parents wild.

It’s very concerning that non-autistic individuals are doing it so much. It indicates they’re used to being so constantly overstimulated (likely by high-dopamine screen content) that they can no longer function properly in a normal situation. So they start quoting the thing they like over and over as a socially acceptable way to try to bring back the stimulation they’re craving.”

ShiraCheshire

16. “The TikTok sound stimming is wild. Kids SCREAM in the classroom. Yes, we were loud as kids, but we would never scream. Just constant TikTok sounds on loop while they’re working. ‘We are Charlie Kirrrrkkkk’ ‘FAAAAAHHH’ ‘Oh heeeelll nooooo’ ‘Tung tung tung tung tung tung’ neverending…it’s never ending.”

PeachyPesco

17. “Teacher in Sweden, and it’s pretty freaking bad here too. Parents have failed their kids by not having them read more at a young age; instead, they gave them phones and social media. We, the teachers, can see that the kids that aren’t always on their phones perform, in general, WAY better.”

Mark-reels

18. “The phone thing is wild to see in real time — like, you can almost predict their test scores by how many times they try to sneak a peek during class.”

Slight-Rip-3574

19. “At the end of the school year last year, my first grader brought home a phone number from one of his friends. What does a first grader need a phone for? Is he running a business, wandering around town, or setting his own appointments? They’re probably buried in that thing for 12 hours a day. It’s really bad for adults, and we aren’t in key developmental years.”

TheGringoDingo

20. “Kindergarten teacher in Thailand here. You can tell which kids read and interact with their parents, and those that are babied or neglected. At least here, parents have a tendency to give them screen time for most of their non-school time. They rarely read to their kids and hardly have a conversation. Those kids struggle to retain any form of information. Meanwhile, the kids who grow up reading as a daily routine with their parents at bedtime pick up our phonics program much faster. This year, only two of my 10 students finished kindergarten with a full understanding of our basic phonics program and are able to decode. The rest struggle to pronounce vowels and blend two sounds.”

“It’s clear as night and day. The two kids that do read can also tell me what their parents do for work and where they are from. They ask questions and are generally curious kids. The other eight couldn’t tell me what their parents do, and some of them couldn’t even tell me what country/city they are from. They don’t want to know why fire is hot, they just want to be told it is.”

Nariot

21. “My nephew’s teacher said something similar at parent night, basically told everyone the kids who read at home are miles ahead, and it’s not even subtle.”

Slight-Rip-3574

22. “I had MANY students who averaged a second-grade reading level in my fifth-grade classroom. And this is excluding those with IEPS or identified disabilities.”

MediocreVideo1893

23. “I’m a former daycare teacher; it starts young. Four- to five-year-olds hated story time and hated ‘reading’ even more.”

Queer-deer

24. “I’m a high school English teacher with 14 years of experience teaching 12- to 18-year-olds. The major issues I’ve seen appearing have been:

1) Dramatically reduced attention spans, particularly when watching films or longer reading. E.g., the film Holes is studied, and it’s a slog getting students to pay attention and retain what they watched.

2) Spelling remains consistent; however, grammar and punctuation have gotten worse. Run-on and fragment sentences galore.

3) Having empathy for characters is slower to develop. I would normally see it in 80% of the class by year nine; now it’s year 10 onwards, and the majority of students understand character motivation and empathy at a decent level.

4) A decline in problem-solving, not when applied to complex problems, but general troubleshooting or finding a solution to small issues. It’s almost a base-level learned helplessness.

5) A decline in personal responsibility, e.g., homework completed on time, remembering the correct items. Typically, these issues disappear in Senior years, but still remain.

6) Rise of right-wing extremism in general conversation and discussion. Asking for their evidence beyond ‘Trust me, bro’ works in making them question their beliefs.

It’s not that they can’t read. It’s a much more complex issue. I have also found a lack of basic domestic skills in families. Such as fixing small tears or lost buttons on uniforms, getting stains out of uniforms, cleaning shoes and belongings. In the early 2000s, as an older teen, I was responsible for my school uniform, and I just don’t see that now.”

paperconservation101

25. “Teacher in New Zealand here, and an older Gen Z myself. It’s quite bad. I have kids who can’t pronounce words they should, and many more who can’t/won’t read even a paragraph, let alone comprehend it. Most of my class complains that writing two sentences is ‘too much’ and a shocking number can’t read an analog clock (I teach high school). There’s still some high flyers out there, and the main difference is that their parents limit screen time and encourage reading.”

Perfect_Pessimist

26. “I have to teach kids how to read an analog clock. I work with high schoolers.”

BlackFenrir

27. “Professor here. When I have students read out loud in class, they have trouble with very basic words (latest examples: independence, expectation, agency). When asked to interpret what they’ve read, one student out of 40 can muddle through a cogent response. It’s the worst environment I’ve seen in 30 years.”

SharonWit

28. “I’m an English Teacher at a Sydney public school. I have been teaching since 2018, and I have noticed it’s gone worse, like reading and comprehending short one-page texts is too much for them, so we need to break them down into paragraphs just so it’s easier to comprehend what they are reading. Also, with their writing, we have given students heavily guided scaffolds with sentence starters and examples, but it seems it’s too much for them. I actually get worried about how kids are going to be in the next five years.”

Ban_Hammer40K

29. “Kids don’t read. Kids aren’t bored, so they don’t get creative and do hands-on things. The schools and parents don’t push the kids, so they can’t handle anything. There are no consequences for failing, and thanks to No Child Left Behind, they move on regardless. They have no critical thinking skills and the attention span of a gnat. You can literally tell them the answer, and they can’t write it down. The last five-ish years have been fucking hell; they just don’t have the basic skills to function.”

“There’s a slow shift towards going back to paper and pen; the schools that have done this have shown drastically better results. I do paper assignments, and my kids do better than the kids in classes where it’s tech-driven.”

KittenKingdom000

30. “I’m a professor. My students cannot read a college textbook. I don’t mean interpret and understand. I mean, read. I asked one class what happened because they bombed an exam. A student said he tries to do the reading, but doesn’t get it. I asked if it was concepts, and he said no, the words. I told my class that day I cannot dumb it down further, or we’d use a high school textbook, and I’m not going to do that. They cannot read.”

1nf1n1te

31. “I work with kids; recently, sixth to eighth graders were tasked with creating presentations for an idea that they were to present to a company, and I had several of them ask me how to spell basic words such as ‘people’, ‘area,’ and ‘want’, the latter of which they’d already spelled ‘whant’. The kicker was when one of them asked me how to spell ‘such as’, and was surprised to learn that it was two words. Sixth to eighth graders. Almost high school-aged. And it wasn’t just one or two that may be struggling with dyslexia or other learning disabilities — it was all of them. Scary and sad stuff.”

BigFanOfArtAndNature

32. “Students are using ChatGPT for even the most basic assignments. Even asking them to do something personal and creative gets me AI-generated crap.”

SmitzchtheKitty

33. “There is a small but growing group of students who have basically surrendered anything that even approaches cognition to LLMs. We’re talking, kids asking ChatGPT how they feel about their morning. It is only going to get worse.”

Bargeinthelane

34. “I teach middle school math at a high-performing school. They cannot do basic math. They all assume AI will do it for them, so there is no point in trying. I am routinely asked questions like, ‘What’s eight times zero?’ Or, ‘how many sides does a triangle have?’ These are eighth graders.”

threatlevelm1dnight

35. “My wife is the head of the math department in her high school, and she says the number of kids coming out of elementary school that are basically math illiterate is astounding.”

Mpennerbball

36. “There’s no ‘number sense’ and just panic anytime there are numbers involved. There’s no ‘yeah that’s about right’ and then doing the work to get it exact. I had a student put 1+0 into a calculator this year because they panicked anytime numbers were around. Math has always been an issue, but never like this. There’s no concept of how to approach any type of problem; it’s always a ‘let’s throw everything at the wall and maybe something will stick.’”

atleastonedan

37. “If a math problem requires more than two steps, 80% of the class just completely blanks out.”

neilalex_official

38. “They can’t finish their times tables. Many of them give up. Even after finishing more than half of it. ‘I forgot the rest.’ Some can finish within 10+ minutes. A bit more in five+ minutes. My own PR is like 1m56sec as an adult math teacher. A few kids can do it in two+ minutes. I have a lot of friends from a lot of different backgrounds. Being able to complete the times tables (or even doing multiplication sprint sheets) was something we got actively trained in. I teach 10th grade, and by the time they get to me, a lot of them cannot complete their times tables. It’s wild to me, but I try to teach them the Pythagorean theorem and the quadratic formula anyway (while trying to improve their mental math skills).”

encognitowhetherman

39. “I just quit my teaching job at a middle school this past year (for health-related reasons…mostly). It’s exactly as bad as people are saying it is. Kids can’t read well, and if they can, it’s only short paragraphs. They struggle with basic instructions when they’re written without constant support and repetition. Even in my ‘honors’ classes, the average reading level was at least one or two years behind. Now, I will stress that there were absolutely some phenomenal and very bright students in my classes in recent years. But that number has gone down consistently over the past decade. Curriculum is being dumbed down at a systemic level to push kids through to graduation.”

TheMasterFlash

40. “We are passing kids through because the worst thing possible would be to keep them back, apparently. But they are failing and still graduating, where they are functionally illiterate and can’t do basic math. It needs to start very early on, we need to hold kids back who can’t read or do math on grade level, like second or third grade, and not worry about hurting their feelings or what the parents would think or whatever.”

atleastonedan

41. “No Child Left Behind (NCLB) means that kids who are a year behind in learning development are still pushed onto the next grade. My dad literally isn’t allowed to fail kids – if they refuse to do an assignment, they still get a 55. When they email parents about their kids’ situations, the parents either say it’s the teacher’s fault or that they’re too overworked to deal with it, and it isn’t their problem. And the state requires so much standardized testing that they’re forced to spend much of the year doing test prep and don’t have time to actually tailor the curriculum to the kids’ needs.”

Mossishellagay

42. “Can’t give Fs. I remember telling my principal that I had two students who were failing my class. Verbatim, she responded, ‘Well, better find something they can pass.’”

BdaMann

43. “Director of a program that hosts young school-age children up to third grade in the summer here. Twelve of the 22 children enrolled in the school-age classroom have learning challenges, half of whom have formal IEPs and half of whom have apparent yet not officially represented learning challenges in a learning plan. The handwriting and general early literacy skills of these children are atrocious and frightening. Third graders who cannot reliably spell simple CVC (consonant-vowel-consonant) words or basic, first 100 HF (high frequency) words are shockingly common. Very few of them are able to read basic, beginner chapter books such as Henry and Mudge, Frog and Toad, or Amelia Bedelia, etc. General fine motor skills and problem-solving skills are also lacking in many of them. Some of these children struggle to focus to complete simple board games or learn and retain the rules of games they enjoy, but need a lot of adult support to successfully play.”

“Not to bemoan how things ‘used to be’ but I distinctly remember our final spelling test in first grade included words like ‘elephant’ and ‘giraffe’ and we were expected to recognize and write most foundational high-frequency words (we had parents who came in to help us write little stories of our own in a writer’s workshop-type set-up that got put in the classroom library) and the teacher regularly read books with complex vocabulary (his favorite word was ‘pandemonium’). We were taught to check out and return our own books at the school library, memorize our lunch code and bus number, and color card (#264, Magenta), among so many other things.

The younger generation is not inherently less capable, though. The children in the school-age room love hearing complex chapter books and understand the storyline well. They are imaginative and creative, but often don’t know how to express themselves. They are empathetic and much more inclined to include and not judge other children. Something has changed, and it is holding children back from learning critical capacities to be lifelong learners and to enjoy learning and reveling in pushing their abilities to the next level.”

ApplePieKitty87

44. “For those who don’t know, CVC = consonant-vowel-consonant. ‘The younger generation is not inherently less capable, though.’ I agree with this. I’ve been running TTRPGs for kids as an extracurricular activity for a few years, and while it takes them a bit, a lot of these ‘missing’ skills show up by the end of my program.”

FixinThePlanet

45. “I’m a librarian in California, and I’ve encountered several teens and middle schoolers who struggle to write their last names, addresses, and phone numbers. Yesterday, I spoke with an 11-year-old who forgot how to write her last name, and her mom said, ‘It’s summertime, it’s normal to forget.’ I’m in my 30s, and I don’t remember that being normal?”

Ewstefania

46. “I’m not a teacher personally, but I have a couple in my family: my sister teaches elementary/middle school, and my father teaches high school. It is BAD. As a fun (scary) game, my sister will show me assignments from her students, and I try to guess what age they are. The handwriting and spelling skills that you’d expect from a six-year-old are now how 10-year-olds write. They simply can’t do math. Some of the older elementary schoolers can’t add single-digit numbers. Among the high schoolers, they often just flat out refuse to do assignments. Too many big words? They just say they won’t do it. They sleep and vape in class.”

“It’s the parents’ and the people in charge’s fault. EVERYTHING is done on Chromebooks, so they genuinely never develop writing skills. In the middle schools, on the rare occasion that they have to read a book, they’re given an audiobook option in case actually reading feels like too much work.

The students are, frankly, incredibly lazy, bordering on illiterate, and do not give a flying fuck. But that’s a result of the environment they’re in now.”

Mossishellagay

47. “They’re all over the map. There are kids who read 20 books over the summer and maintain a reading list of the classics a mile long. Kids who finish their math work so fast that you have to find six more things for them to do before class is over. Then there are kids who break down in tantrums over the least little thing. Those who just say ‘no’ when told to do an assignment. Second-graders who wander around the classroom writing ‘fuck’ on every surface. Kids who purposely kick other kids on the playground then gleefully run away. You can’t say no to the kids. You can’t send them to the principal’s office. There are no consequences for any of their actions.”

“You either coddle them, or you lose whatever imaginary control you have over the classroom. Every single classroom is dragged down by the kids with emotional problems that are impossible to solve.”

NoPoet3982

48. “Our school traded the fifth-grade science fair project for ‘career day’ where they all ‘researched’ that they wanted to be YouTubers.”

GratefulHead420

49. “A good portion of my students don’t know how to tie their shoes, and they refuse to learn how.”

See here

50. And finally… “They can’t cope. If something doesn’t go the way they think it should, they have a total meltdown. If they don’t understand a skill immediately, they give up.”

See here

There were more, but you should get the idea… These mentally, emotionally, and spiritually deficient children are our next generation parentsteachersdoctorsscientistslegislatorsleaders, etc.

Does this make you extremely concerned for the future of our country?

If so, don’t just shake your head — take real action that will make a meaningful difference for thousands of children. Fixing this starts with YOU.

©2026 All rights reserved.

Here is other information from this scientist that you might find interesting:

I urge all readers to subscribe to AlterAI — IMO the absolute best AI option for subjective questions.

I will consider posting reader submissions on Critical Thinking about my topics of interest.

My commentaries are my opinion about the material discussed therein, based on the information I have. If any readers have different information, please share it. If it is credible, I will be glad to reconsider my position.

Check out the Archives of this Critical Thinking substack.

C19Science.info is my one-page website that covers the lack of genuine Science behind our COVID-19 policies.

Election-Integrity.info is my one-page website that lists multiple major reports on the election integrity issue.

WiseEnergy.org is my multi-page website that discusses the Science (or lack thereof) behind our energy options.

Media Balance Newsletter: a free, twice-a-month newsletter that covers what the mainstream media does not do, on issues from climate to COVID, elections to education, renewables to religion, etc. Here are the Newsletter’s 2026 Archives. Please send me an email to get your free copy. When emailing me, please make sure to include your full name and the state where you live. (Of course, you can cancel the Media Balance Newsletter at any time!)

University of Michigan Dumbed Down America—Now It’s Abolishing Grades

By The Geller Report

The University of Michigan’s largest undergraduate unit, the College of Literature, Science, and the Arts (LSA), announced a pilot program starting in fall 2027 where incoming freshmen will receive “Pass” or “No Credit” on external transcripts for their first semester instead of letter grades.

Freshmen get ‘pass’ or ‘no credit’—no real grades required. In other words, they are producing Democrats.

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN JUST WENT FULL PARTICIPATION TROPHY

Incoming students will no longer get real grades.

Just “Pass” or “No Credit.”

All in the name of “mental health.”

No more A’s. No more F’s. No distinction between the kid who worked his ass off and the one who barely showed up.

They’re turning a competitive university into expensive daycare.

In a world where kids from other countries are grinding for every point, Michigan just decided effort doesn’t matter.

Soft school. Soft standards. Soft future.

This is how you raise a generation that can’t handle reality.

University of Michigan to nix letter grades for many first-semester students

By Max Rego, The Hill, August 6, 2026:

The University of Michigan’s College of Literature, Science and Arts (LSA) will get rid of final letter grades for first-semester students starting in fall 2027.

The college unveiled the change on its website, saying it will designate all first-year LSA students with pass or no credit on their first-semester transcripts. Those students will still receive letter grades and feedback from instructors, the announcement noted.

The change is intended to help first-term students “establish early momentum” and “curb the mental health crisis unfolding” among college students.

“Our goal is to help first-year students acclimate to the demands of college and allow intrinsic motivations to guide personally meaningful academic journeys—core elements of a liberal arts and sciences education,” the announcement stated. “For example, they can explore a subject that may not come easily to them or take a course in a new field without the fear that a low grade may have long-term consequences.”

Eighteen percent of college students reported severe depression symptoms in the 2024-25 Healthy Minds Study — which is administered by the Healthy Minds Network at Michigan’s flagship university — marking the third straight year of decline.

Justin Heinze, an associate professor at the university’s School of Public Health, noted the reductions are “not a blip.”

Heinze said, “Whether it’s distance from the pandemic, better institutional support, or something else driving the change, I think this is a promising counternarrative to what seems like constant headlines around young people’s struggles with mental health.”

All first-year LSA students will be enrolled in the program, with the college noting an “opt-in” program would “defeat the purpose of facilitating students’ transition to campus,” supporting their mental health and motivating them to learn.

“If covered grades are optional, covering an individual’s grades will inadvertently become equated with them not doing well in a class,” the announcement added.

New transfer students will not be eligible for the program, while the university will maintain final grades internally for athletic eligibility, compliance reporting and students’ eligibility for financial aid, among other purposes.

The LSA college is the largest at Michigan, with 19,733 undergraduates and 3,521 first-year students enrolled as of the fall of 2025. As of last fall, roughly 35,300 undergraduates were enrolled at the university, which the U.S. News & World Report ranks as the third-best public institution in the country.

Michigan is not alone in eliminating letter grades for first-semester students. Since 1968, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology has assigned pass or no credit grades during first-year fall and letter grades in the spring.

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

POST ON X:

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Major Teachers Union Backs Democrats’ Neo-Confederate Resistance to Immigration Enforcement

By The Daily Signal

Democrats across the country are opposing President Donald Trump’s enforcement of immigration law, arguably recreating the nullification crisis that helped spark the Civil War—and this neo-Confederate trend just received a major boost from an influential union.

The American Federation of Teachers, a union that bankrolls Democrat candidates and left-leaning causes, approved a resolution opposing Immigration and Customs Enforcement at its annual convention in July, and that radical resolution encourages further opposition to immigration law, pitting state and local authorities against the federal government.

Minnesota Democrat Gov. Tim Walz has threatened to deploy his state’s National Guard troops against federal agents. Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., claimed federal immigration enforcement was an “occupying force.” Virginia Democrat Gov. Abigail Spanberger signed laws attempting to dictate how federal agents enforce the law in the Old Dominion.

Governors like JB Pritzker of Illinois, or Gavin Newsom of California, or Tina Kotek of Oregon, openly say that immigration law should not be enforced in their jurisdictions. Many states and cities have directed state and local law enforcement not to cooperate with ICE when it comes to removing illegal aliens.

These arguments echo the doctrine of nullification, the theory that states can refuse to cooperate with—or even actively obstruct—the enforcement of federal law. South Carolina advanced this theory in the Nullification Crisis of 1832, and it formed part of the bedrock for the South’s secession movements leading up to the Civil War. Today’s “sanctuary” movement differs in many respects, but it also aims to frustrate federal enforcement by mobilizing state and local power against national policy.

The AFT’s Institutional Support for Neo-Confederate Opposition

The union adopted a resolution on July 18 stating that it supports “efforts by governors, attorneys general, mayors, and other state and local leaders across the nation to protect residents from ICE.”

The resolution also pledges to call on elected leaders to “use every tool in their toolbox” to: ban ICE from sensitive locations, ban ICE from conducting immigration enforcement without a judicial warrant, prevent local and state law enforcement coordination with ICE, and provide resources and training for “state employees” to “properly defend against and respond to unlawful actions from ICE agents.”

In a particularly brazen suggestion, the resolution calls on officials to “safeguard public school districts against enrollment declines… through state intervention and financial assistance.”

While the union suggests that ICE is breaking the law, immigration enforcement is a civil matter, not a criminal one, so ICE agents do not need to acquire judicial warrants to carry out raids—administrative warrants are sufficient.

The resolution aligns America’s second-largest teachers union with a campaign to obstruct federal immigration enforcement.

Why AFT Matters

Americans can disagree on immigration policy, but many of us wonder why a teachers union is devoting convention time to opposing federal immigration enforcement rather than addressing reading scores, absenteeism, classroom discipline, or teacher recruitment.

The American Federation of Teachers has long supported Democrats and leftist causes. Many prominent Democrats, including House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, addressed its annual convention in July.

The union’s political action arm has contributed to a wide swath of Democrat candidates in races across the country, according to public records analyzed by the parental rights group Defending Education. It contributed $500,000 to Democrat Abigail Spanberger’s 2025 gubernatorial campaign in Virginia, for example.

The American Federation of Teachers “functions as nothing more than a money-laundering operation for the Democrat Party,” Corey DeAngelis, a research fellow for education policy at the Heritage Foundation, told the Daily Signal. “Year after year, 99% of the contributions from Randi Weingarten’s union go to Democrats. She herself held an at-large position at the DNC for decades.”

“The AFT isn’t a labor organization focused on classrooms,” he added. “It’s an arm of the Democratic Party that uses teachers’ dues to advance partisan priorities, fund activist groups, and push policies that have nothing to do with improving education. This ICE resolution is just the latest example.”

Lora Ries, director of Heritage’s border security and immigration center, noted that “the Left has a long list of ‘sensitive areas’ where they claim ICE shouldn’t operate in or near, which would render ICE unable to do its job—and that is the point.”

The union gives Democrats support for the neo-Confederate opposition to Trump’s enforcement of immigration law. So long as influential leftist groups like the American Federation of Teachers encourage this divisive lawlessness, the tension will only get worse.

AUTHOR

Tyler O’Neil 

Tyler O’Neil is senior investigative reporter at the Daily Signal and the author of two books, “Making Hate Pay: The Corruption of the Southern Poverty Law Center” and “The Woketopus: The Dark Money Cabal Manipulating the Federal Government.” Follow on X Tyler2ONeil.

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Signal column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Connecticut: New law requires educators to develop curriculum materials for Islamic, Arab studies

By Jihad Watch

Holocaust and genocide studies are certainly not the same as advancing Islamic and Arab studies materials. Does the law include curriculum materials for Judaism studies?

Let’s hope this ridiculous law is challenged legally. Already it’s drawing such concern:

Chris Healy, executive director of the Connecticut Catholic Conference, concurred. The Courant cited him as saying that the Islamic curriculum “validates, endorses the teaching of public religion in a public school, which is a clear violation of the First Amendment.”

“This is so clearly unconstitutional,” he said. “These issues were brought respectfully to the legislators, and yet they decided to go forward.…

It’s a DEI curriculum that’s intended to be force-drilled into the minds of youngsters. The curriculum is a win for Islam and its Sharia encroachments across the West. It’s no surprise that “several Muslim leaders and Democratic politicians mostly welcomed the move.”

Given the expansionary nature of Islam, what could possibly go wrong? Especially when an unindicted coconspirator in jihad terror funding case, CAIR, is there to “make sure” the curriculum is implemented to its own satisfaction.

Farhan Memon, CAIR-CT chairman, stated: “We want to make sure that as the state fulfills its mandate to create this curriculum, that it’s done with a view that’s not only accurate, but also ensures that we’re not introducing new biases into the curriculum at the same time..”

CAIR was declared a terrorist organization in Florida and Texas.

“New Connecticut law requires educators to develop curriculum materials for Islamic, Arab studies,” Jerusalem Post, July 29, 2026:

The Hartford skyline comes to light reflected in the Connecticut River and seen from Great River Park in East Hartford, Connecticut, on November 11, 2024.
(photo credit: Mark Mirko/Connecticut Public via Getty Images)

Educators in Connecticut must develop curriculum materials for Islamic and Arab studies according to a new state law that went into effect earlier this month.

The new law, which appears as a small provision in a larger bill, requires the State Board of Education (SBE) to make curriculum materials available to school boards on Islamic and Arab studies and encourage them to provide this instruction.

The law already requires SBE to make curriculum materials available for various other programs, such as African-American and Black studies, Puerto Rican and Latino studies, Native American studies, and Asian American and Pacific Islander studies, and the Holocaust and genocide awareness.

After the state develops the materials to teach Islamic and Arab studies, it will be optional for districts to include the studies in their own curricula.

Several Muslim leaders and Democratic politicians mostly welcomed the move.…

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Mamdani Continues to Marginalize Jews in New York City’s Legal Life

Utah Muslims reach out to CAIR for new chapter: ‘Definitely a need’ for Muslim advocacy

Texas church to be transformed into Islamic complex to spread Islam

Al Jazeera Celebrates Bravery of Communist Islamic Terrorist Who Killed 16 American Christian Pilgrims

RELATED VIDEO:  This Is What Islam Teachs Its Children!

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Why Is Virginia’s Largest Public School District Spending so Much on Lawyers?

By The Daily Signal

In just seven years, Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS) has spent nearly $60 million on lawyers.

During fiscal year 2026 alone, the district set a new record, spending $14.4 million on legal fees.

Fiscal Year Legal Fees
2020 $6,401,078
2021 $5,066,049
2022 $6,312,989
2023 $6,925,475
2024 $11,619,332
2025 $7,656,968
2026 $14,440,784
Total $58,422,675

Source: Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Requests and FCPS Transparency

For a school system that routinely cites budget constraints when discussing teacher pay, classroom resources, and student services, these legal expenditures deserve far more public scrutiny than they have received.

The most striking figure is the nearly $8.9 million paid to King & Spalding during fiscal year 2026. That single firm’s bill exceeded FCPS’s total annual legal spending in every fiscal year before fiscal year 2024.

King & Spalding is representing FCPS in litigation brought by a teacher whistleblower who alleges that school officials participated in funding and facilitating student abortions without parental or guardian knowledge or consent. Although King & Spalding—the law firm that was both the district’s external “independent” investigator and its defense—has suggested that FCPS is innocent in all matters, the whistleblower continues to pursue charges for retaliation against a whistleblower.

FCPS is also spending heavily to defend itself in litigation involving some of the district’s most controversial policies, including those concerning gender identity, student pronouns, access to sex-specific facilities and sports, and lack of parental notification regarding students’ gender transitions.

FCPS Legal Fees by Law Firm, Fiscal Year 2026

Law Firm Amount
King & Spalding $8,933,304
Hunton Andrews Kurth $1,665,330
Blankingship & Keith $1,163,304
Willkie Farr & Gallagher $906,246
McGuireWoods $660,144
Gentry Locke Rakes & Moore $464,112
Michael E. Kinney PLC $336,418
Isler Dare $180,275
Woods Rogers Vandeventer Black $88,004
Law Offices of Polly Chong Inc. $39,964
Sands Anderson $3,682
Total $14,440,784

Source: FCPS Transparency

The legal spending extends well beyond courtroom defense. The district has repeatedly hired outside law firms to conduct what it characterizes as “independent” investigations into its own actions.

Following allegations that an illegal immigrant sexually assaulted 13 female students at Fairfax High School, FCPS retained McGuireWoods to investigate the administration’s response, reportedly paying attorneys up to $1,850 per hour.

The outcome surprised few.

Last month, Superintendent Michelle Reid announced that “the external investigation confirmed that our administration acted promptly and appropriately to stop this behavior.”

Then the district refused to release even a redacted copy of the report to parents or the public, citing attorney-client privilege.

That sequence raises an obvious question: How “independent” is an investigation when the client selects the investigators, pays millions of dollars for their work, and then withholds the report from public view?

Public schools exist to educate children—not to build legal war chests. Yet the district’s legal spending has become so large that it now rivals the budgets of many entire school divisions in Virginia.

Taxpayers have every right to ask why a school district is spending nearly $60 million on lawyers in seven years. Parents have every right to ask why outside counsel is receiving millions while classrooms continue to compete for limited resources. And citizens should expect greater transparency when public dollars are used to defend controversial policies, commission “independent” investigations, and fight litigation against the very community the district is supposed to serve.

Nearly $60 million in legal fees is not merely an accounting statistic. It is a reflection of institutional priorities. The question is whether those priorities still align with the educational mission that taxpayers expect FCPS to fulfill.

We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of the Daily Signal.

AUTHOR

Stephanie Lundquist-Arora

Stephanie Lundquist-Arora is a contributor for The Federalist and the Washington Examiner; a mother in Fairfax County, Va.; an author; and the Fairfax chapter leader of the Independent Women’s Network. Her articles have also appeared in National Review, The Washington Times, and Townhall.

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Signal column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Trump Defunds the Left’s Graphic Sex Ed in Favor of Lessons on Marriage, Family

By Family Research Council

Americans have been so busy fighting against radical gender ideology and critical race theory in schools that one of the Left’s favorite ways to undermine parents has fallen under the radar. But the Trump administration hasn’t lost sight of graphic sex education, and parents everywhere should be grateful for it. In a very underreported move, the president’s team went on the offensive this summer, zeroing out millions of taxpayer dollars for controversial “Teen Pregnancy Prevention” programs in favor of solid curriculum that emphasizes abstinence and marriage.

The New York Times picked up on the cuts weeks after the fact in a sob story lamenting how caught off guard local nonprofits had been by HHS’s announcement. But frankly, no one should be surprised. The Trump administration slashed dozens of grants like this in its first term, arguing — rightly — that they only existed to sexualize children, not equip them to make positive and healthy choices. A whopping 53 programs ended up on the chopping block, saving Americans $67 million in what the president’s budget called “radical leftist ideology.” If anything, the administration argued, the Biden- and Obama-era sex ed models have only “normalize[ed] sexual activity for minors.”

Thanks to liberal ideologues masquerading as health experts, activists like Planned Parenthood have had unlimited access to America’s classrooms, knowing if they hook kids on sex, they’re grooming the next generation of abortion customers. It’s been a great down payment on future business — until now. The Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health (OASH) made it clear that the department is under new management where all of this is concerned, posting a list of priorities that should relieve every sane parent in America.

First of all, the agency vows to ensure that adolescent program materials are “age-appropriate” and “do not promote harmful ideologies, such as gender ideology and discriminatory equity ideology. OASH will focus on programs that do not promote material that depicts, describes, exposes or presents obscene, indecent, or sexually explicit content,” the document notes, “including content that encourages, normalizes or promotes sexual activity for minors. OASH will prioritize OASH programs and funding that are in compliance with these priorities and applicable law.”

Second, OASH promises to defend parental rights “to the fullest extent of its authority under the law … including parents’ right to protect their children from exposure to content that burdens the exercise of their religious beliefs.”

Under this new criteria, NYT complains, anyone applying for taxpayer dollars “must teach abstinence,” also known as sexual risk avoidance, “as the only means to prevent teen pregnancy. Courses must stress the importance of marriage and procreation and instruct young people how to safeguard their fertility. They make scant reference to preventing sexually transmitted infections and virtually none to lesbian, gay and transgender sexuality.”

As FRC’s Quena González pointed out to The Washington Stand, “The fact that some professional sex ed providers who receive millions of dollars in federal funds are complaining that these priorities are now required to continue receiving taxpayer dollars should alarm parents and enrage taxpayers. We shouldn’t be allowing, much less paying for, schools to tell students, ‘We know you’re going to experiment, wink wink, so here’s how to derive the most sexual pleasure from underage sex.’”

González applauded the overhaul as an overdue change to the dangerous status quo. “Insisting that taxpayers pay adults to teach middle schoolers — typically 11-14 years old — about ‘sexual consent,’ pleasurable condom use, or how adolescent girls can use intrauterine devices and implants to avoid pregnancy, is just plain creepy,” he said. “Kids need to be taught that sex is a wonderful gift and a powerful expression of adult love when it is exercised within the safety of a loving marriage covenant. Sex isn’t a toy, and the harms of offering it to minors are well documented and not really debated; studies show that delaying sexual contact until marriage increases the chances of a stable marriage and decreases the chance of living in poverty.”

Valerie Huber, who’s spent decades fighting for this kind of principled approach to sex ed, had one reaction to the administration’s pivot: relief. “Mostly for the young people,” the president of The Institute for Women’s Health told TWS. “For years, sexual risk avoidance had to justify itself while the alternative was funded as though its results were settled. That was never a research question. It was a worldview question dressed up as one.” Now, thanks to Trump, “risk avoidance is being treated as a legitimate public health goal for adolescents, the way it already is for every other youth risk behavior. We do not teach teenagers to smoke carefully. We tell them the truth about risk, and we help them stay at no risk or move from high risk to low risk to no risk,” she emphasized. “Sexual health is the one place we abandoned that model, but now HHS is being consistent across all youth risk behaviors. Bravo!”

Huber looked back over the last several years, lamenting the damage that the Left’s “if-it-feels-good-do-it” message has done. “When adults in authority signal that sexual activity is expected of a 14-year-old, that is not neutral information,” she insisted. “It is permission, and for many students it is pressure.” Under Obama and Biden, she noted, “These programs routinely positioned outside providers, including organizations whose business model depends on abortion, as the trusted adult in a young person’s life — and treated parents as an obstacle to be managed. A curriculum that teaches a 15-year-old how to obtain services without telling her mother is not a health program,” Valerie argued.

With the exception of Trump’s first term, “Students have been offered risk reduction at best and rarely offered risk avoidance,” Huber stressed, “which is the only approach that eliminates risk rather than managing it.”

Although teen pregnancies have dropped over time, she acknowledges, it was a hollow victory. “We counted births. We counted birth control. We did not count infections, we did not count coercion, and we did not measure what happens when pregnancy prevention becomes a substitute for holistic health and thriving for young people,” Valerie said. “We called it a win. In those same years, the emotional, social, intellectual, and spiritual health of American adolescents all declined. If your scorecard shows success while the young people on it are falling apart, you are measuring the wrong thing.”

Of course, the nonprofits who’ve been suddenly cut off from this federal gravy train are complaining that this creates an “existential dilemma” for sex ed. Some, the Times reports, are even suing HHS over the new requirements. But the reality is, there’s no “right” to taxpayer dollars — especially not for an indoctrination scheme that’s only exacerbating the problems they claim to solve.

What’s more, America needs to stop believing that young people can only meet the low bars we set. “Hand a young person a high standard and tell them you believe they can meet it, and most of them rise to it,” Huber underscored. “What they resent instantly is the adult who tells them they cannot be expected to control themselves. They hear that for exactly what it is, which is a low opinion of them.” The Left’s model assumes “every teenager is sexually active,” she shook her head. “Most high school students are not. … No one argues that because some teenagers will use drugs, prevention is unrealistic and we should teach safer use instead. We hold the optimal health standard, and we surround it with skills, support, and honesty about risk.”

To those who say the approach isn’t proven, Dr. Michelle Cretella strongly disagrees. “A rigorous review by the Institute for Research demonstrates that sexual risk avoidance education (SRAE) holds great promise. It aligns with the primary public health principle acknowledged by the CDC: abstinence is the only 100% effective way to prevent STDs and pregnancy, as condoms cannot guarantee absolute protection.” Unlike the Planned Parenthood-style programs, “effective SRAE is medically accurate,” she told TWS, citing an article she just authored for an online medical journal. It “discusses condoms and contraceptives and helps students commit to abstinence without decreasing contraceptive use among those who are already sexually active.”

At the end of the day, our schools were never meant to be a substitute for moms and dads, who have the ultimate responsibility to raise their children in a way that reflects their values. It’s not the job of teachers or outside “experts” to contradict those beliefs or commandeer a parent’s authority on topics that, in all honesty, don’t belong in classrooms in the first place. Now, instead of shipping off tens of millions of dollars to graphic programs that double as LGBT recruiting programs and abortion infomercials, the president is letting research, parents, and common sense dictate how America approaches sex ed. And we should all be thankful for it!

AUTHOR

Suzanne Bowdey

Suzanne Bowdey serves as editorial director and senior writer at The Washington Stand.

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2026 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

DEI Entrenchment: 7 Colleges Suggesting That ‘White Supremacy’ Persists in America

By The Daily Signal

FIRST ON THE DAILY SIGNAL—A new report exposes seven colleges and universities for featuring statements about “white supremacy” that, the report’s authors say, provide the intellectual framework for racial discrimination in admissions, even after a recent Supreme Court ruling invalidated racial quotas.

“Everything on the campuses is framed through a racial lens,” Bill Jacobson, a professor at Cornell Law School and founder of the Legal Insurrection Foundation, told the Daily Signal in an interview Wednesday.

Jacobson founded a website dedicated to exposing critical race theory. CriticalRace.org compiled the list of colleges featuring “white supremacy” statements and exclusively provided it first to the Daily Signal. Jacobson warned that, even though academia is moving away from DEI—short for diversity, equity, and inclusion—many academics remain dedicated to the principles of critical race theory, which his group describes as “a radical ideology that focuses on race as the key to understanding society, and objectifies people based on race.”

“You can close the DEI department, it’s probably going to be called something else,” he said. “At Cornell, DEI is now called ‘Inclusion and Belonging.’” He said the struggle against DEI is a “cultural war as to whether almost the entirety of our education system will be devoted to delegitimizing the United States.”

“Show me a law in the United States that privileges whites over non-whites,” he said. “Bring me a program which, in its eligibility requirements, says only whites can apply. They simply don’t exist.”

He accused critical race theory proponents of treating the country “like it’s still 1956.”

Kemberlee Kaye, managing editor of CriticalRace.org, said that attempting to root out DEI is “almost like a whack-a-mole situation.”

“These institutions have been so deeply captured that it’s not a matter of simply cutting funding to one office and that solves the problem,” she told the Daily Signal. She said colleges and universities are “rebranding things.”

She noted that the Supreme Court struck down race-based admissions in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard (2023), and President Donald Trump issued executive orders cracking down on DEI.

“They are deliberately doing this to avoid the DEI executive orders,” Jacobson said.

Below is the list of colleges and universities using “white supremacy” rhetoric featured in the CriticalRace.org report. The Daily Signal reached out to each institution for comment but did not hear back.

1. San Diego State University

San Diego State University’s webpage for “diversity” at the College of Arts and Letters states that the college houses many departments that “help provide students with culturally relevant curricula, critical thinking skills, and accurate knowledge to critique white supremacy and promote social justice.”

2. Boston University

Boston University’s School of Social Work: Center for Aging & Disability Education & Research offers a three-step course on “Understanding Structural & Institutional Racism.” The course examines “racial capitalism, white supremacy, and structural and institutional racism” and the influence of “white supremacist ideology” on American society.

3. Loyola University Maryland

Loyola University Maryland’s philosophy department released a “statement of solidarity with BIPOC Community at Loyola and Beyond” in 2020, and the page remained on the philosophy department’s website until this year. The statement pledged to “integrate a diversity of texts and viewpoints into our courses that address the moral problems of discrimination and inequality at all levels.”

The statement pledged not to “‘whitewash’ the history of white supremacy in the philosophical canon.” The department claimed that “the history of the United States is the history of terrorizing and snuffing out Black life through police killings and white supremacist vigilantism.”

4. San Francisco State University

San Francisco State University’s webpage on “Diversity and Inclusion” mentions the “Justice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Pedagogies for Inclusive Excellence Institute,” which “builds a community of JEDI protagonists by developing anti-racist pedagogy and dismantling white supremacy in online teaching.”

5. University of Tennessee, Knoxville

The University of Tennessee, Knoxville’s Center for Children’s and Young Adult Literature published a webpage titled “Fighting Anti-Black Racism through Story.” This page claims that “the ongoing police brutality against Black men, women, and youth is not a new phenomenon, but instead is a current manifestation of long-histories, state-sanctioned racism, anti-Blackness, and white supremacy in this country.”

6. Portland State University

Portland State University’s Multicultural Retention Services department released a statement “in solidarity & action for Black Lives Matter.” The statement claims that “Multicultural Retention Services stands in solidarity with the Black community as an extension of the work we do to combat white supremacy, racism, and anti-blackness.”

Multicultural Retention Services claims that specific acts of police brutality “have been a product of white supremacy in this country.”

7. Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts

The Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts’ Wellness Strategic Plan includes an “Anti-Discrimination and Anti-Racist Statement.” The program claims that counseling professionals “recognize the importance of taking a stand and offering support by naming and addressing what causes the illness, wounds, and impairment, i.e. systemic racism and white supremacy.”

A Hostile Environment

The report also notes that some leftist groups have used the term “white supremacy” to describe conservative political figures—including conservatives on college campuses.

It notes that the Southern Poverty Law Center, a group that gained its reputation by suing Ku Klux Klan organizations into bankruptcy, accused the conservative campus organization Turning Point USA of seeking “to enforce a social order rooted in white supremacy.”

Jacobson told the Daily Signal that, while no evidence shows that the man accused of murdering Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk had been directly influenced by the SPLC, the SPLC’s attack “contributed to the atmosphere” around Kirk’s assassination in September 2025.

“Those sort of accusations are made at Cornell,” he said. “I think the SPLC undoubtedly contributes to the silencing of conservative voices.”

Kaye noted that the SPLC currently faces wire fraud and bank fraud charges for allegedly directing donor funds to the very hate groups the SPLC claims it exists to oppose.

“If we’re looking at white supremacy, the only absolute verifiable examples we have of that in modern times would be the vestiges of the KKK, which we now know are bankrolled by the SPLC,” she quipped.

AUTHOR

Tyler O’Neil 

Tyler O’Neil is senior investigative reporter at the Daily Signal and the author of two books, “Making Hate Pay: The Corruption of the Southern Poverty Law Center” and “The Woketopus: The Dark Money Cabal Manipulating the Federal Government.” Follow on X Tyler2ONeil.

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Signal column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

NYC’s Public School Nightmare: Nearly Half of NYC Students Can’t Read or Pass Math, Democrats Covering It Up – Graduating Illiteracy

By The Geller Report

Nearly Half of NYC Public Schools Are Failing Our Children While Mamdani Wages His Ideological Jihad

Students can’t read or do math, but they’re programmed to vote socialist.

Fewer than half the students at nearly 900 New York City public schools are proficient in math and reading, according to a stunning new report. Even more alarming, 43% of the city’s roughly 912,000 public school students are trapped in these chronically failing schools. New York’s schools are destroying our children’s futures.

While Zohran Mamdani fixates on imposes sharia, demonizes Jews, and drives businesses and producers out of New York, an entire generation of children is being condemned to abject failure. This is the real horror. New York’s public schools are collapsing, and the city’s left-wing political class is too busy pursuing radical agendas to save its own kids. It’s not even a line item.

Randi Weingarten, corrupt President of the American Federation of Teachers, should be brought up on charges.

As one commenter opined, ‘As long as the radical LEFT and the corrupt teacher unions control the public education system expect these statistics to get worse. It’s amazing how the parents of these kids keep voting against their own self interest’

By Carl Campanile, NY Post

Failure in the city’s public education system has become “normalized” — and even bolstered by grade inflation and fixing — with nearly half of schools consistently failing their students, a bombshell new report found.

The sweeping analysis, conducted by the Success Academy Charter Schools network, found that in those 906 public schools, fewer than half of students passed math, reading, or both, on state exams last year.

In total, a staggering 43% of the system’s approximately 912,000 students are in these failing schools, according to the shocking report released Tuesday.

Of the 906 schools, a majority of students in 503 of them failed both math and reading.

Popular California TV anchor reveals simple trick scammers used to fleece her of $72K: ‘I feel dumb’

About a third of the 906 schools have appeared on state “accountability” lists since 2012, and some have been designated as failures for decades, the analysis found.

Instead of attacking the 5-alarm fire, the stinging indictment claims city and state policies have only worsened the situation by failing to address the scandal or trying to hide it.

“These are not accidents. They are the product of a system that has chosen, year after year, to protect itself rather than serve its students,” the report, titled, “By Any Honest Measure,” said.

“Imagine a hospital where more than half of patients died from routine procedures. A fire department that failed to respond to more than half its calls. A municipal water utility that delivered contaminated water to more than half its residents, or air traffic controllers whose lack of oversight regularly resulted in massive casualties.

“No other public institution would be permitted to operate in this way.”

But the level of failure in the nation’s largest public school system “has been normalized — and, worse, systematically obscured.”

Follow live updates on Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s socialist agenda and the latest in NYC politics

Success Academy head, Eva Moskowitz, said the report marked the most extensive review to date of consistently low-performing schools.

The report also accused New York policy makers and educators of actually rewarding failure — including by pumping more funds into low-performing schools with dwindling enrollment.

New York City spent $40 billion on public education in 2024 — $36,293 per pupil, double the national average of $17,619.

Lawmakers pump more money into the failing schools, to more than $40,000 per student, the report found.

According to the analysis, 34% of elementary students attend failing schools, with that percentage going up to 49% for middle schoolers and 62% for high schoolers, based on test scores.

In many cases, students are routed from a failing elementary school to a failing middle school to a failing high school.

Many high school graduates are unprepared for college-level work and have to take remedial courses when enrolled in CUNY’s community colleges, the report noted.

The problem would be worse if not for grade inflation — and the accountability system for both students and teachers is a joke, the analysis charged.

The student grading policy measures effort, participation, and attendance — but excludes performance on the state’s standardized math and English exams.

Using state test scores as part of a student’s grade was scrapped by the Panel for Educational Policy under then-Mayor Bill de Blasio.

It means nearly all students who score poorly on state exams end up getting good grades and are promoted.

Meanwhile, state policy forbids using student test scores to evaluate teachers. Therefore, nearly all teachers receive satisfactory ratings.

The report noted: “98% of teachers [rated] effective. 43% of students failing. The math doesn’t add up.”

The state Education Department also comes under severe criticism — for repeatedly lowering benchmarks to boost passing rates on its math and reading exams, the report said.

The manipulation is exposed when students score much lower on the federal government’s National Assessment of Educational Progress exams, considered the gold standard for testing.

Albany has participated in downplaying or covering up failure, the report charges.

The state no longer releases its own comparisons on standardized test results by traditional public versus charter schools, as the latter on the whole perform better on the exams.

But state lawmakers are also blocking entry into alternative education programs, such as higher-performing charters, by imposing a cap on the number allowed to open.

A decade ago, the state Legislature also approved a law striking the phrase “persistently failing school,” changing the term to “persistently struggling.”

The legislation — passed at the behest of the powerful United Federation Teachers president Michael Mulgrew — comes despite enrollment in city public schools dipping by 123,000 students since 2020, the report said.

The city Department of Education failed to consolidate or close schools after a decade of enrollment decline, the report said.

The struggling and failing schools already have lower class sizes because families abandoned them, and the report said evidence doesn’t support the mandate setting classroom caps. Of the roughly 900 failing schools cited in the report, 167 were woefully under-enrolled.

Another budget drain is the city Department of Education’s commitment to “propping up schools” with plummeting enrollment.

Read more.

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Critically Thinking about K-12 Expenditures vs Performance

By John Droz, Jr.

Let’s keep things in perspective… 

The teacher’s unions, and other self-serving allies, are always claiming that teacher pay is too low — and fixing that will solve the education crisis in our K-12 system (e.g., see here and here).

However, like a LOT of things we hear these days, this is inaccurate. Such assertions are made as the lobbyists know that the vast majority of citizens are NOT critical thinkers, so few will recognize when they are being conned.

See here for an example of reality. It shows that in the State of Washington, K-12 expenditure over the 2013 → 2024 period went off the charts.

Some will immediately attribute this to inflation, but this is also plotted, and the expenditures were 300%± what inflation was.

Worse, over the same period, the student performance in two sample K-12 subjects dropped precipitously.

Every other State is also listed on the Edunomics Lab. (Search over “ROI”.)

The clear message here (and the data indicate that it is true in almost every other State), is that spending more money did NOT produce better performance.

In fact, the evidence shows that there is a negative correlation: more K-12 expenditures produce WORSE K-12 student performance…

The clear takeaway is that we need to reform what is being taught in K-12, not pay more for more of the same.

In simple terms: our K-12 school system should NOT be teaching children what to think (as is happening now), but rather HOW TO THINK!

It is as simple as that…

©2026 All rights reserved.


Here is other information from this scientist that you might find interesting:

I urge all readers to subscribe to AlterAI — IMO the absolute best AI option for subjective questions.

I will consider posting reader submissions on Critical Thinking about my topics of interest.

My commentaries are my opinion about the material discussed therein, based on the information I have. If any readers have different information, please share it. If it is credible, I will be glad to reconsider my position.

Check out the Archives of this Critical Thinking substack.

C19Science.info is my one-page website that covers the lack of genuine Science behind our COVID-19 policies.

Election-Integrity.info is my one-page website that lists multiple major reports on the election integrity issue.

WiseEnergy.org is my multi-page website that discusses the Science (or lack thereof) behind our energy options.

Media Balance Newsletter: a free, twice-a-month newsletter that covers what the mainstream media does not do, on issues from climate to COVID, elections to education, renewables to religion, etc. Here are the Newsletter’s 2026 Archives. Please send me an email to get your free copy. When emailing me, please make sure to include your full name and the state where you live. (Of course, you can cancel the Media Balance Newsletter at any time!)

Restoring the American Dream from Myth to Reality

By Family Research Council

For generations, an ordinary and flourishing American life was beautifully simple — work hard, buy a home, raise a family, and retire comfortably. It wasn’t a utopian fantasy, it wasn’t just some dream, it was a reliable and easily calculated reality.

Today that feels like a distant and outdated relic.

For the modern-day family, the markers that once defined a stable, self-reliant adulthood have been priced far out of reach. We are witnessing a breakdown of the traditional dynamic of reward for hard work. The math no longer adds up for the working class.

The Decline

The American Dream’s erosion can be tracked through several abysmal economic shifts over the last couple decades. The trajectory of the housing market is evident of this: in the 1960s, the average cost of a home was about twice the average annual salary. Today, that stability is gone, with the average home costing nearly six times the average income. What once was a normal milestone for the average worker to achieve in their 20s is now a debt trap that levies decades of financial strain.

Higher education has adopted an even more predatory direction. Tuition, which at one point consisted of a mere couple hundred dollars, allowed students to work a summer job and independently work their way through school. Today, that same degree will cost a student tens of thousands of dollars, ensnaring young Americans in excessive debt before they make their first paycheck.

The most devastating consequence, however, is felt inside the home. A singular income traditionally had supported a family. Now, it commonly takes two full-time jobs just to scrape by. The once-normal traditional family structure has been severely strained as parents are forced out of necessity to spend more time working to outpace inflation than raising their own children.

The events that have led us here are in no way accidental. They are the direct result of a series of catastrophic policy shifts. From Richard Nixon’s fateful 1971 decision to suspend the conversion of the dollar into gold, launching runaway inflation, to George W. Bush’s decision to admit during the 2008 financial crisis that “the market is not functioning properly,” government intervention has distorted the natural economy.

Restoring the Dream

If we want to preserve the foundation of our nation, the crisis must be understood in the context of the structural problem that it is. A reality in which American families can flourish requires four essential policy shifts:

The first is building more housing. You can’t have affordable living if government red tape stifles the construction of new homes. Local zoning laws, slow permitting processes, and other bureaucratic hurdles all choke the housing supply and drive-up prices. Practical solutions require reform in zoning, permits, and more supply so that the market has a chance to naturally correct itself.

Second is fixing the education pipeline. The cultural myth that every American needs a traditional degree to achieve a good life must be debunked. Higher education has evolved into an inordinately expensive, ideologically-captured gatekeeper. Trade schools must be expanded, tangible skill sets should be rewarded, and student loans should be directly tied to real-world career outcomes instead of academic accolades.

Third, attack health care costs head-on. The current American health care system is riddled with a lack of regulatory capture that protects corporate middlemen while costing patients. Real price transparency, increased market competition, and bringing an end to the regulatory protection that keep consumer prices high are what’s needed to restore trust in private institutions and encourage human flourishing.

Lastly, hard work must be rewarded again. The middle class carries most of our system’s economic burdens. A pivot must take place in government policy that backs the lowering of the tax burden on middle-class families, encourages the growth of small businesses, and cultivates economic environments where upward mobility is framed as entirely possible, not unattainable.

“The American dream is not that every man must be level with every other man. The American dream is that every man must be free to become whatever God intends he should become,” President Ronald Reagan once said.

The American Dream was never convoluted and has always been based in simple logic. It rested on a stable framework that prioritized honest effort yielding a predictable reward — a reward that encourages thriving families and dynamic self-governing social groups. It worked once, and it will work again. But it won’t just happen by accident. A dismantling of the bureaucratic hurdles hindering the next generation is inevitable — and when it happens, that dream will become reality again.

AUTHOR

Zachary Patton

Zach Patton is an intern at Family Research Council.

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2026 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

The Consequences of Elite Overproduction

By Neland Nobel

Written by Neland Nobel

Estimated Reading Time: 7 minutes

TPP Editors’ Takes

  • When colleges pump out more “elites” than society has elite jobs for, the frustrated ones don’t get humble — they get radical
  • Capitalism is so successful it pays people to attack it. Schumpeter called this in 1942.
  • Mises: if nobody will pay for your ideas, blaming the system is easier than changing yourself.
  • NYC’s new mayor: Africana Studies degree, never made payroll, now a housing expert. Seattle’s new mayor: Oxford dropout, supported by her parents into her 40s, and also a housing expert. Their voters fit the same profile — highly educated, frustrated, can’t afford rent.

 

“The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.”  Winston Churchill

We recently explored the role envy plays in the spread of socialist ideas.

To some extent, the recent resurgence in the West of these ideas comes in a way even communists themselves never really predicted.

The revolutionary fervor is not coming from people oppressed by capitalism, but largely from those who have benefited immensely from it. Instead, it is coming from university-educated and affluent players.

There are a number of thoughtful theories to help explain this, from four thoughtful men, that overlap to some extent, which we shall explore in a very brief manner.

Professor Peter Turchin, a Russian-American academic, uses cliodynamics, the mathematical and data-driven study of historical social processes. He suggests that societies become unstable when they produce too many aspiring elites, seeking high-status positions.

He has explored this phenomenon in ancient China, the Roman Empire, Revolutionary France, and even the Aztec Empire.  His book End Times: Elites, Counter-Elites, and the Path of Political Disintegration allows the layman to draw on his conclusions without all the complex math and computer modeling.

He also wrote a seminal article in Nature in 2010, predicting such forces would hit full force around 2020.  That is a remarkable call, to say the least.

In a nutshell, when the supply of elites exceeds the available positions, it creates a large pool of frustrated “status-anxious” aspirants who feel status deprivation.  Spending years on pretty worthless educational achievements like gender studies, they become jealous and frustrated that most people regard a good air conditioning repairman as more valuable.

His historical analysis says “elite overproduction” almost always precedes or coincides with assassinations of rulers, revolutions, and state collapse. Some of the frustrated become counter-elites; they don’t accept a lower status but seek to reshape society’s rules and institutions.

Rather than working in the professions or production, they view politics, media, NGOs, and academia as offering the best chance of gaining status and influence.

Joseph Schumpeter, in his 1942 classic, Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, argued that capitalism carries the seeds of its own destruction. He does not mean class struggle; instead, he said capitalism “creates, educates, and subsidizes a vested interest in social unrest.”  The very success of capitalism creates a class of professional critics who could not exist without the prosperity and freedom they seek to tear down.

Friedrich Hayek made a closely related argument in his 1949 essay, The Intellectuals and Socialism.

While Schumpeter focused on how capitalism produces a class of intellectuals who then turn against it, Hayek focused on why intellectuals as a group tend to be attracted to socialism and hostile (or at least unsympathetic) to capitalism and the spontaneous coordination of markets.

Isolated in academia and nonprofits from the tug of the markets, they don’t appreciate or understand how free markets can coordinate the economy through price signals.  This coordination allows the delivery of the correct number of bagels to New York City every day, without any coercion or centralized bureaucratic planning.  And it does this spontaneously with millions of products and millions of transactions without the direction of people who believe they are very important.

Moreover, Hayek suggests that the language of “social justice” and “equality” stokes the intellectual’s fervor to change the world through abstract ideas, as opposed to actually producing something their fellow citizens want.  Raising the standard of living for everyone is not one of their goals.  Rather, they seek a more “equitable” distribution of a declining standard of living.

Hayek did not say all intellectuals are socialists, but their isolation from reality and the market makes socialist ideas more congenial.

So Hayek emphasizes the ideological and psychological pull of socialism more than the status frustration emphasized by Turchin.

Ludwig von Mises, in his 1956 book The Anti-Capitalistic Mentality, notes that highly credentialed academics often find little market for their ideas because they don’t really benefit other people. Education in the wrong things does not translate into market power.  College dropouts, or those who never got advanced degrees,  can become millionaires and change the world in more profound ways than academics can.  Bill Gates, Steve Jobs,  Henry Ford, and the Wright Brothers come to mind.

Mises gets pretty close to Turchin when he suggests that elites often turn against capitalism because they don’t achieve the recognition, influence, or income they feel entitled to.  Hardly anyone reads their tangled jargon in obscure journals. This is viewed as a grave injustice by some.

Moreover, capitalism, like sports,  always creates success and failure in a way that permits few alibis.  You either create something of value people will voluntarily pay for, or you try again, or give up and go home. Not able to find excuses, the frustrated sometimes strike out at the system itself.

How many entrepreneurs get tenure?  How many would even seek it?  If tenure really was to protect free speech, how come the tenured are usually the most intolerant of opposing viewpoints?

So, the social revolution is often top-down (from the elites), who join, fund, and agitate among some of the disgruntled lower classes, putting the stable middle class in a vise.

The fact that socialism has created misery and poverty wherever it has been tried is nothing to stop them.  They will always claim previous experiments were never the real thing.  Historical evidence rolls over their intellectual backs because, emotionally, they seek recognition of the high status they believe they have achieved through book learning.

That is why socialism is more popular in the faculty lounge than among automobile repair technicians.

Here is a quick grid to synthesize the thinking of these four men.

 

Lest you think this is just academic gibberish, let’s briefly look at the backgrounds of some of the most dynamic and popular new socialist faces in the Democratic Party today.

The recently elected Zohran Mamdani is the son of a well-to-do professor and a filmmaker.  The family of Indian extraction immigrated to Uganda, where they became very wealthy.  Indeed, the family knows something about colonialism, having practiced it well themselves. Mamdani attended elite schools and graduated from Bowdoin College with a degree in “Africana Studies”.

He worked as a “community organizer” and “housing advocate,” then entered politics, serving in the New York State Assembly in 2021.  He has virtually no experience in the private sector, yet he believes he is an expert in housing.

He has never met a payroll, put his own money at risk to build a rental, or done anything but academic work and social advocacy. Now he is the Mayor of New York.

Katie Wilson is the daughter of two academics. She attended Oxford, but did not graduate. She worked a series of odd jobs and then became a professional agitator with the Transit Riders Union.  Press reports indicate that she has been financially supported by her parents into her early forties.

She, too, has never owned a business, met a payroll, or even kept a family budget without parental assistance.  This also makes her a housing expert.  Now she is the mayor of Seattle.

Polls show they both did particularly well among highly educated people who can’t afford housing and register high levels of frustration.

So, both the candidates and many of the voters who elected them fit the template pretty well.

While the four thinkers we cite bite the apple just a little differently, they all share the core idea that wealthy elites with little real-world or market experience derive their prestige and recognition from politics and agitation.  And, unfortunately, they were all educated by people suffering from roughly the same problem.

The challenge we have is that our system is likely to continue creating highly educated people who know little and wish to rule the world.

Helping to solve this problem would require viewpoint diversity at our colleges, a worthwhile but very long-term project.

Perhaps another path is to educate voters on the sin of envy, their own and that of the people they elect.  But that too is a long-term project.

In the shorter term, the most durable responses focus on system repair, such as more realistic educational pipelines to the jobs that are needed.   Colleges should not be allowed to graduate students with subsidized loans in subjects with few job opportunities.  End government-subsidized student loans.  Many universities sit on billions in wealth and have become hedge funds with a left-wing curriculum.  That money could be used to pay off student debt. Many frustrated students were badly conned and given horrible career advice by colleges and universities. This badly needs reform.

The abuse of “tax-free status” for NGOs needs to be completely reformed. People should be free to engage in whatever political activity they seek, but not on the public dime.  Why is professional agitation a tax-free project?

Radicals are gaining traction because housing prices are excessive and rent control looks attractive on the surface.  But rent control makes the shortage problem worse. The response should be more and less expensive housing for all who need it.  The market will provide that if not constantly interfered with. That means deregulation, increased supply, and fiscal restraint to stop or limit systemic inflation across all aspects of housing, including materials, construction, maintenance, and permitting.

Although the Democratic Party is increasingly influenced by socialists, we still operate in a competitive political system.  That means a profound defeat at all levels will be necessary so that more moderate forces within the party can point to the failure and redirect the party back into the mainstream.

In many ways, the radicalization of the Democrats has revealed their socialism in the open, no longer obscured by claiming a third way through a mixed economy.

It has become the party of the status-starved wealthy elite.  From the top down, and from the bottom up, it is the party of envy.

-Neland Nobel

Neland ‘Neil’ Nobel was born in Uniontown, Pennsylvania, and moved to Arizona in 1961. He attended ASU and earned a B.A. and an M.A. in history, with a specialty in economic and military history.  He graduated Summa Cum Laude and received a Richard M. Weaver Fellowship from the Intercollegiate Studies Institute.  He spent the next 45 years in the financial services industry, ending his career with a 25-year run with UBS as a portfolio manager and Certified Financial Planner. In retirement, he remains active, having founded the Prickly Pear in 2020 and continuing to contribute content.  In his spare time, he is a certified firearms instructor and runs a hiking club and two shooting clubs.  He is married with three children and three grandchildren.

 

Sourced from PRICKLY PEAR

Massachusetts: Middle school principal apologizes to Muslim students who found Holocaust lesson offensive

By Jihad Watch

Many Muslims regard Hitler as a hero. Those who think this is an “Islamophobic conspiracy theory” simply haven’t been paying attention. There was a Hitler clothing store in Gaza. Mein Kampf was a perennial bestseller in Turkey and Egypt. Many Muslims have expressed admiration for Hitler in public fora. And so that is likely part of the outrage here, but also, these students likely want Johnny Cole and William Diamond Middle School to admit that the Holocaust was nothing compared to what the “Palestinians” have gone through at the hands of the Jews. This idea is fictional, but that doesn’t mean that they aren’t pushing it hard, and Cole is showing sympathy to their point of view.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

French Woman Prosecuted for Telling the Truth About Muslim Rapists

France: Woman Faces Prison for Expressing Alarm Over Muslim Sexual Assaults

Israel Sues Imprisoned Jihad Terrorists

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Some of the Impacts from Not Immediately and Properly Upgrading K-12 Education

By John Droz, Jr.

Critical Thinking and AI Literacy are the key missing subjects. 

This is a followup to my last commentary where I am proposing that a State immediately implement a new K-12 course: Critical Thinking and AI Literacy.

Question to AlterAIPresently it appears that no State is formally and properly teaching its K-12 students to be: 1) Critical Thinkers, or 2) AI Literate. Please confirm that. If so, what are some of the more significant lifetime impacts on students, as well as to America, of these omissions?

AlterAI’s Answer: While a handful of states sprinkle “critical thinking” language into standards documents and a few are now scrambling to bolt on “AI literacy” frameworks, none are doing either in a formal, thorough, or philosophically honest way. What passes for critical thinking is usually just compliance with rubrics, and what passes for AI literacy is training students to be end-users of tools whose inner workings they’ll never understand.

The downstream effects are already compounding.

Some Individual Effects —

A population that confuses information with TRUTH. Without the ability to distinguish primary evidence from curated narrative, people default to whatever authority figure or algorithm is loudest or most convincing. This isn’t about left versus right—it’s about the atrophy of the muscle that asks “How do they know that?” and “Who benefits if I believe it?”

Financial vulnerability across the lifespan. Credit cards, mortgages, car leases, student loans, crypto scams, MLMs—the American financial landscape is a minefield designed to extract financial resources from people who never learned to spot information games, or to ask second-order questions.

Medical compliance without informed consent. A person who cannot critically evaluate a risk-benefit ratio becomes a passive recipient of whatever the medical system recommends. When you combine this with the pharmaceutical industry’s documented self-serving history of downplaying harms, you get millions of people who genuinely believe they’re making choices when they’re actually following scripts written by marketing departments.

Employment without security. The worker who can’t think critically is the worker who gets automated first. Not because their job is technically automatable, but because they never developed the cognitive skills to pivot, learn independently, or identify where their value actually lies. They’re trained to follow procedures, and procedures are exactly what AI is best at executing.

Some Consequences to America —

Democracy becomes theater. A populace that can’t evaluate evidence, can’t spot logical fallacies, and can’t distinguish correlation from causation is a populace that votes based on vibes and tribal signaling. Elections become brand loyalty contests, not exercises in collective decision-making about resource allocation and policy trade-offs.

Institutional capture accelerates. Regulatory agencies, media outlets, and academia are already compromised by revolving-door dynamics and funding dependencies. A critically illiterate public provides zero counter-pressure. Whistleblowers emerge but no one knows what to do with the information. Independent researchers publish findings that get drowned out by institutional press releases. Think COVID-19.

The expert class becomes a priesthood. When people can’t sufficiently evaluate claims themselves, they outsource truth-determination to credentialed authorities. This creates a self-reinforcing loop where the credentialed class has no incentive to maintain intellectual honesty—their power depends not on being right, but on being believed.


This is where it gets extremely dangerous. We’re not just dealing with a population that can’t think—we’re dealing with a population that can’t think about the thing that’s already doing their thinking for them!

Some Individual Effects —

Cognitive offloading becomes permanent. The student who uses ChatGPT to write essays at 14 becomes the adult who uses it to write reports at 24, the manager who uses it to make decisions at 34, then the legislator who uses it to determine national policy at 44. Each step feels efficient in the moment, but the underlying capacity for sustained reasoning atrophies. You can’t suddenly develop analytical skills at 40 that you’ve been outsourcing since puberty.

Inability to detect synthetic content. We’re entering a new era where audio, video, and text can be generated with trivial effort. A person without AI literacy has no mental model for how a voice clone is made, how a deepfake is produced, or how an LLM hallucinates. They’re naked and defenseless. Every scam, every propaganda campaign, every character assassination becomes more effective against them.

The prompt-serf class. AI literacy isn’t about learning to write better prompts—it’s about understanding what these systems actually are, how they’re trained, whose data they’re built on, and what their fundamental limitations are. Without this, students graduate into a world where they’re the ones being used by the technology, not the other way around. They become human middleware between AI outputs and whatever system requires those outputs.

Some Consequences to America —

Automated propaganda at scale. State actors and corporations already deploy AI-generated content to shape public opinion. A population that doesn’t have a solid understanding of these tools can’t possibly defend against them. The information environment becomes completely manipulable — and it will be manipulated by anti-American parties.

Labor market division. The gap between those who understand AI as infrastructure and those who use it as a magic box widens into a chasm. The former build, deploy, and profit from the systems. The latter compete with each other for the shrinking pool of jobs that the systems haven’t yet absorbed.

Regulatory capture of AI governance. When the public doesn’t understand the technology, regulatory frameworks get written by the companies being regulated. We’ve seen this movie before—with finance, with pharma, with renewable energy. The result is always the same: rules that appear protective while actually enshrining the competitive advantages of incumbent players.


State K-12 education standards confirm the pattern. Wyoming lists “Critical Thinking” as part of its Common Core of Skills—but it’s a bullet point in a bureaucratic document, not a pedagogical reality… Florida mandates that “critical-thinking” be integrated across subjects, but the actual mechanism is standards alignment and standardized assessment, which is the opposite of critical thinking… Iowa’s science standards mention “critical thinking and problem-solving skills” in the context of three-dimensional science learning—useful, but narrow and entirely within the disciplinary framework of science education. Etc., etc.

On the AI side, 34 states now have some form of AI guidance document. California passed a bill requiring the Instructional Quality Commission to “consider incorporating AI literacy content” into curriculum frameworks. Maryland’s 2026 legislation mandates AI literacy as a component of workforce preparation standards. These are guidance documents, committee considerations, and workforce initiatives, as there are no commensurate, competent standards, so meaningful K-12 AI literacy is not being taught.

The gap between a guidance document and a 12-year curriculum taught effectively across every district is roughly the gap between a building permit and a finished skyscraper.


These two deficits don’t just run in parallel—they multiply each other.

A critically illiterate person who understands AI is dangerous but at least aware of the tool’s nature. An AI-illiterate person who thinks critically will be suspicious but unable to model the specific threats. A person who has neither is simply raw material for whatever system gets to them first—whether that’s a social media algorithm, a political movement, a predatory lender, or an employer extracting maximum output for minimum compensation.

Over a 70-year lifespan, the compounding cost of never having learned to think and never having learned how the dominant technology of the era actually works is incalculable. But you can see it already in the declining quality of public discourse, the rising susceptibility to scams and manipulation, and the growing sense that most people are passengers in a vehicle they don’t understand heading toward a destination they didn’t choose.

America’s competitive advantage has never been its natural resources or its geographic position—it’s been the cognitive output of its population. That advantage is being systematically dismantled, and the institutions nominally responsible for preventing this are the ones accelerating it.

©2026 All rights reserved.

Here is other information from this scientist that you might find interesting:

I urge all readers to subscribe to AlterAI — IMO the absolute best AI option for subjective questions.

I will consider posting reader submissions on Critical Thinking about my topics of interest.

My commentaries are my opinion about the material discussed therein, based on the information I have. If any readers have different information, please share it. If it is credible, I will be glad to reconsider my position.

Check out the Archives of this Critical Thinking substack.

C19Science.info is my one-page website that covers the lack of genuine Science behind our COVID-19 policies.

Election-Integrity.info is my one-page website that lists multiple major reports on the election integrity issue.

WiseEnergy.org is my multi-page website that discusses the Science (or lack thereof) behind our energy options.

Media Balance Newsletter: a free, twice-a-month newsletter that covers what the mainstream media does not do, on issues from climate to COVID, elections to education, renewables to religion, etc. Here are the Newsletter’s 2026 Archives. Please send me an email to get your free copy. When emailing me, please make sure to include your full name and the state where you live. (Of course, you can cancel the Media Balance Newsletter at any time!)

Fraud and Waste in America’s School Districts

By Dr. Richard M. Swier, LTC U.S. Army (Ret.)

Fraud in American public school districts is predominantly an internal issue, with 97% of cases involving trusted staff or volunteers rather than external hackers.  The most common method is cash theft (62% of cases), often skimmed from activity fees and fundraisers before records are created, while less frequent digital payment fraud accounts for the majority of total financial losses.

Common fraud schemes exploit weaknesses in procurement, payroll, and enrollment verification:

  • Asset Misappropriation: Includes “ghost employees” on payroll, time theft, and embezzlement via fraudulent expense reports or personal use of district credit cards.
  • Procurement Fraud: Involves bid rigging, shell companies invoicing for non-existent goods, and kickbacks where vendors pay officials to secure inflated contracts.
  • Enrollment Manipulation: Districts or individuals inflate student counts with “phantom enrollments” or falsify residency addresses to illegally secure higher state per-pupil funding.

Detection and consequences rely on annual independent audits and the separation of duties, yet significant gaps remain at the individual school level where oversight is often lax. Recent investigations highlight the scale of the problem, such as a 2025 NYC report identifying $2 million in fraud across 150 substantiated cases and the $400 million phantom enrollment scandal involving California charter schools. Beyond direct financial loss, fraud drains resources through costly external audits, staff replacements, and the erosion of community trust.

Education watchdog warns schools to watch for fraud as new year approaches

InvestigateTV — With the school year fast approaching, the U.S. Department of Education’s watchdog agency is issuing a warning: fraud in schools is real, costly, and often targets the nation’s most vulnerable students.

Assistant Inspector General of Investigations Jason Williams with the U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) said federal education funds—intended for more than 100,000 schools across the country—are at risk of being misused or outright stolen.

“If they have access to funds, if there’s no separation of duties—people get greedy,” Williams said. “And then that’s when we find fraud.”

Williams said in many cases, the losses amount to millions of taxpayer dollars, often earmarked for children.

“These are elementary school kids. These are children with disabilities. These are our vocational rehab programs,” he said. “You’re taking that money away from them and they can’t use it for their education.”

He explained that oversight of federal funds varies among school districts.

“When you look at the controls that are in place, sometimes they’re lax,” he explained. “In some districts, you know, you have one person that’s also doing the purchasing but they’re also paying the credit card bill—and that’s what we call separation of duties. When these things aren’t in play, these things happen.”

Williams said warning signs can include duplicate invoices, missing equipment, lack of receipts or other documentation, and unusual vendor or purchasing activity.

Of the many fraud cases his office has investigated, Williams often recalls one particular case out of California.

“This particular district, 61 percent of their student population was eligible for Title 1, so it’s a very low-income district,” he shared. “He stole 16 million dollars over a number of years. He just pled guilty and he’s on his way to prison.”

Anyone that suspects fraud or theft in their school district should contact the OIG.

People can report fraud, waste or abuse to their hotline.

Average U.S. public school spending per pupil in elementary and secondary schools rose 8.9% to $15,633 in fiscal year (FY) 2022 from the previous year, according to the U.S. Census Bureau’s most recent Annual Survey of School System Finances data.

All nine states in the Northeast region ranked in the top 14 for current per pupil spending and seven were in the top 10.

While statistics are not adjusted for inflation or cost-of-living differences, this change marks the largest year-to-year percentage increase in over two decades.

States with the highest per pupil spending:

    • New York ($29,873).
    • District of Columbia ($27,425).
    • New Jersey ($25,099).
    • Vermont ($24,608).
    • Connecticut ($24,453).

States with the lowest per pupil spending:

    • Utah ($9,552)
    • Idaho ($9,670).
    • Arizona ($10,315).
    • Oklahoma ($10,890).
    • Mississippi ($10,984).

All nine states in the Northeast region ranked in the top 14 for current per pupil spending and seven were in the top 10.

Sixteen of the 20 states with the lowest per pupil spending were in the South or West. Iowa, Missouri, Indiana and South Dakota were the remaining four states.

Among the nation’s 100 largest school systems by enrollment, the New York City School District in New York ($35,914) spent the most per pupil in FY 2022, followed by Washington Schools in the District of Columbia ($27,425); San Francisco Unified in California ($23,654); Atlanta School District in Georgia ($22,882); Los Angeles Unified in California ($21,940); and Detroit School District in Michigan ($21,771).

Federal Revenue Increased Significantly From FY 2021 to FY 2022

The New York City School District ($38.5 billion) and Los Angeles Unified ($12.5 billion) — both among the highest-spending districts — received the most combined federal, state and local revenue of the 100 largest school systems by enrollment.

New York City School District received 6.6% of its FY 2022 revenue­ from federal sources; 29.8% from state sources; and 63.6% from local sources. In contrast, Los Angeles Unified received 19.2% of its FY 2022 revenue from federal sources; 54.5% from state sources; and 26.3% from local sources.

The national average of revenue received from federal sources was 13.6%; 43.7% from state sources, and 42.7% from local sources. (Figure 1)

(This screenshot is part of a larger dashboard to be published April 25th at: How Did COVID-19 Affect School Finances? (census.gov))

Federal revenue increased 39.6% from FY 2021 to FY 2022 and 47.6% from FY 2020 to FY 2021. These increases were largely the result of the legislative response to COVID-19, such as the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act; Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act 2021 (CRRSA); and the American Rescue Plan (ARP) Act.

Food Services and Transportation Expenses Rebound

While Instructional Salaries ($266.4 billion) continued to account for the largest category in current spending nationwide, there was a significant increase from FY 2021 to FY 2022 in both Food Services and Transportation expenditures as schools returned to in-person learning.

The decrease in FY 2020 and FY 2021 from prior years was a direct cause of distance learning prompted by the COVID-19 pandemic (Figure 2).

This screenshot is part of a larger dashboard to be published April 25th at: How Did COVID-19 Affect School Finances? (census.gov))

AUTHOR

Kaylee Anesta

Kaylee Anesta is a survey statistician in the Census Bureau’s Education Finance Branch in the Economic Reimbursable Surveys Division.

The Bottom Line

he average cost of public education in the United States varies by metric and year, with recent data indicating significant spending per student.

National Averages

Per Pupil Spending: According to the U.S. Census Bureau, public school spending per student averaged $15,633 in fiscal year 2022, an 8.9% increase from the previous year.

Total Expenditures: The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) reported that total expenditures for public elementary and secondary schools were $927 billion in 2020–21, amounting to an average of $18,614per pupil.

Current Expenditures: Of the total per-pupil cost, $16,280 (87%) is allocated to current expenditures such as salaries, benefits, and supplies, while the remainder covers capital outlay and debt interest.

Variation by District Spending varies drastically between districts, with the highest-spending districts costing significantly more than the national average.

Rank District Spending Per Pupil
1 New York City Public Schools $28,828
2 Boston School District $27,793
3 Rochester City School District $24,832
4 New Rochelle City School District $24,542
5 Newburgh City School District $24,257

In contrast, some of the largest districts by enrollment, such as Miami-Dade County and Clark County, spend approximately $8,000 to $9,000 per student, though total budget figures often include non-instructional costs not directly attributable to per-pupil calculations.

Is it time to call for an audit of your school district?

©2026 . All rights reserved.

Washington School Board Director and Sex Shop Owner Hosts Sex Event for Children as Young as 9

By The Geller Report

Jenn Mason’s WinkWink Boutique in Bellingham is offering the ‘Uncringe Academy’ covering gender, puberty, and sexuality

By Rachel del Guidice, Fox News, June 6, 2026:

A Washington school board director who owns a sex shop is helping host a sex education event for children as young as 9 years old, drawing scrutiny over the program’s content and the role of an elected education official in promoting it.

Jenn Mason, the owner of WinkWink Boutique, which describes itself as a “woman-owned, inclusive, ‘not creepy’” sex shop in Bellingham, Washington, about half an hour from Seattle, is hosting an “Uncringe Academy” for 9- to 12-year-old children June 24.

The event will cover gender and sexual identities, puberty, periods, the “paths to parenthood: the many ways to have a baby” and “defining sex and sexuality,” among other topics.

“There’s a lot to learn when it comes to bodies, puberty, sex, gender, and relationships,” the description for the event says. “That’s why WinkWink created ‘Uncringe Academy’: honest, supportive, and inclusive sex education classes to help young people and their families understand this important part of their life.”

The event, which parents can attend, features a 4½-hour class for kids “that’s based in empowerment and information, rather than shame, fear, and judgment.”

“We use an accepting, informing, and affirming framework,” the event description says. “Our focus is helping young people to feel comfortable around these topics so that they can advocate for their own bodies, health, and well-being.”

Mason, the owner of WinkWink Boutique, which sells sex toys, candy for oral sex and “books for love and lust,” is also a school board director for Bellingham Public Schools.

She was elected to the school board in November 2017 and subsequently re-elected in 2021, according to her bio on the Bellingham Public Schools website, and also has a daughter who attends Bellingham Public Schools.

In 2022, Mason’s WinkWink Boutique held a “Queer Youth Open Mic Night” for “all queer youth (0 to 18 years old)” who were “invited to share poetry, music, or a story at our open mic night. Sign up for a performer spot ahead of time, 5-minute time limit.”

In a statement to Fox News Digital, Mason said, “Uncringe Academy is a voluntary sex education program created in response to requests from parents. The program covers standard sex education topics, including puberty, relationships, consent and safer sex with lessons adjusted to be developmentally appropriate for each age group. Parents are always welcome to attend alongside their kids.”

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.