‘Growing Body of Evidence’ Shows COVID-19 Leaked from Chinese Lab: U.S. Official


And this is news. Always known. The only ones denying it was the ChiCom-supported Democrat media complex.

‘Growing body of evidence’ shows COVID-19 leaked from Chinese lab: US official

By Sara Dorn. The NY Post, January 2, 2021 |
U.S. National Security Adviser Matthew Pottinger is doubling down on the theory that COVID-19 leaked from a Chinese government-run lab in Wuhan.
Pottinger, a staunch critic of Beijing, allegedly made the claim in a recent Zoom meeting with British officials.
“There is a growing body of evidence that the lab is likely the most credible source of the virus,” Pottinger reportedly said, according to the Daily Mail.
The Trump appointee pushed the theory as the European Union made a new investment deal with China last week over protests from Pottinger and hesitance from the incoming Biden administration.
Pottinger, one of the first U.S. officials to raise alarms inside White House walls about the origins of the virus back in January 2020, has reportedly suspected since the early days of the outbreak that the coronavirus originated in a Chinese lab.
He ordered U.S. intelligence agencies to search for evidence that it had, the New York Times reported in April.
A Chinese virologist who said she did some of the earliest research on COVID-19 has publicly claimed COVID-19 was man-made, and that the Chinese government covered up its dangers. Western medical experts have discredited the theory.
see also
Wuhan ‘bat woman’ open to inspection to prove COVID did not originate in lab
The World Health Organization has been investigating the source of the virus since the first case was made public in January 2020. Patient Zero has not been found.
Pottinger suggested in the recent call with British officials that the WHO probe is a ruse.
“MPs around the world have a moral role to play in exposing the WHO investigation as a Potemkin exercise,” Pottinger told the parliamentarians, referring to fake villages created in Crimea in the 18th Century to convince the visiting Russian Empress Catherine the Great that the region was in good health.
“Even establishment figures in Beijing have openly dismissed the wet market story,” Pottinger allegedly said, referring to another theory that the virus was transmitted from animals to humans inside a wildlife market in Wuhan where the first cluster of cases emerged.

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Here’s the List of GOP Senators Who Will Oppose Electoral College Results


If your senator is not on this list then contact their office.
https://twitter.com/TeamTrump/status/1345443164283412480?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1345443164283412480%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fgellerreport.com%2F2021%2F01%2Fthe-great-senators-election-fraud.html%2F

Here’s the List of GOP Senators Who Will Oppose Electoral College Results

By Todd Starnes, January 2, 2020
DEVELOPING STORY: Sen. Ted Cruz will lead a coalition of Republican senators and senators-elect to object to the Jan. 6 certification of the presidential election results.
Cruz — along with Sens. Ron Johnson, R-Wis.; James Lankford, R-Okla.; Steve Daines, R-Mont.; John Kennedy, R-La.; Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., and Mike Braun, R-Ind.; as well as Sens.-elect Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo.; Roger Marshall, R-Kansas; Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., and Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala. — say that the election “featured unprecedented allegations of voter fraud and illegal conduct.”
This group is separate from one announced by Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., who said this week that he would object to what he said was the failure of some states — most notably Pennsylvania — to follow their own election laws.
“Voter fraud has posed a persistent challenge in our elections, although its breadth and scope are disputed.  By any measure, the allegations of fraud and irregularities in the 2020 election exceed any in our lifetimes,” the lawmakers say in a statement.
Following is the entire joint statement:

“America is a Republic whose leaders are chosen in democratic elections. Those elections, in turn, must comply with the Constitution and with federal and state law.

“When the voters fairly decide an election, pursuant to the rule of law, the losing candidate should acknowledge and respect the legitimacy of that election. And, if the voters choose to elect a new office-holder, our Nation should have a peaceful transfer of power.

“The election of 2020, like the election of 2016, was hard fought and, in many swing states, narrowly decided. The 2020 election, however, featured unprecedented allegations of voter fraud, violations and lax enforcement of election law, and other voting irregularities.

“Voter fraud has posed a persistent challenge in our elections, although its breadth and scope are disputed. By any measure, the allegations of fraud and irregularities in the 2020 election exceed any in our lifetimes.

“And those allegations are not believed just by one individual candidate. Instead, they are widespread. Reuters/Ipsos polling, tragically, shows that 39% of Americans believe ‘the election was rigged.’ That belief is held by Republicans (67%), Democrats (17%), and Independents (31%).

“Some Members of Congress disagree with that assessment, as do many members of the media.

“But, whether or not our elected officials or journalists believe it, that deep distrust of our democratic processes will not magically disappear. It should concern us all. And it poses an ongoing threat to the legitimacy of any subsequent administrations.

RELATED TWEET:


RELATED ARTICLES:
Report: Biden’s Inaugural Parade Viewing Stands Taken Down – Parade in Doubt
Sen. Hawley challenges Sen. Toomey to a debate on the Senate floor
Pence Welcomes Efforts by Lawmakers to Object to Electoral College Votes on Jan. 6
EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

The Wall Street Journal Punts on Election Integrity

The Wall Street Journal and Investor’s Business Daily have the best editorial pages in the country.

It was with some disappointment we read their main editorial in the WSJ on December 31, 2020.

Like many in the “legacy” Conservative movement, they just want to sweep signs of election fraud under the rug and move on with a Democratic President. They don’t seem to appreciate that fully half or more of the country believes the results were fraudulent.

Election fraud is serious stuff. It is more important than any legislative act because election fraud undermines faith in the entire democratic system we have. Why engage in politics at all, if the whole game can be rigged?

We readily admit the process to solve this is quite complicated and we urge readers to sit through the entire interview conducted by The Epoch Times and reproduced in our video section.

Perhaps Democrats should have appreciated all this before they launched their fraudulent actions.

What we don’t buy is the insinuation by the WSJ that there is nothing to the charges of fraud. We think they are substantial enough to warrant some kind of judicial inquiry, Congressional hearings, or commission.

The WSJ passes out the canard that there is nothing to the fraud claims because no court has ruled as such, including some conservative justices. We say canard because the WSJ knows full well that suits have been rejected on technical grounds like standing, or time frames, and no court has actually seen any evidence and ruled on it.

Courts have repeatedly interfered in the election process, but now that they are being asked in this case to interfere, they act like this is something they should never get involved in. Gee, you can’t have it both ways, can you? Some legal consistency from the courts would be appreciated.

So, if the courts demur, then the Congress has to be involved. That is what Trump is calling for.

The WSJ says Republicans should be embarrassed “by Mr. Trump’s Electoral hustle.”

How do we know its just a hustle unless evidence is developed and then presented? As we have suggested before, if Trump has this all wrong and there is no evidence, then shame on him. However, the WSJ has resources to investigate. That is part of their job. Why do the resent citizens who have developed evidence and are begging for their case to be heard?

Near the end of their piece, they drop what may be the real reason legacy media and some Republican officials shy away from demanding election integrity.

“…what do Republicans think would happen if Mr. Pence pulled the trigger, Mr. Biden were denied 270 electoral votes, and the House chose Mr. Trump as President? Riots in the streets would be the least of it.”

So, let’s see if we get this straight. Democrats systematically cheat (or not, depending on the evidence), but we should not use the Constitutional and Judicial processes we have, because the outcome would cause Democrats to riot.

There is no right to riot. Why is only one political party given a pass on the use of violence to advance their political agenda? Why is the use of violence permitted at all?

Likely because they noticed that Democrats were rioting most of the summer, devastating cities like Minneapolis, Portland, and Seattle.

Democrats will have their say in court and they will have their say in the Congress. Why the assumption that violence will be the outcome? If the claims of election fraud are a “hustle”, Democrats will easily prevail in the process. That should be a reason they should support the process.

Further, what do they mean that rioting “would be the least of it.” Do they mean like packing the court, enlarging the Senate, or perhaps impeaching a President based on opposition party research? Democrats are quite brazen right now and capitulating would seem only to encourage them. What makes them think that looking the other way on electoral cheating and street violence will promote better behavior from Democrats?

We cannot let stand election fraud. We cannot let stand acts of violence by political parties to advance legislation or determine electoral outcomes.

We cannot accept violence as a way to get what you want. If we do, our republic will be badly damaged.

Let us have a peaceful process to determine whether or not fraud took place.

But let’s have the process proceed and not act like nothing was strange in the last election.

Reflections on Christmas 2020 and 1968

Whether they were atheist, Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, Confucian, or anything else, one of the most moving experiences of humanity was the message of the Apollo 8 astronauts on Christmas Eve, 1968, as they left lunar orbit and headed for the blue and white planet of Earth, which stood out in the blackness of space.

It is estimated that quarter of the world’s population heard the message live.

Frank Borman, Jim Lovell and Bill Anders took turns reading the first words of Genesis from the Bible. Historical photos of Mission Control in Houston show engineers in short-sleeve white shirts with tears in the eyes. Likewise, old films of scenes from around the world show people of all nationalities and races looking up at the sky in the same emotional state.

That could never have happened in 2020.

First, amazingly, when Borman had asked NASA what they should say on Christmas, officials responded that they should say something appropriate. It is unimaginable that they would’ve been given that much freedom today.

In 2020, the message would’ve been drafted by multiple committees at NASA, run past the agency’s office of diversity and inclusion, sent to the State Department for review, and from there to the White House for final revisions. After being chopped, diced and sanitized, the message would’ve been something like this:

Greetings from space. We look forward to returning to Earth to lead the fight for social justice, racial and gender equity, income equality, equal outcomes, and green energy—and as white men of European descent, to atone for slavery, colonialism, imperialism, capitalism, and fossil fuels. We pledge that astronauts on future lunar missions will be representative of all races, all ethnic groups, all genders, all sexual orientations, and all family arrangements.

We’re sorry to break it to our wives and children this way, but in that spirit of enlightenment, Frank has decided to become Francine, and Jim and Bill are going to marry each other—in a civil ceremony, of course. We hope to be chosen for the lunar landing and the planting of the United Nations flag on the moon.

With that message, tears of joy would be flowing down the cheeks of residents of San Francisco, Greenwich Village, Portland, and faculty lounges across the land.

Fifty-two years ago, all of the astronauts were white males, and almost all of Mission Control was the same. This was due to cultural norms at the time and to the GI Bill after WWII, which was a way of compensating returning soldiers for their years of service, by offering them a free college education. The bill had the unintended consequence of filling the engineering pipeline with males, to the exclusion of females.

Now, more women than men graduate from college, although not necessarily from engineering programs. And the number of African-Americans with college degrees has increased dramatically. As a result, in a positive development, if Apollo 8 took place today, Mission Control would not look like Mission Control of yesteryear.

For the men, crewcuts, pocket protectors, and slide rules would be out. Untucked shirts and scraggly beards would be in, except for those who wanted the androgynous look of android Mark Zuckerberg.

To make a statement about not wanting to be treated like sex objects, the women in Mission Control would be wearing tight yoga pants, revealing every nook and cranny of their Peloton bodies.

Woman and men, and everyone in between, in a display of their independent thinking and refusal to go along with fashion trends, would be sporting tattoos, piercings, and nose rings.

Instead of NASA’s parking lot being full of Chevy, Ford and Chrysler station wagons, it would be full of Teslas, Priuses, Subarus, and SUVs the size of the command module.

There has been lots of good news for the nation as a whole since 1968. For example, income has increased significantly from 1968, even for those at the bottom of society. In inflation-adjusted dollars, income for the bottom quintile of Americans has increased 45% over the last 52 years.

There has been lots of bad news, also. Paradoxically, for example, the percent of single-parent families has more than doubled since 1968; the suicide rate has increased 35% over the last 20 years; deaths from drug overdoses are at a record high; less than a third of Americans now say that most people can be trusted, versus the half of Americans who said that in the early 1970s; racial tensions and political divisiveness are as high as they were in 1968; record numbers of homeless are being left to live and die on city streets, and China, where COVID-19 was hatched, is demonstrating that its brand of authoritarianism and its anti-diversity policies just might prevail over America’s liberal democracy and diversity.

If current trends continue, future astronauts will be reading from Mao’s Little Red Book on Christmas Eve.

That will bring tears of joy to the residents of San Francisco, Greenwich Village, Portland, and faculty lounges across the land.

A Report on 2020 State Presidential Vote Dumps


We’ve all heard stories about hard-to-explain vote spikes in the 2020 Presidential election. Although I’ve seen a few reports reference some limited examples of these, I’m not aware of an investigation that looked at a wide range of states to see how prevalent these anomalies are.
Although some of these spikes (aka dumps) could have a legitimate explanation, considering the rest of the evidence that has now been exposed, it’s likely that these are another example of malfeasance by bad actors.

Since our Team is up for another vote integrity challenge, we decided to do a report on this one topic.
I can definitely say that it was the most time-consuming report we’ve done to date. One reason is that the Edison vote data (the supposed gold standard of vote info) has substantial variations in it, from revision date to revision date. Furthermore, the latest revision is not necessarily the most accurate.

In any case our newest report just got posted online, so please pass it on.

Add this to our collection of multiple election efforts, including:

Our Pennsylvania Report,

Our Claudia Tenney Report (NY22),
My post-Electoral College commentary: When Will the Fat Lady Sing?
Other reports on Georgia, Wisconsin, etc.,

As always, if corrections are needed, I’ll do an update of the post.
TY for your support. Hopefully our report will give several federal legislators some courage to take an uncompromising stand for election integrity.
PS — I often get asked what are the best other election-related reports out there. Although I don’t claim to have done exhaustive research on other reports, here are some of my favorites:

  1. The Nevada Report by attorney Jesse Binnall.
  2. The Antrim Michigan (Dominion) Report done by Russ Ramsland.
  3. The Immaculate Deception Report by Peter Navarro.
  4. A Judicial Watch Study that concluded that 353 US counties have more registered voters than people eligible to vote.
  5. Here is an interesting compendium of actions and claims. Here is another interesting  collection. And yet another. There is loads of concrete information in those collections, but it would take awhile to sort through them all.
  6. Lastly you might want to do searches over the 2020 archives of my Newsletter, where I referenced over a hundred articles and reports about the election mess. They include fascinating ones like this that I never heard a resolution of.

RELATED TWEET:


©John Droz, Jr. All rights reserved.

Election Integrity Group Meets with Legislators from Contested States


AMHERST, Va.Jan. 2, 2021 /PRNewswire/ — Got Freedom?, a 501(c)4 nonprofit election integrity watchdog group, conducted an exclusive national briefing today at the request of state legislators from Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin to review the extensive evidence of irregularities and lawlessness in the 2020 presidential election. A similar briefing is being scheduled in Washington, D.C. at the request of Members of Congress.
The documentation discussed during the briefing — which includes more than 1,400 pages of material — is being made available for public consumption at https://got-freedom.org/evidence/.
Nearly 300 state lawmakers and others participated in the briefing, which also featured an address by President Trump. Also on the call were Rudy Giuliani; professor of law John EastmanPeter Navarro, Assistant to the President for Trade and Manufacturing (appearing in his personal capacity), and John Lott, Senior Advisor, U.S. Department of Justice (also appearing in his personal capacity).
“This information should serve as an important resource for state legislators as they make calls for state legislatures to meet to investigate the election and consider decertifying their state election results,” said Phill Kline, who hosted the call on behalf of Got Freedom?. “The integrity of our elections is far too important to treat cavalierly, and elected officials deserve to have all relevant information at their disposal as they consider whether to accept the reported results of the 2020 elections, especially in states where the process was influenced by private interests.”
The evidence discussed includes unprecedented public-private partnerships that created a two-tiered election system in the states that determined the winner of the Electoral College. Funded by over $400 million from Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg, these public-private partnerships sought to boost turnout in Democratic strongholds while depressing turnout in conservative areas, violating constitutional guarantees of due process and equal protection.
The private monies paid the salaries of election workers and funded the purchase of election equipment, but came with strict conditions on the conduct of elections in jurisdictions that accepted the money. These private interventions were aided by the actions of public officials, who sought to undermine transparency, fought efforts to audit the results, threatened legislators with investigation and prosecution for questioning the reported results, and in some cases even physically prevented state lawmakers from entering the Capitol Building in order to prevent them from challenging election certification.
“The American people, along with their elected representatives at the state and federal level, deserve full access to the evidence we’ve uncovered,” Kline said. “We’re pleased to provide this information so that those who develop policy and make decisions will have all the relevant information available to them.”
TO LEARN MORE VISIT: GotFreedom.org
RELATED TWEET:
https://twitter.com/teamtrump/status/1345021569207332864?s=11
RELATED VIDEO: President Trump’s historic accomplishments, booming economy pointed to overwhelming victory.

President Trump: ‘Massive Amounts of Evidence Will Be Presented’ on January 6th


Living for it.

‘Massive Amounts of Evidence Will Be Presented’ on Jan. 6: Trump

By: Jack Phillips, The Epoch Times, January 1, 2021:
President Donald Trump announced that evidence of alleged election fraud will be presented on Jan. 6 during the Joint Session of Congress.
“Massive amounts of evidence will be presented on the 6th. We won, BIG!” Trump wrote on Twitter.
It comes as Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) and about 40 House GOP lawmakers have announced they would challenge the Electoral College votes during the Jan. 6 Joint Session of Congress due to alleged fraud and irregularities during the Nov. 3 election. The challenge could lead to several hours of debate during the session.
The challenge is supported by Trump, who, in recent weeks, has met with House lawmakers, including its chief sponsor Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.), at the White House.
Trump’s adviser, Jason Miller, told Newsmax earlier in the week that the team is aiming to present more evidence.
“We will have a chance in front of the American people, next week to present these cases, all these evidences of fraud,” Miller said, pointing to a lawsuit filed by Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) against Vice President Mike Pence earlier this week to prevent him from confirming Joe Biden’s electoral victory. Pence’s lawyers with the Department of Justice later said Pence isn’t the person who should face a lawsuit, arguing that Gohmert should have sued Congress.
If Hawley and the other lawmakers challenge a state’s Electoral College votes, Trump’s campaign will make their presentation. The challenge requires a senator and a representative to carry out.
Miller pointed to law changes regarding mail-in ballots in Wisconsin and other states, “suitcases of ballots” in Georgia being wheeled out late at night on Nov. 3 in Atlanta’s State Farm Center, and officials in Michigan and Arizona allegedly blocking them from inspecting voting systems. State election officials in those states have denied claims from the Trump team and third-parties about voter fraud and irregularities.
“These are the specific types of evidence we want to present to the American people on the national stage and not allow local politicians to sweep it under the rug,” Miller said on the program.
Miller and Trump did not elaborate on how they would present that information to Congress, or whether they will be able to do so.
The president, in making his announcement for Jan. 6, retweeted Hawley’s post where he said that millions of Americans are “concerned about election integrity” and “deserve to be heard.”
“Somebody has to stand up. 74 million Americans are not going to be told their voices don’t matter,” Hawley also stated.
Trump has also suggested that his supporters attend rallies and events on Jan. 6, including one in Washington D.C. at 11 a.m.

RELATED TWEET:
https://twitter.com/teamtrump/status/1345021569207332864?s=11
RELATED ARTICLE: Representatives, Senators Objecting to Electors Will Allow Trump, GOP to Air Vote Fraud Allegations
EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

READ: Electoral Statement from Senators Cruz, Johnson, Lankford, Daines, Kennedy, Blackburn, Braun, Senators-Elect Lummis, Marshall, Hagerty, Tuberville

Joint Statement from Senators Cruz, Johnson, Lankford, Daines, Kennedy, Blackburn, Braun, Senators-Elect Lummis, Marshall, Hagerty, Tuberville

January 2, 2021
WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senators Ted Cruz (R-Texas), Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), James Lankford (R-Okla.), Steve Daines (R-Mont.), John Kennedy (R-La.), Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), and Mike Braun (R-Ind.), and Senators-Elect Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.), Roger Marshall (R-Kan.), Bill Hagerty (R-Tenn.), and Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) issued the following statement in advance of the Electoral College certification process on January 6, 2021:
“America is a Republic whose leaders are chosen in democratic elections. Those elections, in turn, must comply with the Constitution and with federal and state law.
“When the voters fairly decide an election, pursuant to the rule of law, the losing candidate should acknowledge and respect the legitimacy of that election. And, if the voters choose to elect a new office-holder, our Nation should have a peaceful transfer of power.
“The election of 2020, like the election of 2016, was hard fought and, in many swing states, narrowly decided. The 2020 election, however, featured unprecedented allegations of voter fraud, violations and lax enforcement of election law, and other voting irregularities.
“Voter fraud has posed a persistent challenge in our elections, although its breadth and scope are disputed. By any measure, the allegations of fraud and irregularities in the 2020 election exceed any in our lifetimes.
“And those allegations are not believed just by one individual candidate. Instead, they are widespread. Reuters/Ipsos polling, tragically, shows that 39% of Americans believe ‘the election was rigged.’ That belief is held by Republicans (67%), Democrats (17%), and Independents (31%).
“Some Members of Congress disagree with that assessment, as do many members of the media.
“But, whether or not our elected officials or journalists believe it, that deep distrust of our democratic processes will not magically disappear. It should concern us all. And it poses an ongoing threat to the legitimacy of any subsequent administrations.
“Ideally, the courts would have heard evidence and resolved these claims of serious election fraud. Twice, the Supreme Court had the opportunity to do so; twice, the Court declined.
“On January 6, it is incumbent on Congress to vote on whether to certify the 2020 election results. That vote is the lone constitutional power remaining to consider and force resolution of the multiple allegations of serious voter fraud.
“At that quadrennial joint session, there is long precedent of Democratic Members of Congress raising objections to presidential election results, as they did in 1969, 2001, 2005, and 2017. And, in both 1969 and 2005, a Democratic Senator joined with a Democratic House Member in forcing votes in both houses on whether to accept the presidential electors being challenged.
“The most direct precedent on this question arose in 1877, following serious allegations of fraud and illegal conduct in the Hayes-Tilden presidential race. Specifically, the elections in three states-Florida, Louisiana, and South Carolina-were alleged to have been conducted illegally.
“In 1877, Congress did not ignore those allegations, nor did the media simply dismiss those raising them as radicals trying to undermine democracy. Instead, Congress appointed an Electoral Commission-consisting of five Senators, five House Members, and five Supreme Court Justices-to consider and resolve the disputed returns.
“We should follow that precedent. To wit, Congress should immediately appoint an Electoral Commission, with full investigatory and fact-finding authority, to conduct an emergency 10-day audit of the election returns in the disputed states. Once completed, individual states would evaluate the Commission’s findings and could convene a special legislative session to certify a change in their vote, if needed.
“Accordingly, we intend to vote on January 6 to reject the electors from disputed states as not ‘regularly given’ and ‘lawfully certified’ (the statutory requisite), unless and until that emergency 10-day audit is completed.
“We are not naïve. We fully expect most if not all Democrats, and perhaps more than a few Republicans, to vote otherwise. But support of election integrity should not be a partisan issue. A fair and credible audit-conducted expeditiously and completed well before January 20-would dramatically improve Americans’ faith in our electoral process and would significantly enhance the legitimacy of whoever becomes our next President. We owe that to the People.
“These are matters worthy of the Congress, and entrusted to us to defend. We do not take this action lightly. We are acting not to thwart the democratic process, but rather to protect it. And every one of us should act together to ensure that the election was lawfully conducted under the Constitution and to do everything we can to restore faith in our Democracy.”

RELATED TWEET:
https://twitter.com/teamtrump/status/1345021569207332864?s=11
RELATED ARTICLES:
Here Are the Dems Having a Fit Over Cruz’s Plans to Challenge the Election Results
If enough senators challenge the election results, Trump wins
Georgia Election Data Shows 17,650 Votes Switched From Trump to Biden: Data Scientists
YES!! A Dozen GOP Senators, Led by Ted Cruz, To OBJECT to Electoral College Certification, Demand Emergency Audit
PROOF: Desperate Cover-Ups Prove Criminal Conspiracy to Overthrow Election
EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Hilaria Baldwin Shows That Racism Still Lives in America, But Not How You Might Think


Hilaria Baldwin has been claiming to be Spanish for a decade, as Megan Fox details here (and Stephen Kruiser hilariously skewers here), but now that she has been outed as being the daughter of two old Boston families, she made the obligatory Maoist self-incrimination that our moral superiors demand. “I am a white girl. Let’s be very clear that Europe has a lot of white people in there.” But for all the ridicule Hilaria Baldwin is receiving, there is much more to this story than the foolish audacity of one attention-seeking white girl. It reveals an ominous trend in American society today: our society is so post-racial that it’s racial again.
Hilaria Baldwin’s statement that “Europe has a lot of white people in there” is odd. Did anyone actually doubt this? Europe is, after all, the ancestral home of white people. But Hilaria seems to be assuming that if she had really been born in Spain of Spanish parents, she would not be white. And clearly, that would have been far more preferable to her than her actual background. Still, it’s odd: Spanish-speaking people from the Americas may not be white, but Spaniards generally are. Did Hilaria Baldwin, in her haste to shed her white identity and take on one that was more exotic and socially acceptable, conflate Spain with Latin America?
In any case, Europe really does have a lot of white people in it, whether or not that white population includes the people of Spain, and that’s so much the worse for Europe. It is now acceptable on the Left to despise white people as a group. Search through the Twitter feeds of The Washington Post’s Karen Attiah or activist Shaun King and you’ll see statements about “white people” in the aggregate that would result in firing and ostracism if they were said about any other race. All this has given rise to the recrudescence of one of the most shameful phenomena in American history – claiming to be of a different race in order to escape social opprobrium, as Hilaria Baldwin herself exemplifies.
Back in the old South during the Jim Crow days of institutionalized racial discrimination, some light-skinned blacks tried to pass for white in an attempt to avoid the discrimination and harassment that came to blacks all too often in those days. The old folk song “Delia” mentions “men in Atlanta, tryin’ to pass for white.” Way back in the 1980s, I saw a documentary about jazz pioneer Jelly Roll Morton that noted, in tones of high indignation, “But he denied his blackness.” Clearly, the producers of the documentary believed that even in the Jim Crow era, this was a moral failing on Morton’s part. He should have been true to himself. He should have been proud.
Nowadays the shoe is entirely on the other foot. There are still people trying to pass, who should instead be true to themselves and proud of who they are, but they’re white. Besides Hilaria Baldwin, there was the white Jewish professor Jessica Krug, who passed as black for years. So did Rachel Dolezal, the former NAACP official who famously turned out not to be a CP at all. Still at it is Shaun King, aka Talcum X, who strenuously insists that he isn’t white despite photographic evidence of his being a light-haired white child before he was woke.
Then of course there is Elizabeth Warren, as white a white person as you’ll ever find, who for years passed as Native American for social approval and career advancement. She was even hailed as the first “woman of color” on Harvard’s faculty. What color? A light peach, apparently.
Muslim “feminist” activist Linda Sarsour is also passing: in a Vox video published in January 2017, she revealed: “When I wasn’t wearing hijab I was just some ordinary white girl from New York City.” But in an April 2017 interview, Sarsour referred to “people of color like me.” All it took was a hijab to enable Sarsour to change races.
Baldwin, Krug, Warren, Dolezal, King, and Sarsour are the vanguard of the society the Left is working hard to create – a society in which being white carries so much of a social stigma that it results in job discrimination and more, and those who are clever and audacious enough to pull it off avoid this opprobrium by passing as being a “person of color.” Or a person from Spain, if you’re Hilaria Baldwin. Today, to be white is to be evil. No wonder an increasing number of white people want to escape the stigma.
All this is insane, of course. Race hatred should be no more acceptable today than it was in the days of Jelly Roll Morton, and no one should ever feel compelled to pass as a member of another race. The impulse today, however, springs from the assumption that white people are uniquely evil in a way that people of other races are not. To that, Soviet dissident Aleksander Solzhenitsyn, an enduring hero of freedom and one of the towering figures of the twentieth century, gave the most apposite response: “If only it were all so simple! If only there were evil people somewhere insidiously committing evil deeds, and it were necessary only to separate them from the rest of us and destroy them. But the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?”
RELATED ARTICLES:
Iran to host ‘Heroes of Global Counter-Terrorism’ festival celebrating Soleimani and Muhandis in Iraq
Armenian Churches Under Attack at the Hands of Azerbaijan and Turkey
Pakistan: Muslim clerics incite mob to set century-old Hindu temple on fire
Iran’s Foreign Minister accuses Trump of ‘plot to FABRICATE pretext for war’
Famed Muslim preacher Zakir Naik: ‘A believing woman, she may be ugly, she is far superior to an unbelieving woman’
Craig Considine’s Fantasy Islamic State
Turkey takes charge of NATO’s Very High Readiness Joint Task Force as it confirms Russian arms deal
EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Elon Musk’s Tesla Made Record Deliveries In 2020 Despite Global Car Demand Slump


Tesla announced Saturday that it sold a record 499,550 vehicles worldwide in 2020 amid the COVID-19 pandemic, falling just 450 units behind its target of selling half a million cars that year.
Tesla manufactured 509,737 cars — 54,805 units of Model S/X and 454,932 of Model 3/Y — in 2020, approximately 98% of which were sold, according to a press release from the company. The 499,550 vehicles sold included 442,511 units of Model 3/Y and 57,039 of S/X, the release stated. 
At 2020’s start, Tesla stated it would “comfortably exceed 500,000 units” for the year, a target it didn’t revise despite the pandemic, Reuters reported. In October, Chief Financial Officer Zachary Kirkhorn announced Tesla was “aiming to achieve (its) original 2020 guidance.”
Though Tesla fell short of attaining its ambitious goal of delivering 500,000 vehicles in 2020 by about 0.09%, it exceeded analysts’ expectation of 493,000 deliveries for the year by 6,500 units, or around 1.33%, the Wall Street Journal reported.
The company, in 2020, exceeded its 2019 sales count of approximately 367,500 units, according to the WSJ, which marked 35.9% positive growth.
CEO Elon Musk welcomed the numbers as a “major milestone” on Twitter, saying that during Tesla’s early days, he wasn’t sure the company would make it. 


Despite a decline in global demand for new cars during the COVID-19 pandemic, Tesla’s numbers reached their final levels thanks to a steady rise in electric vehicle adoption, according to Reuters, along the demand for Tesla vehicles in China, WSJ reported.
Tesla’s sales in China, ever since it began delivering cars from its new Shanghai plant in late 2019, helped counteract manufacturing slowdowns in the U.S., where Tesla had to shut its Fremont, California plant for multiple weeks starting March 2020 to comply with local COVID-19 safety restrictions, WSJ reported.
Tesla had also seen its stock rise in value by more than 700% in 2020, according to Reuters.
In the forthcoming months, Tesla faces the “difficult” challenge of introducing new vehicle models and opening additional plants in Germany and Texas, as part of Musk’s expansion plans, WSJ said.
COLUMN BY

ANDREW JOSE

Contributor. Follow Andrew on Twitter.
RELATED ARTICLE: Elon Musk Joins Mass California Exodus, Moves To Texas
EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Reexamining the Proof that Obama’s Birth Certificate is Fake


We met with a source who lived in Hawaii and worked for Hawaii Pacific Health. He was party to the 1978 Kapiolani Hospital and the Kauikeolani Children’s Hospital merger. When these two hospitals merged they became Kapiolani Medical Center for Women & Children.
According to White House archived 1961 birth certificate of former President Barack Hussein Obama he was born in what is now known as the Kapiolani Medical Center for Women & Children.
In an April 9, 2016 article titled “Obama facts don’t add up” the Editors of the Fergus Falls Journal wrote:

Here are four simple questions from a reputable attorney — yes, there are some — that should really get your gray matter churning even if you are an Obama fan. For all you anti-Fox News folks, none of this information came from Fox News. All of it can be verified from legitimate sources — Wikipedia, the Kapiolani Hospital website itself and a good history book.

• Back in 1961 people of color were called negroes. So how can the Obama birth certificate state he is African American when the term wasn’t even used at that time?

• The birth certificate that the White House released lists Obama’s birth as Aug. 4, 1961, and lists Barack Hussein Obama as his father. No big deal, right? At the time of Obama’s birth, it also shows that his father was 25-years-old, and that Obama’s father was born in “Kenya, East Africa.”

This wouldn’t seem like anything of concern, except the fact that Kenya did not even exist until 1963, it was known as the British East Africa Protectorate.

On the birth certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is “Kapi’olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital.” This cannot be, because the hospitals in question in 1961 were called KauiKeolani Children’s Hospital and Kapi’olani Maternity Home, respectively. The name did not change to Kapiolani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals merged. How can this particular name of the hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961 if this name had not yet been applied to it until 1978?

Why hasn’t this been discussed in the major media? [Emphasis added]

According to the Kapiolani Medical Center for Women & Children website:

Concerned about the welfare of Hawaii’s mothers and babies, Queen Kapiolani founded the Kapiolani Maternity Home in 1890. She worked tirelessly traveling the islands holding bazaars, luau and other events and benefits to raise the $8,000 needed. Over the years, the home expanded its services from labor and delivery to providing other health care services for women.
In 1909, Albert and Emma Kauikeolani Wilcox donated the funds to open Kauikeolani Children’s Hospital, a hospital for Hawaii’s children envisioned by Dr. James R. Judd and Sanford Dole. Concerned that two of every seven infants in Hawaii did not live to see their first birthday, the community rallied to match the Wilcox’s gift. In its first full year of operation, the hospital admitted 354 pediatric patients with an average length of stay of 19 days.
In 1978, the Kapiolani Hospital and the Kauikeolani Children’s Hospital merged to become Kapiolani Medical Center for Women & Children.

WATCH THIS VIDEO OF THE HISTORY OF THE KAPUIOLANI CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL:

While there have been some who questioned this claim, my source was there and noticed the discrepancy immediately.
Why is this important today?
Because it appears that Barrack Hussein Obama will be a major influence on the Biden administration, if it comes to power.
©Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

Online Censorship of ‘Transition Skeptics’


Probably one of the deadliest minefields, among all categories of suppressed discourse, is to venture into the topic of transsexuals with anything apart from absolute adherence to the politically correct perspective. Rather than do that, we’d just like to draw attention to the work of 4thWaveNow, a website and Twitter account that bills itself as “youth transition skeptics.”
It took some digging, but it appears that “4th Wave Now” is how the site’s authors assert their embrace of “4th wave feminism,” as opposed to being labeled “TERFs,” which stands for “trans-exclusionary radical feminists.” While most of us on the Right believe identity politics is a massive distraction designed to occupy the minds of people who might otherwise pay attention to things like, oh, say, the loss of American sovereignty or the consolidation of political and economic power by a globalist oligarchy or the increasing irrelevancy of the Bill of Rights, for leftists, identity politics are of paramount importance. And to be fair, in the case of transsexuals, when someone is contemplating a medical procedure as profound as sex reassignment, how they define their “identity” is indeed consequential.
But that’s the point of this brave website, operated by an avowed leftist, who has had their Twitter account repeatedly censored, and was banned from Medium, for straying ever so slightly from the agenda of mainstream transsexual approved thought. Or as they put it: “A community of people who question the medicalization of gender-atypical youth.”
In plain English – and this will undoubtedly get some nuance wrong – this website is providing a forum for people who question the prevailing medical bias towards rapid diagnosis of young children not only with gender dysphoria, but also towards irreversible medical treatments designed to “confirm” the new sex of the patient.
This website probably would be censored more if they posted more often and had more visitors. Consider the price paid by other dutiful leftists such as JK Rowling, who by merely questioning the approved narrative of the transsexual community has been dubbed an “aggressive biological essentialist” along with the more intelligible stigma, “transphobe.” JK Rowling is going to be harassed for the rest of her life.
In the context of free speech and online censorship, which is the point of including 4thWaveNow in the Winston84 directory, one must reflect on how slight their violations were to nonetheless invite such a heavy response from Twitter. Trans activism, like so much on the Left, is intolerant in the extreme, and yet it informs the censorship policies of the major online platforms.
EDITORS NOTE: This Winson84 Project column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

VIDEO: The Vortex — Class Warfare. It’s going to ramp up in 2021!



TRANSCRIPT
Church Militant (a 501(c)4 corporation) is responsible for the content of this commentary.
Happy Feast Day of Mary, Mother of God. And as we move into this no-so-shiny new year, Her children are going to be depending on Her more than ever.
What the commies have done in America is what they’ve managed to do everywhere their presence has fouled the planet. They’ve created a war between the classes, but in this case, it’s getting really bad.
What we see unfolding before us is a system where the elites oppress the peasants — and yes, this includes the hierarchy over the faithful.
The cultural elites are — in no particular order — the media, government, Hollywood, Silicon Valley and corporate America. Expand that traditional pool and toss in the U.S. hierarchy because, well, birds of a feather.
What the elites all have in common is one simple principle: They are better than the peasants. Therefore, everything they pronounce is automatically correct and people must obey.
Let’s take that principle and apply it across the board and see just how true it is:

  • The media: Whatever they tell you is true, and if your dare challenge the narrative — you smelly, unwashed peasant — you are an ignorant, gun-loving, homophobe, racist, white supremacist.
  • The government: They pass the laws, jack up your taxes, ignore the pleas of the little man and pay for all of it with your money, you stinking peasant.
  • Hollywood: The entertainment industry is populated with perverts, child sex traffickers and rapists. Then they take their private lives and put them on giant screens and demand you accept it all as normal, you ignorant, puritanical peasant.
  • Silicon Valley: Giant Tech is about free speech unless you speak the truth. They are the ones who fact-check you and decide “truth,” you dangerous revolutionary peasant.
  • Corporate America: If you want to do business with us, in any form, you will accept our embrace of gay sex, the employees will not object, and you will take the diversity training classes and you’ll like it, you defiant peasant.

So, carrying the principle into the hierarchy … You will pay us with your donations. But we will close your parishes; deny you authentic teaching; give you gay clergy and liturgical abuses; order you to wear masks, receive in the hand, make a reservation for Mass and stand miles away from each other. And you’ll do it, you disobedient peasant.
What ties them all together is the double standard they all wield in their own favor but to clamp down on and crush you.
Whether it’s the phony face mask mandate, eating out at restaurants, promotion of child sex trafficking, canceling out your vote by election fraud, of refusing you access to the sacraments, the elites clearly understand that you are on earth to serve them, not the other way around.
It’s class warfare, and what most of the peasants don’t understand is this: The “comforts” of life they’ve enjoyed up to now have been little else than a narcotic — something to deaden the intellects and excite the passions — so you don’t pay attention to them installing themselves as monarchs.
Once they have locked down that power — which they are pretty darn close to securing — you can expect the disappearance of the so-called middle class. This happened in the Soviet Union as well as China, Venezuela, Cuba and everywhere else on the planet. The middle class is a testament to the ingenuity and creativity of man and, well, we can’t have that now, can we?
Likewise, in the Church, how dare you ask for financial transparency. It’s frankly none of your business how much of your money we use for attorneys, erratic catechesis or gay sleepovers at the seminary.
We are the only ones — the hierarchy — who get to speak of “clericalism” — because we know that we don’t really mean what we are saying, so don’t get any ideas about becoming uppity laity — using our own empty platitudes against us.
Another striking parallel between the episcopal elites and the cultural elites is the constant appeal to superiority of being “college-educated.” In politics, you hear it all the time: “Oh, the college-educated would never vote that way — only those dumb hicks, the commoners, the working class deprived of a college education would vote that way.”
You get this exact same attitude in the Church if you’ve ever run into the lesbian in charge at the chancery. Oh, you’ll have to confer with Sister Perpetua Bull Dyke. She has a Ph.D. in liturgy and she says adoration is forbidden. Her office is just down the hall, and she’s the one with the man’s haircut — and build.
Remember, the elites are the ones who want to defund the police for you but hire private security for themselves with your money. The episcopal elites are the same ones who want your weekly money for the parish, but not actually not you in the pews.
Unchallenged, this will result in full-on communism within a generation, as the next generation will be “educated” to believe this is just how things are. In fact, that has already begun.
On the political side, Trump was or is the antidote to all this, which is why the landslide election in his favor had to be stolen. But in the Church, no champion has emerged, nor is there likely to be one any time soon — at least not in the natural order.
There are no conditions in place for the rise of a Catholic “Trump.” The Church doesn’t work like that. It’s neither a democracy nor a republic. It’s a hierarchy. And once the hierarchy has become corrupt as hell, as this one has, there is little option but to hunker down and live out the faith in small communities.
That doesn’t mean that the evil should not be challenged, exposed and the wicked perverts not exposed to the broad light of day, but it does mean the motive cannot be an overthrow of institution.
In America, the government belongs to the people, and they can revolt against it and overthrow when they see fit. But Catholics can’t do that in the Church because we know that the Church doesn’t belong to the hierarchy. They have proven themselves to be little else than spiritually murderous hirelings, and God will be their judge, jury and executioner — for eternity.
So faithful Catholics who are also American patriots are going to have to live out this kind of schizophrenic reality — fighting the enemies of Christ outside of the Church one way, while battling the enemies of Christ inside the Church in another. But both need fighting.
After all, fighting and rebelling against injustice is what peasants do. And remember, we didn’t ask for this class warfare; it was brought to us by the elites in the Church as well as outside the Church.
EDITORS NOTE: This Church Militant video is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

VIDEO: Modern Anti-Semitism — Israelophobia


TheJerusalemCenter posted the below video to help understand anti-Semitism today. Thanks to SK for sending this to us.
Please watch this short but straight to the point video titled “Conspiracies’, Jews and the Jewish State“:

©TheJerusalemCenter. All rights reserved.

Gohmert Says Over 140 Members Of Congress Will Object To Biden’s Electors On January 6


Republican Texas Rep. Louie Gohmert said over 140 members of Congress will object during Congress’s counting of the Electoral College vote on Jan. 6.
Gohmert and a group of other GOP figures filed a brief Friday in a Texas court against Vice President Mike Pence in an effort to overturn the 2020 presidential election. The lawsuit focuses on Pence, who will oversee the upcoming Jan. 6 meeting of Congress to count states’ electoral votes and finalize President-elect Joe Biden’s victory over President Donald Trump.
In the brief, Gohmert claims there are 140 members of Congress who will object during the Jan. 6 meeting of Congress.


READ THE FULL COURT FILING HERE: 
Gohmert Court Filing by Henry Rodgers on Scribd

Republican Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley became the first Senator to say he will object during Congress’s counting of the Electoral College vote on Jan. 6, in a statement released Wednesday. (RELATED: Sen. Josh Hawley To Object Electoral College Certification Process On January 6)
Republican Alabama Republican Rep. Mo Brooks and a group of House Republicans said they will try to overturn the results of the presidential election on Jan. 6 by objecting, with Hawley’s support there will now likely be a vote on the issue, The Hill reported.
Gohmert and the group filed the lawsuit against Pence in his capacity as vice president in a federal Texas court Sunday. The lawsuit reportedly asks for the judge to overturn Trump’s losses in battleground states.
Along with Gohmert and Arizona Republican Party Chairwoman Kelli Ward, Students for Trump COO Tyler Bowyer, Arizona Republican Party Executive Director Greg Safsten and Maricopa County Republicans Second Vice Chair Nancy Cottle are asking federal Judge Jeremy Kernodle to let Pence declare who the electors are on Jan. 6, according to The Daily Beast.
COLUMN BY

HENRY RODGERS

Senior Congressional correspondent. Follow Henry Rodgers On Twitter
RELATED VIDEO: Leigh Dundas – Election update, December 29th, 2020

RELATED ARTICLES:
Rep. Louie Gohmert, Group Of Republicans Sue Pence In Last-Ditch Effort To Overturn Presidential Election
‘We Need New Leadership’ — Ocasio-Cortez Blasts Pelosi, Schumer
EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

VIDEO: Governor Noem Says South Dakota Has ‘Perhaps The Strongest Economy’ in Country After Refusing Lockdowns


South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem’s response to the global pandemic has been superb. She rightfully refused to shut down her state despite ridicule from the Left. Today, South Dakota’s economy is red hot. As such, American’s are moving to South Dakota in droves. Like Governor DeSantis, Governor Noem will be a force in the 2024 Republican primaries.

Governor Says South Dakota Has “Perhaps The Strongest Economy” in Country After Refusing Lockdowns

By: Dan Bongino Show, January 1, 2020
Despite the fact that lockdowns do enormous amounts of economic damage, they’ve proven to be almost completely ineffective at stopping the coronavirus.
One of the governors that understood this early on was South Dakota’s Kristi Noem. Noem was savagely criticized by liberals that pointed to the tiny state’s high rate of infection as evidence that she needed to shut everything down. However the state has only had a grand total of 1488 coronavirus-related deaths and yesterday, they had a mere 444 new cases. Meanwhile, unlike many liberal states that aggressively shut down their businesses, South Dakota’s economy hasn’t been decimated this year.

The national unemployment rate is 6.7% and states like New York and California that have heavily relied on lockdowns to control the coronavirus have unemployment rates over 8%. As you may have heard, people and businesses are fleeing both of those states. So, how is South Dakota doing on that front? It looks like they’re doing pretty well.

How much of the economic misery we’ve seen this year was caused by the coronavirus and how much of it was actually caused by the overreaction of state governments to the coronavirus? South Dakota’s experience suggests most of the economic damage we saw this year was self-inflicted. That doesn’t mean the coronavirus isn’t serious and it doesn’t mean that we all shouldn’t take steps to avoid getting it. However, is it worth economically crushing a lot of small businesses and impoverishing so many people for lockdowns that don’t even seem to work? Some of us were asking that question months ago and South Dakota’s experience seems to suggest that we were on the right track.

RELATED ARTICLE: BREAKING: Three Arrested for Brutal Beating and Torture of Former GOP Senate Candidate
EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Far-Left Rioters VANDALIZE One Of Pelosi’s San Francisco Homes With Blood-Red Paint


Democrats like Pelosi will learn sooner or later: you cannot appease the violent left.

Democrat House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s San Francisco home is VANDALIZED with red paint, a pig’s head and a spray-painted message about $2,000 checks during battle with Republicans over direct payments

  • Police sources told TMZ that cops were called out to reports of vandalism at the House Speaker’s property around 3 a.m. New Year’s Day
  • DailyMail.com has contacted San Francisco Police Department for comment
  • A photo posted on social media shows a white garage plastered in graffiti
  • ‘2k’ is written on the garage and then crossed out, in what appears to be a reference to the $2,000 stimulus checks Pelosi is pushing for
  • The graffiti also reads ‘cancel rent’ and ‘we want everything’
  • Red paint covers the driveway and a pig’s head sits on the paving slabs

By Rachel Sharp For Dailymail.com, 1 January 2021 |
Nancy Pelosi’s San Francisco home was vandalized overnight with a pig’s head surrounded in a pool of red paint, as well as a spray-painted message appearing to allude to the failed $2,000 stimulus checks.
Police were called to the House Speaker’s Pacific Heights mansion in the early hours of New Year’s Day after receiving reports of vandalism at the property, TMZ reported.
Officers arrived at the scene around 3am and filed a police report, but it is unclear if there are any suspects.
DailyMail.com has reached out to the San Francisco Police Department for comment.
A photo of the bizarre scene was first shared on social media on Friday afternoon by conservative filmmaker Maggie VandenBerghe.
Nancy Pelosi ‘s San Francisco home has been vandalized with red paint, a pigs head and a spray painted message about $2,000 checks, according to TMZ
Police sources told the outlet that cops were called out to reports of vandalism at the House Speaker’s property in the early hours of New Year’s Day. Her home as it normally looks above
Photos of the bizarre scene were shared on social media by conservative filmmaker Maggie VandenBerghe on Friday afternoon

Photos of the bizarre scene were shared on social media by conservative filmmaker Maggie VandenBerghe on Friday afternoon
It showed Pelosi’s white garage door defaced with black graffiti text reading: ‘$2k cancel rent! We want everything!’ in an apparent reference to the $2,000 COVID relief checks she has been pushing for.
The vandals also spray-painted the letter A enclosed in a circle, most commonly known as the symbol for anarchism.
Underneath the disturbing message was pool of red paint on the driveway with a pig’s head placed at the center of the pavement.
VandenBerghe, a self-proclaimed patriot and independent journalist that has been featured on conservative news outlets in the past, accused police in her post of trying to cover up the incident after the city reported the vandalism.
‘City called to clean up at 3am & police attempting to stop photos of scene. Media SILENT,’ she tweeted.
Pelosi has been calling for the second round of stimulus checks to be increased from $600 to $2,000 – an amount also proposed by Donald Trump.
But the efforts have so far fallen short with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell on Wednesday blocking the Democrats’ standalone bill to send the checks to Americans.
McConnell told Pelosi the Senate won’t be ‘bullied’ into passing it, dashing hopes of the higher checks being sent out to Americans.

RELATED ARTICLE: ‘Nero’ De Blasio Dances in Times Square While Banning New Yorkers From Ball Drop
EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Stunning Turn of Events in Pennsylvania May Lead to Trump Victory


January 6th – a day that will change history.

Stunning turn of events in PA may lead to Trump victory

By James Arlandson, The American Thinker, December 31, 2020:
On Dec. 28, Pennsylvania lawmakers concluded that “Numbers Don’t Add Up, Certification Of Presidential Results Premature and In Error.”
President Trump tweeted about it:
Breaking News: In Pennsylvania there were 205,000 more votes than there were voters. This alone flips the state to President Trump.
The key paragraphs from the PA lawmakers’ two-page statement:
A comparison of official county election results to the total number of voters who voted on November 3, 2020 as recorded by the Department of State shows that 6,962,607 total ballots were reported as being cast, while DoS/SURE system records indicate that only 6,760,230 total voters actually voted. Among the 6,962,607 total ballots cast, 6,931,060 total votes were counted in the presidential race, including all three candidates on the ballot and write-in candidates.
The difference of 202,377 more votes cast than voters voting, together with the 31,547 over- and under-votes in the presidential race, adds up to an alarming discrepancy of 170,830 votes, which is more than twice the reported statewide difference between the two major candidates for President of the United States.
On November 24, 2020, Boockvar certified election results, and Wolf issued a certificate of ascertainment of presidential electors, stating that Vice President Joe Biden received 80,555 more votes than President Donald Trump.
The PA lawmakers have done their job (so far). Now what is the next step? These lawmakers need to recall the slate of electors and tell the House and Senate that the election results cannot be ascertained in their state. They should probably hold a vote that overturns the certification of the awful election. The bottom line is that the slate of electors is not permitted to vote on Jan. 6.
This reasonable and fair action may have a domino effect on the other embattled states, whose lawmakers should follow suit. If this happens, Trump will win in the Electoral College. (I had erroneously stated that if no one reaches 270 votes, then the House decides.) Instead, the Twelfth Amendment states: “[T]he votes shall then be counted[.] … The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President[.]”
But will PA’s Legislature, where the real power resides, do this? And will the other embattled states do the same? If so, then Trump (rightly) wins: 232 to 222. This is the best, constitutionally speaking, and probably the only real option remaining for Trump.
Therefore, the solution is, once again, that we the people need to put maximum pressure on the heroic and truthful PA legislators to send word to the House and Senate, reminding them that the legislatures decide things, not a governor or a secretary of state. They should even hold a vote, overturning the certification of the election. And we need to put the same pressure on the legislatures of the other embattled states, where fraud obviously happened, to follow Pennsylvania’s lead.

RELATED ARTICLE: BREAKING: Three Arrested for Brutal Beating and Torture of Former GOP Senate Candidate
EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. All rights reserved.

Across America Car Caravans Forming, Will Arrive in Washington on January 6th! [Video]


UpdateStop the Steal calendar and contacts here.
The Epoch Times has a very informative story about the car caravans organizing in the eastern half of the United States to descend on the Capitol to protest the Election Steal.
At the request of President Trump they will join hundreds of thousands who will arrive by bus, train, or plane in what I’m guessing may be the largest rally for any President ever.
From the Epoch Times:

Car Caravans Forming for ‘Historic’ Protest in Washington

Sixty-year-old Robin, a retail merchandiser in rural Virginia, hasn’t visited the nation’s capital in more than two decades or ever taken part in organizing a political event, although she was quick to volunteer to manage a stop for one of the four vehicle caravans headed to Washington for what many are calling a historic protest on Jan. 6, 2021.
In an unprecedented request, President Donald Trump asked his supporters to travel to Washington for a “big protest” on Jan. 6, when a joint session of Congress will be held, during which lawmakers will vet the Electoral College votes cast three weeks prior.
A number of House Republicans have committed to challenge the slates of electors from six states where the president has disputed the validity of the election’s outcome.

This story was written before news broke yesterday that Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri would support the President in the Senate.
But frankly, we better see Senators Ted Cruz, Mike Lee, Marsha Blackburn, Tom Cotton, Rand Paul and other REPUBLICANS standing up for us as well.

Car Caravans Forming for ‘Historic’ Protest in Washington

Sixty-year-old Robin, a retail merchandiser in rural Virginia, hasn’t visited the nation’s capital in more than two decades or ever taken part in organizing a political event, although she was quick to volunteer to manage a stop for one of the four vehicle caravans headed to Washington for what many are calling a historic protest on Jan. 6, 2021.
In an unprecedented request, President Donald Trump asked his supporters to travel to Washington for a “big protest” on Jan. 6, when a joint session of Congress will be held, during which lawmakers will vet the Electoral College votes cast three weeks prior.
A number of House Republicans have committed to challenge the slates of electors from six states where the president has disputed the validity of the election’s outcome.

This story was written before news broke yesterday that Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri would support the President in the Senate.

But frankly, we better see Senators Ted Cruz, Mike Lee, Marsha Blackburn, Tom Cotton, Rand Paul and other REPUBLICANS standing up for us as well.

“Be there, will be wild!” the president wrote on Twitter on Dec. 19. A week later, he added, “See you in Washington, DC, on January 6th. Don’t miss it. Information to follow!”
A Michigan man who goes by the nickname Dr. ENoCH on Twitter is organizing the larger caravan effort, which encompasses 20 cities along four routes. He told The Epoch Times that considering the size of the two prior post-election Trump events in Washington—which the president didn’t call for or endorse ahead of time—the Jan. 6 event is on pace to become the biggest Trump rally so far.
“There are two things that Trump’s ever asked us to do. One was to vote for him and now, the other one is to be in D.C. on the 6th,” Enoch said. “That’s why I started organizing this.”

Here is info. from DR ENoCH on Twitter:

Continue reading because there is a lot of information in the Epoch Times story about who is organizing and where.  They may ask for your e-mail address before you can read it for free.
If you have a problem, you can get the story here.

What do you do if you can’t travel to Washington?

I know it is hard for most of you to go to Washington, DC on the spur of the moment. But you must find other avenues of activism in this last week.
Start calling all of your elected officials in Washington, your Members of the House and your Senators and tell them you believe the election was stolen. Shut down the phone lines! 
Go to Stop the Steal for contact information and what you might say to your elected officials.
Use social media even if you hate it.  Most Members of the House and Senate have Twitter and Facebook accounts.  Find them and tell them what you think.
They have local offices too, so on Wednesday, rally with as many people as you can round up in front of their local offices, even a few people will make an impact. Take pictures of your protest and post them on whatever social media you have. Get your local newspaper/TV to cover your local protest.
At minimum, watch the events unfold on January 6th on CSPAN, Newsmax, or One America News. History is being made, don’t miss it!
And, when the dust settles, vow to become engaged in supporting a powerful Patriot movement, a MAGA movement, to get rid of anyone in the Washington swamp who was complicit in the great Election Steal of 2020, or who was too chicken to speak up.
Happy New Year!
EDITORS NOTE: This Frauds, Crooks and Criminals column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Beijing Biden vs. America’s Champion: Donald Trump


Let’s be honest about this: We’ve already lost the Republic. You can see this for yourself each time you put on a face mask to leave your home and stand in line 6 feet behind someone else as you wait to enter Safeway or Trader Joe’s or Walmart.
You can see it when you’re denied normal medical service unless you take a Covid-19 test and it comes back negative. If you’re not sick but get a false positive reading, you’re plumb out of luck. They’ll see you in two weeks if, and only if, you test negative—even if you haven’t been sick all this time. Meanwhile, suffer.
Christians can see it every Sunday when they’re locked out of church; Jews can see it every Friday night and Saturday morning when they’re locked out of the synagogue. And no, Zoom meetings where you sit enclosed in your pod and watch your minister, pastor, priest or rabbi on a computer screen or smart-phone doesn’t cut it. Is that how you’d like to take your vacations, sight-seeing in Rome via video? Watching others snorkel and swim in Honolulu? Is this the way you want your Thanksgivings to be, in a computerized video conference room, watching your out-of-town loved ones carve their turkey, waving to you across the ether, to keep you “safe”?
I guarantee you, Italians under Mussolini had it better than this.
The question, then, comes down to this: Can we get our Republic back?
And at least 74 million Americans apparently agree that our only chance of doing so is by ensuring that the real winner of the 2020 election, President Donald J. Trump, is duly installed in office for his second term on January 20, 2021.
Let’s be clear about something else: Joe Biden does not have a transition team, unless by that he means he’s transitioning to an assisted living facility for Alzheimer patients. Nor is he the “President-elect” when no one has elected him. He remains one of two presidential candidates—the one whose backers have apparently perpetrated the biggest vote fraud in our history, as Basement Biden told us himself, in what was either a rare moment of candor and lucidity, or was the Freudian slip of the century. “We have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics.” As they say, even a broken clock is right twice a day.
But it seems we can count on the New York Times to run interference for the biggest crooks, criminals and traitors in America. Here’s how the Paper of Record explains the miraculous ascension of Beijing Biden—with his few pathetic and sparsely attended “rallies”—over the dynamo known as Trump, whose numerous rallies draw 30,000 to 50,000 people, not counting the ones they couldn’t fit into the venues.
Never fear, the Times has the answer: “The Biden Bump.” Seriously? Here’s a quote from The Gray Lady: “If Democrats had nominated any candidate other than Joe Biden, President Trump may well have won re-election.” Ahem, did the Times astute journalists fail to notice that Trump swept this election in such a landslide the cheaters had to move into overdrive to try to stem the red wave?
Allow me to offer another, more apt explanation, with a different tagline: “The Biden Dump”—referring to those truckloads and suitcases full of pristine ballots that were dumped into the vote-counting headquarters in half a dozen swing states and loaded into their dicey machines multiple times. Sleepy Joe was spot on when he boasted about the Dems’ vote fraud enterprise.
We can also almost always count on Mitt Romney to stab Trump in the back: “At some point truth, freedom and democracy have to ascend, and you step aside,” said RINO Romney on November 8th, while the fraud was still proceeding apace.
Lucky for us that upwards of 90 million people voted for Trump—if we factor in the percentage of votes the Dems tore up or stole on the Dominion machines—and there’s every possibility we’ll soon witness the rightful winner of this election being inaugurated for his second term. I, for one, can’t wait to see what Melania will wear.
© Cherie Zaslawsky. All rights reserved.
RELATED TWEET: