GERMANY: Molecular Biologist Unveils Concept of World’s First Artificial Womb Facility Which Can Incubate up to 30,000 Lab-Grown Babies a Year thumbnail

GERMANY: Molecular Biologist Unveils Concept of World’s First Artificial Womb Facility Which Can Incubate up to 30,000 Lab-Grown Babies a Year

By The Geller Report

From a world that wants abortion, what are they up to?

“Lab-grown babies.” Cloning?

Cloning? The Matrix 2022?

German Molecular Biologist Unveils Concept of World’s First Artificial Womb Facility Which Can Incubate up to 30,000 Lab-Grown Babies a Year (VIDEO)

By Jim Hof,: TPG, December 12, 2022:

On Friday, a German molecular biologist by trade unveiled a new concept for the world’s first artificial womb facility, EctoLife, which could incubate up to 30,000 babies a year.

“My new concept will be unveiled early December, something that I have been working on for a while,” said Hashem Al-Ghaili in November. “The new concept relies on over 50 years of groundbreaking scientific research.”

Hashem Al-Ghaili is a molecular biologist, producer, filmmaker, and science communicator based in Berlin, Germany.

EctoLife, which operates solely on renewable energy, enables infertile couples to conceive and become the biological parents of their own offspring.

“It’s a perfect solution for women who had their uterus surgically removed due to cancer or other complications. With EctoLife, premature births and C-sections will be a thing of the past. EctoLife is designed to help countries that are suffering from severe population decline, including Japan, Bulgaria, South Korea, and many others,” according to its press release.

“According to the World Health Organization, around 300,000 women die from pregnancy complications. EctoLife artificial womb is designed to alleviate human suffering and reduce the chances of C-sections,” Hashem wrote.

Warning: Graphic Content!

According to the World Health Organization, around 300,000 women die from pregnancy complications. EctoLife artificial womb is designed to alleviate human suffering and reduce the chances of C-sections.

— Hashem Al-Ghaili (@HashemGhaili) December 9, 2022

In an interview with Science and Stuff, Al-Ghaili revealed that he believes the EctoLife concept would replace natural birth in the future.

A total of 75 fully functional laboratories can be found within the building, according to the press release. Up to four hundred artificial wombs, or “growth pods,” can be housed in each cutting-edge laboratory. Every pod is made to be just like the conditions inside the mother’s uterus.

Keep reading……

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

RELATED ARTICLE: New Zealand Officials Take Baby from Parents for Requesting Blood Transfusion from Unvaccinated Person

RELATED TWEET:

Matrix much? 🤷 https://t.co/U1p1t0B1J1

— ThēPrìcklyThìstle (@zenjentree) December 12, 2022

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Twitter Still Has MANY Ex-FBI/CIA Agents in High Ranking Positions thumbnail

Twitter Still Has MANY Ex-FBI/CIA Agents in High Ranking Positions

By The Geller Report

“Why, after Trump was elected, did Twitter hire over a dozen ex FBI/CIA agents and place them in Senior Management roles?”


It gets more sinister by the day. We thought we knew, we knew nothing.

Not just the FBI, almost the entire intelligence community has been/still working from within social media platforms to keep tabs on users and suppress pieces of information from being accessed and shared. DIG DEEPER! #TwitterFiles2 https://t.co/mlL7yxjYDy pic.twitter.com/2CMpIHx3yp

— ꪑꫀꪑ᭢ꪮ᭢ ×͜× (@MemnonX) December 7, 2022

Read this thread:

Elon Musk, Your new company @Twitter has many ex FBI/CIA agents in high ranks. Should probably do a little housecleaning.

    1. Kevin Michelena – current Twitter Sr. Corporate Security Analyst. Ex FBI Intelligence Analyst 12 years
    2. Doug Hunt – current Twitter Senior Director. Ex FBI Special Agent 20 years.
    3. Mark Jaroszewski – current Twitter Director Corporate Security/Risk. Ex FBI 20 years
    4. Douglas Turner – current Twitter Senior Manager, Corporate and Executive Security Services. Ex FBI 14 years. Ex Secret Service 7 years.
    5. Patrick G. – current Twitter Head of Corporate Security. Ex FBI Special Agent 23 years.
    6. Karen Walsh – current Twitter Director – Corporate Resilience. Ex FBI Special Agent 21 years 
    7. Russell Handorf – current Twitter Senior Staff Technical Program Manager. Ex FBI 10 years.
    8. Michael B. – current Twitter Senior Corporate Security Manager. Ex FBI 23 years.
    9. Vincent Lucero – current Twitter Senior Security Manager. Ex FBI Special Agent 22 years.
    10. Kevin L. – current Twitter Corporate Security Manager. Ex FBI Special Agent 25 years.
    11. Matthew W. – current Twitter Senior Director of Product Trust, Revenue Policy, and Counsel Systems & Analytics. Ex FBI 15 years.
    12. Claire O. – current Twitter Senior Corporate Security Analyst. Ex FBI 8 years.
    13. Bruce A. – current Twitter Director, Corporate Security. Ex FBI 23 years.
    14. Jeff Carlton – current Twitter Senior Manager. Ex FBI & CIA Intelligence Analyst 3 years.

    What do all of these Twitter employees have in common? They were ALL hired since @realDonaldTrump was elected.

    Why, after Trump was elected, did Twitter hire over a dozen ex FBI/CIA agents and place them in Senior Management roles? 

    @elonmusk – how many “Jim Bakers” are imbedded in Twitter, possibly working against you? or…..”watching” you. I’d advise you to do some investigating and clean house. 

    AUTHOR

    Pamela Geller

    RELATED ARTICLES:

    ‘Zuckerbucks’ Back in Business for 2024

    Elon Musk Invites Banned Stanford Professor to Twitter Headquarters

    Twitter Files Part 4: Platform Changed Policy Specifically To Ban ‘Trump Alone’ “Election Squad” Tasked With Rigging Election

    EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

How Migrants Make The Economies They Move To A Lot Like The Ones They Left thumbnail

How Migrants Make The Economies They Move To A Lot Like The Ones They Left

By Jihad Watch

Ponder the implications of this for mass Muslim migration into Europe. And those implications are by no means solely economic.

by Charles Fain Lehman, Washington Free Beacon, December 11, 2022:

Imagine that you are a U.S. immigration officer, handing out green cards to the would-be Americans of the world. You have before you two applicants who look almost completely the same; for some arcane, unspecified bureaucratic reason, you can only approve one of them. They’re both well-educated by American standards, both bringing identical families, both passed their background checks.

The major difference is their nation of origin. One is from a nation with a strong tradition of rule of law, free markets, and democratic pluralism. The other is from a country where kleptocracy, autocracy, and socialism are standard. The difference, in other words, is the character of the society that your two would-be immigrants come from. The question is: Should this difference matter?

The basic argument of The Culture Transplant, the new book from George Mason University professor Garett Jones, is that at least in the aggregate, the answer to this question is “yes.” The marginal immigrant, to be sure, may not matter. But Jones shows, through an engaging and digestible tour of the academic literature, that people bring their national character with them when they migrate; that those values persist for up to several generations; and that some values really are better for societal flourishing than others, so the values immigrants bring matters a great deal.

To reach this conclusion, Jones relies on a fairly diverse set of evidence. Much of the basis for his argument, though, is drawn from the so-called deep-roots literature. That research, in essence, looks at what today’s countries were like 500 to 2,500 years ago, in terms of level of governance, agricultural development, and technological development. It observes that what a country was like hundreds of years ago is a strong predictor of how developed it is today. More to Jones’s point, it observes that what a country’s people were like hundreds of years ago predicts what they are like today.

The point here is that, for whatever reason, certain fundamental facts about a civilization—i.e., its level of development—are both highly relevant to its performance on the centuries timespan and transplantable from one place to another. One plausible explanation is that whatever determines this outcome inheres in the people from those civilizations, who carry it with them and “transplant” it wherever they migrate.

Indeed, Jones reviews extensive research that shows immigrants often look more like their ancestors than the countries they arrive to, even several generations after arrival. If your ancestors believed in things conducive to development—social trust, cooperation, fairness, etc.—then you probably do too. And those beliefs matter for how the country you now live in does.

What are the concrete implications of this view? Jones offers two. One is that the countries with the highest rates of innovation—China, France, Germany, Japan, South Korea, the United Kingdom, and the United States—should be extremely cautious about changing the population composition through migration. These countries produce the overwhelming majority of the world’s progress, and if progress is a function of your country’s composition, then we should care a lot about keeping their current mix, because otherwise all of humanity loses out….

Read more.

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Twitter’s Safety Team Found Trump’s Final Tweets Did Not Violate Policy, But He Was Banned Anyway thumbnail

Twitter’s Safety Team Found Trump’s Final Tweets Did Not Violate Policy, But He Was Banned Anyway

By The Daily Caller

Twitter’s safety team initially found that then-President Donald Trump’s final pair of tweets before his Jan. 8, 2021, ban were not in violation of the company’s rules, according to internal messages published by journalist Bari Weiss Monday, obtained as part of Elon Musk’s ongoing “Twitter Files.”

In the first, Trump praised the “great American Patriots who voted for me,” saying that they would “not be disrespected or treated unfairly in any way shape or form!!!,” while the second read in its entirety: “To all those who have asked, I will not be going to the Inauguration on January 20th.” Several members of Twitter’s safety team agreed that the first did not contain what policy official Anika Navaroli described as “clear or coded incitement,” while the safety team concluded that the second was a “clear no vio,” in the words of one unidentified staffer, using shorthand for “violation,” according to Weiss.

“I think we’d have a hard time saying this is incitement,” wrote one staffer, whose name was redacted, according to Weiss. “It’s pretty clear he’s saying the ‘American Patriots’ are the ones who voted for him and not the terrorists (we can call them that, right?) from Wednesday.”

14. Another staffer agreed: “Don’t see the incitement angle here.” pic.twitter.com/6mbUU2Tma0

— Bari Weiss (@bariweiss) December 12, 2022

However, roughly 90 minutes later, former head of legal, policy and trust Vijaya Gadde, argued that while the first tweet was not “a rule violation on its face,” it could possibly have been posted “as coded incitement to further violence,” Weiss reported.

Twitter would eventually ban Trump for the two tweets, issuing the public justification that they had the potential to “inspire others to replicate the violent acts that took place on January 6, 2021,” because they presented the inauguration as a safe target for a potential attack, since Trump would not be present, and encouraged a disorderly transition of power to the Biden administration by stressing that his voters would not be disrespected.

AUTHOR

JOHN HUGH DEMASTRI

Contributor.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Months Before Elon Musk Fired Her, Twitter Exec Advised Secretive DHS Agency Engaging In ‘Censorship’

Twitter Still Has MANY ex FBI/CIA Agents in High Ranking Positions

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved. All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

COVID Rush, Gold Rush thumbnail

COVID Rush, Gold Rush

By The Daily Skirmish – Liberato.US

Title 42 COVID restrictions at the border are expected to end next Wednesday and it’s shaping up to be a disaster.   Up to 14,000 illegal aliens a day are expected to rush the border.  This is on top of a record number of apprehensions and known gotaways at the border in November – over 300,000 combined.

Numbers alone don’t tell the whole story.  The burden on the border states is so great, they’re taking action on their own.  Arizona’s lame-duck Republican Governor is building a wall at the U.S.-Mexico border with shipping containers.  Texas Governor Greg Abbott declared an invasion and sent National Guard troops and armored personnel carriers to the border in anticipation of COVID restrictions being lifted.  The troops have experienced 267 suspicious or violent events, including gunfire from across the border and physical assaults.

Meanwhile, the number of illegal border-crossers on the terrorist watchlist is skyrocketing.  Nine were caught in October alone, a faster pace than the 98 caught in the fiscal year before that, and up exponentially from the 14 apprehended in the previous fiscal year.  A Muslim-only transit shelter opened across the border from San Diego, recently.  The shelter operator screens occupants a bit for ties to terrorism and has rejected two.  The operator is willing to provide more information to U.S. authorities, but they’ve never called.  The operator also says the shelter’s vetting is incomplete and it’s certainly possible for terrorists to slip through.

Biden’s border policies are raising other national security concerns, as well.  The air marshals warn that diverting them to border ground duties increases the likelihood of another 9/11 attack.  There was an attempt to breach a cockpit, recently, but the Biden administration isn’t answering the phone on this one, either.

That’s because the Biden administration has the pedal to the metal to pack the country with as many illegal aliens as possible before somebody puts a stop to it.  I’ve told you in previous commentaries about dozens of Biden administration policies opening the border and today I add some more.

ICE agents are being told to limit their arrests to illegal aliens with Class A felonies like murder to free up detention bed space for the anticipated influx of new arrivals when COVID restrictions end.  But the number of criminal alien arrests was already down, 71 percent from a comparable period under Trump.  Removals are down by two-thirds under Biden policy.   To add insult to injury, our government is lying to us.  The ICE website says there are 266 illegal aliens who have been released into the U.S. interior without any electronic monitoring through ankle bracelets or cell phones.  But an ICE document distributed at an event last month shows the number is not 266; it’s almost 50,000.

The fallout from Biden’s border policies continues to mount.  An HHS whistleblower said the government is promoting sex trafficking, threatening alien children with deportation if they don’t comply.  The whistleblower also said the government’s child sponsor program is so bad many alien children are being forced into indentured servitude.

The only explanation we’ve ever gotten out of Biden administration officials for all this insanity is that they want to open the borders to increase diversity in the country.   That would be pretty stupid, but recent stories make you wonder if it’s not just all about the money.  There are at least 30 nominally private organizations involved in processing illegal aliens, taxpayer-funded government contractors with friends in high places and a revolving door between government agencies and their executive suites.  Contracts can run into the billions of dollars.  Hunter Biden had an 8 percent stake in a digital banking and remittances platform for illegal aliens.  Which begs the question: did 10 percent go to the Big Guy?  Is the Big Guy selling his office?  Is the Big Guy above lining his own pockets, the fate of the country be damned?  The Biden administration has never adequately explained why it’s opening the border, so I will assume the worst.  Somebody should take a closer look at the money that’s being made in all this.

©Christopher Wright. All rights reserved.

Visit The Daily Skirmish and Watch Eagle Headline News – 7:30am ET Weekdays

Court Permanently Blocks Biden Administration’s Transgender Mandate thumbnail

Court Permanently Blocks Biden Administration’s Transgender Mandate

By The Geller Report

A reprieve from the most depraved regime since Caligula……

As one commenter points out, “This mandate is from 2016 in the Obama ACA. So it took 6+ years and countless harm to children and young adults for the courts fix this abhorrent mandate. This is an Obama-Biden sick perverse action.”

Court Permanently Blocks Biden Administration’s Transgender Mandate

By: The Epoch Times, December 10, 2022:

A federal appeals court has permanently blocked the Biden administration’s bid to force doctors and insurers to perform or pay for gender-transition procedures even if they object on grounds of conscience and medical judgment, with the court basing its decision on constitutional protections of religious freedom.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit issued a unanimous ruling (pdf) on Dec. 9 blocking the controversial U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) transgender mandate.

Issued in 2016, the mandate interpreted the Affordable Care Act in a way that required doctors to perform gender-transition procedures on any patient, including children, even if the doctor was convinced the procedure could harm the patient.

Controversial Mandate

The mandate also required the vast majority of private insurance companies and many employers to cover the costs of gender-transition therapy or face penalties.

The HHS’s own panel of medical experts acknowledged that gender-transition procedures can be harmful and in many cases not medically justified, with HHS determining that Medicare and Medicaid should not be forced to cover such procedures.

Research has shown that gender-transition procedures carry significant risk for children, including loss of bone density, heart disease, and cancer.

‘Do No Harm’

Religious organizations and states sued to block the mandate, with the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty and the North Dakota Attorney General’s office representing some of the groups.

“The federal government has no business forcing doctors to violate their consciences or perform controversial procedures that could permanently harm their patients,” Luke Goodrich, vice president and senior counsel at Becket, said in a statement.

“This is a common-sense ruling that protects patients, aligns with best medical practice, and ensures doctors can follow their Hippocratic Oath to ‘do no harm,’” he added.

Becket filed the lawsuit in 2016 on behalf of a coalition of Catholic hospitals, a Catholic university, and Catholic nuns who run health clinics for the poor.

A federal district court blocked the mandate from taking effect, leading the Biden administration to appeal the case to the 8th Circuit, which in its Dec. 8 ruling concluded that the lower court “correctly held that ‘intrusion upon the Catholic Plaintiff’s exercise of religion’” justified a permanent injunction.

The Biden administration has 90 days to appeal the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court or 45 days to ask the 8th Circuit court to rehear the case.

There was no immediate reaction from the White House to the ruling.

Goodrich said in a call with reporters that he doubts the “Biden administration will pursue either of these avenues.”

The case is Religious Sisters of Mercy v. Becerra, case No. 21-1890.

Keep reading…..

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

RELATED ARTICLE: VIDEO: The “Merchant of Death” We Traded Loves America More Than Brittney Griner Does

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

AZ Whistleblower: Chain Of Custody For OVER 298,942 Maricopa County Ballots Delivered To Runbeck On Election Day Did Not Exist thumbnail

AZ Whistleblower: Chain Of Custody For OVER 298,942 Maricopa County Ballots Delivered To Runbeck On Election Day Did Not Exist

By The Geller Report

Arizona Employees Allowed To Add Family Members’ Ballots Without Any Documentation.

By Jordan Conradson, The Gateway Pundit, December 10, 2022:

Never in US history has there been so much evidence compiled of a fraudulent election taking place.

The brave attorneys representing Kari Lake are HEROES who deserve a Medal of Freedom.

Read the full complaint below:

Kari Lake Files Election Challenge in Arizona Court

“Maricopa County election officials engaged in numerous breaches of Arizona election law in their handling and custody of ballots, making it impossible to conclude that the vote tallies reported by Maricopa County accurately reflect the votes cast by Arizona voters,” contends the lawsuit.

Kari Lake’s team of expert attorneys have gathered evidence from signed witness testimony, Runbeck whistleblowers, and Maricopa County whistleblowers to craft a 70-page lawsuit against Maricopa County and Secretary of State Katie Hobbs.

Included in the complaint is a shocking claim by a Runbeck employee that nearly 300,000 ballots were delivered to Runbeck on Election Day with no chain of custody documentation.

Maricopa County is the only jurisdiction in the country that picks up completed ballots at USPS Processing Distribution Center but doesn’t bring them back to the election department or tabulation center. Instead, Maricopa County picks up mail-in ballots and takes them directly to its print vendor Runbeck Election Services, which is headquartered in Phoenix.

The Gateway Pundit has reported on Runbeck’s services in Maricopa County. The County has still not provided all chain of custody documents from Runbeck and USPS for the 2020 election.

The scanning of ballot envelopes takes place behind closed doors and apparently with no documentation.

According to Kari Lake’s lawsuit contesting the 2022 election, a Runbeck employee stated that “Runbeck received 298,942 ballots on Election Day, which includes the EV ballots. The required chain of custody for these ballots does not exist.”

Maricopa County also asked Runbeck how many ballots were received on election night, demonstrating that they did not even know how many ballots were in Runbeck’s custody.

[…]

The Runbeck employee also revealed that 9,530 duplicate ballots were transported without any chain of custody documentation. “They were simply handed over to the delivery driver,” states the lawsuit.

Additionally, Employees of Runbeck were allowed to add their own ballots and family members’ ballots to the batches without chain of custody documentation.

All of these ballots were illegally cast and counted.

The complaint states, “There is no way to know whether 50 ballots or 50,000 ballots were unlawfully added into the election in this way. The Runbeck facility is not a legal ballot drop off site… Given this blatant violation of Arizona law, there is no way to tell the number of ballots that were illegally injected into the 2022 election.”

From Kari Lake’s historic lawsuit:

Illegal Ballot Handling and Chain of Custody Failures with Respect To Over 300,000 Ballots Make The Outcome of the Election Uncertain

Maricopa County election officials engaged in numerous breaches of Arizona election law in their handling and custody of ballots, making it impossible to conclude that the vote tallies reported by Maricopa County accurately reflect the votes cast by Arizona voters.

Arizona law requires that “[t]he county recorder or other officer in charge of elections shall maintain records that record the chain of custody for all election equipment and ballots during early voting through the completion of provisional voting tabulation.” Stat. § 16-621(E) (emphasis added). See also Arizona Elections Procedures Manual 61-61.

A proper chain of custody is not ministerial. The U.S. Election Assistance Commission instructs that “Chain of custody is essential to a transparent and trustworthy election.”[1] “Chain of custody documents provide evidence that can be used to authenticate election results, corroborate post-election tabulation audits, and demonstrate that election outcomes can be trusted.” at 3.

R.S. § 16-452(C) states, “A person who violates any rule adopted pursuant to this section is guilty of a class 2 misdemeanor.” This criminal penalty underscores the Arizona state legislature’s recognition of the critical nature of expressly following chain of custody requirements with respect to ballots. See also A.R.S. § 16-1016(7), (8).

The Arizona Elections Procedure Manual, pages 61-62, establishes required procedures for secure ballot retrieval and chain of custody for all drop box ballots. The requirements include that each county must confirm receipt of the retrieved ballots by signing the retrieval form and indicating the date and time of receipt on the form. The retrieval form must be attached to the outside of the transport container or maintained in a way that ensures the form is traceable to the respective ballot container. Significantly, when the secure transport container is opened by the county recorder, “the number of ballots inside the container shall be counted and noted on the retrieval form.”

Maricopa County election officials received two categories of early voting ballots on Election Day, EV ballots received at ballot drop-off sites and mail-in ballots returned through the U.S. Postal Service. Maricopa County delivered these ballots to Runbeck to obtain electronic images of the signatures on the ballots. After scanning, the ballots were eventually transferred back to the Maricopa County Tabulation and Election Center.

Maricopa County failed to maintain and document the required secure chain of custody for hundreds of thousands of ballots, in violation of Arizona law, including as described below, for over 298,942 ballots delivered to Runbeck on Election Day.

A Runbeck employee observed that Maricopa County election workers delivered Early-Vote (“EV”) ballots retrieved from ballot drop boxes and mail-in ballots from the Postal Service, neither of which were accompanied by any of the required chain of custody paperwork which, among other things, would document the number of ballots received from ballot drop boxes. According to the employee, Runbeck received 298,942 ballots on Election Day which includes the EV ballots. The required chain of custody for these ballots does not exist. Indeed, two days later, on November 10, 2022, the employee observed that Maricopa County had to ask Runbeck how many ballots Runbeck had received on election night, demonstrating that Maricopa County itself did not know how many EV ballots had been retrieved from ballot drop boxes on Election Day in violation of Arizona law.[2]

The Runbeck employee’s testimony is confirmed by Maricopa County’s response to a public records request for chain of custody forms. Early Voting Ballot Transport Statements were produced by Maricopa County on December 6, 2022, in response to a public records request by Lake. Maricopa County produced 1149 of these documents dated October 12th through November 7th but not a single document from Election Day drop box ballot retrievals. The official canvass report indicated that Maricopa County received over 292,000 EV ballots (not including provisional and ballots picked up by the U.S. Postal Service) dropped off on Election Day. However, Maricopa County did not produce chain of custody documents for these reported Election Day drop box ballots.

The fact that no required chain of custody documentation exists for these 298,942 ballots (as well as others) is further confirmed by the sworn testimony of a credentialed election observer at MCTEC on Election Day. That observer testified she observed the trucks and vehicles delivering ballots and memory cards from the Vote Centers and ballot drop boxes. She observed the delivery of the transport containers of ballots retrieved from drop boxes on Election Night. The witness observed the receipt and processing of the ballot transport containers. She saw MCTEC workers cut the plastic security seals off of the ballot transport containers and let them fall to the floor without any attempt to record seal numbers. When the transport containers were opened, the ballots inside the containers were not counted and therefore no numbers were recorded on retrieval forms.  She observed the transport containers of early voting ballots delivered without any required documentation or paperwork on the outside of the containers. No Early Voting Ballot Transport Statements were utilized. She observed early ballot envelopes being removed by workers from opened containers without any attempt to count them or document them as required by Arizona law. She observed packages of misfed/misread ballots collected and moved around with no discernable process to track or account for the ballots. She observed temporary employees moving unsecured metal carts full of ballots without any security or monitoring.[3]

Keep reading…..

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

The Twitter Files: My Paranoia Has Been Vindicated thumbnail

The Twitter Files: My Paranoia Has Been Vindicated

By MercatorNet – Navigating Modern Complexities

‘Twitter is both a social media company and a crime scene,’ says Elon Musk, its new owner.


In October, following months of speculation and controversy, Elon Musk closed on his deal to acquire Twitter.

Among the most valuable assets Musk obtained in the US$43 billion purchase were reams of secret internal communications amongst Twitter executives.

Musk made those communications public over the weekend, and summed up their contents by tweeting: “Twitter is both a social media company and a crime scene.”

Musk has tasked three independent journalists with unpacking that crime scene to the public, providing they publish their findings on Twitter first: Matt TaibbiMichael Shellenberger, and Bari Weiss.

The Taibbi-Shellenberger-Weiss reports, since dubbed the Twitter Files, have set the internet on fire.

It is now without question that Twitter executives colluded with the FBI to systematically censor the speech of American citizens and a sitting American President. Their motives were political: a conclusion that is inescapable since Twitter’s leadership did their dark deeds in violation of the platform’s own policies.

Major figures at Twitter played their dystopian games while lying to the public. “We don’t shadow ban, and we certainly don’t shadow ban based on political viewpoints,” former CEO Jack Dorsey claimed during the Trump presidency.

At Senate hearings, Dorsey repeatedly and explicitly told Congress that he and his employees did not let their political viewpoints interfere with Twitter’s commitment to free speech.

Dorsey and his underlings — like former Chief Legal Officer Vijaya Gadde, and Yoel Roth, former Head of Trust and Safety — insisted that any censorship they enacted flowed from safety concerns for users, not the political whims of Twitter staff.

They told users that they intended Twitter as a place to break and discuss news, a free megaphone available to all, a global town square.

Behind closed doors, Twitter executives were shadow banning users they did not like, hiding their tweets, and making their profiles unsearchable via Twitter’s search bar. Users were censored arbitrarily and in secret, with no way to know they were being censored, much less protest or appeal the vindictive bans.

What Twitter did was the equivalent of Telstra putting static on the phone lines of Greens voters, or AGL feeding remote townships intermittent power as a punishment for voting National — all the while claiming innocence. Twitter’s secretive measures were far more widespread than the many outright suspensions the public knew about at the time.

As Glenn Greenwald, another independent journalist, has since commented:

Yoel Roth, meeting with FBI weekly, and his little censorship minions absolutely degraded Twitter into little more than a full-on Democratic Party activist machine, all while lying to the public about its function. This was a massive public fraud and 2020 election interference.

Stanford University epidemiologist Dr Jay Bhattacharya was one of Twitter’s many victims. I had the pleasure of meeting Dr Bhattacharya earlier this year in Sydney. It would be hard to find a more polite, measured, and thoughtful academic.

One of the original drafters of the Great Barrington Declaration,  Bhattacharya’s great sin was to speak out against Covid lockdowns and school closures from 2020 onwards.

“I spent the afternoon yesterday at Twitter HQ at the invitation of @elonmusk to find out more about the trend ‘blacklist’ that twitter placed on me,” Bhattacharya today tweeted. He continued:

Twitter 1.0 placed me on the blacklist on the first day I joined in August 2021. I think it was my pinned tweet linking to the @gbdeclaration that triggered the blacklist based on unspecified complaints Twitter received… Twitter 1.0 rejected requests for verification by me and @MartinKulldorff. Each time the reasoning (never conveyed to us) was that we were not notable enough.

The most high-profile personality to be censored and ultimately suspended by Twitter was of course President Donald Trump.

“In this specific case, we’re changing our public interest approach for his account…” was how Yoel Roth justified the decision. It was a case of making up new rules on the fly to censor conservatives, delivering verdicts first and updating Twitter policies later — all while in open communication with FBI officials.

As one critic puts it: “Twitter didn’t enforce their rules, they sat around and discussed how they could interpret their rules to silence their enemies.”

For years we were told that Trump colluded with Russia to steal the 2016 election. It appears that in reality, the FBI was colluding with Twitter with the aim of stealing the 2020 election from Trump.

A Big Tech insurrection? A digital January 6?

I began writing about social media censorship in mid-2019. At the time, I was laughed down by many followers and even friends. I was told not to be so paranoid, not to indulge in conspiracy theories.

Pre-Musk Twitter has now been caught with its hands in the proverbial cookie jar.

The wokerati can claim that the United States government colluding with Big Tech to tilt elections and censor conservative Americans is good, but they can no longer claim it didn’t happen.

And for all those upset with Elon’s takeover of the little blue bird, I have a message for you: Twitter is a private company. If you don’t like how it’s being run now, go build your own social media platform.

AUTHOR

Kurt Mahlburg is a writer and author, and an emerging Australian voice on culture and the Christian faith. He has a passion for both the philosophical and the personal, drawing on his background as a graduate… More by Kurt Mahlburg

EDITORS NOTE: This MercatorNet column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Unmasking the Underground Enemy: Russia thumbnail

Unmasking the Underground Enemy: Russia

By Simona Pipko

Sixty years ago, being a member of the Russian legal community, I learned an important quote by the KGB’s Chairman Yuri Andropov at the time: “information is the precious commodity in politics.”  I have remembered this quote for life. It is for that exact reason, I have been writing about the KGB’s agency for the last forty years, after immigrating to America. I knew that the agency would come to America to destroy it. I knew that, because I knew several generations of Stalin’s devoted disciples: Khrushchev, Andropov, and Putin. They all developed, technologically advanced and industrialized Stalin’s plan to create One World Socialist/Communist Government under the Kremlin’s Rule.

Only in America

I am a political refugee from the Soviet Union and a citizen of the U.S.A. When I came to New York City forty-one years ago, I didn’t know the language. Can you imagine a professional speaker who couldn’t open her mouth to construct a simple sentence? It was a very tough time for me. To learn English, I was listening to the radio 24/7, sleeping with it. My desire and tenacity to know the language had no borders. I need it to assimilate with my adopted country. The more I learned about American history and our Founding Fathers, the more I loved their unique and brilliant political system. At the time Churches in New York City had established classes on English as a second language. I attended this class to study the language in one of the Churches.

The pastor of the Church and its administration knew that I had been a defense attorney in Russia and someone from the Church called the Bar Association and told them about me. One morning my phone rang and a man invited me to participate in a conference or meeting about Soviet Law. To speak English on the phone was a torcher for me, even the words I knew escaped me, I was able to answer only “Yes” and “OK.” God gave me the energy and audacity to go to the meeting…

After a short starter the Chair introduced me and offered me the podium… And again, God helped me to make the first sentence: “Thank you for the invitation… but… I don’t know the language… There was a moment of silence… Then a young man stood up: “Don’t worry, I’ll translate everything.” To make a long story short, the meeting lasted three hours, I answered hundreds of questions and realized that America’s lawyers didn’t know Russia and its Intel and Security Apparatus. America didn’t know Stalin’s Soviet System that three hundred million people had been living under. This meeting had made me a writer…

The young translator’s name was Albert Pucciarelli. The next day we started a collaboration and wrote numerous articles. I was writing them in Russian and he was translating them in English and sending them to the publisher. Albert had a wife and children, he was the only person making a living for the family and a very busy lawyer. I’d recommend you read our first article: Passport to Dictatorship, Human Rights, 1986. When our teamwork ended, I began to write by myself and found a volunteer who edited my columns. The subject stays the same: Russia and its Intel and Security Apparatus. A lot of unexpected and unexplained crimes, car, plane accidents and a new COVID are ahead of us. Knowledge of Russian Intel and Security Apparatus is a Must.

If you haven’t read my books or columns, you don’t know what the KGB’s Mafia/Army means. It is a combination of all Soviet/Russian intelligence and security agencies under a new term The KGB’s Mafia/Army. Reading my earliest column, you will grasp the major revelation: Nothing has changed in Russia, the war against Western civilization has been going on for the last hundred years. Yet everything has changed in America: Truman’s Party is dead, instead we have America’s Socialist Party. The conversion has been done by the Russian KGB’s Mafia/Army—a DOER.

Stalin’s Devoted Disciples

Do you remember Khrushchev’s claims to Americans: “Your children will live under Communism!” He promised that in 1959 and it is under his leadership that the major Order was enacted. It was a document by the Soviet Defense Council and the KGB in 1955, the first formal Soviet decision to launch narcotics trafficking against the Bourgeoisie and especially against American capitalists: “Soviet strategy for revolutionary war is a global strategy… narcotics strategy is a sub-component of this global strategy.

…First was the increased training of leaders for the revolutionary movements—the civilian, military, and intelligence cadres. The founding of Patrice Lumumba University in Moscow is an example of one of the early actions taken to modernize the Soviet revolutionary leadership training.

The second step was the actual training of terrorists. Training for international terrorism actually began as ‘fighters for liberation’…The third step was international drug and narcotics trafficking. Drugs were incorporated into the revolutionary war strategy as a political and intelligence weapon to use against the bourgeois society and as a mechanism for recruiting agents of influence around the world.”

The current death of a one hundred thousand Americans from drugs is a result of the Socialist/Communist war now waged in accordance with that document by Russia, China, Iran, and others. Analyze the recent swap of prisoners with Russia, the WNBA Griner to Viktor Bout. The KGB’s General Viktor Bout, a terrorist, who was acting around the globe in accordance with the Document of 1955. The current crime is echoing the last century and projects the future…

The next Stalin devoted disciple is Yuri Andropov. Working within the Soviet legal community, through my friends from law school, I knew pretty well the KGB Chairman Yuri Andropov 1967-1982. He is the man responsible for increasing the war against the West in America. As Stalin’s devoted disciple, he designed the simultaneous infiltration by the KGB into the American media and Security Apparatus. I heard about that design in 1960-1970, I did not believe it. I never thought I would witness that in America in my lifetime. I did. Read my book The Russian Factor: From Cold War to Global Terrorism, XLIBRIS, 2006.

Andropov’s design to infiltrate the American media was put in action by Bill Clinton, recruited by Andropov’s KGB in 1969-1970. Read about the Clinton Mafia in my books and columns. I don’t trust any member of his mafia. Clinton assigned his lieutenant George Stephanopoulos to deal with the Fourth Branch of the American gov. and George produced the result we’ve

Witnessed today. I don’t trust George. He was interviewing 90 % of America’s Socialists/Communists to mislead you and cover up the truth. The media, as Andropov planned, has become a Soviet style government tool “working” in tandem with the American Security Apparatus. We have it under Biden’s regime—the Soviet Style Socialism…

The third Stalin devoted disciple is Vladimir Putin. If the first two acted in the 20th century, Putin is very busy in the 21st century. Don’t forget, Putin and the KGB are one completed product of my new term: the KGB’s Mafia/Army. That Mafia/Army is the major force of the Biden regime, demolishing us from within. The Biden policy of open borders was in collusion with Putin, who executed the Muslim Invasion in Europe in 2015. The situation is tragic for the American Constitutional Republic. The KGB’s Mafia/Army does organize migrants and unaccompanied children across the globe, a-la Stalin’s ploy with Spanish children after the Spanish Civil War 1936-1939. The traces of Stalinist Soviet Socialism are here in America…

I didn’t change my mind and I am still insisting on my previous opinion: we have an old Putin/Biden conspiracy running America. Yes, the retreat from Afghanistan was designed by Putin and executed by the KGB’s Mafia/Army of the White House. This conspiracy against the American Constitutional Republic must be immediately stopped by implementing the 25th Amendment against demented President, Joe Biden. This is an emergency!

The Soviet Mafia in America

The recent prisoner’s swap of Brittney Ginger to Viktor Bout is evidence of it. An international arms dealer named—Merchant of Death was freed to return to Russia. That swap was a typical move from Putin’s playbook over demented Joe Biden: the White House team preferred the anti-American WNBA player to an American marine, Paul Whelan who was left to rot in Russia. We will pay a high price for releasing the most dangerous man in the world—Russian arms dealer, Victor Bout. The Putin/Biden team “worked” together to complete the swap, to return Bout to Russia: Putin desperately needed his KGB’s Mafia/Army General to win the war in Ukraine. Just learn about Bout and his terrorist anti-American activities across the globe. There are patterns in Biden’s team, affecting America negatively and beneficially for Russia…

The GOP has failed the Midterm Election 2022 for many reasons, but the major one is that: the GOP didn’t give people a major cause-motivation to vote for Republicans: i.e. national security. The GOP didn’t know Putin’s Russia and its Intel, they didn’t accuse the Democrats of collusion with the Russian Intel, which meant treason. As a result of their silence we have a mentally unfit Commander-in-Chief. The Republicans missed a chunk of Russian history, allowing the Dem collusion with the Russian Intel. Now the FBI/Biden/Putin conspiracy has been exposed by Musk. I have been writing about the Soviet Mafia in America for the last forty years. Read: http://bit.ly/3OTz9Uz

I have been writing about the KGB’s agency and the major Soviet methods. They are the following, Socialist modus operandi: lies, deception, fabrication and fraud. I also gave a term for the agents: Socialist Charlatans. Perhaps those words don’t alarm Americans, as they don’t know about Socialism. Maybe a better term is Socialist Mafia? I have sent my columns to dozens of Congressmen and Senators. They used my information, but none mentioned the titles of my columns to spread the news and warn Americans. The GOP has failed us. Yes, Putin/Biden ploys against the American Constitutional republic are moving to 2023.

The Special Council John Durham was unable to complete his investigation and publish a report. Alas! But…Don’t be disappointed. There is an extensive in depth substitute for his report—my books and columns. I have been writing about three Manchurian Presidents in America. You can read my columns, starting with the earliest ones to understand what is going on in America today. You can read them for free at www.drrichswier.com/author/spipko/

Musk’s revelations about the Democratic influence over the old Twitter are proof of all my books and columns. It had a real blacklist, Don Bongino called it an old Soviet Bolshit. He is right. To grasp the current events in America, I would suggest you read my previous column, (December 1, 2022) where I mentioned “the old Soviet agency of Mind Control and

Censorship.” I am afraid that the agency is doing the same in America. The Democrats misled you today to cover-up their treason. Reading this column you will know who conducted this “operation disinformation” for two centuries. Knowing the KGB’s Mafia/Army, I believe the same infiltration has been proceeding on all media conglomerates carrying information. Do you remember Andropov’s quote that I heard back in the 1960-1970’s?

To be continued www.drrichswier.com/author/spipko/ and at www.simonapipko.com.

©Simona Pipko. All rights reserved.

U.S. Navy Forced to Make Dangerous Compromise as Biden’s Military Obsesses About Diversity thumbnail

U.S. Navy Forced to Make Dangerous Compromise as Biden’s Military Obsesses About Diversity

By Royal A. Brown III

But it’s not just the Navy—our entire Military, every branch is now WOKE at policy making levels thanks to Obama clone Secretary if Defense Austin, his Under Secretaries and all current Generals and Admirals who should be retiring rather than serving a socialist government and forcing DEI, CRT, Climate Change, and other Marxist policies on the men and women in the trenches.

WATCH: U.S. Navy in SHAMBLES as focus moves away from military readiness toward Woke diversity training.

Emphasis is no longer on combat readiness and being able to fight and win against an enemy!

Navy Forced to Make Dangerous Compromise as Biden’s Military Obsesses About Diversity

 By Peter Partoll, Western Journal • December 9, 2022

The U.S. Navy is addressing a massive drop in recruitment numbers by making a dangerous compromise that could leave the country in a much more vulnerable position.

On Monday, USNI News reported that the Navy is lowering admittance requirements for one of its entrance exams.

Under the plan, recruits who score lower on the Armed Forces Qualification Test can now be accepted into the Navy so long as they score high enough on the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery.

According to USNI, the Armed Forces Qualification Test essentially determines if recruits have the ability to succeed as members of the armed forces. The Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery tests recruits to see which role in the Navy would suit them best.

Navy spokesman Cmdr. Dave Benham told USNI, “As we continue to navigate a challenging recruiting environment, changing the AFQT requirement removes a potential barrier to enlistment, allowing us to widen the pool of potential recruits and creating opportunities for personnel who wish to serve.”

Read the full article.

©Royal A. Brown III. All rights reserved.

RYAN WALTERS: We Are Fighting Back Against The Left’s Radical Education Agenda In Oklahoma. Here’s How… thumbnail

RYAN WALTERS: We Are Fighting Back Against The Left’s Radical Education Agenda In Oklahoma. Here’s How…

By The Daily Caller

Despite Republicans securing a narrow majority in the House, Democrats have managed to maintain control of the Senate. To make matters worse, Joe Biden still sits in the White House where he can cram his radical education agenda down American parents’ throats across the country.

The tide is turning.

Oklahoma’s parents said “enough is enough,” and helped me crush my Democratic opposition in order to stop the left from indoctrinating our children in the classroom. I intend to take the fight to the left as the State Superintendent for Education.

The election night results speak for themselves. My Democratic opponent lost the race by a large margin. If that doesn’t say Oklahomans want a change, I don’t really know what does. Our state wants to send a message to Biden and his left-wing allies: “Oklahoma won’t go woke!”

Conservative states are fighting back against the radical Biden agenda and ensure that students receive an education that ensures students know American history without indoctrination, maximizes parental empowerment and provides transparency so that taxpayers can hold bureaucrats responsible for every dollar spent by our schools.

We are stopping Critical Race Theory from being taught, stopping access to obscene pornography in our schools, and ending the tenure of radicalism and indoctrination of our kids because the left is waging a civil war in the our classrooms. No child should be told that they are racist.

Kids should graduate knowing how our country was founded and what those foundational elements are because it opens their future to be actively involved long-term.

Increase teacher pay so we get highly qualified teachers who know how to teach. Fifty-one percent of every dollar in Oklahoma goes to administrative costs. Oklahoma has invested more than $1 billion in recurring revenue for schools in the last 10 years.

That money has failed to reach the classroom and we must reverse that trend.

Decrease the bureaucracy by eliminating duplication and social-emotional learning that is the backbone of indoctrination. By holding administrators accountable we can return classroom teaching back to the basic fundamental needs that teach kids skill sets that prepare them for the workforce.

Every dollar should follow the kids. Parents should direct where their kids go to school. No exceptions. Empowering parents with choices and decisions is the only way to move Oklahoma from being bottom in education to leading the country in reform.

Radical change is the only way to move forward. We will not allow our kids to be collateral damage in this fight and we will not let the status quo be the standard for Oklahoma’s future.

The left has pushed for the most radical agenda we’ve ever seen.

We are fighting back, we will improve our kids’ education, and we will win this war.

Ryan Walters is the secretary of Education for Oklahoma. He is currently running for State Superintendent. 

The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the author and do not reflect the official position of the Daily Caller News Foundation.

AUTHOR

RYAN WALTERS

Contributor.

RELATED ARTICLE: JAMES PINKERTON: As BlackRock Becomes BlueRock, A RedRock Is Coming

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved. All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

Twitter Exec Pushed To Ban Matt Gaetz’ Account After Jan. 6 thumbnail

Twitter Exec Pushed To Ban Matt Gaetz’ Account After Jan. 6

By The Daily Caller

Twitter’s former head of Trust and Safety, Yoel Roth, pushed internally for the company to ban Republican Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida following the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riots, despite messaging another employee that such a decision did not align with the company’s policies, according to the company’s internal documents published by author Michael Shellenberger Friday as part of Twitter CEO Elon Musk’s “Twitter Files.”

An employee, whose name was redacted, messaged Roth around noon on Jan. 7, 2021, asking “What’s the latest on Antifa claims?” — seemingly in reference to a Jan. 6, 2021, tweet by Gaetz alleging that members of the anarchist movement Antifa had “infiltrated Trump protestors who stormed Capitol” — and noting that another employee, identified only as “C,” was “yelling from the other room that we should just ban Gaetz,” Shellenberger reported. Roth responded that Twitter had employees “working on that.”

“It doesn’t quite fit anywhere (duh),” Roth said, prompting agreement from the unnamed employee before he continued, according to the messages posted by Shellenberger. “But I’m trying to talk safety into treating it as incitement … I think we’ll get over the line for removal as a conspiracy that incites violence … [then-head of Legal, Policy and Trust] Vijaya [Gadde] was directionally okay with it.”

Around noon, a confused senior executive in advertising sales sends a DM to Roth.

Sales exec: “jack says: ‘we will permanently suspend [Trump] if our policies are violated after a 12 hour account lock’… what policies is jack talking about?”

Roth: “*ANY* policy violation” pic.twitter.com/ExSFNM7BAb

— Michael Shellenberger (@ShellenbergerMD) December 11, 2022

Gaetz’ account was ultimately never banned, despite the internal discussions.

The discussion occurred roughly seven hours before Roth would inform a sales executive that Twitter was “changing [its] public interest approach for [Donald Trump’s] account to say any violation would result in a suspension,” Shellenberger reported. Twitter policy protects tweets from elected officials that would otherwise violate its rules under so-called “public-interest exceptions,” which allow tweets to remain live so that the public may be aware of and discuss the users’ “actions and statements.”

Gaetz later had a June 1, 2021 tweet that read “Now that we clearly see Antifa as terrorists, can we hunt them down like we do those in the Middle East?” hit with one such public-interest label for violating Twitter’s rules regarding the glorification of violence. At time of writing, Twitter users cannot share, like or comment on that tweet, but can still “quote tweet” it.

“This Tweet violated the Twitter Rules about glorifying violence,” the label reads at time of writing. “However, Twitter has determined that it may be in the public’s interest for the Tweet to remain accessible.”

Neither Twitter nor Gaetz’ office immediately responded to a Daily Caller News Foundation request for comment.

AUTHOR

JOHN HUGH DEMASTRI

Contributor.

RELATED ARTICLES:

‘Wow!’ Twitter Ran Massive Election Interference Operation Against Candidates Running for Office, Elon Musk Confirms

Twitter Deleted Posts With Pics Of Trump’s Tweets In Them — Even If They Were Bashing Him

‘Slippery Slope’: Internal Docs Show Just One Twitter Employee Raising ‘Serious’ Free-Speech Concerns Over Trump Ban

In Joe Biden’s Woke America, Enemies Exploit Our Achilles Heel

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved. All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

Twitter’s prior leadership accused of facilitating child porn thumbnail

Twitter’s prior leadership accused of facilitating child porn

By Church Militant

Illegal accounts ‘acted with impunity for years’.


SAN FRANCISCO (ChurchMilitant.com) – Twitter systematically failed to remove child pornography from its platform for years, allowing accounts to operate with impunity.

The revelations came from Andrea Stroppa, who works on Twitter’s Trust and Safety Council, who published a series of tweets about the council’s recent findings Friday night.

“We found several accounts that shared CSAM [child sexual abuse material], including videos of children and teens involved in sexual activities,” he wrote, explaining that “>95% of these accounts were created before Elon Musk bought Twitter. Some of these accounts have been active for years (even since 2017).”

“These accounts that shared CSAM acted with impunity for years,” he noted. “The contents of these accounts obtained over ten million views on Twitter. Yes, 10.000.000 views.”

“They won’t get any new views because Twitter has now taken down all these accounts,” he added.

Prior to Elon Musk’s takeover, Twitter refused to suspend most of the accounts posting criminal content, opting instead to delete the offending posts while allowing the accounts to remain active.

Stroppa co-authored a 17-page report in September titled “Child Porn on Twitter,” which accused prior Twitter executives of “doing next to nothing to fix” the problem of CSAM on its platform.

“Twitter is known to have very permissive policies regarding pornographic content and indeed such content is easy to find on the platform,” the report noted. “However, our research shows something much more troublesome: in the initial 20 days of September 2022, over 500 accounts shared, requested and/or publicly exchanged child pornography material.”

In a Twitter Space, @elonmusk shared the concerns he saw with Twitter that led to him wanting to purchase it. Gratitude towards @elizableu & @andst7, was voiced, for their help in exposing the child exploitation blight. Elon, since purchase, has made this #1 priority to purge. pic.twitter.com/Qw73K4dl5X

— K10✨ (@Kristennetten) December 10, 2022

Eliza Bleu, a victim of human trafficking who now works as a child victims’ advocate, took part in a Twitter Spaces discussion Friday night discussing Twitter’s failure to prioritize child porn while spending resources on censoring voices that expressed political viewpoints Twitter did not approve of.

“I watched folks get banned over using words that aren’t even illegal to use,” Bleu said. “The child sexual abuse material had been on Twitter for four years, 10 million views, and yet if you said certain words, especially during the pandemic, especially during an election season, you were removed instantly.”

Her words echoed an earlier tweet that day: “Twitter prioritized the censorship of non-illegal speech over the removal of child sexual abuse material at scale. Let that sink in.”

It led to confirmation from Musk: “Exactly correct.”

Twitter prioritized the censorship of non-illegal speech over the removal of child sexual abuse material at scale.

Let that sink in.

— Eliza (@elizableu) December 9, 2022

Musk later joined the Twitter Spaces discussion, confirming that he is making the elimination of child porn his first priority.

“I was actually really shocked to learn about it,” he said, going on to say that “literally top priority in the whole company is that Twitter cannot be used for child exploitation.”

Bleu, who has been highly critical of Twitter’s failures to protect children on its platform, had high praise for Musk.

“I think this is a new day and time for Twitter,” said Bleu, later adding, “You’ve blown my mind. And I was Twitter’s biggest hater. … You will see children’s lives are saved as a result of these changes on Twitter.”

Trust and Safety Council

Friday’s revelations centered on Twitter’s Trust and Safety Council, tasked with removing child porn from the platform. The group plays such a key role at Twitter that Musk even tweeted, “The real CEO was the head of ‘Trust & Safety’.”

Musk and former Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey openly sparred over allegations Dorsey failed to do enough to remove child porn.

“It is a crime that they refused to take action on child exploitation for years!” tweeted Musk.

It led to a denial by Dorsey: “This is false.”

It is a crime that they refused to take action on child exploitation for years!

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 9, 2022

“No, it is not,” Musk retorted. “When Ella Irwin, who now runs Trust & Safety, joined Twitter earlier this year, almost no one was working on child safety. She raised this with Ned & Parag, but they rejected her staffing request. I made it top priority immediately.”

No, it is not.

When Ella Irwin, who now runs Trust & Safety, joined Twitter earlier this year, almost no one was working on child safety.

She raised this with Ned & Parag, but they rejected her staffing request.

I made it top priority immediately.@ellagirwin

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 9, 2022

Irwin confirmed this in a tweet: “I fought hard to get funding to replace the people working on this who left in early 2022 and was told no. At one point there were 0 engineers and very few employees working on CSE and still no funding.”

Joining the Twitter Spaces discussion, Irwin added that funding for the council had been slashed years ago, and when she joined “it was a skeleton crew.”

Bleu responded to the thread, “I like you Jack. I always did. It would be incredible if you just grew a pair and admitted that Twitter didn’t prioritize this issue and remove child sexual abuse material at scale. And you owe John Doe # 1 and # 2 a formal apology.”

I like you Jack. I always did.

It would be incredible if you just grew a pair and admitted that Twitter didn’t prioritize this issue and remove child sexual abuse material at scale.

And you owe John Doe # 1 and # 2 a formal apology.

— Eliza (@elizableu) December 9, 2022

Earlier that day, three members of Twitter’s Trust and Safety Council announced their resignations, complaining that under Musk, “the safety and wellbeing of Twitter’s users are on the decline.”

Three of us resigned from Twitter’s Trust & Safety Council today: @eirliani @podesta_lesley and me. Here’s why https://t.co/h05TblfGIO pic.twitter.com/iqcHvhbgms

— annecollier (@annecollier) December 8, 2022

Among those resigning was Lesley Podesta, niece of John Podesta, former campaign chairman for Hillary Clinton.

The tweet garnered immediate backlash.

“You all belong in jail,” wrote conservative commentator Mike Cernovich.

He posted a link to a New York Post article on a lawsuit accusing Twitter of leaving up child porn material after finding it did not violate the platform’s policies.

The plaintiff, John Doe, discovered explicit underage sexual videos of himself posted on Twitter in 2019. He and his mother filed complaints with Twitter asking that it be removed.

Twitter responded a week later, after the child pornography had been viewed more than 167,000 times and retweeted 2,223 times: “We’ve reviewed the content, and didn’t find a violation of our policies, so no action will be taken at this time.”

Doe wrote back in shock:

What do you mean you don’t see a problem? We both are minors right now and were minors at the time these videos were taken. We both were 13 years of age. We were baited, harassed, and threatened to take these videos that are now being posted without our permission. We did not authorize these videos AT ALL and they need to be taken down.

It was only after the Department of Homeland Security ordered Twitter to remove the illegal material that it complied.

“He was 13 years old and being extorted. What the hell is Twitter doing?” asked Professor Hany Farid, who helped develop PhotoDNA technology used to help stop the spread of child porn online.

A number of victims’ advocacy groups are backing the lawsuit, including the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children; Child USA; the Canadian Centre for Child Protection; and the Rape, Abuse and Incest National Network, among others.

Access to DMs

The Child Porn report revealed, “Direct messages (DMs) are still the preferred communication choice” for those trading illegal content.

On Thursday it was revealed that Twitter staff have access to users’ direct messages, leading to criticism that the platform had ample opportunity to catch the offending material but failed to do so.

“If Twitter could see your DMs as detailed in the #TwitterFiles / #TwitterFiles2 drop, doesn’t this mean they had countless exchanges of Child Pornographic Materials through DMs on their radar and just sat on it despite having tools to stop, report, and suppress it?” asked political commentator Malcolm Flex.

If Twitter could see your DMs as detailed in the #TwitterFiles / #TwitterFiles2 drop, doesn’t this mean they had countless exchanges of Child Pornographic Materials through DMs on their radar and just sat on it despite having tools to stop, report, and suppress it?

— Malcolm Fle✘ – 🇺🇸Amoral Mercenary🇺🇸 (@Malcolm_fleX48) December 9, 2022

The news comes one day after journalist Bari Weiss released the second set of Twitter files exposing Twitter’s practice of blacklisting, shadowbanning and suppressing conservative political speech.

The evidence directly contradicts claims by Dorsey and former Twitter lawyer Vijaya Gadde, who insisted Twitter did not shadowban accounts based on political viewpoint. They also made these claims before Congress.

Have a news tip? Submit news to our tip line.

AUTHOR

Christine Niles

EDITORS NOTE: This Church Militant column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

White Supremacist Plots to Blow Up Texas High School! No, Wait… thumbnail

White Supremacist Plots to Blow Up Texas High School! No, Wait…

By Jihad Watch

The U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs said it again in a report it published in November, “The Rising Threat of Domestic Terrorism”:

“National security agencies now identify domestic terrorism as the most persistent and lethal terrorist threat to the homeland. This increase in domestic terror attacks has been predominantly perpetrated by white supremacist and anti-government extremist individuals and groups.”

Conspicuously lacking from this oft-repeated claim are actual white supremacist terrorists, but a recent case in Texas may help: a man who is most certainly not black or Hispanic plotted to blow up a high school in Amarillo. There’s just one catch: in a bracing little reminder of the actual terror threats that the Left’s propaganda and fantasies have obscured, he’s a Muslim, a naturalized U.S. citizen from Iran.

Amarillo’s KVII reported Thursday that Erfan Salmanzadeh, 33, pleaded guilty on Monday to “use and attempted use of a weapon of mass destruction.” The “use” part of that stems from a July 2021 incident that brought Salmanzadeh to the attention of police. KVII noted Tuesday that Salmanzadeh “recorded multiple videos in which he referenced the high school.” In one of these videos, which Salmanzadeh recorded on July 22, 2021, he was “standing in his backyard speaking in a mixture of English and Farsi, said he was going to blow up Tascosa High School,” a public high school in Amarillo.

“We are going to blast the school,” Salmanzadeh, a Tascosa High School graduate, declared. What did he mean by “we”? The police have not said anything about that, and there is no hint in the available reports as to who his accomplices were, or if he even really had any. “We are going to hit Tascosa,” Salmanzadeh continued. “Look at these.” He then “pointed the camera at a nail bomb filled with shrapnel, a suicide vest filled with pipes labeled as explosives, a suitcase filled with containers labeled as explosives, and a backpack filled with bottles labeled as explosives.”

Four days after that, “a neighbor reported hearing a loud explosion at 3613 Lenwood Drive. The caller said they [sic; I don’t care what your gender studies prof told you, kids. People aren’t plural. The caller was a he or a she] heard a similar noise a few weeks earlier but did not report it.” When police responded to the call, they found a “large crater” in Salmanzadeh’s backyard that “appeared to have been created by an explosion.”

Salmanzadeh, however, attempted to explain the hole and the explosion away. He told the cops that he had been “popping small firecrackers” in his backyard, as well as “hitting them with a hammer.” And the hole? “He also said he was digging holes in the backyard with a shovel.”

Well, that would certainly explain it. But “when police walked through the house with Salmanzadeh’s father, Salmanzadeh admitted to police that he blew up his Xbox in his backyard using triacetone triperoxide (TATP). He said he placed a PVC pipe filled with TATP inside the Xbox to see how much damage it would cause. According to an APD bomb technician, TATP is a homemade explosive that is ‘extremely unstable and reacts violently to friction and shock.’ He admitted flushing a ‘gallon sized jar of TATP down the toilet’ after police arrived that morning.”

Salmanzadeh also admitted that he had “placed a suicide vest, nail bomb and the Xbox in a dumpster in the alley behind his home.” It was true: “Police found the suicide vest, nail bomb and Xbox in dumpsters in the alley.” The vest was suitably stylish: it was “brown with blue suspender straps and had several sewn pockets filled with red cylindrical-shaped tubes. The word ‘Dynamite’ appeared to be handwritten in black ink on some of’ the tubes. The nail bomb was a ‘cylindrical-shaped device with several red cylinders inside of it. Several rows of nails and BBs were taped around the nail bomb as shrapnel.’”

Police then searched this Nobel laureate’s home and found two PVC pipes; one had “what appeared to be a Christmas light glued to the side of it and with the end of the wires stripped bare”; the other featured “a piece of duct tape, with the word ‘Explosive’ written on it.” Both of these pipes “appeared to have an explosive filler.” They also found other material that is “often used in the creation of improvised explosive devices, such as equipment and precursor chemicals.” Videos showed Salmanzadeh “testing an explosive powder in his backyard.” He also had “journals that contained notes and formulas related to the production of explosives.”

He also had a plane ticket for July 28, 2021, on which date he “planned to fly to California” so as to “avoid being arrested ‘after any bombing or attack.’”

It was good of law enforcement authorities to discover Salmanzadeh’s plot even though he isn’t one of the white supremacist terrorists they spend the bulk of their time trying to find (or create). But how many more like him will succeed in their plots because our counterterror apparatus is hopelessly corrupt and politicized?

AUTHOR

ROBERT SPENCER

RELATED ARTICLES:

NYC: ‘I Killed Two Police Officers and My Religion Made Me Do It’

Germany: Climate thugs storm university lecture hall, endorse Hamas, demand annihilation of Israel

Pakistan: Christians are 1.27% of population, 30% of lynchings of blasphemy

New report: Muslims are seeking to establish a ‘transcontinental caliphate’

Germany: Two Muslim migrants rape, urinate upon and spit upon non-Muslim woman

Palestinian Authority’s Supreme Sharia Judge calls Jews ‘humanoids… apes and pigs’

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

U.S. MD: Covid Vaccinated People are a ‘Health Threat’ to Those Who Aren’t thumbnail

U.S. MD: Covid Vaccinated People are a ‘Health Threat’ to Those Who Aren’t

By Dr. Rich Swier

“Whether enough people will wake up in time to keep America from being dismantled, piece by piece, is another question — and the biggest question for this generation.” — Thomas Sowell


There has been much knowledge gained since January 2021 about Covid, the various vaccines used to treat Covid and the effects of the Covid flu and the vaccines on individuals.

I, the author of this column, and my wife and family have all had Covid and none of us were or have been vaccinated.

Our experiences are that, working with our family pulmonologist, we recovered with minimum trauma. Only one member of our family was hospitalized, all others recovered using various treatments at home. In my case I have severe asthma and 33% of my lungs do not function properly.

My wife and I were prescribed by our pulmonologist Plaxovid, steroids and a Z-Pac. We both fully recovered. However, my wife, who is a nurse, had a rebound effect from the Plaxovid and we will not be taking that drug again, should we once again come down with the Covid flu.

What we now know about Covid

We are learning a lot about Covid, its origins, its impact on humans and various remedies for recovery. Of course, like any flu, some will die, others will suffer major effects and be hospitalized and others will, via our bodies natural immune system, simply recover completely, with the aid of some medications unique to our needs.

Coming down with Covid is not a national emergency, rather it is a personal medical emergency that requires a solution developed between one’s physician and us, the patient.

Government has no role in this most recent pandemic other than to tell the truth and aid in the discovery of useful remedies to recover.

What is becoming clear are the following:

  1. According to WorldOMeter.info the global rate of recovery from Covid is 94.47%.
  2. According to WorldOMeter.info the U.S. recovery rate from Covid is 97.29%.
  3. According to WorldOMeter.info total deaths in the United States is 3,315 per 1 million in population.

Clearly Covid is not a serious national healthcare threat to Americans.

However, it does require that, like the ordinary flu, if one feels ill they should test themselves for Covid and if positive seek medical help.

What do Americans say about the side effects and the efficacy of taking the Covid vaccines?

Watch this Rasmussen video titled 12 MILLION PEOPLE! – Vaxxed Americans Report Major Side Effects, and Question Efficacy to understand what the side effects of getting vaxxed mean today.

View the Rasmussen poll of the American people, the V-safe data and the Israeli Ministry of Health safety report to learn more about Covid vaccines.

So it appears, according to the Rasmussen poll, that what one believes about getting vaxxed depends on one’s political affiliation and not personal experiences nor the facts or data from reputable sources on the side effects and efficacy of Covid vaccines.

What we now know about the Covid vaccines

It now appears that the U.S. government and those agencies who monitor our health have not been forthcoming about the side effects of getting vaccinated. It is also problematic that individuals who experience serious side effects and even death from taking one of the vaccines cannot sue the pharmaceutical companies because the U.S. government has given them immunity.

There is growing medical evidence that pharmaceutical companies and our own government are working to push vaccines that are indeed harmful and even deadly.

Watch this video of Dr. Peter McCullough, MD stating that vaccinated people are a health threat to the unvaccinated.

Here are some articles on Covid and the impact of  various policies on one getting vaccinated on the website C19Science.info published by John Droz, Jr.

COVID-19 — Repeated Important Information:

World Council of Health: Early COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines

FLCCC Long COVID Treatment Protocol

COVID-19: What You Need To Know (Physicians for Informed Consent)

If you have received a COVID-19 injection, here’s how to Detox

Place Your US Order for Free At-Home COVID-19 Tests

COVID-19 — Therapies:

FDA Says Telling People Not to Take Ivermectin for COVID-19 Was Just a “Recommendation”

Long Covid Protocol

COVID-19 — Injections:

CDC data shows VAERS is the tip of vaccine injury iceberg

Dr. McCullough: Blinded by COVID-19 Vaccination

CDC Withheld Data on Fatal Reaction to COVID Vaccine

Secret Government Reports reveal at least 1.8 Million people have ‘Died Suddenly’ since the roll-out of the COVID Vaccines across the USA, UK, CA, AUS, NZ & EU

Massachusetts Death Certificates Show Excess Mortality Could Be Linked to COVID Vaccines

Report: Vaccinated Americans a majority of COVID deaths for first time in August

Renowned Oncologist Sends Letter to End COVID Vaccine Program Immediately as Cancers and other Diseases are Rapidly Progressing in ‘Boosted’ People

Consequence of COVID-19 Vaccines–Permanent Installation of mRNA Genetic Code

COVID-19 — Injection Mandates:

Short video about new China COVID Protests

Biden, world leaders sign declaration to adopt vaccine passports for international travel

The U.S. Medical System is Collapsing after Mass Exodus of Doctors and Nurses

What Is the Third Party Technique?

UC Professors Decry Dangerous Booster Mandates for Students, Faculty, and Staff

COVID-19 — Masks:

Podcast: Facial Coverings (Masks) — Harmless or Harmful?

COVID-19 — Miscellaneous:

Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano’s recent talk on COVID-19

Global Health and the Art of Really Big Lies

Short Dr. Campbell video: Natural immunity protects

Video: Has Big Pharma Hijacked Evidence Based Medicine?

$25 Million Lawsuit: Malone vs Breggin, et al

Critically Thinking about Mass Formation Psychosis

Who is Dr. Asish Jha (President Biden’s Covid Czar)?

New Documentary: Died Suddenly official trailer

Report: The Time of COVID

Short video: ’Chilling’: Protester tells what the atmosphere is like in China

Jeff Landry Deposed Anthony Fauci Last Week. What Did He Find Out?

The Bottom Line

Government has no role in healthcare. However, since the passage of Obamacare, government has increasingly become the monitors, judges, jury, enforcers and executioners of government healthcare mandates.

Today, the patient and doctor relationship is, via programs such as electronic heath records, no longer private. What the patient wants and what the doctor thinks is best for individual patients no longer matters.

It is follow the government’s mask, social distancing, quarantines, business closures and endless vaccine mandates, or else.

Here are some solutions to fixing government overreach into individual healthcare decisions:

  1. Apply HIPPA to all electronic medical records by limiting access strictly to patients and their doctors.
  2. Allow patients to sue pharmaceutical companies for negative effects of their Covid vaccines.
  3. Restore “power to the patient” and get government agencies, insurance companies and pharmaceutical companies out of the picture.
  4. Restore the unique patient doctor relationship that is private and secure from interference.
  5. Immediately stop all Covid federal government mandates.

The myth of Covid has taken hold of the American psyche and done more damage that the disease itself.

Proved us wrong.

©Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

‘Slippery Slope’: Internal Docs Show Just One Twitter Employee Raising ‘Serious’ Free-Speech Concerns Over Trump Ban thumbnail

‘Slippery Slope’: Internal Docs Show Just One Twitter Employee Raising ‘Serious’ Free-Speech Concerns Over Trump Ban

By The Daily Caller

  • In the immediate aftermath of Jan. 6, a junior staffer at Twitter was the only employee that appeared to express “serious” concerns about the effect that banning then-President Donald Trump might have on users’ speech, according to author Michael Shellenberger Friday, citing internal documents provided by CEO Elon Musk.
  • The unnamed staffer’s comments stood in contrast to other employees, who, according to former head of trust and safety Yoel Roth, were not “happy” with Twitter’s position on Trump following the riots, Shellenberger reported.
  • “This now appears to be a fiat by an online platform CEO with a global presence that can gatekeep speech for the entire world – which seems unsustainable,” the staffer wrote, Shellenberger reported.

As Twitter executives sought a justification to ban then-President Donald Trump in the aftermath of the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riots, only one employee appears to have expressed “serious” concerns about the potential impact the move might have on users’ speech, author Michael Shellenberger tweeted Friday, citing internal Twitter documents provided by new CEO Elon Musk.

The employee, a junior staffer, posted a message in a lower-level channel on the company’s internal Slack messaging system, questioning the “one off” nature of the decision, which did not appear to match with Twitter’s public policies, according to Shellenberger. Twitter employees usually considered moderation decisions to be “one off” events when they were made at the discretion of Twitter employees, as opposed to following a particular policy, Shellenberger reported.

“This might be an unpopular opinion but one off ad hoc decisions like this that don’t appear rooted in policy are [in my opinion] a slippery slope and reflect an alternatively equally dictatorial problem,” the unnamed staffer wrote, according to Shellenberger. “This now appears to be a fiat by an online platform CEO with a global presence that can gatekeep speech for the entire world – which seems unsustainable.”

On J8, Twitter says its ban is based on “specifically how [Trump’s tweets] are being received & interpreted.”

But in 2019, Twitter said it did “not attempt to determine all potential interpretations of the content or its intent.” https://t.co/2jW1s5pH4W pic.twitter.com/8gZwIDtyUQ

— Michael Shellenberger (@ShellenbergerMD) December 11, 2022

Roughly 40 minutes after the junior staffer posted their initial concerns, they sent a follow-up message, citing an article by The Washington Post’s Will Oremus, then a writer for tech publication OneZero, which noted that Facebook’s decision to indefinitely ban Trump “lacks a clear basis in any of Facebook’s previously stated policies, highlights for the millionth time that the dominant platforms are quite literally making up the rules of online speech as they go along,” Shellenberger reported.

“My concern is specifically surrounding the unarticulated logic of the decision by FB,” the staffer wrote, according to Shellenberger. “That space fills with the idea (conspiracy theory?) that all … internet moguls … sit around like kings casually deciding what people can and cannot see.”

While Twitter employees debated the decision to ban Trump, then-CEO Jack Dorsey was on vacation in French Polynesia, ultimately delegating a significant amount of the company’s actions during the crisis to former head of Trust and Safety Yoel Roth and former head of Legal, Policy and Trust Vijaya Gadde, Shellenberger reported. Dorsey sent staffers an email on Jan. 7 telling employees that the company needs to maintain consistent moderation policies, according to Shellenberger. (RELATED: Twitter’s Chief Censor Met Weekly With US Intelligence Officials While Trump Was In Office, Internal Comms Reveal)

“Jack’s emails have been _fine_… but ultimately, I think people want to hear from Vijaya, or Del, or someone closer to the specifics of this who can reassure them that the people who care about this are thinking deeply about these problems and aren’t happy with where we are,” Roth messaged an unidentified employee, according to Shellenberger. “A few engineers have reached out to me directly about it, and I’m chatting with them… but it’s so clear that they just want to know that _someone_ is doing something about this, and it’s not that we’re ignoring the issues here.”

The unnamed employee responded, arguing that some employees might not understand that “while it seems obvious and simple that we ‘should’ [permanently ban] his personal account,” the company would have to wrangle with the possibility of banning Trump’s official government account as well, a decision that required “thinking things through,” Shellenberger reported.

While the company had faced pressure to block or ban Trump in the past, it typically resisted those calls; the company’s Public Policy team posted a tweet in 2018 which argued banning world leaders for “controversial Tweets would hide important information people should be able to see and debate,” and would limit discussion of that leader without meaningfully silencing them, Shellenberger reported.

Twitter did not immediately respond to request for comment from the Daily Caller News Foundation.

AUTHOR

JOHN HUGH DEMASTRI

Contributor.

RELATED ARTICLE: CAUGHT IN LIES: Latest Twitter Files Release Reveals Feds and Twitter Both Caught Lying, Hiding Evidence in Major Lawsuit; Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt Calls Them Onto the Carpet

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved. All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

UK Politician, Matt Hancock, seeks to make amends, and A Christian Perspective on Forgiving and Forgetting. thumbnail

UK Politician, Matt Hancock, seeks to make amends, and A Christian Perspective on Forgiving and Forgetting.

By Shirley Edwards

These are my views as a woman living in England, on how the culture and spirit of my country has changed over 50 years.  Why the country does not feel protected or strong any more, how it has lost, and is losing it values and decency, and how we are daily losing our free speech.


Be alert and of sober mind. Your enemy the devil prowls around like a roaring lion looking for someone to devour. 1 Peter 5:8

Quite some number of years ago whilst attending an interview for a job, the interviewer asked me a very unexpected question.   It was a question, a statement, which has remained with me since, and for which I often think about:

“Can a Leopard, change its spots”?

My instinct in answering the question at the time, was to apply it to human nature, and to state that they can, no matter what their personality has been perceived to be.   There is always the possibility that despite being a certain type of person, people can, and do indeed change for the better.

However, despite feeling quite satisfied and very considerate with my ‘on the spot’ answer, I do remember coming away pondering much more deeply upon it.   There was possibly a lot more depth to that question, and it deserved much more consideration.

Life in the Jungle

In observing human nature, a British reality TV show entitled “I’m a Celebrity – Get me Out of Here” is an entertaining yet somewhat difficult show to watch.   Set in the outback of Australia, the format consists of celebrities living in extreme conditions, with none of their creature comforts, undertaking various challenges to win food for the group and avoid being voted out by the viewers.

Living in those conditions as members of a team who have never mixed before, often highlights a side of the celebrities’ personality that the public may have been unaware of.

This year there has been an enormous amount of controversy in relation to a very well- known politician taking part.  It has been a major topic of conversation and distraction to say the least.

Matt Hancock, the former Health Secretary of State for Health and Social Care from 2018 – 2021 for the UK, who strictly enforced Covid laws during that time and then broke them himself, announced he was entering the jungle to highlight ‘Dyslexia’ and to embrace popular culture and get more people interested in politics.  He also stated he wanted to show the public that politicians were ‘normal’ in the three weeks he would hopefully spend in the jungle.

Karma Chameleon

In attempting to normalize a politician’s appearance he appeared to sail through every single challenge and also appeared to become popular with some of the viewers through acting very cordial and considerate to his camp mates.   He was likeable.

On the questioning of some of his parliamentary decisions and actions, and the pain he had caused to the public from team members in the jungle, and his breaking of the covid rules himself that he had enforced on others, he attempted to weakly appeal to a forgiving side of their nature.   The only time he became indignant was when he said he had not broken any Covid laws because those rules were purely ‘guidance’

Whilst watching small clips from the show, it was also interesting to hear him speak about his affair and how he simply fell in love with his aide, Gina Coladangelo, during Covid.

I wondered if he felt any consideration towards his wife and three children at home in the UK, and how they would react to that being broadcast, and if this was now the popular culture he was embracing, and for what reason?

There were of course other celebrities in the show with chequered pasts.   One was the singer Boy George.  Ironically, he is known for a famous song called ‘Karma Chameleon’. Here he was living amongst lizards and snakes.  Together they all joined in singing the popular song.

The show became a strange and bizarre parody where the former Health Secretary who in the real world would often been seen running away from journalists at top speed, or dodging important questions with a basic arrogant ‘No’, now saw his redemption as answering some very basic questions with a softly spoken voice in a ‘reality show’.

One member of the team wanted Covid sweeping under the carpet now he had answered the basics.  They were there in the jungle to have fun, in a once in a lifetime experience, and get on together.   But, did they really got rid of the elephant in the room?

Is this the general attitude towards the ‘Amnesty’ that is now being manipulated and sought across the world, in regards to those who have committed very serious crimes against humanity?

Is it too painful and unforgiving of people to face the really serious consequences which were caused by the unmerited and inhumane actions of politicians against us?

The Snake

In a recent reading of a poem ‘The Snake’ penned by Oscar Brown, and recently read by Donald J Trump, once more I thought about the question once posed to me of a leopard changing its spots, and the inherent nature of a snake.

After a woman shows love and consideration to a dying snake, the recovered snake then bites and kills the one who has saved his life.  On complaining, the poem ends with:

“O shut up silly woman, said the reptile with a grin

“You knew damn well I was a snake before you let me in”

The correlation between the nature of animals and reptiles in relation to human nature is often misunderstood, most especially as some animals have become domesticated.   However, I do believe that the example of the leopard and the reptile can serve as an example to humans in that caution should always be sought in that some people have traits in them that can fool you, manipulate you, and even kill you without any conscience.

From a Christian perspective, a forgiveness towards others is usually coupled with also forgetting the perceived offence.

Manipulators, are very aware of this.

However, history, although divisive, and sometimes questionable, also tells us that millions, if not billions have been intentionally killed under cruel dictatorships.   These are instances we should never forget.

Under one example only from the recent history of China, under a five-year plan from 1958 to 1962 it is claimed that in his Great Leap Forward policy, up to 45 million people were killed under the dictatorship of Mao Zedong through famine and murder.  It is also claimed that between two and three million victims were tortured to death, for slight infractions under that regime.

The Great Leap Forward is a good study in how people can be divided and have all of their belongings taken from them.

Post Covid, it is quite alarming to find that such an historical event is now being quietly swept under the carpet and that many people do indeed have a wish to forget it and move on. This may be because they cannot see the bigger picture on what is being slowly implemented over a proposed 10-year world-wide plan by globalists, or they cannot believe that people can be so cruel, most especially as we have had the perception of being free people up until now.   It may be that they have not been personally damaged or affected by the cruel and inhumane way they were treated. They may believe it is all over.

Matt Hancock – Leopard, Snake or Human?

My final observations about MP for West Suffolk, Matt Hancock are not definitive.  His heart and his actions are known only to God, the Creator of mankind, who loves justice and righteousness. The parts we play in every aspect of life, most especially when we cause harm to others are ‘answerable’

Leaders are people we should be able to trust, but we no longer do.   They should not consider themselves to be celebrities, but should be servants to the people.

Already, the launch of his new book ‘The Pandemic Diaries’ is becoming questionable in that he is being accused of re-writing history.

We cannot afford to forget or re-write history.

The Human Jungle

Whilst currently resting in our hammocks, it was recently alleged that plans were afoot to create ‘climate lockdowns’ in the city of Oxford for 2024, which would restrict residents who do not possess a ‘pass/permit’ from using cars on busy roads during peak periods.

Under the £6.5 million scheme, the council have stated these the allegations are false, and that the scheme is not a climate lockdown but a ‘trial’ and that they are creating filters to give priority to buses, taxis and cyclists to see if the traffic will flow more freely and ease congestion around Oxford.

That’s a very expensive experiment!

Residents will not be locked down from entering or leaving their area but automatic number plate recognition cameras will register if a driver without permission attempts to use a road they shouldn’t.

After claiming that staff and councillors have been abused from residents who have protested due to the ‘misinformation’, they have stated they are now working with Thames Valley Police to report the most extreme cases of abuse.

Bearing in mind that many leading councillors in governmental positions, together with some heads of police forces, can be ‘common purpose’ trained, meaning that they are trained in using behavioural modification (coercion for the greater good) to lead outside of authority to their own agenda, does indicate that the public are now not completely blind to lies which eventually can lead to the real reason why permits have to be gained in order to travel in the city where they already pay council tax.

Permits and passes to move freely, regardless of filters to ease traffic should not be on the agenda.   Is this another microcosm experiment for use on a larger scale across the country and the world?   Do permits and passes equate to ‘pass-ports’ and who are the people who will may be disqualified further down the line?

You can read the joint statement from Oxford County Council and Oxford City Council here.

In every story throughout history there is a lesson to be learned and should never be forgotten.  The questions are always there.

Should snakes be trusted, and can a Leopard change its spots?

Links:

Trump reads “The Snake” poem – YouTube

I’m a Celebrity…Get Me Out of Here! (British TV series) – Wikipedia

Who is Matt Hancock? The former Health Secretary heading into the I’m A Celeb jungle camp | ITV News Anglia

Who Was the Biggest Mass Murderer in History? – Foundation for Economic Education (fee.org)

What Was the Great Leap Forward? (thoughtco.com)

Oxfordshire County Council respond to viral article claiming Oxford is going into ‘climate lockdown’ – Oxfordshire Live

Joint statement from Oxfordshire County Council and Oxford City Council on Oxford’s traffic filters | Oxford City Council

About Common Purpose | Common Purpose Exposed (cpexposed.com)

©Shirley Edwards. All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLE: Rasmussen poll shows the COVID vaccines are not safe

RELATED VIDEO: U.S. Dr. Peter McCullough, MD: Vaccinated People A Health Threat To Those Who Didn’t

Why is DHS ignoring a Muslim-only migrant shelter at the U.S. border? thumbnail

Why is DHS ignoring a Muslim-only migrant shelter at the U.S. border?

By Jihad Watch

DHS appears to be interested only in hounding domestic dissidents.


Why Isn’t Homeland Security Monitoring A Muslim-Only Immigrant Shelter At The US Border?

by Todd Bensman, The Federalist, December 6, 2022:

A shelter in Tijuana for U.S.-bound Muslim immigrants exemplifies the Biden administration’s dangerous mismanagement of the border crisis.

In October, U.S. Border Patrol caught another nine border-crossing immigrants who were on the FBI’s terrorism watch list, adding to the already record-breaking 98 during the just-ended fiscal 2022 and 14 during the prior fiscal year.

Those 121 suspected terrorist border crossings should strike President Joe Biden’s homeland security establishment and the general public as a “system blinking red” moment, to requote the infamous 9/11 Commission Report line about failures to act on threat information.

But my recent fact-finding trip to Mexico’s first and only shelter that expressly caters to U.S.-bound Muslim immigrants indicated Biden’s Department of Homeland Security (DHS) sees no blinking red lights amid this current mass-migration border crisis.

In June 2022, the San Diego-based Latina Muslim Foundation noticed significant enough numbers of U.S.-bound travelers from the Islamic world to justify opening the Albergue Assabil/Mesquijta Taybah shelter in a two-story, 8,000-square-foot former nightclub in Tijuana just two blocks from the border wall, which all who stay there intend to bypass one way or another. The shelter serves as a waystation for 30 to 140 immigrants at a time coming from Yemen, Syria, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Lebanon, Egypt, Morocco, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Somalia, Chechnya, and other regions in the Middle East, North Africa, and South Asia where terrorist organizations operate.

Latina Muslim Foundation Director Sonia Garcia told me she is concerned that Islamic terrorists may use her Tijuana shelter and does her best to ferret them out during interviews. She’ll even call in Mexican law enforcement authorities to investigate deceptive and suspicious persons. Mexican authorities recommended that she reject two of them for shelter assistance on terrorism grounds.

Read more.

AUTHOR

ROBERT SPENCER

RELATED ARTICLES:

Texas: Muslim migrant plotted to blow up high school

France: Seven Muslims arrested for plotting jihad massacre, two of them had only recently entered the country

Islamic outfit issues hit list of Kashmiri Hindus as filmmaker labels film on their persecution ‘vulgar propaganda’

Minnesota: Hamas-linked CAIR comes out in favor of racism in education grants

Muslims riot all over Europe after Morocco’s World Cup victory over Spain

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Young Montana Entrepreneur Is Being Legally Barred from Hauling Trash Because Established Players Don’t Want the Competition thumbnail

Young Montana Entrepreneur Is Being Legally Barred from Hauling Trash Because Established Players Don’t Want the Competition

By Foundation for Economic Education (FEE)

If it sounds crazy that established players get a say on who is allowed to compete with them, well, it should.


When Parker Noland launched his trash-hauling business at age 20 in the summer of 2021, he was excited about the opportunities that lay before him. After taking out a loan from a local bank, the Montana native bought a truck and some dumpsters and got to work promoting his services. The business plan was simple: he would deliver dumpsters to construction sites looking to get rid of debris and then transport the dumpsters to the county dump once they were full.

Things quickly got complicated for Noland, however. Though he had registered his business, gotten the proper insurance, and complied with all public health and safety standards, he was still missing one thing, a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity. As a result, right when he was about to get his business off the ground he was given a cease and desist order by the Montana Public Service Commission, the agency responsible for administering the Certificate law.

Noland applied for the Certificate shortly thereafter on September 8, 2021, but his troubles were just getting started. Two national garbage companies—his would-be competitors—protested his application, which they are allowed to do under the law. The companies issued various demands, such as data requests, and Noland’s legal expenses to fight the protests were soon thousands of dollars and counting.

On November 9, 2021, Noland made the difficult decision to withdraw his Certificate application, seeing as he could not afford the mounting legal expenses involved with fighting the protests. To this day, Noland remains ready and willing to run his trash-hauling business, but he is legally barred from doing so until he gets the Certificate.

On November 15, 2022, Noland teamed up with the Pacific Legal Foundation (PLF) to file an official complaint with Montana’s eleventh judicial district court, seeking a permanent injunction against further enforcement of the law on the ground that it violates his Constitutional rights.

If it sounds crazy that established players in an industry are empowered by the government to bury would-be competitors in unnecessary legal fees, well, it should. As PLF argues, these laws practically amount to a “competitor’s veto.”

“Montana’s Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity law allows established garbage companies to keep potential competitors like Noland out of the market,” PLF writes in their complaint. “Noland applied for a Certificate, but was forced to withdraw his application after some of the largest garbage companies in the nation protested his application, which imposed massive delays and created enormous financial costs. The Certificate provisions challenged in this case prevent Noland and other would-be entrepreneurs from working—not because they are unfit to operate—but to protect incumbent garbage companies from having to compete fairly.”

“Incumbents can protest for the bare reason that they do not want to face new competition,” PLF continues. “The Montana Public Service Commission is further empowered to reject an applicant because it believes there is no ‘need’ for a new company, and therefore that a new business would take away from the incumbent’s profits. Together these provisions create a Competitor’s Veto over those who wish to exercise their right to earn a living as a Class D hauler. This blatant economic protectionism is prohibited by the Montana and U.S. Constitutions.”

In sum, “the Competitor’s Veto allows existing garbage companies to force an applicant to undergo the time and expense of an administrative hearing that has nothing to do with the applicant’s public safety record, or any other matter related to public health or safety, but instead simply because existing garbage companies seek to restrict market competition.”

Noland is hardly the only entrepreneur running into this problem. As PLF notes, there were eight applications for a Class D (trash hauling) Certificate in Montana between January 1, 2018 and September 8, 2021. All eight faced protests. As a result of the protests, four of the applications were withdrawn, one was denied, and two were granted the Certificate only after agreeing to reduce the scope of their business.

The story of the one successful applicant who didn’t have to reduce their scope is revealing.

“The only applicant who succeeded in securing a Certificate over a protest, and without reducing the scope of its business, was L&L Site Services, Inc., on December 15, 2020,” PLF notes. “After a lengthy legal fight before the Commission, which involved extensive discovery, including 13 supplemental responses to Allied Waste Services’ data requests, a 5-day evidentiary hearing requiring legal representation, and contentious oral argument, L&L’s application was granted on April 29, 2022, over two dissenting votes from Defendants Brad Johnson and Randy Pinocci.”

The garbage company which protested their application has since filed a Motion for Reconsideration, which remains pending.

“Over the past 3 years,” PLF concludes, “the strongest predictor for getting permission to enter the trade of dumpster servicing was agreeing to reduce one’s operating authority to not compete with incumbents. And even though one applicant was able to afford the time and expense of the legal battle required by an incumbent’s protest, the challenged provisions still allowed the incumbent to inflict significant costs and delay on its potential competitor for purely anti-competitive reasons.”

Laws requiring a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity (CPCN) cover a variety of industries in different states—from trash collection to telecommunications to natural gas—but they all have similar impacts. They are closely related to Certificate of Need laws (CON laws) which create similar barriers in the healthcare industry (hospitals, nursing homes, ambulances, etc.) and in other industries such as transportation (specifically moving companies).

The justification for these kinds of laws is twofold. For one, proponents argue that allowing businesses to compete without demonstrating a “need” will lead to duplicative services, that is, an overabundance of supply in a given area. The problem, they contend, is that this will lead to higher prices because companies will charge more for the capacity they do use to compensate for the unused capacity. If a company builds a hospital, for example, but realizes it can’t fill half its beds because the market is already saturated with hospitals, it will ostensibly hike prices for the beds it does fill to compensate for its loss.

The other argument is that by restricting entry into “saturated” markets, politicians can use CPCN and CON laws to encourage entrepreneurs to set up shop in areas that tend to have less access to these services, such as rural areas.

These arguments may sound plausible at first glance, but upon closer inspection they are rather spurious. For one, how does a bureaucrat determine when a market is too saturated? There are no objective criteria here. What’s more, the very fact that an entrepreneur is planning to enter a market is evidence that, at least from their perspective, there are needs that are currently not being met by established players.

Another major problem with this analysis is the assumption that businesses can unilaterally raise prices in order to cover their costs. This is not how prices work. Prices are set by supply and demand. If anything, a greater supply in a region will lead to lower prices.

The idea that these laws are needed to push entrepreneurs to “lower access” regions is also dubious. An entrepreneur, almost by definition, is seeking to meet needs that haven’t already been satisfied. Thus, they naturally gravitate to precisely these “low access” regions. If they successfully set up shop in a supposedly “saturated” market, it is evidence that the market wasn’t, in fact, saturated. If their business in that region fails, on the other hand, the market will quickly usher them elsewhere all on its own.

Noland’s story is a case in point on this. As PLF notes, construction companies specifically sought out Noland because the large incumbent companies weren’t picking up bins in a timely manner. In other words, there was a market need that was clearly going unfulfilled. The market was not saturated, and that’s precisely why Noland was setting up shop in the first place. Further, Noland’s more compact truck “allowed him to offer services to areas where the incumbent companies did not,” something he was no doubt planning to take advantage of.

There’s a curious irony here. Though the Certificate law was intended to increase services in underserved areas, its practical impact is to restrict services in evidently underserved areas.

There’s an irony on the price front too. Though the law was intended to keep prices down, by restricting entry it is actually creating opportunities for incumbents to keep prices up!

Thus, on both issues, these laws are not only unnecessary, but counterproductive. They are hurting the very consumers they were supposed to protect, not to mention the would-be competitors like Noland who are effectively prohibited from entering the market.

The economist Murray Rothbard summarizes the effect of these policies well in his book Power & Market.

Certificates of convenience and necessity are required of firms in industries—such as railroads, airlines, etc.—regulated by governmental commissions. These act as licenses but are generally far more difficult to obtain. This system excludes would-be entrants from a field, granting a monopolistic privilege to the firms remaining; furthermore, it subjects them to the detailed orders of the commission. Since these orders countermand those of the free market, they invariably result in imposed inefficiency and injury to the consumers.”

While the Certificate law in Noland’s story is certainly troubling, the deeper problem this story highlights is the belief that government restrictions of the market can help consumers. The reality is exactly the opposite. The best way for the government to help consumers is to get out of the way, and in particular, to stop enforcing regulations that protect established players from new entrants. Let entrepreneurs compete. Let consumers have choices.

America was built by the Parker Nolands of the world, young entrepreneurs full of dreams and ambitions.

It would be a shame if we strangled that spirit with red tape.

This article was adapted from an issue of the FEE Daily email newsletter. Click here to sign up and get free-market news and analysis like this in your inbox every weekday.

AUTHOR

Patrick Carroll

Patrick Carroll has a degree in Chemical Engineering from the University of Waterloo and is an Editorial Fellow at the Foundation for Economic Education.

RELATED ARTICLE: Cuba’s Bustling Black Markets Hold an Important Economic Lesson

EDITORS NOTE: This FEE column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Biden Regime Denies Gov. DeSantis’ Request for Emergency Funds for Hurricane Ian Victims thumbnail

Biden Regime Denies Gov. DeSantis’ Request for Emergency Funds for Hurricane Ian Victims

By The Geller Report

Billions for Ukraine dictatorship, nukes for Iran but Americans get ….. the middle finger.

Biden’s FEMA denies Ron DeSantis’ request for emergency funds for Florida’s Hurricane Ian victims

Governor Ron DeSantis has announced that the state will pay $25 million to help rebuild homes after the extensive damage caused by Hurricane Ian.

The Post Millenial, December 2022:

Following FEMA’s denial of Florida’s request for emergency funds to help rebuild homes destroyed by Hurricane Ian, Ron DeSantis announced that the state will provide up to $25 million for emergency relief, according to Florida’s Voice.

“We’re not just gonna sit there and take no for an answer […] We’re gonna figure out what we can do […] We wanna cut through bureaucracy.” pic.twitter.com/NmgwV9RGnc

— Florida’s Voice (@FLVoiceNews) December 5, 2022

“Unfortunately, we got word last week that FEMA had denied our request for funding our state-led housing initiatives, citing their quote ‘limited authority,’” DeSantis said during an announcement in Southwest Florida, the region where Hurricane Ian made landfall.

“We’re not just gonna sit there and take no for an answer,” he said, “we’re gonna figure out what we can do.”

“We wanna cut through bureaucracy,” he continued, “we wanna bring relief to impacted Floridians, regardless of whether FEMA wants to be a part of that.”

FEMA responded to DeSantis’ request in a December 2 letter, saying “Due to the limited authorities FEMA has to approve and pay for this type of work, as well as our inability to confirm that authorizing this policy expansion would achieve the intended outcomes for disaster survivors, your request is denied.”

Keep reading.

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

RELATED ARTICLES:

WATCH Fake Doctor Jill Biden Urges All Americans To Get ANOTHER Covid Shot Before Christmas

FBI Agent Testifies About Bureau’s Involvement in Social Media Censorship

The Greatest Gaslight in History

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.