Exposé on German Inner Cities: ‘Zombieland’—Migration, Drugs, and Violence thumbnail

Exposé on German Inner Cities: ‘Zombieland’—Migration, Drugs, and Violence

By Matthys van Raalten

Dutch legal philosopher Eva Vlaardingerbroek together with a German team made a documentary about German inner cities. You can see the same sort of problems as you are familiar with in the U.S.

It’s sad to say, but Germany has become Zombieland.

Zombieland: Migration, drugs, and violence made German cities unbearable | NIUS Original

NiUS reports:

As we all can see, something has changed in Germany. There’s a new form of homelessness in our cities. The effects of drugs, violence, and migration are palpable everywhere. Crystal meth and heroin are found next to children’s playgrounds. Knife fights in front of train stations take place literally every day, and homeless people are decaying while still alive. People who migrated to Germany are struggling to cope. NIUS reporters Eva Vlaardingerbroek and Jan A. Karon document the ‘Zombieland’ from the front lines. The homeless share how they ended up in the streets – and what occupies their minds.

©2023. NiUS. All rights reserved.

University Spent Over $200,000 On ‘Diversity’ Course Teaching Physicians That Healthcare Is Racist thumbnail

University Spent Over $200,000 On ‘Diversity’ Course Teaching Physicians That Healthcare Is Racist

By The Daily Caller

The University of Minnesota (UMN) paid over $200,000 to develop a Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) training program that teaches medical professionals that healthcare is fundamentally racist, according to documents received by the medical watchdog Do No Harm and shared with the Daily Caller News Foundation.

The training, developed by Diversity Science, is intended to educate healthcare professionals on obstetric care for black and indigenous women, which the training dubs “birthing people,” and highlights perceived “structural racism” in healthcare practices. Moreover, UMN’s DEI office blames “white supremacy” for certain disparities in perinatal care, and trains providers to view the development of medicine and the healthcare system as tainted with racism, documents obtained by Do Not Harm reveal.

The hour-long training is intended to address individual biases and racial stereotypes in the healthcare industry, and is in response to a new law requiring certain hospitals to complete an education course on anti-racism and implicit bias, according to the Minnesota Health Department website.

The training video presents a timeline starting from 1619 to today describing medical racism throughout history. Although the program explains the importance of knowing the history before understanding the problems, the timeline provided does not acknowledge the Civil Rights movement or any progress made between 1914 to the present, according to documents provided by Do Not Harm.

Moreover, within the first module, the training quotes the American Medical Association (AMA)’s CEO, and argues that the existence of “structural racism” in healthcare is an incontrovertible fact.

“Structural racism exists in the U.S. and in medicine, genuinely affecting the health of all people, especially people of color and others historically marginalized in society,” AMA CEO James Madara said.

“This is not opinion or conjecture, it [structural racism] is proven in multiple studies, through the science and in the evidence,” the training states.

The university spent $219,633.00 to develop the course, the Daily Caller News Foundation previously reported.

training video titled “Dignity in Pregnancy & Childbirth: Preventing Racial Bias in Perinatal Care” states that “80% of the deaths of black birthing people are preventable.” However, the CDC states that 84% of pregnancy-related deaths were determined to be preventable, referring to the overall maternal mortality rate among women of all races.

The Diversity Science website states that they are an “evidence-based organization” that provides clients with real-world knowledge and effective programs.

The course is “part of an initiative whose goal is to ensure that Black and Indigenous women and birthing people achieve their full potential for healthy and productive lives,” according to Diversity Science’s website. The project’s goal is “to empower perinatal care providers with the foundational knowledge, insights and skills they need to ensure that Black and Indigenous women and birthing people receive fully equitable patient-centered, respectful, high-quality care free of bias and discrimination.”

The University of Minnesota and the Minnesota Health Department did not immediately respond to the DCNF’s request for comment.

AUTHOR

NICOLE LITTLEFIELD

Contributor.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Students Pressured University Not To Hire Professor Who Questioned ‘Diversity’ Statements. Then He Didn’t Get The Job

HHS Appears To Forget To Redact Email Calling For Expanded COVID-19 Mandates For Students

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

DHS Awards Anti-Terror Grant for LGBTQ Group to Indoctrinate 6-Year-Olds thumbnail

DHS Awards Anti-Terror Grant for LGBTQ Group to Indoctrinate 6-Year-Olds

By Family Research Council

The Biden administration has awarded an anti-terrorism grant worth more than half-a-million dollars to an LGBTQ activist group, which distributes condoms and “sex education” material, to expand its “in-school support for LGBTQ+ youth” as young as age 6. The manifesto of its school-based group — which is based on the Black Panthers — calls for the “abolition” of the police, the erasure of the U.S. border, and the “reclamation” of all “stolen lands” by indigenous people.

Joe Biden’s Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced that the Sexual Minority Youth Assistance League (SMYAL) had received a $530,000 Targeted Violence and Terrorism Prevention (TVTP) grant late this week. Although the TVTP grant is intended “to prevent targeted violence and terrorism,” the grant synopsis explains that the SMYAL “will provide in-school support for LGBTQ+ youth, training for school staff and youth service providers, [and] resilience programming for LGBTQ+ youth ages 6-24.” The grant will address both “the risk of violence and negative mental health outcomes faced by LGBTQ+ youth” in Washington, D.C., and nearby Montgomery County, Maryland.

GSA Networks Seek to Abolish the Police, Borders, and ‘Cisgender Heterosexual Patriarchy’

SMYAL’s latest 990 form states that its members run the “DC Regional GSA,” or Genders & Sexualities Alliance (GSA) Network clubs, which aims to “lead the charge for LGBTQ rights and social justice.” Formerly the “Gay-Straight Alliance,” the group renamed itself the Gender & Sexualities Alliances Network in 2015 to signal that its leaders “have moved beyond the labels of gay and straight, and the limits of a binary gender system.” GSA boasts of 4,000student-run clubs operated by 40 state chapters.

The GSA Network’s “Truth Nine Point Platform” calls for “the Abolition of the Police, ICE, Borders and the Judicial System”; “an End of the Cisgender Heterosexual Patriarchy”; “Reparations for all Indigenous and Black Peoples,” including “Indigenous reclamation of stolen lands”; and “free and non-compulsory education for all ages.”

“The manifesto was inspired by and builds upon the Black Panther Party’s Ten-Point Program, the Young Lord’s 12 Point Program and Platform, and the Third World Gay Revolution,” GSA Network states, as it promises “to bravely and ferociously fight for our communal liberation.” The Black Panther Party “advocated the use of violence and guerilla tactics to overthrow the U.S. government,” according to the FBI.

“We invite our comrades in struggle who align with our principles, including those who have yet to self-determine their relationship to the struggle, to join us in solidarity, coalition, and liberation — remembering the revolution is a relationship,” the GSA Network platform concludes.

SMYAL activists “connect with and provide assistance to teachers, staff, administrators, community members and partners to start and grow local GSAs,” according to its tax filings.

SMYAL Distributes Condoms, Gives LGBT Adults Access to Children without Parental Supervision

The first item listed on SMYAL’s “sexual health” program is “condom distribution.” SMYAL operates a “Peer Health Fellowship” for children ages 13-24: “Fellows serve their their [sic] schools and communities as health educators. Fellows serve their community as role models, leaders, and trusted friends by distributing condoms and safer-sex information,” according to the group’s most recent tax filings.

SMYAL operates numerous youth groups for children who identify as LGBT or “who are exploring or questioning their identities.” The youngest group, known as Little SMYAL, combines children from 6 to 12, although teens may opt to continue attending. The next level includes programs for children from early adolescence through their mid-20s.

“Little SMYAL’s is a group for queer and trans 6-12 year olds to provide young people a safe(r) space hang out [sic] and meet new people,” its website states. “To best meet the needs of our youth, we have programs that are designed for 6 to 9-year-olds (who we call Unicorns) or 10 to 13-year-olds (who we call Rainbows),” the group explains. “If your child is 13, they may choose to continue attending Little SMYALs programs or age up into SMYAL’s drop-in programs for youth ages 13+.”

“Some programs are open to all youth within this 13-24 age range,” SMYAL notes.

SMYAL actively seeks to separate children or adolescents from their parents, asking for access to young children without parental supervision. “We invite caregivers to attend a ‘Welcome to Little SMYALs’ session to make sure their child is ready to participate in future programming. We then encourage caregivers to give their child some space to allow them to meet new friends and participate fully in this environment,” SMYAL’s website states. “[S]ome parents/caregivers have enjoyed getting coffee down the street together during in-person programs.”

SMYAL also offers “clinical services to LGBTQ youth ages 6-24,” including “trauma-enforced yoga, sound healing, and mindfulness.” Its Youth Leadership Development program holds workshops on topics ranging from “allyship” to “gender and sexuality 101.”

‘Beyond Ridiculous’

Giving an anti-terrorism grant to a child-focused LGBTQ activist group is “beyond ridiculous,” Meg Kilgannon, senior fellow for Education Studies at Family Research Council, told The Washington Stand. “Anti-terrorism and violence prevention money from DHS is supposed to prevent another 9/11 bombing — actual violent terrorism. It’s not supposed to impose sexual ideologies on children or adults. That’s child abuse and taxpayer abuse.”

“When people say they want to close agencies like the FBI, CIA, or DHS, programs like this one are part of the reason for that sentiment,” she said.

The taxpayer-funded DHS grant will greatly enhance SYMAL’s budget. The $530,000 TVTP grant represents 15% of the $3.6 million in revenue the group reported in 2021. (In all $2,061,623 of its $3,632,170 came from government grants.) SYMAL spent $351,123 promoting the GSA Networks’ agenda. It also spent $350,363 on its Peer Health Fellowship and $302,248 on its Youth Leadership Development Program.

Awarding SMYAL and other politically polarizing organizations DHS grants shows that “the national security industrial complex is too big and too focused on perceived threats to government from American citizens rather than on actual national security threats: cyberattacks on public schools and other organizations; lawlessness at the border; child trafficking rings; drug trafficking rings — all with international ties,” Kilgannon said.

“It’s not the job of DHS to make people feel good about their own sex lives and enforce societal endorsement of sex acts,” she concluded.

AUTHOR

Ben Johnson

Ben Johnson is senior reporter and editor at The Washington Stand.

RELATED ARTICLES:

California to Create “Transgender History Month”

‘Public Education Needs to be a Site of Socialist Organizing’: ALA President

PEPFAR Is Subsidizing Abortion Advocacy, Say Lawmakers, Pro-Lifers, and African Leaders

Barna: Discipleship Is a Journey, Not a Destination

Why Every Christian Should Study the End Times

RELATED TWEET:

Meet DeDe Duffy. A preschool teacher in Cape Coral, FL. She says she teaches her students that if they don’t like their parents, they can find another family.

She also says she teaches them to be gay.

These are the people teaching your kids. pic.twitter.com/e5HJFzMOvD

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) September 11, 2023

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. ©2023 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

A Family Torn Apart: A Teen’s Descent into Horror thumbnail

A Family Torn Apart: A Teen’s Descent into Horror

By Martin Mawyer

A tragic story that will shock, sadden, and enrage. After being rescued by the FBI, rape victim Sage Blair was placed in solitary confinement by the Baltimore Juvenile Justice Center.


A devastated Virginia grandmother, Michele Blair, is suing the Appomattox County School Board and a Baltimore public defender, alleging they concealed information about her teenage daughter’s gender identity, a move she claims directly resulted in her daughter being kidnapped, trafficked and subjected to rape and torture.

According to the lawsuit, the school district didn’t notify Michele Blair, Sage’s adoptive mother, that her 14-year-old daughter was identifying as male at school, leading to Sage being bullied and sexually exploited.

Blair said Sage not only suffered schoolyard verbal and physical assaults but also a relentless series of rape threats from male classmates.

Alarmingly, despite this heightened level of bullying and the known threats of sexual violence, the school told Sage to use the boys’ bathroom, thus placing her in further danger.

Adding another layer to this profoundly troubling scenario, Blair had already notified the school Sage was going through mental health struggles, which included depression, eating disorders, self-harm, and hallucinations.

Despite knowing this information, the school encouraged Sage’s gender transition without notifying her mother, which Blair argues deprived her of her parental rights.

The harrowing tale continues as it is revealed that the school permitted the young teenager to change her name to Draco without her mom’s knowledge or consent.

The depth of the school’s secrecy only came to light when her mother stumbled upon a hall pass issued in Draco’s name.

The lawsuit, spearheaded by the Child & Parent Rights Campaign (CPRC) on behalf of Michele Blair, claims that the school’s actions infringed on Blair’s parental rights to guide her daughter’s upbringing.

The case has drawn considerable attention, with Vernadette Broyles, Blair’s legal representative from CPRC, shedding more light on the grim circumstances leading to Sage fleeing her home.

Broyles slammed the school for allowing Sage to use the boys’ bathroom despite knowing that the teenager had been receiving threats of sexual assault. This situation contributed to Sage’s decision to run away.

This desperate act tragically led her straight into the clutches of a waiting predator, who brutally violated her, trapping her in a horrifying web of sexual trafficking that spanned from Washington, D.C. to Maryland.

The narrative takes yet another dark and twisted turn. After being discovered and rescued by FBI agents in Maryland, where her horrific journey was expected to conclude, an unforeseen legal mire ensued.

According to the lawsuit, the Baltimore juvenile court system seized custody of the young girl, a move orchestrated by area public defender Aneesa Khan, and placed her in solitary confinement.

The suit alleges that Khan conjured a narrative portraying Sage’s parent as not “sufficiently affirming” her new identity, an assertion meant to paint a picture of parental abuse and neglect. This convinced a judge to grant the state guardianship over Sage.

And as if things couldn’t get any grimmer, the lawsuit depicts Sage’s time in state custody as an environment where the vulnerable teenager faced repeated sexual assaults, drug exposure, and a lack of necessary medical and mental health care.

In what must have been a relentless cycle of horror, the legal documents unveil that Sage, fearing for her safety in the male juvenile facility, made another desperate decision to run away.

Tragically, her escape led her directly into the clutches of a sex trafficker who spirited her away to Texas. There, the young girl endured an unspeakable series of atrocities – repeated rape, drug abuse, starvation, and torture, until law enforcement in Texas intervened, rescuing her from the nightmarish circumstances.

The lawsuit delineates this grueling sequence of events, adding that it was then that her mother was notified and Sage was brought back to the safety of her home in Virginia.

Upon her return, Sage embarked on a grueling journey towards recovery, involving intensive in-patient and outpatient therapy aimed at helping her process and come to terms with the relentless trauma she had encountered.

She has been medically diagnosed with complex PTSD, a severe mental health condition triggered by prolonged exposure to traumatic events.

Vernadette Broyles, representing the Blair family, squarely places the blame for Sage’s hellish odyssey on the school system’s failure.

Broyles vehemently contends that the core of the issue lies in the overreach of school officials, who, guided by their ideologies, neglected their boundaries and took it upon themselves to facilitate Sage’s transition without the knowledge or consent of her parents.

Broyles maintains that officials must be held accountable and respect parental involvement in decisions of such magnitude and impact on a child’s life.

The horrific unraveling of this saga is nothing short of the absolute disgrace and moral decay rotting at the core of our society.

Few could possibly fathom the staggering incompetence and mindless pursuit of destructive ideologies that have allowed such a heart-wrenching tragedy to unfold right under our noses,

This story is a damning testament to the grotesque distortion of values and principles that are tearing apart the very fabric of our civilization, using the innocents, the vulnerable as mere pawns in their sickening game.

You can almost hear the twisted machinations, the grinding gears of a bureaucratic nightmare that chose ideology over a young girl’s life, safety, and sanity.

How does this not send shivers down your spine?

It’s a cold, brutal, infuriating reminder that we are amidst a battle, fighting for the soul of our nation, where the lives of our children are tossed aside in the unholy name of ‘progress.’

This case shouts at us to wake up and reject this perilous path where the welfare of our children plays second fiddle to the distorted narratives spun by these ideologues.

It demands that we strip away the lies, tear down the facades, and expose the malevolent actors for who they truly are.

Let us not turn away. Let us not feign ignorance.

And mark my words, this battle is one we cannot afford to lose.

RELATED ARTICLE: Governor Youngkin Pardons Father Who was Arrested for Protesting School Board for Covering Up Sexual Assault of His Daughter at School

EDITORS NOTE: This Majority Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

States With Weaker Marijuana Laws See More Impaired Driving, Report Says

By Casey Harper

 A new report found that states with less restrictive marijuana policies have higher incidents of residents driving while high.

The Drug Free America Foundation released a new report showing that states that have legalized or weakened restrictions around high-THC marijuana, either for medical or recreational use, saw 32% more marijuana-impaired driving than states that have not adopted the same policies.

According to DFAF, the 18 states with less restrictive marijuana policies have seen far more cases of impaired driving of this kind, something that medical research shows can be very dangerous.

“In 2017, eight states had adopted full recreational marijuana programs (Alaska, California, Colorado, Maine, Massachusetts, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington) and ten states had enacted higher-THC medicinal programs (Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Minnesota, New York, Ohio, Rhode Island, and Vermont),” the report said. “Incidentally, seven of these states have since adopted full recreational programs. Adding to the concern is the fact that fatalities in the U.S. from marijuana-impaired drivers have risen dramatically between 2000.”

The report also points out that the potency of marijuana has skyrocketed in recent decades. This can lead to users taking in far more THC than they realize before getting behind the wheel.

“With these new products out there…especially with edibles and things, you might use one edible and not feel anything for the first 15 or 20 minutes, so next thing you know, you’ve eaten seven gummy bears or five cookies, and you don’t know when it’s going to hit you or how bad it’s going to hit you,” Amy Ronshausen, who leads DFAF, told The Center Square.

“And if that’s happening when you are behind the wheel of a car, that’s not a good thing,” she added.

Research from AAA and others has found that marijuana use significantly impairs drivers. On top of that, mixing alcohol and marijuana can create greater effects than either substance taken on its own.

“Research shows that marijuana can impair drivers in a variety of ways,” said AAA, which has conducted its own research backing this idea. “It can affect psychomotor functions such as attention, reaction time and coordination, but generally it appears to affect automated or routine driving more than tasks requiring conscious effort. Further, numerous laboratory-based studies have demonstrated that marijuana use impairs many aspects of cognitive and physical function that are necessary for safe driving.

“Marijuana can decrease car handling, can impair performance and attention while increasing reaction times, following distance and lane deviation,” AAA added.

Ronshausen said while most Americans are aware of the impact that alcohol can have on their driving, there is less awareness about the impact of marijuana.

“The general public, they see marijuana as somehow safer,” Ronshausen said. “We did a really good job at the ‘Don’t drink and drive’ message, but apparently we have not done as well of a job at the impaired driving message overall.

“You have a lot of people who haven’t really used marijuana since they were in college, and today’s marijuana is such a different product,” she added. “It’s such a higher potency. Like all drugs today, they are a higher potency and more pure…”

Ronshausen added people are often taking THC products that are far more potent than they realize.

“And there’s such a wide variety of products out there that do run the spectrum of potency, and with alcohol that’s more understandable,” she said. “You know that there’s going to be a difference between a glass of wine and Everclear, but when you are looking at these products, most people probably don’t look to see or even know, depending on how they are getting their product, what the potency is.”

Use among youth is also an issue.

“It is critical that these results impact future policy debates, especially since enforcement data shows that between 11 to 23 percent of recreational marijuana sold ends up in the hands of minors,” the DFAF report said. “On top of that, consumption lounges, now legal in seven states (Nevada, New Jersey, New York, New Mexico, Illinois, Colorado, and California), and drive-up pot shops will keep spurring increased occurrences of marijuana intoxication and driving.”

*****

This article was published by The Center Square and is reproduced with permission.

How To De-Queer Your Public School District thumbnail

How To De-Queer Your Public School District

By Dr. Rich Swier

“Education is a weapon whose effects depend on who holds it in his hands and at whom it is aimed.” — Joseph Stalin, General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.


Over time public schools in America have taken total control of the weapon called public education and have aimed it at parents and their children. It is now time for parents to take back control of public education and aim it at those who are bent on indoctrinating their children rather than teaching them reading, writing and arithmetic.

America’s educators must stop teaching our children what to think and focus on teaching our child how to think as free individuals.

If we don’t do this now then we will lose future generations and thereby lose our Constitutional Republic.

Today our public schools have been infiltrated by those pushing the LGBTQ, aka Queer, agenda in our classrooms. Parents are seeing pornographic books like “The Little Black – Queer In the 21st Century” in public school libraries and media centers, nationwide. Public schools have formed gay clubs such as the Gay, Lesbian, Straight Education Network (GLSEN).

Kevin Jennings is the founder of GLSEN and he also established, under the Obama administration, Gay-Straight Alliance clubs in Elementary and High Schools. Jennings is himself gay.

Jennings wrote the foreword for a book entitled Queering Elementary Education: Advancing the Dialogue about Sexualities and Schooling, which includes an essay that indicates that “‘queerly raised’ children are agents” who should employ “strategies of adaptation, negotiation, resistance, and subversion,” to others.

America’s Education Watch reported this about Kevin Jennings and GLSEN,

Parents who don’t ask the questions will be very surprised at the literature, books and information being used to educate their children about sex – all sex and at an early age.

Behind GLSEN’s promotion of “tolerance” and “safety,” however, are the sordid realities of what GLSEN actually supports. Just about every type of sexual practice imaginable is “celebrated” and even graphically described in first-person stories by students in GLSEN’s recommended literature.

GLSEN also supports gender distortion through cross-dressing, even in books recommended for elementary school children.

Criminal, underage sexual contact between adults and minors is a frequent, casual theme in these materials.

Planned Parenthood, a long-time GLSEN ally, brought enough kits for everyone at the 2005 event and laid them out on their table for all to take. Massachusetts News reported, “Out of approximately 650 attendees, about 400 of those were students.” 250 adults at a Planned Parenthood event out of 650 attendees? So I guess the wolf was supervising the event!

Watch this video about Obama’s “Safe Schools” czar Kevin Jennings who is a member of The North American Man/Boy Love Association or NAMBLA:

Most recently a Oklahoma Public School District promoted Dr. Shane Murnan, the 52-year-old principal of John Glenn Elementary School in southwestern Oklahoma City, who parades himself around as a “drag queen” named Shantel Mandalay, and was even crowned as this year’s Miss Oklahoma FFI, a drag queen event and has an arrest record for child pornography.

Today any parent who questions their public school board’s policies and politics have even been labeled as “domestic terrorists” by the U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona.

QUESTION: How can parents fight back and win?

De-Queer Public Schools

It is imperative that law abiding citizens take action to De-Queer our public school.

QUESTION: How can parents, grandparents and ordinary citizens De-Queer their public school district?

The answer is simple, make the School Boards, Superintendents, teachers and administrator follow the laws of the land.

What public school boards have done is deprived parents of their right under the color of law which is punishable under 18 USC § 242.

Those who, via public school policies, are in violation of the law can be brought to justice for their high crimes and misdemeanors.

This can be done by any citizen by simply asking their local District or State Attorney to empanel a Grand Jury to look into these violations of law and if found culpable then that person or persons, from the school board to the classroom, can be arrested, tried and if convicted fined and imprisoned.

Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law 18 USC § 242 reads:

Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

How to Take Action to Empanel a Grand Jury

We are providing the following letter with attachment that may, if you wish, be sent to any District or State Attorney by any parent or concerned citizen to De-Queer their public schools.

DRAFT LETTER:


LETTER HEAD

Date

FROM:      Name

Address

City, State Zip Code

TO:             District/State Attorney

Address

City, State Zip Code

RE: Request to empanel a Grand Jury to investigate and indict members of the __________ School Board, Superintendent, administration and teachers of High Crimes and Misdemeanors

Dear District/State Attorney _______,

Before entering your current office, you took the following oath:

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support, protect, and defend the U.S. Constitution and Government of the United States.

This letter is to apprise you of egregious violations against the U.S. Constitution of the United States of America by the _________ School Board, Superintendent, administration and teachers of High Crimes and Misdemeanors.

These violations include the crime of deprivation of rights under color of law as outlined in 18 USC § 242 which reads:

Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

We have attached a document that provides information on your authority and evidence sufficient to empanel a grand jury to convene and determine if it is reasonable to prosecute each of these criminal acts, including deprivation of rights under law of parents.

We ask that you do your duty to restore equal justice under the law and reinstate the American people’s confidence in the justice and judicial systems, by arresting and prosecuting these offenders, in what amounts to an unprecedented coup d’état and pernicious attack upon our Republic, the several States and the American People.

Kindly, advise your intentions.

Sincerely,

-Signed-

Appendix A: Attorney Brief – Constitutional Enforcement under The Supreme Law of The Land


It is now time for parents to control their of their child’s, or children’s, education.

©2023. Dr. Rich Swier, Ed.D. All rights reserved.

CHILD ABUSE: These Schools Across the U.S. Have Brought Back Mask Mandates thumbnail

CHILD ABUSE: These Schools Across the U.S. Have Brought Back Mask Mandates

By The Geller Report

Torturing children. Not to mention how harmful and dangerous masks are.

These Schools Across the US Have Brought Back Mask Mandates

By: Jack Phillips, The Epoch Times, September 7, 2023:

Amid a small increase in COVID-19 hospital admissions in recent days, a handful of schools and colleges across the United States have re-imposed mask mandates—or at least started recommending them.

In the most recent example, a school in Montgomery County, Maryland, announced it would mandate masking for at least 10 days after three students tested positive for the virus in one classroom. The masking rule applies to students, teachers, and other staff in the classroom, it said.

A letter posted by the Rosemary Hills School online said that KN95 masks have been distributed to students and teachers in the classroom. At-home rapid testing kits were also sent home.

Keep reading.

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

RELATED ARTICLES:

NIH Mask Study: Covid Masks Expose Wearers to Dangerous Levels of Toxic Compounds Linked to Seizures and Cancer

Torturing children

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Democrats Cut GOP Lawmaker’s Mic As He Cites Evidence Child Sex Changes Don’t Improve Mental Health thumbnail

Democrats Cut GOP Lawmaker’s Mic As He Cites Evidence Child Sex Changes Don’t Improve Mental Health

By The Daily Caller

The Democrat-controlled California State Assembly cut off the microphone of state assembly member James Gallagher during debate over a bill threatening the custody of parents who don’t “affirm” their kids.

The California legislature passed Friday AB 957, a bill requiring a judge to consider whether or not a parent “affirms” their child’s “gender identity” in a custody dispute. Democratic Sen. Scott Wiener and Democratic Assembly Member Lori Wilson introduced the bill in February.

“I wanna get this out there. It’s important that we know what the science and the information is saying. Even a recent follow up study in 2021 found that out of 139 participants, only 17 persisted in their gender identity, they were looking at young boys. One-hundred-twenty-two, 87%, went back to their biological sex. You can’t have a —”

Unbelievable! The California Democrat controlled legislature cut off a Republican lawmaker’s microphone when he presented real data about teens desisting.

He was speaking in opposition to #AB957, a bill which would force parents affirm their child’s perceived gender identity or… pic.twitter.com/G8c451De9e

— Jonathan Zachreson (@JZachreson) September 9, 2023

Gallagher was told his microphone was cut off due to a “time limit on speeches.”

“This bill, for purposes of this provision, would include a parent’s affirmation of the child’s gender identity or gender expression as part of the health, safety, and welfare of the child,” AB 957 reads.

Assembly member Joe Patterson pointed out during debate that the legislation unnecessarily complicated family situations.

“In California judges are already using their discretion. They already can use it, I have seen it. They already can do this right now. And so I am concerned that this is the state telling the courts to give special emphasis on this because they can already do ti. So when I look at that and I look at what I went through growing up — a very complicated family situation — I believe this is going to add more complication.”

AUTHOR

SARAH WEAVER

Social issues reporter.

RELATED ARTICLE: Judge Temporarily Halts School District From Requiring That Educators Inform Parents When Their Child Changes Pronouns

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

HELLSCAPE: Chicago’s O’Hare Airport Used As Migrant Shelter As Crisis Overwhelms City thumbnail

HELLSCAPE: Chicago’s O’Hare Airport Used As Migrant Shelter As Crisis Overwhelms City

By The Geller Report

Like a Scene from Mad Max Thanks to Chicago’s ‘Migrants’ Mayor


Democrats did this. They own it.

They’re burning this country down.

Chicago’s O’Hare Airport used as a migrant shelter as crisis overwhelms city: ‘Like a scene from Mad Max’
Reporter William Kelly says Brandon Johnson has become the ‘migrants’ mayor’

By Elizabeth Heckman Fox News, September 7, 2023:

Chicago reporter William Kelly joins ‘Fox & Friends’ to discuss the immigration crisis spreading across the country as more than 400 migrants are being housed at O’Hare International Airport.

Chicago leaders are facing backlash over hundreds of migrants being housed at O’Hare International Airport, one of the nation’s busiest airports.

Chicago reporter William Kelly joined “Fox & Friends” Thursday to discuss what the city has been experiencing as a result of the influx of migrants.

More than 400 migrants are reportedly being housed in a section of the airport, hidden from public view behind black curtains, up from 31 at the beginning of August.

Kelly said the airport is one of only 18 migrant shelters in Chicago and that homeless Americans are no longer allowed to stay at the airport. The city previously struggled with an influx of homeless people at the airport but initiated a crackdown earlier this year after then-Mayor Lori Lightfoot faced criticism.

“Mayor Johnson campaigned as the people’s mayor. Sadly, the people are telling me that he’s the migrants’ mayor,” said Kelly.

Kelly said he does not think the same security and background checks that Americans go through at airports apply to migrants. Meanwhile, the city continues to struggle with crime and to recover from the coronavirus lockdowns.

“There are millions upon millions of dollars being spent on this migrant crisis. Nobody knows where the money is going, or what it’s being spent on.”

Kelly said he has been unable to receive answers from the mayor.

“Sadly, Mayor Johnson must have taken Mayor Lightfoot’s course at Harvard on media relations, because he won’t answer my questions.”

Keep reading

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

RELATED ARTICLE: Chicago mayor ripped as immigration crisis hits major cities: ‘The migrants’ mayor’

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Weekend Read: What the Left Did to Our Country thumbnail

Weekend Read: What the Left Did to Our Country

By Victor Davis Hanson

Will their upheaval  succeed?

In the last 20 years, the Left has boasted that it has gained control of most of America institutions of power and influence—the corporate boardroom, media, Silicon Valley, Wall Street, the administrative state, academia, foundations, social media, entertainment, professional sports, and Hollywood.

With such support, between 2009-17, Barack Obama was empowered to transform the Democratic Party from its middle-class roots and class concerns into the party of the bicoastal rich and subsidized poor—obsessions with big money, race, a new intolerant green religion, and dividing the country into a binary of oppressors and oppressed.

The Obamas entered the presidency spouting the usual leftwing boilerplate (“spread the wealth,” “just downright mean country,” “get in their face,” “first time I’ve been proud of my country”) as upper-middle-class, former community activists, hurt that their genius and talents had not yet been sufficiently monetized.

After getting elected through temporarily pivoting to racial ecumenicalism and pseudo-calls for unity, they reverted to form and governed by dividing the country. And then the two left the White House as soon-to-be mansion living, mega-rich elites, cashing in on the fears they had inculcated over the prior eight years.

To push through the accompanying unpopular agendas of an open border, mandatory wind and solar energy, racial essentialism, and the weaponization of the state, Obama had begun demonizing his opponents and the country in general: America was an unexceptional place. Cops were racist. “Clingers” of the Midwest were hopelessly ignorant and prejudiced. Only fundamental socialist transformation could salvage a historically oppressive, immoral, and racist nation.

The people finally rebelled at such preposterousness. Obama lost his party some 1,400 local and state offices during his tenure, along with both houses of Congress. His presidency was characterized by his own polarizing mediocrity. His one legacy was Obamacare, the veritable destruction of the entire system of a once workable health insurance, of the hallowed doctor-patient relationship, and of former easy access to competent specialists.

Yet Obama’s unfufilled ambitions set the stage for the Biden administration—staffed heavily with Obama veterans—to complete the revolutionary transformation of the Democratic Party and country.

It was ironic that while Obama was acknowledged as young and charismatic, nonetheless a cognitively challenged, past plagiarist, fabulist, and utterly corrupt Joe Biden was far more effective in ramming through a socialist woke agenda and altering the very way Americans vote and conduct their legal system.

Stranger still, Biden accomplished this subversion of traditional America while debilitated and often mentally inert—along with being mired in a bribery and influence-peddling scandal that may ultimately confirm that he easily was the most corrupt president to hold office in U.S. history.

How was all this possible?

Covid had allowed the unwell Biden to run a surrogate campaign from his basement as he outsourced his politicking to a corrupt media.

Senility proved a godsend for Biden. His cognitive disabilities masked his newfound radicalism and long-accustomed incompetence. Unlike his past failed campaigns, the lockdowns allowed Biden to be rarely seen or heard—and thus as much liked in the abstract as he had previously been disliked in the concrete.

His handlers, the Obamas, and the Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren radical Democrats, saw Biden’s half-century pretense as a gladhander—good ole Joe Biden from Scranton—as the perfect delivery system to funnel their own otherwise-unpopular leftwing agendas. In sum, via the listless Biden, they sought to change the very way America used to work.

And what a revolution Biden’s puppeteers have unleashed in less than three years.

They launched a base attack on the American legal system. Supreme Court judges are libeled, their houses swarmed, and their lives threatened with impunity. The Left promised to pack the court or to ignore any decision it resents. The media runs hit pieces on any conservative justice deemed too influential. The prior Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer whipped up a mob outside the court’s doors, and threatened two justices by name. As Schumer presciently put it, they would soon “reap the whirlwind” of what they supposedly had sowed and thus would have no idea what was about to “hit” them.

Under the pretense of Covid fears, balloting went from 70 percent participation on election day in most states to a mere 30 percent. Yet the rates of properly rejected illegal or improper ballots often dived by a magnitude of ten.

Assaults now followed on hallowed processes, laws, customs, and institutions—the Senate filibuster, the 50-state union, the Electoral College, the nine-justice Supreme Court, Election Day, and voter IDs.

Under Biden, the revolution had institutionalized first-term impeachment, the trial of an ex-president while a private citizen, and the indictment of a chief political rival and ex-president on trumped up charges by local and federal prosecutors—all to destroy a political rival and alter the 2024 election cycle.

Biden destroyed the southern border—literally. Eight million entered illegally—no background checks, no green cards, no proof of vaccinations. America will be dealing with the consequences for decades. Mexico was delighted, receiving some $60 million in annual remittances, while the cartels were empowered to ship enough fentanyl to kill 100,000 Americans a year.

Modern monetary theory,” the Leftist absurdity that printing money ensures prosperity, followed. It has nearly bankrupted the country, unleashed wild inflation, and resulted in the highest interest rates in a quarter-century. Middle-class wages fell further behind as a doddering Biden praised his disastrous “Bidenomics.”

Biden warred on fossil fuels, cancelling federal leases and pipelines, jawboning lending agencies to defund fracking, demonizing state-of-the-art, clean-burning cars, and putting vast areas of oil- and gas-rich federals lands off-limits to drilling.

When gas prices predictably doubled under Biden and the 2022 midterms approached, he tried temporarily to lease out a few new fields, to drain the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, and to beg the Saudis, and our enemies, the Iranians, the Venezuelans, and the Russians, to pump more oil and gas that Biden himself would not. All this was a pathetic ruse to temporarily lower gas prices before the mid-term elections.

Biden abandoned Afghanistan, leaving the largest trove of military equipment behind in U.S. military history, along with thousands of loyal Afghans and pro-American contractors.

Biden insulted the parents of the 13 Marines blown up in this worst U.S. military debacle since Pearl Harbor. He lied to the parents of the dead that he too lost a son in the Iraq war, and when among them later impatiently checked his watch as he seemed bored with the commemoration of the fallen—and made no effort to hide his sense that the ceremony was tedious to him.

Vladimir Putin summed up the Afghan debacle—and Biden’s nonchalant remark that he wouldn’t react strongly to a “minor” invasion of Ukraine if it were minor—as a green light to invade Ukraine.

When Biden did awaken, his first reaction was an offer to fly the Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy out of the country as soon as possible. What has followed proved the greatest European killing ground since the 1944-45 Battle of the Bulge, albeit one that has now fossilized into a Verdun-like quagmire that is draining American military supply stocks and killing a half-million Ukrainians and Russians.

Suddenly, there are three genders, not two. Women’s sports have been wrecked by biological men competing as women, destroying a half-century of female athletic achievement. Young girls in locker rooms, co-eds in sororities, and women in prison must dress and shower with biological men transitioning to women by assertion.

There is no longer a commitment to free speech. The American Civil Liberties Union is a woke, intolerant group trying to ban free expression under the pretense of fighting “hate” speech and “disinformation.”

The Left has revived McCarthyite loyal oaths straight out of the 1950s, forcing professors, job applicants, and students applying for college to pledge their commitment to “diversity” as a requisite for hiring, admittance, or promotion. Diversity is our era’s version of the Jacobins’ “Cult of Reason.”

Race relations hit a 50-year nadir. Joe Biden has a long history of racist insults and putdowns. And now as apparent penance, he has reinvented himself as a reverse racial provocateur, spouting nonsense about white supremacy, exploiting shootings or hyping racial tensions to ensure that an increasingly disgusted black electorate does not leave the new Democratic Party.

The military has adopted wokeism, oblivious that it has eroded meritocracy in the ranks and slashed military recruitment. It is underfunded, wracked by internal suspicion, loss of morale and ginned up racial and gender animosity. Its supply stocks are drained. Arms productions is snail-like, and generalship is seen as a revolving door to corporate defense contractor board riches.

Big-city Democratic district attorneys subverted the criminal justice system, destroyed law enforcement deterrence, and unleashed a record crime wave. Did they wish to create anarchy as protest against the normal, or were they Jokerist nihilists who delighted in sowing ruin for ruin’s sake?

Radical racial activists, with Democrat endorsement, demand polarizing racial reparations. The louder the demands, the quieter they remain about smash-and-grab looting, carjacking, and the swarming of malls by disproportionally black teens—even as black-on-black urban murders reach record proportions.

In response, Biden tried to exploit the growing tensions by spouting lies that “white supremacy” and “white privilege” fuel such racial unrest—even as his ill-gotten gains, past record of racist demagoguery and resulting lucre and mansions appear the epitome of his own so-called white privilege.

This litany of disasters could be vastly expanded, but more interesting is the why of it all?

What we are witnessing seems to be utter nihilism. The border is not porous but nonexistent. Mass looting and carjackings are not poorly punished, but simply exempt from all and any consequences. Our downtowns are reduced to a Hobbesian “war of all against all,” where the strong dictate to the weak and the latter adjust as they must. The streets of our major cities in just a few years have become precivilizational—there are more human feces on the sidewalks of San Francisco than were in the gutters of Medieval London.

The FBI and DOJ are not simply wayward and weaponized, but corrupt and renegade. Apparently the perquisite now for an FBI director is the ability either to lie while under oath or better to mask such lying by claiming amnesia or ignorance.

Immigration is akin to the vast unchecked influxes of the late Roman Empire across the Danube and Rhine that helped to finish off a millennium-old civilization that had lost all confidence in its culture and thus had no need for borders.

In other words, the revolution is not so much political as anarchist. Nothing escapes it—not ceiling fans, not natural gas cooktops, not parents at school board meetings, not Christian bakeries, not champion female swimmers, not dutiful policemen, not hard-working oil drillers, not privates and corporals in the armed forces, not teens applying on their merits to college, not anyone, anywhere, anytime.

The operating principle is either to allow or to engineer things to become so atrocious in everyday American life—the inability to afford food and fuel, the inability to walk safely in daylight in our major cities, the inability to afford to drive as one pleases, the inability to obtain or pay back a high interest loan—that the government can absorb the private sector and begin regimenting the masses along elite dictates. The more the people tire of the leftist agenda, the more its architects furiously seek to implement it, hoping that their institutional and cultural control can do what  ballots cannot.

We could variously characterize their efforts as destroying the nation to save it, or burning it down to start over, or fundamentally transforming America into something never envisioned by the Founders.

Will their upheaval  succeed? All the levers of the power and money are on the side of the revolutionaries. The people are not. And they are starting to wake to the notion if they do not stop the madness in their midst they very soon won’t have a country.

*****

This article was published at American Greatness and is reproduced with permission.

TAKE ACTION

As we move through 2023 and into the next election cycle, The Prickly Pear will resume Take Action recommendations and information.

Covid Forever thumbnail

Covid Forever

By Auguste Meyrat

The elites dearly miss having a pandemic on hand.

Apparently, prescribing Ivermectin for people with Covid was fine all along. Sure, nearly every public authority vehemently denounced Ivermectin, calling it “horse dewormer,” and social media platforms censored people who dared mention it. And sure, they slandered medical experts like Dr. Peter McCullough and Dr. Robert Malone and even placed jaundiced filters on pictures of Joe Rogan, who credited Ivermectin for his quick recovery from Covid. But now, after some doctors are suing the FDA for all but banning an effective treatment for the coronavirus, FDA officials have claimed that their aggressive criticisms of the drug were “merely quips.”

When it comes to acknowledging the many blunders of the Covid response, none of this is surprising. Whether they were wrong about social distancinglockdownsmaskingtaking the jabnatural immunity, or finding the origins of the virus, the experts are oddly forgetful now of just how confident and belligerent they were at the time. In other cases, as with “public intellectual” Sam Harris, many leftists still maintain that imposing Covid vaccine mandates was justified because the virus could have been much worse—even though it wasn’t.

Fortunately for these hypocrites, most Americans today are tired of hearing about Covid. They don’t want to think about hysteria, the lies that were told, the rights that were stripped away, the friendships and families that were destroyed, the businesses that were shut down, or the many students who fell years behind in their learning. Not only is it painful to think about, but any attempt to rectify those mistakes seems futile. Everyone just wants to move on. As Emily Oster recommended in her infamous essay last year in The Atlantic, “We have to put these fights aside and declare a pandemic amnesty.”

However, as tempting as this thinking is, moving on and declaring a blanket amnesty won’t be possible until Americans face up to what happened during those dark days. Otherwise, history will repeat itself, the worst offenses will go unpunished, and worst of all, true healing won’t take place.

Although the worst of the pandemic is long gone, Covid is still making people sick. Many adults came down with pink eye and various flu symptoms earlier this summer. In all likelihood, these aren’t the usual seasonal ailments but are the newest strains of the Wuhan virus.

Of course, it’s always possible that a new virus could replace Covid. After all, SARS-CoV-2 was a synthetically designed virus that almost certainly came out of a bio lab conducting gain-of-function research. There are many such labs around the world, all of which carry the risk of inadvertently releasing another devastating virus. It’s not conspiracy kookery to seek accountability for the lab leak and demand that all labs conducting this research be defunded and shut down.

Moreover, the bad actors need to be punished. Thus far, none of the great liars who stoked hysteria demonized whole swaths of the country, pushed untested vaccines on the entire population, and crashed the economy have been held to account. They continue to command great respect and speak on issues of the day, and many of them are enjoying the fortunes they made because of the lockdowns and relentless propaganda. Even petty dictators like Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer, who devastated their states with lockdowns, suffered little to no backlash from voters.

This means that the same people who exploited Covid have every incentive to keep up their exploitation. Considering how richly they’ve been rewarded in the past, they’d be foolish to not try again.

And sure enough, yet a new variant of Covid has popped up this month, causing companies and municipalities to push masking again. We can expect yet another round of universal mail-in ballots, more “strong leadership” from the petty dictators, certain particularly weak candidates campaigning from their basements again, and the perfect catchall excuse for any and all crises that come up in the next year (“Covid did it!”).

But along with avoiding another pandemic and holding people accountable, Americans need to psychologically process Covid and the disastrous response to it. With so much damage done to so many people, resentment can fester and initiate a cycle of revenge. Communities become polarized to the point that neighbors live in different worlds, and politics become “weaponized,” a means of striking back at the other side rather than one of bringing people together. In some countries, this can look like a civil war; in America this looks like a two-tiered corrupt system of elites oppressing non-elites.

For the time being, it would be counterproductive to attempt wide-scale reconciliation. The people who wanted anti-vaxxers to die and believe in the power of a biomedical security state to keep them safe from sickness have no intention of repenting. Those who faced persecution for appealing to common sense are under no obligation to let bygones be bygones. For reconciliation to happen, one side would need to admit to the harm done, take steps to reform the system, and apologize; in turn, the other side would also admit the harm done, help with reform, and accept the apology.

Until this happens, the people who found themselves vilified, silenced, fired from their jobs, and even denied healthcare will have to take the steps of remembering the harm done and distancing themselves from the people who hurt them (or at the very least, stop voting for them). Although feelings of seeking revenge will surely surface, they cannot take over. Non-elites have no real way to take revenge on the ruling class which holds all the power, and even if it were possible, revenge would create more problems than it solves. Revenge will only exacerbate negative feelings, worsening the pain already inflicted and making it all-consuming.

If one is bleeding from a mortal wound, he first needs to accept the fact that he is bleeding, treat the wound, and then understand how this happened. Similarly, Americans need to accept that they suffered harm (instead of impulsively wishing it away), treat the problem directly with reasonable action and prudent judgment, and understand the problems that led to it. Only after this process occurs does it become possible to recover, and even forgive. The cycle of violence is finally broken.

Whatever people decide to do, simply pretending Covid never happened and thinking happy thoughts is not an option. Americans of all political stripes are hurting right now and at a high risk of going through the misery again. A deep collective reckoning on what has happened for the past three years is long past due. It may be unpleasant, but it’s the only way to truly move on and get to a better place.

*****

This article was published by The American Mind and is reproduced with permission.

TAKE ACTION

As we move through 2023 and into the next election cycle, The Prickly Pear will resume Take Action recommendations and information.

Getting Ivermectin from Walmart — NOT! thumbnail

Getting Ivermectin from Walmart — NOT!

By John Droz, Jr.

The Resistance to Science Continues to be Stunning.


I believe that preparation is wise. Considering that COVID-19 seems to be making somewhat of a comeback (even here), it seems advisable to have a science-based treatment on hand if either my wife or I get infected.

Based on my research of the early treatment options, it is unequivocal that Ivermectin (IVM) has the best safety and efficacy combination. [Note that when we got infected in 2021, we both took Ivermectin and were over COVID-19 within a few days.]

I contacted our very competent primary care physician (who is not a fan of IVM, but respects our research and choices) and asked for a prescription. At our request, he sent it to Walmart (which is the most convenient location for us during the Summer).

Two days later we received an automated phone call from Walmart saying that it was in and could be picked up. Then we got a phone call from our physician’s office. The nurse said that the Walmart pharmacist had called them and said that we should get Paxlovid instead. Our doctor said that we did not want Paxlovid but IVM. The pharmacist then responded that they would not fill our IVM prescription!

A few days later we were at Walmart getting some groceries. I went to their pharmacy and asked to speak to the pharmacist. When she came over I asked what the story was. She said that getting IVM for COVID-19 treatment was a bad idea.

I introduced myself as a scientist and a rather knowledgeable person regarding COVID-19 early treatment options. I asked her to please explain why using IVM for COVID-19 therapy was a bad idea. Instead, she said that she was not comfortable overruling another Walmart pharmacist’s decision. I asked her: Is it Walmart’s official position not to fill IVM prescriptions for COVID-19 treatment?

She said no, that it was up to each of their pharmacists to make the call. She then said that in NY pharmacists have the right to deny a legal prescription. (She did not give me a citation, but here is an article about that. Note that there are rules about controlled substances or religious objections — but neither of these apply here.)

NY does require that a pharmacist who denies a legal prescription must forward that prescription to another nearby pharmacy. She did do that and told me that she believed that this other pharmacy would fill my prescription. (I had not used this other pharmacy as their GoodRX IVM cost was twice Walmart’s, and we do not have prescription insurance.)

I thanked her for that and said let’s get back to why this is a bad idea. Correct me if I’m wrong, but there are two main considerations for selecting a treatment drug: safety and effectiveness. She agreed and said that IVM was not safe.

I politely stated that the WHO has categorized IVM as one of the safest drugs ever (see here). She shrugged. (I was prepared to go into more detail about IVM safety (e.g., hereherehere, and here) but she didn’t argue with my WHO assertion.

I said IVM is likely safer than aspirin. She said that aspirin isn’t all that safe. I responded: Yet a consumer can buy an unlimited amount of aspirin from Walmart, no questions asked. Why aren’t you objecting to that? She shrugged again.

She said that the FDA page clearly was against IVM. I said yes but the title is very deceptive. If you carefully read the text, it is more saying that it is unsafe to use veterinary-grade drugs or to self-prescribe IVM. A recent addition also now says “If your health care provider writes you an IVM prescription, fill it through a legitimate source such as a pharmacy, and take it exactly as prescribed.” We are doing what the FDA is saying, right? She had no answer.

Since they were advocating Paxlovid, I asked if she had read the FDA’s EUA Fact Sheet for it regarding safety? Her answer was No. I pointed out that there were TEN (10) PAGES of “Established and Other Potentially Significant Drug Interactions”! Her response was “I’m not a fan of Paxlovid, but it is what the FDA is endorsing.”

Having made a good case for IVM safety — and getting no specific scientific evidence to the contrary — I decided to move on to the effectiveness part. Since I anticipated some resistance, I had printed out a one-page comparison of the scientific studies about early treatment test results for IVM and Paxlovid. I tried to hand it to her but she wouldn’t take it…

She said that there were three pharmacists at this Walmart and that it was a group decision to refuse to fill this prescription. (I noted that this statement contradicted what she said before that our denial was one other pharmacist’s decision.)

showed her that there were some hundred scientific studies about IVM and that the bottom line result is that IVM has 62% early treatment effectiveness. Compare that to what they (and the FDA) were endorsing, Paxlovid, which has 32% early treatment effectiveness. She said some of the IVM tests were rigged.

I said, OK let’s look at just the peer-reviewed early-treatment IVM studies. In that subset, IVM has 61% effectiveness, and Paxlovid has 36% effectiveness. She shrugged yet again. I said: Wouldn’t peer review eliminate most sketchy studies? Isn’t that the point of it? She said peer review can be manipulated. Hmmm.

I said yes, but in this case, why? No one would financially benefit. She said that there was a right-wing conspiracy. She then asked me why the FDA would be biased against IVM? I said because the FDA is being unduly influenced by the pharmaceutical industry — which can make no profit from selling a drug like IVM whose patent has expired. She said that she was no fan of Big Pharma. I said good!

I summarized my case by saying that IVM is unquestionably safer than Paxlovid, with a much more exhaustive safety profile (due to some 4 billion human doses to date). That left effectiveness as the only issue.

She and her associate were questioning the IVM effectiveness despite dozens of scientific studies (including RCTs, and peer-reviewed) that concluded that IVM was MUCH more effective for early treatment of COVID than Paxlovid. She offered no scientific evidence that favored Paxlovid.

Further, their Walmart pharmacy fills off-label legal prescriptions all the time — and do not require that the consumers or their doctor provide scientific studies to prove safety and effectiveness. Why here? (No answer.)

The worst case here is that my wife and I would be taking a placebo. We don’t believe that is the situation, but if it is, why does that rise to the level where Walmart pharmacists are refusing to fill our legal prescription? (No answer.)

She reiterated that when NYS pharmacists choose not to fill a legal prescription, NYS requires them to pass on the prescription to another pharmacy that would fill it, and that is what she had done. I thanked her for doing that.

I again handed her my page of information, plus my business card. This time she took it. We ended on a cordial note, which was my objective.

IMO this story is about whether some medical professionals are acting in the public’s best interest, or are they instead protecting their interests? Draw your own conclusions. I’m hopeful that this IVM lawsuit against the FDA will expose that.

PS — These are likely the same people who say that we should accept what the consensus of scientists say about Climate. Here the consensus of scientific studies says that IVM is safe and effective for COVID — so different rules apply here?

©2023. John Droz, Jr. All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Problem of Remdesivir Vs. Ivermectin solved

‘Extremely Dangerous’: Biden Regime’s Push To Swap Science for ‘Indigenous Knowledge’

As Drug Addictions Rise, Biden Admin Moves to Reclassify Marijuana as ‘Low-Risk’ thumbnail

As Drug Addictions Rise, Biden Admin Moves to Reclassify Marijuana as ‘Low-Risk’

By Family Research Council

On August 30, reports surfaced that the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) will review a recommendation from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to reclassify marijuana as a lower-risk Schedule III drug. Experts warn that because of marijuana’s proven track record of being used as a gateway drug to highly addictive narcotics such as fentanyl, the move could lead to increased drug addiction and abuse nationwide.

The move by the Biden administration is the latest in a sustained effort to decriminalize cannabis, which currently remains a prohibited Schedule I drug at the federal level due to its psychoactive (mind-altering) effect and lack of any FDA-approved medicinal purposes. In October of last year, President Biden pardoned thousands of people who were convicted of marijuana possession as a federal offense.

Over the last two decades, a decisive legal shift regarding marijuana has occurred as more and more states have relaxed their laws governing the drug. Twenty-three states now allow for the recreational use of cannabis, and an additional 14 states allow the drug to be used for medical purposes.

With the increased allowance of the drug has come increased usage. A study published last year found that in states where marijuana was legal for recreational use, people used the drug 20% more frequently than those in states where it remained illegal.

In addition, studies show that new, highly potent forms of cannabis with higher concentrations of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) are becoming increasingly common worldwide and are causing an increase in addictions. In the U.S., three in 10 marijuana users are addicted to the drug. In Europe, a drug monitoring center “found a 76% rise in people entering treatment for cannabis addiction over the past decade.”

Dr. John Fleming, a medical doctor who served in the Navy and ran his own private practice in Louisiana, has done extensive research on the effects that marijuana has on the human body. During Tuesday’s edition of “Washington Watch with Tony Perkins,” he pointed out that cannabis has proven to be a gateway drug for far more potent and dangerous drugs.

“The NIH and other agencies within the federal government show that the younger people [are who] use marijuana or any drug that’s illicit or addicting, the more likely they’re going to become addicted one day to … a pharmacological pool of drugs,” he explained. “Those who become addicted usually are addicted to three or four drugs simultaneously, and alcohol as well.”

Fleming continued, “Obviously, after they reach a certain level of ‘benefit’ in terms of what makes them feel good and gives them euphoria through their neurotransmitters, they’re ready to move on to other drugs. And as they get older, they step up to harder and harder drugs as they go along.”

Fleming, who formerly served in the Trump administration and as a Republican congressman representing Louisiana’s 4th congressional district, went on to highlight a variety of adverse health effects that can occur from marijuana use.

“[P]eople who smoke it experience the same problems that tobacco [users do], only worse. They see four times the number of bipolar disorders. … [T]hree out of 10 — in one study — of schizophrenics began with using marijuana. … And now we’re seeing that women who smoke it are more likely to have fetal abnormalities, premature labor, infant mortality, maternal mortality.”

In addition, those who regularly use marijuana are more than twice as likely to consider suicide, suffer from increased anxiety, suffer from a reduced capacity to learn, suffer from premature aging of the brain, experience cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (CHS) which causes severe vomiting, have an increased risk of heart attack, have an increased risk of bronchitis, emphysema, and lung damage, are 22% more likely to visit the ER, and are 40% more likely to die by the age of 60.

Fleming concluded by arguing that Biden’s effort to reschedule cannabis as a low-risk drug is based on politics instead of concern for public health.

“I believe this move to [reschedule marijuana] is to get votes by Biden. I think it’s pretty obvious what he’s trying to achieve there.”

AUTHOR

Dan Hart

Dan Hart is senior editor at The Washington Stand.

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2023 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

‘Just Live Your Life’: Experts Say Biden Admin Distorting COVID Data as Scare Tactic thumbnail

‘Just Live Your Life’: Experts Say Biden Admin Distorting COVID Data as Scare Tactic

By Family Research Council

As health experts downgraded the danger of the latest COVID variant, news broke Sunday that the Biden administration hid government data from the public in 2021 showing that COVID cases among vaccinated seniors was spiking. Medical experts and lawmakers say that the Biden administration is continuing its pattern of distorting and concealing scientific evidence and data surrounding the virus for political gain and societal control.

On Wednesday, Dr. Eric Topol, a professor and executive vice president of Scripps Research, told USA Today that the latest “Pirola” COVID variant has “been downgraded from a hurricane to not even a tropical storm.” The latest data on COVID fatalities confirm Topol’s assessment, with The New York Times reporting that the number of deaths due to COVID in August stood at 600 per week, which was 4% of the 14,000 deaths that occurred weekly in August 2021.

Meanwhile, the White House appears to be ramping up COVID precautions at a time when most Americans have moved on from pandemic-era practices such as masking and social distancing. After First Lady Jill Biden contracted COVID last week, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre announced that President Biden would be following CDC recommendations by “masking in this 10-day period.” But Biden apparently flouted the recommendations during a ceremony at the White House on Wednesday.

Still, businesses, schools, and hospitals appear to be taking their cues on masking from former Biden administration official Dr. Anthony Fauci, as a number of them have reinstated mask mandates. On Saturday, the former White House COVID czar stated that he is “concerned that people will not abide by” likely future CDC recommendations to wear masks in public again. Although Fauci said that “the CDC does not mandate anything,” Dr. Marc Siegel, a clinical professor of medicine at NYU Langone Medical Center, pointed out that “the agency’s recommendations have frequently led to state, local, and business mandates.”

major, “gold standard” study released in February on the effectiveness of masking found that “wearing a mask may make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu-like illness/COVID-like illness … and probably makes little or no difference in how many people have flu/COVID confirmed by a laboratory test.”

The seeming disconnect between government policy and scientific evidence, as well as concerns over basic civil liberties, are leading lawmakers to respond. On Thursday, Senator J.D. Vance (R-Ohio) introduced legislation to forbid mask mandates on planes, public transit, and schools over the next 15 months.

Observers are also noting that data on masking is far from the only COVID-related scientific evidence that the Biden administration is ignoring. On Sunday, The Epoch Times reported that data compiled by the U.S. military in 2021 showing that fully vaccinated seniors were experiencing high rates of breakthrough cases of the virus was not only hidden from the public, but also from health officials within government agencies like the FDA.

“[T]hat story is really shocking,” remarked Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, an epidemiologist and professor of medicine at Stanford University, on Wednesday’s edition of “Washington Watch with Tony Perkins.” “[T]he CDC had information from an analysis of Medicare data … that the vaccine was waning efficacy in September 2021. That meant that there were a large number of seniors that were relatively unprotected by the Delta wave that was hitting the South back then in 2021. It was right around that same time the Biden administration pulled the allocation of monoclonal antibodies to the American South, claiming that they wanted to save it for later. A lot of people died as a consequence of that hidden information.”

Bhattacharya continued, “If the CDC had shared that information more broadly, then we might have been able to protect those older people during that deadly Delta wave. … And the reason [the information wasn’t shared] was very simple. They thought that if they told people, people would stop taking the vaccine. But scientific data like that are a public good. You don’t use it for propaganda purposes. You use it to tell people true things so that people can make good decisions.”

Bhattacharya went on to lament that the Biden administration has not appeared to learn any lessons from the initial response to the pandemic.

“[U]nfortunately, it just seems like we are trying to make the same mistakes again,” he observed. “I think with mask mandates, with essentially recommending boosters before we actually have high quality randomized data, ignoring the fact that the population has very broad … immunity thanks to recovery from COVID. … I think that the idea that what failed before will work now is an amazing thing to me. Science normally learns from its mistakes. … [Y]ou make a mistake and you change your hypothesis and then you test that next hypothesis. Here what we see is the opposite of that, where it seems like we’re just doomed to repeat ourselves over and over again.”

Bhattacharya further called for an official government commission to be held in order to assess America’s response to the pandemic.

“[W]hat hasn’t happened is an official inquiry, kind of like a 9/11 Commission,” he explained. “The goal isn’t to blame anybody. The goal is to learn lessons from what went wrong so we don’t do it again. I wrote something called the Norfolk Group document, along with seven other scientists where we lay out an agenda for an honest COVID commission. [We] deserve answers on vaccine efficacy and side effects, on mask efficacy, on lockdowns, lockdown harms, school closures, why immunity after COVID recovery with natural immunity was ignored. … And yet there doesn’t seem to be any official interest on the part of the Biden administration to actually conduct such an inquiry.”

As to his advice for the American public going forward, Bhattacharya was candid.

“I think for most people, just live your life,” he emphasized. “… [I]mmunity is an honest to God real thing. … [J]ust live your life and don’t worry so much. Now, if you are older or [are] vulnerable in other ways, go talk to your doctor. … But the point is that we should not be treating COVID as something around which we reorganize our entire life. We should instead be treating COVID as something that’s manageable.”

AUTHOR

Dan Hart

Dan Hart is senior editor at The Washington Stand.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Problem of Remdesivir Vs. Ivermectin solved

Keep Calm and Treat COVID as Seriously as President Biden

Democrat Blocks Senate Bill To Ban Mask Mandates Nationwide

Precedented: Tommy Tuberville Isn’t the First to Hold Up Military Promotions

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2023 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

Mayor Adams Warns That Illegal Immigration ‘Will Destroy’ NYC thumbnail

Mayor Adams Warns That Illegal Immigration ‘Will Destroy’ NYC

By Discover The Networks

During a townhall on the Upper West Side on Wednesday, a visibly frustrated Mayor Eric Adams (D) warned that illegal immigration, at its current pace, “will destroy New York City” and that “every service in this city” will have to be cut and that migrants will “come to your neighborhoods.”

“Let me tell you something New Yorkers: Never in my life have I had a problem that I did not see an ending to. I don’t see an ending to this. I don’t see an ending to this. This issue will destroy New York City, destroy New York City. We’re getting 10,000 migrants a month,” Adams said:

One time we were just getting Venezuela, now we’re getting Ecuador, now we’re getting Russian-speaking coming through Mexico, now we’re getting Western Africa, now we’re getting people from all over the globe have made their minds up that they’re going to come through the southern part of the border and come into New York City. [Emphasis added]

And everyone is saying, ‘It’s New York City’s problem.’ Every community in this city is going to be impacted. We have a $12 billion deficit that we’re going to have to cut every service in this city is going to be impacted. All of us.

Adams said no New York City neighborhoods, from Staten Island to Queens, will be spared from illegal immigration.

“It’s going to come to your neighborhoods. All of us are going to be impacted by this,” Adams said. “I said it last year when we had 15,000. I’m telling you now with 110,000. The city we knew, we’re about to lose.”

Very true, and whose fault is that? It is the fault of Eric Adams’ party — the pro-crime party of open borders and sanctuary cities, the party that prioritizes illegal aliens over America’s own citizens.


Eric Adams

10 Known Connections

  • Spent much of his professional career trying to expose what he viewed as widespread police racism
  • Strong supporter of Nation Of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan
  • Co-founded 100 Blacks in Law Enforcement Who Care in 1995
  • Referred to his white former colleagues at the NYPD as “crackers” in 2019
  • Signed a 2022 bill allowing up to 1 million noncitizens living in NYC to vote in local political elections

To learn more about Eric Adams, click here.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Jones: Dems Worried Presidency Too High-Stress for Aging Biden

Fetterman Dares GOP to Impeach Biden: ‘Go Ahead, I Dare You’

Masking Up Again: Dem Markey Blocks ‘Freedom to Breathe’ Act

EDITORS NOTE: This Discover the Networks column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Important Information for the Public and Victims of Remdesivir thumbnail

Important Information for the Public and Victims of Remdesivir

By Carolyn Blakeman

This column is about the Remdesivir, aka Veklury, class action. Everyone should read it and help even if you think it does not apply to you.


To the Healthcare workers please stay strong, we are working on settlements every day. Watch for updates.

To media: please help us spread this information.

To everyone else, please take the time to read and forward this column.

Reminds me of a quick story:

One day I was in the car with my son who was twenty-one at the time. A dangerous occurrence happened on the roadway where we were. I said to my son, ‘should I call 911? I bet many others already did.’ He turned to me and said, ‘mom, you need to call. Too often people assume someone else made the call then no one calls, and someone gets hurt when it could have been prevented.’ Think of my son’s words when you get to the bottom of this column.

Thank you in advance.

Many of you know that Jill Myer and I began our legal careers representing union members for all their needs under their legal benefit plans. We originally met in law school and then we both found that we loved doing Adoption matters. For more than 20 years we helped people complete their families through private adoption. The most rewarding work I have ever done. Until now….

As a domestic adoption attorney in NY our firm made a living, but we were never rich. We never asked for donations, instead we donated if the situation called for us to reduce our fees. We love hearing updates from families. In fact, I could write for hours telling stories that would make you laugh and cry, but mostly make you feel joy.

For the past two plus years I have found myself helping with many other causes. I became a part of a team of attorneys who seek the removal of Remdesivir aka Veklury from use by any institution i.e., hospital, doctor, nurse, clinic etc. This team has worked, without pay, on a Complaint which we believe will survive the Prep Act and could yield the results we seek and save lives. To date we have more than one thousand plaintiffs and we know that number will be in the thousands when we file. We have raised close to $70,000. The class action will cost at least $1 million dollars if it does not settle before a trial. Our team has agreed to file the case if we reach the goal of $200,000.

This is an Urgent Call to Action so that we do not miss the opportunity to file this life-saving case. Some of our causes of action are coming close to their Statute of Limitations. It would be tragic and a shame if we cannot file because we passed the deadline.

Many attorneys are scared to go up against big Pharma. I do not blame them. It scares me too! That is why our team spreads out across the country. After listening to so many horror stories, we as a team cannot sit back and be complacent. If this has not affected you, please know this can happen to anyone. Remdesivir and Veklury are still being used for in and outpatient care. It is a death sentence. Listen to some of the testimonials on the Former Feds website (chbmp.org)

No donation is too large or too small. Please share this. It is not political. This case will help everyone. If each plaintiff could donate $100 each, we could file tomorrow. We need justice and we need to save lives.

Jamie Scher

Please click here to go to a page where you can donate to GiveSendGo or purchase a medical alert bracelet or donate directly at www.MyerandScher.com

Thank you in advance from the Leaders of the team throughout the country: Jamie Scher, Stephen Scher, Sheldon Karasik, Melissa Jacobs, David D’alia. You will also be helping Former Feds Group, Dan Watkins, Michael Hamilton and so many more attorneys throughout the country who are helping survivors and families of victims.

©2923. Carolyn Blakeman. All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLE: US Nursing home data shows clearly that the COVID vaccines were a disaster for the elderly; they increased the risk of dying from COVID

‘Horrified’ Hospital Employee Leaks DEI Training pushing 3-YEAR-OLDS Identifying as ‘Transgender’ thumbnail

‘Horrified’ Hospital Employee Leaks DEI Training pushing 3-YEAR-OLDS Identifying as ‘Transgender’

By The Geller Report

Mengele medicine.

The hospital needs money, and this is their solution.

‘Horrified’ hospital employee leaks DEI training pushing 3-year-olds identifying as transgender

‘Many transgender people have ALWAYS known their true gender,’ the DEI training from Kaiser Permanente said

By Hannah Grossman Fox News, September 4, 2023:

A “horrified” hospital employee at Kaiser Permanente leaked a sex change training for diversity, equity and inclusion, which promoted the idea that a 3-year-old can be transgender.

“The employee, who wishes to remain anonymous for fear of losing her job, was horrified,” according to the Wednesday report from Libs of TikTok.

As part of the hospital system’s DEI training, medical employees were expected to watch a video with children explaining they knew they were transgender at age 3 and 4.

“Many transgender people have ALWAYS known their true gender,” the video said

Kaiser Permanente training promotes transgender 3 and 4-year-olds. (Adobe Stock)

“My name is Rose. I’m a transgender girl. I was born a boy, but I always knew that I was a girl,” a child said.

Rose’s dad then explained the child would write notes to Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy asking to be turned into a girl.

An adult trans-identified man said, “When I was 3, I decided that I was going to be a father and marry Janet Jackson.”

A mom proceeded to explain how her trans child, Elie, was “a girl in her heart and brain” by age 4.

Read full article.

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

RELTATED ARTICLES:

President Biden Proposes Employers Pay for the Abortions of Their Employees

HORROR: Study Indicates Thousands of Minors Have Undergone Gender Surgery

Largest organization of OB-GYNs in America accepted $11 million from HHS to promote COVID-19 vaccines to PREGNANT WOMEN

The De-Civilization of America | Victor Davis Hanson

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Largest organization of OB-GYNs in America accepted $11 million from HHS to promote COVID-19 vaccines to PREGNANT WOMEN thumbnail

Largest organization of OB-GYNs in America accepted $11 million from HHS to promote COVID-19 vaccines to PREGNANT WOMEN

By The Geller Report

Demons.

Largest organization of OB-GYNs in America accepted $11 million from HHS to promote COVID-19 vaccines to PREGNANT WOMEN

By Arsenio Toledo, CDC News, August 23, 2023:

Documents obtained through Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests reveal that the main professional organization of obstetricians and gynecologists (OB-GYNs) in the United States accepted over $11 million in taxpayer money to promote the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines and claim that they are safe for pregnant women and their unborn children.

This is according to fetal-maternal medicine specialist Dr. James Thorp, who conducted an investigation into the massive damage the mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines are doing to women, especially to those who are pregnant and their unborn children.

In an interview with COVID-19 vaccine expert and Big Pharma critic Dr. Naomi Wolf, Thorp laid out how the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) created what he called a “covenant of death” with the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) – the largest professional organization for OB-GYNs in the United States and the rest of the Americas – in exchange for $11 million.

“What’s in this covenant of death? … They took well over $11 million. They signed the covenant with death, and they’re not allowed to deviate one iota from the lethal narrative of HHS. If they do, they will be liable for paying back every single penny, which they’ve already pocketed,” said Thorp.

Thorp and Wolf noted that the contract uncovered by the FOIA requests provided for the return of the money to the HHS if ACOG did not adhere to the government’s “‘safe and effective’ for pregnant women and new moms script presented to them” by the federal government.

He added that ACOG is not the only professional medical association to have accepted money from the government. Other recipients of government funding in exchange for promoting the COVID-19 vaccines include the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine.

“[These organizations], to this day, are the evil organizations that perpetrated this crime on the world,” said Thorp.

“Doctors who treat the most vulnerable population in the world – pregnant women and their unborn babies – have been and are coerced to lie by organizations that oversee these doctors, that were paid to lie,” remarked Wolf. “At least one primary goal, of all this madness and evil of the past three years, whatever brand you chose, was to ruin women’s menses and to damage human reproduction at a global level. Team Pfizer or Team Moderna? A distinction without a difference.” (Related: If your doctor told you to get “vaccinated” for COVID, they were BRIBED, evidence shows.)

$13 billion in funding redirected to “influencers” to promote COVID-19 vaccines

In addition to the approximately $11 million provided by the government to ACOG, Thorp noted that his FOIA investigations – launched with the help of his wife, attorney Maggie Thorp – revealed that $13 billion in taxpayer money went to fund “influencers” to promote the mRNA vaccines.

Most of this $13 billion went to a variety of individuals and organizations. Notable are the organizations like ACOG that focus on medicine for pregnant women, such as the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the main medical certification board for practicing obstetricians and gynecologists in the U.S. and Canada, and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, an NGO.

According to Thorp, there are about 300 major organizations and influencers – including religious institutions like synagogues and churches – that accepted money from the HHS and the CDC in a “psyops campaign … to convince the United States and the entire world that this deadly shot was safe, effective and necessary in the most vulnerable population – pregnant women.”

Read full article.

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Are We Facing Lockdowns 2.0? thumbnail

Are We Facing Lockdowns 2.0?

By Jeffrey Tucker

National Public Radio was in a frenzy this morning but it felt like the movie Groundhog Day: they were spreading tremendous alarm about the rise of Covid cases. We have to stop the spread, the announcer said, and that’s why masks are coming back to classrooms. However, they added, relief is on the way in the form of a new vaccine.

Rinse, repeat – as the shampoo bottles say.

This line of thinking – stop the spread to reduce strain on hospitals, mask up, and so on – is being echoed by all major media organs. Leading the way is of course the New York Times. 

I’m a bit superstitious about stories in the New York Times designed to drum up disease panic. It was February 28, 2020, when this paper threw out one hundred years of editorial policy on infectious disease to counsel panic over calm, thus paving the way for what would come two weeks later: the astonishing wreckage of Covid lockdowns and everything that entailed.

There was a reason the Times was chosen to be the first media outlet to take this line on Covid. It would be exceedingly naive to think that this was driven by an independent editorial judgment. Someone likely put them up to it.

Regardless, I knew that day that the darkness was falling, that this was likely the beginning of a grand experiment in public health that would not only fail to achieve its aims but also wreck American liberty and prosperity. After all, sectors of the ruling class had been gaming pandemics for twenty years. They needed to justify the endless hours and billions put into the grand project of pandemic planning.

The result was a calamity without precedent. We are nowhere near recovered. Substantial numbers of people today fear lockdowns far more than Covid, and for very good reasons. It was the crisis of our lives.

Even more striking, we’ve yet to have a reckoning. The people in charge today are the same people who did this or their direct successors. There have been no apologies but rather quite the reverse. They worked hard to codify lockdowns as the preferred policy for pandemics, and we have every reason to suspect that they will repeat the experience if they can get away with it.

That’s why my heart jumped a beat at the above-the-fold headline in the Times yesterday morning.

This happens at the same time we are getting more reports of new mask mandates, school closures, and the rollout of a new Covid vaccine invented by the usual suspects that President Biden has personally suggested that every American take. From all appearances, it does seem like another lockdown could be coming, or perhaps they are just trying to scare us into the reminder that they can do it if they want to.

Just this morning, the White House spokesman took to the lectern to warn Americans about ominous subvariant BA.2.86, not to be confused with all the other subvariants being tracked in a pseudoscientific track-and-trace operation being run by the usual suspects.

The Washington Post was chosen to announce the terror behind this one. “While only about a dozen cases of the new BA.2.86 variants have been reported worldwide — including three in the United States — experts say this variant requires intense monitoring and vigilance that many of its predecessors did not. That’s because it has even greater potential to escape the antibodies that protect people from getting sick, even if you’ve recently been infected or vaccinated.”

You will notice that BA.2.86 is not on the current list. That only means it could be the worst yet, whatever that means.

It will surely be added. And no doubt every commentator on TV in the coming months will have great expertise with all this coded gibberish, spouting off these letters and numbers like they are known friends while the rest of us stare at our screen in amazement at the flashy science these experts are tossing around.

Our pro-lockdown friend and Pfizer board member Scott Gottlieb is already at it, letting all these subvariant names roll off his tongue on CNN and thus display his astonishing mastery over the microbial kingdom.

This could be the way in which Lockdown 2.0 will be different from 1.0. The last time, the main spokespeople like Deborah Birx spoke to us like children to make sure we got the message. The downside of that approach is that it invites regular people to comment on the wisdom of lockdowns.

The next time around, they will be much more sciency about it, with all this talk of subvariants, R-naughts, hospitalization rates, wastewater examinations, and so on, and do so in ways that intimidate regular people into thinking our opinions cannot possibly matter much. 

Let’s take a closer look at this New York Times piece.

“But for Americans who have become accustomed to feeling that the nation has moved beyond Covid,” the newspaper says, “the current wave could be a rude reminder that the emerging New Normal is not a world without the virus.”

Are we really continuing to imagine the goal of eradication still? That seemed to be the purpose of the lockdowns in the first place, if there was any goal at all. It’s utterly impossible to create a world in which there are no viruses. And actually, such a world would be stunningly dangerous, for it is the presence of pathogens that themselves train the immune system in the art of resistance, same as exercise makes the body more healthy.

Sadly, this was the great taboo subject for three years, and, as a result, there was almost no talk of natural immunity during the last Covid mania. And there has been little to no reckoning since those days about the meaning of endemicity, the failure to recommend repurposed drugs as therapeutics, and the positive contribution of widespread exposure to creating the public health benefit of stronger immune systems. All of these topics were denounced and then censored. Oddly, they still are.

To this day, public health officials continue to pretend that they did everything right. Oh sure, they could have locked down earlier, forced masks earlier, and imposed vaccine mandates with much more ferocity. So far as they are concerned, this was their only failing. And they have no intention of making those supposed mistakes again.

In my own circles, everyone believes that they will never get away with it all again simply because there is too much resistance. I’m not so optimistic actually. Let’s say that 20 percent of the population is still convinced of the entire Covid religion. These people working with media and Big Tech, combined with daily propaganda from Covid, might be enough to overcome a large portion of the public that swears they will not comply this time.

Honestly, I never believed they would get away with it the first time. How in the world do you convince Catholic Bishops to demand the closure of Churches on Easter under the excuse of the widespread circulation of a virus with a 99-plus percent survival rate in which the verified deaths from Covid alone is centered on a population older than life expectancy itself? I never could have imagined such a thing would be possible.

But the desire on the part of aspirational professionals – in academia, industry, and religion – to stay out of trouble and continue to ascend the ranks is so powerful as to cause multitudes to bury their best instincts for what they imagine will be a temporary but prudent compliance. I do not for a moment believe that bravery on the level of the Amish or the Hasidim is widespread enough in the population to create a mass resistance movement.

“Some institutions have responded to the recent increase in Covid infections by reinstating pandemic-era rules,” writes the Times. Then the article proceeds to celebrate all the cases of pandemic restrictions, without a hint that these didn’t work last time and won’t work this time either. Again, there has been no reckoning, which only increases the likelihood of a new round of lockdowns.

Lockdowns were the most successful state/corporate policy in world history for convincing the population to give up volition, liberty, and money to the biomedical cartels and all their associated parts. 

Every government benefitted and so did all the biggest companies, particularly the digital ones that had been working for a leg up and a big win from the great reset. Something that is this monstrously successful for them becomes a model for the future, which they try and try until the population gets utterly and completely sick of it, as they did with the religious wars of old.

Until that day comes, lockdowns will be an ever-present threat.

*****

This article was published by the Brownstone Institute and is reproduced with permission.

TAKE ACTION

As we move through 2023 and into the next election cycle, The Prickly Pear will resume Take Action recommendations and information.

‘FDA Is Not a Physician’: Appeals Court Sides With Doctors on Ivermectin for COVID-19 thumbnail

‘FDA Is Not a Physician’: Appeals Court Sides With Doctors on Ivermectin for COVID-19

By The Geller Report

The Democrat regime went so far as to ban Ivermectin from pharmacies. During the height of the pandemic, you couldn’t get Ivermectin in NYC. I know, I called every one of them trying to get the much needed medicine to sick friends. That’s how evil these demons are.

When I challenged a big pharmacy in Times Square, asking them to explain the unconscionable decision to not carry Ivermectin, the pharmacist said, ‘I agree with you. It’s not in our hands.’

I found one pharmacy …… in Harlem.

The Food and Drug Administration is not a physician, so it had no business cautioning people not to take ivermectin to ward off Covid-19 infections with social media posts stating, “You are not a horse,” the Fifth Circuit said.

By: Cameron Langford, Courthouse News, September 1, 2023

A box of ivermectin is seen in a Georgia pharmacy in September 2021. (AP Photo/Mike Stewart)

(CN) —Three doctors who prescribed ivermectin for Covid-19 patients have valid claims that the Food and Drug Administration overstepped its authority with a campaign warning people not to take the drug, a Fifth Circuit panel ruled Friday, reinstating the trio’s lawsuit against the agency.

Drs. Robert Apter and Mary Talley Bowden say between them they have treated or consulted more than 9,000 Covid patients and they each have a patient survival rate of more than 99%, despite regularly prescribing them ivermectin off-label to treat the respiratory illness.

But the doctors say pharmacies stopped filling their prescriptions for the drug — which the FDA approved in 1996 for human use to treat parasitic diseases caused by round worms and black flies — after the FDA launched a public relations campaign in spring 2021 sounding the alarm that people were being hospitalized after self-medicating with large doses of the drug intended for deworming livestock that they had purchased over the counter.

The FDA also sent letters to the Federation of State Medical Boards and National Association of Boards of Pharmacy warning against the use of ivermectin to treat Covid-19 with a link to an agency advisory that said taking it in high dosages is dangerous.

Apter and Talley Bowden, along with Dr. Paul Marik, sued the FDA, the Department of Health and Human Services and the agencies’ leaders in Galveston federal court in June 2022. They claimed the FDA had exceeded its authority and violated the Administrative Procedure Act by interfering with their practice of medicine — regulation of which, they contended, falls to states.

The FDA’s campaign, coupled with their advocacy of ivermectin, caused them problems: A major Houston hospital system forced Talley Bowden to resign her privileges; Apter was referred to physician regulatory boards of Arizona and Washington state for discipline; Marik was forced to resign from his post at Eastern Virginia Medical School, where he was a medical professor and chief of pulmonary and critical care.

Marik had developed a Covid-19 management protocol for the university and added ivermectin after finding it was effective treating the illness, especially in the early stages of infection.

After U.S. District Judge Jeffrey Brown dismissed their lawsuit, finding their allegations could not overcome the government’s sovereign immunity, they appealed to the Fifth Circuit.

A three-judge panel of the New Orleans-based appellate court heard arguments last month.

A Justice Department attorney told the panel the FDA “has to be able to make these kinds of public safety statements” about risky uses of drugs, an argument the judges rejected Friday.

Writing for the unanimous panel, U.S. Circuit Judge Don Willett, a Donald Trump appointee, focused on three FDA’s social media posts about ivermectin, in which the agency gave the impression the drug is only meant for horses and cows.

The posts stated: “You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, ya’ll. Stop it,” “You are not a horse. Stop it with the #ivermectin. It’s not authorized for treating #COVID,” and, “Hold your horses, ya’ll. Ivermectin may be trending, but it still isn’t authorized or approved to treat COVID-19.”

Numerous media outlets published stories about the warnings. But Willett says a key point was lost in the uproar.

“Left unmentioned in most of the messaging: ivermectin also comes in a human version. And while the human version of ivermectin is not FDA-approved to treat the coronavirus, some people were using it off-label for that purpose,” he wrote in the 24-page opinion.

Willett found the Administrative Procedure Act allows the three doctors to bypass the government’s sovereign immunity and assert claims that the two defendant agencies and their top officials acted beyond their authority.

“FDA is not a physician,” Willett wrote in conclusion. “It has authority to inform, announce, and apprise—but not to endorse, denounce or advise. The doctors have plausibly alleged that FDA’s posts fell on the wrong side of the line between telling about and telling to. … Even tweet-sized doses of personalized medical advice are beyond FDA’s statutory authority.” (Emphasis in original.)

The panel — rounded out by U.S. Circuit Judges Edith B. Clement, a George H.W. Bush appointee, and Jennifer W. Elrod, a George W. Bush appointee — reversed dismissal of the lawsuit and remanded it to Brown for further proceedings.

Neither the plaintiffs’ attorney nor the Justice Department responded late Friday to emails seeking comment on the order.

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.