Memory and Identity thumbnail

Memory and Identity

By The Catholic Thing

Francis X. Maier: We live in a time in which America’s future is at risk by methodically undermining the nature of the family, the memory of our culture, and the founding spirit of our nation . . . in other words, the things that anchor our identity as a free people.


The strip of Pennsylvania that meanders along the Delaware River is soaked in American history.  Quakers founded our borough of Yardley in 1682.  Washington crossed the Delaware just five miles north of our home.  Trenton, where the Hessians had such a bad morning after Christmas in 1776, and not just from hangovers, is a 10-minute ride from our driveway.  Princeton battleground in New Jersey is just another 15 minutes away, at most.  So our area is thick with reminders of the Revolution.

These weeks of early summer from Memorial Day (May) through Flag Day (June) to Independence Day (July) are redolent of patriotic zeal.  At our parish, after our Mass celebrating Pentecost, the congregation sang “America the Beautiful.” The voices were full-throated and sincere. The next day, on Memorial Day, we watched the town parade from the VFW post at the end of our block, along with hundreds of neighbors who lined the street.

Local parades can be Raggedy Ann affairs; long on enthusiasm, short on glamor.  But watching Korean and Vietnam War veterans salute the colors as if they were 20-somethings again, eyes filled with memory and emotion, while re-enactors in Revolutionary War garb march past with their fifes and drums. . .well, it’s a window on something sacred.  A thread weaving together generations.

Again and again, men have consecrated America’s virtues and best ideals on the battlefield.  They’ve done it with their blood.  And that leaves the rest of us with two obligations: gratitude; and the work of sustaining the best of the nation for which they sacrificed.

I mention all this to frame what follows.

A Catholic friend, a former officer and combat veteran whose sons also saw combat for this country, sent me the following email recently:

Historically, I’ve always defined myself as a “conservative,” i.e., committed to conserving this country’s founding values of God, family, country.  Those values today are despised and under assault by many of our most powerful institutions, including elite higher education, much of the media, the tech industry, and even the financial industry, including banks and money managers. Many corporations are intimidated by the tyranny of DEI and other “social scores” — think China — and as a result, they’re supporting an anti-family, anti-American agenda.

The speed of this change is breathtaking, and its permanence is unknown, especially given the on-going weaponization of the FBI, CIA, the judicial system, and other organs of state.  I still believe that most of the woke agenda lacks support from a majority of Americans.  But it succeeds through zealous advocates who’ve mastered the use of threats to manipulate individuals and institutions.

The recent behavior of the retail giant Target is insightful for its vulnerability to LGBTQ and transgender pressure.  I suspect many corporations have confused the energy and tactics of the trans community for massive public support.  I think Target’s behavior is repugnant to most people, but it may be true that it’s ”good for business.”  It may also be true that quite a few Americans have been frightened into passive acceptance.  The recent Target and Bud Light controversies may be a defining moment for the success or failure of woke tactics. I’m praying that it will be a watershed that brings back some common sense.

Two things are notable about the email: its obvious frustration, and an undercurrent of misgiving.  Did my friend risk his own life in battle, and lead his sons to risk theirs, to serve “God, family, country,” or merely another generous helping of destructive sex and what’s “good for business”?  It’s the kind of question my wife and I have asked ourselves.  We supported our eldest son when he was accepted at West Point. We were proud of the time he spent there.  Our feelings today are far more ambivalent.

In his book Memory and Identity, John Paul II noted that the nation, like the family, is one of humanity’s “natural” societies, and not the product of mere convention.  Neither family nor nation can be replaced by anything else.  Therefore a proper “patriotism is a love for everything to do with our native land: its history, its traditions, its language, its natural features. . . .Every danger that threatens the overall good of our native land becomes an occasion to demonstrate this love.”

Yet at the same time, while acknowledging John Paul’s wisdom, Charles Chaput warned that “A nation can become so corrupt and Babylon-like that it’s not worth defending, and America is no exception.”

The two statements are not incompatible.

Chaput went on to stress that it’s “proper, and important, for Americans to express gratitude for our democratic institutions. . . .[They’re] a remarkably durable design of government of which we ought to be proud, and to which we ought to be loyal.”  But that gratitude and loyalty must be earned by

a healthy society [that] respects and sustains the past, teaching children its history, and weaving together the generations. . . .The historical illiteracy of recent decades widens the conflicts between generations.  It also blinds us to the subtle — and more recently, crudely violent — transformations and erosions taking place in our political structures.  In many ways this illiteracy is far more perilous than any gap that separates different groups in a pluralistic society.

We live in a time that very much “threatens the overall good of our native land,” methodically undermining the nature of the family; the memory of our culture; and the founding spirit of our nation . . . in other words, the things that anchor our identity as a free people.  Many of the mouths that so easily accuse others of “racism,” “fascism” and “hate” are possessed by the same kind of venomous instincts themselves.

I suppose the lesson is this.  We need to remember and revere those who died for the founding beliefs and best ideals of America.  And as Christians, we need to live in a way that restores them in the nation’s heart.

You may also enjoy:

Russell Shaw’s The American Church, Going, Going . . .

Robert Royal’s Of Witness and the Only True Safety

AUTHOR

Francis X. Maier

Francis X. Maier is a senior fellow in Catholic studies at the Ethics and Public Policy Center.

EDITORS NOTE: This Catholic Thing column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. © 2023 The Catholic Thing. All rights reserved. For reprint rights, write to: info@frinstitute.org. The Catholic Thing is a forum for intelligent Catholic commentary. Opinions expressed by writers are solely their own.

10 Things for Christians to Remember during Pride Month thumbnail

10 Things for Christians to Remember during Pride Month

By Family Research Council

We all know it’s coming and in various ways we are bracing for it. You’ll be navigating workplaces, city streets, social media feeds, and corporate events celebrating it. The first thing to understand is that “Pride month” does not mean the same thing to everyone.

For many, Pride month is seen as a month of inclusivity and tolerance where people are seen and reminded that they matter. In significant ways, these are values that Christians share. But there’s so much more to it.

The message of Pride is not that you matter because you are created in the image of God, a message Christians not only agree with but started. No, Pride is a declaration of independence against nature and nature’s God. It is a claim that we can do whatever we want and no one can stop us. Live your truth. Live authentically.

In addition, for many, the symbolism has come to represent oppression, intolerance, and hate. The rainbow flag, which has now become much more than a rainbow, represents a movement that is pushing speech codes, that has closed businesses, and harassed people because they did not share a commitment to the sexual revolution or would not affirm that men can become women and get pregnant.

It’s interesting that Pride month falls right in the middle of Memorial Day and the Fourth of July. On Memorial Day, we celebrate those who gave their lives for our freedom. On the Fourth of July, we celebrate our independence from tyranny and those who pledged their lives, fortunes, and sacred honor so we could live as free people. Our nation, and those who died for it, get one day. But the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence get an entire month. If that doesn’t seem right, it’s not.

But let’s not get angry or panic. How do we think soberly, act biblically, and maintain our joy as we wade through this month-long celebration of sin?

Here are a few things to remember.

1. Pride celebrations are not new.

Although pride parades down the streets of America’s cities are a relatively recent development, people making a declaration of independence from God is so old it is almost cliché.

In the Garden of Eden, God told Adam and Eve not to eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil (Genesis 2:16-17; 3:2-3). However, Eve, with Satan’s help, convinced herself that doing things her way would help her become like God. Perhaps she decided she was spiritual, not religious.

She observed that the tree was good for food, that it was a delight to the eyes, and that it was desirable to make one wise (Genesis 3:6). She convinced herself that her rebellion would not be rebellion at all but virtue. She had followed the old rules long enough and found them to be stifling of her individuality. She was ready to chart a new path and live her truth and even convinced her husband to join her celebration. They may have even felt a sense of pride as they freed themselves from the bondage of God’s rules.

Basically, Adam and Eve started these parades and we’ve all participated in various ways and with varying degrees of enthusiasm.

2. You can love the way God wants you to or the way the world wants you to, but not both.

Much will be said about love this month. T-shirts, memes, and parade signs will declare that “love is love” and that “love wins.” Whether Christians can agree with these sentiments depends on how “love” is defined. Proponents of the sexual revolution would have us believe that we show love for someone by affirming identities, indulging desires, and encouraging each other to “live your truth.” But God’s definition of love is very different.

Scripture reminds us that “Love is patient and kind; love does not envy or boast; it is not arrogant or rude. It does not insist on its own way; it is not irritable or resentful” (1 Corinthians 13:4-5). But then it goes on to remind us that love “does not rejoice at wrongdoing, but rejoices with the truth” (1 Corinthians 13:6). This crucial verse is where God’s understanding of love and the world’s understanding of love diverge. God’s love forbids the celebration of things God does not celebrate. The world’s understanding of love requires it.

This means that a Christian’s unwillingness to celebrate Pride month will be seen by the world as an act of hate and by God as an act of love. Christians must choose whose definition of love they will accept.

3. No one is beyond the love or reach of Jesus.

While Christians are right to separate themselves from celebrations of sin, we should be equally careful to avoid a different but equally bad kind of pride — self-righteousness. If Christians have any goodness within ourselves, we do not deserve the credit. After all, “[God] saved us, not because of works done by us in righteousness, but according to his own mercy, by the washing of regeneration and renewal of the Holy Spirit” (Titus 3:5).

Rather than a sense of self-righteousness, Jesus modeled how our hearts should respond to people who are lost:

“When he saw the crowds, he had compassion for them, because they were harassed and helpless, like sheep without a shepherd. Then he said to his disciples, ‘The harvest is plentiful, but the laborers are few; therefore pray earnestly to the Lord of the harvest to send out laborers into his harvest’” (Matthew 9:36-38).

When we see crowds who are lost, we should be moved to compassion, not self-righteousness.

4. Don’t be afraid.

This month, some will encounter a city street lined with rainbow flags or unwittingly expose their child to sexual revolutionary propaganda on “Blues Clues” and be prone to despair. Don’t despair.

Fear is never from God. (2 Timothy 1:7). Whatever situation you are dealing with, God is not surprised by it, nor is it beyond His control. However, He knows we are prone to worry, which is why Peter encourages us to cast all our anxieties on him (1 Peter 5:7). The same God who formed the mountains and put the planets into orbit is aware of the situation and handling it.

The good news is that our moments of weakness are the moments God does His best work in us. While the culture takes pride in their independence from God, we should boast in our dependence:

“But he said to me, ‘My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness.’ Therefore I will boast all the more gladly of my weaknesses, so that the power of Christ may rest upon me” (2 Corinthians 12:9).

Maybe we should start our own pride parade; it would be kind of the same but also very different.

5. Being a Christian is supposed to feel weird.

One of the challenges of Pride month is that Christians often feel different. Most of us would prefer not to feel different. We want to blend in and be noticed only for how nice we are to people. But when someone at work is going from office to office asking people if they want a rainbow sticker for their window, the only way to blend in is to conform. So now you feel different.

But that’s how it’s supposed to feel. This is not our home. “Dear friends, I urge you, as aliens and strangers in the world, to abstain from sinful desires, which war against your soul” (1 Peter 2:11). We aren’t supposed to do or love the same things as the world around us. “Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him” (1 John 2:15). If being a Christian makes you feel different than other people, good. You are different. The real problem would be if you never felt different.

6. Don’t give an inch.

It’s possible to avoid feeling different, just do what everyone else is doing. Just provide your preferred pronouns or tolerate a rainbow flag in your office window. Other times, all you must do is keep your mouth shut. But don’t do it. The path of compromise only seems easy, but it’s not. After all, “The fear of man is a snare. But whoever trusts in the Lord is kept safe” (Proverbs 29:25).

It’s easy to rationalize seemingly small compromises. All Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego needed to do to avoid being thrown into a furnace was bow (Daniel 3). Surely, God would understand that they weren’t actually worshipping the idol. Right? They could have easily told themselves they needed to stay alive and maintain a good relationship with the king who had shown them so much trust. After all, God couldn’t use them if they were dead. But remember, it’s not you who is going to do the work, it’s God. God did change the heart of the King, but he did not use their influence, he used their obedience. Give Him your obedience.

7. Remember what you’re saying “YES” to.

During Pride month, Christians are required to say no to some things. We can’t participate in sin (Ephesians 5:11) nor can we celebrate evil (1 Corinthians 13:6). So you may be accused of being “anti” everything. These are moments it’s helpful to remember that anytime you say “no” to one thing its because you’re saying “yes” to something else. Something better.

When we say “no” to doing whatever you want sexually, it’s because we are saying “yes” to virtue, discipline, delayed gratification, and the satisfaction and intimacy that comes from forming relationships God’s way. When we say “no” to the idea that boys can become girls, we are saying “yes” to finding our created purpose. When we say “no” to surrogacy so that a child can be placed with two dads, it’s because we are saying “yes” to each child being known and loved by both their parents. When we say “no” to bad ideas, it’s because we’re saying “yes” to better ideas. Every time.

8. Pray for those who curse you.

One reason Christians shouldn’t be surprised when we are misunderstood or mistreated is because Jesus spent significant time telling us what to do when it happens. “Bless those who curse you, pray for those who abuse you” (Luke 6:28). Our responsibility is not to avoid every conflict, but to respond to it correctly when it happens.

That means we have to pray for those who treat us poorly. “But to you who are listening I say: Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you” (Luke 6:27). Praying for those who treat us poorly helps us love people, even if they don’t love us back. “For if you love those who love you, what reward do you have? Do not even the tax collectors do the same?” (Matthew 5:46) This is the goal of every day of every month. Pride month changes nothing, it just gives us more opportunities to love people the way Jesus does.

9. Pride comes before a fall.

It’s ironic that those who started “Pride” events used the term “pride” to describe them. They named their entire movement after one of the seven deadly sins; a sin that Proverbs assures us is the prelude to our destruction: “Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall” (Proverbs 16:18). It is almost as if God was looking to make it obvious what was actually happening here. Just as we would be wise to avoid celebrating “Wrath Month” or a “Lust Parade,” Christians should be wary of celebrating pride. After all, we know what happens next.

10. God will have the last word.

In Daniel chapter 5, Belshazzar, the king of Babylon, throws a party while an invading army is gathering around the city. He was so confident that the walls that had protected him his whole life would continue to protect him that he mocked an invading army by inviting his military to party rather than prepare for battle. Belshazzar was very confident, or at least he wanted to project confidence. Then God interrupted his party.

In a scene that gives us the phrase “the writing on the wall” the hand of God showed up and wrote a message on the wall. The interesting thing about the message is that Belshazzar was not able to read it, after all, he summoned Daniel to interpret it for him. Nevertheless, “the king’s face grew pale, and his thoughts alarmed him; and his hip joints went slack, and his knees began knocking together.” What we see here is what happens when fake power meets real power. The world is filled with people who have some form of cultural or political power, but when they are confronted with real power, their confidence disappears immediately.

Pride month is fake power celebrating its fake power, and it will survive only until God decides He has had enough. And that moment is coming. Our job is to make sure we’re doing what we can to remind people where the real power is and that opposing Him will never be a good decision — which is the opposite of pride.

AUTHOR

Joseph Backholm

Joseph Backholm is Senior Fellow for Biblical Worldview and Strategic Engagement at Family Research Council.

RELATED TWEET:

Did the Police just arrest a Christian Man for Quoting the Bible at PA Pride Event?!?!

Can anyone confirm this?! The AMERICA you grew up in no longer exists!!! pic.twitter.com/EAaDNQ3Dd8

— Graham Allen (@GrahamAllen_1) June 6, 2023

RELATED ARTICLES:

Suspended Coach and Daughter Reinstated after Protesting Boys in the Girls’ Locker Room

Louisiana Senate Resuscitates Stop Harming Our Kids Act

Why the Newest Horror Movie ‘Nefarious’ Is One of the Clearest Presentations of the Gospel Hollywood Has Ever Seen

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2023 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

GOP Rep Calls Abortion the Fruit of the ‘Church of Satan,’ Loses His Leadership Position thumbnail

GOP Rep Calls Abortion the Fruit of the ‘Church of Satan,’ Loses His Leadership Position

By Family Research Council

A pro-life Republican state representative lost his leadership position for saying that abortion is the fruit of the “Church of Satan.”

North Carolina State Representative Keith Kidwell (R-Beaufort) responded to a Democratic representative who tried to justify her decision to have an elective abortion by citing her church membership and belief in the “power of God.”

The exchange came during the General Assembly’s debate over whether to override the veto by Governor Roy Cooper (D) of a bill to protect most unborn babies from abortion beginning at 12 weeks.

State Rep. Diamond Staton-Williams (D-Cabarrus) said she and her husband decided to abort their third child “after much consideration, thought, and, of course, prayer.”

She did not say whether she had an abortion before or after 12 weeks. Yet she said the bill would remove a “God-given right.”

She then implied her Christian faith endorsed her decision to have an abortion. “I am someone who has grown up in the church and believes in the power of God. I know that I go through trials and tribulations. I know we all will,” said Staton-Williams. “And I know that, ultimately, I have been given the freedom of mind to make decisions for myself.”

Rep. Kidwell reportedly said privately to another Republican on the floor that any church that supports abortion sounds like the “Church of Satan.”

The Satanic Temple does, in fact, teach that “The Satanic Abortion Ritual” is “a sacrament which surrounds and includes the abortive act.” The rival Church of Satan, founded by Anton LaVey, eschews the term “sacrament” but declares that abortion “should be within the rights of the pregnant person.”

“I think it’s using the Lord’s Name in vain to say you would make a decision to have an abortion as a result of prayer,” North Carolina Values Coalition Executive Director Tammi Fitzgerald — who was in the chamber when the exchange took place — told The Washington Stand. Lawmakers should only present their stand as biblical “if it conforms with Scripture.”

The Bible proclaims a life-affirming message and has been consistently interpreted to prohibit abortion for 2,000 years by both traditional Christianity and Judaism.

Invoking her childhood church membership seems “an apparent attempt to shield herself from criticism” for embracing harmful policies, David Closson, director of the Center for Biblical Worldview at Family Research Council, told The Washington Stand. He noted that Staton-Williams has also “touted her progressive views on LGBTQ issues,” such as membership in an LGBT pressure group’s “Electeds for Equality,” a group of politicians “who publicly align themselves with the larger movement for LGBTQ” political power.

“Let’s be clear what is happening here: The representative is cloaking anti-biblical views, positions that directly contradict the Bible’s clear teaching, into religious-sounding language in an attempt to find a middle way. But there is no middle way when it comes to these issues. You are either on the side of Scripture or against it,” Closson told TWS.

Democrats have increasingly attempted to shroud their support for abortion-on-demand and LGBTQ issues in religious rhetoric. U.S. Senator Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.), who calls himself a “pro-choice pastor,” has said, “I think that human agency and freedom is consistent with my views as a minister.” The Bible tells Christians, “Live as people who are free, not using your freedom as a cover-up for evil, but living as servants of God” (I Peter 2:16).

Other Democrats regularly speak of abortion-on-demand only in religious language. “The right to have an abortion is sacred,” said New York Attorney General Letitia James (D) last June. “The right to an abortion is non-negotiable. Reproductive freedom is sacred,” said the Twitter account of Senator John Fetterman (D-Pa.).

But “the Bible’s teaching on life, marriage, and sexuality is straightforward, and no attempt to find a middle way on these issues will ultimately prove successful,” Closson told TWS.

House leaders proved more successful in leveraging outrage over Kidwell’s comments to wrench him out of House leadership. “To challenge a person’s religion when they share a deeply personal story … that is beneath the dignity of this House, and that is beneath the dignity of any elected office,” fumed House Minority Leader Robert Reives (D).

House Majority Leader John Bell (R) asked Kidwell to resign his leadership position as deputy majority whip, and Kidwell complied.

Yet Bell’s decision did not mollify local Democrats, who demanded Kidwell step down from office altogether. Dare County Democratic Party Chair Susan Sawin said Kidwell’s belief that Christianity does not endorse abortion renders him “unfit to serve.” Kidwell, one of the founders of the state’s House Freedom Caucus, has regularly drubbed his Democratic opponents at the polls, carrying more than 60% of his district in both of his elections.

After Staton-Williams’s comments, the Republican-controlled legislature voted to overturn Cooper’s veto of the life-protecting bill, which the Democrat vetoed at a massive outdoor rally on May 13, the day before Mother’s Day. Republicans needed exactly 60% of the total vote to uphold the Care for Women, Children and Families Act (S.B. 20). The GOP held exactly that margin — 72 out of 120 members of the General Assembly and 30 out of 50 senators — after Rep. Tricia Cotham (R-Charlotte) switched parties in April. Both chambers enacted the pro-life protections by overriding Cooper’s veto on May 16 in separate, party-line votes.

“I’d just like to thank the heroic efforts of Republicans in the House and Senate of finding common ground and passing historic legislation that will save thousands of unborn babies. It was no less than a miracle that they were able to pass a bill,” Fitzgerald told TWS.

Yet the dueling narratives and continuing fallout over the debate “reminds us that worldview is always just beneath the surface of the day’s headlines,” Closson concluded.

AUTHOR

Ben Johnson

Ben Johnson is senior reporter and editor at The Washington Stand.

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2023 Family Research Council. 


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

Armed With Quran, an AK-47 and 6 Magazines, Jihadi Murders Three Israeli Soldiers thumbnail

Armed With Quran, an AK-47 and 6 Magazines, Jihadi Murders Three Israeli Soldiers

By The Geller Report

It’s a religious war commanded by Islamic text and teachings. But the enemedia will move heaven and earth to keep that absolute truth from the public.

Islamic Jew-hatred is a central tenet of Islam.

More details come out about Egypt border attack: Quran found on terrorist

The terrorist who killed three IDF soldiers on the Egyptian border was carrying a Quran, knife, and six magazines.

By: Israel National News Jun 4, 2023:

New details are coming out about the attack on the Egyptian border early Saturday morning, which left three IDF soldiers, Ori Yitzhak Illouz, Lia Bin-Nun, and Ohad Dahan, dead.

Among the items the terrorist had on his person was a Quran, which may be a sign that he had become radicalized. The IDF estimates that that drove him to carry out the attack.

Galei Tzahal reported that a knife was found on the terrorist, with which he cut the zip ties that held the gate he entered closed. He was also found to have six weapon magazines, showing that the attack was well-planned.

Maariv published details about the terrorist’s plan of action: he walked a distance of about six kilometers (approx. 3.7 miles) from the installment where he was based, climbed a cliff, and arrived at the border fence while carrying a backpack full of gear. Using one of the knives in his possession, he opened a gate on the fence, which was meant to be opened quickly and was closed using only a zip tie, and approached the soldiers who did not notice him.

At this point, the terrorist opened fire at them and killed Lia Bin-Nun and Ori Yitzhak Illouz. The soldiers at the guard post were shot at around 6:00 AM, while the last time they were heard from was shortly after 4:00. A few minutes before 9:00 that morning, the platoon commander arrived to switch shifts and discovered the gruesome scene.

It was also found that at around 6:00 AM, an additional guard post in the area reported hearing gunshots, but the report did not receive any special attention since the sound of gunshots is commonplace in the area. Once the two bodies were discovered, a large number of forces were called to the area, at the same time, the terrorist was identified in Israeli territory. The inquiry into the incident found that during the firefight in which SSgt. Ohad Dahan was killed the terrorist was the first to fire.

The Brigade Commander’s mobile command center closed in on the terrorist after he was identified by a drone, exited the vehicle, and the terrorist opened fire from a distance of a few hundred meters. The initial fire hit Ohad, and according to IDF sources, the fire was not precise.

Read more.

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

RELATED ARTICLES:

The Palestinians’ Fantastic Lies About the History of Israel

Chinese warship comes within yards of US destroyer in latest act of aggression in Taiwan Strait: report

RELATED TWEETS:

Three Israeli soldiers were killed today in a terror attack on the border with Egypt by an Egyptian policeman who infiltrated into Israel. A joint investigation with Egypt is currently underway.

The 3 soldiers have been named as:
Staff Sgt. Ori Yitzhak Iluz (20)
Staff Sgt. Ohad… pic.twitter.com/NTUxfReV0W

— AIJAC (@AIJAC_Update) June 4, 2023

🇮🇱🇪🇬Updates about the terror attack on the Israel-Egypt border:

The Egyptian terrorist was carrying a knife and six firearm cartridges. 

The Israeli commander Ohad Dahan was driving in a military vehicle to research, when the surveillance drone alarmed about the suspicious… pic.twitter.com/WVgMClSlhg

— Ayelet Azoury (@azoury_ayelet) June 4, 2023

StopAntisemitism is heartbroken to hear of a terror attack on the Israel – Egypt border in which an Egyptian policeman infiltrated into Israel and murdered three IDF soldiers, including 19 year old Leah Ben Nun.

May their memories be a blessing to the families and communities. pic.twitter.com/BKL4YIx1dW

— StopAntisemitism (@StopAntisemites) June 3, 2023

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

A Sister of Perpetual Indulgence thumbnail

A Sister of Perpetual Indulgence

By The Catholic Thing

Anthony Esolen: Jeannine Gramick, a nun, indulges men who dress up as Catholic nuns. Does she also condone their grooming, enticing, and seducing?


Ever quick to embarrass faithful Catholics who do the hard and thankless work of attempting to reintroduce sanity to a society gone mad with sexual sin, and rendered lonely and embittered amidst the madness, Sister Jeannine Gramick – co-founder of the heretical New Ways Ministry, probably the most notorious pro-LGBT+ group that claims to be Catholic – has written a letter to the management of the Los Angeles Dodgers, praising them for honoring the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence at the club’s forthcoming “Pride Night.”

The Sisters will be honored, says Sister Gramick, for their “financial assistance to those in need.”  The Sisters are gay men got up in sexually fetishistic garb, mocking the dress of Catholic women religious. But, says Sister, even though their “choice of clothing” may be “offensive to some,” though not offensive to her, that offensiveness, which Sister does not take seriously, must not be allowed to “trump the works of mercy.”

I’ll wager that many a chapter of the Ku Klux Klan provided monetary assistance to the poor, so long as they were white.  No doubt the Roman legions took care of the widows and orphans of their fellow legionnaires.  King Leopold of Belgium had a heart for the Congolese, and they paid for his care in blood.  Crocodiles were said to shed tears before they devoured their prey, and doctors who shoulder people out of this world with an easy needle full of poison claim to have soft hearts too. And I can well imagine their shedding a public tear while they pack their bags and leave the grieving family with the task, sometimes not entirely unpleasant, of settling the details of the funeral and the disposal of the beloved remains.

If you say that the comparisons are unfair, I ask, “Why are there Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence at all?”  They have defined themselves by the evil they do, though they do not see it as such, or they do see it, but they choose it anyway.  Why should there have been a Ku Klux Klan, if not for terrorizing blacks (and later on, because it is hard to keep the acid of evil contained, Catholics and others)?  Why should there be assisters of suicide in the first place?

If you say that the Sisters are harmless, I wonder what world you are living in, or, supposing that you are in possession of ordinary faculties of observation and judgment, how you can live in this one with such ease.  Your soft head does not so much astonish me as your hard heart.

In the world I live in, in the nation we share, many millions of children grow up without a married mother and father.

In the world I live in, children and young people have been visited with a plague of sexual confusion which, as to its scope and the madness and the destructiveness of its character, is unprecedented in human history.

In the world I live in, unless they possess a heroic commitment to virtue, most young people will bring to their marriages, if they marry at all, a sorry series of sexual train wrecks, betrayals, and acts of animal indulgence, not boding well for their married future.

In the world I live in, the innocence of children is attacked on all sides, even in places where they should be held safest, such as schools, libraries, and parks.

The Klan gave all they had to prolonging, propagating, and making more profound the evil of racism.  The Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence, though they do not, in themselves, possess the sheer numbers that the Klan once boasted, do the like.  They exist to prolong, propagate, and make more profound the evils of the Lonely Revolution.

It is easy to oppose racism here and now, when everyone understands and takes for granted that segregation was evil and stupid.  What’s hard was to be someone like the novelist and reformer George Washington Cable, who wrote against the habits and feelings of many of his own people in the postbellum South, for the sake of justice and for their own moral and social welfare.

It was easy to oppose sexual vice at the Harvard of the Puritans.  What’s hard is to do so at Harvard now, when you know that if you do, you are likely to make your name odious to your fellow students, your professors, and prospective employers.

We may therefore turn Sister Gramick’s words back at her.  Why does she have no mercy for the children – in this case, mainly the boys, to whom she seems never to give a second thought – who must be spectators of the fetish?  Why does she have no mercy for the many and various victims of a world gone mad with sexual selfishness?

Even if she does not take seriously the many warnings against sexual sin that Scripture sounds, from Genesis through the prophets, from the Gospels to the letters of Paul to Revelation, why is she numb to the vast social and personal harm that it has caused?  Why should little children be burdened with broken families, parades of sex interests in and out of their homes, and the lewd and the vile and the chaotic everywhere in public?

And what about the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence?  Where is their mercy?  Where is their simple human decency?  Someone who actually thinks about other people and their welfare would never do what they do, or appear as they appear, in front of children and young people – and that is quite aside from the thoughtless coarsening of public morals.

But the answer to my question is in plain sight.  They want people to see them, especially children and young people.  Grooming, enticing, seducing; the message is clear.  “Look at us!  Aren’t we great?  Come join us someday, and have a lot of fun!”

I daresay that Sister Gramick knows very well that that is the message.  She does not care.  If that message gets to a young person and lures him into that life, she will be ready to cheer.  Easiest thing in the world.

You may also enjoy:

Fr. Gerald E. Murray’s Pope Francis Must Stop the Madness

Brad Miner’s Homosexuality in Scripture

AUTHOR

Anthony Esolen

Anthony Esolen is a lecturer, translator, and writer. Among his books are Out of the Ashes: Rebuilding American Culture, and Nostalgia: Going Home in a Homeless World, and most recently The Hundredfold: Songs for the Lord. He is a professor and writer in residence at Magdalen College of the Liberal Arts, in Warner, New Hampshire. Be sure to visit his new website, Word and Song.

EDITORS NOTE: This Catholic Thing column is republished with permission. © 2023 The Catholic Thing. All rights reserved. For reprint rights, write to: info@frinstitute.org. The Catholic Thing is a forum for intelligent Catholic commentary. Opinions expressed by writers are solely their own.

Jill Biden Snubs Israel on First Visit to Middle East as First Lady thumbnail

Jill Biden Snubs Israel on First Visit to Middle East as First Lady

By Jihad Watch

In 2021, the Muslim Brotherhood praised Democrats for siding with jihad terrorists against Zionist attacks. Their gratitude wasn’t far fetched. For the first time, Gallup has found this year that “Democrats’ sympathies in Middle East shift to Palestinians.” In fact, the Palestinian “resistance” has become a key element of the Democrat platform.

To reflect that fact, Jill Biden, on her first trip to the region as First Lady, included Jordan, Egypt, and Morocco on her tour agenda, but she snubbed Israel.

The Zionist Organization of America has blasted the Biden Administration’s “phony, dangerous antisemitism strategy” that the ZOA says enables antisemitism.

Jill Biden to Skip Israel on Middle East Trip

by Luca Cacciatore, Newsmax, June 1, 2023:

First Lady Jill Biden plans to avoid Israel during her trip to the Middle East, North Africa, and the Iberian Peninsula.

In a Tuesday thread on Twitter, the president’s wife revealed that she is visiting the Muslim-majority countries “to build on our longstanding partnerships and meet with young people across the region” to discuss the future.

She highlighted attending the wedding of Jordanian King Abdullah II bin Al-Hussein’s son, Crown Prince Hussein bin Abdullah, who is set to marry Saudi-born Rajwa Al Saif on June 1 at Zahran Palace.

Jill Biden’s trip will also include Jordan, Egypt, Morocco, and Portugal, The Associated Press reported.

“Government to government, people to people, and heart to heart, we will continue to strengthen our relationships in the region and reaffirm our commitment to the future of young people around the world,” the first lady stated….

Read more.

AUTHOR

CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS

RELATED ARTICLES:

Israel: Victim of Sbarro pizzeria jihad massacre dies after 22 years in coma

India authorities discover Islamic State plan to turn the country into an Islamic State by 2050

Austria: Muslim migrant attacks police with knife, then tries to punch them, violently resisting arrest

Cameroon: Islamic jihadis attack security post, murder two customs officers, a policeman and a civilian

Denmark: Muslim migrant accused of sexual abuse and beating of daughters, also beat his wife

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. All rights reserved.

SSPX Priest Found Guilty On All Charges In Abusing 27 Children thumbnail

SSPX Priest Found Guilty On All Charges In Abusing 27 Children

By Church Militant

Jury returns verdict in ‘horror’ trial of Fr. Pierre de Maillard. 


VENDÉE, France (ChurchMilitant.com) – A priest of the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) has been found guilty on all charges involving sex abuse of more than two dozen children.

The jury returned its verdict Friday evening against Fr. Pierre de Maillard, charged with four counts of rape and 33 sexual assaults against 27 children over the course of 25 years. The crimes took place in his SSPX assignments in the Vendée and elsewhere.

The court agreed with public prosecutor, Emmanuelle Lepissier, in adopting most of her recommendations: Maillard will receive the maximum possible sentence: 20 years behind bars, two-thirds of that time without the possibility of parole.

This will be followed by a 10-year probation period that will require that Maillard receive treatment. Failure to follow the rules of probation could result in another five years in prison.

Lionel Béthune de Moro, who represented the victims, lauded the “exemplary and long-awaited punishment in view of the extraordinary nature of the multiple criminal acts brought before the Assize Court against a defendant who himself claims to be a paedophile.”

Maillard is banned from ever returning to the Vendée or neighboring Charente-Maritime, or being around children. He is also required to register as a sex offender.

This marks the end of a two-week trial beginning May 22 in the Court of Assizes in La Roche-Sur-Yon, in the Vendée region in western France.

Some likened the trial to a “horror film,” as victim testimony behind closed doors revealed Maillard’s penchant for making his victims watch pornography (his favorite site was 666porn) and using oils and music to massage his victims before assaulting them, among other details.

At least two victims collapsed during trial. According to Ouest-France, “On Tuesday May 30, a complainant testifying at the trial of Abbé de Maillard collapsed in the middle of the hearing. … The victim, still a minor, reportedly couldn’t stand the priest’s denials.”

Maillard in fact changed his testimony, denying ever having committed any abuse, while at other times admitting to the sexual assaults but denying the rapes.

The priestly ministry “confers more duties than rights,” said victims’ attorney Lionel Béthune de Moro. “The accused may have helped the victims at one point in their lives, but today he claims to be a pedophile. It’s chilling.”

Alluding to the silence of those in the know regarding Maillard’s abuse, de Moro added, “As soon as you become aware of sexual violence, whether you’re a parent or a parishioner, you have to report it to the law.”

According to Ouest-France, another trial may await the 56-year-old priest: “[T]hree complaints have been lodged in recent weeks. This could lead to a new judicial investigation and, ultimately, a second trial.”

SSPX Kept Predator in Ministry

As Church Militant reported, the French district superior had been made aware of abuse allegations years before but never reported Maillard to police.

During the second week of trial, a victim confronted de Jorna: “I reported the events to you back in 2017. Why did nothing happen? I don’t understand.”

De Jorna dismissed the question: “All you had to do was file a complaint.”

“I have a real feeling of bitterness,” said the same victim.  “We’re not talking about one blunder but three” — referring to other allegations reported to the SSPX and not taken seriously.

“They knew and hid it,” said other victims of Maillard. “They told the victims to keep quiet because it would discredit the Society. But for them, it’s the Society that will save the Church, and it’s the Church that will save the world. Many continue to remain silent because of this.”

At trial it was also revealed that in 2013, over “minor” incidents with children, the SSPX placed a ban on Maillard from being around children, which included 10 years from working in a school or children’s camps or hearing children’s confessions, and a five-year ban on catechizing children.

The Society, however, never followed through on the ban, which led to Maillard having access to children and abusing again.

The SSPX has a track record of failing to follow through on its bans of predator priests, leading to further victimization of children.

Maillard was arrested in October 2020, two days after Church Militant reported that the accused pedophile was living at the SSPX retreat house (the “Golden Prison”) in Montgardin, France, where he had been sent to do “prayer and penance.” An initial investigation turned up 19 victims, but further questioning revealed 27.

The guilty verdict follows two months after another SSPX priest, Fr. Matthew Stafki, pled guilty to molesting his 9-year-old niece over the course of three years in Minnesota. Stafki is facing up to 25 years in prison. His sentencing is scheduled for June 23.

Church Militant emailed SSPX leadership asking for comment on Maillard’s verdict but received no immediate response.

EDITORS NOTE: This Church Militant column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

GAZA: A History You May Not Know thumbnail

GAZA: A History You May Not Know

By Victor Sharpe

The nearly four-thousand-year-old association of Jewish life in Gaza is little known or honored in today’s world. Of course, people know of the Biblical story of Samson being blinded by the now extinct Philistines and how he brought down the temple to their gods in Gaza. But very few have any idea of the deep Jewish history in the following millennia.

In the Second millennium BC, Gaza served as an administrative city and residence of the Egyptian governor of Canaan. The Bible tells us that the Jewish Biblical patriarch, Isaac, dug wells in Gerar, an ancient site between Beer Sheba and Gaza, and in the 13th century BC the Philistines or Caphorites (Cretans) annihilated the Avite inhabitants of Gaza and made the city the largest of their five centers.

After the Israelite Exodus from Egypt and entry into the Promised Land, the tribe of Judah was given Gaza as a possession but did not include it fully in their territory. The Bible reports in Joshua 15.47 and Judges 1:18 how the city of Gaza, and those of Ekron, Ashkelon, Ashdod and Gat became a possession of Israel but how some of them were among those places ‘lying in the remaining country,’ i.e., not fully possessed by the Israelites.

Down the centuries, Gaza was captured by Assyrians, Egyptians, Babylonians, Persians and later still by Alexander the Great who incorporated it into his growing empire in the 5th century BC. The strategic territory, lying as it does at the crossroads of two continents, Africa and Asia, has repeatedly fallen since earliest times to invading armies.

In 167 BC, Judah Maccabee led his Jewish warriors to victory over the Syrian-Greek pagan king, Antiochus Epiphanies. Jerusalem was liberated and the Jewish Temple cleansed from pagan occupation. The miracle of this event is now celebrated during the Jewish festival of Hanukah. But it was the Hasmonean king, Yochanan, who also liberated Gaza in 145 BC. He was the brother of Judah the Maccabee and it was their other brother, Simon, who led the indigenous Jews to repopulate Gaza and its environs.

In the Book of Maccabees: 1:15, it says:

“Not a strange land have we conquered, and not over the possessions of strangers have we ruled, but of the inheritance of our Fathers that was in the hands of the enemy and conquered by them unlawfully. And as for us, when we had the chance, we returned to ourselves the inheritance of our Fathers.”

The Roman general, Pompey, conquered Judea in the First century BC and made Gaza a free “polis” but in 61 AD the Roman Governor, Gavinius, evicted the Jews. In the subsequent war against the brutal Roman occupation of Judea, between 67 and 70 AD, Jewish forces again liberated the town and its environs before suffering defeat at the hands of Rome’s legions and overwhelming power.

Continuing Roman excesses against the Jews led to the Second Jewish Revolt under the command of the charismatic Bar Kochba, known in Aramaic as Son of a Star. The Emperor Hadrian’s legions destroyed the Jewish state in 135 AD. They decimated the Jewish population in an enormous slaughter, sending thousands into slavery and exile from the Roman slave markets of Gaza.

Under the subsequent harsh Byzantine rule, Gaza’s restored Jewish community nevertheless managed to flourish and during the 4th century Gaza served as the primary port of commerce for the Jews of the Holy Land.

It is interesting to note that in 1967, archaeologists discovered the beautiful mosaic floor of a 6th century synagogue situated on the Gaza seashore, attesting to the size and prominence of the Jewish community of the time.

The great medieval kabbalist Rabbi Avraham Azoulai lived in Gaza where he authored his famed work, Hesed L’Avraham, along with a commentary on the Torah (the first five books of the Bible). The Jewish inhabitants made Gaza a great center of study and towns and villages from Rafah to Yavne sprung up as centers of Talmudic learning.

Many Jews fled to Gaza from Europe at the end of the 15th century where they joined the Jewish community by working in various trades after escaping from the ravages of the Catholic Inquisition.

During the 17th century, Gaza was again home to a thriving Jewish community, which boasted its share of prominent rabbis, including Rabbi Israel Najara, author of Kah Ribbon Olam, the popular hymn sung to this day in Jewish homes around the world every Sabbath. He served as Gaza’s Chief Rabbi until his death in 1625.

The great scholar, Rabbi Yaakov Emden, ruled centuries ago that Gaza is an intrinsic part of the Jewish people’s national heritage. “Gaza and its environs are absolutely considered part of the Land of Israel,” he wrote in his work, Mor U’ketziyah, adding, “there is no doubt that it is a mitzvah (commandment and blessing) to live there, as in any other part of the Land of Israel.”

Over the millennia Jews have been expelled from Gaza by many different conquerors but have always managed to return. The Crusaders killed many of Gaza’s Jews, leaving few survivors. Ottoman Turks ruled a vast empire from 1517 to 1917, including the geographical backwater known as Palestine. They also frequently expelled the Jewish residents but then allowed them to return. This pattern continued for centuries.

Napoleon, marching through Gaza from Egypt in 1799 failed to restrain many of his French soldiers who were joined by local Arabs in abusing the Jewish residents. As a result of Arab persecution, the ancient Jewish presence in Gaza and the nearby villages died out in the first years of the 19th century only to return yet again in the 1870s.

In August 1929, when Muslim Arab rioters threatened to slaughter Gaza’s Jews – as they had in Hebron – the British army under the Palestine Mandate forced the community to evacuate their homes. In October 1946, on the night following the holiest Jewish festival of Yom Kippur, the Gaza Jewish community of Kfar Darom was established on land corresponding to the ancestral and ancient Biblical Jewish village of Darom. It lasted just a year and a half until the outbreak of Israel’s War of Independence in 1948, when Egypt overran the Gaza Strip and occupied it.

In June 1967, in a war of self-defense, Israel liberated Gaza from Egyptian occupation, making it possible once again for Jews to reside there. In 2001, during Palestinian Authority control under arch terrorist, Yasser Arafat and his Fatah organization, Kassam rocket attacks began to pound the restored Jewish villages in Gaza.

After Arafat’s death, rocket fire continued under his successor, Mahmoud Abbas. But in 2005, Israel’s Prime Minister Ariel Sharon forcefully evicted from their homes the nearly 10,000 Jewish villagers and farmers from Gaza as part of the Disengagement Plan. At the time, Sharon explained the purpose of the Israeli pull-out:

“These steps will increase security for the residents of Israel and relieve the pressure on the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) and security forces in fulfilling the difficult tasks they are faced with. The Disengagement Plan is meant to grant maximum security and minimize friction between Israelis and Palestinians.”

Sharon had believed that by removing the flourishing Jewish villages and farms from Gaza, the Arab residents would build a civilized and peaceful society, thus proving to both Israel and the world that they could live in peace with the Jewish state. It was a naïve and catastrophic blunder by Sharon whose hopes now lie shattered.

In an election pushed by Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice, the Palestinian Arabs in Gaza voted eagerly for Hamas and against Fatah knowing full well that Hamas fundamentalist ideology calls for the destruction of Israel or any non-Muslim state existing in territory previously conquered in the name of Allah. Hamas will thus never live in peace with Israel, a Jewish state, even though the Jews are the indigenous and native people of the region and predate Islam by millennia.

Will the pattern that has existed for thousands of years continue; a sequence of Jewish exile from Gaza, followed by inevitable restoration? Those Jews who were driven out by the Israeli government of Ariel Sharon and his successor, Ehud Olmert, now wait as refugees for the opportunity to again return.

One such Israeli refugee from Gaza, Rachel Saperstein, spoke at a Jerusalem Conference held in Israel in 2009. At the time, she lived with her husband, a disabled terror victim, in a rundown camp along with five hundred other Jewish families driven from their homes and farms in the Gaza Strip.

In her speech, she lamented that not a thing now grows in the Jewish village she was forced to abandon during the Disengagement Plan. The greenhouses that were given freely to the Palestinian Arabs were trashed by them. She added:

“We know the reason why. Only when the Jews return to their land will the land bring forth its bounty. No Israeli government is to give away any of our land ever again … This is my message.”

Despite Gaza’s rich Jewish history, little is known of it to most people even as thousands of lethal Palestinian missiles from Gaza fired by Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and by the so-called Palestinian moderates of Fatah, land on civilian targets throughout Israel.

And how many people know that since the Jewish residents and villagers in Gaza were driven out in 2005, over 30,000 missiles have been fired at Israeli civilians with hardly a day free from its looming threat of death and destruction?

© Victor Sharpe 2023. All rights reserved.

PSA: June Is Life Month, Not Pride Month thumbnail

PSA: June Is Life Month, Not Pride Month

By Family Research Council

You make known to me the path of life… (Psalm 16:11)


For many in America today, the advent of June signals the beginning of what has been labeled “Pride Month” by the activist Left. Originally linked to what is called the “Stonewall Uprising,” Pride Month symbolizes glowing affirmation of LGBTQ identity.

All June long, corporations and cultural institutions practically trip over themselves to promote their involvement in Pride Month, putting many Christians (or people who simply hold to a traditional sexual ethic) in difficult spots. When we try to watch a show at the end of a workday, our entertainment platforms drive us to Pride Month content. When buying a tube of toothpaste at our local big-box store, Pride Month displays greet us. When we watch sports, teams wear rainbow patches to celebrate Pride Month. The celebration of LGBTQ identity feels ubiquitous, and belies the claim that our public square is “neutral” and closed to assertive worldviews.

We Live in Dark Days

From many angles, the entire tone of June in America has shifted. It is one of aggressive approval of a heart attitude that the Word of God rebukes in no uncertain terms: pride. To be proud in one’s natural instincts and desires is to go against God at full velocity. It is to put oneself under certain threat of eternal judgment. Sin, after all, is at base nothing other than pride — it is choosing one’s way over God’s way, and one’s instinctual desires over God’s eternal truth. How we Christians should tremble and pray for all who exult in Pride Month. How we should reach out to them, and proclaim Christ in love to fellow sinners just like us.

But we should not stop there. We have our own cause to celebrate in June. Our cause, quite simply, is life. In June 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down Roe v. Wade, the devastatingly inhumane court decision that since 1973 has enabled the destruction of millions upon millions of children. In the long annals of public jurisprudence, one can scarcely find a more wicked measure than Roe. Yet in his all-wise providence, God saw fit to strike Roe down right in the middle of Pride Month. What a rebuke! What an otherworldly intervention.

It’s hard to underplay just how shocking this development was and is. News of the coming overturning of Roe started leaking in early May 2022. Personally, I happened to be flying into D.C. for FRC meetings just as this news broke. It seemed too wonderful to be true: the most monstrously evil decision in modern American history was going to be struck down? The night after word got out, FRC staffer David Closson and I went to the Supreme Court. The tone was one of rage as countless young men and women protested the news. I scarcely knew what to do as David and I wound our way through the huge — and very angry — crowds. Was this real life?

June Is Life Month, Not Pride Month

It was indeed real life. But those days of dazed wonderment are over. Now, as in ancient Israel, have come the days of settled joy. No, the fight against abortion is not over, not by a long shot. But believers should celebrate genuinely God-given victories. We who are saved by grace would be ungrateful children indeed if we did not honor this great outcome in the public square, one akin to the ban on slavery in Wilberforce’s day. Toward that end, here’s my encouragement: all through June, celebrate “Life Month.”

We should not do so in an obnoxious way. We are not fighting flesh and blood, after all. But in days that feel so dark, God has given us a great victory. This means that June is no longer a month for exalting human pride; June is a month for exalting God’s greatness. It is a time to rejoice in God’s gift of life, natural life, and spiritual life. God is our Creator, making every image-bearer such that every single unborn child has God-given dignity, worth, and purpose. God is also our Redeemer, making dead sinners live through the gospel message (Romans 1:16).

There is no better message than this. It is far, far greater than the pagan gospel, the message that you will find true happiness by embracing your natural instincts and then finding affirmation from others in them. This is no gospel at all, in reality, and it leads to fleshly captivity. But according to the true gospel, there is a way out of this enslavement. God is not only Creator and Redeemer, but Lord. The risen and ascended Christ rules the cosmos. At present, his rule is a spiritual rule, calling us to forsake the flesh, join the visible church as members, and live by grace as salt and light in this realm. In human pride, there is slavery; in Christ alone, there is freedom.

God Loves Life

Our world loves death, for death is what following the father of lies gets you. But Christians love life, for life is what God delights to form, naturally but especially spiritually. So, in June, I encourage you: celebrate Life Month. Praise God for his grace. Share your celebration on social media. Create graphics and images, and promote them. Do podcasts about this. Don’t be silent; don’t be intimidated by our pagan culture into muteness. Speak, and don’t stop speaking. Pray, and don’t stop praying.

Start serving at a pro-life work. In fact, work against abortion any way you can, recognizing the murder of an unborn child as a genuine crime, whatever complex factors may lead to the pursuit of one. Calmly engage someone who is celebrating Pride Month, and proclaim Christ to them. Lovingly tell them the truth about sin and the hope that is in Christ. No one is too far gone for God to save them. And no one who is saved is a hopeless case, an abandoned child of God, or too much of a spiritual failure to grow in grace. I repeat myself: for all of us, there is hope, infinite hope, in Christ (Colossians 1:27).

June is Life Month. It cannot be otherwise. In June 2022, the Lord of heaven and earth saw fit to strike down the chief “right” (and rite) of the liberal worldview in the very month when that worldview was most glorified and praised. What an incredible move this was. God, you see, is not mocked. Nor is God asleep. To the contrary, the living personal God is active and working. This God is the God of dramatic reversals and breathtaking miracles. This God loves and celebrates life.

So must we.

AUTHOR

Owen Strachan

Owen Strachan is Senior Fellow for FRC’s Center for Biblical Worldview.

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

0 0 Family Research Council 2023-06-01 15:09:26PSA: June Is Life Month, Not Pride Month

School District Tells Gym Teachers To Wear Gay Flags, Use Preferred Pronouns To Make Class More ‘Inclusive’ thumbnail

School District Tells Gym Teachers To Wear Gay Flags, Use Preferred Pronouns To Make Class More ‘Inclusive’

By The Daily Caller

A Colorado school district encouraged its physical education (P.E.) teachers to don LGBT pride gear and use preferred pronouns in an effort to display their support for the LGBTQ community, according to documents obtained by the Daily Caller News Foundation through a public records request.

On March 8, a group of Jeffco Public Schools high school teachers were trained on how to make the district’s P.E. programs “even more inclusive,” where all students feel welcome regardless of their “race, ethnicity or sexual orientation,” according to a presentation obtained by the DCNF through a public records request. Teachers were trained to engage in “public visibility” by sporting some sort of rainbow pride gear such as a pin or t-shirt, plan or participate in pride events and practice using preferred pronouns.

“We know from research and feedback from students around the country that visibility matters immensely in building inclusion,” the presentation read. “A pin, t-shirt, flags, stickers and use of pronouns are impactful ways of making a difference.”

Teachers can participate in “public visibility” by having “safe-space and ally messages” in waiting areas, hallways and in the locker room, the training stated. Teachers can also wear a “scarf, shirt, tie, lapel pin and shoes” to send a “strong message of support.”

“Guessing” someone’s preferred pronouns can be “offensive and harassing,” while using “correct” pronouns is a good way to show someone you respect them, the training stated. The presentation suggested that teachers include their pronouns on a white board, in their email signature, on their zoom profile and on their business cards.

Students should be allowed to use locker rooms and participate in P.E. classes on the basis of gender identity rather than biological sex, though each transgender student should be assessed on a case-by-case basis, the training stated. To create an “inclusive and safe” locker room, the training suggested teachers use an “anonymous tip box” or “offer alternative spaces.”

“Unless precluded by state interscholastic association policies, students should be permitted to participate in interscholastic athletics in a manner consistent with their gender identity,” the training read.

For sports teams, teachers and coaches were encouraged to document “inclusion” and potentially modify team policies to state that all students are welcome “regardless of race, religion, sexuality or gender identity,” the training stated.

LGBTQ students experience “barriers” that keep them from exercising such as a “lack of safe spaces” in locker rooms and bathrooms, and “gendered classes and teams,” the training showed.

The Education Department (ED) released proposed changes to Title IX in April that, if adopted, would bar public K-12 schools and colleges from adopting a “one-size-fits-all-policy” and prohibit students from joining sports teams on the basis of gender identity. School districts throughout the nation are adopting policies to separate sports teams on the basis of gender identity rather than biological sex; in April, the San Francisco State University athletics director claimed there is no “competitive” difference between men and women in sports.

“We will learn from each other to increase the sense of belonging for our students that identify as LGBTQ+, especially in the world of sports and PE,” the presentation stated.

Jeffco Public Schools did not immediately respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.

AUTHOR

REAGAN REESE

Contributor.

RELATED ARTICLE: Child Gender Clinic Trained Teachers To Help Transition Elementary School Kids

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

More Israelis Have Been Killed in 5 Months of Biden Than 2 Years of Trump thumbnail

More Israelis Have Been Killed in 5 Months of Biden Than 2 Years of Trump

By Jihad Watch

Biden and the Democrats are funding the murder of Jews.


The Muslim terrorist campaign, funded by foreign aid from the United States, continues. The latest casualty is Meir Tamari.

(JNS) – A 32-year-old Israeli man was killed on Tuesday in a terrorist shooting near the Jewish community of Hermesh in northwestern Samaria.

The victim, identified as Meir Tamari, sustained a bullet wound to the upper body, medics said. He received treatment at the scene before being evacuated by helicopter to Hillel Yaffe Medical Center in Hadera, where he was pronounced dead.

Tamari is survived by his wife and two children, ages one and three.

The Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades claimed responsibility for the shooting.

Meir Tamari is the 20th victim of Islamic terrorism in Israel so far this year. That tops the combined number of Israeli deaths in all of 2019 and 2020 under Trump. At this rate, there will likely be more Israelis killed in 2023 than during the entire Trump administration.

As I wrote earlier this year, this is due to the Biden administration’s decision to provide political support and funding for the terrorists.

In Feb 2019, President Trump’s total cutoff of aid became official. That year, 10 Israelis or people in Israeli controlled areas were killed in stabbings, shootings, rocket and other attacks, down from 12 the previous year, and 15 in 2017, and 16 in 2016.

In 2020 however only three Israelis were killed.

More murders comes down to more money.

The Trump administration cut off aid to the PLO’s Palestinian Authority and Congress passed the Taylor Force Act banning funds from going to finance Pay-to-Slay.

Throughout all this, PLO leadership have been consistent in refusing to stop financing terrorism.

“We will neither reduce nor prevent [payment] of allowances to the families of martyrs, prisoners and released prisoners, as some seek, and if we had only a single penny left, we would pay it to families of the martyrs and prisoners,” Abbas had bragged. By “martyrs”, he meant those Islamic terrorists who were killed while carrying out terrorist attacks.

Despite this, the Biden administration had restored aid and rebuilt diplomatic relations. Biden and Blinken have met with Abbas. And while they have attacked Israel over everything from letting Jews pray on the Temple Mount (due to Jewish prayers offending Muslim sensibilities) to democratic judicial reform that will limit the unilateral authority of pro-terrorist judges, Biden and Blinken have had nothing to say to the terrorists about the program funding the murder of Jews.

Terrorists are paid based on the length of their prison sentence. That means successful killers can earn $2,000 to $3,000 a month in a part of the world where the average salary is around $700 a month. It’s five times more profitable to be a terrorist than a teacher.

The Palestinian Authority calls for the murder of Jews, praises it and then rewards it.

And the Biden administration rewards the Palestinian Authority.

In a statement carried by Palestinian media, the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades terror group, loosely linked to the Palestinian Authority’s ruling Fatah party, claimed responsibility for the deadly attack.

“We affirm that this operation and others will not be the final response to our martyrs,” the statement read.

Biden and the Democrats are funding the murder of Jews.

AUTHOR

DANIEL GREENFIELD

RELATED ARTICLES:

Biden Regime Anti-Semitism Letter to Colleges Makes No Mention of Israel

NYC: Muslim gets just 60 days in jail for brutally assaulting Jewish man while railing against ‘dirty Jews’

Muslims murder 50 Christians, including pastor, displace 500 more Christians in Nigeria

Sweden: Muslim migrant previously hailed as ‘democracy ambassador’ threatens to kill anti-mass migration politician

France: Statue of the Virgin Mary decapitated

UK: Muslim group teaches young children about Islam at Church of England primary school

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Welcome to the Objective Room thumbnail

Welcome to the Objective Room

By Micah Meadowcroft

The Dodgers’ capitulation to the LGBT lobby demonstrates yet again that Christians have lost the culture war.

As goes baseball, so goes the country. America’s pastime may be much diminished from its golden age, but in a culturally fractured moment nostalgia makes it all the more important as a symbol. So it is worth noting, suggesting something of catacombs, when the Los Angeles Dodgers would rather offend Christians and sitting U.S. senators than risk the wrath of the homosexual lobby.

The team announced last Wednesday that it would no longer honor the drag fraternity “Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence” with a Community Hero Award at its LGBT etc. celebration on June 16. Senator Marco Rubio had written to Major League Baseball Commissioner Rob Manfred questioning whether honoring a group dedicated to obscenity and the mockery of religious devotion would be “inclusive and welcoming to Christians.” But on Monday, the Dodgers backtracked, with a groveling apology to the gay clowns, re-inviting them to the team’s tenth annual Pride Night.

A decade, then, at least for one professional baseball organization, is how long it takes for pro-gay to become anti-Christian. This is baseball, recall; the team needn’t really have ever taken a public position on the sexual revolution, let alone prostrate, but here it is, and it says much more about American culture as a whole than about the Dodgers in particular. There was a culture war, once, and you lost.

The right response to all this—the spectacle of degenerates mocking women, nuns, and God in one costume; the dust-eating pardon-begging by the Dodgers, “we will continue to work with our LGBTQ+ partners to better educate ourselves”—is simple disgust.

Some things are disgusting, and we should cherish and protect our capacity for disgust. The global homogenization that characterizes our time seeks to erase all distinction—between men and women, better and worse, adults and children—and to have its revenge for the distinctions that persist despite those efforts. To bring forth a beige world of polymorphous perversity, slaves to modernity like these perpetually indulgent work to erase your instinct for reality, the individual spark of human spirit that aspires to the high and is revolted by the low. They want to desensitize you to disgust.

In his modern fairy-tale for grownups, That Hideous Strength, C.S. Lewis describes “the Objective Room.” It is a place for bludgeoning the soul. In a pivotal scene, the not-very-heroic protagonist, Mark, is brought to the Objective Room and asked to trample “a large crucifix, almost life size, a work of art in the Spanish tradition, ghastly and realistic.” He is not a Christian, yet he finds the demand too much. The room has been the arena for a contest in Mark’s mind between “the Crooked,” everything subtly wrong, twisted, and distorted, and “the Straight or Normal or Wholesome.” But this icon is something new:

“this image, though not itself an image of the Straight or Normal, was yet in opposition to crooked Belbury. It was a picture of what happened when the Straight met the Crooked, a picture of what the Crooked did to the Straight — what it would do to him if he remained straight. It was, in a more emphatic sense than he had yet understood, a cross.”

It is the final test.

The men who seek to condition Mark by exposure to the Crooked—to make him believe that “objectively” there is no difference between it and the Straight—must in the end resort to blasphemy. It is not enough to celebrate the diseased and belittle the normal; eventually a stronger statement is needed. And this is the significance of the “Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence”: Eventually not even drag is enough. (Indeed, the group has hosted “hunky Jesus” contests.) And now the Dodgers, desensitized by a decade of celebration, reject the concerns of Christians and again extend their invitation to degraded mockeries of holiness. The ratchet of progress turns only one way.

You live in the Objective Room, reader. Toleration comes from a position of strength, and, good Christian, you are not doing the tolerating—nor even being tolerated. As the evangelical writer Aaron Renn has argued, since about 2014, which marks the cultural victory of the Alphabet People over a normal that had forgotten why normal mattered—remember, Obergefell was 2015—you have lived in a Negative World. While once Christianity was celebrated, and then at least accepted as part of an American public square, in a Negative World, “being known as a Christian is a social negative, particularly in the elite domains of ­society. Christian morality is expressly repudiated and seen as a threat to the public good and the new public moral order.”

For those in comfortable suburban enclaves, Renn’s thesis may sound histrionic. But think for a moment about what has happened here. A large-market baseball team—an avatar of American culture and big business—was pressured by religious groups and a sitting U.S. senator to maintain a recently expected standard of public decorum. They did not protest a Pride Night and the Dodgers’ celebration of sexual expressivism, only an obviously anti-Catholic and even anti-Christian demonstration. This was a request for toleration from a position of weakness. And now there is no hesitation to trample.

*****

This article was published by The American Conservative and is reproduced with permission.

TAKE ACTION

As we move through 2023 and into the next election cycle, The Prickly Pear will resume Take Action recommendations and information.

Saint John Paul II’s Theology of the Body: ‘God created man in his own image…male and female he created them.’ thumbnail

Saint John Paul II’s Theology of the Body: ‘God created man in his own image…male and female he created them.’

By Dr. Rich Swier

“God created man in his own image; in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them.” — Genesis 1:27


Pope John Paul II, born Karol Józef Wojtya, was the head of the Catholic Church and sovereign of the Vatican City State from 1978 until his death in 2005. He was the first non-Italian pope since Adrian VI in the 16th century and the third longest-serving pope after Pius IX and St. Peter.

He was beatified as Pope Saint John Paul II on May 1st, 2011.

The following is his “Theology of the Body” based upon a series of 129 lectures he gave from 1980 to 1984.

It covers what it means to be a male and female created by God, the Father. It covers our individual responsibilities and duties as fathers, mothers, and followers of Christ Jesus. It is a guide to living a good and holy life.


Theology of the Body

NOTE: Each chapter is provided with a synopsis of its message. To read the full chapter please click on the title.

1. Of the Unity and Indissolubility of Marriage

On 5 September 1979, in the first of his General Audiences on the Theology of the Body, the Holy Father expounded the words of Christ, “In the beginning the Creator made them male and female.”

2. Biblical Account of Creation Analysed

In his General Audience of 12 September 1979, the Holy Father compared two accounts of man’s creation from Genesis, establishing basic principles for his study of the Theology of the Body.

3. The Second Account of Creation: The Subjective Definition of Man

In his General Audience of 19 September 1979, the Holy Father examined the account of man’s creation in the second chapter of Genesis, observing its profundity in revealing the subjective side of creation in the image of God.

4. Boundary Between Original Innocence and Redemption

In his General Audience on 26 September 1979, the Holy Father considered a continuity between man’s state of original innocence and the state of original sin, which left him open to the grace of redemption.

5. Meaning of Man’s Original Solitude

In his General Audience on 10 October 1979, the Holy Father examined man’s solitude, not as male, distinct from female, but in his nature as distinct from other living things, his difference in superiority, revealed to him in his self-consciousness.

6. Man’s Awareness of Being a Person

In his General Audience on 24 October 1979, the Holy Father linked “man’s original solitude,” as different from and superior to other living creatures, with consciousness of his body.

7. In the Very Definition of Man, the Alternative Between Death and Immortality

In his General Audience on 31 October 1979, the Holy Father addressed again the solitude in which man was created, in relation to other creatures, but also with regard to his freedom of moral choice. The alternatives of death and immortality lay with him.

8. Original Unity of Man and Woman

In his General Audience of 7 November 1979, the Holy Father continued to lay groundwork for his Theology of the Body, meditating on Adam’s “sleep” from which the division of the sexes emerged.

9. Man Becomes the Image of God by Communion of Persons

In his General Audience of 14 November 1979, the Holy Father located the image of God, in which man was created, not only in the solitude of his humanity, but also in the communion of persons, in the creation of the first man and woman in relation to each other.

10. Marriage One and Indissoluble in First Chapters of Genesis

In his General Audience of 21 November 1979, the Holy Father spoke on the communion of the first man and woman, how it renewed their original unity before separation in creation, and revealed the meaning of their bodies by their complementarity.

11. Meaning of Original Human Experiences

In his General Audience of 12 December 1979, the Holy Father observed that, in the Genesis account, the shame at their nakedness, experienced by the first man and woman after the Fall, contrasts with their original innocence, which invites further study of their original consciousness of their bodies.

12. Fullness of Interpersonal Communication

In his General Audience of 19 December 1979, the Holy Father continued his series on the Theology of the Body, analyzing the absence of shame in our first parents, despite their nakedness, and its bearing on their communication.

13. Creation as a Fundamental and Original Gift

In his General Audience of 2 January 1980, the Holy Father continued his study of the Theology of the Body, analyzing the consciousness of our first parents, in how they perceived each other, without shame in their nakedness, as good, and a mutual gift, part of the good gift of God’s creation.

14. Revelation and Discovery of the Nuptial Meaning of the Body

In his General Audience of 9 January 1980, the Holy Father explained the “nuptial meaning” of the body as first experienced by Adam and Eve. Man, both male and female, realizes his essence only in living with and for someone else. The possibility of this mutual self-gift is manifested in the bodies of male and female, which gives them their nuptial meaning.

15. The Man-Person Becomes a Gift in the Freedom of Love

In his General Audience of 16 January 1980, the Holy Father continued his series on the Theology of the Body, by examining the “nuptial meaning of the body.” Through self-mastery, by which the purely physical side of sex was restrained, the first man and woman were free to give themselves totally to each other, and thereby discovered their true selves.

16. Mystery of Man’s Original Innocence

In his General Audience of 30 January 1980, the Holy Father pursued his examination of the Theology of the Body by dwelling on the mystery of man’s original innocence, that purity of heart which enabled Adam and Eve to give themselves to each other in love, as the effect of grace.

17. Man and Woman: A Mutual Gift for Each Other

In his General Audience of 6 February 1980, the Holy Father reexamined the nuptial meaning of the body, in the mutual gift of self by our first parents, in the context of their original innocence.

18. Original Innocence and Man’s Historical State

In his General Audience of 13 February 1980, the Holy Father reexamined our first parents’ original innocence, as their nature was originally graced, how it affected their relationship to each other and the nuptial meaning of their bodies as male and female.

19. Man Enters the World as a Subject of Truth and Love

In his General Audience of 20 February 1980, the Holy Father continued his series on the Theology of the Body. Created in the image of God, man (Adam and Eve) entered the world as a primordial sacrament, a sign to the visible world of the invisible mystery hidden in God, the mystery of truth and love, the mystery of divine life, in which man really participates.

20. Analysis of Knowledge and of Procreation

In his General Audience of 5 March 1980, the Holy Father continued his series on the Theology of the Body, by examining the meaning of the biblical statement that “Adam knew Eve his wife” (Gn 4:1-2).

21. Mystery of Woman Revealed in Motherhood

In his General Audience of 12 March 1980, the Holy Father further examined the concept of mutual “knowledge” between the first man and woman. The woman is brought to full awareness of the mystery of creation, in its renewal in human generation.

22. Knowledge-Generation Cycle and Perspective of Death

In his General Audience of 26 March 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body. He further examined biblical “knowledge,” as the nuptial relationship before the fall, a mutual, disinterested gift of self between spouses, contrasting it with the same relationship as a remedy for death after the fall.

23. Marriage in the Integral Vision of Man

In his General Audience of 2 April 1980, the Holy Father continued his series on Theology of the Body. Only by going back to the “beginning,” as Christ did in answering the Pharisees on divorce, can we get a total vision of man, male and female, and only so can we adequately understand marriage and procreation.

24. Christ Appeals to Man’s Heart

In his General Audience of 16 April 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body by turning to Christ’s teaching, in the Sermon on the Mount, on adultery in the heart.

25. Ethical and Anthropological Content of the Commandment: You Shall Not Commit Adultery

At his General Audience of 23 April 1980, the Holy Father continued his series on Theology of the Body. He examined the meaning of adultery, which is a breach in the unity of husband and wife, even if only by an interior act (“adultery in the heart”). He cited the case of David and Bathsheba.

26. Lust is the Fruit of the Breach of the Covenant With God

In his General Audience of 30 April 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body. He examined the three-fold lust, of the flesh, of the eyes, and the pride of life, by which man broke God’s original covenant.

27. Real Significance of Original Nakedness

In his General Audience of 14 May 1980, the Holy Father continued his series on Theology of the Body, explaining the nakedness of man after the fall as not merely physical. “…this man was deprived of the supernatural and preternatural gifts which were part of his endowment before sin. Furthermore, he suffered a loss in what belongs to his nature itself, to humanity in the original fullness of the image of God.”

28. A Fundamental Disquiet in All Human Existence

In his General Audience of 2 June 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body. The shame experienced by man after his fall expressed a deeper shame, called “cosmic,” reflecting a new disorder in his nature, by which not only was the relationship between man and woman affected, but the relationship between body and spirit.

29. Relationship of Lust to Communion of Persons

In his General Audience of 4 June 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body. He examined the radical transformation wrought by lust and shame in the original relationship between the first man and woman.

30. Dominion Over the Other in the Interpersonal Relation

In his General Audience of 18 June 1980, the Holy Father continued his series on Theology of the Body. Because of their sin, the man and woman feel shame toward each other, their communion is weakened, and he will exercise dominion over her.

31. Lust Limits Nuptial Meaning of the Body

In his General Audience of 25 June 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body. The sin of Adam and Eve distorted the “nuptial meaning of the body,” its masculinity/femininity, which was meant to shape their communion. Their relationship was corrupted by lust, which includes the desire to possess the other, rather than receive him/her as a free gift.

32. The Heart a Battlefield Between Love and Lust

In his General Audience of 23 July 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body. After the fall, human sexuality was marked by a certain “coercion of the body,” which subverts the expression of the spirit seeking the communion of persons, male and female, through a mutual gift of self. “The more lust dominates the heart, the less the heart experiences the nuptial meaning of the body.”

33. Opposition in the Human Heart between the Spirit and the Body

In his General Audience of 30 July 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body. The nuptial meaning of the body is destroyed when man or woman seeks to possess the other as an object, but not when each belongs to the other through self-giving.

34. Sermon on the Mount to the Men of Our Day

In his General Audience of 6 August 1980, the Holy Father, continuing his catechesis on Theology of the Body, examined the the “hardness of heart,” which all men share with Our Lord’s auditors, and its connection with the three-fold lust which is our heritage from Adam.

35. Content of the Commandment: You Shall Not Commit Adultery

In his General Audience of 13 August 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body. He presented Our Lord’s teaching against adultery “in the heart” as a return to the spirit of the law, whose letter had been stretched to allow polygamy.

36. Adultery According to the Law and as Spoken by the Prophets

In his General Audience of 20 August 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body. He examines the emphasis of the matrimonial law on the “procreative end of marriage,” and of the prophets on the uniqueness of the spousal relationship between God and Israel, contrary to the prevailing polygamy.

37. Adultery: A Breakdown of the Personal Covenant

In his General Audience of 27 August 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechetical cycle on Theology of the Body, on the subject of adultery. Adultery is a sin of the body, violating exclusive matrimonial rights between a man and a woman, which constitutes a breakdown of the personal covenant between them.

38. Meaning of Adultery Transferred from the Body to the Heart

In his General Audience of 3 September 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body, focusing on adultery, its place in the Wisdom tradition, and the change in emphasis introduced by Christ.

39. Concupiscence as a Separation From Matrimonial Significance of the Body

In his General Audience of 10 September 1980, the Holy Father continued his series on Theology of the Body. He gave a description of the inner effects of lust from the Wisdom tradition and then compared it with the teaching of Christ on “adultery in the heart.”

40. Mutual Attraction Differs from Lust

In his General Audience of 17 September 1980, the Holy Father continued his analysis of adultery in his series on Theology of the Body. The mutual attraction between a man and a woman, encompassing a “gamut of spiritual-corporal desires,” to which a “proportionate pyramid of values” corresponds, differs from lust, in that the latter reduces the pyramid to one level, sex, as an object of gratification.

41. Depersonalizing Effect of Concupiscence

In his General Audience of 24 September 1980, the Holy Father further examined “adultery in the heart,” spoken of by Our Lord in His Sermon on the Mount. When a woman is looked at lustfully by a man, she ceases to be regarded as a subject of personal attraction or communion, but only as an object of sexual satisfaction. And when this “intention” reaches the will, the man himself becomes enslaved.

42. Establishing the Ethical Sense

In his General Audience of 1 October 1980, the Holy Father continued his analysis of the words of Our Lord, in His Sermon on the Mount, concerning adultery in the heart. It is not merely a matter of lusting after a woman who is not one’s wife, but of looking at her in a way dismissive of her dignity as well as of one’s own.

43. Interpreting the Concept of Concupiscence

In his General Audience of 8 October 1980, the Holy Father concluded his analysis of adultery in the heart, by observing that it is an attitude of a man toward a woman (or vice versa) which reduces the communion of persons to satisfaction of an instinct. One may be guilty of this attitude towards one’s own spouse.

44. Gospel Values and Duties of the Human Heart

In his General Audience of 15 October 1980, the Holy Father continued his analysis of “adultery in the heart” by distinguishing condemnation of lust from a condemnation of the body.

45. Realization of the Value of the Body According to the Plan of the Creator

In his General Audience of 22 October 1980, the Holy Father clarified the meaning of lust, in his catechesis on Theology of the Body. Christ warned against lusting after a woman, not to condemn the body as evil (Manichaeism), but to condemn the devaluation of the body in its nuptial meaning, i.e., the manifestation of communion in spirit.

46. Power of Redeeming Completes Power of Creating

In his General Audience of 29 October 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on “adultery in the heart” by examining the three forms of lust (“of the flesh,” “of the eyes,” and the “pride of life”) spoken of by St. John (1 Jn 2:15-16), in relation to the skewed pictures of man presented by Freud, Marx and Nietzsche. The truth of his humanity, the ability to love, is deeper than the three lusts.

47. Eros and Ethos Meet and Bear Fruit in the Human Heart

In his General Audience of 5 November 1980, the Holy Father explained that the warning of Christ against looking lustfully at a woman is less an accusation than an appeal, that what the heart desires (eros) should also be what is right (ethos).

48. Spontaneity: The Mature Result of Conscience

In his General Audience of 12 November 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body by examining the notion that subjection of an erotic attraction to an ethical form deprives it of its spontaneity.

49. Christ Calls Us to Rediscover the Living Forms of the New Man

In his General Audience of 3 December 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body, with regard to adultery in the heart, by focusing on the ethos of redemption, which calls for temperance in the natural erotic attraction between a man and a woman.

50. Purity of Heart

In his General Audience of 10 December 1980, the Holy Father completed his study of adultery in the heart with a consideration of purity of heart, and how the Lord distinguished this from mere ritual purity.

51. Justification in Christ

In his General Audience of 17 December 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body by examining the conflict between “flesh” and “spirit” in the teaching of St. Paul. The lusts of the worldly man can be overcome by his spirit when empowered by the Holy Spirit.

52. Opposition Between the Flesh and the Spirit

In his General Audience of 7 January 1981, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body by examining St. Paul’s doctrine of justification, and in particular the opposition between life according to the flesh and life according to the Spirit (of God).

53. Life in the Spirit Based on True Freedom

In his General Audience of 14 January 1981, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body by further examination of St. Paul’s teaching on life according to the Spirit. It is purity of heart, which is the necessary condition for charity and true freedom.

54. St. Paul’s Teaching on the Sanctity and Respect of the Human Body

In his General Audience of 28 January 1981, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body by examining St. Paul’s teaching on purity, in 1 Thessalonians 4, that we should control our bodies in holiness and honor.

55. St. Paul’s Description of the Body and Teaching on Purity

In his General Audience of 4 February 1981, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body by examining St. Paul’s teaching on the body from 1 Corinthians 12. The human body is more than the sum of its biological characteristics. It is permeated by the “whole reality of the person and of his dignity.”

56. The Virtue of Purity Is the Expression and Fruit of Life According to the Spirit

In his General Audience of 11 February 1981, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body, by further examining St. Paul’s teaching on purity. It is identifiable as the virtue of temperance, but includes an element of respect for the body, as a temple of the Holy Spirit.

57. The Pauline Doctrine of Purity as Life According to the Spirit

In his General Audience of 18 March 1981, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body by further examination of St. Paul’s teaching on purity. This virtue is reinforced by piety, a gift of the indwelling Holy Spirit, by which God is glorified.

58. Positive Function of Purity of Heart

In his General Audience 1 April 1981, the Holy Father gathered the main threads of his teaching on Theology of the Body, as based on the words of Christ on man’s creation as male and female, and his warning against adultery in the heart. Lust can be displaced only by purity of heart, which, in the teaching of St. Paul, is a gift of the Holy Spirit.

59. Pronouncements of Magisterium Apply Christ’s Words Today

In his General Audience of 8 April 1981, the Holy Father concluded his reflections on the words of Christ, in the Sermon on the Mount, on adultery in the heart. These words are key to the Theology of the Body, which underlies the thinking of many recent magisterial pronouncements.

60. The Human Body, Subject of Works of Art

In his General Audience of 15 April 1981, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body, laying groundwork for a consideration of the human body in aesthetic experience, and how it relates to Our Lord’s warning against looking with lust.

61. Reflections on the Ethos of the Human Body in Works of Artistic Culture

In his General Audience of 22 April 1981, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body, examining the implications of exposure of the human body in artistic culture for the mutual donation of husband and wife.

62. Art Must Not Violate the Right to Privacy

In his General Audience of 29 April 1981, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body by examining the limits beyond which art must not go in depicting masculinity or femininity.

63. Ethical Responsibilities in Art

In his General Audience of 6 May 1981, the Holy Father concluded his reflections on the Sermon on the Mount, concerning adultery in the heart, with respect to artistic depictions of the human body.

64. Marriage and Celibacy in the Light of the Resurrection of the Body

In his General Audience of 11 November 1981, the Holy Father began a new segment of his catechesis on theology of the body, basing his talk on the words of Christ to the Sadducees on the general resurrection. “These words are of fundamental importance for understanding marriage in the Christian sense and also the renunciation of conjugal life for the kingdom of heaven.”

65. The Living God Continually Renews the Very Reality of Life

In his General Audience of 18 November 1981, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on theology of the body, by returning to the words of Christ to the Sadducees on the general resurrection. They deny the resurrection because they doubt the power of God.

66. The Resurrection and Theological Anthropology

In his General Audience of 2 December 1981, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body, by addressing the teaching of Christ on the relationship between male and female after the general resurrection.

67. The Resurrection Perfects the Person

In his General Audience of 9 December 1981, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body, with particular regard for the general resurrection, in which the body will be spiritualized, and both body and spirit divinized, in the vision of God.

68. Christ’s Words on the Resurrection Complete the Revelation of the Body

In his General Audience of 16 December 1981, the Holy Father continued his focus on Christ’s words about our condition after the general resurrection in his catechesis on theology of the body. Each person sharing in the beatific vision will have his own subjectivity perfected, and yet, in view of the Communion of the Trinity, experience a new depth of intersubjectivity which is the Communion of Saints. It will be virginal, and yet reveal the full nuptial meaning of the body, as a gift to God first, and through Him to others.

69. New Threshold of Complete Truth About Man

In his General Audience of 13 January 1982, the Holy Father continued his exposition of the words of Christ on the general resurrection, as applied to Theology of the Body. In some way difficult to imagine, the meaning of the human body will be revealed as the means of mutual self-giving in the communion of Saints.

70. Doctrine of the Resurrection according to St. Paul

In his General Audience of 27 January 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body by further examining St. Paul’s teaching, in 1 Corinthians 15, on the general resurrection. The resurrection of the body completes man’s redemption from the effects of sin.

71. The Risen Body Will Be Incorruptible, Glorious, Dynamic, and Spiritual

In his General Audience of 3 February 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body, by describing the body, at the general resurrection, as the fulfillment of the human aspiration to glory. This aspiration reflects the potentiality with which we were created to become conformed to the risen Christ.

72. Body’s Spiritualization Will Be Source of Its Power and Incorruptibility

In his General Audience of 10 February 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body by concluding his study of St. Paul’s teaching on the general resurrection. Resurrected man, no longer weakened through his resistance to the Spirit, will be fully vivified, attaining the fullness for which he was created.

73. Virginity or Celibacy for the Sake of the Kingdom

In his General Audience of 10 March 1982, the Holy Father began a new series on virginity/celibacy for the kingdom of heaven, in furtherance of his catechesis on theology of the body. A vocation to celibacy is an anticipation of that eschatological state when men “neither marry nor are given in marriage.”

74. The Vocation to Continence in This Earthly Life

In his General Audience of 17 March 1982, the Holy Father continued his talks on celibacy/virginity for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. This new ideal, though a departure from the Old Testament tradition of marriage, shed light on the theology of the body.

75. Continence for the Sake of the Kingdom Meant to Have Spiritual Fulfillment

In his General Audience of 24 March 1982, the Holy Father continued his talks on celibacy/virginity for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. It is a charismatic sign that in heaven people will no longer marry, because God will be everything to everyone. Departure from the Old Testament tradition of marriage and procreation was effected especially by the example of Christ himself.

76. The Effective and Privileged Way of Continence

In his General Audience of 31 March 1982, the Holy Father continued his talks on celibacy/virginity for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. Marriage is not depreciated, but continence has an exceptional value, when chosen with a supernatural motive.

77. Superiority of Continence Does Not Devalue Marriage

In his General Audience of 7 April 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on theology of the body, addressing the superiority of continence. It is superior to marriage, not based not on any devaluation of sexuality or of the human body, but on the motive for which continence is chosen, viz., the kingdom of heaven.

78. Marriage and Continence Complement Each Other

In his General Audience of 14 April 1982, the Holy Father continued his instruction on the relationship between marriage and continence. Those called to either state fulfill their calling in a spiritual paternity or maternity toward those in their care. And the nature of both is conjugal, being expressed in the total gift of oneself.

79. The Value of Continence Is Found in Love

In his General Audience of 21 April 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body, with regard to the choice of virginity or celibacy. Continence for the sake of the Kingdom of Heaven is the nuptial gift of self to Christ, the Spouse of the soul.

80. Celibacy Is a Particular Response to the Love of the Divine Spouse

In his General Audience of 28 April 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body by further explaining continence for the sake of the Kingdom of Heaven as the particular response of virginity/celibacy to the self-gift of the divine Spouse in the Paschal and Eucharistic Mystery.

81. Celibacy for the Kingdom Affirms Marriage

In his General Audience of 5 May 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body, by concluding his considerations on Christ’s words recommending continence for the sake of the Kingdom of Heaven. Renunciation of marriage for the sake of the Kingdom affirms the value of what is renounced, in the gift of self to God.

82. Voluntary Continence Derives From a Counsel, Not From a Command

In his General Audience of 23 June 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body, by addressing St. Paul’s treatment of virginity and marriage. Consecrated virginity is a matter of counsel, not command, so that marriage is no sin, though voluntary virginity is better.

83. The Unmarried Person Is Anxious to Please the Lord

In his General Audience of 30 June 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body, by examining St. Paul’s statement in 1 Corinthians 7, that one who marries does well, but one who chooses continence or virginity does better. Continence makes more room to be anxious for “the things of the Lord,” to please the Lord and work for the growth of His Church.

84. Everyone Has His Own Gift from God, Suited to His Vocation

In his General Audience of 7 July 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body, by further examination of St. Paul’s statement that it is better to choose continence than to marry. While the gift of continence allows an undivided love for God, the grace of marriage is a true gift, suited to that state in life.

85. The Kingdom of God, Not the World, Is Man’s Eternal Destiny

In his General Audience of 14 July 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body. He further examined St. Paul’s teaching on the complementarity of continence and marriage, both vocations having in view the future life.

86. Mystery of the Body’s Redemption Basis of Teaching on Marriage and Voluntary Continence

In his General Audience of 21 July 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body. The eschatological redemption of the body, in victory over death, is the inspiration for man’s victory over sin in daily life, whether in marriage or in celibacy.

87. Marital Love Reflects God’s Love for His People

In his General Audience of 28 July 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on theology of the body by laying the groundwork for an examination of St. Paul’s teaching on marriage in the fifth chapter of Ephesians. Marriage, as a sacrament, signifies the relationship between Christ and His Church, and before that, the spousal love between God and his chosen people.

88. The Call to Be Imitators of God and to Walk in Love

In his General Audience of 4 August 1982, the Holy Father continued his examination of the fifth chapter of Ephesians as part of his ongoing catechesis on theology of the body. The prescriptions for family relationships should be understood in light of the Apostle’s teaching on the Christian vocation.

89. Reverence for Christ the Basis of Relationship Between Spouses

In his General Audience of 11 August 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on theology of the body, by examining more closely the right relationship between husband and wife as described in the fifth chapter of the Letter to the Ephesians.

90. A Deeper Understanding of the Church and Marriage

In his General Audience of 18 August 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on theology of the body, looking more closely at the two-way analogy found in Ephesians 5, between the relationship of husband and wife and the relationship of Christ and His Church.

91. St Paul’s Analogy of the Union of Head and Body

In his General Audience of 25 August 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on theology of the body, by further examination of Ephesians 5. He focussed attention on the analogy of head and body, as analogous to both the Christ-Church relationship and the husband-wife relationship.

92. Sacredness of the Human Body and Marriage

In his General Audience of 1 September 1982, the Holy Father infers the sacredness of the human body from the analogy of love in Ephesians 5, between Christ for His Church and a husband for his wife.

93. Christ’s Redemptive Love Has Spousal Nature

In his General Audience of 8 September 1982, the Holy Father continued his exposition of the fifth chapter of Ephesians, focusing on the meaning of the word “mystery,” as it applies to God’s plan, its revelation in Christ, Christ’s relationship to the Church, and the sacraments of the Church.

94. Moral Aspects of the Christian’s Vocation

In his General Audience of 15 September 1982, the Holy Father continued his exposition of the fifth chapter of Ephesians, by showing how the mystery of God’s love, hidden for ages, was revealed in Jesus Christ, with an emphasis on his spousal donation of Himself to the Church and His members’ participation in the mystery.

95. Relationship of Christ to the Church Connected With the Tradition of the Prophets

In his General Audience of 22 September 1982, the Holy Father, in light of Ephesians 5, compared the relationship of Christ with His Church to the relationship, described by the Old Testament Prophets, of God with Israel. Whereas, in Isaiah, God is Israel’s spouse as her Maker, in Ephesians, Christ is the Church’s spouse as her Redeemer.

96. Analogy of Spousal Love Indicates the Radical Character of Grace

In his General Audience of 29 September 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on theology of the body by further examination of the spousal relationship between Christ and His Church in Ephesians 5. Of the various biblical analogies of the mystery of God’s love, the marriage analogy most emphasizes God’s gift of Himself to His people.

97. Marriage Is the Central Point of the Sacrament of Creation

In his General Audience of 6 October 1982, the Holy Father continued his exposition of fifth chapter of the Letter to the Ephesians, for the light it sheds on marriage as the “primordial” sacrament in the state of man’s original innocence.

98. Loss of Original Sacrament Restored with Redemption in Marriage-Sacrament

In his General Audience of 13 October 1982, Pope John Paul II continued his exposition of the fifth chapter of the Letter to the Ephesians, by relating Christ’s redemptive love to marriage as instituted in the beginning, when it was a sacrament of God’s gift of Himself to man and woman at their creation.

99. Marriage an Integral Part of New Sacramental Economy

In his General Audience of 20 October 1982, the Holy Father continued his commentary on Ephesians 5, to give further insights into his Theology of the Body. Marriage is so fundamental to the order of redemption established by Christ that “all the sacraments of the new covenant find their prototype in marriage as the primordial sacrament.”

100. Indissolubility of Sacrament of Marriage in Mystery of the Redemption of the Body

In his General Audience of 27 October 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on marriage in light of Ephesians 5. Man and woman becoming one flesh in marriage, as signifying the relationship between Christ and His Church, is a sign of the redemption of the body at the end of time.

101. Christ Opened Marriage to the Saving Action of God

In his General Audience of 24 November 1982, the Holy Father reexamined Ephesians 5 in light of the words of the Gospel, in which Christ, speaking to the Pharisees and in the Sermon on the Mount, confirmed marriage as a sacrament instituted by the Creator at the beginning. It is the sign of God’s original covenant, according to which man, both male and female, would be sanctified and adopted by God.

102. Marriage Sacrament an Effective Sign of God’s Saving Power

In his General Audience of 1 December 1982, the Holy Father drew together texts from the Gospel, Romans, and I Corinthians to shed further light on marriage as presented in Ephesians 5. This primordial sacrament prepares for the eschatological hope of the general resurrection in procreating sons and daughters who are to participate in the resurrection, and thus experience the redemption of the body.

103. The Redemptive and Spousal Dimensions of Love

In his general audience of 15 December 1982, the Holy Father continued his commentary on Ephesians 5, for further insights into marriage and the Theology of the Body. The original structure of marriage, as a sacrament of creation, “is renewed in the mystery of the redemption, when that mystery assumes the aspect of the spousal love of the Church on the part of Christ.”

104. The Substratum and Content of the Sacramental Sign of Spousal Communion

In his General Audience of 5 January 1983, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body by analyzing the sign (form) of the sacrament of marriage into two aspects: the expression of the will to be united (the wedding vows), and the actual union when the marriage is consummated.

105. The Language of the Body in the Structure of Marriage

In his General Audience of 12 January 1983, the Holy Father analyzed the sacramentality of marriage under the aspect of a sign. The sign is expressed in the language of the body, in its masculinity or femininity, as a personal gift to its spouse.

106. The Sacramental Covenant in the Dimension of Sign

In his General Audience of 19 January 1983, the Holy Father explains that the sign of the Sacrament of Marriage is constituted by the words of matrimonial consent, “because the spousal significance of the body in its masculinity and femininity is found expressed in them.” In giving their consent, the spouses confirm their participation in the “prophetic mission of the Church received from Christ.”

107. Language of the Body Strengthens the Marriage Covenant

In his General Audience of 26 January 1983, the Holy Father continued his analysis of the “language of the body” as expressed in the marriage covenant between spouses. They “reread” the language of the body in their living together as a communion of persons.

108. Man Called to Overcome Concupiscence

In his General Audience of 9 February 1983, the Holy Father continued his analysis of the “language of the body,” expressed in the marriage covenant, but now with consideration of its misreading in the man of concupiscence. He/she is called by Christ to return from sin to chastity in rereading the truth of the body in the mystery of redemption.

109. Return to the Subject of Human Love in the Divine Plan

In his General Audience of 23 May 1984, the Holy Father (after a hiatus devoted to reflections on the Holy Year) resumed his treatment of the topic of human love in the divine plan. He began an analysis of the Song of Songs, situating it within the tradition of marital love reaching back to Genesis. It is the sign of the covenant made by God with man in the beginning.

110. Truth and Freedom the Foundation of True Love

In his General Audience of 30 May 1984, the Holy Father continued his analysis of the Song of Songs for further examination of the sacramental sign of marriage. It is expressed in the “language of the body,” which begins in the heart. It reflects the familiarity of friendship, but also the mystery of a woman’s interior inviolability, which is freely given to the man.

111. Love Is Ever Seeking and Never Satisfied

In his General Audience of 6 June 1984, the Holy Father continued his analysis of the Song of Songs in connection with his catechesis on Theology of the Body. On the basis of a love which is both spiritual and sensual, the significance of the body is reread, and their union becomes the sign of the mutual gift of self.

112. Love Is Victorious in the Struggle Between Good and Evil

In his General Audience of 27 June 1984, the Holy Father examined the Book of Tobit for the light it sheds on Theology of the Body. Here the devotion of the spouses is expressed not in words of loving transport, as in the Song of Songs, but in the “choices and the actions that take on all the weight of human existence in the union of the two.”

113. The Language of the Body: Actions and Duties Forming the Spirituality of Marriage

In his General Audience of 4 July 1984, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body. He returned to the fifth chapter of Ephesians to examine how the “language of the body” is elevated by the language of liturgy to a “great mystery,” the Sacrament of Matrimony.

114. Morality of Marriage Act Determined by Nature of the Act and of the Subjects

In his General Audience of 11 July 1984, the Holy Father turned to reflections on Paul VI’s Humanae Vitae as an application of his catechesis on the theology of human love in God’s plan. He spoke on the inseparable connection “between the unitive significance and the procreative significance which are both inherent to the marriage act.”

115. The Norm of Humanae Vitae Arises from the Natural Law and the Revealed Order

In his General Audience of 18 July 1984, the Holy Father continued his exposition of the Encyclical, Humanae Vitae, observing that its moral norm–marital openness to procreation–not only accords with natural law (reason) and the revealed moral law, but finds support in the Theology of the Body.

116. Importance of Harmonizing Human Love with Respect for Life

In his General Audience of 25 July 1984, the Holy Father continued his reflections, linking Humanae Vitae with the theology of human love in God’s plan. The Theology of the Body, offering confirmation of the moral norm in the Encyclical, prepares us to consider more deeply, from a pastoral perspective, the difficulty of complying with the norm.

117. Responsible Parenthood

In his general audience of 1 August 1984, the Holy Father continued his analysis of Humanae Vitae in light of Gaudium et Spes, underlining the principle that, while responsible parenthood follows the dictates of conscience, conscience must conform to the “objective moral order instituted by God.”

118. Faithfulness to the Divine Plan in the Transmission of Life

In his general audience of 8 August 1984, the Holy Father continued his analysis of Humanae Vitae, in comparing natural regulation of fertility with contraception. There is an essential difference between the two, the former following the lead of nature, the latter obstructing it.

119. Church’s Position on Transmission of Life

At his General Audience of 22 August 1984, the Holy Father continued his reflections on Humanae Vitae, by focussing on the “essence of the Church’s doctrine on the transmission of life.” The language of the body, in order to be true, as conforming to the moral order, should signify not only the unitive aspect, but the procreative aspect, of marriage.

120. A Discipline That Ennobles Human Love

In his General Audience of 28 August 1984, the Holy Father continued his reflections on Humanae Vitae, turning his attention to natural regulation of fertility, which is consistent with responsible parenthood, though artificial contraception is not.

121. Responsible Parenthood Linked to Moral Maturity

In his general audience of 5 September 1984, the Holy Father continued his exposition of the Church’s teaching on natural regulation of fertility, in light of Humanae Vitae and Familiaris Consortio. It is the ethical dimension, in the virtue of temperance, that prevents this method from becoming just another form of contraception.

122. Prayer, Penance and the Eucharist: Principal Sources of Spirituality for Married Couples

In his General Audience of 3 October 1984, the Holy Father continued his exposition of Humanae Vitae, showing the relationship between the “honest practice of fertility regulation” and the “Christian spirituality of the conjugal vocation and life.”

123. The Power of Love Is Given to Man and Woman as a Share in God’s Love

In his General Audience of 10 October 1984, the Holy Father continued his exposition of Humanae Vitae, as it bore on his Theology of the Body. The love that God gives to husband and wife is a supernatural power enabling them to coordinate their actions toward the good of marriage, a communion of persons, while safeguarding the connection between the “two meanings of the conjugal act,” the unitive and the procreative.

124. Continence Protects the Dignity of the Conjugal Act

In his General Audience of 24 October 1984, the Holy Father gave close examination to the virtue of continence, in light of the teaching of Humanae Vitae. Continence in marriage not only resists concupiscence, but enlarges the capacity of husband and wife to love each other.

125. Continence Frees One from Inner Tension

In his General Audience of 31 October 1984, the Holy Father continued his treatment of the virtue of continence in light of the teaching of Humanae Vitae. He distinguished between excitement, which tends toward the conjugal act, and emotion which is an affectionate response to the masculinity or femininity of the marital partner. Continence gives direction to both.

126. Continence Deepens Personal Communion

At the General Audience on 7 November 1984, Pope John Paul II continued his analysis of the virtue of continence in light of Humanae Vitae. The virtue of continence has “not only the capacity to contain bodily and sensual reactions, but even more the capacity to control and guide man’s whole sensual and emotive sphere.”

127. Christian Spirituality of Marriage by Living According to the Spirit

In his General Audience of 14 November 1984, the Holy Father continued his exposition of Humanae Vitae for the light it sheds on the role of chastity in married life. The virtue of chastity not only regulates manifestations of affection, but opens the couple to the gifts of the Holy Spirit, by which they are enabled to achieve a communion of persons.

128. Respect for the Work of God

In his General Audience of 21 November 1984, the Holy Father traced an outline of conjugal spirituality, based on the teaching of Humanae Vitae. He explained the gift of piety, respect for the work of God, with particular reference to the significance of the conjugal act, “its dignity and the consequent serious responsibility connected with it.”

129. Conclusion to the Series: Redemption of the Body and Sacramentality of Marriage

In his General Audience of 28 November 1984, the Holy Father concluded his four-year catechesis on Theology of the Body with a summary of his conclusions. His catechesis was divided into two parts: the first was a study of Christ’s words on marriage and their implications for the redemption of the body, and the second, an analysis of the sacramentality of marriage as presented in Ephesians 5, with added insights from Humanae Vitae.

©The Theology of the Body. All rights reserved.

Biden’s Strategy to Fight Anti-Semitism Enables Hatred of Jews and Israel thumbnail

Biden’s Strategy to Fight Anti-Semitism Enables Hatred of Jews and Israel

By Jihad Watch

BDS, leftist and Muslim anti-Semitism can’t be talked about.


In 2019, President Trump signed an executive order on combating antisemitism. The order used the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance definition of antisemitism which includes “denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination”, “using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism to characterize Israel” and applying double standards to the Jewish State.

Biden’s hyped U.S. National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism, released on the eve of the Shavuot holiday, backtracks from this gold standard by claiming that, “there are several definitions of antisemitism, which serve as valuable tools to raise awareness and increase understanding of antisemitism”, including the IHRA, but noting that the Biden administration “welcomes and appreciates the Nexus Document and notes other such efforts.”

The Nexus definition was authored by anti-Israel activists like Tema Smith, who had claimed that, “Hamas — and the Palestinians as a whole — have desperately real and legitimate grievances against Israel.”

“Jews *have* to be ok with Palestinians *explaining* why some turn to terrorism,” she argued.

The Nexus advisory committee included the likes of Hussein Ibish, who had described Hezbollah as a “disciplined and responsible liberation force” whose terrorists had “conducted themselves in an exemplary manner”, along with J Street leader Jeremy Ben Ami, Lila Corwin-Berman, who had defended BDS, and Chaim Seidler-Feller, whose hatred was so intense he had kicked and scratched a Jewish woman over her support for the Jewish State.

The Nexus definition of antisemitism was created to protect anti-Israel activists from charges of antisemitism. That definition, which the Biden administration chose to promote, claims that BDS, or “boycotting goods made in the West Bank and/or Israel is not antisemitic”, and argues that, “opposition to Zionism and/or Israel does not necessarily reflect specific anti-Jewish animus nor purposefully lead to antisemitic behaviors and conditions” and defends double standards by contending that “paying disproportionate attention to Israel and treating Israel differently than other countries is not prima facie proof of antisemitism.”

While the U.S. National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism claims that the IHRA definition is the most prominent, that is not the same as an endorsement and the strategy carefully avoids any mention of BDS and beyond its opening has relatively few mentions of Israel. Despite being hyped by Jewish Democrats, it is undeniably a step back from the Trump executive order.

Even with the seemingly strong language cited by administration supporters, such as “when Israel is singled out because of anti-Jewish hatred, that is antisemitism”, the ‘conditional’ in that sentence is clearly a lawyerly use of the Nexus, not the IHRA definition, defining hatred of Israel only as antisemitism when it can be proven to have originated because of antisemitism.

Incorporating the Nexus defense of BDS and hatred of Israel is a symptom of a larger problem.

The U.S. National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism insists that the only kind of antisemitism is white supremacism or “right-wing” hatred. Its only references to leftist, black, or Muslim antisemitism are cautiously indirect because those forms of antisemitism cannot be condemned.

After multiple Muslim and black nationalist terrorist attacks on synagogues, Muslims and black nationalists are only mentioned as allies and fellow victims of white supremacist bigotry.

The strategy states that, “antisemitic conspiracy theories are often foundational to white supremacy as well as numerous other violent extremist ideologies. For example, in January 2022, an armed hostage-taker motivated by other violent notions terrorized the members of a synagogue in Colleyville, Texas.” The “other violent notions” were Islamic ones.

Malik Faisal Akram, a Muslim Pakistani supporter of ‘Lady Al Qaeda’, broke into the synagogue and held the people inside hostage until he was shot and killed by the FBI. Al Qaeda later called Akram a “martyr” and declared that “there Is no greater enemy of Islam and inhabitants of Islam than the Jews”.

When a national antisemitism strategy can’t even name and describe an Al Qaeda attack on a synagogue because it would undermine its premise that Muslims can only be victims and that the only threat worth discussing is white supremacy then it’s the problem, not the solution.

If the Biden administration won’t even allow a mention of the most violent kind of Islamic antisemitism by a supporter of a terror group we are at war with, it’s collaborating with it.

Literally.

The U.S. National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism.rollout press release boasts that “the Council on American-Islamic Relations will launch a tour to educate religious communities about steps they can take to protect their houses of worship from hate incidents.”

That’s the same CAIR which has defended Islamic terrorism against Jews, defended Muslim terrorists who plotted attacks on synagogues, whose official, Zahra Billoo, had urged, “we need to pay attention to the Zionist synagogues”, and which was named an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation trial involving the funding of Hamas.

When Ahmed Ferhani was arrested for a plot to attack a synagogue, CAIR held a rally to support him. It still has materials on its site defending the antisemitic terrorist.

After promoting an antisemite’s definition of antisemitism, the Biden administration is promoting synagogue bombers to tour and educate houses of worship about security measures.

There are good things about the U.S. National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism. It does address campus antisemitism, acknowledging that, “on college campuses, Jewish students, educators, and administrators have been derided, ostracized, and sometimes discriminated against because of their actual or perceived views on Israel.” But it fails to note that the antisemitism is coming from Islamists and leftists, and its focus on “swastikas” and “Kristallnacht” implies the familiar white supremacist narrative even when, in one case, the Nazi reference was actually being employed by a Muslim woman.

The strategy does mention that beyond learning about the Holocaust, students should also learn the “histories of antisemitism experienced by Sephardic and Mizrahi Jews—who trace their ancestry to Spain, the Middle East, and North Africa—and their stories of exclusion, persecution, and expulsion.” And that is a good thing, American Jewish historiography has been dominated for too long by Ashkenazi or European Jewish history, but how will it be possible to teach about Muslim antisemitism without even mentioning Islam?

Even though Orthodox Jews have been the victims of the majority of violent physical assaults, there is only one brief mention of this phenomenon, “some traditionally observant Jews, especially traditional Orthodox Jews, are victimized while walking down the street.”

Inconveniently, the attackers tend to be black or other minorities, and so cannot be mentioned.

The black nationalist massacre at a Kosher grocery store in Jersey City and a machete attack at a synagogue in 2019 go completely unmentioned, even though they were among the deadliest recent attacks on Jews along with the white supremacist terrorist attack in Poway, California.

A better name for the new approach would be the U.S. National Strategy to Counter Those Kinds of Antisemitism We Are Willing to Discuss while leaving out the majority of violent antisemitic threats and avoiding the question of Israel as much as it possibly can.

The U.S. National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism is crippled by the woke dependency on intersectionality, on the need to view antisemitism as interrelated with other prejudices and bigotries, and to position Jews as common victims and allies against white supremacy, and in the process it ignores what antisemitism actually is and what is unique about it. And that approach has actually ended up enabling leftist antisemitism over the 20th century.

Anitsemitism is not simply a racial or religious hatred. The attempts to narrowly define it run aground on its persistence across thousands of years, through different cultures, religions, and nations. Antisemitism morphs, adopting different shapes and forms, emerging in radically different political movements across both the Left and the Right, to form a common denominator. The Biden strategy seeks to compartmentalize antisemitism within a postmodern rainbow coalition of minority victims faced with the bigotry of a majority, even as the document is forced to awkwardly grapple with the fact that much of the hatred is coming from minorities.

At best that’s denial and at worst that’s complicity.

The U.S. National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism isn’t a strategy to fight antisemitism, but to cover up the reality of it as a politically inconvenient reality with a politically convenient myth. And no one should have expected anything else from a radical administration with no shortage of antisemitic nominees, which continues to undermine Israel while supporting hate groups like CAIR. Whether it’s Nexus or the U.S. National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism, putting the enablers of antisemitism in charge of defining and fighting antisemitism can never end well.

AUTHOR

DANIEL GREENFIELD

RELATED ARTICLES:

Jewish groups, Allies Demand CUNY Law Lose Funding After Hijab-Wearing Jew-hater ‘Vile’ Antisemitic Commencement Speech

Biden tells Turkey to allow Sweden into NATO if it wants US F-16’s

Palestinian Campaign to Free Sadistic Murderer Walid Daqqa

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

California school district refuses to revise pro-jihad, anti-Israel curriculum endorsed by Hamas-linked CAIR thumbnail

California school district refuses to revise pro-jihad, anti-Israel curriculum endorsed by Hamas-linked CAIR

By Jihad Watch

And as these tools endorse genocidal jihad violence, they actually think they’re righteous.

Superintendent Says District Has ‘No Intention’ To Remove Any ‘Narrative’ From Anti-Israel Curriculum

by Kate Anderson, Daily Caller News Foundation, May 24, 2023:

Santa Ana Unified School District (SAUSD) Superintendent Jerry Almendarez said Tuesday that the board would not be removing any “narrative” from its new ethnic studies curriculum, despite complaints of its anti-Israel rhetoric.

SAUSD approved two courses, “Ethnic Studies: World Geography” and “Ethnic Studies World Histories” in April, which have been criticized for promoting the idea that Israel is a “colonial empire” and guilty of the “ethnic cleansing” of Palestinians. The SAUSD board held a regularly scheduled meeting Tuesday, and after giving out several end-of-the-year awards to faculty and students, Almendarez addressed concerns about the recently passed ethnic studies curriculum, according to recordings of the meeting on the district’s YouTube account.

“First I want to address some comments and concerns regarding our newly adopted ethnic studies curriculum,” Armendarez said. “We recognize as a district that this complex content requires careful consideration and should be viewed through multiple perspectives. Comments have been shared with the district that we are looking to eliminate certain perspectives and narratives from our curriculum. I want the public to know that the district has no intentions of removing any narrative from the curriculum that will be developed in the future. Our intent is to listen to all sides, to learn from all sides, and to approach this in a balanced manner.”

Several public commenters thanked the board for sticking with the curriculum, with one saying that it was “historically accurate and morally correct.” Another commenter identified himself as a Ph.D. student at the University of California Davis, saying that Palestinians were “forced into exile” by Israel while accusing the board of being too “cowardly” to stand up to the Zionist movement if they decided to back down from the curriculum.

Prior to the meeting, several groups, including the Council for American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and the Palestinian Youth Movement (PYM), urged district members to show up and voice support for the curriculum. CAIR’s Los Angeles chapter put out a press release on May 19, arguing that Israel’s “ethnic cleansing” of Palestinians is a “factual description” of the Jewish state’s handling of the situation in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.

PYM argued in an Instagram post on Tuesday that…“The Santa Ana Unified School District has come under pressure from Zionists to remove its comprehensive Palestinian history section from its Ethnic Studies program,” the group wrote in the post’s caption.”We are asking community members to raise the call against this clear attempt to remove both Palestine and Ethnic Studies more broadly from our school curriculums.

The ethnic studies would have students read articles and watch videos describing Israel as an apartheid state, while claiming that the Jews have committed “war crimes” against Palestinians, according to the curriculum. Students would be asked questions such as how “the settlement of Israelis after WWII changed … the sovereignty of Palestinians over time” and how the Israeli “blockade” of Gaza “affect[s] the livelihoods of the Palestinians in that region?”…

Read more.

AUTHOR

ROBERT SPENCER

RELATED ARTICLES:

Giving Low Ratings to Disney’s Black Little Mermaid Movie is ‘Ratings Terrorism’

CUNY Law School features hijab-wearing Jew-hater as its commencement speaker

Austria: Thousands of Muslims scream ‘Allahu akbar’ and celebrate Erdogan’s victory

Turkey: Erdogan supporters celebrate his victory by screaming ‘Allahu akbar’ inside Hagia Sophia

Sweden: Muslim migrant rapes child, Court of Appeal says it’s ‘not a serious crime’

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Most Churchgoers Are Optimistic, Take Pride in Their Church: Poll thumbnail

Most Churchgoers Are Optimistic, Take Pride in Their Church: Poll

By Family Research Council

Although U.S. church attendance has fallen to historic lows, the faithful still congregating have found a new source of optimism and pride in America’s sanctuaries, a new poll finds.

Though fewer Americans darken a church door or believe in God, nearly all those who do say they believe their faith has a bright future and have few qualms identifying with their church in the public square. The left-leaning Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI) interviewed 5,872 people last April through August, asking them about their religious views and participation. The results, published May 16 in a study titled “Religion and Congregations in a Time of Social and Political Upheaval,” reported a mix of results that nearly all came out positive for those who stay in church.

Although 82% of church-goers say they are optimistic about the future of their church, evangelicals and members of numerically small groups such as Eastern Orthodox Christians are most likely to say they are “very optimistic” that the Christian faith will see brighter days.

“On one hand, it makes sense that those who attend church have more confidence in the future of the church. They continue to attend, because they’re happy about it. But that’s probably not all that’s going on here,” Joseph Backholm, senior fellow for Biblical Worldview and Strategic Engagement at Family Research Council, told The Washington Stand. “It’s much easier to criticize people you have a safe distance from,” and “the bad news often gets the headlines,” Backholm told TWS — a problem that can only be solved by “consistent engagement with the church.”

“The closer you are, the more likely it is that you’ll see the lives being changed by the gospel,” he said.

Those who regularly attend worship services also seem to exude generosity. Many believe their church is in good financial shape, although the report found that “Republican churchgoers (38%) are notably more likely than Democratic (33%) and independent (33%) churchgoers to say their church is better off financially than other churches.”

For regular congregants, their faith becomes a cherished part of their personality, giving them a sense of belonging and well-being. Nearly all church attendees (89%) told PRRI they are proud to be associated with their church. Again, evangelicals and members of smaller Christian denominations proved most likely to say they feel pride “completely” and have no reservations about publicly claiming their church affiliation. They are also more likely to be content with their current church leadership when compared with Roman Catholics and mainline Protestants.

The sense of identity and belonging is but one benefit of church attendance, polls have found. Americans who believe in God and highly value marriage are more likely to be “very happy” than agnostics, atheists, or isolated individuals, according to a Wall Street Journal-NORC poll taken in March. Only 12% of Americans say they are “very happy,” but 68% of the most joyful citizens say they believe in God.

But church attendance has become an increasingly endangered activity in progressively secular America, PRRI and numerous other studies have confirmed.

About half of all Americans firmly believe in God, according to NORC’s 2022 General Social Survey, which was released on May 17. As a result, many parents raise their children without “saying night[ly] prayers, morning prayers, taking their kids to church,” Thomas Groome, a professor in Theology and Religious Education at Boston College, told The Hill.

The new report confirmed the ongoing trend of religious disaffiliation. PRRI found that white Christians made up 42% of the U.S. population in 2022, down from 72% in 1990. Christians from other ethnicities make up 25% of the U.S. population. One in four Americans now belongs to the religiously unaffiliated, or “Nones,” while 6% of the population adheres to a non-Christian religion.

Confusingly, one in five Americans (19%) professes to be “a follower of the teachings or practices of more than one religion,” adopting syncretism as a guiding philosophy. Non-Christians, Hispanic Catholics, and white mainline Protestants were most likely to fall into that category.

The decreasing number of believers creates a decline in the importance of religion in American society. One in every six Americans (16%) say their religion is “the most important thing in their lives.” White evangelicals are the most likely to put faith first (42%), followed by black Protestants (38%), and other Christians (37%).

The poll also found a major reversal in church, synagogue, or mosque attendance happened during the post-COVID era: In 2019, a majority of Americans attended services at least once a few times a year. But by 2022 most Americans (57%) said they attend religious services “seldom” or “never,” up from 45% just four years ago.

Empty pews are feeding the nation’s “epidemic of loneliness and isolation,” said Biden administration Surgeon General Vivek Murthy in a government advisory released earlier this month. Persistent loneliness, Murthy wrote, had the same impact on physical health as smoking 15 cigarettes a day — but attending the church of your choice each Sunday morning may help improve people’s well-being.

“Religious or faith-based groups can be a source for regular social contact, serve as a community of support, provide meaning and purpose, create a sense of belonging around shared values and beliefs, and are associated with reduced risk-taking behaviors,” Murthy said. “As a consequence of” the “decline in participation” by Americans in church worship services, “individuals’ health may be undermined.”

While belief and church attendance are down, PRRI still detects vibrancy and activity below the surface. The number of people who converted to their current faith or denominational membership increased by five points in one year, up to 24% in 2022. Non-Christians and evangelicals were least likely to convert away from their own faith background.

They may be rejoicing in their newfound faith — or experiencing a host of well-attested benefits, especially for the most isolated, such as elderly women.

Eliezer Schnall, an assistant professor at Yeshiva University, interviewed 92,539 post-menopausal women and found those who attend church were 56% more likely to have an optimistic life outlook and were 27% less likely to be depressed than those who do not.

The women, many of whom were elderly or alone, reported experiencing multiple kinds of help from their church membership: “emotional support and informational support,” by speaking with a pastor, priest, or rabbi about challenging life issues; “tangible support,” such as finding someone to help them attend to household chores; and “affectionate support” and “positive interaction” with other people.

The 2012 study, published in the Journal of Religion and Public Health, also examined the idea of “social strain”: the notion that people who attend church services receive benefits only with deeper costs.

Schnall asked the women, all of whom were over age 50, whether people important to them “get on your nerves,” “ask too much of you,” or “try to get you to do things that you do not want to do.”

“We did not find that those who attend religious services where characterized by additional social strain,” Schnall told CNN.

Christians do not gather to experience health, wealth, and happiness, Backholm emphasized: They come based on God’s commandments to render thanks, praise, and worship to Jesus Christ. “Our engagement with the local church is first an act of obedience, but the benefit of obedience is that it makes our life better,” Backholm told TWS. “We’ll be happy when we’re connected in community to other people and serving others, and we’ll make others happier, as well.”

“As always, we end up being the greatest beneficiaries of our obedience.”

AUTHOR

Ben Johnson

Ben Johnson is senior reporter and editor at The Washington Stand.

RELATED ARTICLE: Less Religion, More Evangelism!

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2023 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

Saint John Paul II’s Theology of the Body thumbnail

Saint John Paul II’s Theology of the Body

By Dr. Rich Swier



“God created man in his own image; in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them.” — Genesis 1:27


Pope John Paul II, born Karol Józef Wojtya, was the head of the Catholic Church and sovereign of the Vatican City State from 1978 until his death in 2005. He was the first non-Italian pope since Adrian VI in the 16th century and the third longest-serving pope after Pius IX and St. Peter.

He was beatified as Pope Saint John Paul II on May 1st, 2011.

The following is his “Theology of the Body” based upon a series of 129 lectures he gave. It covers what it means to be a male and female created by God, the Father. It covers our responsibilities and duties as a father, mother, and followers of Christ Jesus.


Theology of the Body

NOTE: Each chapter is provided with a synopsis of its message. To read the full chapter please click on the title.

1. Of the Unity and Indissolubility of Marriage

On 5 September 1979, in the first of his General Audiences on the Theology of the Body, the Holy Father expounded the words of Christ, “In the beginning the Creator made them male and female.”

2. Biblical Account of Creation Analysed

In his General Audience of 12 September 1979, the Holy Father compared two accounts of man’s creation from Genesis, establishing basic principles for his study of the Theology of the Body.

3. The Second Account of Creation: The Subjective Definition of Man

In his General Audience of 19 September 1979, the Holy Father examined the account of man’s creation in the second chapter of Genesis, observing its profundity in revealing the subjective side of creation in the image of God.

4. Boundary Between Original Innocence and Redemption

In his General Audience on 26 September 1979, the Holy Father considered a continuity between man’s state of original innocence and the state of original sin, which left him open to the grace of redemption.

5. Meaning of Man’s Original Solitude

In his General Audience on 10 October 1979, the Holy Father examined man’s solitude, not as male, distinct from female, but in his nature as distinct from other living things, his difference in superiority, revealed to him in his self-consciousness.

6. Man’s Awareness of Being a Person

In his General Audience on 24 October 1979, the Holy Father linked “man’s original solitude,” as different from and superior to other living creatures, with consciousness of his body.

7. In the Very Definition of Man, the Alternative Between Death and Immortality

In his General Audience on 31 October 1979, the Holy Father addressed again the solitude in which man was created, in relation to other creatures, but also with regard to his freedom of moral choice. The alternatives of death and immortality lay with him.

8. Original Unity of Man and Woman

In his General Audience of 7 November 1979, the Holy Father continued to lay groundwork for his Theology of the Body, meditating on Adam’s “sleep” from which the division of the sexes emerged.

9. Man Becomes the Image of God by Communion of Persons

In his General Audience of 14 November 1979, the Holy Father located the image of God, in which man was created, not only in the solitude of his humanity, but also in the communion of persons, in the creation of the first man and woman in relation to each other.

10. Marriage One and Indissoluble in First Chapters of Genesis

In his General Audience of 21 November 1979, the Holy Father spoke on the communion of the first man and woman, how it renewed their original unity before separation in creation, and revealed the meaning of their bodies by their complementarity.

11. Meaning of Original Human Experiences

In his General Audience of 12 December 1979, the Holy Father observed that, in the Genesis account, the shame at their nakedness, experienced by the first man and woman after the Fall, contrasts with their original innocence, which invites further study of their original consciousness of their bodies.

12. Fullness of Interpersonal Communication

In his General Audience of 19 December 1979, the Holy Father continued his series on the Theology of the Body, analyzing the absence of shame in our first parents, despite their nakedness, and its bearing on their communication.

13. Creation as a Fundamental and Original Gift

In his General Audience of 2 January 1980, the Holy Father continued his study of the Theology of the Body, analyzing the consciousness of our first parents, in how they perceived each other, without shame in their nakedness, as good, and a mutual gift, part of the good gift of God’s creation.

14. Revelation and Discovery of the Nuptial Meaning of the Body

In his General Audience of 9 January 1980, the Holy Father explained the “nuptial meaning” of the body as first experienced by Adam and Eve. Man, both male and female, realizes his essence only in living with and for someone else. The possibility of this mutual self-gift is manifested in the bodies of male and female, which gives them their nuptial meaning.

15. The Man-Person Becomes a Gift in the Freedom of Love

In his General Audience of 16 January 1980, the Holy Father continued his series on the Theology of the Body, by examining the “nuptial meaning of the body.” Through self-mastery, by which the purely physical side of sex was restrained, the first man and woman were free to give themselves totally to each other, and thereby discovered their true selves.

16. Mystery of Man’s Original Innocence

In his General Audience of 30 January 1980, the Holy Father pursued his examination of the Theology of the Body by dwelling on the mystery of man’s original innocence, that purity of heart which enabled Adam and Eve to give themselves to each other in love, as the effect of grace.

17. Man and Woman: A Mutual Gift for Each Other

In his General Audience of 6 February 1980, the Holy Father reexamined the nuptial meaning of the body, in the mutual gift of self by our first parents, in the context of their original innocence.

18. Original Innocence and Man’s Historical State
In his General Audience of 13 February 1980, the Holy Father reexamined our first parents’ original innocence, as their nature was originally graced, how it affected their relationship to each other and the nuptial meaning of their bodies as male and female.

19. Man Enters the World as a Subject of Truth and Love

In his General Audience of 20 February 1980, the Holy Father continued his series on the Theology of the Body. Created in the image of God, man (Adam and Eve) entered the world as a primordial sacrament, a sign to the visible world of the invisible mystery hidden in God, the mystery of truth and love, the mystery of divine life, in which man really participates.

20. Analysis of Knowledge and of Procreation

In his General Audience of 5 March 1980, the Holy Father continued his series on the Theology of the Body, by examining the meaning of the biblical statement that “Adam knew Eve his wife” (Gn 4:1-2).

21. Mystery of Woman Revealed in Motherhood

In his General Audience of 12 March 1980, the Holy Father further examined the concept of mutual “knowledge” between the first man and woman. The woman is brought to full awareness of the mystery of creation, in its renewal in human generation.

22. Knowledge-Generation Cycle and Perspective of Death

In his General Audience of 26 March 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body. He further examined biblical “knowledge,” as the nuptial relationship before the fall, a mutual, disinterested gift of self between spouses, contrasting it with the same relationship as a remedy for death after the fall.

23. Marriage in the Integral Vision of Man

In his General Audience of 2 April 1980, the Holy Father continued his series on Theology of the Body. Only by going back to the “beginning,” as Christ did in answering the Pharisees on divorce, can we get a total vision of man, male and female, and only so can we adequately understand marriage and procreation.

24. Christ Appeals to Man’s Heart

In his General Audience of 16 April 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body by turning to Christ’s teaching, in the Sermon on the Mount, on adultery in the heart.

25. Ethical and Anthropological Content of the Commandment: You Shall Not Commit Adultery

At his General Audience of 23 April 1980, the Holy Father continued his series on Theology of the Body. He examined the meaning of adultery, which is a breach in the unity of husband and wife, even if only by an interior act (“adultery in the heart”). He cited the case of David and Bathsheba.

26. Lust is the Fruit of the Breach of the Covenant With God

In his General Audience of 30 April 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body. He examined the three-fold lust, of the flesh, of the eyes, and the pride of life, by which man broke God’s original covenant.

27. Real Significance of Original Nakedness

In his General Audience of 14 May 1980, the Holy Father continued his series on Theology of the Body, explaining the nakedness of man after the fall as not merely physical. “…this man was deprived of the supernatural and preternatural gifts which were part of his endowment before sin. Furthermore, he suffered a loss in what belongs to his nature itself, to humanity in the original fullness of the image of God.”

28. A Fundamental Disquiet in All Human Existence

In his General Audience of 2 June 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body. The shame experienced by man after his fall expressed a deeper shame, called “cosmic,” reflecting a new disorder in his nature, by which not only was the relationship between man and woman affected, but the relationship between body and spirit.

29. Relationship of Lust to Communion of Persons

In his General Audience of 4 June 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body. He examined the radical transformation wrought by lust and shame in the original relationship between the first man and woman.

30. Dominion Over the Other in the Interpersonal Relation

In his General Audience of 18 June 1980, the Holy Father continued his series on Theology of the Body. Because of their sin, the man and woman feel shame toward each other, their communion is weakened, and he will exercise dominion over her.

31. Lust Limits Nuptial Meaning of the Body

In his General Audience of 25 June 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body. The sin of Adam and Eve distorted the “nuptial meaning of the body,” its masculinity/femininity, which was meant to shape their communion. Their relationship was corrupted by lust, which includes the desire to possess the other, rather than receive him/her as a free gift.

32. The Heart a Battlefield Between Love and Lust

In his General Audience of 23 July 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body. After the fall, human sexuality was marked by a certain “coercion of the body,” which subverts the expression of the spirit seeking the communion of persons, male and female, through a mutual gift of self. “The more lust dominates the heart, the less the heart experiences the nuptial meaning of the body.”

33. Opposition in the Human Heart between the Spirit and the Body

In his General Audience of 30 July 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body. The nuptial meaning of the body is destroyed when man or woman seeks to possess the other as an object, but not when each belongs to the other through self-giving.

34. Sermon on the Mount to the Men of Our Day

In his General Audience of 6 August 1980, the Holy Father, continuing his catechesis on Theology of the Body, examined the the “hardness of heart,” which all men share with Our Lord’s auditors, and its connection with the three-fold lust which is our heritage from Adam.

35. Content of the Commandment: You Shall Not Commit Adultery

In his General Audience of 13 August 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body. He presented Our Lord’s teaching against adultery “in the heart” as a return to the spirit of the law, whose letter had been stretched to allow polygamy.

36. Adultery According to the Law and as Spoken by the Prophets

In his General Audience of 20 August 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body. He examines the emphasis of the matrimonial law on the “procreative end of marriage,” and of the prophets on the uniqueness of the spousal relationship between God and Israel, contrary to the prevailing polygamy.

37. Adultery: A Breakdown of the Personal Covenant

In his General Audience of 27 August 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechetical cycle on Theology of the Body, on the subject of adultery. Adultery is a sin of the body, violating exclusive matrimonial rights between a man and a woman, which constitutes a breakdown of the personal covenant between them.

38. Meaning of Adultery Transferred from the Body to the Heart

In his General Audience of 3 September 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body, focusing on adultery, its place in the Wisdom tradition, and the change in emphasis introduced by Christ.

39. Concupiscence as a Separation From Matrimonial Significance of the Body

In his General Audience of 10 September 1980, the Holy Father continued his series on Theology of the Body. He gave a description of the inner effects of lust from the Wisdom tradition and then compared it with the teaching of Christ on “adultery in the heart.”

40. Mutual Attraction Differs from Lust

In his General Audience of 17 September 1980, the Holy Father continued his analysis of adultery in his series on Theology of the Body. The mutual attraction between a man and a woman, encompassing a “gamut of spiritual-corporal desires,” to which a “proportionate pyramid of values” corresponds, differs from lust, in that the latter reduces the pyramid to one level, sex, as an object of gratification.

41. Depersonalizing Effect of Concupiscence

In his General Audience of 24 September 1980, the Holy Father further examined “adultery in the heart,” spoken of by Our Lord in His Sermon on the Mount. When a woman is looked at lustfully by a man, she ceases to be regarded as a subject of personal attraction or communion, but only as an object of sexual satisfaction. And when this “intention” reaches the will, the man himself becomes enslaved.

42. Establishing the Ethical Sense

In his General Audience of 1 October 1980, the Holy Father continued his analysis of the words of Our Lord, in His Sermon on the Mount, concerning adultery in the heart. It is not merely a matter of lusting after a woman who is not one’s wife, but of looking at her in a way dismissive of her dignity as well as of one’s own.

43. Interpreting the Concept of Concupiscence

In his General Audience of 8 October 1980, the Holy Father concluded his analysis of adultery in the heart, by observing that it is an attitude of a man toward a woman (or vice versa) which reduces the communion of persons to satisfaction of an instinct. One may be guilty of this attitude towards one’s own spouse.

44. Gospel Values and Duties of the Human Heart

In his General Audience of 15 October 1980, the Holy Father continued his analysis of “adultery in the heart” by distinguishing condemnation of lust from a condemnation of the body.

45. Realization of the Value of the Body According to the Plan of the Creator

In his General Audience of 22 October 1980, the Holy Father clarified the meaning of lust, in his catechesis on Theology of the Body. Christ warned against lusting after a woman, not to condemn the body as evil (Manichaeism), but to condemn the devaluation of the body in its nuptial meaning, i.e., the manifestation of communion in spirit.

46. Power of Redeeming Completes Power of Creating

In his General Audience of 29 October 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on “adultery in the heart” by examining the three forms of lust (“of the flesh,” “of the eyes,” and the “pride of life”) spoken of by St. John (1 Jn 2:15-16), in relation to the skewed pictures of man presented by Freud, Marx and Nietzsche. The truth of his humanity, the ability to love, is deeper than the three lusts.

47. Eros and Ethos Meet and Bear Fruit in the Human Heart

In his General Audience of 5 November 2004, the Holy Father explained that the warning of Christ against looking lustfully at a woman is less an accusation than an appeal, that what the heart desires (eros) should also be what is right (ethos).

48. Spontaneity: The Mature Result of Conscience

In his General Audience of 12 November 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body by examining the notion that subjection of an erotic attraction to an ethical form deprives it of its spontaneity.

49. Christ Calls Us to Rediscover the Living Forms of the New Man

In his General Audience of 3 December 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body, with regard to adultery in the heart, by focusing on the ethos of redemption, which calls for temperance in the natural erotic attraction between a man and a woman.

50. Purity of Heart
In his General Audience of 10 December 1980, the Holy Father completed his study of adultery in the heart with a consideration of purity of heart, and how the Lord distinguished this from mere ritual purity.

51. Justification in Christ
In his General Audience of 17 December 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body by examining the conflict between “flesh” and “spirit” in the teaching of St. Paul. The lusts of the worldly man can be overcome by his spirit when empowered by the Holy Spirit.

52. Opposition Between the Flesh and the Spirit
In his General Audience of 7 January 1981, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body by examining St. Paul’s doctrine of justification, and in particular the opposition between life according to the flesh and life according to the Spirit (of God).

53. Life in the Spirit Based on True Freedom
In his General Audience of 14 January 1981, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body by further examination of St. Paul’s teaching on life according to the Spirit. It is purity of heart, which is the necessary condition for charity and true freedom.

54. St. Paul’s Teaching on the Sanctity and Respect of the Human Body
In his General Audience of 28 January 1981, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body by examining St. Paul’s teaching on purity, in 1 Thessalonians 4, that we should control our bodies in holiness and honor.

55. St. Paul’s Description of the Body and Teaching on Purity
In his General Audience of 4 February 1981, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body by examining St. Paul’s teaching on the body from 1 Corinthians 12. The human body is more than the sum of its biological characteristics. It is permeated by the “whole reality of the person and of his dignity.”

56. The Virtue of Purity Is the Expression and Fruit of Life According to the Spirit
In his General Audience of 11 February 1981, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body, by further examining St. Paul’s teaching on purity. It is identifiable as the virtue of temperance, but includes an element of respect for the body, as a temple of the Holy Spirit.

57. The Pauline Doctrine of Purity as Life According to the Spirit
In his General Audience of 18 March 1981, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body by further examination of St. Paul’s teaching on purity. This virtue is reinforced by piety, a gift of the indwelling Holy Spirit, by which God is glorified.

58. Positive Function of Purity of Heart
In his General Audience 1 April 1981, the Holy Father gathered the main threads of his teaching on Theology of the Body, as based on the words of Christ on man’s creation as male and female, and his warning against adultery in the heart. Lust can be displaced only by purity of heart, which, in the teaching of St. Paul, is a gift of the Holy Spirit.

59. Pronouncements of Magisterium Apply Christ’s Words Today
In his General Audience of 8 April 1981, the Holy Father concluded his reflections on the words of Christ, in the Sermon on the Mount, on adultery in the heart. These words are key to the Theology of the Body, which underlies the thinking of many recent magisterial pronouncements.

60. The Human Body, Subject of Works of Art
In his General Audience of 15 April 1981, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body, laying groundwork for a consideration of the human body in aesthetic experience, and how it relates to Our Lord’s warning against looking with lust.

61. Reflections on the Ethos of the Human Body in Works of Artistic Culture
In his General Audience of 22 April 1981, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body, examining the implications of exposure of the human body in artistic culture for the mutual donation of husband and wife.

62. Art Must Not Violate the Right to Privacy
In his General Audience of 29 April 1981, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body by examining the limits beyond which art must not go in depicting masculinity or femininity.

63. Ethical Responsibilities in Art
In his General Audience of 6 May 1981, the Holy Father concluded his reflections on the Sermon on the Mount, concerning adultery in the heart, with respect to artistic depictions of the human body.

64. Marriage and Celibacy in the Light of the Resurrection of the Body
In his General Audience of 11 November 1981, the Holy Father began a new segment of his catechesis on theology of the body, basing his talk on the words of Christ to the Sadducees on the general resurrection. “These words are of fundamental importance for understanding marriage in the Christian sense and also the renunciation of conjugal life for the kingdom of heaven.”

65. The Living God Continually Renews the Very Reality of Life
In his General Audience of 18 November 1981, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on theology of the body, by returning to the words of Christ to the Sadducees on the general resurrection. They deny the resurrection because they doubt the power of God.

66. The Resurrection and Theological Anthropology
In his General Audience of 2 December 1981, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body, by addressing the teaching of Christ on the relationship between male and female after the general resurrection.

67. The Resurrection Perfects the Person
In his General Audience of 9 December 1981, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body, with particular regard for the general resurrection, in which the body will be spiritualized, and both body and spirit divinized, in the vision of God.

68. Christ’s Words on the Resurrection Complete the Revelation of the Body
In his General Audience of 16 December 1981, the Holy Father continued his focus on Christ’s words about our condition after the general resurrection in his catechesis on theology of the body. Each person sharing in the beatific vision will have his own subjectivity perfected, and yet, in view of the Communion of the Trinity, experience a new depth of intersubjectivity which is the Communion of Saints. It will be virginal, and yet reveal the full nuptial meaning of the body, as a gift to God first, and through Him to others.

69. New Threshold of Complete Truth About Man
In his General Audience of 13 January 1982, the Holy Father continued his exposition of the words of Christ on the general resurrection, as applied to Theology of the Body. In some way difficult to imagine, the meaning of the human body will be revealed as the means of mutual self-giving in the communion of Saints.

70. Doctrine of the Resurrection according to St. Paul
In his General Audience of 27 January 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body by further examining St. Paul’s teaching, in 1 Corinthians 15, on the general resurrection. The resurrection of the body completes man’s redemption from the effects of sin.

71. The Risen Body Will Be Incorruptible, Glorious, Dynamic, and Spiritual
In his General Audience of 3 February 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body, by describing the body, at the general resurrection, as the fulfillment of the human aspiration to glory. This aspiration reflects the potentiality with which we were created to become conformed to the risen Christ.

72. Body’s Spiritualization Will Be Source of Its Power and Incorruptibility
In his General Audience of 10 February 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body by concluding his study of St. Paul’s teaching on the general resurrection. Resurrected man, no longer weakened through his resistance to the Spirit, will be fully vivified, attaining the fullness for which he was created.

73. Virginity or Celibacy for the Sake of the Kingdom
In his General Audience of 10 March 1982, the Holy Father began a new series on virginity/celibacy for the kingdom of heaven, in furtherance of his catechesis on theology of the body. A vocation to celibacy is an anticipation of that eschatological state when men “neither marry nor are given in marriage.”

74. The Vocation to Continence in This Earthly Life
In his General Audience of 17 March 1982, the Holy Father continued his talks on celibacy/virginity for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. This new ideal, though a departure from the Old Testament tradition of marriage, shed light on the theology of the body.

75. Continence for the Sake of the Kingdom Meant to Have Spiritual Fulfillment
In his General Audience of 24 March 1982, the Holy Father continued his talks on celibacy/virginity for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. It is a charismatic sign that in heaven people will no longer marry, because God will be everything to everyone. Departure from the Old Testament tradition of marriage and procreation was effected especially by the example of Christ himself.

76. The Effective and Privileged Way of Continence
In his General Audience of 31 March 1982, the Holy Father continued his talks on celibacy/virginity for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. Marriage is not depreciated, but continence has an exceptional value, when chosen with a supernatural motive.

77. Superiority of Continence Does Not Devalue Marriage
In his General Audience of 7 April 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on theology of the body, addressing the superiority of continence. It is superior to marriage, not based not on any devaluation of sexuality or of the human body, but on the motive for which continence is chosen, viz., the kingdom of heaven.

78. Marriage and Continence Complement Each Other
In his General Audience of 14 April 1982, the Holy Father continued his instruction on the relationship between marriage and continence. Those called to either state fulfill their calling in a spiritual paternity or maternity toward those in their care. And the nature of both is conjugal, being expressed in the total gift of oneself.

79. The Value of Continence Is Found in Love
In his General Audience of 21 April 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body, with regard to the choice of virginity or celibacy. Continence for the sake of the Kingdom of Heaven is the nuptial gift of self to Christ, the Spouse of the soul.

80. Celibacy Is a Particular Response to the Love of the Divine Spouse
In his General Audience of 28 April 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body by further explaining continence for the sake of the Kingdom of Heaven as the particular response of virginity/celibacy to the self-gift of the divine Spouse in the Paschal and Eucharistic Mystery.

81. Celibacy for the Kingdom Affirms Marriage
In his General Audience of 5 May 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body, by concluding his considerations on Christ’s words recommending continence for the sake of the Kingdom of Heaven. Renunciation of marriage for the sake of the Kingdom affirms the value of what is renounced, in the gift of self to God.

82. Voluntary Continence Derives From a Counsel, Not From a Command
In his General Audience of 23 June 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body, by addressing St. Paul’s treatment of virginity and marriage. Consecrated virginity is a matter of counsel, not command, so that marriage is no sin, though voluntary virginity is better.

83. The Unmarried Person Is Anxious to Please the Lord
In his General Audience of 30 June 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body, by examining St. Paul’s statement in 1 Corinthians 7, that one who marries does well, but one who chooses continence or virginity does better. Continence makes more room to be anxious for “the things of the Lord,” to please the Lord and work for the growth of His Church.

84. Everyone Has His Own Gift from God, Suited to His Vocation
In his General Audience of 7 July 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body, by further examination of St. Paul’s statement that it is better to choose continence than to marry. While the gift of continence allows an undivided love for God, the grace of marriage is a true gift, suited to that state in life.

85. The Kingdom of God, Not the World, Is Man’s Eternal Destiny
In his General Audience of 14 July 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body. He further examined St. Paul’s teaching on the complementarity of continence and marriage, both vocations having in view the future life.

86. Mystery of the Body’s Redemption Basis of Teaching on Marriage and Voluntary Continence
In his General Audience of 21 July 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body. The eschatological redemption of the body, in victory over death, is the inspiration for man’s victory over sin in daily life, whether in marriage or in celibacy.

87. Marital Love Reflects God’s Love for His People
In his General Audience of 28 July 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on theology of the body by laying the groundwork for an examination of St. Paul’s teaching on marriage in the fifth chapter of Ephesians. Marriage, as a sacrament, signifies the relationship between Christ and His Church, and before that, the spousal love between God and his chosen people.

88. The Call to Be Imitators of God and to Walk in Love
In his General Audience of 4 August 1982, the Holy Father continued his examination of the fifth chapter of Ephesians as part of his ongoing catechesis on theology of the body. The prescriptions for family relationships should be understood in light of the Apostle’s teaching on the Christian vocation.

89. Reverence for Christ the Basis of Relationship Between Spouses
In his General Audience of 11 August 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on theology of the body, by examining more closely the right relationship between husband and wife as described in the fifth chapter of the Letter to the Ephesians.

90. A Deeper Understanding of the Church and Marriage
In his General Audience of 18 August 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on theology of the body, looking more closely at the two-way analogy found in Ephesians 5, between the relationship of husband and wife and the relationship of Christ and His Church.

91. St Paul’s Analogy of the Union of Head and Body
In his General Audience of 25 August 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on theology of the body, by further examination of Ephesians 5. He focussed attention on the analogy of head and body, as analogous to both the Christ-Church relationship and the husband-wife relationship.

92. Sacredness of the Human Body and Marriage
In his General Audience of 1 September 1982, the Holy Father infers the sacredness of the human body from the analogy of love in Ephesians 5, between Christ for His Church and a husband for his wife.

93. Christ’s Redemptive Love Has Spousal Nature
In his General Audience of 8 September 1982, the Holy Father continued his exposition of the fifth chapter of Ephesians, focusing on the meaning of the word “mystery,” as it applies to God’s plan, its revelation in Christ, Christ’s relationship to the Church, and the sacraments of the Church.

94. Moral Aspects of the Christian’s Vocation
In his General Audience of 15 September 1982, the Holy Father continued his exposition of the fifth chapter of Ephesians, by showing how the mystery of God’s love, hidden for ages, was revealed in Jesus Christ, with an emphasis on his spousal donation of Himself to the Church and His members’ participation in the mystery.

95. Relationship of Christ to the Church Connected With the Tradition of the Prophets
In his General Audience of 22 September 1982, the Holy Father, in light of Ephesians 5, compared the relationship of Christ with His Church to the relationship, described by the Old Testament Prophets, of God with Israel. Whereas, in Isaiah, God is Israel’s spouse as her Maker, in Ephesians, Christ is the Church’s spouse as her Redeemer.

96. Analogy of Spousal Love Indicates the Radical Character of Grace
In his General Audience of 29 September 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on theology of the body by further examination of the spousal relationship between Christ and His Church in Ephesians 5. Of the various biblical analogies of the mystery of God’s love, the marriage analogy most emphasizes God’s gift of Himself to His people.

97. Marriage Is the Central Point of the Sacrament of Creation
In his General Audience of 6 October 1982, the Holy Father continued his exposition of fifth chapter of the Letter to the Ephesians, for the light it sheds on marriage as the “primordial” sacrament in the state of man’s original innocence.

98. Loss of Original Sacrament Restored with Redemption in Marriage-Sacrament
In his General Audience of 13 October 1982, Pope John Paul II continued his exposition of the fifth chapter of the Letter to the Ephesians, by relating Christ’s redemptive love to marriage as instituted in the beginning, when it was a sacrament of God’s gift of Himself to man and woman at their creation.

99. Marriage an Integral Part of New Sacramental Economy
In his General Audience of 20 October 1982, the Holy Father continued his commentary on Ephesians 5, to give further insights into his Theology of the Body. Marriage is so fundamental to the order of redemption established by Christ that “all the sacraments of the new covenant find their prototype in marriage as the primordial sacrament.”

100. Indissolubility of Sacrament of Marriage in Mystery of the Redemption of the Body
In his General Audience of 27 October 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on marriage in light of Ephesians 5. Man and woman becoming one flesh in marriage, as signifying the relationship between Christ and His Church, is a sign of the redemption of the body at the end of time.

101. Christ Opened Marriage to the Saving Action of God
In his General Audience of 24 November 1982, the Holy Father reexamined Ephesians 5 in light of the words of the Gospel, in which Christ, speaking to the Pharisees and in the Sermon on the Mount, confirmed marriage as a sacrament instituted by the Creator at the beginning. It is the sign of God’s original covenant, according to which man, both male and female, would be sanctified and adopted by God.

102. Marriage Sacrament an Effective Sign of God’s Saving Power
In his General Audience of 1 December 1982, the Holy Father drew together texts from the Gospel, Romans, and I Corinthians to shed further light on marriage as presented in Ephesians 5. This primordial sacrament prepares for the eschatological hope of the general resurrection in procreating sons and daughters who are to participate in the resurrection, and thus experience the redemption of the body.

103. The Redemptive and Spousal Dimensions of Love
In his general audience of 15 December 1982, the Holy Father continued his commentary on Ephesians 5, for further insights into marriage and the Theology of the Body. The original structure of marriage, as a sacrament of creation, “is renewed in the mystery of the redemption, when that mystery assumes the aspect of the spousal love of the Church on the part of Christ.”

104. The Substratum and Content of the Sacramental Sign of Spousal Communion
In his General Audience of 5 January 1983, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body by analyzing the sign (form) of the sacrament of marriage into two aspects: the expression of the will to be united (the wedding vows), and the actual union when the marriage is consummated.

105. The Language of the Body in the Structure of Marriage
In his General Audience of 12 January 1983, the Holy Father analyzed the sacramentality of marriage under the aspect of a sign. The sign is expressed in the language of the body, in its masculinity or femininity, as a personal gift to its spouse.

106. The Sacramental Covenant in the Dimension of Sign
In his General Audience of 19 January 1983, the Holy Father explains that the sign of the Sacrament of Marriage is constituted by the words of matrimonial consent, “because the spousal significance of the body in its masculinity and femininity is found expressed in them.” In giving their consent, the spouses confirm their participation in the “prophetic mission of the Church received from Christ.”

107. Language of the Body Strengthens the Marriage Covenant
In his General Audience of 26 January 1983, the Holy Father continued his analysis of the “language of the body” as expressed in the marriage covenant between spouses. They “reread” the language of the body in their living together as a communion of persons.

108. Man Called to Overcome Concupiscence
In his General Audience of 9 February 1983, the Holy Father continued his analysis of the “language of the body,” expressed in the marriage covenant, but now with consideration of its misreading in the man of concupiscence. He/she is called by Christ to return from sin to chastity in rereading the truth of the body in the mystery of redemption.

109. Return to the Subject of Human Love in the Divine Plan
In his General Audience of 23 May 1984, the Holy Father (after a hiatus devoted to reflections on the Holy Year) resumed his treatment of the topic of human love in the divine plan. He began an analysis of the Song of Songs, situating it within the tradition of marital love reaching back to Genesis. It is the sign of the covenant made by God with man in the beginning.

110. Truth and Freedom the Foundation of True Love
In his General Audience of 30 May 1984, the Holy Father continued his analysis of the Song of Songs for further examination of the sacramental sign of marriage. It is expressed in the “language of the body,” which begins in the heart. It reflects the familiarity of friendship, but also the mystery of a woman’s interior inviolability, which is freely given to the man.

111. Love Is Ever Seeking and Never Satisfied
In his General Audience of 6 June 1984, the Holy Father continued his analysis of the Song of Songs in connection with his catechesis on Theology of the Body. On the basis of a love which is both spiritual and sensual, the significance of the body is reread, and their union becomes the sign of the mutual gift of self.

112. Love Is Victorious in the Struggle Between Good and Evil
In his General Audience of 27 June 1984, the Holy Father examined the Book of Tobit for the light it sheds on Theology of the Body. Here the devotion of the spouses is expressed not in words of loving transport, as in the Song of Songs, but in the “choices and the actions that take on all the weight of human existence in the union of the two.”

113. The Language of the Body: Actions and Duties Forming the Spirituality of Marriage
In his General Audience of 4 July 1984, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body. He returned to the fifth chapter of Ephesians to examine how the “language of the body” is elevated by the language of liturgy to a “great mystery,” the Sacrament of Matrimony.

114. Morality of Marriage Act Determined by Nature of the Act and of the Subjects
In his General Audience of 11 July 1984, the Holy Father turned to reflections on Paul VI’s Humanae Vitae as an application of his catechesis on the theology of human love in God’s plan. He spoke on the inseparable connection “between the unitive significance and the procreative significance which are both inherent to the marriage act.”

115. The Norm of Humanae Vitae Arises from the Natural Law and the Revealed Order
In his General Audience of 18 July 1984, the Holy Father continued his exposition of the Encyclical, Humanae Vitae, observing that its moral norm–marital openness to procreation–not only accords with natural law (reason) and the revealed moral law, but finds support in the Theology of the Body.

116. Importance of Harmonizing Human Love with Respect for Life
In his General Audience of 25 July 1984, the Holy Father continued his reflections, linking Humanae Vitae with the theology of human love in God’s plan. The Theology of the Body, offering confirmation of the moral norm in the Encyclical, prepares us to consider more deeply, from a pastoral perspective, the difficulty of complying with the norm.

117. Responsible Parenthood
In his general audience of 1 August 1984, the Holy Father continued his analysis of Humanae Vitae in light of Gaudium et Spes, underlining the principle that, while responsible parenthood follows the dictates of conscience, conscience must conform to the “objective moral order instituted by God.”

118. Faithfulness to the Divine Plan in the Transmission of Life
In his general audience of 8 August 1984, the Holy Father continued his analysis of Humanae Vitae, in comparing natural regulation of fertility with contraception. There is an essential difference between the two, the former following the lead of nature, the latter obstructing it.

119. Church’s Position on Transmission of Life
At his General Audience of 22 August 1984, the Holy Father continued his reflections on Humanae Vitae, by focussing on the “essence of the Church’s doctrine on the transmission of life.” The language of the body, in order to be true, as conforming to the moral order, should signify not only the unitive aspect, but the procreative aspect, of marriage.

120. A Discipline That Ennobles Human Love
In his General Audience of 28 August 1984, the Holy Father continued his reflections on Humanae Vitae, turning his attention to natural regulation of fertility, which is consistent with responsible parenthood, though artificial contraception is not.

121. Responsible Parenthood Linked to Moral Maturity
In his general audience of 5 September 1984, the Holy Father continued his exposition of the Church’s teaching on natural regulation of fertility, in light of Humanae Vitae and Familiaris Consortio. It is the ethical dimension, in the virtue of temperance, that prevents this method from becoming just another form of contraception.

122. Prayer, Penance and the Eucharist: Principal Sources of Spirituality for Married Couples
In his General Audience of 3 October 1984, the Holy Father continued his exposition of Humanae Vitae, showing the relationship between the “honest practice of fertility regulation” and the “Christian spirituality of the conjugal vocation and life.”

123. The Power of Love Is Given to Man and Woman as a Share in God’s Love
In his General Audience of 10 October 1984, the Holy Father continued his exposition of Humanae Vitae, as it bore on his Theology of the Body. The love that God gives to husband and wife is a supernatural power enabling them to coordinate their actions toward the good of marriage, a communion of persons, while safeguarding the connection between the “two meanings of the conjugal act,” the unitive and the procreative.

124. Continence Protects the Dignity of the Conjugal Act
In his General Audience of 24 October 1984, the Holy Father gave close examination to the virtue of continence, in light of the teaching of Humanae Vitae. Continence in marriage not only resists concupiscence, but enlarges the capacity of husband and wife to love each other.

125. Continence Frees One from Inner Tension
In his General Audience of 31 October 1984, the Holy Father continued his treatment of the virtue of continence in light of the teaching of Humanae Vitae. He distinguished between excitement, which tends toward the conjugal act, and emotion which is an affectionate response to the masculinity or femininity of the marital partner. Continence gives direction to both.

126. Continence Deepens Personal Communion
At the General Audience on 7 November 1984, Pope John Paul II continued his analysis of the virtue of continence in light of Humanae Vitae. The virtue of continence has “not only the capacity to contain bodily and sensual reactions, but even more the capacity to control and guide man’s whole sensual and emotive sphere.”

127. Christian Spirituality of Marriage by Living According to the Spirit
In his General Audience of 14 November 1984, the Holy Father continued his exposition of Humanae Vitae for the light it sheds on the role of chastity in married life. The virtue of chastity not only regulates manifestations of affection, but opens the couple to the gifts of the Holy Spirit, by which they are enabled to achieve a communion of persons.

128. Respect for the Work of God
In his General Audience of 21 November 1984, the Holy Father traced an outline of conjugal spirituality, based on the teaching of Humanae Vitae. He explained the gift of piety, respect for the work of God, with particular reference to the significance of the conjugal act, “its dignity and the consequent serious responsibility connected with it.”

129. Conclusion to the Series: Redemption of the Body and Sacramentality of Marriage
In his General Audience of 28 November 1984, the Holy Father concluded his four-year catechesis on Theology of the Body with a summary of his conclusions. His catechesis was divided into two parts: the first was a study of Christ’s words on marriage and their implications for the redemption of the body, and the second, an analysis of the sacramentality of marriage as presented in Ephesians 5, with added insights from Humanae Vitae.

Less Religion, More Evangelism! thumbnail

Less Religion, More Evangelism!

By Family Research Council

new study indicates that Americans are becoming less religious. Without getting into the causes of this phenomenon or critiquing the study itself, let’s simply accept that we are living in an era in which Christianity is an increasingly less robust force in the lives of millions of our fellow countrymen.

So, now what? Evangelicals would be gravely mistaken to wring their hands and mourn for the good old days. Secularism is upon us, and with it, not only apathy toward Christianity but, among some, overt hostility to it. How are we going to respond?

At least some of the answers are as old as the Book of Acts. The Roman world was, in some important ways, quite like ours. Power, pleasure, and plenty were as much or more the gods of that ancient age as the statues representing Greco-Roman deities. Sexual profligacy was an accepted norm. Entertainment, often horrifyingly violent, was culturally pervasive. The elites saw themselves as the chosen few to whom the common people owed servility.

It was into this culture that the good news of God becoming man in the person of a Jewish laborer from a small province along the eastern Mediterranean coast transformed first a handful of His followers and then took root throughout the Empire like seed on fertile soil. The New Testament mentions 33 distinct churches, which no doubt is an incomplete list.

What did the early Christians do that enabled them to advance the truth of a crucified and risen Savior so persuasively? What follows is not a comprehensive list, but points to some truths worth considering.

First, they talked about it. The whole body of New Testament literature speaks to the fact that the early believers told others about Jesus. This was not always easy; Paul’s statement, “I am not ashamed of the gospel” (Romans 1:16) indicates that evangelism had its challenges. But nonetheless, by the end of the first century, the gospel went forward not only in the Roman Empire but as far south as what is now Ethiopia and as far east as India.

We should be like those first Christ-followers. Gracious but purposeful conversations about Who Christ is and what He has done should be our stock-in-trade. There is so much material on evangelism available freely on the web, in bookstores and churches, in Bible studies and fellowship groups, that all who understand the necessity of sharing their faith can learn to do this well. And: while practice may not mean perfect, it can sure bolster one’s confidence and hone his or her presentation.

Second, the early Christians recognized that while they were in the culture of their time, they were not of it. For generations, being a Christian in America has not been unpleasant. While some derision comes with even tepid faith in Jesus, Evangelicals could exist within the mainstream of our society with only the occasional ripple of discomfort.

No longer. The refusal of the early Christians to offer a sacrifice to the Emperor resulted in the allegiance to Jesus being a capital crime. We’re not there yet, but when even someone as temperate as the late Tim Keller is denied recognition by Princeton Seminary — once the bastion of Reformed faith in America — because of his orthodox stance on human sexuality, we know times have changed.

American Evangelicals need to come to grips with the fact that the gospel is offensive (Galatians 5:11). We tell people they are sinners, that they face eternal judgment unless they repent and believe in Christ alone, and that practices God’s Word says are evil cannot be rationalized as acceptable. So, between the inherent offense of the cross and the antagonism of our culture, we have to decide that this world is not our home.

Third, it is absolutely imperative that our churches teach our youth (a) the essentials of Christian faith, (b) why these essentials are vital, and (c) that following them faithfully leads to a flourishing life.

Sound doctrine is the heart of Christianity. It’s not a matter of the rote memorization of some arcane Bible facts, but the internalization of living truth that alters our perspectives, priorities, and understanding of all that is right and good. For example, when we talk about Jesus’ death on the cross and use terms like “atonement” and “propitiation,” we’re not employing theological terms to impress and humiliate. Understood correctly, words like these brighten our minds and deepen our hearts and souls because they help us know God better.

Anyone can learn basic theology, not to foster intellectual pride but to represent God and His Word well. A good study Bible is a great place to start.

A less religious America is a field ripe for spiritual harvest. Let’s get to work.

AUTHOR

Rob Schwarzwalder

Rob Schwarzwalder is Senior Lecturer in Regent University’s Honors College.

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. ©2023 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

NO to Gelman as U.S. Ambassador to Israel thumbnail

NO to Gelman as U.S. Ambassador to Israel

By Barry Shaw

Our antennas are hot wired into identifying who is good for us and who is against us. Gelman is not in the good for us category.


Susie Gelman is absolutely the wrong candidate for US Ambassador to Israel.

Ambassador to the Palestinian Authority maybe, but not to Israel.

In her role as chair of the Israel Policy Forum (someone will have to explain to me how she ever got that position) Gelman professed to love Israel as she works tirelessly against the best interests of Israel.

Israel Policy Forum, like JStreet, attempts to impose left-wing radical policies on Israel.
Susie Gelman embodies their unacceptable ideas.

She has worked to undermine the current Bibi government which she views as “extremist.”

Gelman has called Israel’s Independence Day as “Nakba Day.”

How can someone who wrote in 2018 that the opening of the US Embassy in Jerusalem was “the highest level of brazen partisanship in U.S.-Israel relations since Prime Minister Netanyahu’s speech to a joint session of Congress in 2015 in which he expressed his opposition to the Iran nuclear deal,” even agree to accept the position sit in that embassy as the US Ambassador to Israel?

That would be the height of personal and political hypocrisy by Susie Gelman.

It would also indicate to Israel that we have an American enemy sitting in our capital.

In her role as Ambassador to Israel she is likely to implement the Biden administration’s intention to “provide 5,000 Palestinians with commando training in Jordan and then deploy them to northern Samaria, and perhaps the South Hebron Hills.”

I live in Netanya very close to the Mediterranean Sea and I look at those South Hebron Hills from my living room and from my study, the place where I wrote this report. If I can see them, American trained Palestinian gunmen can see me and my hometown.

Netanya is a town that has a tragic history of foolish American policies imposed on Israel and, as one of the founders of the Netanya Terror Victims organization, I say never again.

Our antennas are hot wired into identifying who is good for us and who is against us, and Gelman does not fit into the good for us category.

Wealthy Gelman and her husband have established a foundation that funds anti-Israel leftist causes. Her money has gotten her positions of influence and power within the Democrat party hierarchy.

As David Greenfield, researcher, and respected journalist, summarized, Gelman, sitting in her role in Jerusalem, would be in a position to wage diplomatic war against Israel.

If Biden or Blinken nominate Gelman to this role it will be perceived as a provocative act against the elected government of Israel.

Susie Gelman is absolutely the wrong candidate to be the next US Ambassador to Israel.

©2023. Barry Shaw. All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Biden’s Antisemitism Strategy Fails to Condemn BDS, Includes Hamas-Linked CAIR

Israel: Knife-wielding Palestinian jihad terrorist storms synagogue, is shot by Israeli security guards

Detroit: Imam warns against allying with ‘people who endorse LGBTQ principles’ says Democrats are ‘at war with Allah’ thumbnail

Detroit: Imam warns against allying with ‘people who endorse LGBTQ principles’ says Democrats are ‘at war with Allah’

By Jihad Watch

A hadith depicts Muhammad specifying the punishment for homosexual activity: “The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said, ‘Whoever you find doing the action of the people of Loot, execute the one who does it and the one to whom it is done.’” (Sunan Abu Dawud 4462)

Detroit Imam Imran Salha Warns Muslims: In Supporting Palestine, Do Not Ally With Supporters Of LGBTQ Rights, Democratic Party, Who Are ‘At War With Allah’; Adds: May Allah Eradicate Sick, Disgusting Zionist Regime

MEMRI, May 19, 2023:

In a Friday, May 19, 2023 sermon at the Islamic Center of Detroit, Michigan, Imam Imran Salha warned Muslims against forging alliances with pro-Palestine activists who endorse LGBTQ principles and who are “at war with Allah”, such as the Democratic Party. Salha also condemned Israel’s Jerusalem Day Flag March, in which the “sick disgusting Zionist regime – may Allah eradicate them,” took their “disgusting flags [and] entered the purified land of Al-Aqsa.” He warned the Islamic leaders and scholars “who have sold out on Palestine,” saying: “You will be dragged by the chains of Hellfire with the people that you want to make peace with.” Imam Salha was born in New Jersey and is of Palestinian origin. The sermon was posted on the YouTube channel of ICD – the Islamic Center of Detroit.

Imran Salha: “If somebody loves Palestine, but they don’t worship Allah, then I don’t want your activism for Palestine. What is your activism for Palestine going to help me, if you are at war with Allah? This is one of the mistakes that, unfortunately, here in America, we have made politically. We want to work for the sake of Palestine, but then shake hands with people who endorse things like the LGBTQ principles.

“So you will say that the Democrats will support the Palestinians, but they are at war with Allah. Do you think that someone who is at war with Allah will help you achieve freedom for Palestine?

[…]

“You know Paradise, you know Hell, you know the Day of Judgement, you know the Purgatory. You know that if you are patient, you have something to look forward to, whereas those [non-believers], the only thing they know about death is that they will become fertilizer for cows.

[…]

“There was the Flag March in Palestine, where the sick, disgusting Zionist regime – may Allah eradicate them from existence, say: ‘Amen’ – they took their disgusting flags, the flags of occupation and oppression, and entered into the purified land of Al-Aqsa, walking around as if they had a claim to that land.

[…]

“The most confused youth are the white-washed youth. You are not white. You are not European. You are an Arab. And you are… Be as [Arab] as they see you can possibly be.

[…]

“Do not try to appease the White Man. We have been stuck under the colonized way of thinking.

[…]

“Those who don’t want us to succeed, want us to erase [our identity], and all come to America, in the melting pot, and listen to Justin Bieber. No. We don’t need this, and we reject that. We have our culture and we have our things that we return to.

[…]

“And we say, inshallah, to those who have sold out on Palestine, whether they are a sheikh, a leader, or call themselves an [Islamic] scholar – you are a sell-out, nothing but a sell-out, you are a dishonorable human being, and there is a problem with your faith, and you will be inshallah dragged by the chains of Hellfire, with the people you want to make peace with.

[…]

“May Allah grant us, in our lifetime, the ability to see a free Muslim nation, liberated from the shackles of colonization, Allah willing.”

AUTHOR

ROBERT SPENCER

RELATED VIDEO: Hatun Tash and Robert Spencer on Christians in the Ottoman Empire

RELATED ARTICLES:

Colonel Richard Kemp on the IDF’s Achievements

Burkina Faso: Muslims murder around 20 civilians in two jihad massacres, torch homes and stores

Fatah celebrates murder of 80-year-old woman, treats all of Israel as ‘occupied’

NC Nakba Day rallygoers endorse jihad attacks against Israel, claim ‘Palestinians’ are allies of homosexuals

Germany: Migrants stab anti-mass migration politician and critically injure him

Colonel Richard Kemp on the IDF’s Achievements

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.