Interesting . . . Trump margin of “defeat” in 4 states occurred in 4 data dumps between 1:34-6:31 AM. Statistical anomaly? Fraud? Look at the evidence and decide for yourself.(That is, if Big Tech allows u to read this)
Sen. Rand Paul questions statistical ‘fraud’ in states Trump lost: ‘4 data dumps between 1:34-6:31 AM’
U.S. Senator Rand Paul called out late-night voting “data dumps” as he questioned potential “fraud” in several states where President Donald Trump lost the election.
By: Frieda Powers | Business Insider | November 30, 2020
The Kentucky Republican tweeted Sunday questioning the “statistical anomaly” that occurred in the states, linking to an article on the issue and the “vote spikes” favoring Democrat Joe Biden that occurred in the early hours of Nov. 4. Paul included an additional jab in his tweet at Big Tech for potentially censoring the material.
“Interesting . . . Trump margin of ‘defeat’ in 4 states occurred in 4 data dumps between 1:34-6:31 AM,” the Republican lawmaker tweeted.
“Statistical anomaly? Fraud? Look at the evidence and decide for yourself. (That is, if Big Tech allows u to read this),” Paul wrote, linking to the piece titled, “Anomalies in Vote Counts and Their Effects on Election 2020.”
Interesting . . . Trump margin of “defeat” in 4 states occurred in 4 data dumps between 1:34-6:31 AM. Statistical anomaly? Fraud? Look at the evidence and decide for yourself.(That is, if Big Tech allows u to read this)
The blog post cited by the senator looked at the “vote spikes” for Biden in the states of Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia as well as “statistically anomalous cases” in other states.
Paul’s tweet was quickly flagged by Twitter for containing disputed information, and the senator was predictably slammed on the platform.
This is dangerous and irresponsible. There is no evidence of fraud. The senator is spreading lies and misinformation to cast doubt over a clear and fair and honest win by Joe Biden. https://t.co/94E8WPPhOC
According to the article Paul linked to, Biden received several “vote spikes” in the middle of the night and early morning of the election “that substantially — and decisively — improved his electoral position” in the key states that Trump ultimately lost.
“Our analysis finds that a few key vote updates in competitive states were unusually large in size and had an unusually high Biden-to-Trump ratio. We demonstrate the results differ enough from expected results to be cause for concern,” the report stated.
The analysis explained that it only used “publicly available data from the New York Times to identify and analyze statistical anomalies in key states,” noting that the four instances that stood out “were particularly anomalous and influential with respect to this property and all occurred within the same five hour window.”
The three states where the anomalies supposedly occurred — Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia — collectively represent 42 electoral votes. The report concluded that the results “combined with staggering political implications, demands immediate and thorough investigation.”
Steve Cortes, the Senior Advisor for Strategy for the Trump 2020 campaign, presented a video “chalk talk” on “historical and statistical” election anomalies. Presenting several examples of the questionable results in state and county numbers, Cortes noted how it could be possible for Biden to have won on some localities but not “probable.”
https://libertyfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/logo_v6_225x110.png00Pamela Gellerhttps://libertyfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/logo_v6_225x110.pngPamela Geller2020-12-01 08:16:352020-12-01 08:16:35Sen. Rand Paul: Trump margin of ‘defeat’ in 4 states occurred in 4 data dumps between 1:34-6:31 AM
The resolution states that the executive and judicial branches of the Keystone State’s government usurped the legislature’s constitutional power to set the rules of the election.
Pennsylvania Lawmakers Formally Introduce Resolution to Dispute 2020 Elections
By Ivan Pentchoukov, The Epcoh Tinmes, November 30, 2020: Republican state lawmakers in Pennsylvania on Monday introduced a resolution to dispute the results of the 2020 election. The text of the resolution, first previewed in a memo on Nov. 27, states that the executive and judicial branches of the Keystone State’s government usurped the legislature’s constitutional power to set the rules of the election.
“Officials in the Executive and Judicial Branches of the Commonwealth infringed upon the General Assembly’s authority under the Constitution of the United States by unlawfully changing the rules governing the November 3, 2020, election in the Commonwealth,” the resolution (pdf) states.
The resolution calls on the secretary of the Commonwealth to withdraw the “premature certification” of the presidential election and delay certifying other races, declares the 2020 election to be in dispute, and urges the U.S. Congress “to declare the selection of presidential electors in this Commonwealth to be in dispute.”
Members of the Pennsylvania General Assembly said in a statement, “A number of compromises of Pennsylvania’s election laws took place during the 2020 General Election. The documented irregularities and improprieties associated with mail-in balloting, pre-canvassing, and canvassing have undermined our elector process and, as a result, we cannot accept certification of the results in statewide races.”
They added, “We believe this moment is pivotal and important enough that the General Assembly needs to take extraordinary measures to answer these extraordinary questions. We also believe our representative oversight duty as Pennsylvania’s legislative branch of government demands us to re-assume our constitutional authority and take immediate action.”
The proposed text lists three steps taken by the judicial and executive branches to change the rules of the election.
First, on Sept. 17, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court “unlawfully and unilaterally” extended the deadline by which mail ballots could be received, mandated that ballots without a postmark would be treated as timely, and allowed for ballots without a verified voter signature to be accepted, the resolution says.
Second, on Oct. 23, upon a petition from the secretary of the commonwealth, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that signatures on mail-in ballots need not be authenticated.
And third, on Nov. 2, the secretary of the commonwealth “encouraged certain counties to notify party and candidate representatives of mail-in voters whose ballots contained defects,” the resolution says. All of the changes are contrary to the Pennsylvania Election Code, which requires mail-in ballots to be received at 8 p.m. on Election Day, mandates that signatures on the mail-in ballots be authenticated, and forbids the counting of defective mail-in ballots.
“But it was so long ago when she said that. Eighteen years! Can’t people change?” Yes, we’ll get to that excuse a bit later on. “Reema Dodin to be first Palestinian-American White House staffer,” by Tzvi Joffre, Jerusalem Post, November 25, 2020:
Reema Dodin is a Palestinian-American who will serve alongside Shuwanza Goff as a deputy director of the White House Office of Legislative Affairs, President-elect Joe Biden announced on November 23.
Dodin will be the first Palestinian-American to serve as a White House staffer, according to Palestinian media.
The new White House staffer was born to Jordanian-Palestinian immigrants in the US. Dodin’s family is originally from Dura, near Hebron, according to Palestinian media.
Why is Dodin not a “Jordanian-American,” or more accurately still, simply an “American”? It’s because the “Palestinian” refugee identity has uniquely been treated as something that can be handed down from generation to generation. Henry Kissinger is a German Jewish refugee. His son, born in America, is not. Vladimir Nabokov was a Russian refugee; his son Dmitri, born in Berlin, was not. But the grandchildren, the great-grandchildren, and so on, apparently forever, of “Palestinian refugees” – born and raised all over the world – continue to be considered “Palestinian refugees,” and remain, most beneficially for themselves, on UNRWA’s rolls. Of the tens of millions of refugees since World War II, only one group – the “Palestinians” – have this amazing ability to inherit from their parents and grandparents the status of “Palestinian refugees.” Only 30,000 real refugees – those who left Mandatory Palestine/Israel between 1947 and 1949 – are still alive. But according to the U.N., once you count up all the descendants of those who left Mandatory Palestine/Israel, there are five million “Palestinian refugees.” Indeed, Reema Dodin herself could right now be on those rolls and receive aid from UNRWA, for she, too, counts as a “Palestinian refugee,” despite her parents being Jordanian citizens and she herself being born in the U.S.
Dodin served as deputy chief of staff to Democratic Senator Richard Durbin and has also served on the Judiciary Subcommittee on Human Rights and the Law, among other positions. She is a graduate of the University of California at Berkeley and the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. She is also a Truman National Security Fellow, a New Leaders Council Fellow, an Aspen Socrates alum, a former term member of the Council on Foreign Relations, and a member of the Jenkins Hill Society – a consortium of women in politics supporting female politicians.”
A careerist, forsooth, a winner of fellowships in an age of hypertrophied insistence upon “diversity and inclusiveness,” and a joiner, who knows just what to join, someone who unobtrusively climbs, step after step, the ladder of political success. A cheerful, smiling, industrious and eye-on-the-main-chance Palestinian-American Sammy Glick. So ask yourself: what makes Reema run?
During the Second Intifada, in 2002, Dodin spoke about the Palestinian-Israeli conflict with residents of Lodi, California, saying that “suicide bombers were the last resort of a desperate people,” according to the Lodi News-Sentinel. In 2001, Dodin took part in a demonstration at UC Berkeley calling for the university to divest from Israel, according to the Berkeley Daily Planet, a local news publication. The demonstrators compared Israel to apartheid South Africa….
What shall we say about this appalling choice? Yes, I know, she’s not being made Secretary of State or National Security Adviser, but as one of two deputy directors of the White House Office of Legislative Affairs, she will be in a position to keep track of proposed or impending or about-to-be-voted on legislation about Israel, Palestinian Authority, Hamas, Iran, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, the whole Middle Eastern works. She will know which Congressmen are “on our [Palestinian] side,” who can be persuaded to move toward the Palestinian position, who supports Israel and cannot be moved; she’s in the perfect place to inform or warn her allies in the pro-Palestinian camp of what’s to come, and how best to promote or stop it. She’ll know what’s going on in each office in Congress: who’s in, who’s out, and where are the snows of yesteryear. Halie Soifer, a former Hill aide who now serves as executive director of the National Jewish Democratic Council, referred to Dodin as “a fixture of the Senate, who knows what’s happening in the Senate before most senators do.” Think about that last remark for a minute.
For several years, she worked as the Deputy Chief of Staff for Senator Dick Durbin, who tweeted his pleasure over the appointment: “Excited that my Floor Director, Reema Dodin, will be joining President-elect Biden’s Leg Affairs team. She is smart, trusted, & has the respect of members on both sides of the aisle. Reema is just what our new President needs to help him in the Senate. Thrilled with the appointment.”
Durbin used to be a strong supporter of Israel. But in the last few years, he has become noticeably less so. He did not vote to condemn UNSC Resolution 2334, a grotesque anti-Israel resolution adopted by the Security Council’s kangaroo court on Dec. 23, 2019, after Samantha Power did as instructed from Washington, and abstained, rather than veto the bill. A parting fillip to Israel by Barack Obama. Durbin even held up a Senate resolution to condemn UNSC Resolution 2334, as was revealed by his fellow Democrat, Senator Tom Udall of New Mexico. Durbin voted “Nay” on the Strengthening America’s Security in the Middle East Act of 2019, which had mainly to do with military aid to Israel. He was one of only 23 Senators to do so, with almost all the pro-Israel Senators voting for the bill. Durbin now believes the “settlements are illegal.” He has never mentioned, and appears unaware of, the significance of the Mandate for Palestine and the territories assigned by the League of Nations to the future Jewish National Home, which include all of Judea and Samaria (a/k/a the “West Bank”). Nor does he appear to understand what U.N. Resolution 242 was all about – as explained by its author, British Ambassador to the U.N. Lord Caradon – which was to ensure that Israel could retain territories won in the “recent conflict” (the Six-Day War) that it needed if it was to have, in that Resolution’s key phrase, “secure [i.e. defensible] and recognized boundaries.”
I suspect Senator Durbin has been greatly influenced by in recent years by his Deputy Chief of Staff, the “Jordanian-Palestinian” or “Palestinian-American” Ms. Reema Dodin, articulate, well-organized, a master of parliamentary procedure, a pleasure to work with, who has provided Senator Durbin with a different “perspective” on the Arab-Israeli dispute. Now he has been told, I have a feeling, from Ms. Dodin, of the “terrible plight” of the “Palestinian people,” knows that there are things he can learn from the personal testimony she is ready to provide – goodness, what luck to have someone who can testify, almost at first-hand, about what the “Palestinian people” have endured. Reema Dodin is pleased to set him straight. To wit, I would guess, she’s explained that “settlements are illegal” as “the U.N. has said so many times,” that “if there is ever to be a genuine peace,” then Israel must go back to something close to the 1949 armistice lines, back to that nine-mile-wide waist from Qalqilya to the sea, that the “Palestinian people” have suffered terribly; that the only way that peace will come is if there are “two states, living side by side in peace,” and it’s long past time that Israel accepted “the outstretched hand of peace that the Palestinians have been offering for so long.” Just imagine over how many weeks, months, years of working so diligently for him, how many occasions there must have been for her to provide a stealthy stillicide of misrepresentation and misinformation. Reema Dodin has managed as a real “Palestinian” to serve as his native informant, all the while gently, carefully, first a little thence to more, providing her impressionable boss with the Palestinian Received Version of the Arab-Israel. dispute. “Well done, thou good and faithful servant” someone in Ramallah must be saying on hearing the news of her appointment, and as for CAIR, how could it not be delighted?
Given her intolerable remark, her appointment raises questions.
Did Biden not know when he appointed Reema D., that she had once offered an appeal for “understanding” suicide bombers – almost justifying them as driven to such acts because there was simply no other way for them to express their despair: “suicide bombers are the last resort of a desperate people”? Or did he not know, which raises questions about the transition team’s vetting of candidates? Think about that. Suicide bombers are the last resort of a “desperate people.” There are hundreds of millions of desperate people in this world, and they do not resort to “suicide bombings.” Think of the Christians persecuted in many Muslim lands: Pakistan, Egypt, Iran, Nigeria.. Have any of them ever resorted to “suicide bombings”? When Jewish refugees were desperate to get to Mandatory Palestine, before, during, and after World War II, but were prevented from doing so by the British – in direct violation of Great Britain’s duty as Mandatory to “facilitate” Jewish immigration — did any those tragic Jewish refugees turned back ever become “suicide bombers”? Did Zionists in England, driven half-mad by the British refusal to rescue their coreligionists by letting them into Palestine, ever engage in the “suicide bombing” of crowds in Selfridges or Oxford Street or the Burlington Arcade or the Victoria-and-Albert Hall? Do the truly desperate people, far more wretched and desperate than the Palestinians – in Bolivia or Haiti or the Congo or Nepal, blow themselves up in a crowd of visiting NGO dignitaries because they needed to be heard, and that was only way they could get the indifferent world’s attention, with this “last resort of a desperate people”?
Of course, the Palestinians are not exactly “desperate” in the sense of not being attended to. Their cause is a regular item on the U.N.’s docket; it’s discussed, as Agenda Item #7, at every session of the UNHRC (U.N. Human Rights Council). The Palestinians are the object of more sympathetic attention than any other group in the world; they are not “desperate” for attention. Palestinian suicide bombers don’t need to attract the world’s attention — they already have that — they simply want to kill as many Jews as they can.
Let’s keep in mind that what Reema Dodin said was much more sinister than her expressing her support for the Palestinian Arabs, or her conviction – assuming she has it — that Israel was built on “occupied land,” or that Israel must “return to the 1949 armistice lines.” No, she said that she understood what led Palestinians to become suicide bombers – these were the “last resort of a desperate people.” Reema Dodin was explaining — and justifying — the cold-blooded murder of innocent civilians. COLUMN BY
On the same day that Arizona certified former Vice President Joe Biden as the winner of the state’s 11 electoral votes, state lawmakers held a fact-finding meeting Monday on allegations of voter fraud that might have tilted the closely contested state.
Biden appears to have won the traditionally Republican-leaning state by just over 10,000 votes. However, witnesses told state lawmakers that mail-in voting fraud and problems with the Dominion Voting Systems machines could have skewed the results.
Dominion has vigorously defended its machines, stating on its website:
According to a Joint Statement by the federal government agency that oversees U.S. election security, the Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency: “There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised.” The government & private sector councils that support this mission called the 2020 election “the most secure in American history.”
The left is actively working to undermine the integrity of our elections. Read the plan to stop them now. Learn more now >>
The event was not a formal legislative hearing, since the Legislature is out of session, but Republican members of both the state Senate and the state House of Representatives participated in the panel, asking questions of witnesses.
The event, which began in late morning and ran well into the evening, wasn’t held at the state Capitol, but rather off-site at a Hyatt Regency hotel in Phoenix, with a “Stop the Steal” rally of supporters of President Donald Trump going on outside.
“The purpose of this public hearing, an inquiry into the integrity of the election that just passed, is to provide a forum where no others have been permitted for the president’s litigation team to present the evidence and testimony,” said Arizona state Rep. Mark Finchem, a Republican, who organized the hearing, adding:
We are caught between the desire to trust the process and the suspicion that it has failed the people of Arizona, and potentially the people of our sister states. If there is voter disenfranchisement, we must identify its source and eradicate it, as we would any disease.
The following are four highlights from the Arizona legislators’ hearing.
1) 35,000 Fraudulent Votes?
If the allegations are true, the biggest news to come out of the forum was the possible addition of 35,000 illegal Democratic votes.
Retired Army Col. Phil Waldron, a cybersecurity expert, testified that an anonymous email from a Pima County tech provider alleged that 35,000 votes were illegitimately given to Democratic candidates in that county.
“He wanted to remain anonymous, but had enough concern that he wanted to send this to the Criminal Division of the U.S. Department of Justice,” Waldron said. “He did not want to be included in the investigation, but the information they recorded is what we would like the opportunity to investigate on your behalf or a forensics team of your choosing. It doesn’t matter to us.”
If the allegation of illicit votes is true, the 35,000 votes would be more than three times enough votes to flip Arizona to Trump. However, the anonymous individual is apparently thus far unwilling to provide a name or sign an affidavit under penalty of perjury.
“So, this coincides with the data analytics at that spike. We weren’t aware of this email until after the fact. So, there were approximately 35,000 fraud votes added to each Democratic candidate’s vote totals,” Waldron told the lawmakers.
He read from the message that said, “The candidates impacted include county, state, and federal election candidates,” and talked about the alleged 35,000 votes added for Democrats.
The anonymous person also alleged Democratic Party members invited him or her to a meeting on Sept. 10 and outlined a plan to add those votes.
The message from the anonymous person, displayed on a screen, said:
When I asked how in the world will 35,000 votes be kept hidden from being discovered, it was stated that spread distribution will be embedded across the entire registered-voter range and will not exceed the registered-vote count, and the 35,000 was determined allowable in Pima County, based on our county registered-vote count.
It was also stated that total voter turnout versus total registered voters determine how many votes we can embed.
Maricopa [County] embed totals would be substantially higher than Pima’s due to embeds being based upon the total number of registered voters.
When I asked if this has been tested and how do we know it works, the answer was yes, and has shown success in Arizona judicial-retention elections since 2014, even undetectable in post-audits because no candidate will spend the kind of funds needed to audit and contact voters to verify votes in the full potential of total registered voters, which is more than 500,000 registered voters.
Still, Waldron said he would prefer the person identify himself on the record and under oath.
“We hoped this individual would come forward and issue this as an affidavit, but this is significant, and we also noted that the reporting numbers from Pima and Maricopa counties merged Election Day votes with write-in votes, with absentee ballots,” Waldron said. “So, there is no way in the publicly available data to parse those votes into the segments.”
2) Certifying Biden
Top state officials, including Arizona’s Republican governor, Doug Ducey, announced the certification of Biden as the winner of the state’s 11 electoral votes.
The governor tweeted, “Today, we signed the canvass for the 2020 election in Arizona. I’m grateful to the voters, the county election offices, the county recorders’ offices, & the poll workers across the state for their dedication to the success of our election system.”
Today, we signed the canvass for the 2020 election in Arizona. I’m grateful to the voters, the county election offices, the county recorders’ offices, & the poll workers across the state for their dedication to the success of our election system. @SecretaryHobbs@GeneralBrnovichpic.twitter.com/vdjhuQosZd
Arizona House Democrats mocked the hearing in a tweet as a “meaningless waste of time at a downtown Phoenix hotel” and called for state residents to focus on the certification of a Biden victory and other election results.
Instead of that meaningless waste of time happening at a downtown Phoenix hotel, let's watch AZSOS @katiehobbs, Gov. @dougducey AG @GeneralBrnovich and Chief Justice Brutinel oversee Arizona's official election canvas and certification, shall we?. https://t.co/6bX6nZi0mf
However, during the hearing, former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, Trump’s personal lawyer, spoke out against efforts to certify the election with so many unanswered questions. A former federal prosecutor, he even suggested it might be illegal to certify the vote.
“The vote as it presently exists is false. It’s fraudulent. If they certify it, they are certifying a false statement to the United States of America. Gosh, when I was a prosecutor, that was a federal crime,” Giuliani said.
“It’s clear that the numbers are false. It’s clear that you have included ballots that aren’t properly inspected. It is clear that you are including ballots that are voted by other people,” Giuliani, a former U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, continued, adding:
It’s clear that you are using machines that have been shown to be totally manipulated in other places, and you won’t give us the opportunity to examine those machines. I think anybody who puts their name on that is getting very close to committing a crime.
3) ‘It’s Your Power’
Moreover, Giuliani stressed to the Arizona legislators that what the governor and secretary of state say might be irrelevant.
He said in 1892, the U.S. Supreme Court clarified that Article 2, Section 1 of the United States Constitution gives state legislatures the sole authority to select their representatives to the Electoral College as a means of providing a safeguard against voter fraud and election manipulation.
“It’s your constitutional power solely. That clause doesn’t say governors. It doesn’t say Congress. It doesn’t say newspapers. It says state legislatures,” Giuliani said. “The Supreme Court has said you can change that and take that power back anytime you want to, because it’s your power. It’s not theirs. Whatever power the governor or the secretary of state thinks they are exercising isn’t theirs; it’s the legislature’s. You can take it back.”
At that, those in attendance at the forum began to cheer.
“Based on evidence, you can make a determination. What is the right count? How can we get as close to the right count as possible? If we can, then have the courage to select that person to get the electors, because that person won the honest vote,” Giuliani said.
He told the assembled state legislators not to fear the media’s wrath and that if they determined the real, accurate vote, history would view them as heroes.
“I’m going to ask you to fight. I’m going to ask you to implore the other members of your Legislature to stand up to this,” Giuliani said. “Do not be bullied. Do not be frightened. Your political career is worth losing if you can save the right to vote in America.”
That also prompted applause from the audience.
Jenna Ellis, another of the president’s personal attorneys, stressed they weren’t asking lawmakers to reverse the election, but to investigate fraud and determine if the results are legitimate before appointing electors for Biden.
“We are going to ask you, as legislators, to reclaim that authority and to make sure that the people of Arizona and indeed the people of the United States of America as a whole are not disenfranchised by corruption,” Ellis told the panel.
She quoted Founding Father Alexander Hamilton in Federalist 68 noting that state legislatures are the safeguard against corruption.
“You are the last step to make sure that this election is not corrupted,” Ellis said. “We are not asking you to step up and overturn an election. We are asking you to step in to make sure that the corruption that occurred here does not stand.”
However, The Arizona Republic newspaper reported it would be highly unlikely for the Legislature—being out of session—to reconvene to appoint a new set of electors. That’s because it would require a supermajority to call the Legislature back into session. The GOP governor could also call the Legislature back, but he has already agreed the state should certify Biden as the winner.
4) Absentee Ballots, Duplicate Ballots, and 130%
The Trump legal team also presented information from the Voter Integrity Fund, playing audio of several calls to people recorded as having requested an absentee ballot. Each said they did not do so.
Another witness for the Trump team was Shiva Ayyadurai, a former Senate candidate from Massachusetts and entrepreneur and engineer offering expert testimony on technology and data.
He presented data asserting the only way for Biden to have statistically caught up with Trump after trailing him early on was if the registered Democratic votes were 130% in favor of Biden and negative 30% for Trump. He showed a chart on a screen to explain the findings.
“What’s extraordinary about this graph is, again, we went through many, many iterations, it matches perfectly, near perfectly,” Ayyadurai told the Arizona state legislators. “The slopes match, the curves match. The shapes match. So, what this tells us is that this demographic distribution of allocation of party affiliations is what can generate this.
“I find it highly implausible, because this means that Mr. Biden got 130% of Democrat voters, and Mr. Trump got negative 30%.”
Anna Orth, a Pima County resident and Republican election worker, testified to the committee that she was denied the chance to observe about 2,000 duplicate ballots. Duplicate ballots are usually ballots that are somehow unclearly marked and require further inspection, typically by observers from both parties.
“I was specifically taken out of that room, ushered out, and brought into [another] room,” Orth told the state lawmakers. COLUMN BY
Election fraud is already a problem. Soon it could be a crisis. But election fraud is not the only threat to the integrity of our election system.
Progressives are pushing for nine “reforms” that could increase the opportunity for fraud and dissolve the integrity of constitutional elections. To counter these dangerous measures, our friends at The Heritage Foundation are proposing seven measures to protect your right to vote and ensure fair, constitutional elections.
They are offering it to readers of The Daily Signal for free today.
Get the details now when you download your free copy of, “Mandate for Leadership: Ensuring the Integrity of Our Election System.”
“These are not just fraudulent acts, they are treasonous acts, because it means changing the government!” “When you coordinate six to ten states, using cyber warfare, to change the outcome of the election in favor of whoever you want, these are treasonous acts,” McInerney said in a Nov. 29 interview with Brannon Howse of Worldview Weekend TV.
In what might arguably be the best, most valuable, work in a body of unparalleled work from our friend Leo Hohmann comes this report of what the respected general has advised the President to do to put down the coupagainst the government being waged with a new type of warfare unanticipated by our founding fathers.
And, he tells us what we must do now because the way the Socialist/Communist conspirators could win is by continuing to sow the seeds of chaos/confusion and thus paralyze us into inaction. You already know the feeling!
From Leohohmann.com
McInerney lays out strategy to defeat deep-state coup plotters
Lt. Gen. Thomas McInerney [U.S. Air Force Retired] said in a no-holds-barred interview that he doesn’t believe the courts are likely to come through for President Trump. The general placed the burden squarely on President Trump to use the emergency powers at his disposal and put down what he described as a coup d’état in progress. Despite massive amounts of evidence of widespread irregularities, many judges appear either unable or unwilling to sort through allegations of rigged voting machines and dozens of affidavits from eyewitnesses to ballot stuffing, denial of Republican poll watchers from observing the process, evidence of more votes cast in hundreds of precincts than were registered to vote, and a host of other irregularities.
[….]
McInerney said that after listening to President Trump talk with Fox News’ Maria Bartiromo on Sunday morning, he was concerned that the president “sounded kind of down.” “What startled me was, he kept talking about fraudulent votes, and then I heard Rudy Giuliani talking about fraudulent votes. It’s not fraudulent votes. The American people must understand, we are talking about treason.” The oath must be fulfilled
McInerney said President Trump must be compelled by his supporters to “honor his oath of office” and employ the tools available to him to quash the insurrection that he believes is in progress.
Keep readingas he makes his case! And, then see what he says to answer those of us who might not be sure of what we are seeing….
If America doesn’t “wake up” and realize what’s happening it will soon be too late, he said. This is corroborated by people who in earlier decades lived through the socialist revolutions that took over Cuba, Venezuela, China, Germany, Russia, Vietnam and Cambodia. When asked “how did this happen” and “did you see it coming,” almost to a person, they will tell you that, yes, they saw it and they knew their country was heading in a bad direction. But, at the end, confusion reigned as events transpired so fast that the people felt paralyzed and unable to stop the fall of their government.
What to do first! After all, there are 70 plus million of us!
McInerney is recommending that people email or tweet to the president a message asking him to invoke the Insurrection Act and the September 2018 executive order, declare a national emergency and suspend the meeting of the Electoral College on Dec. 14 until a full investigation by military tribunals can be conducted into the many election irregularities that, if found to be true, would constitute a blatant act of treason against the republic.
You can email the White House by going to Whitehouse.gov/contact,and the president’s Twitter handle is @RealDonaldTrump. “It’s important for every America citizen to understand that you are now facing, for the first time, hybrid modern warfare, where the enemy is unseen, it’s stealthy. Be aware America, be afraid, be concerned, rise up. We cannot let this election, these treasonous acts, this coup d’état, to stand.”
Do just what the Left does, take control of the language. This is much worse than the usual lying, cheating and fraud. Use the words: modern warfare,coup d’état and treason. Continue readingfor more steps you can take in the days, weeks, months ahead. Watch the entire interview.
https://libertyfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/logo_v6_225x110.png00Ann Corcoranhttps://libertyfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/logo_v6_225x110.pngAnn Corcoran2020-12-01 07:07:102020-12-01 07:07:10Lt. Gen. Thomas McInerney: Do Not Be Confused! This is Treason!
The recount process was paused Sunday in Fulton County, Georgia, after a newly-purchased Dominion Voting Systems mobile server crashed due to human error.
“Technicians from Dominion have been dispatched to resolve the issue,” Fulton County officials said in a statement, according to 11Alive. “The Georgia Secretary of State’s office has also been alerted to the issue and is aware of efforts to resolve the problem.”
A spokesperson for the Secretary of State’s office told the Daily Caller that the issue was due to an unidentified Fulton County election official simply not following instructions.
Gabriel Sterling, the voting system implementation manager for Georgia, said the server crashed because the county “literally ignored the basic instructions and the directions of the vendor on this one,” according to 11Alive.
The spokesperson for the Secretary of State told the Daily Caller that the county was given an express server for logic and accuracy testing on the machines set to be used in tomorrow’s 5th district runoff election.
However, the county tried to “cut a corner” by using the express server to recount the presidential elections despite a Dominion employee reportedly telling the county not to do that, according to 11Alive. This caused the server to crash because a security measure flagged the process after the timestamps were off.
“It has nothing to do with servers being wiped. Nobody directed that. That’s just a lie,” Sterling said, according to the report. “It’s made up out of whole cloth. And it is the kind of stuff we are having to deal with.”
The issue has been correct, according to the Secretary of State spokesperson.
Fulton County officials did not respond to the Daily Caller’s request for comment at the time of publication.
Fulton has reportedly finished counting 88 percent of all ballots cast, including absentee, early in-person and provisional ballots, according to 11Alive. All Georgia counties must complete the recount by Dec. 2.
Republican Gov. Brian Kemp certified the election results Nov. 20, cementing President-elect Joe Biden as the winner. Biden won the state by 12,670 votes, prompting the Trump campaign to request a recount.
#BREAKING: Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp says he'll certify election results: "State law now requires the Governor's office to formalize the certification, which paves the way for the Trump campaign to pursue other legal options in a separate recount if they choose." pic.twitter.com/LHWUKMCjjd
President Donald Trump accused Kemp on Sunday of having done “absolutely nothing” to question the election results while branding Raffensperger as an “enemy of the people” for allowing what he called a “fraudulent system” to operate in the state, according to Fox News.
Trump suggested Monday that Kemp, “the hapless Governor of Georgia,” should force Georgia counties to match signatures on envelopes during the recount.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1333410418119864320?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1333410418119864320%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fdailycaller.com%2F2020%2F11%2F30%2Ffulton-county-georgia-recount-delayed-dominion-voting-systems%2F
When voters submit an absentee ballot request on a paper application, they must sign it. Election officials then compare that signature with the signature in voter registration files before a ballot is sent out, according to the Associated Press (AP). When the ballots are returned, the signature on the outer envelope is again compared to the signature in the voter registration system, according to the AP.
However, the recount process does not include the revivification of signatures found on absentee ballots, according to The New York Times (NYT). Once election officials match the signature on the outer envelope to the signature in the voting registration system upon receipt of an absentee ballot, the envelope and ballot are separated to protect voters’ privacy, according to the NYT. Therefore, there is no way to match the ballot signatures during a recount. COLUMN BY
https://libertyfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/logo_v6_225x110.png00The Daily Callerhttps://libertyfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/logo_v6_225x110.pngThe Daily Caller2020-12-01 06:49:332020-12-01 06:49:33Dominion Voting Systems Server Crash That Caused Delay In Georgia Recount
Back in June 2011 I wrote a column titled, “Why Business Leaders Scare People.” This was triggered by then-private citizen Donald Trump considering a run for the 2012 presidential election, which eventually went to Mitt Romney as the Republican candidate who failed to take down President Obama. Prior to this, we hadn’t a true businessman run for president, except for possibly Herbert Hoover who was a geologist and understood mining. The intent of my column back then was to consider whether the American people would support such a business person. In reading the article nine years later, I consider it rather prophetic.
I wrote, “When it looked like Donald Trump was going to throw his hat into the presidential ring not long ago, it electrified everyone including his supporters, opponents, and the Main Stream Media. His blunt talk was refreshing to his supporters and scared the hell out of everyone else. The Main Stream Media went right to work undermining his bid as they started to believe he could take down the president (Obama). He was ridiculed for everything from his hair, to his clothes, to his talk. The fact remains though, Trump scared them to death. Now I am not here to defend Donald Trump or explain his exit from the political stage. I’m not even a fan of his popular television show, ‘The Celebrity Apprentice.’ It is his image as a successful businessman who wanted to correct the ills of the country, and the reaction that ensued, which intrigues me. This is not so much about Trump as it is about any business leader who would want to be taken seriously on the political stage.”
I went on to describe the three traits making a business leader successful:
“Is entrepreneurial in spirit, a visionary who knows how to recognize opportunity and capitalize on it and in the process is willing to assume risk. He/she is a gambler who knows how to calculate the odds.
Knows how to get things done. More than possessing academic knowledge, such a person usually possesses an unusual amount of practical ‘street smarts.’
Knows how to make hard decisions. A true business leader understands he is in the business of solving problems, not running from them. Yes, he will delegate some decisions and ask for advice from others, but he also understands the buck stops with him and will go to great lengths to see the business not only survives but prospers as well. Hopefully, he understands the best business deal is when all parties involved prosper.
It’s this last element which scares the public. Whereas others agonize over making a decision, the business leader knows how to define and weigh pros and cons, calculate the best solution to benefit the enterprise, and make a decision. It is called ‘business’ and some people are simply jealous of those equipped with the faculties to take rather large and complex issues and make some rather commonsense decisions. It is not the fear of a ruthless dictator which scares people; rather, it is the envy of someone who knows how to consistently make a logical decision, not an emotional one which most people tend to embrace. Further, when a decision is made, business leaders do not necessarily sugar coat their rationale which tends to make them appear abrasive to others, thereby creating fodder for the Main Stream Media.”
So far, I was batting 1.000 in terms of describing the future president. It was his ability to tackle major decisions with commonsense solutions which disturbed the media and his political opponents. Towards the end of the article, I pondered how the country would react to a President Trump.
“One last element that disturbs some people is that business leaders tend to be capitalists, not socialists. For obvious reasons, this scares the left, including the Main Stream Media. Make no mistake, this next election is about two extremes: capitalism versus socialism. Whereas the former defends the concept of the free enterprise system and smaller government, the latter is the antithesis.”
Plain and simple, people find successful business-types as either a God-send or very abrasive. To President Trump’s supporters, he was a breath of fresh air who delivered on his promises and made considerable achievements even in the face of a resistant Congress. To his opponents, President Trump is perceived as a genuine threat to the Washington “Swamp,” which worked overtime to fight him. To illustrate, consider what President Trump faced during his first administration:
The rise of “Fake News.”
The rise of the “resistance” movement, both in the Congress and the streets.
https://libertyfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/logo_v6_225x110.png00Tim Brycehttps://libertyfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/logo_v6_225x110.pngTim Bryce2020-12-01 06:26:382020-12-01 06:26:38PODCAST: Should Business Leaders Run the Country?
D-bags cried Russia, Russia, Russia! for four tortured years, but refuse to consider the “unambiguous evidence” that Dominion Voter Systems servers were accessible to and were “certainly compromised by rogue actors.”
“Absolutely frightening” evidence of entrenched fraud.
https://twitter.com/dmills3710/status/1332018002674544642?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1332018090524217351%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es2_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fgellerreport.com%2F2020%2F11%2Faffidavit-digital-forensic-analysis-shows-dominions-server-connected-to-iran-and-china.html%2F
https://twitter.com/dmills3710/status/1332018379369144320?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1332018944354504705%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es2_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fgellerreport.com%2F2020%2F11%2Faffidavit-digital-forensic-analysis-shows-dominions-server-connected-to-iran-and-china.html%2F
https://twitter.com/dmills3710/status/1332018944354504705?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1332018988314976256%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es2_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fgellerreport.com%2F2020%2F11%2Faffidavit-digital-forensic-analysis-shows-dominions-server-connected-to-iran-and-china.html%2F
Digital Forensic Analysis Shows Dominion’s Server Connected to Iran and China: Affidavit
Analysis Shows Dominion’s Server Connected to Iran and China: Affidavit
By Tom Ozimek, The Epoch Times, November 27, 2020:
A digital forensic analysis by a former military intelligence analyst whose name was redacted in an affidavit accompanying attorney Sidney Powell’s lawsuit against Michigan officials, claims to present “unambiguous evidence” that Dominion Voter Systems servers were accessible to and were “certainly compromised by rogue actors, such asPowell’s complaint, filed on Nov. 25 against Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, and the Michigan Board of State Canvassers, cites the affidavit (pdf) as authored by a former electronic intelligence analyst under 305th Military Intelligence and purporting to show that “the Dominion software was accessed by agents acting on behalf of China and Iran in order to monitor and manipulate elections, including the most recent US general election in 2020.”A separate complaint (pdf) in Georgia, expands on the assertion, claiming that, “by using servers and employees connected with rogue actors and hostile foreign influences combined with numerous easily discoverable leaked credentials, Dominion neglectfully allowed foreign adversaries to access data and intentionally provided access to their infrastructure in order to monitor and manipulate elections, including the most recent one in 2020.”The analyst, who claimed to have “extensive experience as a white hat hacker used by some of the top election specialists in the world,” said that they scanned Dominion network nodes and found a number of interrelationships with foreign entities, including access to Dominion’s server by a network from Hunan, China. Another forensic review confirmed links to an Iranian IP address, the analyst wrote, and concluded that the totality of “these scanning behaviors showed that foreign agents of aggressor nations had access to US voter lists, and had done so recently.”The analyst said the findings represent a “complete failure” on the part of Dominion to provide “basic cyber security.”
“This is not a technological issue, but rather a governance and basic security issue: if it is not corrected, future elections in the United States and beyond will not be secure and citizens will not have confidence in the results,” the analyst concluded.
Dominion has not responded to a query from The Epoch Times regarding the allegations, although the company issued a statement on Wednesday, the same day Powell filed the Michigan lawsuit, with Dominion saying there were “unfounded allegations being made against the company and its voting systems” in recent days.
The company added: “Dominion voting systems are designed and certified by the U.S. government to be closed and do not rely on network connectivity. Dominion’s tabulators also do not have exposed USB or other memory ports.”
It came after Powell alleged in her lawsuit that “hundreds of thousands of illegal, ineligible, duplicate, or purely fictitious ballots” were enabled by “massive election fraud.”
The suit claimed that election software and hardware from Dominion Voting Systems used by the Michigan Board of State Canvassers helped facilitate the fraud.
“The Dominion systems derive from the software designed by Smartmatic Corporation, which became Sequoia in the United States,” the complaint reads (pdf).
Dominion said that it has no financial or organizational ties to Smartmatic, although it said it purchased assets from a company formerly owned by Smartmatic. Both Dominion and Smartmatic have denied ties to foreign governments.
https://libertyfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/logo_v6_225x110.png00Pamela Gellerhttps://libertyfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/logo_v6_225x110.pngPamela Geller2020-11-30 14:14:262020-11-30 14:14:26Affidavit: Digital Forensic Analysis Shows Dominion’s Server Connected to Iran and China
Although Nevada’s Supreme Court ruled to certify the state’s election results, the Trump campaign’s lawsuit filed on Nov. 17 will get a hearing in court.
On Wednesday, Judge James Todd Russell agreed to hear the Trump campaign’s most recent case on Dec. 3. Team Trump originally asked to depose 30 witnesses, but because of the Thanksgiving holiday, the judge saw fit to bring that number down to just 15.
This new update from the Trump campaign follows some grim news that broke on Tuesday when the Supreme Court of Nevada approved the state canvassing board’s certification of the 2020 election results. This potentially gives the state’s six electoral votes to Joe Biden.
A series of events brought the state’s election to this precipice. Timeline
Nov. 05 – First Trump campaign lawsuit filed in Nevada
Nov. 16 – Clark County Commission certifies the 2020 election results, except for District C (owing to “discrepancies”)
Nov. 17 – Trump campaign files second lawsuit
Nov. 24 – Nevada Supreme Court certifies results for the Nevada 2020 election
Nov. 25 – Nevada district court judge agrees to hear Trump campaign lawsuit
Mail-in ballots and the Agilis voting machine
The Trump campaign’s lawsuit filed on Nov. 17 alleges there are multiple instances of mail-in ballot irregularities, out-of-state voting, voters casting multiple ballots, dead people voting and vote-buying by a local outreach group.
Adam Laxalt, co-chairman of the Trump campaign in Nevada, also went after the “Agilis machine” and its role in gathering votes for Clark County. This machine was used to verify hundreds of thousands of signatures. No GOP official was able to physically look at or personally verify these signatures in Nevada’s most populous county.
Even more disquieting is the fact that the machine’s accuracy setting was turned down before the votes came rolling in. The low setting rendered the machine virtually useless in verifying signatures, according to the Trump campaign.
Clark County certifies, except for one local race
On Nov. 16, the Trump campaign thought it had achieved a small victory in the infamous Clark County when the Clark County Commission certified the results for each race except for one district race. Registrar Joe Gloria went in front of the commission and made his case that the District C race was not able to be certified because it contained 139 discrepancies.
“Sidney Powell is no joke. She served as a federal prosecutor for ten years and earned a national reputation as the attorney who swooped in, convinced Ret. Gen. Michael Flynn to withdraw his guilty pleas, and successfully pressured the Justice Department to drop its charges. She was a stalwart and regular presence in exposing the Russia Collusion Hoax, and by my count, everything she said was going to happen did happen.” – John Nolte, Journalist “First of all, I never say anything I can’t prove… and President Trump won by not just hundreds of thousands of votes, but by millions of votes that were shifted by this software that was designed expressly for that purpose. We have sworn witness testimony of why the software was designed. It was designed to rig elections. They also used an algorithm to calculate the votes they would need to flip, and they used computers to flip those votes from…Trump to Biden.” – Sidney Powell “We have and army of digital soldiers. This was irregular warfare at its finest in politics. We have what we call here citizen journalists because the journalists we have in our media did a disservice to themselves.” – General Michael T. Flynn
Sidney Powell was never a part of President Trump’s Legal Team. Many of us assumed she was after the press conference. We also had that impression because whenever Sidney was on media, she was introduced as part of President Trump’s legal team. She never signed a contract or accepted a retainer or funds for her expenses.
The Trump team issued a statement stating that Sidney Powell is not a member of the Trump Legal Team. “Sidney Powell is practicing law on her own. She is not a member of the Trump Legal Team. She is also not a lawyer for the President in his personal capacity.” This was signed by Rudy Giuliani, Attorney for President Trump, and Jenna Ellis, Trump Campaign Senior Legal Adviser and Attorney for President Trump. When Sidney tried to respond on Twitter, she was censored for 12 hours.
Michael Flynn Jr. responded on Parler that Sidney was suspended by Twitter when she tried to respond to the Trump team statement that she understands the White House press release and agrees with it. Flynn Jr. stated that the earlier messages from the President’s team is not a reflection of any misstatements on Sidney’s part. She is staying the course to prove the massive deliberate election fraud that robbed “we the people” of our votes for President Trump and many other republican candidates. General Flynn tweeted much the same.
Joe Hoft of The Gateway Pundit reported that Sidney Powell not being on the Trump team is an act to protect both her and Trump’s team. It is not a message of disappointment in her latest interviews and actions.
Sidney Powell is not restrained or restricted with control from government checks and balances to release statements; she’s more powerful and dangerous without restraints from government entities.
Powell’s Statement
Attorney Powell released a statement to CBS news. She said, “I will continue to represent #WeThePeople who had their votes for Trump and other Republicans stolen by massive fraud through Dominion and Smartmatic, and we will be filing suit soon. The chips will fall where they may, and we will defend the foundations of this great Republic. #KrakenOnSteroids.”
Every rotten lying leftwing media rag reported that Sidney was fired. Politico said she was cut from the team. The AP said the legal team distanced themselves from her, and the Guardian said the Trump team cut ties with her after she made bizarre election fraud claims. None of these headlines are true. By now, anyone with an ounce of intelligence has figured out that the demonic mainstream media spews nothing but lies and half-truths.
Sidney Powell, General Mike Flynn, L. Lin Woods, Rudy Giuliani and so many other attorneys and state attorney generals across the nation are fighting the greatest fraud and treason ever perpetrated on this country.
If you love this nation and love freedom and liberty, you must help. Please donate to Sidney Powell, who has hired experts in their field to prove the treachery and betrayal of the American people and equal representation of one person, one vote.
Her website is Defendingtherepublic.org and includes an address if you prefer mailing a check.
President Trump Pardon’s General Flynn
And now the General is free to go full bore to help Sidney Powell and prove the fraudulent election was stolen from President Trump. General Flynn was innocent of all of the charges, and taking a pardon was not what they wanted, but his help in saving our republic was more important than any financial reciprocity he could receive from those who framed him.
Michael Flynn is not only free to speak, but free to openly help save the nation he spent 33 years serving and defending. I love this brave warrior and his entire family. He deserves the respect and admiration of every American, not only for his service, but for enduring with God’s grace and fortitude a four-year crucible of pain inflicted by the Deep State traitors.
His first interview since President Trump gave him a “pardon of innocence,” was with his friend Lt. General Thomas McInerny on Brannon Howse’s broadcast. It is essential that every patriotic American hear these two men speak.
General Flynn tells us the president has clear paths to victory that don’t require a lot of courtroom action. What it requires is honesty from elected officials and the many Americans who are coming forward and telling their stories, and not just from battleground states. They are witnesses and they’re signing affidavits.
Like so many others who are standing for freedom and justice, these witnesses, both republican and democrat, are being threatened and they’re angry…so angry that they’re sending in their pictures with their affidavits.
General Flynn believes President Trump will win Pennsylvania, Arizona, Georgia, Nevada, Michigan and probably Wisconsin where they just discovered a discrepancy in 130,000 ballots. Mike said he was asked on a scale of one to 10 who will be president and he answered, Donald Trump.
He said, “Theft with mail in ballots, theft with Dominion and Smartmatic is done by election machines not made in America and our votes are not even counted in our own country. We have so many previous elections with the same situations, but we’re in this to win and we will.”
Censorship
The only way the President has to communicate is via social media and they are censoring him. The Pennsylvania hearing was run by a retired military colonel, Doug Mastriano, and he gave a wonderful patriotic speech, but not one word was carried by the mainstream media and twitter took him offline immediately. This is the destruction of our first amendment rights.
The rudeness throughout America has affected our wonderful president and beautiful first lady for four years and we’re angry about it…there is no decency, no respect, and no honor for the leader of the greatest nation in the world. Why? Because he doesn’t belong to the cabal promoting a new world order like Carter, the Bushes, Clinton, Obama and dozens before them all the way back to Woodrow Wilson.
Efforts to remove our duly elected president by every pressure the socialist democrats could think of was endless, whether it’s the fake Russia gate or impeachment, the filthy lousy lying mess with Covid-19, or this coup d’état…all are dangerous to the survival of the Republic.
General Flynn states that when our enemy tells us they’re going to do something, you had better pay attention and have some plans.
Lt. General Thomas McInerny
General McInerny said that shutting down vote counting in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Arizona, Nevada and Georgia was not based on normal system operations. The General reported, “These swing states stopped counting and shut down in the early morning hours of November 4th, which shows us it was planned and caused by fraudulent electronic manipulation of the targeted voting machines. This was unprecedented to stop counting in five of the battleground states and demonstrates prior coordination by election officials.”
Media had reported that counting had ceased in the five states, when in reality, the counting continued and in early morning hours, all of a sudden there were hundreds of thousands more votes and all for VP Biden, when only hours before President Trump had a massive lead. This is where cyberwarfare was employed via the Hammer and Scorecard plus the Dominion voting machines and software.
McInerny said, “Every one of these states had the same percentage of votes that were tallied during the “shutdown hours” and this is a mathematical impossibility and means an algorithm was used. Pennsylvania mailed out 1.8 million mail-in ballots and got 2.5 million back.”
Sidney Powell has filed a number of lawsuits against these states. Her complaint, filed last Wednesday against Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, and the Board of State Canvassers, cites the affidavit as representing a former electronic intelligence analyst and supporting claims that, “the Dominion software was accessed by agents acting on behalf of China and Iran in order to monitor and manipulate elections, including the most recent US general election in 2020.” Now it is being reported that Russia was also involved.
Kraken
Kraken is not some monster from a movie. General McInerny believes that it was Sidney Powell and the President through General Flynn who got the Kraken organization, the 305 military intelligence battalion, working with them. The Kraken is a Department of Defense, Cyber Warfare Program designed to track, hack, expose, and acquire evidence of nefarious activity from enemies both foreign and domestic. Link The General says we have not seen any footprints from the DOJ, the FBI, or the CIA in this on the friendly side, only on the Deep State side.
The US Special Forces command seized a server farm in Frankfurt, Germany because the data from these battleground states were being sent through the internet to Spain and then into Frankfurt, Germany. Special Operations seized that facility, which was a CIA operation, and they have those servers. It has been reported that five US soldiers were killed in this operation along with one paratrooper. McInerny believes the servers will show the algorithms and the vast fraudulent cheating in the 2020 election.
General Flynn was the Senior US Intelligence Military officer in the US commands at the Defense Intelligence Agency. He is a career intelligence officer and General McInerny says Flynn knows this stuff backwards and forwards. McInerny tells us that the entire Deep State and the Democrat Party of Pelosi, Schiff, Nadler, etc. were involved in this coup d’état. He includes the judiciary and Judge Emmett Sullivan who was Michael Flynn’s biased and belligerent judge and that is why the Kraken was involved, because the President could trust them.
McInerny stated, “This isn’t just politics, this is treason, and it’s been used before. We haven’t seen treason of this magnitude in our history. We are going to demand that this president not leave office until the American people have a full disclosure of what has gone on.”
President Trump took an oath to the Constitution and to defend America from enemies both foreign and domestic. The perpetrators of this communist revolutionary third world voting system are domestic enemies and traitors to the United States of America. This is why President Trump should remain in office until we see justice.
Powell, Flynn, McInerny and all the others working on exposing the fraudulent votes in these and many other states, along with every deplorable, believe that President Trump overwhelmingly won with as many as 400 – 410 electoral votes.
General McInerny talked about all of this in 2017 on Dave Janda’s show.
The American Report
Mary Fanning and Alan Jones have been at the top of the game with regard to the Hammer/Scorecard cheating. In 2015, whistleblower Dennis Montgomery gave sworn testimony to the DOJ and FBI about Scorecard, Dominion and Smartmatic. Obviously, it has been ignored. There are many avenues of truth on the web, but The American Report is superb. Bookmark the site.
https://libertyfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/logo_v6_225x110.png00Kelleigh Nelsonhttps://libertyfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/logo_v6_225x110.pngKelleigh Nelson2020-11-30 13:43:102020-11-30 13:43:10Saving The Republic From High Treason
WhatsHerFace posted the following on her YouTube channel:
The orchestration of humanity’s demise goes by many names: The Great Reset, Agenda 21, Agenda 2030, the 4th Industrial Revolution and The New World Order. No matter the name, the goal remains. It is the complete servitude of the world’s population under the guise of righteousness. The elites will stop at nothing to manipulate and change the minds of people, having them believe up is down, good is bad, freedom is slavery and ignorance is strength. But humanity is resilient and endures, we will not be overcome.
https://libertyfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/logo_v6_225x110.png00Vlad Tepes Bloghttps://libertyfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/logo_v6_225x110.pngVlad Tepes Blog2020-11-30 13:13:482020-11-30 13:13:48VIDEO: What is ‘The Great Reset?’ This explanation is probably better than most.
Welcome to our latest Energy & Environmental Newsletter… (For all 2020 Newsletters, go here. To review the current issue, see below.)… Note: a team of experts has volunteered their time to improve US voting integrity. A Michigan analysisis a sample of one of their reports.
https://libertyfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/logo_v6_225x110.png00Oleg Atbashianhttps://libertyfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/logo_v6_225x110.pngOleg Atbashian2020-11-30 07:44:432021-10-08 00:51:34‘Science says’ is a game anyone can play
“Relish the opportunity to be an outsider! Embrace the label! It is the outsiders who change the world!”
(Turn on the sound!)
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1333245684011642881?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1333245684011642881%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ffraudscrookscriminals.com%2F2020%2F11%2F30%2Finspiring-message-from-the-president%2F
https://libertyfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/logo_v6_225x110.png00Ann Corcoranhttps://libertyfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/logo_v6_225x110.pngAnn Corcoran2020-11-30 07:30:192020-11-30 07:30:19Inspiring Message from the President!
Sidney Powell files emergency demand to seize all voting machines for forensic audit
Sidney Powell files emergency demand to seize all voting machines for forensic audit
By: Jon Dougherty | Business Insider | November 29, 2020 |
Powell’s suit, filed Wednesday in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, also seeks an “emergency declaratory judgment that voting machines be seized and impounded immediately for a forensic audit.
The suit came as Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger certified the final results for Biden, who allegedly garnered 49.5 percent of the vote over President Donald Trump’s 49.3 percent, The Associated Press reported. Libertarian nominee Joe Jorgensen garnered 62,138 votes, giving Biden a 12,670-vote advantage, or .25 percent.
On Friday, a hesitant Gov. Brian Kemp certified the state’s 16 electors for Biden, though the AP said he did not do so enthusiastically. Rather, he said state law required him to “formalize the certification, which paves the way for the Trump campaign to pursue other legal options and a separate recount if they choose.”
Kemp has also not voiced his confidence in the integrity of the election in his state as the Trump campaign and other Georgia Republicans have criticized the results as fraudulent.
The governor hasn’t signed on to the Trump campaign’s allegations but he also has not backed fellow Republican Raffensperger, who has claimed the election was fair and secure.
Kemp did say on Friday, though, that a post-election ballot count and audit only examined ballots, not the signatures on absentee ballot applications or absentee ballot envelopes.
“As a former Secretary of State, he is the first to know and confirm that a signature is matched twice prior to an absentee ballot being counted,” Deputy Secretary of State Jordan Fuchs said in a statement.
As for Powell, her lawsuit makes several allegations of outright vote fraud via electronic manipulation, the introduction of fake ballots, and other methods.
“The scheme and artifice to defraud was for the purpose of illegally and fraudulently manipulating the vote count to make certain the election of Joe Biden as President of the United States,” says the lawsuit.
“The fraud was executed by many means, but the most fundamentally troubling, insidious, and egregious is the systemic adaptation of old-fashioned ‘ballot-stuffing.’ It has now been amplified and rendered virtually invisible by computer software created and run by domestic and foreign actors for that very purpose.”
Continuing, the suit alleged, “There is incontrovertible physical evidence that the standards of physical security of the voting machines and the software were breached, and machines were connected to the internet in violation of professional standards and state and federal laws.
“The massive fraud begins with the election software and hardware from Dominion Voting Systems Corporation (‘Dominion’) only recently purchased and rushed into use by Defendants Governor Brian Kemp, Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, and the Georgia Board of Elections,” the suit adds.
“Sequoia voting machines were used in 16 states and the District of Colombia in 2006. Smartmatic, which has revenue of about $100 million, focuses on Venezuela and other markets outside the U.S,” it continued.
In an interview with Fox News last week, Dominion spokesperson Michael Steel denied that machines manipulated votes, calling it “physically impossible.”
Ahead of her filing on Wednesday, Powell posted an open letter to Raffensperger announcing her suit and accusing state officials of refusing “to perform a real audit” the ballots.
Thus far, most lawsuits filed by the Trump campaign and others challenging election results in several battleground states have been dismissed. But on Friday, a group of GOP state lawmakers in Pennsylvania unveiled a resolution ultimately aimed at directing electors to cast ballots for President Trump instead of Biden.
There is mounting evidence that the PA presidential election was compromised. If this is the case, under Article II, Section 1.2 of the US Constitution, the state legislature has the sole authority to direct the manner of selecting delegates to the Electoral College. (1)
Holding conservative beliefs and attitudes probably makes people more determined to marry and have children earlier.
In an election post-mortem interview, progressive election analyst David Shor claimed that increasingly delayed marriage and childbearing have given Democrats an electoral advantage and that these changes in family formation are “reason for hope” for Democrats.
Indeed, the recent presidential election revealed sharp divides in American society: between urban and rural, men and women, Black and white, conservative and liberal.
Less recognized is the way in which different approaches to family life also shaped the 2020 presidential election. Whereas Americans on both sides of the aisle once shared a basic model of family, today our political divisions show up quite literally at birth, with conservatives having (and desiring to have) considerably more children than liberals. We are not only divided by our political visions, but also by our values and behaviors around childbearing and childrearing; that is, by our visions of family life.
One way this shows up is fertility. In this election, the association between fertility rates and voting patterns was crystal clear. The figure below shows the share of a county’s vote won by President Trump vs. the total fertility rate for that county from 2016 to 2019, the latest available data. FIGURE 1
Data about fertility rates is only available for around 600 of the largest counties, thus many small, rural counties are excluded. But the relationship shown here is clear: President Trump did better in counties with higher birth rates, and the difference is fairly large, with the most pro-Biden counties having total fertility rates almost 25% lower than the most pro-Trump counties.
If anything, this effect is understated, since the most pro-Trump counties were small, rural counties that usually have even higher birth rates and are excluded from this analysis. Indeed, Yi Fuxian at the University of Wisconsin showed that the relationship between voting and fertility is even more pronounced when we look at fertility rates and state voting trends.
Nor is the relationship between fertility and presidential voting a spurious result related to urbanization, race, or state practices in drawing county lines. The figure below extends the analysis to more presidential elections, and includes controls for the state a county is in, the county’s non-Hispanic white population share, and the county’s population density. FIGURE 2
As can be seen, the Republican fertility advantage is relatively stable across elections. It even shows up in a panel model, suggesting that as counties become more Republican, their fertility rates tend to rise relative to the national average. The use of state controls (and some robustness tests I ran in large states with many counties) suggests this effect isn’t driven by unique features of states: within Red states or Blue states, and controlling for county racial and ethnic characteristics and population densities, Republican counties have higher birth rates.
This is particularly astonishing given that Democrats perform very well in counties with many Hispanic and black voters, who have higher birth rates than non-Hispanic white Americans (and indeed, the more non-Hispanic whites in a county, the lower its birth rate in my models). The relationship is also unchanged if the sample is restricted to only very-high-density counties, such as those representing the center of major cities. In other words, the Republican “fertility advantage” does not arise from more rural counties with higher birth rates, and it exists despite the fact that much of the Democratic Party’s electoral base is among racial and ethnic groups with higher birth rates in general. The split I identify isn’t about race or urbanization or region of the country: it’s about family. Within racial- or ethnic-groups, within states or urbanized areas, the more conservative areas tend to have more babies.
Election data can only tell us so much. But data from the General Social Survey can be used to provide a more granular understanding of the ideological fertility difference. The figure below shows the number of children ever born to women sampled in the GSS who were over age 44, and women ages 30-44, by political ideology. FIGURE 3
In the 1970s, there was little or no difference in fertility rates between liberal and conservative women. But by the 2000s, completed fertility for liberal women had declined markedly below that of conservative women. In recent years, the gap in childbearing between young conservative and liberal women has really opened, which may portend a bigger gap in the coming years.
This graph has no controls for other factors. But the figure below introduces control variables for women’s age, the year of the survey, women’s race or ethnicity, educational level, and marital status. It shows the difference between conservative and liberal women after all these variables are controlled for, with the period 1972-1994 lumped together as one group, and 1995-2018 lumped together as another group. FIGURE 4
Before the 1990s, fertility differences by ideology were small. Women over age 45 had no difference in completed fertility, and women of all ages (but with controls for year of age) had only a small difference. There was, however, already a difference in ideology: conservative women reported a childbearing ideal about 0.12 kids higher than liberal women, which is a small, but significant, difference.
For the period after 1995, however, gaps grow. Conservative women over age 45 had about 0.25 more children on average than their liberal peers, an effect which in fact shows up throughout the age distribution once the “over 45” restriction is relaxed. The gap in fertility ideals grew larger as well.
In other words, the “family gap” between conservatives and liberals is a new phenomenon. It’s only in the last two decades that conservatives began to reap a fertility advantage. But it’s not just a fertility difference: if controls for marital status are removed, the conservative fertility advantage gets even bigger. That is, conservatives are simply more likely to be married than liberals. Thus, there is a conservative-liberal gap on marriage and separately on odds of childbearing conditional upon marital status.
But what’s really going on here? Is it that conservatives get married more and have more children? Or is it that getting married and having children makes people conservative? It’s likely that causality flows in both directions. Holding conservative beliefs and attitudes probably makes people more determined to marry and have children earlier, given the significant emphasis conservatives place on the family, children, and marriage. Moreover, some liberals (though certainly not most) have begun to adopt explicitly anti-natal ideologies related to worries about population growth and climate change. Indeed, as shown above, more conservative people report desiring more children in the future, a good indication that conservative attitudes may indeed lead to higher fertility: conservatives who have no kids yet desire more kids than liberals with no kids yet.
However, having children probably also makes people more conservative. Prior academic research has found that after women have children, they tend to subsequently adopt more conservative social attitudes around gender roles, a result present in both British and American datasets.
The key takeaways of this are three-fold: first, Republicans and Democrats, liberals and conservatives, increasingly inhabit different worlds in terms of family life. Republicans tend to live in communities with low rates of childlessness and larger families; Democrats are more likely to live in places where childbearing is rarer and families are smaller. This informs how family policy is approached: Democrats see smaller and fewer families, and so see a cost barrier with which families need help, perhaps because in communities with a lot of Democrats, childbearing is less universal and frequent. On the other hand, Republicans tend to live in places with much higher birth rates and more uniform childbearing, and so tend to think that kids are just a part of life, and people adjust to afford them. Democrats tend to live in places with pricier housing, while Republicans tend to live in places where it’s easier to afford more bedrooms.
Second, the Republican political coalition is heavily weighted towards counties that have a lot of children. In other words, any policy increasing across-the-board transfers to children will tend to provide more financial support to Republicans and more conservative parts of the country, where there are more children. A child allowance, for example, would disproportionately transfer funds from the predominantly Democratic counties that make up 70% of the country’s economic output towards more Republican counties and individuals.
Moreover, the decline in birth rates around the country in recent years may present a challenge for conservative politicians: delayed and reduced transition into marriage and parenthood will result in young adults spending more years with more liberal ideologies. It will be increasingly difficult to build constituencies around conservative social priorities in a world where fewer young adults are at the point in life (married with kids) where those priorities make sense with their life situation.
Finally, this conservative fertility advantage probably will not give conservatives some inevitable long-term political edge.
Fertility rates are falling for conservatives just as much as liberals. Given the size of the fertility differential between conservatives and liberals, it doesn’t actually take a large amount of ideology switching to offset this higher birth rate. Thus, while conservatives may wish that their fertility advantage could afford a durable political majority, that hope is probably just as fleeting as the now-silly-sounding claims of progressives a decade ago that immigration would create a durable Democratic majority.
That’s because, at least right now, conservative parents have not been sufficiently successful in keeping their kids in the fold.
This article has been republished with permission from the Institute for Family Studies. COLUMN BY
https://libertyfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/logo_v6_225x110.png00MercatorNet - Navigating Modern Complexitieshttps://libertyfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/logo_v6_225x110.pngMercatorNet - Navigating Modern Complexities2020-11-30 07:02:052020-11-30 07:02:05Do American Conservatives Have A Fertility Advantage?
CNA Staff (CNA) – The Trump administration has asked the Supreme Court to review a challenge to a California requirement that charitable organizations disclose their major donors to the state attorney general, siding with groups like the Thomas More Law Center that say the requirement will make their donors vulnerable to retaliation, harassment, and violence.
The move from the U.S. Solicitor General’s Office drew praise from John Bursch, senior counsel and vice president of appellate advocacy at the Alliance Defending Freedom legal group.
“Charitable entities shouldn’t be required to disclose confidential donor information to state officials who do not need it and who fail to adequately protect donor identities from disclosure to the public,” Bursch said Nov. 24. “We are pleased that the United States agrees that this case presents critically important issues that the Supreme Court should decide immediately. Forced donor disclosure is a threat to everyone and discourages both charitable giving and participation in the marketplace of ideas.”
Alliance Defending Freedom is backing the Michigan-based Thomas More Law Center’s complaint in the case. The center promotes issues related to religious freedom, moral and family values, and the sanctity of human life, Alliance Defending Freedom said in August 2019. Another challenger to the California rules is the Americans for Prosperity Foundation, which tends to take conservative or libertarian positions on questions of economics and other issues, including opposition to labor unions.
Acting Solicitor General Jeffrey B. Wall filed a brief asking the Supreme Court to grant a hearing on the case, which was victorious in federal district court but suffered a defeat in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
“As this court’s precedents make clear, compelled disclosures that carry a reasonable probability of harassment, reprisals, and similar harms are subject to exacting scrutiny, which requires a form of narrow tailoring,” said the brief to the Supreme Court. The solicitor general’s office said the appeals court ruling “compromises important associational interests protected by the First Amendment.”
“Petitioners alleged that their contributors had in the past suffered harassment, reprisals, and similar harms because of their association with petitioners,” the brief said. Disclosure would likely “expose their substantial contributors to those harms, and thereby deter those contributors and others from making future contributions.”
At issue is a matter of non-profit tax forms and the crucial information they contain.
Qualified tax-exempt organizations already must submit to the IRS a Form 990 federal information form, including the names of “all substantial contributors” in a section called Schedule B. Substantial donors are defined as those who give $5,000 or more to the organization in a year or 2% of total annual contributions. However, the information about these donors must be kept confidential on pain of civil and criminal law.
Non-profits that ask for donations in California must file their tax returns with California’s Registry of Charitable Trusts, administered by the state attorney general, currently Xavier Becerra.
Beginning in 2010, the California attorney general said that disclosures must include this Schedule B. The incoming U.S. vice-president Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., was California attorney general from 2011 to 2017, and the rule change began under her predecessor Jerry Brown.
Both the Thomas More Law Center and the Americans for Prosperity Foundation have alleged that there is a high risk their information will be made public and disrupt their freedom of association.
Alliance Defending Freedom alleged that in March 2012, the California Attorney General’s Office began to “harass the law center and demand the names and addresses of its major donors even though the center’s donors, clients, and employees have faced intimidation, death threats, hate mail, boycotts, and even assassination attempts from ideological opponents.”
The legal group said that for those associated with charities like the Thomas More Law Center that “speak on contentious matters,” the disclosure of donor information “poses an imminent danger of hate mail, violence, ostracization, and boycotts.”
“Only the most stalwart supporters will give money under such a toxic cloud. Most will reasonably conclude that the risk of association is too great, with the result that groups who make the most threats will effectively shut down those with whom they disagree,” said the legal group’s request for Supreme Court review.
“Charities will continue to find as-applied exemptions impossible to achieve, and support for groups advocating contentious ideas will dry up,” the legal group said. “This Court should intervene now while there are still dissenting voices left to save.”
The request said California law has “deprived charities of resources, chilled their speech for nine years, and blocked dissemination of their ideas in our Nation’s most populous state.”
Alliance Defending Freedom has cited the Supreme Court’s 1958 ruling in the case NAACP v. Alabama, which ruled against the Alabama Attorney General’s demands that the civil rights group produce its membership list or cease operations. The restrictions on the group crippled the organization in Alabama at a key time when black Americans sought to secure civil rights.
The NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund filed a friend-of-the-court brief on behalf of the Americans for Prosperity Foundation.
The district court found that California’s required disclosures were not “substantially related” to its interest in regulating charities, as auditors and attorneys seldom use the Schedule B section when they audit or investigate charities. Even when the information was relevant, it could be obtained from other sources. The disclosure requirement was not narrowly tailored.
The district court said petitioners presented “ample evidence” that their contributors had previously suffered “harassment, reprisals, and similar harms” when their involvement became known. The California attorney general’s office had “systematically failed to maintain the confidentiality of Schedule B forms.” This failure included making hundreds of the forms available on its registry website.
The court of appeals, however, overturned the district court. It said confidentiality measures had been tightened and said California had a compelling interest in policing fraud in charitable organizations, and disclosing major donors advances this interest, Reuters reported.
It compared the rule to political disclosure cases such as Doe v. Reed, where the Supreme Court said that the disclosure of the names of people who signed a petition referendum was relevant to state interests in protecting the electoral process.
Alliance Defending Freedom’s summary of the case said, “the California Attorney General’s office has a history of posting supporter’s information online and offers no protection against employees, contractors, or summer interns downloading, e-mailing, or printing supporters’ names and addresses and then disclosing them publicly.”
“We’ve already seen how publicly revealing political donors with the intent of doing harm (or ‘doxing’) can ruin careers and corrode civil discourse,” the legal group said. “Givers would have good reason to fear being doxed—especially in today’s toxic cultural climate.”
The Thomas More Law Center’s president and chief counsel is Richard Thompson, who came to prominence for opposing prominent assisted suicide advocate Jack Kevorkian. Thompson co-founded the law center in in 1998 with Thomas Monaghan, the founder of Domino’s Pizza who continues to be a prominent Catholic philanthropist. Alliance Defending Freedom said about 5% of donors to the law center are California residents.
Besides issues related to religious freedom and family values, the law center’s website also provides resources for critics of the Common Core curriculum. It names other key issues as “confronting the threat of radical Islam” and “defending national security.”
The similarly-named Thomas More Society, based in Illinois, is not connected to the law center.
For its part, Americans for Prosperity was founded in 2004. It has had strong financial support from two wealthy brothers, David and Charles Koch, whose combined net worth is in the billions of dollars.
Originally posted at http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/catholicnewsagency/dailynews/~3/dTnoutIU9_E/
https://libertyfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/logo_v6_225x110.png00Thomas More Law Centerhttps://libertyfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/logo_v6_225x110.pngThomas More Law Center2020-11-30 06:33:102020-11-30 06:33:10Trump Administration Backs Thomas More Law Center in Supreme Court Filing
I conclude that a combination of lost cryptographic key contained on stolen USB memory cards, serious exploitable system and software vulnerabilities and operating system backdoor in DVS, Scytl, SOE Software/eClarity and Smartmatic created the perfect environment to commit widespread fraud in all states where these systems are installed. My analysis of the 2020 Election from NY Times data shows statistical anomalies across the battleground state votes. These failures are widespread and systemic – and sufficient to invalidate the vote counts.
Dr. Keshavarz-Nia concluded:
I conclude with high confidence that the election 2020 data were altered in all battleground states resulting in a hundreds of thousands of votes that were cast for President Trump to be transferred to Vice President Biden. These alterations were the result of systemic and widespread exploitable vulnerabilities in DVS, Scytl/SOE Software and Smartmatic systems that enabled operators to achieve the desired results. In my view, the evidence is overwhelming and incontrovertible.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.S. 1746, I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
https://libertyfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/logo_v6_225x110.png00Dr. Rich Swierhttps://libertyfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/logo_v6_225x110.pngDr. Rich Swier2020-11-29 18:33:172020-11-29 18:33:17Affidavit: DVS, Scytl/SOE Software/eClarity and Smartmatic are vulnerable to data manipulation by unauthorized means
https://libertyfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/logo_v6_225x110.png00Dr. Rich Swierhttps://libertyfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/logo_v6_225x110.pngDr. Rich Swier2020-11-29 18:07:432020-11-29 18:07:43VIDEO EXCLUSIVE: Michael Flynn’s First Interview Since President Trump’s Pardon
The results from eight U.S. House races have still not been finalized in the 2020 elections nearly four weeks after election day. The Republican candidates in all eight races currently are leading their Democrat opponents.
By Ryan Saavedra • Nov 27, 2020 DailyWire.com According to The New York Times, the following eight races have still not been officially called: California’s 21st Congressional District; 98% reported:
Republican David Valadao: 50.5%
Democrat TJ Cox (incumbent): 49.5%
“Republican challenger Valadao of Hanford has a 1,820-vote lead over Fresno Democrat Cox, according to the California Secretary of State,” The Fresno Bee reported. “Fresno County Registrar of Voters Brandi Orth said she expects to be done with the county’s votes and ready to certify them on Friday. An unspecified number of votes that need fixes on their signatures remain to be counted.” California’s 25th Congressional District; 98% reported:
Republican Mike Garcia (incumbent): 50.06%
Democrat Christy Smith: 49.94%
“Republican U.S. Rep. Mike Garcia claimed victory Friday in his back-and-forth contest with Democrat Christy Smith in the 25th District north of Los Angeles, a Southern California battleground that Democrats had captured just two years ago,” The Associated Press reported. “In a statement, Garcia said ‘victory is clear,’ given the votes remaining uncounted. The Associated Press has not declared a winner in the race.”
“A Republican candidate saw her vote lead dwindle to single digits Wednesday in Iowa’s 2nd Congressional District as a dramatic recount moved toward a conclusion in a race that will help determine the size of Democrats’ majority in the House of Representatives,” the Iowa City Press-Citizen reported. “Republican Mariannette Miller-Meeks held a lead of eight votes over Democrat Rita Hart out of more than 394,400 cast, with recount boards in all but one of the district’s 24 counties reporting their results. Miller-Meeks is trying to flip a second congressional seat in Iowa for Republicans this cycle.”
New York’s 1st Congressional District; 77% reported:
Republican Lee Zeldin (incumbent): 61.3%
Democrat Nancy Goroff: 38.7%
No recent media reports. New York’s 2nd Congressional District; 84% reported:
Republican Andrew Garbarino: 56.4%
Democrat Jackie Gordon: 42.6%
“Republican state assemblyman Andrew Garbarino won the U.S. House race in New York’s 2nd Congressional District, keeping the Long Island seat in GOP control,” Bloomberg News reported. “Garbarino beat Democrat and military veteran Jackie Gordon, who conceded the race, according to a statement posted on Twitter. Garbarino will succeed Republican Representative Peter King, who is retiring.” New York’s 11th Congressional District; 85% reported:
Republican Nicole Malliotakis: 57.9%
Democrat Max Rose (incumbent): 42.1%
“Democrat Rep. Max Rose, facing a nearly 16-point deficit as the counting of absentee ballots began this week, on Thursday conceded to Republican Assemblywoman Nicole Malliotakis after a contentious battle for New York’s 11th Congressional District,” Spectrum News reported two weeks ago. “The swing district covers Staten Island and south Brooklyn. It will be the only congressional seat in New York City represented by a Republican.” New York’s 22nd Congressional District; 92% reported:
Republican Claudia Tenney: 50.4%
Democrat Anthony Brindisi (incumbent): 47.4%
“A state judge has ordered a hold on the certification of election results in the tight race for a New York congressional district that stretches from Lake Ontario to the Pennsylvania border,” The Associated Press reported. “A state supreme court judge in Oswego County issued an injunction on Tuesday blocking all the eight counties included in the 22nd Congressional District from certifying results.” New York’s 24th Congressional District; 92% reported:
Republican John Katko (incumbent): 57.4%
Democrat Dana Balter: 38.9%
“The Democrat challenging Republican U.S. Rep. John Katko in a battleground district in central New York conceded the race Friday,” The Associated Press reported 2 weeks ago. “Dana Balter said in a statement that after several days of absentee ballots being counted, it was clear she had no path forward.”
https://libertyfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/logo_v6_225x110.png00Pamela Gellerhttps://libertyfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/logo_v6_225x110.pngPamela Geller2020-11-29 09:12:202020-11-29 09:12:208 U.S. House Races Still Have Not Been Called, Republicans LEAD ALL 8 RACES
