Being Part of an Ever-changing Experiment thumbnail

Being Part of an Ever-changing Experiment

By Save America Foundation



“No one is more hated than he who speaks the truth.”  –
Plato


I have had my suspicions for a long time now that the Big Pharma vax pushers were conducting an exploratory experiment on mankind.

This hypothesis holds there is no single ‘experimental’ vaccine formula, but a never-ending changing witches brew of concoctions, controlled by lot number. This goes way beyond what the emergency use authorization envisioned and makes it an open laboratory experiment of the first order.

That’s why we are seeing such an extreme spectrum of adverse effects from the same provider. The good news for some who have already been vaxed in the guinea pig laboratory is that they are the lucky ones who got the least of the witch’s brew. Big Pharma will not report out what’s in the serum because it’s an ever-changing experiment.

News is now beginning to surface that tends to give weight to the above hypothesis. Listen to Stew Peters and Dr. Jane Ruby reporting on this developing story, below.

Unfortunately, there is more disturbing news as reported out in the second video, below. It is is short hearing testimony by Theresa Long, a military medical doctor, who you no doubt remember as the Lt.Col. military doctor who put together a lenghy affidavit tryingto convince the military to stop injecting the troops.

Watch the expersion of the guy sitting to her right as she describes what she has seen in treating military pilots after they were jabbed. She is no longer permitted to treat these sick pilots.

You have to ask yourself, what in the hell is going on with national security and this Country when the military is party to this maiming and genocide?

©Fred Brownbill. All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Democratic governor turns on Joe Biden over attempt to mandate COVID-19 vaccine: Not ‘correct’

SHOCKING! Vaccine DEATH by LOT NUMBER || Stew Peters & Dr Jane Ruby

Lt. Col. Theresa Long: “In one morning I had to ground 3 out of 3 pilots due to vaccine injuries”

Hispanic voter gives brutally honest reason for supporting Glenn Youngkin: ‘Biden turned me into a Republican’

RELATED TWEET:

“In one morning I had to ground 3 out of 3 pilots due to vaccine injuries”

Lieutenant Colonel Theresa Long, Brigade Surgeon for the 1st Aviation Brigade, Ft. Rucker, Alabama, U.S. Army pic.twitter.com/epFNM0GVP4

— Chief Nerd (@TheChiefNerd) November 2, 2021

US Federal Appeals Court Freezes Biden’s Medically Coercive Vaccine Mandate thumbnail

US Federal Appeals Court Freezes Biden’s Medically Coercive Vaccine Mandate

By Haley Strack

A federal appeals court blocked the Biden administration’s vaccine mandate on Saturday, just two days after the administration issued the law through the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. The rule requires employees at companies with 100 or more workers to get the jab by Jan. 4 or be tested for the virus weekly to avoid getting fired or racking up massive fines.

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a temporary stay, freezing President Joe Biden’s COVID-19 mandate. The court’s decision came in response to a joint petition from entities in Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Utah.

“Yesterday, I sued the Biden Admin over its unlawful OSHA vax mandate,” Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton tweeted on Saturday. “WE WON. Just this morning, citing ‘grave statutory and constitutional issues,’ the 5th Circuit stayed the mandate. The fight is not over and I will never stop resisting this Admin’s unconstitutional overreach!”

“Because the petitions give cause to believe there are grave statutory and constitutional issues with the Mandate, the Mandate is hereby stayed pending further action by this court,” the judges wrote.

The ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit comes after at least two dozen state attorneys general threatened to sue the administration for federal overreach.

“Courts are skeptical because the law demands it,” the attorneys general wrote in a letter to Biden in September. “To justify an emergency temporary standard, OSHA must determine that ‘employees are exposed to grave danger from exposure to substances or agents determined to be toxic or physically harmful or from new hazards…’ and it must conclude that ‘such emergency standard is necessary to protect employees from such danger.’ You cannot plausibly meet the high burden of showing that employees in general are in grave danger.”

Although the Solicitor of Labor Seema Nanda said the Labor Department was “confident in its legal authority” to issue the OSHA-enforced vaccine mandate, Republican-led groups have been questioning and denying its legality since it was implemented on Nov. 4.

“The Occupational Safety and Health Act explicitly gives OSHA the authority to act quickly in an emergency where the agency finds that workers are subjected to a grave danger and a new standard is necessary to protect them,” Nanda said in a statement. “We are fully prepared to defend this standard in court.”

The ruling is the first win against OSHA, but many Republicans are also fighting the mandate in court, including Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis.

“The federal government can’t just unilaterally impose medical policy under the guise of workplace regulation,” DeSantis said on Thursday.

The mandate applies to more than 80 million workers who face coerced compliance or unemployment. An estimated 31.7 million of those workers are unvaccinated and will be forced to choose the jab or their jobs come January. Millions of health care workers participating in Medicare and Medicaid are required to get their shots by January with no option for weekly testing. Private businesses that don’t comply with OSHA’s controversial rule could face a fine of over $130,000.

*****

This article was published on November 6, 2021, and is reproduced with permission from The Federalist.

Gain of Function Controversy Demands Greater Scrutiny for Government-Funded Science thumbnail

Gain of Function Controversy Demands Greater Scrutiny for Government-Funded Science

By Raymond J. March

From his National Geographic documentary to the children’s book about his life, Dr. Anthony Fauci has certainly become a household name during the Covid-19 pandemic. But the reemergence of an alarming controversy has many calling for his arrest.

Moreevidence of the NIH’s involvement in funding “gain of function” research continues to surface, linking financial ties to highly controversial experiments. Gain-of-function research aims to genetically alter microorganisms to enhance certain biological properties. For example, recent gains of function research attempts to increase viruses’ transmissibility.

In this case, a document noting that experiments resulting in mutations of viruses that can easily infect humans required further review by the Department of Health and Human Service to secure further funding. The further we dig, the clearer the link between government funding and gain of function research becomes.

These and other findings strongly contradict Dr. Fauci’s comments made to Senator Rand Paul four months ago, where he denied any NIH involvement in gain of function research. Taking Senator Paul’s interrogation personally, Dr. Fauci scolded the Senator, saying “You do not know what you are talking about” and, “If anyone here is lying, it’s you.”

Now Senator Paul has claimed vindication and called for Dr. Fauci to be fired. While “America’s doctor” has some seeking a second opinion, many questions still remain regarding gain of function research and its connection to the ongoing pandemic.

Did Dr. Fauci knowingly lie about the NIH’s role? What other involvement did the US government have with these projects? Did funding gain of function research lead to the Covid-19 pandemic?

We may never have complete answers to these questions. Regardless, we can learn one clear lesson from this concerning saga: we must reevaluate government involvement in funding scientific research.

In his underappreciated bookThe Organization of Inquiry, economist Gordon Tullock explains how funding scientists can distort the scientific method. When scientists make a discovery, they rely heavily on the review and approval of their scientific peers to verify whether they are correct and how their discovery advances knowledge in other fields or helps benefit the public. Tullock likens this process to “the perfect laissez faire.”

However, when scientists receive research funds from the government, distortions in the process occur. First, scientists are encouraged to pursue research tied to political agendas rather than those encouraged within the scientific community or by private actors in the market. Second, feedback provided by the scientific community on the validity and implications of discovery becomes less important. Consequently, erroneous scientific discoveries stemming from public funding take longer to falsify and to remove from public use.  

Unfortunately, there are plenty of examples to support Tullock’s theory.

In his book Good Calories, Bad Calories, science writer Gary Taubes reviews decades of scientific research, casting doubt that a high carbohydrate and low fat diet can prevent heart disease. Noting a large consensus that high-carb diets do not deter heart disease, and often lead to other serious health concerns, Taubes argues that the reason this dietary advice persists is because government funding bolsters this hypothesis, even as evidence against it proliferates.

From 1936 until 1972, over 50,000 Americans were lobotomized, many against their wishes and some for non-medical reasons. Even with the American Medical Association denouncing the procedure in 1941 (after about 30 were performed), public mental asylums continued to regularly use it.

As I argue in my paper published in Research Policy, much of the lobotomy’s overuse and prolonged popularity can be explained by incentives. Many state and federal asylums received federal funding to perform lobotomies, which also allowed asylum managers to increase the number of committed patients (which also increased their funding). Financial incentives overshadowed scientific consensus that the procedure was ineffective and harmful.

Not every failure of government-funded science is as pervasive as the high-carb diet, as ghastly as the lobotomy, or as controversial as gain of function experiments. But the risk remains as long as the government remains a major funding source for research.

As of 2013, government funding composed nearly half of basic scientific research – weakening or divorcing a considerable amount of scientific work from the scrutiny of its peers. The result is an overinvestment in haphazard and potentially harmful scientific work. And these results seem very replicable.

*****

This article was published on November 2, 2021, and is reproduced with permission from AIER, American Institute for Economic Research.

COVID: The Greatest Weapon Against Freedom thumbnail

COVID: The Greatest Weapon Against Freedom

By Rod Eccles

Since about March of 2020, the world has been enthralled and rolled over the Sars CoV-2 virus otherwise known as COVID-19. We, the public, the citizenry of the world including here in the USA wondered how this could have happened and where this virus came from.

Early on we heard rumors that it started in a biomedical laboratory in Wuhan, China. But true to leftists media form, the rumor was thought to be that of conspiracy nut jobs. We also heard rumors that the virus first appeared as far back as August or September of 2019.

Again the media said this was the nut job scenario and could not be taken seriously. After all, this was all happening on then President Trump’s watch and we all know that the left said he had to go by any means necessary. By the way, nobody on the left disputes this.

So we were told the infections started in China in the beginning of December 2019. President Trump jumped on this issue as soon as he could get real information. He began to limit travel to and from China. The left through a fit.

Remember House of Representatives Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi going to a “China Town” and decrying loudly that everyone should hug Asians? She did do that and it was all over the news. Thus Trump was a racist for sure.

Then the virus began its stampeded across the USA. We saw American cases begin to rise in January 2020. Then President Trump restricted travel to and from China to nearly zero and again the left screamed racism.

Then came March 2020 and the world stopped. It just stopped. Here in the USA we went into an unprecedented “lock down” where only “essential” workers were allowed to go to work. Businesses big and small were shuttered. Employees that could not work from home were laid off. Unemployment skyrocketed into the double digits.

We were told, just 15 days to flatten the curve so our hospitals and medical workers would not be overwhelmed by COVID-19 cases. But over those two weeks, the number of cases kept rising as did the death toll. (However, that death toll is in serious question for reasons I will not go into with this article)

As the numbers kept increasing, even though nearly 100% of small and medium businesses were closed, a new approach came down from high. MASKS. They would save us all. Mask mandates popped up almost everywhere as governments all across the USA from the Federal level down to the local municipal level touted the effectiveness of masks. Masks of any kind including simple cloth masks many folks made at home.

But this edict came after one of the top government Medical Professionals in the nation, Dr. Anthony Fauci, said these sorts of masks were silly and ineffective. By the way, Dr. Fauci not only did a 180 degree turn, he still wants masks to be mandated for everyone just about everywhere especially for children in school.

There is a problem with masks however. The United States Government says these kinds of mask (sans COVID-19) are not effective against viral or many biological diseases, especially those that are airborne. Various governmental agencies agree how ineffective they are.

Not to mention we now have numerous studies that show just how ineffective these masks are. And to further drive the point home, most manufacturers of these masks overtly state that their masks are not intended to prevent viral infection or prevent viral spread.

And lets not forget the Social Distancing requirements. That was one of the biggest uses of fear mongering our government has used through this entire pandemic. But the truth is that 6 feet is not enough. In fact, WebMD has a report on a study that says in order to truly be effective, Social Distancing should be at least 26 feet. More than 4 times the distance touted as being protective in social settings.

But social distancing along with wearing a mask and closing all but “essential” businesses was intended to flatten the curve. Another bad idea. Johns Hopkins actually has an article that shows what flattening the curve does. The only conclusion after reviewing this study is that flattening the curve does relieve the immediate stress on our health care system. For the short term. The reality is that it extends the pandemic by months or even years thus actually causing MORE death and debilitation.

So why did our government, under now President Joe Biden, double down on something that doesn’t work? Answer is simple. POWER and CONTROL.

Even as everyone wore a mask anytime they went anywhere outside of their home (some communities even mandated via arrest and/or fine that you wear the mask anytime you were off your own property including OUTSIDE.)

Even parks and beaches were closed yet the spread did not stop. Probably because everyone was herded into large box stores to make essential purchases.

Lets rewind or should I say “circle back” for a moment. President Trump saw how devastating this virus seemed to be so he initiated something called Warp Speed in order to find a vaccine. This meant that drug manufacturers could speed up the research and development of said vaccine.

Seeing a big fat payday, these pharmaceutical companies went to work. And in a matter of months they had vaccines ready for human trials. Then these trials were fast tracked. This means there was not extensive testing at any level to detect or find any side effects of these new drugs. There was no time to see how effective these new vaccines would be in the short and long term. Even though we were told they would be up to 96% effective.

BUT, hold on. We were not saved. You see, during the presidential campaign of 2020, then candidate Joe Biden said he wouldn’t trust a vaccine created under President Trump. Many Democrat candidates of all levels echoed those sentiments.

November of 2020 the elections came and Biden won the Presidency. Democrats won control, basically, of the Senate and kept their stranglehold on the House. As Biden came into office in January of 2021, their tone on the vaccines changed. Almost overnight.

At first they strongly recommended that people get the vaccines. They even had “shows” of various Democrat leaders getting the “jab”. We are told it was one of the three current vaccines in use in the USA.

When some in the media suggested that there should be a mandate, the Biden Administration and even Nancy Pelosi said they could not do it because it would be unconstitutional.

Unconstitutional until they figured out a way to ignore the constitution and begin federal mandates and push and connive and coerce local and state governments and business to do so in the Feds stead.

But wait. There is a problem with the vaccines. A growing number of people are developing serious side effects after taking the drugs. Not to mention we have learned that they do not perform as promised and their efficacy has plummeted to below 50%. Fully vaccinated folks are getting COVID-19 and some are even dying. But the mandates persist.

A number of studies show that the COVID-19 vaccines indeed to not work as promised. They do indeed produce some serious side effects including liver problems, high blood pressure and other serious maladies. And a number of studies show that these vaccines do not seem to protect as well as natural immunity. In other words, people who have had COVID and recovered have a better built immunity against repeat infection than those who get the vaccines.

In the United Kingdom, there was and is an outbreak of COVID cases among the fully vaccinated. In fact the number of people hospitalized for COVID there who are fully vaccinated, exceeded 76%. The number of people dying there due to COVID, well according the the Brits, 80% of the deaths were of those who were fully vaccinated. I guess that throws out a LOT of the reasons they are using in the USA to get the “jab.”

I wont even get into the issue of wanting to force these vaccines upon your children. The thought of kids getting these things frightens me to no end. Let me just say that there are major studies that show that kids between 12 and 17, especially boys, are at increased risk of myocarditis. Not something to take lightly.

And yet our governments seem bent on making sure each of us bend to their will. How? By actually telling you that if you don’t get the vaccine you will lose your job, not be able to attend popular events, eat out at a restaurant or even shop in person for groceries. In other words, Biden and the Democrats will crush your basic rights as outlined and protected by the Constitution.

In short, the left wants to mandate things that don’t work and wont keep you safe and in some cases may even kill you if you don’t bend to their will. I wont bend. I wont willingly take any current COVID-19 vaccine. Indeed at least 70 million other Americans refuse as well. The government and business does not have the right to force anyone. That is nothing more than authoritarianism and communism.

That’s not America to me. Is that America to you?

©Rod Eccles. All rights reserved.

RELATED TWEET:

Whistleblower Says Pfizer Vaccine Trial Included ‘FALSIFIED DATA’ https://t.co/RLH2lTpoHX pic.twitter.com/BkdhQfYynn

— Atlas Shrugs (@atlasshrugs) November 4, 2021

DOCTOR: Public Lacks Access to Information on Vaxx Risks thumbnail

DOCTOR: Public Lacks Access to Information on Vaxx Risks

By Church Militant

Dr. Malone, one of the costs of singing outside the chorus is the risk of being negatively reviewed by the critics — if not by the prime donne. And you were in fact deplatformed from LinkedIn for example. What was that like?

Dr. Malone: That’s an interesting story. They did do that, and then they looked at the actual statements that I’d made.

The vice president of LinkedIn wrote me an apology letter and reinstated me, and explicitly said that LinkedIn didn’t have the skill set to censor me — to evaluate my statements and the nuances in my statements.

It’s odd that nonscientists should sit as a court, I mean to do the full judge, jury and prosecution over actual scientists — weighing the acceptability of dissenting scientists’ non-orthodoxy from whichever infallibly declared dogma.

Dr. Malone: I think this is a great credit to LinkedIn — as opposed to Facebook and many of the other platforms — that they would acknowledge that in fact, they don’t have physician-scientists with 12 years of postdoctoral training making these decisions.

Were there any consequences for your co-conspirators in the now-famous podcast with Dr. Bret Weinstein and Steve Kirsch that catapulted you to worldwide attention?

Dr. Malone: In our case, Steve [the inventor of the laser mouse for computing] was risking his position and his status — and in fact his company. His board of directors subsequently insisted that he step down as CEO of the company that he created because of “fact-checker” statements made about him.

The podcast that catapulted the speakers to worldwide attention

I myself was risking any theoretical possibility of being considered by the Nobel committee, and I have no idea what’s going to take place.

We all went into that podcast knowing we were risking something significant and that the moral obligation to disclose what we knew — and to speak freely and frankly — outweighed any personal risk.

We were very, very conscious of that. We were all nervous as cats on a hot tin roof as we went into that discussion. It’s part of the tension that exists among the three of us that people find so fascinating.

You told Tucker Carlson the public doesn’t have enough information to decide whether to get vaccinated. Who should make the choice, in principle, when it comes to vaccination — the individual or the government? What reflections do you have on the interplay between personal autonomy/responsibility and public safety?

Dr. Malone: So, as a physician, I believe strongly in the fundamentals that we’ve all agreed on since World War II in terms of bioethics, which is that the individual has autonomy and has the right to accept or reject medical procedures that would be performed on them.

I believe that it’s the role of the government to inform the public — not to require of the public.

In order to persuade the public, the government has to have some trust and it has to have clear disclosure of risks.

You said the individual has the right to decide what happens to their body, but you did say to Tucker Carlson that the public doesn’t have enough information to make the decision. I have to drill down on this — isn’t there a tension there between those two points?

Dr. Malone: So, if the tension exists, in my mind, what I was expressing to Tucker was that there has not been full disclosure of the range of risks that exist. What I’m expressing is that the public is not able to gain access to a full spectrum of information that’s known about the risks of the vaccine. That information is carefully controlled — and, many argue, has been managed in such a way to minimize any potential perception of risk, rather than taking a stance of open disclosure. So the public has to be fully aware of all the information.

In the case of what I was expressing to Tucker particularly, specifically, is that in the United States the Food & Drug Administration has believed, has intended, based on last fall’s communications, that they had a set of data-capture tools that would allow them to accurately assess risk associated with the vaccine. And what I shared with Tucker was that my colleagues in the FDA and myself and many others were well aware that those data-gathering tools the FDA had hoped would be sufficient were not sufficient.

Now we know — with the letter with which the FDA granted marketing authorization for the BioNTech commodity product — that the FDA explicitly states their data collection capabilities were not sufficient to assess and that there were adverse events associated with this vaccine.

News Report: Fully Vaccinated DieSo what I had said to Tucker back then that was considered heretical at the time was that we didn’t have the capabilities to assess rare risks of the vaccines, in part because the FDA had not required the vaccine manufacturers to do the rigorous studies and had relied on this passive information-gathering system. We did not have the capabilities to gather the necessary data to make a full and rigorous assessment of risk. And therefore, it was not possible to inform the public even if the FDA fully wished to.What’s changed between what I said then — which was considered heresy — and now, is that the FDA has freely acknowledged in their public writing that I was correct. They do not have these tools, and that’s why we find ourselves in the States looking to Israel and the United Kingdom, in particular, for their data.

So, we’re in an odd situation in the States where there’s acknowledgment that our data systems are inadequate to assess the risks of the vaccine and that therefore the public is not able to be fully aware of those risks. We seek to rely on the Israeli and U.K. data but, to my eye, when it’s inconvenient, we say, “Well, we don’t have the data here in the States.” We play a game where we say there may be risks and issues that have been identified in the United Kingdom — for instance, the infection of the vaccinated — but we haven’t actually seen that data yet here in the States, and so we’re denying that it’s a real problem, even though we also simultaneously acknowledge that we actually haven’t set up the systems that would allow us to detect them.

Your argument to Tucker wasn’t therefore that people aren’t capable, in principle, of deciding?

Dr. Malone: Not at all. It’s the data. It’s that the information is not available. It’s not being made available, and it’s not being captured — because we have a failure to set up adequate systems.

Admiral Rachel Levine, Assistant Secretary for Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, said, “We strongly encourage everyone age 12 and older who are eligible to receive the vaccine under Emergency Use Authorization to get vaccinated, as the benefits of vaccination far outweigh any harm.” When I was looking at that statement, “far outweigh any harm,” I thought of the Hippocratic Oath, which is “First, do no harm.” Is there a tension, do you think, between those two principles?

Dr. Malone: How can you deny that there’s a tension between those two principles?

Dr. Levine is an eminent public health official, and I respect her many contributions to public health. However, I disagree with her evaluation in this case. I strongly disagree that the benefits greatly outweigh the risks.

I believe the sum-total of the risks include the development of viral escape mutants and, as well as the potential harm to the individual, which I believe even she would need to acknowledge, that certainly the data demonstrate — and the FDA’s own statements demonstrate — that we do not fully understand the risks.

So to say the benefits outweigh the risks when we don’t completely understand the risks seems to be, in my mind, a logical non sequitur. It’s inconsistent with the data as I understand it.

COLUMN BY

Benjamin Harnwell

Benjamin Harnwell is a cofounder and member of the board of directors of Patriot Party Italia, the first political party in the world explicitly inspired by the thought and philosophy of Stephen K. Bannon. He’s also international editor of Bannon’s No. 1 podcast WarRoom. Follow him on Twitter @ben_harnwell.

EDITORS NOTE: This Church Militant video and column are republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Stunning New Study Undercuts the Case for Vaccine Mandates thumbnail

Stunning New Study Undercuts the Case for Vaccine Mandates

By Foundation for Economic Education (FEE)

The study does stress that vaccination has a clear personal health benefit, drastically reducing the chance of serious illness or death once infected with COVID-19.


With President Biden’s federal vaccine mandate and local government employment mandates looming, the future of countless workers is up in the air. Yet new research undercuts the stated justification for these mandates.

Big-government politicians claim that vaccine mandates are necessary because unvaccinated individuals are a danger to not just themselves but society. They argue that choosing to remain unvaccinated exacerbates the spread of the deadly virus. But according to a new study published in the Lancet, this doesn’t appear to be true.

Vaccinated people are just as likely as unvaccinated people to spread the delta variant to contacts in their household, a yearlong study found https://t.co/2Px9LM5WcB

— Bloomberg (@business) October 28, 2021

“People inoculated against Covid-19 are just as likely to spread the delta variant of the virus to contacts in their household as those who haven’t had shots, according to new research,” Bloomberg reports. “In a yearlong study of 621 people in the U.K. with mild Covid-19, scientists found that their peak viral load was similar regardless of vaccination status, according to a paper published Thursday in The Lancet Infectious Diseases medical journal.”

“The analysis also found that 25% of vaccinated household contacts still contracted the disease from an index case, while 38% of those who hadn’t had shots became infected,” the report continues. “The results go some way toward explaining why the delta variant is so infectious even in nations with successful vaccine rollouts, and why the unvaccinated can’t assume they are protected because others have had shots.”

The study does stress that vaccination has a clear personal health benefit, drastically reducing the chance of serious illness or death once infected with COVID-19.

“Those who were inoculated cleared the virus more quickly and had milder cases, while unvaccinated household members were more likely to suffer from severe disease and hospitalization,” Bloomberg summarizes. Yet the protection did not extend to the elimination of transmission.

“Our findings show that vaccination alone is not enough to prevent people from being infected with the delta variant and spreading it in household settings,” study co-author Ajit Lalvani said.

We should be clear about the uncertainty in this conversation. We don’t truly know how much, if at all, the vaccines reduce transmission of the disease; different research has found different results for different variants and different vaccines. Yet this uncertainty itself renders much of the stated interpersonal benefit from vaccine mandates purely speculative.

The vaccines do appear to highly reduce the chance of hospitalization or death from COVID-19. That’s why I chose to take the COVID vaccine and have encouraged several people in my life who are at risk of COVID to do so. But the fact remains that the main benefit of COVID vaccination is personal, not societal.

This is why Stanford epidemiologist Jay Bhattacharya calls the development of these vaccines “a wonderful achievement” that has “protected so many people from severe outcomes of the disease,” but ultimately concludes that vaccination is a matter of personal health—not public health.

Bhattacharya and experts like him are right. As evidenced by “breakthrough cases” and research like this new study, COVID vaccines clearly do not prevent transmission of the virus. The main benefits are for individuals themselves. Proponents of big government mandates have no compelling case for overriding individual choice on fundamental questions of bodily autonomy.

WATCH: New Biden Vax Mandate Doesn’t Make ANY Sense (Here’s Why)

COLUMN BY

Brad Polumbo

Brad Polumbo (@Brad_Polumbo) is a libertarian-conservative journalist and Policy Correspondent at the Foundation for Economic Education.

EDITORS NOTE: This FEE column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved. Like this story? Click here to sign up for the FEE Daily and get free-market news and analysis like this from Policy Correspondent Brad Polumbo in your inbox every weekday.

VIDEO: Doctors Wish That The Unvaxxed Die! thumbnail

VIDEO: Doctors Wish That The Unvaxxed Die!

By John Eidson

“I will not give a lethal drug to anyone if I am asked, nor will I advise such a plan; and similarly I will not give a woman a pessary to cause an abortion.”Hippocratic Oath


The Democratic Party has done a masterful job of indoctrinating its followers to have unbridled hatred for anyone who opposes its policies. In the video below, an unvaccinated nurse talks about doctors and other educated healthcare professionals who wish death on people who choose to not get vaccinated.

The odds are off the charts that virtually all of those medical profession death-wishers vote Democrat.

Watch:

Unvaccinated nurse speaks out.

Stirring and emotional words.pic.twitter.com/ASsIcA4r47

— Citizen Free Press (@CitizenFreePres) October 29, 2021

RELATED VIDEO: Sen. Rand Paul: Vaccinated people in Israel are seven times more likely to get Covid as people who were infected naturally.

Hippocratic Oath

I swear by Apollo the physician, and Asclepius, and Hygieia and Panacea and all the gods and goddesses as my witnesses, that, according to my ability and judgement, I will keep this Oath and this contract:

To hold him who taught me this art equally dear to me as my parents, to be a partner in life with him, and to fulfill his needs when required; to look upon his offspring as equals to my own siblings, and to teach them this art, if they shall wish to learn it, without fee or contract; and that by the set rules, lectures, and every other mode of instruction, I will impart a knowledge of the art to my own sons, and those of my teachers, and to students bound by this contract and having sworn this Oath to the law of medicine, but to no others.

I will use those dietary regimens which will benefit my patients according to my greatest ability and judgement, and I will do no harm or injustice to them.

I will not give a lethal drug to anyone if I am asked, nor will I advise such a plan; and similarly I will not give a woman a pessary to cause an abortion.

In purity and according to divine law will I carry out my life and my art.

I will not use the knife, even upon those suffering from stones, but I will leave this to those who are trained in this craft.

Into whatever homes I go, I will enter them for the benefit of the sick, avoiding any voluntary act of impropriety or corruption, including the seduction of women or men, whether they are free men or slaves.

Whatever I see or hear in the lives of my patients, whether in connection with my professional practice or not, which ought not to be spoken of outside, I will keep secret, as considering all such things to be private.

So long as I maintain this Oath faithfully and without corruption, may it be granted to me to partake of life fully and the practice of my art, gaining the respect of all men for all time. However, should I transgress this Oath and violate it, may the opposite be my fate.

Translated by Michael North, National Library of Medicine, 2002.

©John Edison. All rights reserved.

BLM and MAGA form Extraordinary Backlash against Democrats thumbnail

BLM and MAGA form Extraordinary Backlash against Democrats

By Rod Thomson

On a recent weekend in New York City, thousands of protesters gathered in Times Square. But the number of protesters wasn’t the headline. Rather it was the diversity of the crowd that was surprising. One sign indicative of the mood read, “Dear Democratic Party, you lost me at mandate. Sincerely, a lifelong liberal.”

It appears that the American people may have, finally, had enough. Indeed, we may be witnessing the beginning of the end of the Democrat Party. All without one Conservative even firing a single shot.

Mixed into the masses were MAGA folks like John Tabacco, New York City Conservative Activist and host of the Newsmax show “Wiseguys”. He’s convinced that “New Yorkers are finally coming together on this issue. Biden and the government overplayed their hand with these draconian vaccine mandates and as a result people are uniting on the right and left. This is the government’s worst nightmare.” Could it be true?

Marching alongside residents like Tabacco were equally incensed New Yorkers like Reverend Kevin McCall, a Black Lives Matter activist. Where MAGA rally-goers generally remain lawful and peaceful, unlike what mainstream media likes to portray, BLM protesters have no such parameters.

McCall “made it clear to the crowd that sometimes civil disobedience is the only way to get the government to listen.” Consistent with the group’s historic ideologies, the Reverend said “[t]he revolution will not be televised. The revolution is going to be in the streets. Yeah we can rally, yeah we can say ‘no justice no peace’, yeah we can scream ‘my body, my choice’ but the only thing that they respect is when we shut stuff down!”

Now we’re talking!

I’ve preached for years the necessity of using Saul Alinsky tactics in order to win the war against the left’s march towards communism. One of his most successful early strategies was to threaten boycotts of big corporations like Macy’s in New York City to force compliance with his bullying tactics in order to change policy. He never needed to actually shut down most of the companies. He merely used his Tactic #9: The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself. If shareholders caught wind of Alinsky’s plans, it was enough to give protesters what they wanted. Conservatives have been cowering by the left’s threats alone ever since. Such wimps we are.

Now it appears Conservatives won’t have to do the heavy lifting, shameful as that may be. When all is said and done, it could all boil down to the age-old mantra, “the enemy of my enemy is my friend.”

Since last summer when I helped organize marches in my own downtown city, I’ve known that we somehow must unite people with varying goals if we want to slay the real dragon — the left. I held rallies with titles like “Black and White Unite for Blue” against defunding the police, for example. Only together, I preached, could Americans beat back the tyrannical stranglehold of the Marxists’ transformation of our country. But few listened back then.

That MAGA and BLM would later unite in a desperate sign of unity to save our country from the encroaching enslavement now becoming more visible to all is a dream come true. Timing is everything.

If ever there was a poster “boy” responsible for the chaos the COVID mandates have wrought, it’s Rachel Levine. He has just been promoted as the first female four-star officer ever in the armed forces of the United States of America. Who knew breaking the glass ceiling was as simple as a sex-change? 

The openly transgender health official may best be remembered as Pennsylvania’s Secretary of Health who, at the height of the CCP-virus pandemic across America, forced infected patients to return to nursing homes after moving his own 95-year-old mother to safety. That hypocrisy is the root of the anger coming back to haunt the Dems.

According to The Gateway Pundit (TGP), at the swearing-in ceremony in an unabashedly candid display of hubris, Levine stated, “I stand on the shoulders of those LGBTQ plus individuals who came before me, both those known and unknown. May this appointment today be the first of many more to come as we create a diverse and more inclusive future.” Ugh.

It’s that kind of gross government blasphemy that has awakened otherwise complacent MAGA folks and the still-rational Democrats, including the less radical members of BLM. People are saying, enough is enough.

The even greater news is that this symbiotic unification isn’t only happening here in America. Uprisings are taking place worldwide.

Local organizers responsible for the NYC march have been coordinating with the World Wide Rally For Freedom. These are “ongoing bimonthly events planned all over the USA as well as in over 400 locations including Argentina, Australia, Canada, Denmark, England, France, Germany, Israel, Lebanon, New Zealand, Scotland, Switzerland, Uruguay”, according to TGP.

The World Wide Demonstration (also known as the World Wide Rally For Freedom) website, “is an internationally syndicated community demonstration dedicated to emboldening citizens to push back against Coronavirus related restrictions in their countries. The event is deployed by member organizations in each city, with full local autonomy at the grass roots level.”

As whole city populations around the globe are rising up as one against the tyrannical mandates, so too are segmented groups of workers in varied occupations.

In Chicago, a third of the police force refused to comply with vaccine reporting requirements. While Mayor Lori Lightfoot is infamous for her “defund the police” policies, she is now accusing the officers of “fomenting an ‘insurrection’”. Dare she risk losing 30 percent of her city’s protective force? We know Democrats are insane of late. But, are they that suicidal? Apparently so.

Now police officers who’ve opted to retire rather than be vaccinated are at risk of losing their pensions under even more draconian measures. While the Fraternal Order of Police are telling their members to “hold the line,” nothing could unify Americans from all sides against Dems better than injustices like this.

Democrat Governor Terry McAuliffe’s race in Virginia also encapsulates the division created by the Party’s rapidly degrading overreach. Exposing the entrenched tyrannical attitude so many Dems have adopted over the last decade, the once popular Governor may have just lost the gubernatorial race with one simple gaffe.

Proving his insensitivity towards a parents’ rights to their own kids’ education given the explosive Critical Race Theory topic prevalent today, McAuliffe said he didn’t “think parents should be telling schools what they should teach.” The backlash has been immediate and diverse.

Could it be that Americans are finally waking up to our alarming loss of rights? Only time will tell. But, one thing is for certain: none of us can sit this one out, no matter what side of the fence we sit.

Is there risk in getting involved? You betchya. We are fighting pure evil. Recently a Patriot who joined a rally I organized was contacted by the FBI, most likely for their participation. Scary as it sounds, we must understand this is a long battle for the very survival of our country. To the left, this is war and they aim to win by any means necessary. We must be equally determined.

For far too long we’ve focused on fighting each other. That’s been by the left’s design. If we’re lucky, those days are numbered. In uniting we can at least have hope for freedom and justice for all once again.

Join the movement. Go to World Wide Demonstrations here and become part of history while we still have a chance.

Cathi Chamberlain, aka The Deplorable Author and founder of The Deplorable Report, is a four-time start-up business owner, published author of a self-help book featured on CNN worldwide and owner of the nation’s first all-female construction company. She is a sought-after political speaker and has been a regular contributor on the Salem Media Radio Network. In her book, “Rules for Deplorables: A Primer for Fighting Radical Socialism,” Cathi heavily references Saul Alinsky’s 1970’s blockbuster book, “Rules for Radicals.” She is currently on her “Florida Deplorable Book Tour.” Contact her for your next speaking event at Cathi@RulesforDeplorablesBook.com.

EDITORS NOTE: This The Revolutionary Act column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved. Like us on Instagram

AWED Newsletter: We cover everything from COVID to Climate, as well as Energy to Elections. thumbnail

AWED Newsletter: We cover everything from COVID to Climate, as well as Energy to Elections.

By John Droz, Jr.



Welcome! We cover COVID to Climate, as well as Energy to Elections.

Note 1: Each issue now has a link, so it’s simple to share on social media. We’re also hoping that the new Newsletter format makes it easier to read.

Note 2: Please see the major new website (C19Science.info) with dozens of quality COVID-19 reports.


— This Newsletter’s Articles, by Topic —


COVID-19 — Repeated Important Information:

New website (C19Science.info) with dozens of quality COVID-19 reports.

COVID-19 — Therapies:

The FDA’s War Against the Truth on Ivermectin

Indonesia cut Covid by 98% with Ivermectin while Australia grew cases 500% with vax

Merck sees up to $7 billion in sales of Covid-19 drug in one year

Study: Nutraceutical Approach to Preventing COVID-19 and Related Complications

Low‐dose radiation therapy (LDRT) for COVID‐19 and its deadlier variants

COVID-19 — Vaccines:

CDC’s Interesting Definition of a Vaccine

A site collecting data for adverse vaccine reactions: React-19

Dr. Campbell: Professional athlete’s vaccine experience

DC Rally on Nov 2: Real Not Rare

Gov’t Reports Suggests Vaccinated Are Having Immune System Decline

Study: Long-term COVID-19 side effects may include memory loss, etc.

John Hopkins: Immunocompromised People — Fully Vaccinated and Not Protected

Short video: Federal Agencies not keeping adverse COVID-19 records

Official reports suggest vaccinated are developing Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

Harvard Study: CNS Inflammation Post Vaccination

Former CDC Director Gives Alarming Statistic on Fully Vaccinated COVID Deaths

Reminiscent of Nazi Germany: The Disturbing Truth Behind the Vax

MD: I Will Not Be Taking the Current COVID-19 Vaccines

Fully Vaccinated Colin Powell Dies of COVID-19

In England: fully vaccinated accounted for 82% of Covid-19 deaths & 66% of hospitalizations during the past month

COVID-19 — Vaccine Mandates:

Navy to begin kicking sailors out who refuse COVID vaccine

The push for “vaccinating” kids relies on deception and ignorance

White House Details Plan To “Quickly” Vaccinate 28 Million Children Age 5-11

Vaccine Tyranny Ignites Brushfires of Freedom

Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against Vaccine Mandates

Santa Claus Fired Over Vaccine Mandate By Major Retailer

San Francisco shuts down food business for not enforcing vaccine mandate

185 Employees Leave Los Alamos Nuclear Weapons Lab Due to Vaccine Mandate

The Immorality of Hospital-Forced Healthcare Worker Vaccine Mandates

MD: Tyrannical COVID agenda violates every law of the land

The EU Parliament Opposes Vaccine Mandate Agenda

CDC director says schools should have mask mandates even if FDA approves jab for kids

COVID-19 — Models and Data:

Study: Children born during pandemic have lower IQs

Viral Shedding: All You Need To Know About This COVID-19 Transmission

Waterford has 97+% vaccination rate — but State’s highest rate of Covid-19 infections

COVID-19 — Misc:

We Are in This Conflict Whether We Like It or Not

Covid Authoritarians Are The Cause Of America’s Problems, Not The Unvaccinated

COVID, lockdown and the retreat of scientific debate

Short video: Healing the Divide

Dr. Fauci: The Highest Paid Employee In The Entire U.S. Federal Government

Lies, Corruption and Hypocrisy: The Fauci Saga Continues

Chinese Defector Reveals COVID-19 Origin

Absolute Corruption: The Three Big Pharma Companies with COVID EUA Vaccines, All Employ Former FDA Commissioners

Greed Energy Economics:

Congress eyes $235B in clean energy subsidies. Here they are

The Real Cost of Government Mandated Wind and Solar

New data on real offshore wind costs

Why Carbon Hysteria And Decarbonization Policies Are Economically Insane

Wait, who agrees NC electricity costs must keep going up? Not consumers

New Book: Green Murder

Study: Electric Cars Cost More To Refuel Than Gasoline Powered Cars

Solar And Wind Are Forcing Poverty On Africa

Renewable Energy Health and Ecosystem Consequences:

Tucker exposes the hidden impact of green energy

Wind Noise: A Continuing Issue (night amplification)

The Dirty Little Secret: Wind Turbines Create Health Issues

EPA’s Commitments to Action on PFAS

Wind Energy:

Wind Turbine Failures Behind Europe’s Energy Crisis are a Warning for America

No Christmas for wind project operator or neighbors

Icebreaker wind project proposed for Lake Erie needs to find more financing soon

Plug-in cars are the future. The grid isn’t ready.

Solar Energy:

EPA Plans New Rules for “Forever Chemicals” (found in some solar panels)

NY’s CLCPA: Yet Another Industrial Solar Issue

Unintended Consequences of Solar Development Threaten Agriculture

Nuclear Energy:

Renewables are 5 times the cost of nuclear

IAEA, Poland Say Nuclear Energy Needed to Hit Climate Goals

Why The Pro-Nuclear Movement Is Winning

Sodium-cooled fast reactors and the future of nuclear energy

Fossil Fuel Energy:

The true feasibility of moving away from fossil fuels

Nature calls but the world is not listening

Fossil fuels form the basis of our medical and food supply chains

A toolkit to make existing Coal plants more efficient

Our Medical Industry and Food Supply Depend on Fossil Fuels

U.S. Coal Industry Says Almost Sold-Out For 2022

Misc Energy:

The Dangerous Intersection of Energy, Politics and Shipping

Supreme Court to hear challenge to EPA climate change rules for power plants

Red China Tried To Go Green, Now It’s Going Dark

Will the Energy Crisis Be ESG’s Great Reset?

Global Energy Crisis Is the First of Many in the Clean-Power Era

Report: Energy Rationing is on the Horizon

Democrats’ Energy Agenda Puts Foreign Approval Ahead of American Families

Energy professionals: do you understand how the media works?

NYS Prop 2: A Dangerously Seductive Idea

Staggering $1.5 billion lithium deposit discovered in Maine

Maine Energy Facts

Manmade Global Warming — Some Deceptions:

Director of Berkeley Atmospheric Sciences Center, quits due to politics

Report: The underestimated role of clouds in global warming

Mankind’s Danger is Not Climate, but Policy that Uses Climate to Destroy Us

COP26 & The Great Reset: The Not So Glorious Prospect of Owning Nothing

A Flood Of Superficial Climate Reports

CLINTEL: Critique of the AR6 WG1 Summary for Policymakers

CLINTEL catalogs IPCC errors in time for UN COP 26

Don’t be fooled by claims of consensus, science is not a popularity contest

Big Tech is censoring the climate change debate

Manmade Global Warming — Misc:

CO2 Coalition unveils new website: co2coalition.org

The collapse of our values is a greater threat than climate change

G20 Rome summit deeply divided over COP26 agenda

Dr. Lindzen: China Warming

Laughing at climate hysteria

First Get the Science Right

Short Video: Is There Really a Climate Emergency?

Experts: Biden’s Climate Financing Plan Won’t Help Climate, But Will Push Country To Totalitarianism

US Election:

Election-Integrity.info (10 major election reports by our team of experts, plus much more!)

Get Smart About What Really Happened in the 2020 Election

Democrats’ Re-Branded Takeover of State Elections Should be Unanimously Rejected

Statement on Senate Vote Defeating S. 2747

‘No Widespread Support’ for Democrats’ Anti-Voter Agenda

Restoring voter confidence: what suppression?

US Election — Virginia:

An army of GOP’s ‘election integrity’ poll watchers — turns out across Virginia

Lawsuit: Virginia county is violating election law amid governor race

How Virginia Democrats Are Working To Make Elections Sloppy Again

US Election — Other State Issues:

AZ State Senate Hearings of Partial Forensic Audit of 2020 Election

Maricopa Audit found ‘Thousands of Duplicate Ballots’

Scorched Earth Judging in North Carolina

Connecticut: Director of Elections or Partisan Operative?

Two Ballot issues to be voted on by NY citizens

What are NYS Five Ballot Propositions All About?

Huge Setback As Judge Shuts Down Attempts To Examine Georgia Ballots

WI Sheriff Investigation – Election Law Not Just Broken, but Shattered

US Politics and Socialism:

As the Left Tries to Kill American Citizenship, Citizens Fight for their Ancient Rights

Obama’s Police State Dream Is Coming True

Statisticians Sue to Halt EPA Committee Work

Four Part Video: The Threat of China

Biden says he’s open to altering, eliminating filibuster to advance voting rights

Patience with Biden wearing thin among Black leaders

The Poor Will Always Be With Us

How free stuff is used to addict the urban poor to welfare

Some NC Ex-prisoners Will Soon Receive a Guaranteed Monthly Income

Other US Politics and Related:

Nationalism to Confront Globalism in Glasgow

The Legacy of Slavery is Not Simply Black and White

Victor Hanson: One Man’s Anarchy is Another’s Road to Justice

As America Teeters on Fiscal Disaster, Biden Worries about the Weather

Meta: The Final Disconnect From Reality?

US Military’s Misplaced Focus on COVID and Climate Change Could Cost Us the Next War

Religion Related:

Short Video: Amish Covid | Full Measure

Why atheism is ‘incompatible’ with science

Fourteen Years in Communist Prison Could Not Break His Faith

Education Related:

Why Is the AAUP Investigating UNC?

Short Video: It’s A Big Club And You Ain’t In It

Big-City Schools: Where America’s Most Vulnerable Kids Get Shafted

The Doctor Is In… on Educating America’s Children

Science and Misc Matters:

The New Victim of Cancel Culture: Science

Unpacking Propaganda: What Is It? What Can You Do About It?

Military Is Developing ‘Cognitive Warfare’ Weapons

Politics: some more equal than others

Shane Snow on Storytelling

NYS “Green Amendment,” Proposition 2, Will Only Enrich Lawyers

Please use social media, etc. to pass on this Newsletter to other open-minded citizens…

If at any time you’d like to be added to (or taken off) the distribution of our popular,  free Media Balance Newsletter, simply send me an email saying that.


Note 1: We recommend reading the Newsletter on your computer, not your phone, as some documents (e.g. PDFs) are much easier to read on a large computer screen… We’ve tried to use common fonts, etc. to minimize display issues.

Note 2: For recent past Newsletter issues see 2020 Archives & 2021 Archives. To accommodate numerous requests received about prior articles over the twelve plus years of the Newsletter, we’ve put together archives since the beginning of the Newsletter — where you can search by year. For a detailed background about the Newsletter, please read this.

Note 3: See this extensive list of reasonable books on climate change. As a parallel effort, we have also put together a list of some good books related to industrial wind energy. Both topics are also extensively covered on my website: WiseEnergy.org.

Note 4: I am not an attorney or a physician, so no material appearing in any of the Newsletters (or the WiseEnergy.org website) should be construed as giving legal or medical advice. My recommendation has always been: consult a competent, licensed attorney when you are involved with legal issues, and consult a competent physician regarding medical matters.

Copyright © 2021; Alliance for Wise Energy Decisions (see WiseEnergy.org).

Over Two Dozen FDNY Firehouses Shut Down Over Vax Mandate Staff Shortages thumbnail

Over Two Dozen FDNY Firehouses Shut Down Over Vax Mandate Staff Shortages

By Pamela Geller

The Democrats are killing us. Literally.

Over two dozen FDNY firehouses shut down over vax mandate staff shortage

By: New York Post, October 31, 2021:

The FDNY shuttered 26 fire companies citywide on Saturday due to staff shortages caused by the COVID-19 vaccination mandate, according to furious elected officials, who ripped the move as “unconscionable” — and warned it could have catastrophic consequences.

The shutdown came amid a pitched battle between City Hall, which on Monday will start enforcing a mandate that all city workers have at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, and jab-resisting firefighters, many reportedly saying they were already sick with the coronavirus and therefore have “natural immunity.”

Nicole Malliotakis (R-SI, Brooklyn) said 26 companies shuttered — five in her district — and laid the blame on  Mayor de Blasio.

“If someone dies due to a slower emergency response, it’s on Bill de Blasio and his overreaching mandates. I hope this fool fixes it ASAP!” she tweeted. Some residents rallied outside of the Ladder Company 149 in Dyker Heights to support the firefighters.

Irresponsible bogus sick leave by some of our members is creating a danger for New Yorkers and their fellow Firefighters,” Nigro said. “They need to return to work or risk the consequences of their actions.”

No borough or neighborhood was spared, with the shuttered companies ranging from Engine Co. 55 in lower Manhattan, to Engine Co. 234 in Crown Heights, to Engine Co. 231 in Brownsville. Others included Ladder Co. 128 in Long Island City and Engine Co. 158 and Ladder Co. 78 on Staten Island, according to information provided by Malliotakis and Councilman Joe Borelli (R-SI), who cited the Uniformed Firefighters Association. Borelli said the list of 26 came from a FDNY alert dispatched to members.

FDNY spokesman Jim Long said the closings are not permanent, describing the companies as “temporarily out of service” and the situation as “fluid” since it was shifting firefighters to units where they were needed.

As of late Saturday afternoon, the FDNY could not provide an exact number of closings that the pols said were in effect as of 7:30 am Saturday.

“The situation remains fluid. We hire manpower to get the company back in service or relocate other units to the area for coverage,” Long said.

In anticipation of a shortage of firefighters, NYPD’s Emergency Service Unit has requested the help of volunteer firefighters from Long Island and upstate to back fill the lost positions, according to an email obtained by The Post.

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Quick note: Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here. We will not waver. We will not tire. We will not falter, and we will not fail. Freedom will prevail.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here — it’s free and it’s critical NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America’s survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow me on Gettr. I am there. It’s open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

TAKE ACTION: GOP-Controlled Florida Legislature Wavering on Governor’s Effort to Ban Vax Mandates thumbnail

TAKE ACTION: GOP-Controlled Florida Legislature Wavering on Governor’s Effort to Ban Vax Mandates

By Royal A. Brown III

It appears Republicans, according to new House Speaker Renner in the below article, are NOT going to support Governor Ron DeSantis in his Special Session Call to ban Mandatory COVID-19 vaccinations called for by the Biden/Obama 3 Administration. This is going to cost thousands of jobs in Florida.  Renner’s characterization of those unwilling to take the jab is ridiculous.

Florida Lawmaker: GOP-Controlled Florida Legislature Unlikely to Ban Vaccine Mandates

The Republican-controlled Florida legislature is unlikely to ban President Biden’s vaccine mandates, according to Speaker-Designate Paul Renner (R).

Renner conveyed to Florida Politics that Gov. Ron DeSantis’ (R) special session in November will not meet many demands of the voters because “neither mandates nor employee restrictions will receive strong support,” the publication wrote.

[ … ]

Republican Florida House Speaker Chris Sprowls (R) and President of the Florida Senate Wilton Simpson (R) responded to DeSantis’ document by suggesting they will consider his request but did not mention any action against the mandate would occur.

Here is my joint statement with Senate President @WiltonSimpson regarding special session. https://t.co/rlahZA19Vh pic.twitter.com/MfL1usADNB

— Chris Sprowls (@ChrisSprowls) October 21, 2021

Read the full article.

TAKE ACTION NOW

Polk County Florida Legislative Delegation members are shown below with contact information:

Sen Ben Albritton – Sen Dis 26 – albritton.ben@flsenate.gov – 850-487-5026

Sen Danny Burgess – Sen Dist 20 –  burgess.danny@flsenate.gov – 850-487-5020

Sen Kelli Stargel – Sen Dis 22 –   stargel.kelli@flsenate.gov      – 850- 487-5022

Rep Josie Tomkow – House Dis 39 – josie.tomkow@myfloridahouse.go – 850-717-5039

Rep Colleen Burton – House Dis 40 – colleen.burton@myfloridahouse.gov – 850-717-5040

Rep Sam Killebrew – House Dis 41 – sam.killebrew@myfloridahouse.gov – 850-717-5041

Rep Fred Hawkins – House Dis 42 – fhawkinsjr@gmail.com – 850-717-5042

Rep Melony Bell – House Dis 56 – melony.bell@myfloridahouse.gov – 850-717-5056

©Royal A. Brown III. All rights reserved.

Biden Plan Puts Medicare Part D in Peril thumbnail

Biden Plan Puts Medicare Part D in Peril

By David Almasi

With liberal lawmakers coveting an expansion of government control over Americans’ health care, their efforts risk “taking programs that work well and mangling them in the name of ‘reform.’”

In a commentary published by Missouri’s Springfield News-Leader, Project 21 Co-Chairman Stacy Washington – a resident of the St. Louis metro area – writes about how efforts to mess with the free market, contained in Joe Biden’s $ 3.5 trillion spending plan, could compromise seniors’ Medicare Part D prescription drug benefits:

To be sure, they imbue their actions with good intentions. By enabling the government to set drug prices in Medicare, they claim they’ll save seniors money at the pharmacy.

But they’re wrong. Insurers already drive a hard bargain with drug companies. Replacing these negotiations with government-directed price controls will, if anything, pad the Treasury Department’s balance sheet at the expense of limiting seniors’ access to life-saving treatments today and curtailing the development of new medicines tomorrow…

A pillar of this legislation is the “non-interference clause,” which prevents the government from involvement in negotiations between Part D insurers and drug companies. This clause exists so bureaucrats won’t get to decide which drugs Medicare can cover and to ensure that Part D insurers and drug companies will offer as many medication choices as possible.

But this clause – and the benefit – are imperiled by the Biden Administration’s plan to fundamentally transform America:

If they repeal the non-interference clause, the government would be able to set drug prices. This might sound appealing, but in practice, it’d be extremely difficult for Medicare negotiators to get better prices than private Part D plan insurers unless they’re willing to ration access to the most expensive drugs. With less revenue coming in, research companies would have less money to invest in the scientific exploration that brings new medicines to market.

Even worse? The savings the government would yield for itself through price controls wouldn’t even go to patients. Lawmakers plan to take that money and redirect it to a host of new spending programs. In short, the proposed change to Medicare is designed to pay for more wind farms.

As for what the conservative resistance in Congress can do, she advises: “By saving the non-interference clause, they’ll protect a program that helps vulnerable seniors.”

*****

This article was published on October 27, 2021, and reproduced with permission from The National Center for Public Policy Research.

Demented Child-Sniffer Biden CANCELS Halloween For Children thumbnail

Demented Child-Sniffer Biden CANCELS Halloween For Children

By Pamela Geller

He should be kept away from children but this is extreme.

#Trump was the real deal. The @WhiteHouse cancelled #Halloween because #Biden can’t help but sniff & inappropriately touch kids. @POTUS is a pedo. https://t.co/TC2Ltv1WV3

— Mrs. H (@Living4TheNow) October 28, 2021

Joe Biden Says No to Children: Cancels White House Trick-or-Treating for Halloween

By: Breitbart News, October 29, 2021:

President Joe Biden and First Lady Jill Biden have canceled the traditional Halloween party at the White House, citing their travel plans to Europe for the reason.

“The president and first lady will be traveling internationally during the last days of October and will not be hosting a specific event at the White House,” Michael LaRosa, the press secretary for First Lady Jill Biden announced in a statement.

The president and First Lady traditionally welcome children on the South Lawn for trick-or-treating and decorate the White House with spectacular spooky themes.

WASHINGTON, DC – OCTOBER 28: U.S. President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump hand out candy to children as they trick-or-treat during a Halloween at the White House event at the South Portico of the White House.

Joe Biden’s going on vacation again! And on Halloween! Here’s a Trump Halloween photo from awhile back. The People’s House would be decorated and ready for festivities this 2021 with Trump. pic.twitter.com/XnVzpG7oKf

— Shannon Ford (@h0memadetweets) October 29, 2021

The Biden statement noted that the White House will be lit in orange instead to mark the occasion.

The Bidens asked parents and children to spend time outdoors for the Halloween holiday, as the coronavirus pandemic continues.

“The First Family encourages families and children to celebrate Halloween with trick or treating outdoors in their neighborhoods or other outdoor venues,” the statement read.

Biden will leave for Rome on Thursday for the G-20 summit over the weekend. He will also have an audience with Pope Francis in Vatican City.

The president also plans to meet with French President Emmanuel Macron before he travels to the climate change summit in Glasgow, Scotland.

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Quick note: Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here. We will not waver. We will not tire. We will not falter, and we will not fail. Freedom will prevail.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here — it’s free and it’s critical NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America’s survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow me on Gettr. I am there. It’s open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Florida Sues Over Vaccine Mandate thumbnail

Florida Sues Over Vaccine Mandate

By The Daily Caller

Florida filed a suit Thursday against President Joe Biden, NASA and several other agencies alleging the Biden administration’s vaccine mandates requiring government contractors to get vaccinated is “unlawful,” according to Fox News.

Attorney General Ashley Moody and Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis filed the suit in U.S. District Court in Florida’s Tampa division arguing NASA and others “frequently contracts with Florida, has current contractual relationships with Florida, and is and will continue to seek to impose the Biden administration’s unlawful requirements to Florida,” according to Fox News.

The suit also lists NASA Administrator Bill Nelson, White House Office of Management and Budget officials, and Department of Defense officials due to the coronavirus vaccine mandate. The mandate requires workers within those branches and federal contractors be fully vaccinated by Dec. 8.

“Because the government’s unlawful vaccine requirement seeks to interfere with Florida’s employment policies and threaten Florida with economic harm and the loss of federal contracts, the State seeks relief from this court,” the suit reportedly reads. 

The suit argues the administration is “relying on a statute” that gives Biden the authority to “‘prescribe policies and directives that the president considers necessary to carry out’ the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949” to “compel millions of Americans who work for government contractors to receive a COVID-19 vaccine,” according to Fox News.

“Nothing in that statute authorizes such a radical intrusion on the personal autonomy of American workers – especially, as is the case here, when many of those workers are officials of a sovereign state,” the suit reads.

The state argues the administration “misread [the] Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949,” arguing the act “does not authorize the government to use its contracts to impose social policy not authorized by Congress,” Fox News reported.

“We said we’d take action and we did,” DeSantis said Thursday while announcing the suit. “People should be able to work.”

DeSantis has been outspoken against the mandate, saying Sunday “what Biden’s doing is unconstitutional. He does not have the authority” to impose the vaccine mandate. DeSantis said he’s working on legislation to provide a $5,000 bonus to law enforcement personnel who relocate to Florida to evade vaccine mandates.

Biden said in September getting the vaccine is “not about freedom or personal choice,” before mandating all employers with 100 or more employees require employees to be vaccinated or submit to weekly testing.

COLUMN BY

BRIANNA LYMAN

Reporter. Follow Brianna on Twitter

RELATED ARTICLES:

Exposing Vaccine Passports

Irish county with 99.7% vaccination rate has highest COVID case rate

In-N-Out Burger Location Forced To Shutdown Because Employees Refused To Check Vaccination Status

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Harvard Professor of Medicine: ‘Children Should NOT Get COVID-19 Vaccines’ thumbnail

Harvard Professor of Medicine: ‘Children Should NOT Get COVID-19 Vaccines’

By Pamela Geller

Martin Kulldorff, is a professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School and a biostatistician at the Brigham and Women’s Hospital. He serves on scientific advisory committees to the Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control. Kulldorff said children should not get vaccinated against the virus that causes COVID-19, according to Harvard University professor of medicine Martin Kulldorff.

WHITE HOUSE UNVEILS PLAN TO “QUICKLY” VACCINATE CHILDREN AGES 5-11

FDA panel votes 17-0 to start giving vaccine to young children

FDA panel member Dr. Eric Rubin called the vaccine “pretty safe” in one article (NBC News) but in a separate interview said “We’re never gonna learn about how safe the vaccine is until we start giving it” (Twitter).

JUST IN: FDA Panel votes 17-0 to approve vaccines for children ages 5-11…

Dr. Ruben on the FDA panel: “We’re never gonna learn about how safe the vaccine is until we start giving it. That’s the way it goes.”

pic.twitter.com/VWKYhG4cK2

— Matt Couch (@RealMattCouch) October 26, 2021

From Karol Markowicz: Gotta say, not a comforting comment. Doesn’t make me want to run right out and get it for my kids for some reason (Twitter).

Gotta say, not a comforting comment. Doesn’t make me want to run right out and get it for my kids for some reason. https://t.co/myUjvxxWhk

— Karol Markowicz (@karol) October 27, 2021

Children Shouldn’t Get COVID-19 Vaccines, Harvard Professor Says

By Zachary Stieber and Jan Jekielek, October 26, 2021:

Children should not get vaccinated against the virus that causes COVID-19, according to Harvard University professor of medicine Martin Kulldorff.

“I don’t think children should be vaccinated for COVID. I’m a huge fan of vaccinating children for measles, for mumps, for polio, for rotavirus, and many other diseases, that’s critical. But COVID is not a huge threat to children,” he said on EpochTV’s “American Thought Leaders” program. The full episode can be watched on EpochTV.

“They can be infected, just like they can get the common cold, but they’re not a big threat. They don’t die from this, except in very rare circumstances. So if you want to talk about protecting children or keeping children safe, I think we can talk about traffic accidents, for example, which they are really at some risk.

“And there are other things that we should make sure [of] to keep children safe. But COVID is not a big risk factor for children.”

“Hospitals should hire nurses & other staff with natural immunity…They are the ones who are least likely to infect the residents. [Yet] we’re doing the opposite. They’re being fired.”

Deep-dive w/ Harvard epidemiologist @MartinKulldorff

🔴WATCH: https://t.co/qZ3LrEqVgl pic.twitter.com/U4oXTr2Fhg

— Jan Jekielek (@JanJekielek) October 26, 2021

Vaccinating older people and people of all ages with compromised immune systems against the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus, which causes COVID-19, has drawn support from most medical experts. But vaccinating healthy young people, particularly children, has triggered more opposition, in part because of how little risk COVID-19 poses to them.

Children are more likely to contract serious disease or die from the annual influenza, or the flu, than COVID-19, according to data and studies that Kulldorff has reviewed. Just 195 children under the age of 4 and 442 between 5 and 18 have died from COVID-19 in the United States as of Oct. 20, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Children are 15 times less likely to be hospitalized with the disease than individuals who are 85 or older, and 570 times less likely to die, the agency says.

“One example is from Sweden, during the first wave in the spring of 2020, which affected Sweden quite strongly,” Kulldorff said. “But Sweden decided to keep daycare and schools open for all children ages 1 to 15. And there are 1.8 million such children who got through the first wave without vaccines, of course, without masks, without any sort of distancing in schools.

“If a child was sick, they were told to stay home. But that was basically it. And you know how many of those 1.8 million children died from COVID? Zero. Only a few hospitalizations. So this is not a risky disease for children.”

When weighing whether to vaccinate children, the risk of vaccine side effects must also be taken into account, Kulldorff said. The main risk to young people seen so far is heart inflammation, which has occurred post-vaccination at much higher than expected rates. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) added a warning label to the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines over the summer about myocarditis and pericarditis, two types of heart inflammation.

“If you’re 78 years old, then it’s the no-brainer, in my view, because the benefits are so great that even if you have a small risk for some adverse reaction, the benefit far outweighs the risk,” Kulldorff said. “On the other hand, if you have already have immunity from having had COVID, then the benefits of the vaccines are much, much smaller. If you’re a child, even if you haven’t had COVID, the risk of serious disease or death is minuscule … So it’s not at all clear that the benefits outweigh the risks for children.”

Kulldorff was speaking ahead of an FDA advisory panel meeting. Members on Oct. 26 decided to advise drug regulators to authorize Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine for use in children between 5 and 11. They said the benefits of vaccinating the age group, such as the predicted decrease in hospitalizations, outweighed the risks, including estimated incidence of myocarditis.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Illinois Bill would remove ‘conscience’ as basis for refusing vaccine

Here’s how the media is deliberately misreporting COVID-19’s death toll in America

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Quick note: Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here. We will not waver. We will not tire. We will not falter, and we will not fail. Freedom will prevail.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here – it’s free and it’s critical NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America’s survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow me on Gettr. I am there. It’s open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Vax Hysteria: CDC Dirty in 1976 – Worse Today. thumbnail

Vax Hysteria: CDC Dirty in 1976 – Worse Today.

By Graham Ledger

45 years ago, the federal government, lead by the CDC, used fear to coerce millions of Americans into getting a “vaccine” for the Swine Flu. The shot killed more than the flu. Sound familiar?

Today, it’s the same thing, only this time the folks in government are raking-in huge profits (Pfizer) along with the pharmaceuticals. Ivermectin works both as a prophylactic and as a treatment with a very high success rate. This virus has a 99% survival rate, thus none of the “vaccine” hysteria makes any sense to a rational person, unless it’s about the money and power (or power and money).

Graham Ledger speaks with Del Bigtree, founder of the non-profit Informed Consent Action Network, about why patriotic Americans must fight back against government forcing Americans to get a shot as part of the largest, most dangerous human trial in world history.

EDITORS NOTE: This Ledger Report video is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved. Please subscribe free to The Ledger Report by clicking here: www.GrahamLedger.com

VIDEO: How the White House Will Steal Christmas thumbnail

VIDEO: How the White House Will Steal Christmas

By Family Research Council

The Grinch may have stiff competition in President Biden. Retailers, industry leaders and labor groups aren’t sending their requests to the North Pole — they are sending them to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, asking the president to push pause on the deadline for workers to comply with the COVID vaccine mandate, which has been set for December 8.

Christmas is the “biggest season” for businesses and retailers, Congressman Randy Weber (R-Texas) explained on “Washington Watch.” They typically operate in the red for 11 months of the year and turn a profit (get “in the black”) starting on Black Friday. Many businesses are already short-staffed after having had to compete all year with excessive unemployment benefits approved by Congress. Many already plan to hire additional workers to accommodate the rush of holiday shoppers. They fear a vaccine mandate would force workers to quit just when they need them most. In fact, in one survey, 30 percent of unvaccinated workers said they would leave their job over a vaccine mandate, while only 12 percent said they would be likely to get the vaccine.

Normally, the alternative to retailers is online shopping. But that requires someone to ship and handle the orders: truck drivers. “For years,” said Weber, “the trucking industry actually had a bumper sticker that said if anything got delivered to your door, it came by truck.” American Trucking Associations President and CEO Chris Spear warned the Office of Management and Budget (which is reviewing the private employer mandate) in a letter last Thursday, “placing vaccination mandates on employers, which in turn force employees to be vaccinated, will create a workforce crisis for our industry.” He estimates 37 percent of truck drivers could retire early, resign, or switch to smaller companies.

The problem is worse for companies with federal contracts like UPS and FedEx because they are covered by the federal contractor mandate that has already been issued. Last Monday, members of the Cargo Airline Association expressed “significant concerns with … the ability of industry members to implement the required employee vaccinations by Dec. 8, 2021” in a letter to President Biden. All of these delivery obstacles simply compound the supply chain problems created by the bottleneck at America’s ports.

President Biden promised to end the coronavirus pandemic within his first 100 days as president. Now, his increasingly grasping attempts to deal with it may just cancel Christmas. Perhaps that will awaken the 42 percent of Americans who still approve of the job he is doing.

My empathy is for the workers and their families, not for big business. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and their allies spend their time and money advocating for the Left’s social policies, fund their left-wing candidates for office, and then they come crying to conservatives to save them from left-wing economic policies. Their lobbying to postpone the vaccine mandate deadline until after the holidays “makes sense from a business standpoint,” as Weber pointed out. But it shows they care more about their bottom line than for their workers. Those workers will still care about their freedom come January. “Sure, they would get a reprieve for 90 days,” said Weber, but the businesses will leave those workers and their families out in the cold as soon as their own warm pockets are lined. America’s big businesses, so often given to moralistic crusading, have taken a hard pass on defending the rights of their workers to make their own health care decisions.

EDITORS NOTE: This FRC-Action column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Brnovich Requests Restraining Order Against Biden Vaccine Mandate thumbnail

Brnovich Requests Restraining Order Against Biden Vaccine Mandate

By Elizabeth Troutman

Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich asked the U.S. District Court in Arizona for a temporary restraining order and nationwide preliminary injunction against the Biden Administration’s COVID-19 vaccine mandates.

“The COVID-19 vaccine mandate is one of the greatest infringements upon individual liberty, federalism, and the separation of powers by any administration in our country’s history,” Brnovich said in a news release Friday.

President Joe Biden announced an emergency rule mandating vaccinations for all private companies with more than 100 employees on Sept. 9.

“This is not about freedom or personal choice,” Biden said in a press conference. “It’s about protecting yourself and those around you.”

On Sept. 14, Brnovich became the first U.S. attorney general to file a lawsuit against the mandates, arguing they violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution by allowing unvaccinated migrants to enter the United States.

Brnovich’s Friday amended complaint expanded his lawsuit against the administration by adding claims against the federal contractor and federal employment requirements. He said the mandates violate the constitutional rights of federal employees, contractors, and subcontractors, as well as individuals’ statutory right to refuse vaccines available under Emergency Use Authorizations from the Food and Drug Administration.

The Attorney General’s office cited an Engineering New-Record report predicting more than 40% of the workforce “…will quit and go to work for another contractor that does not have such a mandate.” This substantial change in the workforce will damage the economy, the office said.

Two dozen Republican attorneys general have threatened to file against the mandate, calling the plan “disastrous and counterproductive” in a letter to Biden.

“Mr. President, your vaccination mandate represents not only a threat to individual liberty, but a public health disaster that will displace vulnerable workers and exacerbate a nationwide hospital staffing crisis, with severe consequences for all Americans,” the attorney’s general wrote.

*****

This article was published on October 25, 2021, and is reproduced with permission from The Center Square.

Tucson To Terminate Unvaccinated City Employees, Gov. Ducey Threatens Legal Action thumbnail

Tucson To Terminate Unvaccinated City Employees, Gov. Ducey Threatens Legal Action

By Elizabeth Troutman

The Tucson City Council decided in a 4-3 vote to terminate city employees who are not vaccinated by Dec. 1, resulting in backlash from Gov. Doug Ducey, who called the decision “unfathomable.”

City Manager Michael Ortega recommended the termination of the more than 300 unvaccinated city employees if they did not comply by Dec. 1. Those who miss the deadline will be given notice to terminate by Dec. 3 and have a pre-discharge meeting with their supervisor on Dec. 10. Supervisors will make final termination decisions by Dec. 17.

Unvaccinated Tucson employees were already subject to five-day suspensions as of Aug. 14, but mandate enforcement lapsed on Sept. 7 after Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich said the policy violated state law prohibiting local governments from mandating vaccines. Suspension implementation returned when Maricopa County Superior Court judge ruled the law Brnovich claimed the city violated to be unconstitutional.

“The state Legislature has spoken on this issue – they want Arizonans and their sincerely held beliefs to be protected from overreaching mandates,” Ducey tweeted.

Tucson Mayor Regina Romero voted for the measure, as well as Councilmembers Steve Kozachik, Lane Santa Cruz, and Karin Uhlich. Councilmembers Paul Cunningham, Nikki Lee and Richard Fimbres voted “no.”

Romero criticized Ducey’s threats of legal action against the city, saying it was a “politically motivated attempt to micromanage Tucson.”

“It is deeply unfortunate not just for Tucsonans, but all Arizonans that Gov. Ducey is more interested in playing politics with the vaccine than taking any action whatsoever to protect public health,” she tweeted.

Ducey said though he encourages Arizonans to get the vaccine, the law prohibits vaccine mandates in Arizona.

*****

This article was published on October 22, 2021, and is reproduced with permission from The Center Square.

Fossil Fuels Form The Basis Of Our Medical And Food Supply Chains thumbnail

Fossil Fuels Form The Basis Of Our Medical And Food Supply Chains

By Ronald Stein

Under Biden’s plan to rid America of fossil fuels, such a plan would eliminate the medical industry that is totally reliant on the products made from petroleum derivatives, and eliminate oil-based fertilizers to grow the crops that feed the 8 billion on planet earth. Surprisingly, Biden must be oblivious to the consequences of his plan as efforts to cease the use of oil could be the greatest threat to civilization, not climate change.

Biden supports the end of fracking, oil exploration, and oil importing which cuts off the supply chain of crude oil to refineries. Without any crude oil to manufacture, the elimination of the supply chain to the 131 operating refineries in the U.S. would eliminate that manufacturing sector.

Without refineries, there will be none of the oil derivatives that are manufactured from crude oil that are the basis of more than 6,000 products in our economy and lifestyles.

Without the supply chain of crude oil, not only is the refining industry history, but the domino effects are the destructive impacts on the medical, food supply, electronics, and communications industries as they are all totally dependent on the products made from oil derivatives manufactured from crude oil. Any grade school-educated kid can understand that breezes and sunshine, can only make weather-dependent intermittent electricity.

The medical industry is reliant on the products derived from the derivatives manufactured from oil that produce all the critical medical equipment like ultrasound systems, defibrillators, exhalation valves, inhalation valves, CT systems, X-ray, medicines, masks, gloves, soap and hand sanitizers for hospitals, and protective gowns, gloves and face shields gear for doctors and nurses.

Is Biden oblivious to the fact that all those medical products begin from crude oil, or as the Wall Street Journal states – Big Oil to the Coronavirus Rescue? Vaccines need refrigeration, and refrigeration need electricity, especially in the hospital sector where redundant generation capacity for continuous uninterruptable electricity is a mandate.

While Biden attempts to lower emissions at any cost, in favor of some weather-dependent electricity from breezes and sunshine that can only survive with massive subsidies, coal imports and exports continue to increase internationally to meet the electricity generation needs of developing countries as reflected in the Merrill Lynch Global Energy Weekly report.

At least 80 percent of humanity, or more than 6 billion in this world cannot subsidize themselves out of a paper bag as they are living on less than $10 a day. To reduce emissions in the developing countries that control most emissions, the wealthy countries would need to step up and subsidize electricity generation from breezes and sunshine, to replace more than 3,000 coal fired power plants in developing countries like China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Africa, and Vietnam with billions of people seeking affordable electricity.

The oil that reduced infant mortality, extended longevity to more than 80+ and allowed the world to populate to from 1 to 8 billion in less than 200 short years, is now required to provide the food, medical, communications, and transportation infrastructures to maintain and grow that population.

A key question for President Biden before America attends the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Conference in Glasgow, Scotland in November:

How dare pro-humanity individuals and governments support the banishment of fossil fuels, when their banishment would be the greatest threat to civilization resulting in billions dying from starvation, diseases, and weather-related deaths?

Getting off fossil fuels would reverse most of the progress humanity has made over the last few centuries. The inventions of the automobile, airplane, and the use of petroleum in the early 1900’s led us into the Industrial Revolution and victories in World Wars I and II. The healthier and wealthier countries of today now have more than 6,000 products that did not exist a few hundred years ago, all manufactured from fossil fuels, the same fossil fuels that Biden wants to eliminate.

Under Biden’s plan to rid American lifestyles and economies of fossil fuels, such a plan would ground the military, space program, and Air Force 1. It would also mothball the huge energy demands of airlines, cruise ships and merchant ships, as well as eliminate the medical industry, electronics industry, and the communications industry that are totally reliant on the 6,000 products made from petroleum derivatives.

The first use of oil-based fertilizers took place in 1946, and today our food supply is dependent on hydrocarbons. The world’s population of 8 billion souls depends on oil-based fertilizers to grow the crops and feed the animals that are consumed each year. Any cessation of hydrocarbons will immediately result in the annihilation of billions of souls, returning the globe to a 1950 population count of approximately 2.5 billion souls.

How can a pro-humanity President Biden support COVID injections to save thousands of lives, and simultaneously support ridding the world of fossil fuels that would be the greatest threat to civilization resulting in billions dying from starvation, diseases, and weather-related deaths?

*****

This article was published on October 19, 2021, and is reproduced with permission from CFACT, Committee for A Constructive Tomorrow.